10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-33376
GSC Investment Corp.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
20-8700615 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
888 Seventh Ave
New York, New York 10019
(Address of principal executive offices)
(212) 884-6200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Shares, par value $0.0001 per share
|
|
The New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate
Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of
the registrant as of August 29, 2008 was approximately $74.5 million based upon a closing price of
$10.80 reported for such date by the New York Stock Exchange. Common shares held by each executive
officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding common shares have
been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate
status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
The number of outstanding common shares of the registrant as of May 18, 2009 was 8,291,384.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on July 8, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report
NOTE ABOUT REFERENCES TO GSC INVESTMENT CORP.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Annual Report), the Company, we, us and our
refer to GSC Investment Corp., its subsidiaries and related companies, unless the context otherwise
requires.
NOTE ABOUT TRADEMARKS
We have entered into a license agreement with GSC Group, pursuant to which GSC Group grants us
a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the GSC name and logo.
NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements in this Annual Report constitute forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and
strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not
historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as
anticipate, believe, could, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, potential,
project, should, will and would or the negative of these terms or other comparable
terminology.
The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our
future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs,
assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of
which are known to us or are within our control. If a change occurs, our business, financial
condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our
forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report involve risks and
uncertainties, including statements as to:
|
|
|
our future operating results; |
|
|
|
|
our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of investments that we expect to make; |
|
|
|
|
our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties; |
|
|
|
|
the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the
industries in which we invest; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives; |
|
|
|
|
our expected financings and investments; |
|
|
|
|
our regulatory structure and tax treatment, including our ability to operate as a
business development company and a regulated investment company; |
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our investment adviser to locate suitable investments for us and to
monitor and effectively administer our investments; and |
|
|
|
|
continued access to our Revolving Facility. |
For a discussion of factors that could cause our actual results to differ from forward-looking
statements contained in this Annual Report, please see the discussion under Part I, Item 1A Risk
Factors. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report relate only to events as of the date on which
the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report.
2
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
GSC Investment Corp. is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be treated as a business
development company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Company
is the successor by merger to GSC Investment, LLC (the LLC), a Maryland limited liability company
that had elected to be regulated as a BDC, which was merged into the Company concurrently with the
Companys incorporation on March 21, 2007. As a result of the merger, each outstanding common share
of the LLC was converted into an equivalent number of shares of the Companys common stock. As of
February 28, 2007, the Company (including its predecessors) had not commenced operations or
investment activities.
Our investment objectives are to generate current income and capital appreciation through debt
and equity investments by primarily investing in middle market companies and select high yield
bonds. We have elected and qualified to be treated as a regulated investment company (RIC) under
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). We commenced operations
on March 23, 2007 and completed our initial public offering (IPO) on March 28, 2007. We are
externally managed and advised by our investment adviser, GSCP (NJ), L.P. (together with certain of
its affiliates, GSC Group).
We used the net proceeds of our IPO to purchase approximately $100.7 million in aggregate
principal amount of debt investments from GSC Partners CDO Fund III, Limited (CDO Fund III), a
collateralized loan obligation (CLO) fund managed by our investment adviser. We used borrowings
under our Facilities (as defined below) to purchase approximately $115.1 million in aggregate
principal amount of debt investments in April and May 2007 from CDO Fund III and GSC Partners CDO
Fund Limited (CDO Fund I), a collateralized debt obligation fund managed by our investment
adviser. As of February 28, 2009, our portfolio consisted of $118.9 million of investments in 35
portfolio companies and one CLO.
Our portfolio is comprised primarily of investments in leveraged loans (comprised of both
first and second lien term loans) issued by middle market companies and high yield bonds. We seek
to create a diversified portfolio by investing up to 5% of our total assets in each investment,
although the investment sizes may be more or less than the targeted range. These investments are
sourced in both the primary and secondary markets through a network of relationships with
commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies and financial sponsors. Due to
unfavorable conditions in the credit market, the majority of our trading activity over the last
year has been in the secondary market. The leveraged loans and high yield bonds that we purchase
are generally used to finance buyouts, acquisitions, growth, recapitalizations and other types of
transactions. Leveraged loans are generally senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated
debt of the portfolio company. Leveraged loans also have the benefit of security interests on the
assets of the portfolio company, which may rank ahead of, or be junior to, other security
interests. High yield bonds are typically subordinated to leveraged loans and generally unsecured,
though a substantial amount of the high yield bonds that we currently own are secured.
Substantially all of the debt investments held in our portfolio hold a non-investment grade rating
by Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) and/or Standard & Poors or, if not rated, would be rated
below investment grade if rated. High yield bonds rated below investment grade are commonly
referred to as junk bonds. As part of our long-term strategy, we also anticipate purchasing
mezzanine debt and making equity investments in middle market companies. Mezzanine debt is
typically unsecured and subordinated to senior debt of the portfolio company. For purposes of this
Annual Report, we generally use the term middle market to refer to companies with annual EBITDA
of between $5 million and $50 million. EBITDA represents earnings before net interest expense,
income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Investments in middle market companies are generally
less liquid than equivalent investments in companies with larger capitalizations.
While our primary focus is to generate current income and capital appreciation through
investments in debt and equity securities of middle market companies and high yield bonds, we
intend to invest up to 30% of our assets in opportunistic investments. Opportunistic investments
may include investments in distressed debt, debt and equity securities of public companies, credit
default swaps, emerging market debt, and structured finance vehicles, including CLOs. As part of
this 30%, we may also invest in debt of middle market companies located outside the United States.
Given our primary investment focus on first and second lien term loans issued by middle market
companies and high yield bonds, we believe our opportunistic investments will allow us to
supplement our core investments with other investments that are within our investment advisers
expertise that we believe offer attractive yields and/or the potential for capital appreciation. As
of February 28, 2009, our investment in the subordinated notes of GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007,
Ltd. (GSCIC CLO), a CLO we manage, constituted 17.1% of our total assets. We do not expect to
manage and purchase all of the equity in another CLO transaction in the near future. We may,
however, invest in CLO securities issued by other investment managers.
As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we
have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in qualifying assets, including securities of
U.S. operating companies whose securities are not listed on a national securities
4
exchange (i.e., New York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange and The NASDAQ Global
Market), U.S. operating companies with listed securities that have market capitalizations of less
than $250 million, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt
investments that mature in one year or less. In addition, we are only allowed to borrow money such
that our asset coverage, which, as defined in the 1940 Act, measures the ratio of total assets less
total liabilities (excluding borrowings) to total borrowings, equals at least 200% after such
borrowing, with certain limited exceptions.
Investments
As of February 28, 2009, our portfolio consisted of $118.9 million in investments. We seek to
create a diversified portfolio that includes leveraged loans, mezzanine debt and high yield bonds
by investing up to 5% of our total investments in each portfolio company, although the investment
sizes may be more or less than the targeted range. As of February 28, 2009, we invested in excess
of 5% of our total investments in 4 of the 35 portfolio companies and the GSCIC CLO, but in each
case less than 18.8% of our total investments, and our five largest portfolio company exposures
represented approximately 43.6% of our total investments. As part of our long-term strategy, we
also anticipate purchasing mezzanine debt and making equity investments in middle market companies.
Leveraged loans
Our leveraged loan portfolio is comprised primarily of first lien and second lien term loans.
First lien term loans are secured by a first priority perfected security interest on all or
substantially all of the assets of the borrower and typically include a first priority pledge of
the capital stock of the borrower. First lien term loans hold a first priority with regard to right
of payment. Generally, first lien term loans offer floating rate interest payments, have a stated
maturity of five to seven years, and have a fixed amortization schedule. First lien term loans
generally have restrictive financial and negative covenants. Second lien term loans are secured by
a second priority perfected security interest on all or substantially all of the assets of the
borrower and typically include a second priority pledge of the capital stock of the borrower.
Second lien term loans hold a second priority with regard to right of payment. Second lien term
loans offer either floating rate or fixed rate interest payments, generally have a stated maturity
of five to eight years, and may or may not have a fixed amortization schedule. Second lien term
loans that do not have fixed amortization schedules require payment of the principal amount of the
loan upon the maturity date of the loan. Second lien term loans have less restrictive financial and
negative covenants than those that govern first lien term loans.
High yield bonds
High yield bonds are generally either senior secured or unsecured. Senior secured bonds are
secured by a perfected security interest on all or substantially all of the assets of the borrower
(which, however, may be contractually subordinated to liens on certain assets of the borrower). In
addition, senior secured bonds may have a pledge of the capital stock of the borrower. Senior
secured bonds offer either floating rate or fixed rate interest payments and generally have a
stated maturity of five to eight years and do not have fixed amortization schedules. Senior secured
bonds generally have less restrictive financial and negative covenants than those that govern first
lien and second lien term loans.
Unsecured bonds are not secured by the underlying assets or collateral of the issuer and may
be subordinate in priority of payment to senior debt of the issuer. In the event of the borrowers
liquidation, dissolution, reorganization, bankruptcy or other similar proceeding, the bondholders
only have the right to share pari passu in the issuers unsecured assets with other equally-ranking
creditors of the issuer. Unsecured bonds typically have fixed rate interest payments and a stated
maturity of five to ten years and do not have fixed amortization schedules.
Mezzanine debt
Mezzanine debt usually ranks subordinate in priority of payment to senior debt and is often
unsecured. However, mezzanine debt ranks senior to common and preferred equity in a borrowers
capital structure. Mezzanine debt typically has fixed rate interest payments and a stated maturity
of six to eight years and does not have fixed amortization schedules.
In some cases our debt investments may provide for a portion of the interest payable to be
paid-in-kind interest. To the extent interest is paid-in-kind, it will be payable through the
increase of the principal amount of the obligation by the amount of interest due on the
then-outstanding aggregate principal amount of such obligation.
Equity investments
Equity investments may consist of preferred equity that is expected to pay dividends on a
current basis or preferred equity that does not pay current dividends. Preferred equity generally
has a preference over common equity as to distributions on liquidation and
5
dividends. In some cases, we may acquire common equity. In general, our equity investments are
not control-oriented investments and we expect that in many cases we will acquire equity securities
as part of a group of private equity investors in which we are not the lead investor.
Opportunistic Investments
Opportunistic investments may include investments in distressed debt, debt and equity
securities of public companies, credit default swaps, emerging market debt, structured finance
vehicles, including CLOs, and debt of middle market companies located outside the United States. In
January 2008, we purchased for $30 million all of the outstanding subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO,
a $400 million CLO managed by us that invests primarily in leveraged loans. As of February 28,
2009, the GSCIC CLO portfolio consisted of $416.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
investments in 152 obligors with an average obligor exposure of $2.7 million and $9.4 million in
uninvested cash. The weighted average maturity of the portfolio is 4.7 years. We do not expect to
manage and purchase all of the equity in another CLO transaction in the near future. We may,
however, invest in CLO securities issued by other investment managers.
Prospective portfolio company characteristics
Our investment adviser, GSC Group, utilizes the investment philosophy of its corporate credit
and distressed investment group in identifying and selecting portfolio company investments. Our
portfolio companies generally have one or more of the following characteristics:
|
|
|
a history of generating stable earnings and strong free cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
well constructed balance sheets, including an established tangible liquidation
value; |
|
|
|
|
reasonable debt-to-cash flow multiples; |
|
|
|
|
industry leadership with competitive advantages and sustainable market shares in
attractive sectors; and |
|
|
|
|
capital structures that provide appropriate terms and reasonable covenants. |
Investment selection
In managing us, GSC Group employs the same investment philosophy and portfolio management
methodologies used by its corporate credit and distressed investment group. Through this investment
selection process, based on quantitative and qualitative analysis, GSC Group seeks to identify
issuers with superior fundamental risk-reward profiles and strong, defensible business franchises
with the goal of minimizing principal losses while maximizing risk-adjusted returns. Our advisers
investment process emphasizes the following:
|
|
|
bottoms-up, company-specific research and analysis; |
|
|
|
|
capital preservation, low volatility and minimization of downside risk; and |
|
|
|
|
investing with experienced management teams that hold meaningful equity ownership
in their businesses. |
Our advisers investment process generally includes the following steps:
|
|
|
Initial screening. A brief analysis identifies the investment opportunity and
reviews the merits of the transaction. The initial screening memorandum provides a brief
description of the company, its industry, competitive position, capital structure,
financials, equity sponsor and deal economics. If the deal is determined to be
attractive by the senior members of the deal team, the opportunity is more fully
analyzed. |
6
|
|
|
Full analysis. A full analysis includes: |
|
|
|
Business and Industry analysis a review of the companys
business position, competitive dynamics within its industry, cost and growth
drivers and technological and geographic factors. Business and industry research
often includes meetings with industry experts, consultants, other investors,
customers and competitors. |
|
|
|
|
Company analysis a review of the companys historical financial
performance, future projections, cash flow characteristics, balance sheet
strength, liquidation value, legal, financial and accounting risks, contingent
liabilities, market share analysis and growth prospects. |
|
|
|
|
Structural/security analysis a thorough legal document analysis
including but not limited to an assessment of financial and negative covenants,
events of default, enforceability of liens and voting rights. |
|
|
|
Approval of the group head. After an investment has been identified and
diligence has been completed, a report is prepared. This report is reviewed by the
senior investment professional in charge of the potential investment. If such senior
investment professional is in favor of the potential investment, it is presented for the
approval of the group head. Additional due diligence with respect to any investment may
be conducted by attorneys and independent accountants prior to the closing of the
investment, as well as by other outside advisers, as appropriate. |
|
|
|
|
Approval of the investment committee. After the approval of the group head, the
investment is presented to the investment committee for approval. Sale recommendations
made by the investment staff must also be approved by the investment committee. Purchase
and sale recommendations over $10 million per issuer require unanimous and majority
approval of the investment committee, respectively. Each of our Chief Executive Officer,
Seth M. Katzenstein, and Chairman, Richard M. Hayden has discretionary authority to make
purchases or sales below $10 million per issuer, subject to certain aggregate limits. |
Investment structure
In general, our investment adviser intends to select investments with financial covenants and
terms that reduce leverage over time, thereby enhancing credit quality. These methods include:
|
|
|
maintenance leverage covenants requiring a decreasing ratio of debt to cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
maintenance cash flow covenants requiring an increasing ratio of cash flow to the
sum of interest expense and capital expenditures; and |
|
|
|
|
debt incurrence prohibitions, limiting a companys ability to re-lever. |
In addition, limitations on asset sales and capital expenditures should prevent a company from
changing the nature of its business or capitalization without consent.
Our investment adviser seeks, where appropriate, to limit the downside potential of our
investments by:
|
|
|
requiring a total return on our investments (including both interest and
potential equity appreciation) that compensates us for credit risk; |
|
|
|
|
requiring companies to use a portion of their excess cash flow to repay debt; |
|
|
|
|
selecting investments with covenants that incorporate call protection as part of
the investment structure; and |
|
|
|
|
selecting investments with affirmative and negative covenants, default penalties,
lien protection, change of control provisions and board rights, including either
observation or participation rights. |
There may be certain restrictions on our investment advisers ability to negotiate and structure
the terms of our investments when we co-invest with other GSC Group-managed investment vehicles.
See Co-investment below.
7
Valuation process
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are recorded in our financial
statements at such market quotations subject to any decision by our Board of Directors to make a
fair value determination to reflect significant events affecting the value of these investments. We
value investments for which market quotations are not readily available quarterly at fair value as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors based on input from our investment adviser, our
audit committee and, if our board or audit committee so request, a third party independent
valuation firm. Determinations of fair value may involve subjective judgments and estimates. The
types of factors that may be considered in a fair value pricing include the nature and realizable
value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments, the markets in which the
portfolio company does business, market yield trend analysis, comparison to publicly traded
companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.
Our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO is carried at fair value, which is based
on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based
on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the
underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for similar CLO subordinated notes or equity, when
available.
We undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter when valuing investments for which
market quotations are not readily available, as described below:
|
|
|
each investment is initially valued by the responsible investment professionals
and preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with our senior
management; and |
|
|
|
|
an independent valuation firm engaged by our Board of Directors independently
values at least one quarter of our investments each quarter so that the valuation of
each investment for which market quotes are not readily available is independently
valued by an independent valuation firm at least annually. |
In addition, all our investments are subject to the following valuation process:
|
|
|
the audit committee of our Board of Directors reviews each preliminary valuation
and our investment adviser and independent valuation firm (if applicable) will
supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit
committee; and |
|
|
|
|
our Board of Directors discusses the valuations and determines the fair value of
each investment in good faith based on the input of our investment adviser, independent
valuation firm (if applicable) and audit committee. |
Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private
companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based
on estimates. The determination of fair value by our Board of Directors may differ materially from
the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset
value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our
investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the
disposal of such investments.
Ongoing relationships with and monitoring of portfolio companies
Our investment adviser will closely monitor each investment the Company makes and, when
appropriate, will conduct a regular dialogue with both the management team and other debtholders
and seek specifically tailored financial reporting. In addition, in certain circumstances, senior
investment professionals of GSC Group may take board seats or board observation seats.
Leverage
In addition to funds available from the issuance of our common stock, we use borrowed funds,
known as leverage, to make investments and to attempt to increase returns to our shareholders by
reducing our overall cost of capital. As a BDC, we are only allowed to employ leverage to the
extent that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after giving
effect to such leverage. As of February 28, 2009, our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940
Act, was 215%.
On April 11, 2007, we entered into a $100 million revolving securitized credit facility (the
Revolving Facility). On May 1, 2007, we entered into a $25.7 million term securitized credit
facility (the Term Facility and, together with the Revolving Facility, the
8
Facilities), which was fully drawn at closing. In December 2007, we consolidated the
Facilities by using a draw under the Revolving Facility to repay the Term Facility. Effective
January 14, 2009, we terminated the revolving period of the Revolving Facility and commenced a
two-year amortization period during which all principal proceeds from the collateral will be used
to repay outstanding borrowings. At the end of the two year amortization period, all advances will
be due and payable. In March 2009 we amended the Revolving Credit Facility to decrease the minimum
required collateralization and increase the portion of the portfolio that can be invested in CCC
rated investments in return for an increased interest rate and expedited amortization.
As of February 28, 2009, we had borrowed an aggregate of $59.0 million under the Revolving
Facility. Interest is payable on funds drawn under the Revolving Facility at the prevailing
commercial paper rates or, if the commercial paper market is at any time unavailable, the
prevailing LIBOR rates, plus 0.70%, payable monthly. The interest margin will increase from and
after the March 2009 amendment to 4.00% until March 2010 (6.00% if the commercial paper market is
unavailable) and 5.00% thereafter (6.00% if the commercial paper market is unavailable).
A significant percentage of our total investments have been pledged to secure our obligations
under the Revolving Facility.
In the interests of diversifying our sources of debt funding, we may in the future borrow from
and issue senior debt securities to banks and other lenders and/or securitize certain of our
portfolio investments, subject to our ability to satisfy the 1940 Act restrictions on BDCs.
Dividend
We intend to make quarterly distributions to our stockholders out of assets legally available
for distribution. Our quarterly distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board of
Directors. Any such distributions will be taxable to our stockholders, including to those
stockholders who receive additional shares of our common stock pursuant to a dividend reinvestment
plan.
In order to maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must for each fiscal year distribute an
amount equal to at least 90% of our ordinary net taxable income and realized net short-term capital
gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, reduced by deductible expenses.
In addition, we will be subject to federal excise taxes to the extent we do not distribute during
the calendar year at least (1) 98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year, (2) 98% of our
capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one year period ending on October 31 of the
calendar year and (3) any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years that were not
distributed during such years. To provide stability in our dividend distributions (which might
otherwise be adversely affected by timing mismatches between the receipt of payments on our
investments and the payment of dividends) we did not distribute all of our ordinary income earned
during the 2008 calendar year and incurred federal excise taxes as a result. There were no capital
gains in excess of capital losses realized during the one year period ended October 31, 2008. We
expect to declare dividends payable from 2008 calendar year earnings prior to November 15, 2009 and
to distribute such dividends prior to February 28, 2010. We may similarly withhold from
distribution a portion of our ordinary income for the 2009 calendar year and/or portion of the
capital gains in excess of capital losses realized during the one year period ending October 31,
2009, if any, and, if we do so, we would expect to incur federal excise taxes again as a result.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result,
if we declare a dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in
additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically opt out of the dividend
reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends.
We have distributed $2.58 per share of dividends to stockholders since we commenced operations
in March 2007. Please see Part II, Item 5 Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for additional details. We are
prohibited from making distributions that cause us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios
stipulated by the 1940 Act or that violate our debt covenants.
Subject to certain conditions, for taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2009, we are
permitted to make distributions to our stockholders in the form of shares of our common stock in
lieu of cash distributions. The decision to make such distributions will be made by our Board of
Directors.
About GSC Group
GSC Group was founded in 1999 by Alfred C. Eckert III, its Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer. GSC Group specializes in complex credit-based alternative investment strategies. GSC Group
is privately owned, has approximately 85 employees, and has
9
offices in New Jersey, New York and London. GSC Group conducts its investment advisory
business through GSCP (NJ), L.P., an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC) with approximately $8.2 billion of assets under
management(1) as of December 31, 2008.
GSC Group operates in two main business lines: (i) the corporate credit and distressed
investments group, which provides investment advisory and management services to the Company, which
is comprised of 19 investment professionals who manage approximately $7.4 billion of
assets(1) in various collateralized loan and debt obligation funds, credit funds,
control distressed debt funds and sponsors, provides administrative services to, and acts as
officers and directors of, a special acquisition company and (ii) the European Mezzanine Lending
group, which is comprised of 8 investment professionals who manage approximately $0.8 billion of
assets(1) in various mezzanine lending funds.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The methodology used by GSC Group to calculate its assets under management varies with the
nature of the account and represents (i) the sum of cash, uncalled capital commitments, as
applicable, and the market value of each investment or (ii) the principal balance of the
underlying assets adjusted for defaulted securities plus the market value of equity
securities, all as measured under the relevant account documents. In all cases, the fair value
(as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP) of the underlying assets may differ significantly
from the assets under management as forth above. Assets under management does not include
pooled investment vehicles comprised of asset-backed securities that are co-managed by GSC
Group with a sub-advisor |
Our investment adviser
Our Chairman, Richard M. Hayden, and Chief Executive Officer, Seth M. Katzenstein, are senior
managers of our investment adviser. Mr. Hayden is Vice Chairman of GSC Group, head of GSC Groups
European mezzanine lending group and serves on both the European CDO and European mezzanine lending
group credit committees. Mr. Katzenstein is a Senior Managing Director of GSC Group, a member of
the European mezzanine lending group and serves on both the GSC Investment Corp. and U.S. CDO
credit committees. Mr. Hayden and Mr. Katzenstein have over 35 years and 13 years experience in the
financial services industry, respectively. Mr. Hayden and Mr. Katzenstein are supported by the 19
investment professionals within GSC Groups corporate credit and distressed investments group.
Our investment adviser is responsible for administering our business activities and day-to-day
operations. Our investment adviser is able to leverage GSC Groups current investment platform,
resources and existing relationships with financial institutions, financial sponsors and investment
firms to provide us with attractive investment opportunities. In addition to deal flow, the GSC
Group investment platform assists our investment adviser in analyzing and monitoring investments.
In particular, these resources provide us with a wide variety of investment opportunities and
information that assists us in making investment decisions across our targeted asset classes, which
we believe provide us with a competitive advantage. GSC Group has been investing in corporate debt
since its founding in 1999. In addition to having access to GSC Groups investment professionals,
we also have access to GSC Groups administrative professionals who provide assistance in
accounting, legal, compliance and investor relations.
Our relationship with our investment adviser and GSC Group
We currently have no employees, and each of our executive officers is also an employee of GSC
Group. As of May 4, 2009, GSC Group and its affiliates owned 995,869 shares (12%) of our common
stock and senior employees of GSC Group (managing director and above) owned an additional 382,425
shares (4.6%) of our common stock. Some, but not all, of these persons are required to file
statements of beneficial ownership pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
Our investment advisory and management agreement with our investment adviser has been renewed
through March 21, 2010. Pursuant to the investment advisory and management agreement, our
investment adviser implements our business strategy on a day-to-day basis and performs certain
services for us, subject to oversight by our Board of Directors. Our investment adviser is
responsible for, among other duties, performing all of our day-to-day functions, determining
investment criteria, sourcing, analyzing and executing investments, asset sales, financings and
performing asset management duties. Under our investment advisory and management agreement, we have
agreed to pay our investment adviser an annual base management fee based on our total assets, as
defined under the 1940 Act (other than cash and cash equivalents but including assets purchased
with borrowed funds), and an incentive fee based on our performance. The investment advisory and
management agreement renews automatically for additional one-year terms at the end of each year
subject to certain approvals by our Board of Directors and/or our stockholders.
Pursuant to our investment advisory and management agreement, our investment adviser has
formed an investment committee to advise and consult with our investment advisers senior
management team with respect to our investment policies, investment
10
portfolio holdings, financing and leveraging strategies and investment guidelines. We believe
that the cumulative experience of the investment committee members across a variety of fixed income
asset classes benefits us. Along with GSC Groups U.S. corporate credit and distressed investments
groups investment staff, the investment committee monitors investments in our portfolio.
In April 2009, our investment adviser withheld a scheduled principal amortization payment
under its credit facility, resulting in a default thereunder. Our investment adviser has initiated
discussions with its secured lenders regarding a consensual restructuring of its obligations under
such credit facility. While we are not directly affected by our investment advisers default, if it
is unable to restructure its credit facility, or an acceleration of the outstanding principal
balance by the lenders occurs, the ability of the investment adviser to retain key individuals and
perform its investment advisory duties for us could be significantly impaired. A material adverse
change in the business, condition (financial or otherwise), operations or performance of our
investment adviser could constitute a default under our Revolving Facility.
Competitive advantages
We believe that through our relationship with GSC Group we enjoy several competitive
advantages over other capital providers to private middle market companies.
GSC Groups investment platform
GSC Group has a long history of strong performance across a broad range of asset classes and
sectors. The senior investment professionals of GSC Group have extensive experience investing in
leveraged loans, high-yield bonds, mezzanine debt and private equity. GSC Groups corporate credit
and distressed investments group has drawn from its extensive middle market investment experience
to develop a rigorous investment process that emphasizes detailed business and financial analysis
to minimize principal loss while maximizing risk adjusted returns.
Experience sourcing and managing middle market loans
GSC Groups U.S. corporate credit and distressed investments group has historically focused on
investments in private middle market companies and we expect to benefit from this experience. Our
investment adviser uses GSC Groups extensive network of relationships with intermediaries focused
on private middle market companies to attract well-positioned prospective portfolio company
investments. Since 2003, GSC Groups U.S. corporate credit and distressed investments group has
reviewed over 1,200 new middle market loan opportunities, including over 400 second lien loans. Of
the loans reviewed, approximately 350 were purchased by the group for the clients it advises,
including approximately 60 second lien loans.
Experienced management and investment committee
Seth M. Katzenstein, our Chief Executive Officer and a Senior Managing Director of GSC Group,
has over 13 years of financial services experience, having managed leveraged loan, high-yield bond,
mezzanine debt, distressed debt and private equity portfolios. In addition to Mr. Katzenstein, our
investment committee consists of Robert F. Cummings, Jr., a Director of the Company and a Senior
Managing Director of GSC Group, who has over 35 years experience in corporate finance, Michael R.
Lynch, a Senior Managing Director, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of GSC
Group, who has over 30 years corporate finance experience and Alexander B. Wright, a Managing
Director of GSC Group, who has over 15 years corporate finance experience.
Access to GSC Groups infrastructure
We have access to GSC Groups finance and administration infrastructure, which addresses
information technology, risk management, legal and compliance, and operational matters, and
promulgates and administers comprehensive policies and procedures regarding important investment
adviser matters, including portfolio management, trade allocation and execution and securities
valuation. We believe that the finance and administrative infrastructure established by GSC Group
is an important component of a complex investment vehicle such as a BDC. These systems support, and
are integrated with, our portfolio management functions.
We also have the benefit of the experience of GSC Groups senior professionals, many of whom
have served on public and private company boards and/or served in other senior management roles.
11
Compliance policies
GSC Group has designed a compliance program to monitor its conflict-resolution policies and
procedures and regularly evaluates the reasonableness of such policies and procedures. GSC Groups
compliance program monitors the implementation of and tests adherence to compliance-related
policies and procedures that address GSC Groups Code of Ethics and other compliance matters
including investment allocation, trade aggregation, best execution, cross trades and proxy voting
and related matters. The program is governed in part by the requirements of the 1940 Act and is
headed by GSC Groups Chief Compliance Officer.
Managerial assistance
As a BDC we offer, and must provide upon request, managerial assistance to our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things, monitoring the operations of our
portfolio companies, participating in board and management meetings, consulting with and advising
officers of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and financial guidance. Pursuant
to a separate administration agreement, our investment adviser (to the extent permitted under the
1940 Act) will provide such managerial assistance on our behalf to portfolio companies that request
this assistance, recognizing that our involvement with each investment will vary based on factors
including the size of the company, the nature of our investment, the companys overall stage of
development and our relative position in the capital structure. We may receive fees for these
services.
Competition
Our primary competitors in providing financing to private middle market companies include
public and private investment funds, commercial and investment banks and commercial financing
companies. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial
and marketing resources than us. For example, some competitors may have access to funding sources
that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances
or different risk assessments, which may allow them to consider a wider variety of investments.
Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940
Act imposes on us as a BDC. We expect to use GSC Groups knowledge and resources to learn about,
and compete effectively for, financing opportunities with attractive private middle market
companies in the industries in which we seek to invest. For additional information concerning the
competitive risks we face, please see Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors Risks related to our
business We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.
Staffing
We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees in the future.
Services necessary for our business will be provided by individuals who are employees of GSC Group,
pursuant to the terms of the investment advisory and management agreement and the administration
agreement. We reimburse GSC Group for our allocable portion of expenses incurred by it in
performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the cost of our officers and their respective staffs, subject to certain limitations.
The amount payable to GSC Group under the administration agreement is capped to the effect that
such amount, together with our other operating expenses, does not exceed an amount equal to 1.5%
per annum of our net assets attributable to common stock. In addition, during the initial term of
the administration agreement and the current renewal term (expiring March 2010), GSC Group has
agreed to waive our reimbursement obligation under the administration agreement until our total
assets exceed $500 million. From the commencement of operations until March 23, 2008, GSC Group
reimbursed us for operating expenses to the extent that our total annual operating expenses (other
than investment advisory and management fees and interest and credit facility expenses) exceeded an
amount equal to 1.55% of our net assets attributable to common stock.
Regulation
We have elected and qualified to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. As with other
companies regulated by the 1940 Act, a BDC must adhere to certain substantive regulatory
requirements. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between
BDCs and their affiliates (including any investment advisers or sub-advisers), principal
underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters, and requires that a majority of
the directors be persons other than interested persons, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act.
In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease
to be, or to withdraw our election as, a BDC, unless approved by a majority of our outstanding
voting securities. A majority of the outstanding voting securities of a company is defined under
the 1940 Act as the lesser of: (i) 67% or more of such companys stock present at a meeting if more
than 50% of the outstanding stock of such company is present and represented by proxy or (ii) more
than 50% of the outstanding stock of such company.
12
Under the 1940 Act, we may invest up to 100% of our assets in securities acquired directly
from issuers in privately negotiated transactions. With respect to such securities, we may, for the
purpose of public resale, be deemed a principal underwriter as that term is defined in the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).
Our intention is to not write (sell) or buy put or call options to manage risks associated
with the publicly traded securities of our portfolio companies, except that we may enter into
hedging transactions to manage the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. However, we
may purchase or otherwise receive warrants to purchase the common stock of our portfolio companies
in connection with acquisition financing or other investment. Similarly, in connection with an
acquisition, we may acquire rights to require the issuers of acquired securities or their
affiliates to repurchase them under certain circumstances.
We also do not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed the
limits imposed by the 1940 Act. Under these limits, we generally cannot acquire more than 3% of the
voting stock of any registered investment company, invest more than 5% of the value of our total
assets in the securities of one investment company or invest more than 10% of the value of our
total assets in the securities of investment companies in general. With regard to that portion of
our portfolio invested in securities issued by investment companies, it should be noted that such
investments might subject our stockholders to additional expenses. None of these policies are
fundamental and may be changed without stockholder approval.
Qualifying assets
Under the 1940 Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in
Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the
acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the companys total assets. The
principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our proposed business are the following:
|
(1) |
|
Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the
issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an
eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding
13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other
person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio
company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which: |
|
(a) |
|
is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business
in, the United States; |
|
|
(b) |
|
is not an investment company (other than a small business investment
company wholly owned by the BDC) or a company that would be an investment company
but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and |
|
|
(c) |
|
satisfies either of the following: |
|
(i) |
|
does not have any class of securities listed on a national
securities exchange; or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
has a class of securities listed on a national securities
exchange but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting
common equity of less than $250 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Securities of any eligible portfolio company which we control. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an
investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions
incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the
issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities was unable to meet its
obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending
or financing arrangements. |
|
|
(4) |
|
Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a
private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own
at least 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company. |
|
|
(5) |
|
Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to
securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of options,
warrants or rights relating to such securities. |
|
|
(6) |
|
Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. Government securities or high-quality debt
securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment. |
13
Managerial assistance to portfolio companies
In addition, a BDC must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the
United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities
described in (1), (2) or (3) above under Qualifying assets. However, in order to count
portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, the BDC must either
control the issuer of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the
securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial
assistance; except that, where the BDC purchases such securities in conjunction with one or more
other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such
managerial assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance means, among other
things, any arrangement whereby the BDC, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to
provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the
management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.
Temporary investments
As a BDC, pending investment in other types of qualifying assets, as described above, our
investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. Government securities or high-quality debt
securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, which we refer to,
collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets. Typically,
we will invest in U.S. Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements
are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. Government or its agencies. A
repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and
the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a
price which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest
rate. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in
such repurchase agreements. However, if more than 25% of our total assets constitute repurchase
agreements from a single counterparty, we would not meet the asset diversification requirements in
order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, we do not intend to enter
into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in excess of this limit. Our investment
adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we enter into repurchase
agreement transactions.
Indebtedness and senior securities
As a BDC, we are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of
indebtedness and one class of shares of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as
defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In
addition, while any indebtedness and senior securities remain outstanding, we must make provisions
to prohibit any distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or stock
unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase.
We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or emergency
purposes without regard to asset coverage. For a discussion of the risks associated with leverage,
please see Part 1, Item 1A Risk factors Risks related to our operation as a BDC Regulations
governing our operation as a BDC will affect our ability to, and the way in which we, raise
additional capital.
Code of ethics
As a BDC, we and our investment adviser have each adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule
17j-1 under the 1940 Act that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain
personal securities transactions. Personnel subject to each code may invest in securities for their
personal investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as
such investments are made in accordance with the codes requirements.
Proxy voting policies and procedures
SEC registered investment advisers that have the authority to vote (client) proxies (which
authority may be implied from a general grant of investment discretion) are required to adopt
policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the adviser votes proxies in the best
interests of its clients. Registered investment advisers also must maintain certain records on
proxy voting. In most cases, we will invest in securities that do not generally entitle us to
voting rights in its portfolio companies. When we do have voting rights, we will delegate the
exercise of such rights to our investment adviser.
Our investment adviser has particular proxy voting policies and procedures in place. In
determining how to vote, officers of our investment adviser will consult with each other and other
investment professionals of GSC Group, taking into account our interests
14
and the interests of our investors, as well as any potential conflicts of interest. Where
appropriate, our investment adviser will consult with legal counsel to identify potential conflicts
of interest. Where a potential conflict of interest exists, our investment adviser may, if it so
elects, resolve it by following the recommendation of a disinterested third party, by seeking the
direction of our independent directors or, in extreme cases, by abstaining from voting. While our
investment adviser may retain an outside service to provide voting recommendations and to assist in
analyzing votes, our investment adviser will not delegate its voting authority to any third party.
Privacy principles
We are committed to maintaining the privacy of our stockholders and to safeguarding their
non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what
personal information we collect, how we protect that information and why, in certain cases, we may
share information with select other parties.
Generally, we do not receive any non-public personal information relating to our stockholders,
although certain non-public personal information of our stockholders may become available to us. We
do not disclose any non-public personal information about our stockholders or former stockholders
to anyone, except as permitted by law, or as is necessary in order to service stockholder accounts
(for example, to a transfer agent or third party administrator).
We restrict access to non-public personal information about our stockholders to employees of
our investment adviser and its affiliates with a legitimate business need for the information. We
maintain appropriate physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to protect the
non-public personal information of our stockholders.
Other
As a BDC, we may be periodically examined by the SEC for compliance with the 1940 Act. Our
manager is a registered investment adviser and is also subject to examination by the SEC.
We are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance
company to protect us against larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a BDC, we are prohibited
from protecting any director or officer against any liability to us or our stockholders arising
from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved
in the conduct of such persons office.
We and our investment adviser are each required to adopt and implement written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws, review these
policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation,
and designate a chief compliance officer to be responsible for administering the policies and
procedures.
Co-investment
As a BDC, we are prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain
transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our independent directors, or in
some cases, the prior approval of the SEC. For example, any person that owns, directly or
indirectly, 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities is our affiliate for purposes of the
1940 Act and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such
affiliate, absent the prior approval of our independent directors. The 1940 Act also prohibits
joint transactions with an affiliate, which could include investments in the same portfolio
company (whether at the same or different times), without prior approval of our independent
directors and, in some cases, the SEC. If a person acquires more than 25% of our voting securities,
we are prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such person, or entering into
joint transactions with such person, absent the prior approval of the SEC. Similar restrictions
limit our ability to transact business with our officers or directors or their affiliates. As a
result, we will be limited in our ability to negotiate the term of any investment (except with
respect to price) in instances where we are participating in such investments with other funds
managed by GSC Group. Generally, we are prohibited from knowingly purchasing securities in a
primary offering from a portfolio company the securities of which are already held by GSC Group or
any other fund managed by GSC Group. However, if a portfolio company offers additional securities
and existing securities are held by us and GSC Group or other funds managed by GSC Group, then we
may participate in a follow-on investment in such securities on a pro-rata basis. We may also
purchase securities in the secondary market of a company, the securities of which are already held
by GSC Group or another fund managed by GSC Group.
The Company and GSC Group may in the future submit an exemptive application to the SEC to
permit greater flexibility to negotiate the terms of co-investments because we believe that it will
be advantageous for the Company to co-invest with funds managed by GSC Group where such investment
is consistent with the investment objectives, investment positions, investment
15
policies, investment strategies, investment restrictions, regulatory requirements and other
pertinent factors applicable to the Company. We believe that co-investment by the Company and funds
managed by GSC Group may afford the Company additional investment opportunities and the ability to
achieve greater diversification. Accordingly, any application would seek an exemptive order
permitting the Company to negotiate more than price terms when investing with funds managed by GSC
Group in the same portfolio companies. It is expected that any exemptive relief permitting
co-investments on those terms would be granted, if at all, only upon the conditions, among others,
that before such a co-investment transaction is effected, our investment adviser will make a
written investment presentation regarding the proposed co-investment to the independent directors
of the Company and the independent directors of the Company will review our investment advisers
recommendation.
Moreover, it is expected that prior to committing to such a co-investment, a required
majority (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of the independent directors of the Company
would conclude that (i) the terms of the proposed transaction are reasonable and fair to the
Company and its stockholders and do not involve overreaching of the Company and its stockholders on
the part of any person concerned; (ii) the transaction is consistent with the interests of the
stockholders of the Company and is consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the
Company; and (iii) the co-investment by any GSC Group fund would not disadvantage the Company in
making its investment, maintaining its investment position, or disposing of such investment and
that participation by the Company would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous than
that of the affiliated co-investor. There is no assurance that the application for exemptive relief
will be granted by the SEC or that, if granted, it will be on the terms set forth above.
Resolution of potential conflicts of interest; equitable allocation of investment
opportunities
Subject to the 1940 Act restrictions on co-investments with affiliates, GSC Group will offer
us the right to participate in all investment opportunities that it determines are appropriate for
us in view of our investment objectives, policies and strategies and other relevant factors,
subject to the exception that, in accordance with GSC Groups conflict of interest and allocation
policies, we might not participate in each individual opportunity but are, on an overall basis,
entitled to equitably participate with GSC Groups other funds or other clients.
We are GSC Groups principal investment vehicle for non-distressed second lien loans and
mezzanine debt of U.S. middle market entities. Although existing and future investment vehicles
managed or to be managed by GSC Group invest or may invest in mezzanine loans and second lien
loans, none of these investment vehicles target non-distressed domestic second lien and mezzanine
loans as the core of their portfolios. For example, while distressed debt funds managed by GSC
Groups corporate credit and distressed investments group may purchase second lien loans and
mezzanine debt of private middle market companies, these funds will typically be interested in
these assets in distressed situations, whereas we generally will seek to hold performing debt.
Likewise, due to the high amounts of leverage deployed by various CLO funds managed by GSC Group,
these funds tend to target first lien loans, while second lien and mezzanine loans are a secondary
part of the strategy.
To the extent that we do compete with any of GSC Groups clients for a particular investment
opportunity, our investment adviser will allocate the investment opportunity across the funds for
which the investment is appropriate based on its internal conflict of interest and allocation
policies consistent with the requirements of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the
Advisers Act), subject further to the 1940 Act restrictions on co-investments with affiliates and
also giving effect to priorities that may be enjoyed from to time to time by one or more funds
based on their investment mandate or guidelines, or any right of first review agreed to from time
to time by GSC Group. Currently GSC European Mezzanine Fund II, L.P. has a priority on investments
in mezzanine securities of issuers located primarily in Europe.
Subject to the foregoing, GSC Groups allocation policies are intended to ensure that we may
generally share equitably with other GSC Group-managed investment vehicles in investment
opportunities, particularly those involving a security with limited supply or involving differing
classes of securities of the same issuer, which may be suitable for us and such other investment
vehicles.
GSC Group has historically managed investment vehicles with similar or overlapping investment
strategies and has a conflict resolution policy in place that will also address the co-investment
restrictions under the 1940 Act. The policy is intended to ensure that we comply with the 1940 Act
restrictions on transactions with affiliates. These restrictions will significantly impact our
ability to co-invest with other GSC Groups funds. While the 1940 Act generally prohibits all
joint transactions between entities that share a common investment adviser, the staff of the SEC
has granted no-action relief to an investment adviser permitting purchases of a single class of
privately-placed securities, provided that the investment adviser negotiates no term other than
price and certain other conditions are satisfied. Neither our investment adviser nor any
participant in a co-investment will have both a material pecuniary incentive and ability to cause
us to participate with it in a co-investment. As a result, we only expect to co-invest on a
concurrent basis with GSC Groups funds when each fund will own the same securities of the issuer.
If opportunities arise that would otherwise be appropriate for us and for one or more of GSC
Groups other funds to invest in different securities of the same issuer, our investment adviser
will need to decide whether we or the other funds will proceed with the investment.
16
GSC Groups allocation procedures are designed to allocate investment opportunities among the
investment vehicles of GSC Group in a manner consistent with its obligations under the Advisers
Act. If two or more investment vehicles with similar investment strategies are still in their
investment periods, an available investment opportunity will be allocated as described below,
subject to any provisions governing allocations of investment opportunities in the relevant
organizational documents. As an initial step, our investment adviser will determine whether a
particular investment opportunity is an appropriate investment for us and its other clients and
typically will determine the amount that would be appropriate for each client by considering, among
other things, the following criteria:
|
(1) |
|
the investment guidelines and/or restrictions set forth in the applicable
organizational documents; |
|
|
(2) |
|
the risk and return profile of the client entity; |
|
|
(3) |
|
the suitability/priority of a particular investment for the client entity; |
|
|
(4) |
|
if applicable, the target position size of the investment for the client entity; |
|
|
(5) |
|
the level of available cash for investment with respect to the particular client
entity; |
|
|
(6) |
|
the total amount of funds committed to the client; and |
|
|
(7) |
|
the age of the fund and the remaining term of a funds investment period, if any. |
If there is an insufficient amount of an opportunity to satisfy the needs of all participants,
the investment opportunity will generally be allocated pro-rata based on the initial investment
amounts. Please see Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors There are conflicts of interest in our
relationship with our investment adviser and/or GSC Group, which could result in decisions that are
not in the best interests of our stockholders. Subject to applicable law, GSC Group may modify its
allocation procedures from time to time at its discretion.
Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance
regulations
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) imposes a wide variety of new
regulatory requirements on publicly-held companies and their insiders. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
requires us to review our policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the new regulations promulgated thereunder. We will continue to monitor our
compliance with all future regulations that are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take
actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith. We are not required to include an
attestation report of the Companys registered public accounting firm regarding internal control
over financial reporting in this Annual Report pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only managements report in this Annual
Report.
In addition, the New York Stock Exchange adopted corporate governance changes to its listing
standards in 2003. We believe we are in compliance with such corporate governance listing
standards. We will continue to monitor our compliance with all future listing standards and will
take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.
Available Information
We file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current periodic reports, proxy
statements and other information meeting the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements
and other information at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and other
information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following
e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public Reference Section, Washington,
D.C. 20549-0102. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed electronically by us with the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov. Our Internet address is http://www.gscinvestmentcorp.com. We
make available free of charge on our Internet website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
17
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. The risks set forth below are
not the only risks we face. If any of the following risks occur, our business and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading
price of our common stock could decline.
Risks related to current economic and market conditions
Economic recessions, including the current global recession, could impair our portfolio companies
and harm our operating results.
The U.S. economy is in the midst of a severe recession that is expected to continue until late
2009 or 2010. Many of the companies in which we have made or will make investments are susceptible
to economic slowdowns or recessions. An economic recession, including the current and any future
recessions or economic slowdowns, may affect the ability of a company to repay our loans or engage
in a liquidity event such as a sale, recapitalization, or initial public offering. Our
nonperforming assets are likely to increase and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease
during these periods. Current adverse economic conditions also have decreased the value of any
collateral securing our loans, if any, and a prolonged recession or depression may further decrease
such value. A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us
or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, acceleration of the time when the loans
are due and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other
agreements and jeopardize our portfolio companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt
that we hold and the value of any equity securities we own. We may incur expenses to the extent
necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio
company. These conditions are contributing to, and if prolonged could lead to further, losses of
value in our portfolio and a decrease in our revenues, net income, assets and net worth.
Declining asset values and illiquidity in the corporate debt markets have adversely affected, and
may continue to adversely affect, the fair value of our portfolio investments, reducing the value
of our assets.
As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is
ascertainable, at fair market value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors.
Decreases in the values of our investments are recorded as unrealized depreciation. The continuing
unprecedented declines in asset values and liquidity in the corporate debt markets have resulted in
significant net unrealized depreciation in our portfolio. As of February 28, 2009, conditions in
the debt markets had continued to deteriorate and pricing levels continued to decline. As a result,
we have incurred and, depending on market conditions, we may continue to incur, significant
unrealized depreciation in our portfolio, which could have a material adverse impact on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Ratings downgrades in our portfolio could require us to liquidate assets or face a default under
the Revolving Facility.
The amount that may be outstanding under our Revolving Facility at any time (our Borrowing
Base) is based on, among other things, the value of the pledged collateral. (See Part II, Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsFinancial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources in this Annual Report for details). If securities
deemed to have a rating of Caa2 or below by Moodys comprise in excess of 30% of the value of the
collateral, such excess Caa2 rated securities are deemed to have a value of zero when calculating
the Borrowing Base. The economic recession and resultant stress on our portfolio companies has
resulted in a large number of our portfolio companies being downgraded by one or more rating
agencies, and continued economic stress may result in additional downgrades in the future. As of
February 28, 2009, approximately 23.4% of the collateral was deemed to be rated Caa2 or below by
Moodys and a further 29.5% of the collateral was deemed to be rated Caa1. In some cases, we feel
that these ratings do not reflect the underlying strength of the investment; in other cases, we
feel that current market conditions preclude obtaining a fair sale price for the investment.
Once the 30% threshold is reached, any additional Caa2 downgrades would cause our Borrowing
Base to decrease, and may result in the Borrowing Base being less than our outstanding borrowings.
In such circumstances, we would be required to repay the excess borrowing within a prescribed time
limit or increase our Borrowing Base by pledging more collateral. Failure to cure a Borrowing Base
violation within the prescribed time limit constitutes a default under the Revolving Facility and
may result in an acceleration of all outstanding loans. If we are unable to promptly repay the
accelerated loans, our lenders could liquidate the collateral.
18
The current severe capital markets disruption has limited our ability to obtain new equity
capital and alternative sources of leverage.
The U.S. capital markets have been experiencing extreme volatility and disruption for more
than 12 months, as evidenced by a lack of liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant
write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of risk in the credit markets and the
failure of major financial institutions. This prolonged period of financial market illiquidity has
had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results
of operations. We have been unable to find new or alternative sources of leverage to supplement or
replace our Revolving Facility, which entered into its amortization period in January 2009. The
current bear market in equities has made equity capital difficult or impossible to raise, as our
stock has been trading below net asset value, and, under the 1940 Act, we are generally unable to
issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. If our lender is unable
to fund our existing debt in the commercial paper market, the cost of our Revolving Facility may
also increase. These events have, and will continue to have, negative repercussions on our
operating results and on our ability to grow.
Our common stock could be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange if our average market
capitalization over 30 consecutive trading days is below $15 million.
In order to maintain our listing on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), we must continue to
meet the NYSE minimum average market capitalization requirement. At February 28, 2009, our minimum
average market capitalization over the preceding 30 consecutive trading days was $19.5 million. If
the average market capitalization over 30 consecutive trading days falls below $15.0 million, our
common stock may be delisted, which could (i) reduce the liquidity and market price of our common
stock; (ii) negatively impact our ability to raise equity financing and access the public capital
markets; and (iii) materially adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Risks related to our business
We employ leverage.
We currently use the Revolving Facility to leverage our portfolio and we expect in the future
to borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks and other lenders and may securitize
certain of our portfolio investments.
With certain limited exceptions, as a BDC we are only allowed to borrow amounts such that our
asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% after such borrowing. The amount of
leverage that we employ will depend on our investment advisers and our Board of Directors
assessment of market conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. There is
no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful. Leverage involves risks and special
considerations for stockholders, including:
|
|
|
A likelihood of greater volatility in the net asset value and market price of our
common stock. |
|
|
|
|
Diminished operating flexibility as a result of asset coverage or investment
portfolio composition requirements that are more stringent than those imposed by the
1940 Act. |
|
|
|
|
The possibility that investments will have to be liquidated at less than full
value or at inopportune times to comply with debt covenants or to pay interest or
dividends on the leverage. |
|
|
|
|
Increased operating expenses due to the cost of leverage, including issuance and
servicing costs. |
|
|
|
|
Subordination to lenders superior claims on our assets as a result of which
lenders will be able to receive proceeds available in the case of our liquidation before
any proceeds are distributed to our shareholders. |
For example, the amount we may borrow under our Revolving Facility is determined, in part, by
the fair value of our investments. If the fair value of our investments declines, we may be forced
to sell investments at a loss to maintain compliance with our borrowing limits. Other debt
facilities we may enter into in the future may contain similar provisions. Any such forced sales
would reduce our net asset value and also make it difficult for the net asset value to recover.
Our investment adviser and our Board of Directors in their best judgment nevertheless may
determine to use leverage if they expect that the benefits to our stockholders of maintaining the
leveraged position will outweigh the risks.
19
We need to find alternative sources of leverage and/or access the equity markets to maintain and
grow our business.
Our Revolving Facility entered its amortization period effective January 14, 2009. During the
amortization period, all principal proceeds of our pledged investments are used to reduce the
outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. On the second anniversary of the
amortization period, all remaining outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility will
become due and payable. As a result of these mandatory repayments, our investment portfolio will
begin to de-leverage commencing with the payment of the first principal proceeds on our portfolio,
and must be completely deleveraged in two years, unless we can obtain an alternative source of
financing. Given the unfavorable conditions in the credit markets, there is no guarantee we will be
able to secure new financing in the immediate future or, if we are able to obtain financing, that
the terms of such financing will be commensurate with the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility.
Because our ability to generate net investment income is based, in part, on the use of relatively
inexpensive financing available under the Revolving Credit Facility to purchase portfolio assets,
the amortization of the Revolving Credit Facility will negatively impact our ability to generate
investment income (and pay dividends) in the future.
Because the amount of leverage we can employ is limited by the 1940 Act, our ability to grow
depends on raising additional equity capital notwithstanding the availability of additional
leverage. An inability to successfully access the capital markets will limit our ability to grow
our business and fully execute our business strategy.
Many of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our
Board of Directors; such valuations are inherently uncertain and may be materially higher or
lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.
A large percentage of our portfolio is, and we expect will continue to be, comprised of
investments that are not publicly traded. The value of investments that are not publicly traded may
not be readily determinable. We value these investments quarterly at fair value as determined in
good faith by our Board of Directors. Where appropriate, our Board of Directors may utilize the
services of an independent valuation firm to aid it in determining fair value. The types of factors
that may be considered in valuing our investments include the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which
the portfolio company does business, market yield trend analysis, comparison to publicly traded
companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and
particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may
fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair
value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these
investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations
regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we
ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.
We may be obligated to pay our investment adviser incentive compensation even if we incur a net
loss, regardless of the market value of our common stock.
Our investment adviser is entitled to incentive compensation for each fiscal quarter in an
amount equal to a percentage of the excess of our investment income for that quarter (before
deducting incentive compensation, net operating losses and certain other items) above a threshold
return for that quarter. Our pre-incentive fee net investment income, for incentive compensation
purposes, excludes realized and unrealized capital losses that we may incur in the fiscal quarter,
even if such capital losses result in a net loss on our statement of operations for that quarter.
Thus, we may be required to pay our investment adviser incentive compensation for a fiscal quarter
even if there is a decline in the value of our Portfolio or we incur a net loss for that quarter.
Under the investment advisory and management agreement, we will defer cash payment of any
incentive fee otherwise earned by our investment adviser if, during the most recent four full
quarterly periods ending on or prior to the date such payment is to be made, the sum of (a) our
aggregate distributions to our stockholders and (b) our change in net assets (defined as total
assets less liabilities) is less than 7.5% of our net assets at the beginning of such period. These
calculations will be appropriately pro rated during the first three quarters of this fiscal year
and will be adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases. Furthermore, the incentive fee that we
pay is not tied to the market value of our common stock.
If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it
is possible that accrued interest previously included in the calculation of the incentive fee will
become uncollectible. The investment adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any
part of the incentive fee it received that was based on accrued income that we never received as a
result of a default by an entity on the obligation that resulted in the accrual of such income.
20
Our investment advisers incentive compensation may cause it to pursue a high risk investment
strategy.
The incentive fee payable to the investment adviser may create an incentive for the investment
adviser to make investments that are riskier or more speculative than would be the case in the
absence of such compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee payable to the
investment adviser is determined (20% of the pre-incentive fee net investment income that exceeds a
hurdle rate of a 1.875% quarterly return on the value of net assets) may encourage the investment
adviser to use leverage to increase the return to the Companys investments. If the investment
adviser acquires poorly-performing assets with such leverage, the loss to holders of the shares
could be substantial. Moreover, if our leverage is increased, we will be exposed to increased risk
of loss, bear the increased cost of issuing and servicing such senior indebtedness, and will be
subject to any additional covenant restrictions imposed on us in an indenture or other instrument
or by the applicable lender. Our Board of Directors will monitor the conflicts presented by this
compensation structure by approving the amount of leverage that we may incur. In addition, the
investment adviser receives the incentive fee based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on
our investments. Unlike the portion of the incentive fee based on income, there is no hurdle rate
applicable to the portion of the incentive fee based on net capital gains. As a result, the
investment adviser may have a tendency to invest more in investments that are likely to result in
capital gains as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our
investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in
higher investment losses, particularly during economic downturns.
Our investment advisers base compensation may cause it to increase our leverage contrary to our
interest.
We pay the investment adviser a quarterly base management fee based on the value of our total
assets (including any assets acquired with leverage). Accordingly, the investment adviser has an
economic incentive to increase our leverage. Our Board of Directors monitors the conflicts
presented by this compensation structure by approving the amount of leverage that we incur. If our
leverage is increased, we will be exposed to increased risk of loss, bear the increase cost of
issuing and servicing such senior indebtedness, and will be subject to any additional covenant
restrictions imposed on us in an indenture or other instrument or by the applicable lender.
We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.
A number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we plan to make in
private middle market companies. We compete with other BDCs, public and private funds, commercial
and investment banks, commercial financing companies, insurance companies, high-yield investors,
hedge funds, and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity
funds. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial,
technical and marketing resources than us. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and
access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may
have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments that could allow them to consider a wider
variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our
competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a
BDC. As a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment
opportunities from time to time, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to identify and make
investments that meet our investment objectives.
We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer and we believe that
some of our competitors may make loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than the
rates we offer.
We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors pricing, terms and
structure. If we match our competitors pricing, terms and structure, we may experience decreased
net interest income and increased risk of credit loss. As a result of operating in such a
competitive environment, we may make investments that are on better terms to our portfolio
companies than we originally anticipated, which may impact our return on these investments.
We are a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, and therefore
are not limited with respect to the proportion of our assets that may be invested in securities of
a single issuer. To the extent that we assume large positions in the securities of a small number
of issuers, our net asset value may fluctuate to a greater extent than that of a diversified
investment company as a result of changes in the financial condition or the markets assessment of
the issuer. We may also be more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence than a
diversified investment company. However, we intend to comply with the diversification requirements
imposed by the Code for qualification as a RIC.
21
Our financial condition and results of operation depend on our ability to manage future growth
effectively.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives depends on our ability to acquire suitable
investments and monitor and administer those investments, which depends, in turn, on our investment
advisers ability to identify, invest in and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria.
Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our investment
advisers structuring of the investment process and its ability to provide competent, attentive and
efficient service to us. Our executive officers and the employees of our investment adviser have
substantial responsibilities in connection with their roles at GSC Group and with the other GSC
Group investment vehicles as well as responsibilities under the investment advisory and management
agreement. They may also be called upon to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio
companies. These demands on their time, which will increase as the number of investments grow, may
distract them or slow the rate of investment. In order to grow, our investment adviser may need to
hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. However, we cannot assure you that any such
employees will contribute to the work of the investment adviser. Any failure to manage our future
growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
There are conflicts of interest in our relationship with our investment adviser and/or GSC Group
that could cause them to make decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders.
Subject to the restrictions of the 1940 Act, we may co-invest in investments of portfolio
companies on a concurrent basis with other investment vehicles managed by GSC Group. Similarly a
GSC Group-managed investment vehicle may, in certain circumstances, invest in securities issued by
a company in which we have made, or are making, an investment. Similarly, in certain circumstances,
we may invest in securities issued by a company in which another GSC Group-managed investment
vehicle has made an investment. Although certain such investments may present conflicts of
interest, we nonetheless may pursue and consummate such transactions. These conflicts may include:
Co-Investment. We are prohibited from co-investing with other investment vehicles managed
now or in the future by GSC Group in certain investments of portfolio companies in instances
where GSC Group negotiates terms other than price. In instances where we co-invest with a GSC
Group-managed investment vehicle, while we will invest on the same terms and neither we nor the
GSC Group-managed investment vehicle may negotiate terms of the transaction other than price,
conflicts of interest may arise. For example, if an investee company in which both we and a GSC
Group-managed investment vehicle have invested becomes distressed, and the size of our relative
investments varies significantly, the decisions relating to actions to be taken could raise
conflicts of interest.
Conflicts in Different Parts of Capital Structure. If a portfolio company in which we and
another GSC Group-managed investment vehicle hold different classes of securities encounters
financial problems, decisions over the terms of any workout will raise conflicts of interest. For
example, a debt holder may be better served by a liquidation of the issuer in which it will be
paid in full, whereas an equity holder might prefer a reorganization that could create value for
the equity holder.
Potential Conflicting Positions. Given our investment objectives and the investment
objectives of other GSC Group-managed investment vehicles, it is possible that we may hold a
position that is contrary to a position held by another GSC Group-managed investment vehicle. For
example, we could hold a longer term investment in a certain portfolio company and at the same
time another GSC Group-managed investment vehicle could hold a short-term position in the same
company. GSC Group makes each investment decision separately based upon the investment objective
of each of its clients.
Shared Legal Counsel. We and other GSC Group-managed investment vehicles generally engage
common legal counsel in transactions in which both are participating or with respect to matters
that may affect both. Although separate counsel may be engaged, the time and cost savings and
other efficiencies and advantages of using common counsel will generally outweigh the
disadvantages. In the event of a significant dispute or divergence of interests, typically in a
work-out or other distressed situation, separate representation may become desirable, and in
litigation and other circumstances, separate representation may be necessary.
Allocation of Opportunities. Our investment adviser provides investment management,
investment advice or other services in relation to a number of investment vehicles that focus on
corporate credit, distressed debt, mezzanine investments and structured finance products and have
investment objectives that are similar to or overlap with ours. Investment opportunities that may
be of interest to us may also be of interest to GSC Groups other investment vehicles, and GSC
Group may buy or sell securities for us which differ from securities which they may cause to be
bought or sold for other investment vehicles. GSC Group has greater
22
interests in other investment vehicles it manages, including greater capital commitments to,
or larger fees earned from, such investment vehicles. These differing interests may create a
conflict of interest for GSC Group in determining which investment vehicle should pursue a given
investment opportunity.
Material Nonpublic Information. GSC Group or its employees, officers, principals or
affiliates may come into possession of material nonpublic information in connection with business
activities unrelated to our operations. The possession of such information may limit our ability
to buy or sell securities or otherwise participate in an investment opportunity or to take other
action it might consider in our best interest.
Cross-Trading. Subject to applicable law, we may engage in transactions directly with other
investment vehicles managed by GSC Group, including the purchase or sale of all or a portion of a
portfolio investment. Cross-trades can save us brokerage commissions and, in certain cases,
related transaction costs. Cross-trades between affiliates may create conflicts of interest with
respect to certain terms of the transaction, including price. The 1940 Act imposes substantial
restrictions on cross-trades between us and investment vehicles managed by GSC Group. As a
result, our Board of Directors has adopted cross-trading procedures designed to ensure compliance
with the requirements of the 1940 Act and will regularly review the terms of any cross-trades.
We may compete with investment vehicles of GSC Group for access to GSC Group.
Our investment adviser and its affiliates have sponsored and currently manage other investment
vehicles with an investment focus that overlaps with our focus, and may in the future sponsor or
manage additional investment vehicles with an overlapping focus to ours, which, in each case, could
result in us competing for access to the benefits that we expect our relationship with GSC Group to
provide to us.
We are dependent upon our investment adviser and its personnel.
We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of GSC Groups investment
professionals and the information and deal flow generated by them in the course of their investment
and portfolio management activities. The departure of a significant number of the investment
professionals of GSC Group could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our
investment objectives. In addition, we cannot assure you that our investment adviser will remain
our investment adviser or that we will continue to have access to GSC Groups investment
professionals or its information and deal flow. In April 2009, our investment adviser withheld a
scheduled principal amortization payment under its credit facility, resulting in a default
thereunder. Our investment adviser has initiated discussions with its secured lenders regarding a
consensual restructuring of its obligations under such credit facility. While we are not directly
affected by our investment advisers default, if it is unable to restructure its credit facility,
or an acceleration of the outstanding principal balance by the lenders occurs, the ability of the
investment adviser to retain key individuals and perform its investment advisory duties for us
could be significantly impaired. A material adverse change in the business, condition (financial or
otherwise), operations or performance of our investment adviser could constitute a default under
our Revolving Facility.
We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.
General interest rate fluctuations and changes in credit spreads on floating rate loans may
have a substantial negative impact on our investments and investment opportunities and,
accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on investment objectives and our rate of return on
invested capital. In addition, an increase in interest rates would make it more expensive to use
debt to finance our investments. Decreases in credit spreads on debt that pays a floating rate of
return would have an impact on the income generation of our floating rate assets. Trading prices
for debt that pays a fixed rate of return tend to fall as interest rates rise. Trading prices tend
to fluctuate more for fixed-rate securities that have longer maturities. Although we have no policy
governing the maturities of our investments, under current market conditions we expect that we will
invest in a portfolio of debt generally having maturities of up to ten years. This means that we
will be subject to greater risk (other things being equal) than an entity investing solely in
shorter-term securities. A decline in the prices of the debt we own could adversely affect the
trading price of our common stock.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of
factors, including the interest rate payable on the debt investments we make, the default rate on
such investments, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of
realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our
markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period
should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.
23
Our investment advisers liability is limited under the investment advisory and management
agreement and we will indemnify our investment adviser against certain liabilities, which may
lead our investment adviser to act in a riskier manner on our behalf than it would when acting
for its own account.
Our investment adviser has not assumed any responsibility to us other than to render the
services described in the investment advisory and management agreement. Pursuant to the investment
advisory and management agreement, our investment adviser and its general partner, officers and
employees are not liable to us for their acts, under the investment advisory and management
agreement, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard in the
performance of their duties. We have agreed to indemnify, defend and protect our investment adviser
and its general partner, officers and employees with respect to all damages, liabilities, costs and
expenses resulting from acts of our investment adviser not arising out of willful misfeasance, bad
faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard in the performance of their duties under the
investment advisory and management agreement. These protections may lead our investment adviser to
act in a riskier manner when acting on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations, or changes in the interpretation
thereof, and any failure by us to comply with laws or regulations governing our operations may
adversely affect our business.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation at the local, state and federal
levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to
time. Any change in these laws or regulations, or their interpretation, or any failure by us to
comply with these laws or regulations may adversely affect our business.
As discussed below, there is a risk that certain investments that we intend to treat as
qualifying assets will be determined to not be eligible for such treatment. Any such determination
would have a material adverse effect on our business.
We have a limited operating history.
We were incorporated in March 2007 and commenced our operations that same month. We are
subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any new business, including
the risk that we may not achieve our investment objectives and that the value of your investment
could decline substantially.
Risks related to our operation as a BDC
Our common stock may trade at a discount to our net asset value per share.
Common stock of BDCs, as closed-end investment companies, frequently trade at a discount to
net asset value. Our common stock has traded at a discount to our net asset value since shortly
after our initial public offering. The risk that our common stock may continue to trade at a
discount to our net asset value is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per
share may decline.
Regulations governing our operation as a BDC will affect our ability to raise additional capital.
We have incurred indebtedness under the Revolving Facility and we may issue debt securities or
preferred stock, which we refer to collectively as senior securities, up to the maximum amount
permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to
incur indebtedness or issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as
defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such incurrence or issuance. If the value of
our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test, which could prohibit us from paying
dividends and prevent us from qualifying as a RIC. If we cannot satisfy this test, we may be
required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a
portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous.
We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value
per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our
common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock if our Board of
Directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our
stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our
securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of
our Board of Directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any
commission or discount). If our common stock trades at a discount to net asset value, this
restriction could adversely affect our ability to raise capital.
24
To generate cash for funding new investments, we pledged a substantial portion of our
portfolio investments under the Revolving Facility. Such assets are not available to secure other
sources of funding or for securitization. Our ability to obtain additional secured or unsecured
financing on attractive terms in the future is uncertain. Alternatively, we may in the future seek
to securitize a portion of our loan portfolio. The loan and securitization markets are subject to
changing market conditions, however, and we may not be able to access this market when we would
otherwise deem appropriate. An inability to obtain additional leverage through secured or unsecured
financing or securitization of our loan portfolio could limit our ability to grow our business,
fully execute our business strategy and decrease our earnings, if any. We may also face a
heightened risk of loss to the extent we hold a first loss position in a securitized loan
portfolio. The 1940 Act may also impose restrictions on the structure of any securitization.
There is a risk that you may not receive distributions or that our distributions may not grow
over time.
As a BDC for 1940 Act purposes and a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we intend to
make distributions out of assets legally available for distribution on a quarterly basis to our
stockholders once such distributions are authorized by our Board of Directors and declared by us.
We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified
level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. In addition, due to
the asset coverage test that is applicable to us as a BDC, we may be limited in our ability to make
distributions. Further, if we invest a greater amount of assets in equity securities that do not
pay current dividends, it could reduce the amount available for distribution.
Our investment adviser has limited experience in managing a BDC.
The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of BDCs. For example, BDCs are
required to invest at least 70% of their total assets primarily in securities of private U.S.
operating companies or public U.S. companies whose securities are not listed on a national
securities exchange registered under the Exchange Act (i.e., NYSE, American Stock Exchange and The
NASDAQ Global Market), cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high quality debt
investments that mature in one year or less. Our investment adviser does not manage any BDCs other
than the Company, and the Company has been in operation only since March 2007. Our investment
advisers limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets under such constraints may hinder
its ability to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve our
investment objectives.
A failure on our part to maintain our qualification as a BDC would significantly reduce our
operating flexibility.
If we fail to qualify as a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under
the 1940 Act, which would significantly decrease our operating flexibility.
We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we fail to qualify as a RIC.
We will seek to qualify as a RIC under the Code, which requires us to qualify continuously as
a BDC and meet certain source of income, distribution and asset diversification requirements.
The source of income requirement is satisfied if we derive at least 90% of our annual gross
income from interest, dividends, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the
sale or other disposition of securities or options thereon or foreign currencies, or other income
derived with respect to our business of investing in such securities or currencies, and net income
from interests in qualified publicly traded partnerships, as defined in the Code.
The annual distribution requirement is satisfied if we distribute to our stockholders on an
annual basis an amount equal to at least 90% of our ordinary net taxable income and realized net
short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, reduced by
deductible expenses. We are subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act
and covenants under the Facilities that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making
distributions necessary to qualify as a RIC. In such case, if we are unable to obtain cash from
other sources, we may fail to qualify as a RIC and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income
tax.
To qualify as a RIC, we must also meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end
of each calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our having to (i) dispose of
certain investments quickly or (ii) raise additional capital to prevent the loss of our RIC
qualification. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, any such dispositions
could be made at disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If we raise
additional capital to satisfy the asset diversification requirements, it could take us time to
invest such capital. During this period, we will invest the additional capital in temporary
investments, such as cash and cash equivalents, which we expect will earn yields substantially
lower than the interest income that we anticipate receiving in respect of investments in first and
second lien loans, mezzanine debt and high yield debt.
25
If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason, all of our taxable income will be subject to
U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates. The resulting corporate taxes could
substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount
of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and our
stockholders.
As a BDC, we may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before
or without receiving cash in respect of such income.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain amounts that we have not
yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in
connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, or contracted paid-in-kind
interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the
loan term. Such original issue discount, which could be significant relative to our overall
investment activities, or increases in loan balances will be included in income before we receive
any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts
that we will not receive in cash, including, for example, non-cash income from paid-in-kind
securities and deferred payment securities. In addition, we will consolidate GSCIC CLO for federal
income tax purposes, and income earned thereon may differ from the distributions paid in respect of
our investment in the GSCIC CLO subordinated notes because of the factors set forth above or
because distributions on the subordinated notes are contractually required to be diverted for
reinvestment or to pay down outstanding indebtedness.
Since in certain cases we may recognize income before or without receiving cash in respect of
such income, we may have difficulty meeting the requirement that we distribute an amount equal to
at least 90% of our ordinary net taxable income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess
of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, reduced by deductible expenses, to qualify as a
RIC. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments (or investments in the GSCIC CLO
portfolio) at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or
reduce new investments to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash
from other sources, or are restricted from selling investments in the GSCIC CLO portfolio by the
terms of the applicable indenture, we may fail to qualify as a RIC and thus be subject to
corporate-level income tax.
If our primary investments are deemed not to be qualifying assets, we could fail to qualify as a
BDC or be precluded from investing according to our current business plan.
If we are to maintain our qualification as a BDC, we must not acquire any assets other than
qualifying assets unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least
70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. We believe that the leveraged loans and mezzanine
investments that we propose to acquire constitute qualifying assets because, at the time of our
investment, the privately held issuers will not have securities listed on a national securities
exchange and the publicly traded issuers will have a market capitalization of less than $250
million.
The floating interest rate features of any indebtedness incurred by us could adversely affect us
if interest rates rise.
Any indebtedness incurred by us will likely bear interest at a floating rate based on an
index. As a result, if that index increases, our costs under any indebtedness incurred would become
more expensive, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings.
Risks related to our investments
Our investments may be risky, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Substantially all of the debt investments held in the portfolio hold, and will likely continue
to hold, a non-investment grade rating by Moodys and/or Standard & Poors or, where not rated by
any rating agency, would be below investment grade, if rated. High yield bonds rated below
investment grade are commonly referred to as junk bonds. A below investment grade rating means
that, in the rating agencys view, there is an increased risk that the obligor on such debt will be
unable to pay interest and repay principal on its debt in full. We may also invest in debt that
defers or pays paid-in-kind interest. To the extent interest payments associated with such debt are
deferred, such debt will be subject to greater fluctuations in value based on changes in interest
rates, such debt could produce taxable income without a corresponding cash payment to us, and since
we generally do not receive any cash prior to maturity of the debt, the investment will be of
greater risk.
26
In addition, private middle market companies in which we expect to invest are exposed to a
number of significant risks, including:
|
|
|
limited financial resources and an inability to meet their obligations, which may
be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the
likelihood of us realizing any guarantees we may have obtained in connection with our
investment; |
|
|
|
|
shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares
than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors
actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; the
death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of which could have a
material adverse impact on the company and, in turn, on us; |
|
|
|
|
less predictable operating results and, possibly, substantial additional capital
requirements to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their
competitive position.; and |
|
|
|
|
difficulty accessing the capital markets to meet future capital needs. |
In addition, our executive officers, directors and our investment adviser may, in the ordinary
course of business, be named as defendants in litigation arising from our investments in the
portfolio companies.
The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.
We expect to make investments in private companies. A portion of these securities may be
subject to legal and other restrictions on resale, transfer, pledge or other disposition or will
otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may
make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are
required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less
than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments. In addition, we may face other
restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a business entity to the extent that we
or our investment adviser has or could be deemed to have material non-public information regarding
such business entity.
The debt securities in which we invest are subject to credit risk and prepayment risk.
An issuer of debt security may be unable to make interest payments and repay principal. We
could lose money if the issuer of a debt obligation is, or is perceived to be, unable or unwilling
to make timely principal and/or interest payments, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The
downgrade of a security by rating agencies may further decrease its value.
Certain debt instruments may contain call or redemption provisions which would allow the
issuer thereof to prepay principal prior to the debt instruments stated maturity. This is known as
prepayment risk. Prepayment risk is greater during a falling interest rate environment as issuers
can reduce their cost of capital by refinancing higher interest debt instruments with lower
interest debt instruments. An issuer may also elect to refinance their debt instruments with lower
interest debt instruments if the credit standing of the issuer improves. To the extent debt
securities in our portfolio are called or redeemed, we may receive less than we paid for such
security and we may be forced to reinvest in lower yielding securities or debt securities of
issuers of lower credit quality.
Our investment in GSCIC CLO constitutes a leveraged investment in a portfolio of predominantly
senior secured first lien term loans and is subject to additional risks and volatility.
At February 28, 2009, our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO had a fair value
of $22.3 million and constituted 18.8% of our portfolio. This investment constitutes a first loss
position in a portfolio that, as of February 28, 2009, was composed of $416.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of primarily senior secured first lien term loans and $9.4 million in uninvested
cash. Interest payments generated from this portfolio will be used to pay the administrative
expenses of GSCIC CLO and interest on the debt issued by GSCIC CLO before paying a return on the
subordinated notes. Principal payments will be similarly applied to pay administrative expenses of
GSCIC CLO and for reinvestment or repayment of GSCIC CLO debt before paying a return on, or
repayment of, the subordinated notes. In addition, 80% of our fixed management fee and 100% our
incentive management fee is subordinated to the payment of interest and principal on GSCIC CLOs
debt. Any losses on the portfolio will accordingly reduce the cash flow available to pay these
management fees and provide a return on, or repayment of, our investment. Depending on the amount
and timing of such losses we may experience smaller than expected returns and, potentially, the
loss of our entire investment.
27
As the manager of the portfolio, we will have some ability to direct the composition of the
portfolio, but our discretion is limited by the terms of the debt issued by GSCIC CLO, which may
limit our ability to make investments that we feel are in the best interests of the subordinated
notes, and the availability of suitable investments. The performance of the portfolio is also
subject to many of the same risks sets forth in this Annual Report with respect to portfolio
investments in senior secured first lien term loans.
Available information about privately held companies is limited.
We invest primarily in privately-held companies. Generally, little public information exists
about these companies, and we are required to rely on the ability of our investment advisers
investment professionals to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from
investing in these companies. These companies and their financial information are not subject to
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other rules that govern public companies. If we are unable to uncover
all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment
decision, and we may lose money on our investments.
When we are a debt or minority equity investor in a portfolio company, we may not be in a
position to control the entity, and its management may make decisions that could decrease the
value of our investment.
We anticipate making both debt and minority equity investments; therefore, we will be subject
to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree, and the
stockholders and management of such company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not
serve our interests. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions that could decrease the
value of our portfolio holdings.
Our portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities that rank equally with, or
senior to, our investments in such companies.
Our portfolio companies usually will have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt, or issue
other equity securities that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments. By their terms, such
instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to receive payment of dividends, interest or
principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of our
investments. These debt instruments will usually prohibit the portfolio companies from paying
interest on or repaying our investments in the event and during the continuance of a default under
such debt. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy
of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio
company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution
in respect of our investment. After repaying such holders, the portfolio company may not have any
remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debtor equity ranking
equally with our investments, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other
holders in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of
the relevant portfolio company.
There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other
creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.
If one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though we may have structured our
interest as senior debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we
actually provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might
recharacterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other
creditors. In addition, lenders can be subject to lender liability claims for actions taken by them
where they become too involved in the borrowers business or exercise control over the borrower. It
is possible that we could become subject to a lenders liability claim, including as a result of
actions taken if we actually render significant managerial assistance.
Investments in equity securities involve a substantial degree of risk.
We may purchase common stock and other equity securities. Although equity securities have
historically generated higher average total returns than fixed-income securities over the
long-term, equity securities also have experienced significantly more volatility in those returns
and in recent years have significantly under performed relative to fixed-income securities. The
equity securities we acquire may fail to appreciate and may decline in value or become worthless
and our ability to recover our investment will depend on our portfolio companys success.
Investments in equity securities involve a number of significant risks, including:
|
|
|
any equity investment we make in a portfolio company could be subject to further
dilution as a result of the issuance of additional equity interests and to serious risks
as a junior security that will be subordinate to all indebtedness or senior securities
in the event that the issuer is unable to meet its obligations or becomes subject to a
bankruptcy process; |
28
|
|
|
to the extent that the portfolio company requires additional capital and is
unable to obtain it, we may not recover our investment in equity securities; and |
|
|
|
|
in some cases, equity securities in which we invest will not pay current
dividends, and our ability to realize a return on our investment, as well as to recover
our investment, will be dependent on the success of our portfolio companies. Even if the
portfolio companies are successful, our ability to realize the value of our investment
may be dependent on the occurrence of a liquidity event, such as a public offering or
the sale of the portfolio company. It is likely to take a significant amount of time
before a liquidity event occurs or we can sell our equity investments. In addition, the
equity securities we receive or invest in may be subject to restrictions on resale
during periods in which it could be advantageous to sell. |
There are special risks associated with investing in preferred securities, including:
|
|
|
preferred securities may include provisions that permit the issuer, at its
discretion, to defer distributions for a stated period without any adverse consequences
to the issuer. If we own a preferred security that is deferring its distributions, we
may be required to report income for tax purposes even though we have not received any
cash payments in respect of such income; |
|
|
|
|
preferred securities are subordinated with respect to corporate income and
liquidation payments, and are therefore subject to greater risk than debt; |
|
|
|
|
preferred securities may be substantially less liquid than many other securities,
such as common securities or U.S. government securities; and |
|
|
|
|
preferred security holders generally have no voting rights with respect to the
issuing company, subject to limited exceptions. |
Our investments in foreign debt, including that of emerging market issuers, may involve
significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.
Although there are limitations on our ability to invest in foreign debt, we may, from time to
time, invest in debt of foreign companies, including the debt of emerging market issuers. Investing
in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in
U.S. companies. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social
instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available
information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, less
government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws,
difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards
and greater price volatility. Investments in the debt of emerging market issuers may subject us to
additional risks such as inflation, wage and price controls, and the imposition of trade barriers.
Furthermore, economic conditions in emerging market countries are, to some extent, influenced by
economic and securities market conditions in other emerging market countries. Although economic
conditions are different in each country, investors reaction to developments in one country can
have effects on the debt of issuers in other countries.
Although most of our investments will be U.S. dollar-denominated, our investments that are
denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular
currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may affect
currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative
values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and
capital appreciation, and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize
these risks, but we cannot assure you that we will fully hedge against these risks or that such
strategies will be effective.
We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.
We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate
swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our
portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Use of these
hedging instruments may expose us to counter-party credit risk. Hedging against a decline in the
values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values
of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging
can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the
decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the
opportunity for gain if the values of the portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not
be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is generally
anticipated at an acceptable price.
29
Our Board of Directors may change our operating policies and strategies without prior notice or
stockholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse.
Our Board of Directors has the authority to modify or waive our current operating policies and
our strategies without prior notice and without stockholder approval. We cannot predict the effect
any changes to our current operating policies and strategies would have on our business, financial
condition, and value of our common stock. However, the effects might be adverse, which could
negatively impact our ability to pay dividends and cause you to lose all or part of your
investment.
Risks related to an investment in our shares
Investing in our common stock may involve an above average degree of risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment objectives may result in a higher
amount of risk than alternative investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our
investments in portfolio companies may be highly speculative and aggressive, and therefore, an
investment in our common stock may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
The market price and liquidity of the market for our common stock may be significantly
affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related
to our operating performance. These factors include:
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of
BDCs or other companies in our sector, which are not necessarily related to the
operating performance of these companies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies or tax rules, particularly with respect to RICs or
BDCs; |
|
|
|
|
loss of RIC qualification; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of our portfolio of investments; |
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels
expected by investors or securities analysts; |
|
|
|
|
departure of our investment advisers key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
operating performance of companies comparable to us; |
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors; and |
|
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source. |
Provisions of our governing documents and the Maryland General Corporation Law could deter
takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.
We are governed by our charter and bylaws, which we refer to as our governing documents.
Our governing documents and the Maryland General Corporation Law contain provisions that may
have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control of us
that might involve a premium price for our stockholders or otherwise be in their best interest.
Our charter provides for the classification of our Board of Directors into three classes of
directors, serving staggered three-year terms, which may render a change of control of us or
removal of our incumbent management more difficult. Furthermore, any and all vacancies on our Board
of Directors will be filled generally only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining
directors in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director
elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term until a successor is
elected and qualifies.
30
Our Board of Directors is authorized to create and issue new series of shares, to classify or
reclassify any unissued shares of stock into one or more classes or series, including preferred
stock and, without stockholder approval, to amend our charter to increase or decrease the number of
shares of stock that we have authority to issue, which could have the effect of diluting a
stockholders ownership interest. Prior to the issuance of shares of stock of each class or series,
including any reclassified series, our Board of Directors is required by our governing documents to
set the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as
to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each
class or series of shares of stock.
Our governing documents also provide that our Board of Directors has the exclusive power to
adopt, alter or repeal any provision of our bylaws, and to make new bylaws. The Maryland General
Corporation Law also contains certain provisions that may limit the ability of a third party to
acquire control of us, such as:
|
|
|
The Maryland Business Combination Act, which, subject to certain limitations,
prohibits certain business combinations between us and an interested stockholder
(defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power
of the common stock or an affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date
on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder and, thereafter, imposes
special minimum price provisions and special stockholder voting requirements on these
combinations; and |
|
|
|
|
The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, which provides that control shares
of a Maryland corporation (defined as shares of common stock which, when aggregated with
other shares of common stock controlled by the stockholder, entitles the stockholder to
exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired
in a control share acquisition (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of
ownership or control of control shares) have no voting rights except to the extent
approved by stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares of common stock. |
The provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act will not apply, however, if our Board
of Directors adopts a resolution that any business combination between us and any other person will
be exempt from the provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act. Although our Board of
Directors has adopted such a resolution, there can be no assurance that this resolution will not be
altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time. If the resolution is altered or repealed, the
provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act may discourage others from trying to acquire
control of us.
As permitted by Maryland law, our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Maryland
Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our common stock. Although
our bylaws include such a provision, such a provision may also be amended or eliminated by our
Board of Directors at any time in the future.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We do not own any real estate or physical properties materially important to our business. Our
corporate office is located at 888 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019. Our telephone number
is (212) 884-6200. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate for our business
as currently conducted and as reasonably foreseeable.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Neither we nor our investment adviser are currently subject to any material legal proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of stockholders through the solicitation of proxies or
otherwise during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.
31
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Price range of common stock
Our common stock is quoted on the NYSE under the symbol GNV and started trading on March 23,
2007 at an initial public offering price of $15.00 per share. Prior to such date there was no
public market for our common stock. Set forth below are the high and low sales prices for our
common stock for each full quarterly period since our common stock began trading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range |
Fiscal 2008 |
|
NAV(1) |
|
High |
|
Low |
First Quarter |
|
$ |
14.21 |
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.57 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
13.76 |
|
|
$ |
14.06 |
|
|
$ |
10.74 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
13.51 |
|
|
$ |
12.75 |
|
|
$ |
10.92 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
|
$ |
11.43 |
|
|
$ |
9.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
NAV(1) |
|
High |
|
Low |
First Quarter |
|
$ |
11.75 |
|
|
$ |
10.67 |
|
|
$ |
9.30 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
11.05 |
|
|
$ |
11.05 |
|
|
$ |
9.16 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
10.14 |
|
|
$ |
10.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
8.20 |
|
|
$ |
3.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in the relevant quarter and
therefore may not reflect the net asset value per share on the date of the high and low
closing sales prices. The net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at the end of
each period. |
Holders
As of May 4, 2009, there were 16 holders of record and approximately 3400 beneficial holders
of our common stock.
Dividend Policy
Set forth below are the cash dividends declared by the Company since March 23, 2007, the date
on which we commenced operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Date Declared |
|
Record Date |
|
Payment Date |
|
per Share |
|
May 21, 2007 |
|
May 29, 2007 |
|
June 6, 2007 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
August 14, 2007 |
|
August 24, 2007 |
|
August 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
November 15, 2007 |
|
November 30, 2007 |
|
December 3, 2007 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
December 28, 2007 |
|
January 18, 2008 |
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
February 20, 2008 |
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
March 10, 2008 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 22, 2008 |
|
May 30, 2008 |
|
June 13, 2008 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
August 19, 2008 |
|
August 29, 2008 |
|
September 15, 2008 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
December 8, 2008 |
|
December 18, 2008 |
|
December 29, 2008 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We intend to make quarterly distributions to our stockholders out of assets legally available
for distribution. Our quarterly distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board of
Directors. Any such distributions will be taxable to our stockholders, including to those
stockholders who receive additional shares of our common stock pursuant to a dividend reinvestment
plan. We are prohibited from making distributions that cause us to fail to maintain the asset
coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act or that violate our debt covenants.
32
In order to maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must for each fiscal year distribute an
amount equal to at least 90% of our ordinary net taxable income and realized net short-term capital
gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, reduced by deductible expenses.
In addition, we will be subject to federal excise taxes to the extent we do not distribute during
the calendar year at least (1) 98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year, (2) 98% of our
capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one year period ending on October 31 of the
calendar year and (3) any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years that were not
distributed during such years. To provide stability in our dividend distributions (which might
otherwise be adversely affected by timing mismatches between the receipt of payments on our
investments and the payment of dividends) we did not distribute all of our ordinary income earned
during the 2008 calendar year and incurred federal excise taxes as a result. There were no capital
gains in excess of capital losses realized during the one year period ended October 31, 2008. We
expect to declare dividends payable from 2008 calendar year earnings prior to November 15, 2009 and
to distribute such dividends prior to February 28, 2010. We may similarly withhold from
distribution a portion of our ordinary income for the 2009 calendar year and/or portion of the
capital gains in excess of capital losses realized during the one year period ending October 31,
2009, if any, and, if we do so, we would expect to incur federal excise taxes again as a result.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result,
if we declare a dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in
additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically opt out of the dividend
reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends. GSC Group, and the funds managed by it, do not
currently participate in the dividend reinvestment plan with respect to their holdings of the
companys common stock.
Subject to certain conditions, for taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2009, we are
permitted to make distributions to our stockholders in the form of shares of our common stock in
lieu of cash distributions. The decision to make such distributions will be made by our Board of
Directors.
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the return on our common stock with that of the Standard & Poors
500 Stock Index and the NASDAQ Financial 100 index, for the period from March 23, 2007, the date
our common stock began trading, through February 28, 2009. The graph assumes that, on March 23,
2007, a person invested $100 in each of our common stock, the Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index and
the NASDAQ Financial 100 index. The graph measures total shareholder return, which takes into
account both changes in stock price and dividends. It assumes that dividends paid are reinvested in
like securities.
Sales of unregistered securities
We did not sell any securities during the period covered by this report that were not
registered under the Securities Act.
33
Issuer purchases of equity securities
In December 2008, as part of our dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders, we
purchased 126,855 shares of our common stock for $0.3 million in the open market in order to
satisfy the reinvestment portion of our dividends. The following chart outlines repurchases of our
common stock during the quarter ended February 28, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
(or Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Shares that May |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Announced |
|
Yet be Purchased |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Plans or |
|
Under the Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Program |
|
Programs |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share numbers) |
|
|
|
|
December 1, 2008
through December
31, 2008 |
|
|
127 |
(1) |
|
|
2.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan, we directed our plan administrator to purchase
the indicated quantity of shares in the open market in order to satisfy our obligations to
deliver shares of common stock to our stockholders with respect to our dividend for the third
quarter of fiscal year 2009. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
As of February 28, 2007, the Company (including its predecessors) had not yet commenced
operations. The following selected financial and other data for the years ended February 28, 2009
and February 29, 2008 are derived from our consolidated financial statements which have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm whose report thereon
is included within this Annual Report. The data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report, and
Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
GSC INVESTMENT CORP.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
For the Years Ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except share and per share numbers) |
|
Income Statement Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and related portfolio income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
21,142 |
|
|
$ |
20,744 |
|
Management fee and other income |
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and related portfolio income |
|
|
23,387 |
|
|
|
21,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and credit facility financing expenses |
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
Base management and incentive management fees(1) |
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
Administrator expenses |
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
Administrative and other |
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
2,766 |
|
Expense reimbursement |
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
(1,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
9,421 |
|
|
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income before income taxes |
|
|
13,966 |
|
|
|
10,836 |
|
Income tax expenses, including excise tax |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
13,826 |
|
|
|
10,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
|
(7,143 |
) |
|
|
3,908 |
|
Net change in unrealized loss |
|
|
(27,998 |
) |
|
|
(20,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loss |
|
|
(35,141 |
) |
|
|
(16,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
(21,315 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except share and per share numbers) |
|
Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share basic and diluted(2) |
|
$ |
(2.57 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
Net investment income per share basic and diluted(2) |
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) per share basic and diluted(2) |
|
$ |
(4.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.08 |
) |
Dividends declared per common share(3) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment assets at fair value |
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
|
$ |
172,837 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
130,662 |
|
|
|
192,842 |
|
Total debt outstanding |
|
|
58,995 |
|
|
|
78,450 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
68,014 |
|
|
|
97,869 |
|
Net asset value per common share |
|
$ |
8.20 |
|
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
Common shares outstanding at end of year |
|
|
8,291,384 |
|
|
|
8,291,384 |
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments funded |
|
|
28,260 |
|
|
|
314,003 |
|
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales |
|
|
49,195 |
|
|
|
141,772 |
|
Number of portfolio investments at year end |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Weighted average yield of income producing debt investments Non-control/non-affiliate |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
Weighted average yield on income producing debt investments Control |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
Quarterly Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Qtr 4 |
|
Qtr 3 |
|
Qtr 2 |
|
Qtr 1 |
|
Qtr 4 |
|
Qtr 3 |
|
Qtr 2 |
|
Qtr 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share numbers) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and related portfolio income |
|
$ |
5,480 |
|
|
$ |
6,361 |
|
|
$ |
5,835 |
|
|
$ |
5,715 |
|
|
$ |
5,520 |
|
|
$ |
5,882 |
|
|
$ |
5,882 |
|
|
$ |
4,102 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
3,288 |
|
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(17,296 |
) |
|
|
(11,438 |
) |
|
|
(6,023 |
) |
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
(11,972 |
) |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
(3,939 |
) |
|
|
1,722 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
resulting from operations |
|
|
(14,008 |
) |
|
|
(7,551 |
) |
|
|
(2,567 |
) |
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
(9,410 |
) |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
3,680 |
|
Net investment income per common share
at end of each quarter |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain
(loss) per common share at end of each
quarter |
|
$ |
(2.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.46 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Net asset value per common share |
|
$ |
8.20 |
|
|
$ |
10.14 |
|
|
$ |
11.05 |
|
|
$ |
11.75 |
|
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
|
$ |
13.51 |
|
|
$ |
13.76 |
|
|
$ |
14.21 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See note 6 in consolidated financial statements. |
|
(2) |
|
For the period ended February 29, 2008, amounts are calculated using weighted average common
shares outstanding for the year of 7,761,965. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on 8,291,384 common shares outstanding. |
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and
related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. In
addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this Annual Report
contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking information due to the factors
discussed under Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors and Note about Forward-Looking Statements
appearing elsewhere herein.
35
Overview
GSC Investment Corp. is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be treated as a BDC. Our
investment objectives are to generate current income and capital appreciation through debt and
equity investments by primarily investing in middle market companies and select high yield bonds.
We have elected and qualified to be treated as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code. We commenced
operations on March 23, 2007, and completed our IPO on March 28, 2007. We are externally managed
and advised by our investment adviser, GSCP (NJ), L.P.
We used the net proceeds of our IPO to purchase approximately $100.7 million in aggregate
principal amount of debt investments from CDO Fund III, a CLO fund managed by our investment
adviser. We used borrowings under our credit facilities to purchase approximately $115.1 million in
aggregate principal amount of debt investments in April and May 2007 from CDO Fund III and CDO Fund
I, a collateralized debt obligation fund managed by our investment adviser. As of February 28,
2009, our portfolio consisted of $118.9 million, principally invested in 35 portfolio companies and
one CLO.
Revenues
We generate revenue in the form of interest income and capital gains on the debt investments
that we hold and capital gains, if any, on equity interests that we may acquire. We expect our debt
investments, whether in the form of first and second lien term loans, mezzanine debt or high yield
bonds, to have terms of up to ten years, and to bear interest at either a fixed or floating rate.
Interest on debt will be payable generally either quarterly or semi-annually. In some cases our
debt investments may provide for a portion of the interest to be paid-in-kind (PIK). To the
extent interest is paid-in-kind, it will be payable through the increase of the principal amount of
the obligation by the amount of interest due on the then-outstanding aggregate principal amount of
such obligation. The principal amount of the debt and any accrued but unpaid interest will
generally become due at the maturity date. In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of
commitment, origination, structuring or diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance or
investment management services and possibly consulting fees. Any such fees will be generated in
connection with our investments and recognized as earned. We may also invest in preferred equity
securities that pay dividends on a current basis.
Pursuant to an agreement with our investment adviser entered into on October 17, 2006, prior
to becoming a BDC, we acquired the right to act as investment adviser to CDO Fund III and collect
the management fees related thereto from March 20, 2007 until the liquidation of the CDO Fund III
assets. We paid our investment adviser a fair market price of $0.1 million for the right to act as
investment adviser to CDO Fund III.
On January 22, 2008 we entered into a collateral management agreement with GSCIC CLO pursuant
to which we will act as its collateral manager and receive a senior collateral management fee of
0.10% and a subordinate collateral management fee of 0.40% of the outstanding principal amount of
GSCIC CLOs assets, paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an
incentive management fee equal to 20% of excess cash flow to the extent the GSCIC CLO subordinated
notes receive an internal rate of return equal to or greater than 12%.
We recognize interest income on our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO using
the effective interest method, based on the anticipated yield and the estimated cash flows over the
projected life of the investment. Yields are revised when there are changes in actual or estimated
cash flows due to changes in prepayments and/or re-investments, credit losses or asset pricing.
Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an adjustment to the estimated yield over the
remaining life of the investment from the date the estimated yield was changed.
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses include the payment of investment advisory and management fees,
professional fees, directors and officers insurance, fees paid to independent directors and
administrator expenses, including our allocable portion of our administrators overhead. Our
allocable portion is based on the ratio of our total assets to the total assets administered by our
administrator. Our investment advisory and management fees compensate our investment adviser for
its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing and monitoring our investments. We bear
all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including those relating to:
36
|
|
|
calculating our net asset value (including the cost and expenses of any
independent valuation firm); |
|
|
|
|
expenses incurred by our investment adviser payable to third parties, including
agents, consultants or other advisers, in monitoring our financial and legal affairs and
in monitoring our investments and performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio
companies; |
|
|
|
|
interest payable on debt, if any, incurred to finance our investments; |
|
|
|
|
offerings of our common stock and other securities; |
|
|
|
|
investment advisory and management fees; |
|
|
|
|
administration fees; |
|
|
|
|
fees payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or other advisers,
relating to, or associated with, evaluating and making investments; |
|
|
|
|
transfer agent and custodial fees; |
|
|
|
|
registration fees; |
|
|
|
|
listing fees; |
|
|
|
|
taxes; |
|
|
|
|
independent directors fees and expenses; |
|
|
|
|
costs of preparing and filing reports or other documents of the SEC; |
|
|
|
|
the costs of any reports; |
|
|
|
|
proxy statements or other notices to stockholders, including printing costs; |
|
|
|
|
to the extent we are covered by any joint insurance policies, our allocable
portion of the insurance premiums for such joint policies; |
|
|
|
|
direct costs and expenses of administration, including auditor and legal
costs; and |
|
|
|
|
all other expenses incurred by us or our administrator in connection with
administering our business. |
The amount payable to GSC Group as administrator under the administration agreement is capped
to the effect that such amount, together with our other operating expenses, does not exceed an
amount equal to 1.5% per annum of our net assets attributable to common stock. In addition, for the
current one-year term of the administration agreement (expiring March 21, 2010), GSC Group has
waived our reimbursement obligation under the administration agreement until our total assets
exceed $500 million.
Pursuant to the investment advisory and management agreement, we pay GSC Group as investment
adviser a quarterly base management fee of 1.75% of the average value of our total assets (other
than cash or cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) at the end of the
two most recently completed fiscal quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the applicable fiscal quarter, and an incentive fee.
The incentive fee has two parts:
|
|
|
A fee, payable quarterly in arrears, equal to 20% of our pre-incentive fee net
investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the net assets at the
end of the immediately preceding quarter, that exceeds a 1.875% quarterly (7.5%
annualized) hurdle rate measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. Under this
provision, in any fiscal quarter, our investment adviser receives no incentive fee
unless our pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds the hurdle rate of |
37
|
|
|
1.875%. Amounts received as a return of capital are not included in calculating this portion
of the incentive fee. Since the hurdle rate is based on net assets, a return of less than
the hurdle rate on total assets may still result in an incentive fee. |
|
|
|
|
A fee, payable at the end of each fiscal year, equal to 20% of our net realized
capital gains, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized
capital depreciation, in each case on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of
capital gains incentive fees paid to the investment adviser through such date. |
We will defer cash payment of any incentive fee otherwise earned by our investment adviser if,
during the most recent four full fiscal quarter period ending on or prior to the date such payment
is to be made, the sum of (a) our aggregate distributions to our stockholders and (b) our change in
net assets (defined as total assets less liabilities) (before taking into account any incentive
fees payable during that period) is less than 7.5% of our net assets at the beginning of such
period. These calculations will be appropriately pro rated for the first three fiscal quarters of
operation and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the applicable period. Such
incentive fee will become payable on the next date on which such test has been satisfied for the
most recent four full fiscal quarters or upon certain terminations of the investment advisory and
management agreement. We commenced deferring cash payment of incentive fees during the quarterly
period ended August 31, 2007, and have continued to defer such payments through the current
quarterly period; we have recorded a payable in respect of such deferred fees in the amount of $2.3
million as of February 28, 2009.
To the extent that any of our leveraged loans are denominated in a currency other than
U.S. dollars, we may enter into currency hedging contracts to reduce our exposure to fluctuations
in currency exchange rates. We may also enter into interest rate hedging agreements. Such hedging
activities, which will be subject to compliance with applicable legal requirements, may include the
use of interest rate caps, futures, options and forward contracts. Costs incurred in entering into
or settling such contracts will be borne by us.
From the commencement of operations until March 23, 2008, GSC Group reimbursed us for
operating expenses to the extent that our total annual operating expenses (other than investment
advisory and management fees and interest and credit facility expenses) exceeded an amount equal to
1.55% of our net assets attributable to common stock.
Portfolio and investment activity
Corporate Debt Portfolio Overview(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At February 28, 2009 |
|
At February 29, 2008 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Number of investments |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Number of portfolio companies |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Average investment size |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
Weighted average maturity |
|
|
3.3 |
years |
|
|
3.8 |
years |
Number of industries |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Average investment per portfolio company |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
Non-Performing or delinquent investments |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fixed rate debt (% of interest bearing portfolio) |
|
$ |
40.3 (41.8 |
%) |
|
$ |
57.0 (39.6 |
%) |
Weighted average current coupon |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Floating rate debt (% of interest bearing portfolio) |
|
$ |
56.2 (58.2 |
%) |
|
$ |
86.8 (60.4 |
%) |
Weighted average current spread over LIBOR |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO and GSC Partners CDO
GP III, LP. |
During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, we made 17 investments in an aggregate amount
of $23.1 million in new portfolio companies and $5.2 million in investments in existing portfolio
companies. Also during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, we had $49.2 million in aggregate
amount of exits and repayments resulting in net repayments of $20.9 million for the year.
During the fiscal year ended
February 29, 2008, we made 144 investments in an aggregate amount of $314.0 million. Also during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, we had $141.8 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments, resulting in net investments of $172.2 million in aggregate amount for the year.
38
Our portfolio composition at February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008 was as follows:
Portfolio composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At February 28, 2009 |
|
At February 29, 2008 |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Weighted Average |
|
Percentage of |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
Current Yield |
|
Total Portfolio |
|
Current Yield |
First lien term loans |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Second lien term loans |
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Senior secured notes |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Unsecured notes |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
GSCIC CLO subordinated notes |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Equity/limited partnership interests |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO represents a first loss position in a
portfolio that, at February 28, 2009, was composed of $416.0 million in aggregate principal amount
of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. This investment is subject to unique risks.
(See Part I, Item 1A Risk FactorsRisks related to our investmentsOur investment in GSCIC CLO
constitutes a leveraged investment in a portfolio of predominantly senior secured first lien term
loans and is subject to additional risks and volatility) and we do not consolidate the GSCIC CLO
portfolio on our financial statements. Accordingly, the metrics below do not include the underlying
GSCIC CLO portfolio investments. However, at February 28, 2009, two GSCIC CLO portfolio investments
were in default and over 75.7% of the GSCIC CLO portfolio investments had a CMR (as defined below)
numerical debt score of less than 2.99 and a corporate letter rating of A or B.
GSC Group normally grades all of our investments using an internally developed credit and
monitoring rating system (CMR). The CMR rating consists of two components: (i) a numerical debt
score and (ii) a corporate letter rating. The numerical debt score is based on the objective
evaluation of six risk categories: (i) leverage, (ii) seniority in the capital structure,
(iii) fixed charge coverage ratio, (iv) debt service coverage/liquidity, (v) operating performance,
and (vi) business/industry risk. The numerical debt score ranges from 1.00 to 5.00, which can
generally be characterized as follows:
|
|
|
1.00-2.00 represents investments that hold senior positions in the capital
structure and, typically, have low financial leverage and/or strong historical operating
performance; |
|
|
|
|
2.00-3.00 represents investments that hold relatively senior positions in the
capital structure, either senior secured, senior unsecured, or senior subordinate, and
have moderate financial leverage and/or are performing at or above expectations; |
|
|
|
|
3.00-4.00 represents investments that are junior in the capital structure, have
moderate financial leverage and/or are performing at or below expectations; and |
|
|
|
|
4.00-5.00 represents investments that are highly leveraged and/or have poor
operating performance. |
The numerical debt score is designed to produce higher scores for debt positions that are more
subordinate in the capital structure. Therefore, second lien term loans, high-yield bonds and
mezzanine debt will generally be assigned scores of 2.25 or higher.
The CMR also consists of a corporate letter rating whereby each credit is assigned a letter
rating based on several subjective criteria, including perceived financial and operating strength
and covenant compliance. The corporate letter ratings range from (A) through (F) and are
characterized as follows: (A) equals strong credit, (B) equals satisfactory credit, (C) equals
special attention credit, (D) equals payment default risk, (E) equals payment default, (F) equals
restructured equity security.
39
The CMR distribution of our investments at February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008 was as
follows:
Portfolio CMR distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At February 28, 2009 |
|
|
At February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Numerical Debt Score |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
1.00 - 1.99 |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
$ |
11,863 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
2.00 - 2.99 |
|
|
33,831 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
87,423 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
|
3.00 - 3.99 |
|
|
49,076 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
44,459 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
4.00 - 4.99 |
|
|
4,614 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A(1) |
|
|
22,450 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
29,092 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
172,837 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At February 28, 2009 |
|
|
At February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Corporate Letter Rating |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
A |
|
$ |
4,602 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
B |
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
112,019 |
|
|
|
64.8 |
|
C |
|
|
42,700 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
31,726 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
D |
|
|
11,668 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A(1) |
|
|
22,450 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
29,092 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
172,837 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Predominantly comprised of our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO. |
At February 28, 2009, 36.0% of our investments had a CMR debt score of 2.99 or below, a
decline of 21.5% from February 29, 2008. The decline is mainly due to deterioration in leverage
ratios and interest coverage ratios in our investments as of their latest quarterly financials and,
in some cases, a decline in EBITDA as compared to a prior period. Additionally, at February 28,
2009, 41.3% of our investments were assigned a CMR letter rating of A or B, a decline of 23.5% from
February 29, 2008. The migration of our investments from primarily B/C to primarily B/C/D is mainly
attributable to deterioration in credit metrics as compared to the covenant tests in the applicable
credit agreement or indenture.
The following table shows the portfolio composition by industry grouping at fair value at
February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008.
Portfolio composition by industry grouping at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At February 28, 2009 |
|
|
At February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Structured Finance Securities(1) |
|
$ |
22,341 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
$ |
28,915 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
% |
Manufacturing |
|
|
14,480 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
15,030 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Packaging |
|
|
10,070 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
16,370 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Consumer Products |
|
|
7,843 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
10,021 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Oil and Gas |
|
|
7,359 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
7,738 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Electronics |
|
|
6,849 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Apparel |
|
|
6,616 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Publishing |
|
|
6,477 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
9,289 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Healthcare Services |
|
|
6,010 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
6,040 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Metals |
|
|
5,693 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
5,129 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Natural Resources |
|
|
4,470 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Environmental |
|
|
3,592 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
5,066 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Homebuilding |
|
|
3,490 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At February 28, 2009 |
|
|
At February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
Financial Services |
|
$ |
3,162 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
$ |
3,815 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Logistics |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Food and Beverage |
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printing |
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Building Products |
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Software |
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Chemicals |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Services |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Agriculture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,158 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Gaming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Restaurants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
172,837 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comprised of our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO. |
The following table shows the portfolio composition by geographic location at fair value at
February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008. The geographic composition is determined by the location
of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company.
Portfolio composition by geographic location at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At February 28, 2009 |
|
|
At February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Midwest |
|
$ |
31,716 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
$ |
40,109 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
% |
Southeast |
|
|
23,094 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
33,685 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
22,449 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
29,092 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
West |
|
|
16,137 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
24,450 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
12,578 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
11,395 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
International |
|
|
12,165 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
13,739 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
20,367 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
172,837 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Predominantly comprised of our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO. |
Results of operations
Investment income
Total investment income was $23.4 million for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 versus
$21.4 million for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, an increase of $2.0 million, or 9.3%.
The increase is predominantly attributable to the management fee earned from GSCIC CLO during the
fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 and the Companys being operational for only eleven months
during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008.
41
The composition of our investment income in each period was as follows:
Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended |
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Interest from investments |
|
$ |
20,967 |
|
|
$ |
20,378 |
|
Management of GSCIC CLO |
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
Interest from cash and cash equivalents and other income |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
23,387 |
|
|
$ |
21,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, total PIK income was $0.8 million. For the fiscal
year ended February 29, 2008, total PIK income was $0.4 million.
Operating expenses
Total operating expenses before manager reimbursement were $10.4 million for the fiscal year
ended February 28, 2009 versus $12.3 million for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, a
decrease of $1.9 million, or 15.4%. The composition of our operating expenses in each period was as
follows:
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended |
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Interest and credit facility expense |
|
$ |
2,605 |
|
|
$ |
5,031 |
|
Base management fees |
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
Incentive management fees |
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
Administrator expenses |
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
Insurance expenses |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Directors fees |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,431 |
|
|
$ |
12,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest and credit facility expense for the fiscal year ended February 28,
2009 versus the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 was due to decreased borrowing under the
Revolving Facility (please see Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources below for
more information). The increase in incentive management fee for the fiscal year ended February 28,
2009 versus the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 resulted from the combination of higher net
investment income and lower operating expenses between the two periods, and was partially offset by
a decrease in base management fees resulting from a decrease in the average value of our total net
assets, and decreased professional fees.
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, we recorded $1.0 million in expense waiver and
reimbursement from the administrator and Manager versus $1.8 million for the fiscal year ended
February 29, 2008. The decline was due to the termination of the expense reimbursement agreement as
of March 23, 2008, pursuant to which GSC Group had reimbursed the Company for operating expenses
(other than investment advisory and management fees and interest and credit facility expenses) in
excess of 1.55% of net assets attributable to common stock.
42
Net realized gains/losses on sales of investments
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, the Company had $7.2 million of net realized
losses versus $3.9 million of net realized gains for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008. The
most significant realized gains and losses for each period were the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized |
Issuer |
|
Asset Type |
|
Gross Proceeds |
|
Cost |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Key Safety Systems |
|
First Lien Term Loan |
|
$ |
2,063 |
|
|
$ |
1,857 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
SILLC Holdings, LLC |
|
Second Lien Term Loan |
|
|
23,049 |
|
|
|
22,878 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
EuroFresh, Inc. |
|
Unsecured Notes |
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
(4,020 |
) |
Atlantis Plastics Films, Inc. |
|
First Lien Term Loan |
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
|
6,053 |
|
|
|
(2,980 |
) |
Claires Stores, Inc. |
|
First Lien Term Loan |
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
(481 |
) |
Jason Incorporated |
|
Unsecured Notes |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
The most significant losses for the period are attributable to the bankruptcy of Atlantis
Plastics Films, Inc. and the sale of EuroFresh Inc. Due to deteriorating performance and increased
leverage, we liquidated our investment in EuroFresh, Inc. during our third quarter. Atlantis
Plastics Films, Inc. filed for bankruptcy during our second quarter and was auctioned in two
separate asset sales transactions during our third quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized |
Issuer |
|
Asset Type |
|
Gross Proceeds |
|
Cost |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Sportcraft, LTD |
|
Second Lien Term Loan |
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,302 |
|
|
$ |
1,698 |
|
SILLC Holdings, LLC |
|
Senior Secured Notes |
|
|
22,821 |
|
|
|
21,838 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
McMillin Companies, LLC |
|
Senior Secured Notes |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
The most significant gains for the period are attributable to the repayment at par of the
Sportcraft, Ltd. second lien term loan and the McMillin Companies, LLC senior secured notes and the
exchange of SILLC Holdings, LLC senior secured notes for a second lien term loan.
Net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, the Companys investments had an increase in net
unrealized depreciation of $28.0 million versus an increase in net unrealized depreciation of $20.1
million for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008. The most significant cumulative changes in
unrealized depreciation for each period were the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Unrealized |
|
YTD Change in |
Issuer |
|
Asset Type |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Depreciation |
|
Unrealized Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
GSCIC CLO |
|
Other/Structured Finance Securities |
|
$ |
29,905 |
|
|
$ |
22,341 |
|
|
$ |
(7,564 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,480 |
) |
Jason Incorporated |
|
Unsecured Notes |
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
(3,822 |
) |
|
|
(3,453 |
) |
Grant U.S. Holdings LLP |
|
Second Lien Term Loan |
|
|
6,140 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
(3,752 |
) |
|
|
(2,553 |
) |
McMillin Companies, LLC |
|
Unsecured Notes |
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
3,490 |
|
|
|
(3,805 |
) |
|
|
(2,522 |
) |
Penton Media, Inc. |
|
First Lien Term Loan |
|
|
3,724 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
(1,716 |
) |
|
|
(1,906 |
) |
Network Communications |
|
Unsecured Notes |
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
2,503 |
|
|
|
(2,579 |
) |
|
|
(1,884 |
) |
Terphane Holdings Corp. |
|
Senior Secured Notes |
|
|
10,431 |
|
|
|
7,694 |
|
|
|
(2,737 |
) |
|
|
(1,863 |
) |
The $6.5 million net unrealized depreciation in our investment in the GSCIC CLO subordinated
notes was due to an increase in the assumed portfolio default rate and present value discount rate
in our discounted cash flow model. These changes were made to reflect the current market
environment for CLO equity investments and not as a result of any change in the underlying GSCIC
CLO portfolio. The reasons for changes in the fair value of other portfolio investments must be
considered on a case-by-case basis. However, two factors that we believe have had a significant
impact on our portfolio overall are the market wide increase in interest yield as a result of risk
re-pricing and the profusion of forced liquidations as loan buyers are forced to raise capital. For
example, from the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009,
the Credit Suisse High Yield Index increased from an average
43
yield of 10.33% to 17.85% and the Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index decreased from an average price of 88.33% to 65.13%. While we
believe that these indices effectively illustrate the adverse general market conditions, we believe
that market-wide movements are not necessarily indicative of any changes in the condition or prospects of the affected
portfolio investments. Nonetheless, our valuation process requires us to take into account such
conditions in determining the fair value of our portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Unrealized |
|
YTD Change in |
Issuer |
|
Asset Type |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Depreciation |
|
Unrealized Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Eurofresh, Inc. |
|
Unsecured Notes |
|
$ |
6,891 |
|
|
$ |
3,850 |
|
|
$ |
(3,041 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,041 |
) |
SILLC Holdings, LLC |
|
Second Lien Term Loan |
|
|
22,865 |
|
|
|
20,283 |
|
|
|
(2,582 |
) |
|
|
(2,582 |
) |
Atlantis Plastics Films, Inc. |
|
First Lien Term Loan |
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
|
4,298 |
|
|
|
(2,194 |
) |
|
|
(2,194 |
) |
Bankruptcy Management |
|
Second Lien Term Loan |
|
|
4,902 |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
(1,347 |
) |
|
|
(1,347 |
) |
McMillin Companies LLC |
|
Unsecured Notes |
|
|
7,195 |
|
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
(1,283 |
) |
|
|
(1,283 |
) |
Grant U.S. Holdings LLP |
|
Second Lien Term Loan |
|
|
5,365 |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
The net unrealized depreciation in Eurofresh, Inc. unsecured notes and Atlantis Plastics
Films, Inc. second lien term loan were converted into realized losses upon their sale in the fiscal
year ended February 28, 2009. The net unrealized depreciation in SILLC Holdings, LLC second lien
term loan was reversed when the loan was repaid at par in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.
Net realized gains/losses on derivatives
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, the Company recorded a net realized gain on
derivatives of $30,454 relating to our investment in the GSCIC CLO warehouse facility. For the
fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, the Company recorded a net realized gain on derivatives of
$0.7 million from the same warehouse facility (see Off-balance sheet arrangements below).
Net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on derivatives
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, changes in the value of the interest rate caps
purchased pursuant to the credit facilities resulted in an unrealized depreciation of $37,221
versus an unrealized depreciation of $54,266 for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008.
Changes in net asset value from operations
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, we recorded a net decrease in net assets
resulting from operations of $21.3 million versus a net decrease in net assets resulting from
operations of $5.5 million for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008. The difference is
attributable to the $7.9 million increase in net unrealized depreciation on investments, the
decrease of $0.7 million in net realized gains on derivatives and the increase in net realized
losses on investments of $10.3 million from the earlier to the latter period, which offset the $2.0
million gain in investment income and reduction of $1.9 million in operating expenses before
manager expense waiver and reimbursement. Based on 8,291,384 weighted average common shares
outstanding as of February 28, 2009, our per share net decrease in net assets resulting from
operations was $2.57 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 versus a per share net decrease in
net assets resulting from operations of $0.70 for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 (based on
7,761,965 weighted average common shares outstanding for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008).
Financial condition, liquidity and capital resources
The Companys liquidity and capital resources have been generated primarily from the net
proceeds of its IPO, advances from the Revolving Facility and the Term Facility, as well as cash
flows from operations. On March 28, 2007, we completed our IPO and issued 7,250,000 common shares
and received net proceeds of $100.7 million.
On April 11, 2007, we entered into a $100.0 million revolving securitized credit facility (the
Revolving Facility). On May 1, 2007, we entered into a $25.7 million term securitized credit
facility (the Term Facility and, together with the Revolving Facility, the Facilities), which
was fully drawn at closing. In December 2007, we consolidated the Facilities by using a draw under
the Revolving Facility to repay the Term Facility. In response to the market wide decline in
financial asset prices, which has negatively affect the value of our portfolio, we terminated the
revolving period of the Revolving Facility effective January 14, 2009 and commenced a two-year
amortization period during which all principal proceeds from the collateral will be used to repay
outstanding borrowings. At the end of the two year amortization period, all advances will be due
and payable. In March 2009 we amended the
44
Revolving Credit Facility to decrease the minimum
required collateralization and increase the portion of the portfolio that can be invested in CCC
rated investments in return for an increased interest rate and expedited amortization. As a result
of these transactions, we expect to have additional cushion under our Borrowing Base (as defined
below). If we are not able to obtain new sources of financing, however, we expect our portfolio
will gradually de-lever as principal payments are received, which may negatively impact our net
investment income and ability to pay dividends. Please see Part I, Item 1A Risk FactorsRisks
Related to Our BusinessWe need to find alternative sources of leverage and/or access the equity
markets to maintain and grow our business for more information.
As of February 28, 2009, we had borrowed an aggregate of $59.0 million under the Revolving
Facility. Interest is payable on funds drawn under the Revolving Facility at the prevailing
commercial paper rates or, if the commercial paper market is at any time unavailable, the
prevailing LIBOR rates, plus 0.70%, payable monthly. The interest margin will increase from and
after the March 2009 amendment to 4.00% until March 2010 (6.00% if the commercial paper market is
unavailable) and 5.00% thereafter (6.00% if the commercial paper market is unavailable).
A significant percentage of our total investments have been pledged to secure our obligations
under the Revolving Facility.
The actual amount that may be outstanding on the Revolving Facility at any given time (the
Borrowing Base) is dependent upon the amount and quality of the collateral securing the Revolving
Facility. Our Borrowing Base was $59.9 million at February 28, 2009 versus $83.6 million at
February 29, 2008. The decline in our Borrowing Base during this period is mainly attributable to
the decline in the value of the pledged collateral and the downgrade of certain public ratings or
private credit estimates of the pledged collateral. Pro forma for the March 2009 amendment, our
Borrowing Base at February 28, 2009 would have been $72.4 million as a result of the decrease in
minimum required collateralization and increase in the permissible amount of CCC rated
investments in the collateral.
For purposes of determining the Borrowing Base, most assets are assigned the values set forth
in our most recent quarterly report filed with the SEC. Accordingly, the February 28, 2009
Borrowing Base relies upon the valuations set forth in the quarterly report for the quarter ended
November 30, 2008. The valuations presented in this Annual Report will not be incorporated into the
Borrowing Base until after this report is filed with the SEC. Pro forma for the March 2009
amendment and using the February 28, 2009 values, the collateral balance at February 28, 2009 would
have been $62.0 million. At February 28, 2009, the Company had $6.4 million of unrestricted cash
and cash equivalents that could be pledged under the Revolving Facility to increase the Borrowing
Base or to repay outstanding borrowings.
A Borrowing Base violation will occur if our outstanding borrowings exceed the Borrowing Base
at any time. We can cure a Borrowing Base violation by reducing our borrowing below the Borrowing
Base (by, e.g., selling collateral and repaying borrowings) or pledging additional collateral to
increase the Borrowing Base. If we fail to cure a Borrowing Base violation within the specified
time, a default under the Revolving Facility shall occur. Please see Part I, Item 1A. Risk
FactorsRisks Related to Current Economic and Market ConditionsRatings downgrades in our portfolio
could require us to liquidate assets or face a default under the Revolving Facility for more
information.
Following the end of the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, AbitibiBowater Inc. and certain
of its subsidiaries, which includes Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada (Abitibi), filed
voluntary petitions on April 16, 2009 in the United States under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code and sought creditor protection under the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act in
Canada. At April 30, 2009, after giving effect to this filing, our pro forma Borrowing Base (pro
forma for our February 28, 2009 asset values) was $57.4 million, our outstanding borrowings were
$57.8 million and our pro forma unrestricted cash and cash equivalents (pro forma for payments
under our Revolving Facility as of April 30, which were received in May) was $9.9 million. Two
other portfolio investments have experienced adverse events that, if not cured, will result in
additional decreases in our Borrowing Base of $1.3 million at the end of May and $7.8 million at
the end of June. Further decreases in our Borrowing Base could result in a Borrowing Base
violation that we may not be able to cure with our remaining unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents.
In April 2009, our investment adviser withheld a scheduled principal amortization payment
under its credit facility, resulting in a default thereunder. Our investment adviser has initiated
discussions with its secured lenders regarding a consensual restructuring of its obligations under
such credit facility. While we are not directly affected by our investment advisers default, a
material adverse change in the business, condition (financial or otherwise), operations or
performance of our investment adviser could constitute a default under our Revolving Facility.
Our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act, was 215% at February 28, 2009 versus
225% at February 29, 2008.
45
At February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008, the fair value of investments, cash and cash
equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At February 28, 2009 |
|
|
At February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6,356 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts |
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
14,581 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
First lien term loans |
|
|
17,118 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
26,362 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
Second lien term loans |
|
|
41,043 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
62,446 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
Senior secured notes |
|
|
25,832 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
31,657 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
Unsecured notes |
|
|
12,381 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
23,280 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Other/structured finance securities |
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
28,915 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Equity/limited partnership interests |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
126,447 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
188,490 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A dividend of $0.25 per share was paid on December 29, 2008, to common stockholders of record
on December 18, 2008. In order to better manage the Companys capital in light of continuing
volatility in the credit markets, the Board determined that, beginning with the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2009, it would determine the amount and timing of dividends, if any, upon review of the
financial results of the quarter. Accordingly, the Board will consider payment of a dividend for
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 at its regularly scheduled May 2009 meeting. The timing and
amount of dividends remains within the Boards discretion. Subject to certain conditions, for
taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2009, we are permitted to make distributions to our
stockholders in the form of shares of our common stock in lieu of cash distributions. The decision
to make such distributions will be made by our Board of Directors.
Contractual obligations
The following table shows our payment obligations for repayment of debt and other contractual
obligations at February 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 1 |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
More Than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
|
$ |
58,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet arrangements
At February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements
that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition,
changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
Recent Developments
In March 2009 we amended the Revolving Credit Facility to decrease the minimum required
collateralization and increase the portion of the portfolio that can be invested in CCC rated
investments in return for an increased interest rate and expedited amortization. As a result of
these transactions, we expect to have additional cushion under our Borrowing Base. If we are not
able to obtain new sources of financing, however, we expect our portfolio will gradually de-lever
as principal payments are received, which may negatively impact our net investment income and
ability to pay dividends. Please see Part I, Item 1A Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessWe
need to find alternative sources of leverage and/or access the equity markets to maintain and grow
our business for more information. As a result of the amendment, the interest margin on the
Revolving Facility will increase from 0.70% over the prevailing commercial paper rate (Or LIBOR, if
the commercial paper market is unavailable) to 4.00% until March 2010 (6.00% if the commercial
paper market is unavailable) and 5.00% thereafter (6.00% if the commercial paper market is
unavailable).
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our business activities contain elements of market risk. We consider our principal market
risks to be fluctuations in interest rates and the inherent difficulty of determining the fair
value of our investments that do not have a readily available market value.
46
Managing these risks is essential to our business. Accordingly, we have systems and procedures designed to identify and
analyze our risks, to establish appropriate policies and thresholds and to continually monitor these risks
and thresholds by means of administrative and information technology systems and other policies and
processes.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is defined as the sensitivity of our current and future earnings to
interest rate volatility, including relative changes in different interest rates, variability of
spread relationships, the difference in re-pricing intervals between our assets and liabilities and
the effect that interest rates may have on our cash flows. Changes in the general level of interest
rates can affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income
earned on interest earning assets and our interest expense incurred in connection with our interest
bearing debt and liabilities. Changes in interest rates can also affect, among other things, our
ability to acquire leveraged loans, high yield bonds and other debt investments and the value of
our investment portfolio.
Our investment income is affected by fluctuations in various interest rates, including LIBOR
and the prime rate. A large portion of our portfolio is, and we expect will continue to be,
comprised of floating rate investments that utilize LIBOR. Our interest expense is affected by
fluctuations in the commercial paper rate or, if the commercial paper market is unavailable, LIBOR.
At February 28, 2009, we had $59.0 million of borrowings outstanding at a floating rate tied to the
prevailing commercial paper rate plus a margin of 0.70%.
In April and May 2007, pursuant to the Revolving Facility, the Company entered into two
interest rate cap agreements with notional amounts of $34.0 million (increased to $40.0 million in
May 2007) and $60.9 million. These agreements provide for a payment to the Company in the event
LIBOR exceeds 8%, mitigating our exposure to increases in LIBOR. At February 28, 2009, the
aggregate interest rate cap agreement notional amount was $66.4 million.
We have analyzed the potential impact of changes in interest rates on interest income from
investments net of interest expense on the Revolving Facility. Assuming that our investments as of
February 28, 2009 were to remain constant for a full fiscal year and no actions were taken to alter
the existing interest rate terms, a hypothetical change of 1% in interest rates would cause a
corresponding change of approximately $0.2 million to our interest income net of interest expense.
Although management believes that this measure is indicative of our sensitivity to interest
rate changes, it does not adjust for potential changes in credit quality, size and composition of
the assets on the balance sheet and other business developments that could magnify or diminish our
sensitivity to interest rate changes, nor does it account for divergences in LIBOR and the
commercial paper rate, which have historically moved in tandem but, in times of unusual credit
dislocations, have experienced periods of divergence. Accordingly no assurances can be given that
actual results would not materially differ from the potential outcome simulated by this estimate.
Portfolio Valuation
We carry our investments at fair value, as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are fair valued at such market
quotations. We value investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair
value as determined in good faith by our Board under our valuation policy and a consistently
applied valuation process. For investments that are thinly traded, we review the depth and quality
of the available quotations to determine if market quotations are readily available. If the
available quotations are indicative only, we may determine that market quotations are not readily
available. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not
have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments, and the
differences could be material. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that
may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on
these investments to be different than the valuations that are assigned.
The types of factors that we may take into account in fair value pricing of our investments
include, as relevant, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, third party valuations,
the portfolio companys ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the
portfolio company does business, market yield trend analysis, comparison to publicly-traded
securities, recent sales of or offers to buy comparable companies, and other relevant factors. The
fair value of our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO is based on a discounted cash
flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical
experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash
flow, and comparable yields for similar CLO subordinated notes or equity, when available.
47
The table below describes the primary considerations made by our Board of Directors in
determining the fair value of our investments at February 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Market yield trend analysis and enterprise valuation |
|
$ |
53,629 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
% |
Third party independent valuation firm |
|
|
36,048 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
Discounted cash flow model |
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Readily available market maker, broker quotes |
|
|
6,786 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair valued investments |
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our financial statements are annexed to this Annual Report beginning on page F-1.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Our CEO and our CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded
that our current disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period
covered by this report.
Managements annual report on internal control over financial reporting
The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) and for the
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision
and with the participation of management, including the CEO and CFO, the Company conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on
the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the Companys evaluation under
the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, the Companys management concluded that the
Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 28, 2009.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Companys registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by Companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only managements
report in this Annual Report.
Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during our most recently completed
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
48
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement for its 2009 Annual Stockholder Meeting and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement for its 2009 Annual Stockholder Meeting and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement for its 2009 Annual Stockholder Meeting and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement for its 2009 Annual Stockholder Meeting and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement for its 2009 Annual Stockholder Meeting and is incorporated herein by reference.
49
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
Consolidated Financial Statements
The following financial statements of the Company are filed herewith:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008
and for the period from May 12, 2006 (date of inception) to February 28, 2007
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended February 28, 2009 and
February 29, 2008 and for the period from May 12, 2006 (date of inception) to February 28, 2007
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008
and for the period from May 12, 2006 (date of inception) to February 28, 2007
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
50
Exhibits
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of GSC Investment Corp.(8) |
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of GSC Investment Corp.(9) |
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen certificate of GSC Investment Corp.s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.(4) |
|
4.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated March 27, 2007 between GSC Investment Corp., GSC CDO III L.L.C., GSCP
(NJ) L.P. and the other investors party thereto.(8) |
|
4.3
|
|
Form of Dividend Reinvestment Plan.(1) |
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of GSC Partners CDO Investors III, L.P. dated August 27,
2001.(2) |
|
10.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of GSC Partners CDO GP III, L.P. dated October 16, 2001.(2) |
|
10.3
|
|
Collateral Management Agreement dated November 5, 2001 among GSC Partners CDO Fund III, Limited and GSCP
(NJ), L.P.(2) |
|
10.4
|
|
Contribution and Exchange Agreement dated October 17, 2006 among GSC Investment LLC, GSC CDO III, L.L.C.,
GSCP (NJ), L.P., and the other investors party thereto.(1) |
|
10.5
|
|
Amendment to the Contribution and Exchange Agreement dated as of March 20, 2007 among GSC Investment LLC, GSC
CDO III, L.L.C., GSCP (NJ), L.P., and the other investors party
thereto.(11) |
|
10.6
|
|
Form of Regulations of American Stock Transfer and Trust Company.(3) |
|
10.7
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Peter K. Barker, as director of
GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.8
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Robert F. Cummings, Jr., as
director of GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.9
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Richard M. Hayden, as director
of GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.10
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Thomas V. Inglesby, as director
of GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.11
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Steven M. Looney, as director
of GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.12
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Charles S. Whitman III, as
director of GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.13
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and G. Cabell Williams, as director
of GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.14
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Richard T. Allorto, Jr., as
Chief Financial Officer of GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.15
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and David L. Goret, as Vice
President and Secretary of GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.16
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Michael J. Monticciolo, as
Chief Compliance Officer of GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.17
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Daniel I. Castro, Jr., as
member of the investment committee of GSCP (NJ), LP.(8) |
|
10.18
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Robert F. Cummings, Jr., as
member of the investment committee of GSCP (NJ), LP.(8) |
|
10.19
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Richard M. Hayden, as member of
the investment committee of GSCP (NJ), LP.(8) |
|
10.20
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Thomas V. Inglesby, as member
of the investment committee of GSCP (NJ), LP.(8) |
|
10.21
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and Thomas J. Libassi, as member of
the investment committee of GSCP (NJ), LP.(8) |
|
10.22
|
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated March 20, 2007 among GSCP (NJ), L.P. and GSC Investment LLC.(8) |
|
10.23
|
|
Investment Advisory and Management Agreement dated March 21, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and GSCP (NJ)
L.P.(8) |
51
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.24
|
|
Custodian Agreement dated March 21, 2007 between GSC Investment LLC and U.S. Bank National Association.(8) |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Administration Agreement dated March 21, 2007 between GSC Investment Corp. and GSCP (NJ) L.P.(8) |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Trademark License Agreement dated March 21, 2007 between GSC Investment Corp. and GSCP (NJ) L.P.(8) |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Notification of Fee Reimbursement dated March 21, 2007.(8) |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Portfolio Acquisition Agreement dated March 23, 2007 between GSC Investment Corp. and GSC Partners CDO
Fund III, Limited.(8) |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of April 11, 2007 among GSC Investment Funding LLC, GSC Investment Corp., GSC (NJ),
L.P., the financial institutions from time to time party thereto, the commercial paper lenders from time to
time party thereto and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch.(5) |
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between GSC Investment Corp. and GSC Investment Funding LLC dated as of April 11,
2007.(5) |
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2007 among GSC Investment Funding LLC, Deutsche Bank
AG, New York Branch, GSC Investment Corp., and GSCP (NJ), L.P.(6) |
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of May 1, 2007 among GSC Investment Funding II LLC, GSC Investment Corp., GSC (NJ),
L.P., the financial institutions from time to time party thereto, the commercial paper lenders from time to
time party thereto and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch.(6) |
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Purchase Sale Agreement dated as of May 1, 2007 between GSC Investment Funding II LLC and GSC Investment
Corp.(6) |
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of May 1, 2007 between GSC Investment Corp. and GSC Partners CDO
Fund Limited.(6) |
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Amendment to Investment Advisory and Management Agreement dated May 23, 2007 between GSC Investment Corp. and
GSCP (NJ), L.P.(7) |
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated October 9, 2007 between GSC Investment Corp. and David Goret, as member of
the disclosure committee of GSC Investment Corp.(11) |
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated October 9, 2007 between GSC Investment Corp. and David Rice, as member of the
disclosure committee of GSC Investment Corp.(11) |
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Agreement Terminating Fee Reimbursement dated as of April 15, 2008 between GSCP (NJ), L.P. and GSC Investment
Corp.(10) |
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2008 among GSC Investment Funding LLC and Deutsche
Bank AG, New York Branch(12) |
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated October 15, 2008 between GSC Investment Corp. and Seth M, Katzenstein, as
director of GSC Investment Corp.(13) |
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated October 15, 2008 between GSC Investment Corp. and Seth M. Katzenstein as
Chief Executive Officer and President of GSC Investment Corp.(13) |
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Ethics of the Company adopted under Rule 17j-1.(3) |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries.(11) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Act of 1934, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to GSC Investment LLCs Registration Statement on Form N-2,
File No. 333-138051, filed on January 12, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to GSC Investment LLCs Registration Statement on Form N-2,
File No. 333-138051, filed on February 23, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 6 to GSC Investment Corp.s Registration Statement on
Form N-2, File No. 333-138051, filed on March 22, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corps Registration Statement on Form 8-A, File
No. 001-333-76, filed on March 21, 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corp.s Form 8-K, File No. 001-33376 dated April 11, 2007. |
52
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corp.s Form 8-K, File No. 001-33376 dated May 1, 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corp.s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28,
2007, file No. 001-33376. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corp.s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31,
2007, File No. 001-33376. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corp.s Form 8-K, File No. 001-33376 dated February 19, 2008. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corp.s Form 8-K, File No. 001-33376 dated April 15, 2008. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corp.s Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, File No. 001-33376. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corp.s Form 8-K, File No. 001-33376 dated August 8, 2008. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to GSC Investment Corp.s Form 8-K, File No. 001-33376 dated October 15, 2008. |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSC Investment Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 21, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Seth M. Katzenstein
Seth M. Katzenstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSC Investment Corp. |
|
|
* * * * *
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard M. Hayden
RICHARD M. HAYDEN
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
May 21, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Seth M. Katzenstein
SETH M. KATZENSTEIN
|
|
Director, Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
May 21, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard T. Allorto, Jr.
RICHARD T. ALLORTO, JR.
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
May 21, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert F. Cummings Jr.
ROBERT F. CUMMINGS, JR.
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors
|
|
May 21, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter K. Barker
PETER K. BARKER
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors
|
|
May 21, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven M. Looney
STEVEN M. LOONEY
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors
|
|
May 21, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Charles S. Whitman III
CHARLES S. WHITMAN III
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors
|
|
May 21, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ G. Cabell Williams
G. CABELL WILLIAMS
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors
|
|
May 21, 2009 |
54
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15 |
|
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of GSC Investment Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GSC Investment Corp. (the
Company), including the consolidated schedule of investments as of February 28, 2009 and February
29, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash
flows for the period from May 12, 2006 (date of inception) to February 28, 2007 and for each of the
two years ended February 28, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We
were not engaged to perform an audit of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of GSC Investment Corp. at February 28, 2009 and
February 29, 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations, changes in their net assets
and their cash flows for the period from May 12, 2006 to February 28, 2007 and for each of the two
years ended February 28, 2009 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Ernst & Young LLP
New York, NY
May 15, 2009
F-2
GSC Investment Corp.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate investments (amortized cost of $137,020,449 and $162,888,724, respectively) |
|
$ |
96,462,919 |
|
|
$ |
143,745,269 |
|
Control investments (cost of $29,905,194 and $30,000,000, respectively) |
|
|
22,439,029 |
|
|
|
29,075,299 |
|
Affiliate investments (cost of $0 and $0, respectively) |
|
|
10,527 |
|
|
|
16,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value (amortized cost of $166,925,643 and $192,888,724, respectively) |
|
|
118,912,475 |
|
|
|
172,836,801 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6,356,225 |
|
|
|
1,072,641 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts |
|
|
1,178,201 |
|
|
|
14,580,973 |
|
Outstanding interest rate cap at fair value (cost of $131,000 and $131,000, respectively) |
|
|
39,513 |
|
|
|
76,734 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
3,087,668 |
|
|
|
2,355,122 |
|
Due from manager |
|
|
|
|
|
|
940,903 |
|
Deferred credit facility financing costs, net |
|
|
529,767 |
|
|
|
723,231 |
|
Management fee receivable |
|
|
237,370 |
|
|
|
215,914 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
321,260 |
|
|
|
39,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
130,662,479 |
|
|
$ |
192,841,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
58,994,673 |
|
|
$ |
78,450,000 |
|
Payable for unsettled trades |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,329,150 |
|
Dividend payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,233,640 |
|
Management and incentive fees payable |
|
|
2,880,667 |
|
|
|
943,061 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
700,537 |
|
|
|
713,422 |
|
Interest and credit facility fees payable |
|
|
72,825 |
|
|
|
292,307 |
|
Due to manager |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
62,648,702 |
|
|
$ |
94,972,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.0001 per share, 100,000,000 common shares authorized, 8,291,384 and
8,291,384 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
110,943,738 |
|
|
|
116,218,966 |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income |
|
|
6,122,492 |
|
|
|
455,576 |
|
Accumulated undistributed net realized gain/(loss) from investments and derivatives |
|
|
(6,948,628 |
) |
|
|
1,299,858 |
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and derivatives |
|
|
(48,104,654 |
) |
|
|
(20,106,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
68,013,777 |
|
|
|
97,869,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
130,662,479 |
|
|
$ |
192,841,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE |
|
$ |
8.20 |
|
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
GSC Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 12, 2006 |
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
(date of inception) |
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
to February 28, 2007 |
|
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest from investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments |
|
$ |
16,572,973 |
|
|
$ |
20,115,301 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Control investments |
|
|
4,393,818 |
|
|
|
262,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
20,966,791 |
|
|
|
20,377,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest from cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
175,567 |
|
|
|
366,312 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Management fee income |
|
|
2,049,717 |
|
|
|
599,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
195,135 |
|
|
|
42,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income |
|
|
23,387,210 |
|
|
|
21,386,079 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and credit facility financing expenses |
|
|
2,605,367 |
|
|
|
5,031,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fees |
|
|
2,680,231 |
|
|
|
2,938,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees |
|
|
1,166,111 |
|
|
|
1,409,806 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Administrator expenses |
|
|
960,701 |
|
|
|
892,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive management fees |
|
|
1,752,254 |
|
|
|
711,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
682,154 |
|
|
|
586,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
Directors fees |
|
|
295,017 |
|
|
|
313,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
General & administrative |
|
|
289,477 |
|
|
|
261,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of acquiring management contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Organizational expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,542 |
|
|
|
95,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses before manager expense waiver and reimbursement |
|
|
10,431,312 |
|
|
|
12,338,878 |
|
|
|
130,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense reimbursement |
|
|
(1,010,416 |
) |
|
|
(1,789,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses net of expense waiver and reimbursement |
|
|
9,420,896 |
|
|
|
10,549,850 |
|
|
|
130,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
13,966,314 |
|
|
|
10,836,229 |
|
|
|
(130,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense, including excise tax |
|
|
(140,322 |
) |
|
|
(88,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
13,825,992 |
|
|
|
10,747,278 |
|
|
|
(130,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments |
|
|
(7,173,118 |
) |
|
|
2,707,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain from derivatives |
|
|
30,454 |
|
|
|
732,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments |
|
|
(27,961,244 |
) |
|
|
(20,051,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on derivatives |
|
|
(37,221 |
) |
|
|
(54,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on investments |
|
|
(35,141,129 |
) |
|
|
(16,198,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
(21,315,137 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,451,163 |
) |
|
$ |
(130,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
(2.57 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
|
8,291,384 |
|
|
|
7,761,965 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
GSC Investment Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
February 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Stockholders |
|
Company (a, c) |
|
Industry |
|
Rate/Maturity |
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equity |
|
Non-control/Non-affiliated investments 141.8% (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GFSI Inc (d)
|
|
Apparel
|
|
Senior Secured Notes 10.50%, 6/1/2011
|
|
$ |
7,082,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,082,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,616,004 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Legacy Cabinets, Inc. (d)
|
|
Building Products
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.75%, 8/18/2012
|
|
|
1,437,555 |
|
|
|
1,420,872 |
|
|
|
975,956 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Legacy Cabinets, Inc. (d)
|
|
Building Products
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan 9.75%, 8/18/2013
|
|
|
1,862,420 |
|
|
|
1,828,197 |
|
|
|
450,519 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Building Products
|
|
|
3,299,975 |
|
|
|
3,249,069 |
|
|
|
1,426,475 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.75%, 12/20/2013
|
|
|
32,381 |
|
|
|
27,281 |
|
|
|
6,152 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.47%, 12/20/2013
|
|
|
77,141 |
|
|
|
64,991 |
|
|
|
14,657 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.16%, 12/20/2014
|
|
|
92,962 |
|
|
|
78,320 |
|
|
|
17,663 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.16%, 12/20/2014
|
|
|
92,962 |
|
|
|
78,320 |
|
|
|
17,663 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.16%, 12/20/2014
|
|
|
92,962 |
|
|
|
78,320 |
|
|
|
17,663 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.75%, 12/20/2013
|
|
|
121,428 |
|
|
|
102,303 |
|
|
|
23,071 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.75%, 12/20/2013
|
|
|
231,354 |
|
|
|
194,916 |
|
|
|
43,957 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
7.00%, 12/20/2014
|
|
|
403,388 |
|
|
|
339,854 |
|
|
|
76,644 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
7.00%, 12/20/2014
|
|
|
403,388 |
|
|
|
339,854 |
|
|
|
76,644 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Lyondell Chemical Company (d)
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
7.00%, 12/20/2014
|
|
|
403,388 |
|
|
|
339,854 |
|
|
|
76,644 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Chemicals
|
|
|
1,951,354 |
|
|
|
1,644,013 |
|
|
|
370,758 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation (d)
|
|
Consumer Products
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
7.70%, 1/26/2012
|
|
|
3,250,000 |
|
|
|
3,246,870 |
|
|
|
2,627,950 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Targus Group International, Inc. (d)
|
|
Consumer Products
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
4.67%, 11/22/2012
|
|
|
3,122,943 |
|
|
|
2,895,723 |
|
|
|
2,089,561 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Targus Group International, Inc. (d)
|
|
Consumer Products
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
9.75%, 5/22/2013
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,777,205 |
|
|
|
3,126,000 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Products
|
|
|
11,372,943 |
|
|
|
10,919,798 |
|
|
|
7,843,511 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CFF Acquisition LLC (d)
|
|
Consumer Services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
8.57%, 7/31/2013
|
|
|
308,912 |
|
|
|
308,912 |
|
|
|
243,793 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
M/C Communications, LLC (d)
|
|
Education
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
13.12%, 12/31/2010
|
|
|
1,697,164 |
|
|
|
1,590,350 |
|
|
|
674,283 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc. (d)
|
|
Electronics
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
8.53%, 6/1/2014
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,771,457 |
|
|
|
1,503,200 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
GSC Investment Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
February 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Stockholders |
|
Company (a, c) |
|
Industry |
|
Rate/Maturity |
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equity |
|
Group Dekko (d)
|
|
Electronics
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
6.45%, 1/20/2012
|
|
$ |
6,670,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,670,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,321,326 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
IPC Systems, Inc. (d)
|
|
Electronics
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
3.71%, 3/31/2014
|
|
|
46,332 |
|
|
|
42,367 |
|
|
|
24,621 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Electronics
|
|
|
8,716,332 |
|
|
|
8,483,824 |
|
|
|
6,849,147 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USS Mergerco, Inc. (d)
|
|
Environmental
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
4.73%, 6/29/2013
|
|
|
5,960,000 |
|
|
|
5,846,833 |
|
|
|
3,592,092 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc.
(d)
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
6.70%, 7/31/2013
|
|
|
4,887,500 |
|
|
|
4,858,282 |
|
|
|
3,053,221 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Big Train, Inc. (d)
|
|
Food and Beverage
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
4.98%, 3/31/2012
|
|
|
2,478,660 |
|
|
|
1,671,647 |
|
|
|
1,706,557 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
IDI Acquisition Corp. (d)
|
|
Healthcare Services
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
10.75%, 12/15/2011
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
|
|
3,623,605 |
|
|
|
2,428,580 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
PRACS Institute, LTD (d)
|
|
Healthcare Services
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
11.13%, 4/17/2013
|
|
|
4,093,750 |
|
|
|
4,047,419 |
|
|
|
3,581,213 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Healthcare Services
|
|
|
7,893,750 |
|
|
|
7,671,024 |
|
|
|
6,009,793 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McMillin Companies LLC (d)
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
9.53%, 4/30/2012
|
|
|
7,700,000 |
|
|
|
7,294,643 |
|
|
|
3,489,640 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Stockholders |
|
Company (a, c) |
|
Industry |
|
Rate/Maturity |
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equity |
|
Asurion Corporation (d)
|
|
Insurance
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
3.76%, 7/3/2014
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,704,665 |
|
|
$ |
1,493,400 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Worldwide Express Operations, LLC (d)
|
|
Logistics
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
6.95%, 6/30/2013
|
|
|
2,820,779 |
|
|
|
2,815,612 |
|
|
|
2,133,637 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Jason Incorporated (d)
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
Unsecured Notes
13.00%, 11/1/2010
|
|
|
12,000,000 |
|
|
|
12,000,000 |
|
|
|
8,652,000 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
Jason Incorporated (d)
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
Unsecured Notes
13.00%, 11/1/2010
|
|
|
1,700,000 |
|
|
|
1,700,000 |
|
|
|
1,225,700 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Specialized Technology Resources, Inc.
(d)
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
7.48%, 12/15/2014
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,769,304 |
|
|
|
4,602,000 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Manufacturing
|
|
|
18,700,000 |
|
|
|
18,469,304 |
|
|
|
14,479,700 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blaze Recycling & Metals, LLC (d)
|
|
Metals
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
10.88%, 7/15/2012
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,494,342 |
|
|
|
1,850,500 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Elyria Foundry Company, LLC (d)
|
|
Metals
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
13.00%, 3/1/2013
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,853,894 |
|
|
|
3,753,000 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Elyria Foundry Company, LLC
|
|
Metals
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,610 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Metals
|
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
|
7,348,236 |
|
|
|
5,693,110 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada
(d, e)
|
|
Natural Resources
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
11.50%, 3/30/2009
|
|
|
2,948,640 |
|
|
|
2,940,073 |
|
|
|
2,081,740 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Grant U.S. Holdings LLP (d, e)
|
|
Natural Resources
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
9.81%, 9/20/2013
|
|
|
6,139,928 |
|
|
|
6,139,764 |
|
|
|
2,388,432 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Natural Resources
|
|
|
9,088,568 |
|
|
|
9,079,837 |
|
|
|
4,470,172 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edgen Murray II, L.P. (d)
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
7.24%, 5/11/2015
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,815,938 |
|
|
|
2,072,700 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Energy Alloys, LLC (d)
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
11.75%, 10/5/2012
|
|
|
6,200,000 |
|
|
|
6,200,000 |
|
|
|
5,286,740 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Oil and Gas
|
|
|
9,200,000 |
|
|
|
9,015,938 |
|
|
|
7,359,440 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stronghaven, Inc. (d)
|
|
Packaging
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
13.00%, 10/31/2010
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,375,500 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e)
|
|
Packaging
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
12.50%, 6/15/2009
|
|
|
4,850,000 |
|
|
|
4,846,976 |
|
|
|
3,575,420 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e)
|
|
Packaging
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
12.50%, 6/15/2009
|
|
|
5,087,250 |
|
|
|
5,084,820 |
|
|
|
3,750,321 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e)
|
|
Packaging
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
12.02%, 6/15/2009
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
499,670 |
|
|
|
368,600 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Packaging
|
|
|
12,937,250 |
|
|
|
12,931,466 |
|
|
|
10,069,841 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Direct, Inc. (d)
|
|
Printing
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
4.21%, 12/31/2013
|
|
|
2,049,694 |
|
|
|
1,618,148 |
|
|
|
1,638,526 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Advanstar Communications Inc. (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
3.71%, 5/31/2014
|
|
|
1,970,000 |
|
|
|
1,553,133 |
|
|
|
807,700 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Affinity Group, Inc. (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
3.01%, 6/24/2009
|
|
|
476,261 |
|
|
|
468,285 |
|
|
|
418,872 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Affinity Group, Inc. (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
2.98%, 6/24/2009
|
|
|
511,811 |
|
|
|
503,239 |
|
|
|
450,137 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Brown Publishing Company (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
8.76%, 9/19/2014
|
|
|
1,203,226 |
|
|
|
1,198,390 |
|
|
|
288,774 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Network Communications, Inc. (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
Unsecured Notes
10.75%, 12/1/2013
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
5,082,100 |
|
|
|
2,503,000 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Penton Media, Inc. (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
3.35%, 2/1/2013
|
|
|
4,897,651 |
|
|
|
3,723,761 |
|
|
|
2,008,037 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Publishing
|
|
|
14,058,949 |
|
|
|
12,528,908 |
|
|
|
6,476,520 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GXS Worldwide, Inc. (d)
|
|
Software
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
8.63%, 9/30/2013
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
887,940 |
|
|
|
773,299 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total Non-control/Non-affiliated investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,020,449 |
|
|
|
96,462,919 |
|
|
|
141.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Stockholders |
|
Company (a, c) |
|
Industry |
|
Rate/Maturity |
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equity |
|
Control investments 33.0% (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP (h)
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
100% General
Partnership interest
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98,412 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007 LTD.
(f, h)
|
|
Structured Finance Securities
|
|
Other/Structured
Finance Securities
12.15%, 1/21/2020
|
|
|
30,000,000 |
|
|
|
29,905,194 |
|
|
|
22,340,617 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,905,194 |
|
|
|
22,439,029 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments 0.0% (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP (g)
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
6.24% Limited
Partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,527 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT ASSETS 174.8% (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166,925,643 |
|
|
$ |
118,912,475 |
|
|
|
174.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Stockholders |
|
Outstanding interest rate cap |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Equity |
|
Interest rate cap |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
2/9/2014 |
|
|
$ |
40,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
87,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,682 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Interest rate cap |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
11/30/2013 |
|
|
|
26,433,408 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
|
11,831 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total Outstanding interest rate cap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
131,000 |
|
|
$ |
39,513 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All of the Funds equity and debt investments are issued by eligible portfolio companies,
as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, except Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada,
Grant U.S. Holdings LLP, GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Terphane Holdings Corp., and GSC Partners
CDO GP III, LP. |
|
(b) |
|
Percentages are based on net assets of $68,013,777 as of February 28, 2009. |
|
(c) |
|
Fair valued investment (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements). |
|
(d) |
|
All or a portion of the securities are pledged as collateral under a revolving
securitized credit facility (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements). |
|
(e) |
|
Non-U.S. company. The principal place of business for Terphane Holdings Corp is Brazil,
and for Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada and Grant U.S. Holdings LLP is Canada. |
|
(f) |
|
12.15% represents the modeled effective interest rate that is expected to be earned over
the life of the investment. |
|
(g) |
|
As defined in the Investment Company Act, we are an Affiliate of this portfolio company
because we own 5% or more of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. Transactions
during the period in which the issuer was an Affiliate are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Management |
|
Net Realized |
|
Net Unrealized |
Company |
|
Purchases |
|
Redemptions |
|
Sales (cost) |
|
Income |
|
fee income |
|
gains/(losses) |
|
gains/(losses) |
GSC Partners CDO GP
III, LP |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,706 |
) |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
As defined in the Investment Company Act, we are an Affiliate of this portfolio company
because we own 5% or more of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. In addition, as
defined in the Investment Company Act, we Control this portfolio company because we own more than
25% of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the period in
which the issuer was both an Affiliate and a portfolio company that we Control are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Management |
|
Net Realized |
|
Net Unrealized |
Company |
|
Purchases |
|
Redemptions |
|
Sales (cost) |
|
Income |
|
fee income |
|
gains/(losses) |
|
gains/(losses) |
GSC Investment
Corp. CLO 2007 LTD. |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,393,818 |
|
|
$ |
2,049,717 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,479,722 |
) |
GSC Partners CDO GP
III, LP |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(61,741 |
) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
GSC Investment Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Stockholders |
|
Company (a, c) |
|
Industry |
|
Rate/Maturity |
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equity |
|
Non-control/Non-affiliated investments 146.9% (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EuroFresh Inc. (d)
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
Unsecured Notes
11.50%, 1/15/2013
|
|
$ |
7,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,890,639 |
|
|
$ |
3,850,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
GFSI Inc (d)
|
|
Apparel
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
10.50%, 6/1/2011
|
|
|
8,425,000 |
|
|
|
8,421,760 |
|
|
|
8,003,750 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
Key Safety Systems (d)
|
|
Automotive
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
6.68%, 3/8/2014
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,837,500 |
|
|
|
1,875,000 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
SILLC Holdings, LLC (d)
|
|
Automotive
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
9.86%, 5/24/2011
|
|
|
23,049,210 |
|
|
|
22,865,049 |
|
|
|
20,283,305 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Automotive
|
|
|
25,549,210 |
|
|
|
24,702,549 |
|
|
|
22,158,305 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Cabinets, Inc. (d)
|
|
Building Products
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
8.56%, 8/18/2012
|
|
|
1,871,500 |
|
|
|
1,847,290 |
|
|
|
1,403,625 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Legacy Cabinets, Inc. (d)
|
|
Building Products
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
12.31%, 8/18/2013
|
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
|
2,354,989 |
|
|
|
1,560,000 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Building Products
|
|
|
4,271,500 |
|
|
|
4,202,280 |
|
|
|
2,963,625 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation (d)
|
|
Consumer Products
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
11.82%, 1/26/2012
|
|
|
3,250,000 |
|
|
|
3,245,793 |
|
|
|
3,152,500 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Targus Group International, Inc. (d)
|
|
Consumer Products
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
7.61%, 11/22/2012
|
|
|
3,408,271 |
|
|
|
3,095,060 |
|
|
|
2,851,701 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Targus Group International, Inc. (d)
|
|
Consumer Products
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
13.35%, 5/22/2013
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,743,768 |
|
|
|
4,016,500 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Products
|
|
|
11,658,271 |
|
|
|
11,084,621 |
|
|
|
10,020,701 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affinity Group, Inc. (d)
|
|
Consumer Services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.62%, 6/24/2009
|
|
|
481,233 |
|
|
|
449,953 |
|
|
|
444,371 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Affinity Group, Inc. (d)
|
|
Consumer Services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.74%, 6/24/2009
|
|
|
518,767 |
|
|
|
485,047 |
|
|
|
479,859 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
CFF Acquisition LLC (d)
|
|
Consumer Services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
8.77%, 7/31/2013
|
|
|
406,228 |
|
|
|
406,228 |
|
|
|
365,605 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Services
|
|
|
1,406,228 |
|
|
|
1,341,228 |
|
|
|
1,289,835 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/C Communications, LLC (d)
|
|
Education
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.54%, 12/31/2010
|
|
|
1,736,766 |
|
|
|
1,571,773 |
|
|
|
1,545,721 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Group Dekko (d)
|
|
Electronics
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
9.38%, 1/20/2012
|
|
|
6,670,000 |
|
|
|
6,670,000 |
|
|
|
6,336,500 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
IPC Systems, Inc. (d)
|
|
Electronics
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
7.09%, 5/31/2014
|
|
|
49,750 |
|
|
|
44,647 |
|
|
|
40,497 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Electronics
|
|
|
6,719,750 |
|
|
|
6,714,647 |
|
|
|
6,376,997 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USS Mergerco, Inc. (d)
|
|
Environmental
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
9.08%, 6/29/2013
|
|
|
5,960,000 |
|
|
|
5,827,121 |
|
|
|
5,066,000 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Bankruptcy Management Solutions,
Inc. (d)
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
9.37%, 7/31/2013
|
|
|
4,937,500 |
|
|
|
4,902,101 |
|
|
|
3,555,000 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Realogy Corp. (d)
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
6.11%, 10/10/2013
|
|
|
21,106 |
|
|
|
19,693 |
|
|
|
17,746 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Realogy Corp. (d)
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
7.51%, 10/10/2013
|
|
|
78,394 |
|
|
|
73,147 |
|
|
|
65,733 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financial Services
|
|
|
5,037,000 |
|
|
|
4,994,941 |
|
|
|
3,638,479 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCM Merger Inc. (d)
|
|
Gaming
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
6.35%, 7/13/2012
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,670,000 |
|
|
|
1,730,000 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
IDI Acquisition Corp. (d)
|
|
Healthcare Services
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
10.75%, 12/15/2011
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
|
|
3,574,228 |
|
|
|
3,040,000 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
PRACS Institute, LTD (d)
|
|
Healthcare Services
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
11.41%, 4/17/2013
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Healthcare Services
|
|
|
6,800,000 |
|
|
|
6,574,228 |
|
|
|
6,040,000 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9
GSC Investment Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Stockholders |
|
Company (a, c) |
|
Industry |
|
Rate/Maturity |
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equity |
|
McMillin Companies LLC (d)
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
9.53%, 4/30/2012
|
|
$ |
7,700,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,194,636 |
|
|
$ |
5,912,060 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Asurion Corporation (d)
|
|
Insurance
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
6.10%, 7/3/2014
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,665,000 |
|
|
|
1,699,600 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Worldwide Express Operations, LLC (d)
|
|
Logistics
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
7.89%, 6/30/2013
|
|
|
2,973,362 |
|
|
|
2,966,658 |
|
|
|
2,687,919 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Jason Incorporated (d)
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
Unsecured Notes
13.00%, 11/1/2008
|
|
|
12,000,000 |
|
|
|
12,000,000 |
|
|
|
11,712,000 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
Jason Incorporated (d)
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
Unsecured Notes
13.00%, 11/1/2008
|
|
|
3,400,000 |
|
|
|
3,400,000 |
|
|
|
3,318,400 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Manufacturing
|
|
|
15,400,000 |
|
|
|
15,400,000 |
|
|
|
15,030,400 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blaze Recycling & Metals, LLC (d)
|
|
Metals
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
10.88%, 7/15/2012
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,493,087 |
|
|
|
2,218,750 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Elyria Foundry Company, LLC (c, d)
|
|
Metals
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
13.00%, 3/1/2013
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,893,873 |
|
|
|
2,910,000 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Metals
|
|
|
5,500,000 |
|
|
|
5,386,960 |
|
|
|
5,128,750 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant U.S. Holdings LLP (d, e)
|
|
Natural Resources
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
12.75%, 9/20/2013
|
|
|
5,365,592 |
|
|
|
5,365,393 |
|
|
|
4,167,456 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Stockholders |
|
Company (a, c) |
|
Industry |
|
Rate/Maturity |
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equity |
|
Edgen Murray II, L.P. (d)
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
9.32%, 5/11/2015
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,947,348 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Energy Alloys, LLC (d)
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
12.15%, 10/5/2012
|
|
|
6,200,000 |
|
|
|
6,200,000 |
|
|
|
6,138,000 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Oil and Gas
|
|
|
8,200,000 |
|
|
|
8,147,348 |
|
|
|
7,738,000 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlantis Plastics Films, Inc. (d)
|
|
Packaging
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
8.71%, 9/22/2011
|
|
|
6,516,244 |
|
|
|
6,491,835 |
|
|
|
4,298,114 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Stronghaven, Inc. (d)
|
|
Packaging
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
11.00%, 10/31/2010
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e)
|
|
Packaging
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
12.50%, 6/15/2009
|
|
|
4,850,000 |
|
|
|
4,853,648 |
|
|
|
4,447,450 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e)
|
|
Packaging
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
12.50%, 6/15/2009
|
|
|
5,087,250 |
|
|
|
5,094,096 |
|
|
|
4,665,008 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e)
|
|
Packaging
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
15.11%, 6/15/2009
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
498,536 |
|
|
|
459,500 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Packaging
|
|
|
19,453,494 |
|
|
|
19,438,114 |
|
|
|
16,370,073 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanstar Communications Inc. (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
7.09%, 5/31/2014
|
|
|
1,990,000 |
|
|
|
1,516,878 |
|
|
|
1,492,500 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Brown Publishing Company (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
Second Lien Term Loan
11.09%, 9/19/2014
|
|
|
1,203,226 |
|
|
|
1,197,520 |
|
|
|
1,070,871 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Network Communications, Inc. (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
Unsecured Notes
10.75%, 12/1/2013
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
5,095,198 |
|
|
|
4,400,000 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Penton Media, Inc. (d)
|
|
Publishing
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
5.37%, 2/1/2013
|
|
|
2,962,500 |
|
|
|
2,134,841 |
|
|
|
2,325,563 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Publishing
|
|
|
11,155,726 |
|
|
|
9,944,437 |
|
|
|
9,288,934 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QCE LLC (d)
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
7.03%, 5/5/2013
|
|
|
992,443 |
|
|
|
804,673 |
|
|
|
859,456 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Claires Stores, Inc. (d)
|
|
Retail
|
|
First Lien Term Loan
6.47%, 5/29/2014
|
|
|
2,786,000 |
|
|
|
2,579,717 |
|
|
|
2,179,209 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total Non-control/Non-affiliated investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,888,724 |
|
|
|
143,745,269 |
|
|
|
146.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments 29.7% (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSC CDO III, LLC (g)
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
100% General
Partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,153 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007 LTD.
(g)
|
|
Structured Finance Securities
|
|
Other/Structured Finance Securities
20.36%, 1/21/2020
|
|
|
30,000,000 |
|
|
|
30,000,000 |
|
|
|
28,915,146 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000,000 |
|
|
|
29,075,299 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments 0.0% (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP (f)
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
6.24% Limited
Partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,233 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT ASSETS 176.6% (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
192,888,724 |
|
|
$ |
172,836,801 |
|
|
|
176.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
Outstanding interest rate cap |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
Interest rate cap |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
2/9/2014 |
|
|
$ |
40,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
87,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,703 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Interest rate cap |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
11/30/2013 |
|
|
|
46,637,408 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
|
26,031 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total Outstanding interest rate cap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
131,000 |
|
|
$ |
76,734 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-11
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All of the Funds equity and debt investments are issued by eligible portfolio companies,
as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, except Atlantis Plastics Films, Inc., Grant U.S.
Holdings LLP, GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Terphane Holdings Corp., and GSC Partners CDO GP III,
LP. |
|
(b) |
|
Percentages are based on net assets of $97,869,040 as of February 29, 2008. |
|
(c) |
|
Fair valued investment (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements). |
|
(d) |
|
All or a portion of the investment is pledged as collateral under a revolving securitized
credit facility (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements). |
|
(e) |
|
Non-U.S. company. The principal place of business for Terphane Holdings Corp is Brazil,
and for Grant U.S. Holdings LLP is Canada. |
|
(f) |
|
As defined in the Investment Company Act, we are an Affiliate of this portfolio company
because we own 5% or more of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. Transactions
during the period in which the issuer was an Affiliate are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Management |
|
Net Realized |
|
Net Unrealized |
Company |
|
Purchases |
|
Redemptions |
|
Sales (cost) |
|
Income |
|
fee income |
|
gains/(losses) |
|
gains/(losses) |
GSC Partners CDO GP
III, LP |
|
$ |
2,045,067 |
|
|
$ |
2,084,214 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,147 |
|
|
$ |
16,233 |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
|
As defined in the Investment Company Act, we are an Affiliate of this portfolio company
because we own 5% or more of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. In addition, as
defined in the Investment Company Act, we Control this portfolio company because we own more than
25% of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the period in
which the issuer was both an Affiliate and a portfolio company that we Control are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Management |
|
Net Realized |
|
Net Unrealized |
Company |
|
Purchases |
|
Redemptions |
|
Sales (cost) |
|
Income |
|
fee income |
|
gains/(losses) |
|
gains/(losses) |
GSC Investment
Corp. CLO 2007 LTD. |
|
$ |
30,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
262,442 |
|
|
$ |
215,914 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,084,854 |
) |
GSC Partners CDO GP
III, LP |
|
$ |
13,574,694 |
|
|
$ |
14,003,367 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
428,673 |
|
|
$ |
160,153 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-12
GSC Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 12, 2006 (date of |
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
inception) |
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
to February 28, 2007 |
|
OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
13,825,992 |
|
|
$ |
10,747,278 |
|
|
$ |
(130,163 |
) |
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
|
|
(7,173,118 |
) |
|
|
3,175,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain from derivatives |
|
|
30,454 |
|
|
|
732,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments |
|
|
(27,961,244 |
) |
|
|
(20,051,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on derivatives |
|
|
(37,221 |
) |
|
|
(54,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations |
|
|
(21,315,137 |
) |
|
|
(5,451,163 |
) |
|
|
(130,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared |
|
|
(8,540,126 |
) |
|
|
(12,851,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from shareholder distributions |
|
|
(8,540,126 |
) |
|
|
(12,851,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,301,011 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,301,011 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase/(decrease) in net assets |
|
|
(29,855,263 |
) |
|
|
97,998,203 |
|
|
|
(129,163 |
) |
Net assets at beginning of year/period |
|
|
97,869,040 |
|
|
|
(129,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of year/period |
|
$ |
68,013,777 |
|
|
$ |
97,869,040 |
|
|
$ |
(129,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per common share |
|
$ |
8.20 |
|
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period |
|
|
8,291,384 |
|
|
|
8,291,384 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-13
GSC Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 12, 2006 (date |
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
of inception) |
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
to February 28, 2007 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
(21,315,137 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,451,163 |
) |
|
$ |
(130,163 |
) |
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS TO NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in-kind interest income |
|
|
(819,905 |
) |
|
|
(365,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net accretion of discount on investments |
|
|
(1,323,644 |
) |
|
|
(765,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred credit facility financing costs |
|
|
193,464 |
|
|
|
502,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized (gain) loss from investments |
|
|
7,173,118 |
|
|
|
(3,175,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net realized
(gain) from derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(732,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments |
|
|
27,961,244 |
|
|
|
20,051,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized depreciation on
derivatives |
|
|
37,221 |
|
|
|
54,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale and redemption of investments |
|
|
49,193,508 |
|
|
|
141,772,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(28,259,995 |
) |
|
|
(314,002,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts |
|
|
13,402,772 |
|
|
|
(14,580,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
(732,546 |
) |
|
|
(2,355,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Due from manager |
|
|
940,903 |
|
|
|
(940,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Management fee receivable |
|
|
(21,456 |
) |
|
|
(215,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
(281,911 |
) |
|
|
(39,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred offering costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
808,617 |
|
|
|
(808,617 |
) |
Payable for unsettled trades |
|
|
(11,329,150 |
) |
|
|
11,329,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
Management and incentive fees payable |
|
|
1,937,606 |
|
|
|
943,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(12,885 |
) |
|
|
608,422 |
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
Interest and credit facility fees payable |
|
|
(219,482 |
) |
|
|
292,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due to manager |
|
|
(11,048 |
) |
|
|
(62,762 |
) |
|
|
73,810 |
|
Accrued offering costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(760,000 |
) |
|
|
760,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
36,512,677 |
|
|
|
(167,084,935 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Issuance of shares of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs and sales load |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,068,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on debt |
|
|
7,800,000 |
|
|
|
167,958,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paydowns on debt |
|
|
(27,255,327 |
) |
|
|
(89,508,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Credit facility financing cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,225,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cost of interest rate cap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments of cash dividends |
|
|
(11,773,766 |
) |
|
|
(9,618,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(31,229,093 |
) |
|
|
168,156,546 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
5,283,584 |
|
|
|
1,071,611 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
1,072,641 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
6,356,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,072,641 |
|
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the period |
|
$ |
2,631,385 |
|
|
$ |
4,236,458 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for acquisition of investments in GSC CDO III, LLC
and GSC Partners CDO GP III, L.P. |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,619,761 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Paid-in-kind interest income |
|
$ |
819,905 |
|
|
$ |
365,592 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Net accretion of discount on investments |
|
$ |
1,323,644 |
|
|
$ |
765,255 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Amortization of deferred credit facility financing costs |
|
$ |
193,464 |
|
|
$ |
502,468 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-14
GSC INVESTMENT CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
GSC Investment Corp. (the Company, we and us) is a non-diversified closed end management
investment company incorporated in Maryland that has elected to be treated and is regulated as a
business development company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). We
commenced operations on March 23, 2007 and completed our initial public offering (IPO) on March
28, 2007. We have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (RIC) under subchapter
M of the Internal Revenue Code. We expect to continue to qualify and to elect to be treated for tax
purposes as a RIC. Our investment objectives are to generate both current income and capital
appreciation through debt and equity investments by primarily investing in private middle market
companies and select high yield bonds.
GSC Investment, LLC (the LLC) was organized in May 2006 as a Maryland limited liability company.
As of February 28, 2007, the LLC had not yet commenced its operations and investment activities.
On March 21, 2007, the Company was incorporated and concurrently, the LLC was merged with and into
the Company in accordance with the procedure for such merger in the LLCs limited liability company
agreement and Maryland law. In connection with such merger, each outstanding common share of the
LLC was converted into an equivalent number of shares of common stock of the Company and the
Company is the surviving entity.
We are externally managed and advised by our investment adviser, GSCP (NJ), L.P. (individually and
collectively with its affiliates, GSC Group or the Manager), pursuant to an investment advisory
and management agreement.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of
accounting in conformity with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and include
the accounts of the Company and its special purpose financing subsidiaries, GSC Investment Funding,
LLC and GSC Investment Funding II, LLC. The consolidated financial statements reflect all
adjustments and reclassifications which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair
presentation of the results of the operations and financial condition for the periods presented.
All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All references
made to the Company, we, and us in the financial statements encompassing of these
consolidated subsidiaries, except as stated otherwise.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the period
reported. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term, liquid investments in a money market fund. Cash and
cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value.
Cash and cash equivalents, Securitization Accounts
Cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts include amounts held in designated bank accounts
in the form of cash and short-term liquid investments in money market funds representing payments
received on securitized investments or other reserved amounts associated with the Companys
securitization facilities. The Company is required to use a portion of these amounts to pay
interest expense, reduce borrowings, or pay other amounts in accordance with the related
securitization agreements. Cash held in such accounts may not be available for the general use of
the Company.
Risk Management
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company manages a variety of risks, including market
risk and credit risk. Market risk is the risk of potential adverse changes to the value of
investments because of changes in market conditions such as interest rate movements and volatility
in investment prices.
F-15
Credit risk is the risk of default or non-performance by portfolio companies equivalent to the
investments carrying amount.
The Company is also exposed to credit risk related to maintaining all of its cash and cash
equivalents including those in securitization accounts at a major financial institution and credit
risk related to the derivative counterparty.
The Company has investments in lower rated and comparable quality unrated high yield bonds and bank
loans. Investments in high yield investments are accompanied by a greater degree of credit risk.
The risk of loss due to default by the issuer is significantly greater for holders of high yield
securities, because such investments are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other
creditors of the issuer.
Investment Classification
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under
the 1940 Act, Control Investments are defined as investments in companies in which we own more
than 25% of the voting securities or maintain greater than 50% of the board representation. Under
the 1940 Act, Affiliated Investments are defined as those non-control investments in companies in
which we own between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, Non-affiliated
Investments are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments or Affiliated
Investments.
Investment Valuation
The fair value of the Companys assets and liabilities which qualify as financial instruments under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, approximates the carrying amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheet.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are fair valued at such market
quotations obtained from independent third party pricing services and market makers subject to any
decision by our board of directors to make a fair value determination to reflect significant events
affecting the value of these investments. We value investments for which market quotations are not
readily available as stated above at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of
directors based on input from our Manager, our audit committee and, if our board or audit committee
so request, a third party independent valuation firm. Determinations of fair value may involve
subjective judgments and estimates. The types of factors that may be considered in a fair value
pricing include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability
to make payments, market yield trend analysis, the markets in which the portfolio company does
business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.
We undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter when valuing investments for which market
quotations are not readily available, as described below:
|
|
|
Each investment is initially valued by the responsible investment professionals and
preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with our senior management;
and |
|
|
|
|
An independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors reviews at least one
quarter of these preliminary valuations each quarter so that the valuation of each
investment for which market quotes are not readily available is reviewed by the independent
valuation firm at least annually. |
In addition, all our investments are subject to the following valuation process.
|
|
|
The audit committee of our board of directors reviews each preliminary valuation and our
investment adviser and independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the
preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee; and |
|
|
|
|
Our board of directors discuss the valuations and determine the fair value of each
investment in good faith based on the input of our investment adviser, independent
valuation firm (if applicable) and audit committee. |
Our equity investment in GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd. (GSCIC CLO) is carried at fair
value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and
loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the
characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for similar CLO equity, when
available, as determined by our investment advisor and recommended to our board of directors.
Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies,
are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on
estimates. The determination of fair value by our board of directors may differ materially from the
values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset
value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our
investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the
disposal of such investments.
F-16
We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, (FAS
133) as amended. FAS 133 requires recognizing all derivative instruments as either assets or
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The Company values derivative
contracts at the closing fair value provided by the counterparty. Changes in the values of
derivative contracts are included in the consolidated statement of operations.
Income Recognition
Purchases and sales of investments and the related realized gains or losses are recorded on a
trade-date basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount,
is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The
Company stops accruing interest on its investments when it is determined that interest is no longer
collectible. If any cash is received after it is determined that interest is no longer collectible,
we will treat the cash as payment on the principal balance until the entire principal balance has
been repaid, before any interest income is recognized. Discounts and premiums on investments
purchased are accreted/amortized over the life of the respective investment using the effective
yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the
accretion of discounts and amortizations of premium on investments.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when there is reasonable doubt that principal or
interest will be collected. Accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed on
non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as principal
depending upon managements judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to
accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in managements judgment, are
likely to remain current. The Company may make exceptions to this if the loan has sufficient
collateral value and is in the process of collection.
Interest income on our investment in GSCIC CLO is recorded using the effective interest method in
accordance with the provision of EITF 99-20, based on the anticipated yield and the estimated cash
flows over the projected life of the investment. Yields are revised when there are changes in
actual or estimated cash flows due to changes in prepayments and/or re-investments, credit losses
or asset pricing. Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an adjustment to the estimated
yield over the remaining life of the investment from the date the estimated yield was changed.
Paid-in-Kind Interest
The Company includes in income certain amounts that it has not yet received in cash, such as
contractual paid-in-kind interest (PIK), which represents contractually deferred interest added
to the investment balance that is generally due at maturity. We stop accruing PIK if we do not
expect the issuer to be able to pay all principal and interest when due.
Organizational Expenses
Organizational expenses consist principally of professional fees incurred in connection with the
organization of the Company and have been expensed as incurred.
Deferred Credit Facility Financing Costs
Financing costs incurred in connection with each respective credit facility have been deferred and
are being amortized using the straight line method over the life of each respective facility.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may enter into contracts or agreements that
contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of
these provisions against the Company. Based on its history and experience, management feels that
the likelihood of such an event is remote.
Income Taxes
The Company has filed an election to be treated for tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the
Code and, among other things, intends to make the requisite distributions to its stockholders which
will relieve the Company from federal income taxes. Therefore, no provision has been recorded for
federal income taxes.
In order to qualify as a RIC, among other requirements, the Company is required to timely
distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by
the Code, for each fiscal tax year. The Company will be subject to a nondeductible U.S. federal
excise tax of 4% on undistributed income if we do not distribute at least 98% of our investment
company taxable income in any calendar year and 98% of our capital gain net income for each
one-year period ending on October 31.
F-17
Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward
taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4%
excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its
estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend
distributions, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as
taxable income is earned. For the year ended February 28, 2009 provisions of $140,322 were recorded
for Federal excise taxes. As of February 28, 2009, the entire $140,322 was unpaid and included in
accounts payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. This amount was paid subsequent to
year end.
The Company has adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with
FASB No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
In May 2007, the FASB issued Staff Position, FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement in FASB
Interpretation No. 48 (FSP FIN 48-1), which provides guidance on how an enterprise should
determine whether a tax position is
effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP FIN
48-1 is effective with the initial adoption of FIN 48. The adoption of FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1 did
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Dividends
Dividends to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount to be paid out as
a dividend is determined by the board of directors. Net realized capital gains, if any, are
generally distributed at least annually, although we may decide to retain such capital gains for
reinvestment.
The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of our dividend
distributions on behalf of our stockholders unless a stockholder elects to receive cash. As a
result, if our board of directors authorizes, and we declare, a cash dividend, then our
stockholders who have not opted out of our dividend reinvestment plan will have their cash
dividends automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving
the cash dividends. If the Companys common stock is trading below net asset value at the time of
valuation, the plan administrator will receive the dividend or distribution in cash and will
purchase common stock in the open market, on the New York Stock Exchange or elsewhere, for the
account of each Participant.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(FAS 159), which provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and
liabilities at fair value. The objective of FAS 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for
financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently. FAS 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to
facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar
types of assets and liabilities and to more easily understand the effect of the companys choice to
use fair value on its earnings. FAS 159 also requires entities to display the fair value of the
selected assets and liabilities on the face of the balance sheet. FAS 159 does not eliminate
disclosure requirements of other accounting standards, including fair value measurement disclosures
in FAS 157. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect fair value measurement for assets or
liabilities other than portfolio investments, which are already measured at fair value, therefore,
the adoption of this statement did not have a significant effect on the Companys financial
position or its results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 161). The objective of FAS 161 is to
improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring
enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. FAS 161 improves transparency about the
location and amounts of derivative instruments in an entitys financial statements; how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS 133; and how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect its financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. FAS 161 achieves these improvements by requiring disclosure of the fair values of derivative
instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. It also provides more information about
an entitys liquidity by requiring disclosure of derivative features that are credit risk related.
Finally, it requires cross-referencing within footnotes to enable financial statement users to
locate important information about derivative instruments. FAS 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
early application encouraged. The Company did not early adopt FAS 161. Management is currently
evaluating the enhanced disclosure requirements and the impact on our consolidated financial
statements of adopting FAS 161.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value
of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. FSP No. 157-3 clarifies the
application of FAS No. 157 in a market that is not active. More specifically, FSP No. 157-3 states
that significant judgment should be applied to determine if observable data in a dislocated market
represents forced
F-18
liquidations or distressed sales and are not representative of fair value in an orderly
transaction. FSP No. 157-3 also provides further guidance that the use of a reporting entitys own
assumptions about future cash flows and appropriately risk-adjusted discount rates is acceptable
when relevant observable inputs are not available. In addition, FSP No. 157-3 provides guidance on
the level of reliance of broker quotes or pricing services when measuring fair value in a non
active market stating that less reliance should be placed on a quote that does not reflect actual
market transactions and a quote that is not a binding offer. The guidance in FSP No. 157-3 is
effective upon issuance for all financial statements that have not been issued and any changes in
valuation techniques as a result of applying FSP No. 157-3 are accounted for as a change in
accounting estimate.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 provides additional guidance
for estimating fair value under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements when there is an inactive market or the market is not orderly. This FSP is effective
for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2), amends current
other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more
operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on
debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP does not amend existing
recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. The provisions of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 are effective for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009.
Note 3. Investments
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(FAS 157) as of March 1, 2008, which among other matters, requires enhanced disclosures about
investments that are measured and reported at fair value. As defined in FAS 157, fair value is the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FAS 157 establishes a hierarchal
disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in
measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors,
including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments
with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively
quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree
of judgment used in measuring fair value.
Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques the Company is required
to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value
hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values.
Investments carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three
categories:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuations based on inputs other than quoted prices in active markets, which
are either directly or indirectly observable. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the
overall fair value measurement. The inputs into the determination of fair value may require
significant management judgment or estimation. Even if observable-market data is available,
such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes which
include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual
transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by
disclaimer would result in classification as Level III information, assuming no additional
corroborating evidence. |
In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, we continue to employ the valuation
policy approved by our board of directors that is consistent with FAS 157 (see Note 2). Consistent
with our valuation policy, we evaluate the source of inputs, including any markets in which our
investments are trading, in determining fair value.
F-19
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments as of February 28, 2009
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Non-control/non-affiliate
investments
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$ |
96,463 |
|
|
$ |
96,463 |
|
Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,439 |
|
|
|
22,439 |
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments
that use Level 3 inputs for the year ended February 28, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Balance as of February 29, 2008 |
|
$ |
172,837 |
|
Net unrealized losses |
|
|
(27,961 |
) |
Purchases and other adjustments to cost |
|
|
23,230 |
|
Sales and redemptions |
|
|
(49,194 |
) |
Net transfers in and/or out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
Purchases and other adjustments to cost include new investments at cost, effects of
refinancing/restructuring, accretion income from discount on debt securities, and PIK.
Sale and redemptions represent net proceeds received and realized gains and losses from investments
sold during the period.
Net transfers in and/or out represent existing investments that were either previously categorized
as a higher level and the inputs to the model became unobservable or investments that were
previously classified as the lowest significant input became observable during the period. These
investments are recorded at their end of period fair values.
The composition of our investments as of February 28, 2009, at amortized cost and fair value were
as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
at Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
First lien term loans |
|
$ |
24,901 |
|
|
$ |
17,117 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
Second lien term loans |
|
|
57,558 |
|
|
|
41,043 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
Senior secured notes |
|
|
35,780 |
|
|
|
25,832 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
Unsecured notes |
|
|
18,782 |
|
|
|
12,381 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Structured Finance Securities |
|
|
29,905 |
|
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Equity/limited partnership interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
166,926 |
|
|
$ |
118,912 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
The composition of our investments as of February 29, 2008, at amortized cost and fair value were
as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
at Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
First lien term loans |
|
$ |
29,660 |
|
|
$ |
26,362 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
Second lien term loans |
|
|
70,819 |
|
|
|
62,446 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
Senior secured notes |
|
|
35,024 |
|
|
|
31,657 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
Unsecured notes |
|
|
27,386 |
|
|
|
23,281 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Structured Finance Securities |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
28,915 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
Equity/limited partnership interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
192,889 |
|
|
$ |
172,837 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
F-20
Note 4. Investment in GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd.
On January 22, 2008, we invested $30 million in all of the outstanding subordinated notes of GSC
Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd., (the GSCIC CLO), a $400 million CLO managed by us that invests
primarily in senior secured loans. Additionally, we entered into a collateral management agreement
with GSCIC CLO pursuant to which we will act as collateral manager to it. In return for our
collateral management services, we are entitled to a senior collateral management fee of 0.10% and
a subordinate collateral management fee of 0.40% of the outstanding principal amount of GSCIC CLOs
assets, to be paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an
incentive management fee equal to 20% of excess cash flow to the extent the GSCIC CLO subordinated
notes receive an internal rate of return equal to or greater than 12%. For the years ended February
28, 2009 and February 29, 2008, we accrued $2.0 and $0.6 million in management fees and $4.4 and
$0.3 million in interest income, respectively. We did not accrue any amounts related to the
incentive management fee as the 12% hurdle rate has not yet been achieved.
Note 5. Income Taxes
The Company intends to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code
and, as such, will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of taxable income and gains
distributed to stockholders.
The Company owns 100% of GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd. (CLO), an Exempted Company
incorporated in the Cayman Islands. For financial reporting purposes, the CLO is not included as
part of the consolidated financial statements. For federal income tax purposes, the Company has
requested and received approval from the Internal Revenue Service to treat the CLO as a disregarded
entity. As such, for federal income tax purposes and for purposes of meeting the RIC qualification
and diversification tests, the results of operations of the CLO are included with those of the
Company.
To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required to meet certain income and asset diversification tests
in addition to distributing at least 90% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by
the Code. Because federal income tax regulations differ from accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net
investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences may
be permanent or temporary in nature. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts
in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Differences in classification may also
result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes. During the year
ended February 28, 2009, the Company reclassified for book purposes amounts arising from permanent
book/tax differences primarily related to nondeductible excise tax
and meals & entertainment, market discount, interest income with
respect to the CLO which is consolidated for tax purposes, and the tax
character of distributions as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) |
|
$ |
381 |
|
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
(1,106 |
) |
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
725 |
|
For income tax purposes, distributions paid to shareholders are reported as ordinary income, return
of capital, long term capital gains or a combination thereof. The tax character of distributions
paid for the year ended February 28, 2009 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income (a) |
|
$ |
8,540 |
|
Capital gains |
|
|
|
|
Return of capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reported on tax Form 1099-DIV |
|
$ |
8,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Ordinary income is reported on Form 1099-DIV as non-qualified.
For federal income tax purposes, the cost of investments owned at February 28, 2009 was $526.3
million.
At February 28, 2009, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis as detailed below
differ from the amounts reflected per the Companys Statement of Assets and Liabilities by
temporary book/tax differences primarily arising from the consolidation of the CLO for tax
purposes, market discount and original issue discount income and amortization of organizational
expenditures (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated capital gains/(losses) |
|
$ |
(3,195 |
) |
Other temporary differences |
|
|
(119 |
) |
Undistributed ordinary income |
|
|
6,312 |
|
Unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(146,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Components of distributable earnings |
|
$ |
(143,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The
Company has incurred capital losses of $3.2 million for the year
ended February 28, 2009. Such capital losses will be available to
offset future capital gains if any and if unused, will expire on
February 28, 2017.
Management
has analyzed the Companys tax positions taken on federal income
tax returns for all open tax years (fiscal years 2008-2009), and has
concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the
Companys financial statements.
F-21
Note 6. Agreements
On March 21, 2007, the Company entered into an investment advisory and management agreement (the
Management Agreement) with GSC Group. The initial term of the Management Agreement is two years,
with automatic, one-year renewals at the end of each year subject to certain approvals by our board
of directors and/or our stockholders. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, our investment adviser
implements our business strategy on a day-to-day basis and performs certain services for us,
subject to oversight by our board of directors. Our investment adviser is responsible for, among
other duties, determining investment criteria, sourcing, analyzing and executing investments
transactions, asset sales, financings and performing asset management duties. Under the Management
Agreement, we have agreed to pay our investment adviser a management fee for investment advisory
and management services consisting of a base management fee and an incentive fee.
The base management fee of 1.75% is calculated based on the average value of our total assets
(other than cash or cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) at the end
of the two most recently completed fiscal quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any share
issuances or repurchases during the applicable fiscal quarter.
The incentive fee consists of the following two parts:
The first, payable quarterly in arrears, equals 20% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income
(not including excise taxes), expressed as a rate of return on the value of the net assets at the
end of the immediately preceding quarter, that exceeds a 1.875% quarterly (7.5% annualized) hurdle
rate measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. Under this provision, in any fiscal quarter,
our investment adviser receives no incentive fee unless our pre-incentive fee net investment
income, as defined above, exceeds the hurdle rate of 1.875%. Amounts received as a return of
capital are not included in calculating this portion of the incentive fee. Since the hurdle rate is
based on net assets, a return of less than the hurdle rate on total assets may still result in an
incentive fee.
The second, payable at the end of each fiscal year equals 20% of our net realized capital gains, if
any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation, in each case
on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of such incentive fees paid to the investment
adviser through such date.
We will defer cash payment of any incentive fee otherwise earned by our investment adviser if,
during the most recent four full fiscal quarter period ending on or prior to the date such payment
is to be made, the sum of (a) our aggregate distributions to our stockholders and (b) our change in
net assets (defined as total assets less liabilities) (before taking into account any incentive
fees payable during that period) is less than 7.5% of our net assets at the beginning of such
period. These calculations will be appropriately pro rated for the first three fiscal quarters of
operation and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the applicable period. Such
incentive fee will become payable on the next date on which such test has been satisfied for the
most recent four full fiscal quarters or upon certain terminations of
the investment advisory and management agreement.
For the years ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008, we incurred $2.7 and $2.9 million in
base management fees and $1.8 and $0.7 million in incentive fees related to pre-incentive fee net
investment income, respectively. For the years ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008, we
incurred no incentive management fees related to net realized capital gains. As of February 28,
2009, $0.6 million of base management fees and $2.3 million of incentive fees were unpaid and
included in management and incentive fees payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
As of February 28, 2009, the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the sum of our
aggregate distributions to our stockholders and our change in net assets (defined as total assets
less liabilities) (before taking into account any incentive fees payable during that period) was
less than 7.5% of our net assets at the beginning of the fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2008.
Accordingly, the payment of the incentive fee for the quarter ended February 28, 2009 will be
deferred. The total deferred incentive fee payable at February 28, 2009 is $2.3 million.
On March 21, 2007, the Company entered into a separate administration agreement (the
Administration Agreement) with GSC Group, pursuant to which GSC Group, as our administrator, has
agreed to furnish us with the facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our
day-to-day operations and provide managerial assistance on our behalf to those portfolio companies
to which we are required to provide such assistance. Our allocable portion is based on the
proportion that our total assets bears to the total assets or a subset of total assets administered
by our administrator.
For the years ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008, we expensed $1.0 and $0.9 million of
administrator expenses, respectively, pertaining to bookkeeping, record keeping and other
administrative services provided to the Company in addition to our allocable portion of rent and
other overhead related expenses. GSC Group has agreed not to be reimbursed by the Company for any
expenses incurred in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement until the
Companys total assets exceeds $500 million. Additionally, the Companys requirement to reimburse
GSC Group is capped such that the amounts payable, together with the Companys other operating
expenses, will not exceed an amount equal to 1.5% per annum of the Companys net assets
attributable to the Companys common stock. Accordingly, for the years ended February 28, 2009 and
February 29, 2008, we have recorded $1.0 and $1.8 million in expense waiver and reimbursement,
respectively, under the Administration Agreement in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations.
F-22
On March 23, 2007, the Manager provided the Company with a Notification of Fee Reimbursement (the
Expense Reimbursement Agreement). The Expense Reimbursement Agreement provides for the Manager to
reimburse the Company for operating expenses to the extent that our total annual operating expenses
(other than investment advisory and management fees, interest and credit facility expenses, and
organizational expense) exceed an amount equal to 1.55% of our net assets attributable to common
stock. The Manager is not entitled to recover any reimbursements under this agreement in future
periods. The term of the Expense Reimbursement Agreement is for a period of 12 months beginning
March 23, 2007 and for each twelve months period thereafter unless otherwise agreed by the Manager
and the Company. For the year ended February 28, 2009, we have recorded $49,715 in expense waiver
and reimbursement under the Expense Reimbursement Agreement in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations. On April 15, 2008, the Manager and the Company agreed not to extend the
agreement for an additional twelve month period and terminated the Expense Reimbursement Agreement
as of March 23, 2008.
Note 7. Borrowings
As a BDC, we are only allowed to employ leverage to the extent that our asset coverage, as defined
in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after giving effect to such leverage. The amount of leverage
that we employ at any time depends on our assessment of the market and other factors at the time of
any proposed borrowing.
On April 11, 2007, we formed GSC Investment Funding LLC (GSC Funding), a wholly owned
consolidated subsidiary of the Company, through which we entered into a revolving securitized
credit facility (the Revolving Facility) with Deutsche Bank AG, as administrative agent, under
which we may borrow up to $100 million. A significant percentage of our total assets have been
pledged under the Revolving Facility to secure our obligations thereunder. Under the Revolving
Facility, funds are borrowed from or through certain lenders at prevailing commercial paper rates
or, if the commercial paper market is at any time unavailable, at prevailing LIBOR rates, plus
0.70% payable monthly. As of February 28, 2009, there was $59.0 million outstanding under the
Revolving Facility and the Company continues to be in compliance with all of the limitations and
requirements of the Revolving Facility. As of February 29, 2008, there was $78.5 million
outstanding under the Revolving Facility. For the years ended February 28, 2009 and February 29,
2008, we recorded $2.4 and $4.0 million of interest expense and $193,464 and $155,946 of
amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Revolving Facility, respectively, and the
interest rates on the outstanding borrowings ranged from 1.51% to 4.99%.
On May 1, 2007, we formed GSC Investment Funding II LLC (GSC Funding II), a wholly owned
consolidated subsidiary of the Company, through which we entered into a $25.7 million term
securitized credit facility (the Term Facility and, together with the Revolving Facility, the
Facilities) with Deutsche Bank AG, as administrative agent, which was fully drawn at closing. A
significant percentage of our total assets were pledged under the Term Facility to secure our
obligations thereunder. The Term Facility bears interest at prevailing commercial paper rates or,
if the commercial paper market is at any time unavailable, at prevailing LIBOR rates, plus 0.70%,
payable quarterly. For the year ended February 29, 2008, we recorded $0.6 million of interest
expense and $0.3 of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Term Facility.
Each of the Facilities contain limitations as to how borrowed funds may be used, such as
restrictions on industry concentrations, asset size, payment frequency and status, average life,
collateral interests and investment ratings. The Facilities also include certain requirements
relating to portfolio performance the violation of which could result in the early amortization of
the Facilities, limit further advances (in the case of the Revolving Facility) and, in some cases,
result in an event of default, allowing the lenders to accelerate repayment of amounts owed
thereunder.
On December 12, 2007, the Company consolidated its Facilities by using the proceeds of a draw under
the Revolving Facility to repay and terminate the Term Facility and transferring all assets in GSC
Funding II to GSC Funding. The Companys aggregate indebtedness and cost of funding were unchanged
as a result of this consolidation.
In March 2009 we amended the Revolving Credit Facility to increases the portion of the
portfolio that can be invested in CCC rated investments in return for an increased interest rate
and expedited amortization. As a result of these transactions, we expect to have additional
cushion under our Borrowing Base (as defined below) that will allow us to better manage our capital
in times of declining asset prices and market dislocation. If we are not able to obtain new sources
of financing, however, we expect our portfolio will gradually de-lever as principal payments are
received, which may negatively impact our net investment income and ability to pay dividends.
At February 28, 2009, we had $59.0 million in borrowings under the Revolving Facility. At February
29, 2008, we had $78.5 million in borrowings under the Revolving Facility and $21.5 million of
undrawn commitments remaining. The actual amount that may be outstanding at any given time (the
Borrowing Base) is dependent upon the amount and quality of the collateral securing the Revolving
Facility. Our Borrowing Base was $59.9 million at February 28, 2009 versus $83.6 million at
February 29, 2008. The decline in our Borrowing Base during this period is mainly attributable to
the decline in the value of the pledged collateral and the downgrade of certain public ratings or
private credit estimates of the pledged collateral.
F-23
For purposes of determining the Borrowing Base, most assets are assigned the values set forth in
our most recent quarterly report filed with the SEC. Accordingly, the February 28, 2009 Borrowing
Base relies upon the valuations set forth in the quarterly report for the quarter ended November
30, 2008. The valuations presented in this annual report will not be incorporated into the
Borrowing Base until after this report is filed with the SEC.
A Borrowing Base violation will occur if our outstanding borrowings exceed the Borrowing Base at
any time. We can cure a Borrowing Base violation by reducing our borrowing below the Borrowing Base
(by, e.g., selling collateral and repaying borrowings) or pledging additional collateral to
increase the Borrowing Base. If we fail to cure a Borrowing Base violation within the specified
time, a default under the Revolving Facility shall occur.
Note 8. Interest Rate Cap Agreements
In April and May 2007, pursuant to the requirements of the Facilities, GSC Funding and GSC Funding
II entered into interest rate cap agreements with Deutsche Bank AG with notional amounts of $34
million and $60.9 million at costs of $75,000, and $44,000, respectively. In May 2007 GSC Funding
increased the notional under its agreement from $34 million to $40 million for an additional cost
of $12,000. The agreements expire in February 2014 and November 2013 respectively. These interest
rate caps are treated as free-standing derivatives under FAS 133 and are presented at their fair
value on the consolidated balance sheet and changes in their fair value are included on the
consolidated statement of operations.
The agreements provide for a payment to the Company in the event LIBOR exceeds 8%, mitigating our
exposure to increases in LIBOR. With respect to calculating the payments under these agreements,
the notional amount is determined based on a pre-determined schedule set forth in the respective
agreements which provides for a reduction in the notional at specified dates until the maturity of
the agreements. As of February 28, 2009 we did not receive any such payments as the LIBOR has not
exceeded 8%. At February 28, 2009, the total notional outstanding for the interest rate caps was
$66.4 million with an aggregate fair value of $0.04 million, which is recorded in outstanding
interest cap at fair value on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended
February, 28, 2009, the Company recorded $0.04 million of unrealized depreciation on derivatives in
the consolidated statement of operations related to the change in the fair value of the interest
rate cap agreements.
The table below summarizes our interest rate cap agreements as of February 28, 2009 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
Instrument |
|
Type |
|
Notional |
|
Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
Fair Value |
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Free Standing Derivative |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
Feb 2014 |
|
$ |
28 |
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Free Standing Derivative |
|
|
26,433 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
Nov 2013 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
The table below summarizes our interest rate cap agreements as of February 29, 2008 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
Instrument |
|
Type |
|
Notional |
|
Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
Fair Value |
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Free Standing Derivative |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
Feb 2014 |
|
$ |
51 |
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Free Standing Derivative |
|
|
46,637 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
Nov 2013 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77 |
Note 9. Directors Fees
The independent directors receive an annual fee of $40,000. They also receive $2,500 plus
reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board
meeting and receive $1,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with attending each committee meeting. In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee
receives an annual fee of $5,000 and the chairman of each other committee receives an annual fee of
$2,000 for their additional services in these capacities. In addition, we have purchased directors
and officers liability insurance on behalf of our directors and officers. Independent directors
have the option to receive their directors fees in the form of our common stock issued at a price
per share equal to the greater of net asset value or the market price at the time of payment. No
compensation is paid to directors who are interested persons. For the year ended February 28,
2009 we accrued $0.3 million for directors fees expense and $18,017 for reimbursement of
out-of-pocket expenses. As of February 28, 2009, $5,250 in directors fees expense was unpaid and
included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet. As of February
28, 2009, we had not issued any common stock to our directors as compensation for their services.
F-24
Note 10. Stockholders Equity
On May 16, 2006, GSC Group capitalized the LLC, by contributing $1,000 in exchange for 67 shares,
constituting all of the issued and outstanding shares of the LLC.
On March 20, 2007, the Company issued 959,955 and 81,362 shares of common stock, priced at $15.00
per share, to GSC Group and certain individual employees of GSC Group, respectively, in exchange
for the general partnership interest and a limited partnership interest in GSC Partners CDO III GP,
LP, collectively valued at $15.6 million. At this time, the 67 shares owned by GSC Group in the LLC
were exchanged for 67 shares of GSC Investment Corp.
On March 28, 2007, the Company completed its IPO of 7,250,000 shares of common stock, priced at
$15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts and commissions. Total proceeds received from the
IPO, net of $7.1 million in underwriters discount and commissions, and $1.0 million in offering
costs, were $100.7 million.
Note 11. Earnings Per Share
The following information sets forth the computation of the weighted average basic and diluted net
decrease in net assets per share from operations for the years ended February 28, 2009, and
February 29, 2008 (dollars in thousands except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
February 29, 2008 |
Basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations |
|
$ |
(21,315 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,451 |
) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
8,291,384 |
|
|
|
7,761,965 |
|
Earnings per common share-basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(2.57 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
Note 12. Dividend
The following table summarizes dividends declared during the years ended February 28, 2009 and
February 29, 2008 (dollars in thousands except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Declared |
|
Record Date |
|
Payment Date |
|
Amount Per
Share * |
|
Total Amount |
|
May 22, 2008 |
|
May 30, 2008 |
|
June 13, 2008 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
3,234 |
|
August 19, 2008 |
|
August 29, 2008 |
|
September 15, 2008 |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
December 8, 2008 |
|
December 18, 2008 |
|
December 29, 2008 |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
8,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Per |
|
|
Date Declared |
|
Record Date |
|
Payment Date |
|
Share * |
|
Total Amount |
|
May 21, 2007 |
|
May 29, 2007 |
|
June 6, 2007 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1,990 |
|
August 14, 2007 |
|
August 24, 2007 |
|
August 31, 2007 |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
2,985 |
|
November 15, 2007 |
|
November 30, 2007 |
|
December 3, 2007 |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
3,151 |
|
December 28, 2007 |
|
January 18, 2008 |
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
February 20, 2008 |
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
March 10, 2008 |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
12,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Amount per share is calculated based on the number of shares outstanding at the date of
declaration. |
F-25
Note 13. Financial Highlights
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the years ended February 28, 2009 and
February 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
February 29, 2008 |
Per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public offering cost at IPO, March 23, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
Sales load |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.85 |
) |
Offering cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period/IPO |
|
|
11.80 |
|
|
|
14.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (1) |
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
Net realized gains (losses) on investments and derivatives |
|
|
(0.86 |
) |
|
|
0.47 |
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and derivatives |
|
|
(3.38 |
) |
|
|
(2.45) |
* |
|
|
|
Net decrease in stockholders equity |
|
|
(2.57 |
) |
|
|
(0.68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared from net investment income |
|
|
(1.03 |
) |
|
|
(1.37 |
) |
Distributions declared from net realized capital gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to stockholders |
|
|
(1.03 |
) |
|
|
(1.55 |
) |
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period |
|
$ |
8.20 |
|
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period |
|
$ |
68,013,777 |
|
|
$ |
97,869,040 |
|
Shares outstanding at end of period |
|
|
8,291,384 |
|
|
|
8,291,384 |
|
|
Per share market value at end of period |
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
$ |
11.04 |
|
Total return based on market value (2) |
|
|
(72.64 |
)% |
|
|
(16.07 |
)% |
Total return based on net asset value (3) |
|
|
(21.78 |
)% |
|
|
(11.00 |
)% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and derivatives per share amount includes the net
loss incurred prior to the IPO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio/Supplemental data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (4) |
|
|
15.19 |
% |
|
|
8.11 |
% |
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets (4) |
|
|
7.12 |
% |
|
|
5.91 |
% |
Ratio of incentive management fees to average net assets |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
Ratio of credit facility related expenses to average net assets |
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
4.51 |
% |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets (4) |
|
|
12.23 |
% |
|
|
11.05 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net investment income excluding expense waiver and reimbursement equals $1.55 and $1.08 per
share for the years ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
For the year ended February 28, 2009, the total return based on market value equals the
decrease in market value at February 28, 2009, of $9.05 per share over the price per share at
February 29, 2008, of $11.04, plus the declared dividend of $0.39 per share for stockholders
of record on May 30, 2008, the declared dividend of $0.39 per share for stockholders of record
on August 29, 2008, and the declared dividend of $0.25 per share for stockholders of record on
December 29, 2008, divided by the February 29, 2008 price per share. For the year ended
February 29, 2008, the total return based on market value equals the decrease in market value
at February 29, 2008 of $3.96 per share over the IPO offering price per share at March 23,
2007 of $15.00, plus the declared dividend of $0.24 per share for stockholders of record on
May 29, 2007, the declared dividend of $0.36 per share for stockholders of record on August
24, 2007, the declared dividend of $0.38 per share for stockholders of record on November 30,
2007, the declared dividend of $0.18 per share for stockholders of record on January 28, 2008,
and the declared dividend of $0.39 per share for stockholders of record on March 10, 2008,
divided by the IPO offering price per share. Total return based on market value is not
annualized. |
|
(3) |
|
For the year ended February 28, 2009, the total return based on net asset value equals the
change in net asset value during the period plus the declared dividend of $0.39 per share for
stockholders of record on May 30, 2008, the declared dividend of $0.39 per share for
stockholders of record on August 29, 2008, and the declared dividend of $0.25 per share for
stockholders of record on December 29, 2008, divided by the beginning net asset value during
the period. For the year ended February 29, 2008, the total return based on net asset value
equals the change in net asset value during the period plus the declared dividend of $0.24 per
share for stockholders of record on May 29, 2007, the declared dividend of $0.36 per share for
stockholders of record on August 24, 2007, the declared dividend of $0.38 per share for
stockholders of record on November 30, 2007, the declared dividend of $0.18 per share for
stockholders of record on January 28, 2008, and the declared dividend of $0.39 per share for
stockholders of record on March 10, 2008,divided by the beginning net asset value during the
period. Total return based on net asset value is not annualized. |
|
(4) |
|
For the year ended February 28, 2009, incorporating the expense waiver and reimbursement
arrangement, the ratio of net investment income, operating expenses, total expenses to average
net assets is 16.21%, 5.94%, and 11.04%, respectively. For the year ended |
F-26
|
|
|
|
|
February 29, 2008, incorporating the expense waiver and reimbursement arrangement, the ratio of net investment
income, operating expenses, total expenses to average net assets is 9.63%, 4.31%, and 9.45%. |
Note 14. Related Party Transaction
On March 20, 2007, the Company issued 959,955 and 81,362 shares of common stock, priced at $15.00
per share, to GSC Group and certain individual employees of GSC Group, respectively, in exchange
for the general partnership interest and a limited partnership interest in GSC Partners CDO III GP,
LP, collectively valued at $15.6 million. Additionally, GSC Group assigned its rights to act as
collateral manager for GSC Partners CDO Fund III, Limited (CDO III) to the Company. The Company
paid GSC Group $0.1 million to acquire the rights to act as collateral manager and expected to
receive collateral management fees of $0.2 million. For the year ended February 29, 2008 we
received $0.4 million of management fee income from CDO III and received distributions of $16.1
million from our partnership interests resulting in a realized gain of $0.5 million. As of February
28, 2009, the fair value of the general partnership interest and limited partnership interest is
$108,939.
On January 10, 2008, GSC Group notified our Dividend Reinvestment Plan Administrator that it was
electing to receive dividends and other distributions in cash (rather than in additional shares of
common stock) with respect to all shares of stock held by it and the investment funds under its
control. For the year ended February 29, 2008, GSC Group received 35,911 of additional shares under
the dividend reinvestment plan. As of February 28, 2009, GSC Group and its affiliates own
approximately 12% of the outstanding common shares of the Company.
On January 22, 2008, we entered into a collateral management agreement with GSCIC CLO pursuant to
which we will act as collateral manager to it. In return for our collateral management services,
we are entitled to a senior collateral management fee of 0.10% and a subordinate collateral
management fee of 0.40% of the outstanding principal amount of GSCIC CLOs assets, to be paid
quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee
equal to 20% of excess cash flow to the extent the GSCIC CLO subordinated notes receive an internal
rate of return equal to or greater than 12%. We do not expect to enter into additional collateral
management agreements in the near future.
In April 2009, our investment adviser withheld a scheduled principal amortization payment under its
credit facility, resulting in a default thereunder. Our investment adviser has initiated
discussions with its secured lenders regarding a consensual restructuring of its obligations under
such credit facility. While we are not directly affected by our investment advisers default, if it
is unable to restructure its credit facility, or an acceleration of the outstanding principal
balance by the lenders occurs, the ability of the investment adviser to retain key individuals and
perform its investment advisory duties for us could be significantly impaired.
Note 15. Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Qtr 4 |
|
Qtr 3 |
|
Qtr 2 |
|
Qtr 1 |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share numbers) |
Interest and related portfolio income |
|
$ |
5,480 |
|
|
$ |
6,361 |
|
|
$ |
5,835 |
|
|
$ |
5,715 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
3,288 |
|
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
3,195 |
|
Net realized and unrealized loss |
|
|
(17,296 |
) |
|
|
(11,438 |
) |
|
|
(6,023 |
) |
|
|
(384 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting
from operations |
|
|
(14,008 |
) |
|
|
(7,551 |
) |
|
|
(2,567 |
) |
|
|
2,811 |
|
Net investment income per common share at end
of each quarter |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
Net realized and unrealized loss per common
share at end of each quarter |
|
$ |
(2.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
Net asset value per common share |
|
$ |
8.20 |
|
|
$ |
10.14 |
|
|
$ |
11.05 |
|
|
$ |
11.75 |
|
F-27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Qtr 4 |
|
Qtr 3 |
|
Qtr 2 |
|
Qtr 1 |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share numbers) |
Interest and related portfolio income |
|
$ |
5,520 |
|
|
$ |
5,882 |
|
|
$ |
5,882 |
|
|
$ |
4,102 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(11,972 |
) |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
(3,939 |
) |
|
|
1,722 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting
from operations |
|
|
(9,410 |
) |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
3,680 |
|
Net investment income per common share at end
of each quarter |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) per
common share at end of each quarter |
|
$ |
(1.46 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Net asset value per common share |
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
|
$ |
13.51 |
|
|
$ |
13.76 |
|
|
$ |
14.21 |
|
Note 16. Subsequent Events
Following the end of the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, AbitibiBowater Inc. and certain of
its subsidiaries, which includes the Companys $2.1 million
investment in Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada (Abitibi), filed
voluntary petitions on April 16, 2009 in the United States under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code and sought creditor protection under the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act in
Canada.
F-28
EX-31.1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
I, Seth M. Katzenstein, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GSC Investment Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the companys most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit
committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 21, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Seth M. Katzenstein
|
|
|
Seth M. Katzenstein |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
EX-31.2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
I, Richard T. Allorto, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GSC Investment Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the companys most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit
committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 21, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard T. Allorto, Jr.
|
|
|
Name: |
Richard T. Allorto, Jr. |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
EX-32.1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the accompanying
Annual Report of GSC Investment Corp. on Form 10-K (the Report) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
Seth M. Katzenstein, the Chief Executive Officer and President and Richard T. Allorto, Jr.,
the Chief Financial Officer of GSC Investment Corp., each certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:
|
1. |
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Exchange Act; and |
|
|
2. |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GSC Investment Corp. |
Date: May 21, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Seth M. Katzenstein
|
|
|
Name: |
Seth M. Katzenstein |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard T. Allorto, Jr.
|
|
|
Name: |
Richard T. Allorto, Jr. |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|