As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2017
Securities Act File No. 333-216344
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-2
(Check appropriate box or boxes)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
☒ Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1
☐ Post-Effective Amendment No.
SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
535 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(212) 906-7800
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Christian L. Oberbeck
Chief Executive Officer
Saratoga Investment Corp.
535 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
COPIES TO:
Steven B. Boehm, Esq.
Harry S. Pangas, Esq.
Payam Siadatpour, Esq.
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
700 Sixth Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
Tel: (202) 383-0100
Fax: (202) 637-3593
Approximate date of proposed public offering:
From time to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are offered on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan, check the following box. ☒
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):
☐ When declared effective pursuant to Section 8(c).
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
| ||||
Title of Securities Being Registered |
Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1) |
Amount of Registration Fee(7) | ||
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share(2)(3) |
||||
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share(2) |
||||
Subscription Rights(2) |
||||
Debt Securities(4) |
||||
Warrants(5) |
||||
Total(6) |
$70,000,000 | $8,113 | ||
|
(1) | Estimated pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933 solely for the purpose of determining the registration fee. The proposed maximum offering price per security will be determined, from time to time, by the Registrant in connection with the sale by the Registrant of the securities registered under this Registration Statement. In reliance upon Rule 429 under the Securities Act of 1933, this amount is comprised of the amount previously registered by the Registrant under a registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-215611). All amounts unsold under the prospectus contained in such prior Registration Statement (a total of $50,000,000) are carried forward into this Registration Statement, and the prospectus contained as a part of this Registration Statement shall be deemed to be combined with the prospectus contained in the above-referenced registration statement, which has previously been filed. |
(2) | Subject to Note 6 below, there is being registered hereunder an indeterminate number of shares of common stock, preferred stock, subscription rights to purchase shares of common stock or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock, as may be sold, from time to time. |
(3) | Subject to Note 6 below, includes such indeterminate number of shares of common stock as may, from time to time, be issued upon conversion or exchange of other securities registered hereunder, to the extent any such securities are, by their terms, convertible or exchangeable for common stock. |
(4) | Subject to Note 6 below, there is being registered hereunder an indeterminate number of debt securities as may be sold, from time to time. If any debt securities are issued at an original issue discount, then the offering price shall be in such greater principal amount as shall result in an aggregate price to investors not to exceed $70,000,000. |
(5) | Subject to Note 6 below, there is being registered hereunder an indeterminate number of warrants as may be sold, from time to time. |
(6) | In no event will the aggregate offering price of all securities issued from time to time pursuant to this Registration Statement exceed $70,000,000. |
(7) | $5,795 of this amount was previously paid. We have previously paid for the registration of $50,000,000 of securities and are paying an additional $2,318 herewith in connection with the registration of an additional $20,000,000 of securities. Once this Registration Statement on Form N-2 is declared effective, any offering contemplated under the registrants prior Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-215611) will terminate. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MARCH 10, 2017
$70,000,000
Common Stock
Preferred Stock
Subscription Rights
Debt Securities
Warrants
We are a specialty finance company that invests primarily in leveraged loans and mezzanine debt issued by private U.S. middle-market companies, both through direct lending and through participation in loan syndicates. Our investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation from our investments.
We are externally managed and advised by Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, a New York-based investment firm affiliated with Saratoga Partners, a middle market private equity investment firm.
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, up to $70,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, subscription rights to purchase shares of our common stock, debt securities, and warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities, which we refer to, collectively, as our securities. The preferred stock, subscription rights, warrants and debt securities offered hereby may be convertible or exchangeable into shares of our common stock. The securities may be offered at prices and on terms to be described in one or more supplements to this prospectus.
Absent approval by the majority of our common stockholders, the offering price per share of our common stock less any underwriting commissions or discounts will not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at the time we make the offering unless we issue shares in connection with a rights offering to our existing stockholders or under such other circumstances as the SEC may permit. We do not currently have stockholder approval of issuances below net asset value. In addition, we cannot issue shares of our common stock below net asset value unless our Board of Directors determines that it would be in our and our stockholders best interests to do so. Sales of common stock at prices below net asset value per share dilute the interests of existing stockholders, have the effect of reducing our net asset value per share and may reduce our market price per share. In addition, continuous sales of common stock below net asset value may have a negative impact on total returns and could have a negative impact on the market price of our shares of common stock. See Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value.
Our securities may be offered directly to one or more purchasers, or through agents designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus supplement relating to an offering will identify any agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our securities, and will disclose any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may not sell any of our securities through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of this prospectus and a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of such securities.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol SAR. On March 9, 2017, the last reported sales price on the NYSE for our common stock was $23.27 per share. We are required to determine the net asset value per share of our common stock on a quarterly basis. Our net asset value per share of our common stock as of November 30, 2016 was $22.21.
Substantially all of the debt investments held in our portfolio hold a non-investment grade rating by one or more rating agencies (which non-investment grade debt is commonly referred to as high yield and junk debt) or, if not rated, would be rated below investment grade or junk if rated. A majority of our debt portfolio consists of debt securities for which issuers were not required to make principal payments until the maturity of such debt securities, which could result in a substantial loss to us if such issuers are unable to refinance or repay their debt at maturity. A substantial amount of our subordinated debt and preferred equity investments pay payment-in-kind interest, which creates negative amortization on a loan, resulting in an increase in the amounts that our portfolio companies will ultimately be required to pay us. In addition, a majority of our debt investments had variable interest rates that reset periodically based on benchmarks such as LIBOR and the prime rate. As a result, significant increases in such benchmarks in the future may make it more difficult for these borrowers to service their obligations under the debt investments that we hold.
This prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement contain important information about us that a prospective investor should know before investing in our securities, and will collectively constitute the prospectus for each offering of our securities hereunder. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information about us with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This information is available free of charge by contacting us at 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022, by telephone at (212) 906-7800, or on our website at http://www.saratogainvestmentcorp.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus or any accompanying prospectus supplement, and you should not consider that information to be part of either. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains such information.
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk and should be considered speculative. For more information regarding the risks you should consider, including the risk of leverage, please see Risk Factors beginning on page 22 of this prospectus. For example, our investment in the subordinated notes of one collateralized loan obligation fund, Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd., represents a first loss position in a portfolio that is composed predominantly of senior secured first lien term loans. A first loss position means that we will suffer the first economic losses if losses are incurred on loans held by the collateralized loan obligation fund or losses are otherwise incurred by the collateralized loan obligation fund, including its incurrence of operating expenses in excess of its operating income.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of securities unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.
The date of this prospectus is , 2017
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to provide you with different information or to make representations as to matters not stated in this prospectus. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. This prospectus is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities by any person in any jurisdiction where it is unlawful for that person to make such an offer or solicitation or to any person in any jurisdiction to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation. The information in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, and under no circumstances should the delivery of this prospectus or the sale of any securities imply that the information in this prospectus is accurate as of any later date or that the affairs of Saratoga Investment Corp., have not changed since the date hereof or thereof. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospectus may have changed since then. We will update the information in this prospectus to reflect material changes only as required by law.
Page | ||||
1 | ||||
12 | ||||
16 | ||||
19 | ||||
22 | ||||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 | ||||
49 | ||||
54 | ||||
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
56 | |||
88 | ||||
90 | ||||
103 | ||||
107 | ||||
114 | ||||
123 | ||||
124 | ||||
124 | ||||
127 | ||||
133 | ||||
140 | ||||
143 | ||||
148 | ||||
154 | ||||
156 | ||||
170 | ||||
172 | ||||
174 | ||||
174 | ||||
174 | ||||
174 | ||||
174 | ||||
175 | ||||
F-1 | ||||
S-1 |
This summary highlights some of the information in this prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should read carefully the more detailed information set forth under Risk Factors and the other information included in this prospectus. Unless otherwise noted, the terms we, us, our, the Company and Saratoga refer to Saratoga Investment Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Saratoga Investment Funding LLC and Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC LP, and does not refer to Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1 Ltd. In addition, the terms Saratoga Investment Advisors and investment adviser refer to Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, our external investment adviser.
Overview
We are a specialty finance company that invests primarily in leveraged loans and mezzanine debt issued by private U.S. middle-market companies, which we define as companies having annual EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of between $2 million and $50 million, both through direct lending and through participation in loan syndicates. Our investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation from our investments. We are externally managed and advised by Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, a New York-based investment firm affiliated with Saratoga Partners, a middle market private equity investment firm.
Our portfolio is comprised primarily of investments in leveraged loans (both first and second lien term loans) issued by middle market companies. Term loans are loans that do not allow the borrowers to repay all or a portion of the loans prior to maturity and then re-borrow such repaid amounts under the loan again. Leveraged loans are generally senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated debt which are issued by companies with below investment grade or junk ratings or, if not rated, would be rated below investment grade or junk and, as a result, carry a higher risk of default. Leveraged loans also have the benefit of first or second lien security interests on the assets of the portfolio company, which may rank ahead of, or be junior to, other security interests. We also purchase mezzanine debt and make equity investments in middle market companies. Mezzanine debt is typically unsecured and subordinated to senior debt of the portfolio company. As of November 30, 2016, 70.0% of our debt portfolio at fair value consisted of debt securities for which issuers were not required to make principal payments until the maturity of such debt securities, which could result in a substantial loss to us if such issuers are unable to refinance or repay their debt at maturity.
Substantially all of the debt investments held in our portfolio hold a non-investment grade rating by one or more rating agencies (which non-investment grade debt is commonly referred to as high yield and junk debt) or, if not rated, would be rated below investment grade or junk if rated. In addition, 81.7% of our debt investments at November 30, 2016 had variable interest rates that reset periodically based on benchmarks such as LIBOR and the prime rate. As a result, significant increases in such benchmarks in the future may make it more difficult for these borrowers to service their obligations under the debt investments that we hold.
While our primary focus is to generate current income and capital appreciation from our debt and equity investments in middle market companies, we may invest up to 30% of the portfolio in opportunistic investments in order to seek to enhance returns to stockholders. Such investments may include investments in distressed debt, including securities of companies in bankruptcy, foreign debt, private equity, securities of public companies that are not thinly traded and structured finance vehicles such as collateralized loan obligation funds. Although we have no current intention to do so, to the extent we invest in private equity funds, we will limit our investments in entities that are excluded from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act), which includes private equity funds, to no more than 15% of its net assets.
1
As of November 30, 2016, we had total assets of $305.5 million and investments in 30 portfolio companies and an additional investment in the subordinated notes of one collateralized loan obligation fund, Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (Saratoga CLO), which investment had a fair value of $11.0 million as of November 30, 2016. Our overall portfolio composition as of November 30, 2016 consisted of 3.5% of syndicated loans, 57.8% of first lien term loans, 28.9% of second lien term loans, 5.5% of subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO and Class F notes tranche of the Saratoga CLO and 4.3% of common equity. As of November 30, 2016, the weighted average yield on all of our debt investments, including our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO and Class F notes tranche of the Saratoga CLO, was approximately 10.8%. The weighted average yield of our debt investments is not the same as a return on investment for our stockholders and, among other things, is calculated before the payment of our fees and expenses. As of November 30, 2016, approximately 100.0% of our first lien debt investments, which comprises 57.8% of our portfolio, were fully collateralized in which we held such investments had an asset coverage equal to or greater than the principal amount of the related debt investment. The Company uses enterprise value to assess the level of collateralization of its portfolio companies. The enterprise value of a portfolio company is determined by analyzing various factors, including EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), cash flows from operations less capital expenditures and other pertinent factors, such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio companys securities or other liquidation events. As a result, while we consider a portfolio company to be collateralized if its enterprise value exceeds the amount of our loan, we do not hold tangible assets as collateral in our portfolio companies that we would obtain in the event of a default. Even though these loans are fully collateralized as is the case with all of the liens on our debt investments, there can be no assurance that the value of collateral will be sufficient to allow the portfolio company repay our first lien debt investments in the event of its default on our investment.
Saratoga CLO is an exempted company with limited liability incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, which was established to acquire or participate in U.S. dollar-denominated corporate debt obligations. Saratoga CLO has issued various tranches of senior notes, held by numerous investors, and one tranche of subordinated notes, held entirely by us. As we own 100% of the subordinated notes issued by Saratoga CLO, which is junior to all of its other outstanding indebtedness, we are deemed to hold 100% of the equity interests in Saratoga CLO for tax purposes. Our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO represents a first loss position in a portfolio that, at November 30, 2016, was composed of $297.5 million in aggregate principal amount of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. A first loss position means that we will suffer the first economic losses if losses are incurred on loans held by the Saratoga CLO or losses otherwise incurred by Saratoga CLO, including its incurrence of operating expenses in excess of its operating income. As a result, this investment is subject to unique risks. See Risk FactorsOur investment in Saratoga CLO constitutes a leveraged investment in a portfolio of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans and is subject to additional risks and volatility for information regarding the general risks related to our investment in Saratoga CLO. Although we believe that we have observed and will observe certain formalities and operating procedures that are generally recognized requirements for maintaining our separate existence and that our assets and liabilities can be readily identified as distinct from those of Saratoga CLO, there can be no assurance that a bankruptcy court, in the exercise of its broad equitable powers, would not order that our assets and liabilities be substantively consolidated with those of Saratoga CLO in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding involving us or Saratoga CLO, including for the purposes of making distributions under a plan of reorganization or liquidation. Substantive consolidation means that our assets are placed in a single bankruptcy estate with those of Saratoga CLO, rather than kept separate, and that the creditors of Saratoga CLO have a claim against that single estate (including our assets), as opposed to retaining their claims against only Saratoga CLO. See Risk FactorsIn the event that a bankruptcy court orders the substantive consolidation of us with Saratoga CLO, the creditors of Saratoga CLO, including the holders of $282.4 million aggregate principal amount of debt, as of November 30, 2016, issued by Saratoga CLO, would have claims against the consolidated bankruptcy estate.
On January 22, 2008, we entered into a collateral management agreement with Saratoga CLO, pursuant to which we act as its collateral manager. In addition, we purchased for $30.0 million all of the outstanding
2
subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO. The Saratoga CLO was initially refinanced in October 2013 and its reinvestment period ended in October 2016. On November 15, 2016, we completed the second refinancing of the Saratoga CLO. The Saratoga CLO refinancing, among other things, extended its reinvestment period to October 2018, and extended its legal maturity date to October 2025. Following the refinancing, the Saratoga CLO portfolio remained at the same size and with a similar capital structure of approximately $300 million in aggregate principal amount of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. In addition to refinancing its liabilities, we also purchased $4.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the Class F notes tranche of the Saratoga CLO at par, with a coupon of 8.5%. The Class F tranche is the eighth tranche in the capital structure of Saratoga CLO and is subordinated to the other debt classes of Saratoga CLO. The Class F tranche is only senior to the subordinated notes, which is effectively the equity position in Saratoga CLO. As a result, the other tranches of debt in Saratoga CLO rank ahead of the $4.5 million Class F tranche and ahead of the aggregate principal amount of our position in the subordinated notes, which as of November 30, 2016 had a fair value of $4.3 million, with respect to priority of payments in the event of a default or a liquidation.
The Saratoga CLO remains effectively 100% owned and managed by Saratoga Investment Corp. because the Company owns all of the outstanding subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO, which is the equivalent of an equity position, and the Company manages the portfolio of Saratoga CLO. We receive a base management fee of 0.10% and a subordinated management fee of 0.40% of the fee basis amount at the beginning of the collection period, paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee equal to 20.0% of excess cash flow to the extent the Saratoga CLO subordinated notes receive an internal rate of return paid in cash equal to or greater than 12.0%.
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act). As a BDC, we are required to comply with various regulatory requirements, including limitations on our use of debt. We finance our investments through borrowings. However, as a BDC, we are only generally allowed to borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowing.
We have elected to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company (RIC), under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders if we meet certain source-of-income, distribution and asset diversification requirements.
In addition, we have a wholly-owned subsidiary that is licensed as a small business investment company (SBIC) and regulated by the Small Business Administration (SBA). See RegulationSmall Business Investment Company Regulations. The SBIC license allows us, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. We received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows us increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test by permitting us to borrow up to $150 million more than we would otherwise be able to absent the receipt of this exemptive relief.
Saratoga Investment Advisors
Our investment adviser was formed in 2010 as a Delaware limited liability company and became our investment adviser in July 2010. Our investment adviser is led by four principals, Christian L. Oberbeck, Michael J. Grisius, Thomas V. Inglesby, and Charles G. Phillips, with 28, 26, 29 and 19 years of experience in leveraged finance, respectively. Our investment adviser is affiliated with Saratoga Partners, a middle market private equity
3
investment firm. Saratoga Partners was established in 1984 to be the middle market private investment arm of Dillon Read & Co. Inc. and has been independent of Dillon Read since 1998. Saratoga Partners has a 28-year history of private investments in middle market companies and focuses on public and private equity, preferred stock, and senior and mezzanine debt investments.
We utilize the personnel, infrastructure, relationships and experience of Saratoga Investment Advisors to enhance the growth of our business. We currently have no employees and each of our executive officers is also an officer of Saratoga Investment Advisors.
We have entered into an investment advisory and management agreement (the Management Agreement) with Saratoga Investment Advisors. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors implements our business strategy on a day-to-day basis and performs certain services for us under the direction of our board of directors. Saratoga Investment Advisors is responsible for, among other duties, performing all of our day-to-day investment-related functions, determining investment criteria, sourcing, analyzing and executing investments, asset sales, financings and performing asset management duties.
Saratoga Investment Advisors has formed an investment committee to advise and consult with its senior management team with respect to our investment policies, investment portfolio holdings, financing and leveraging strategies and investment guidelines. We believe that the collective experience of the investment committee members across a variety of fixed income asset classes will benefit us. The investment committee must unanimously approve all investments in excess of $1 million made by us. In addition, all sales of our investments must be approved by three out of four investment committee members. The current members of the investment committee are Messrs. Oberbeck, Grisius, Inglesby, and Phillips.
Investments
Our portfolio is comprised primarily of investments in leveraged loans issued by middle market companies. Investments in middle market companies are generally less liquid than equivalent investments in companies with larger capitalizations. These investments are sourced in both the primary and secondary markets through a network of relationships with commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies and financial sponsors. The leveraged loans that we purchase are generally used to finance buyouts, acquisitions, growth, recapitalizations and other types of transactions. Leveraged loans are generally senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated debt which are issued by companies with below investment grade or junk ratings or, if not rated, would be rated below investment grade or junk and, as a result, carry a higher risk of default. Leveraged loans also have the benefit of security interests on the assets of the portfolio company, which may rank ahead of, or be junior to, other security interests. For a discussion risks pertaining to our secured investments, see Risk FactorsOur investments may be risky, and you could lose all or part of our investment.
As part of our long-term strategy, we also purchase mezzanine debt and make equity investments in middle market companies. Mezzanine debt is typically unsecured and subordinated to senior debt of the portfolio company. See Risk FactorsIf we make unsecured debt investments, we may lack adequate protection in the event our portfolio companies become distressed or insolvent and will likely experience a lower recovery than more senior debtholders in the event our portfolio companies defaults on their indebtedness.
In general, at least 70% of a BDCs assets must be comprised of the type of assets that are listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets. Qualifying assets are generally securities of U.S. private operating companies, or listed operating companies with an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million. As of November 30, 2016, with the exception of our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO and a first lien term loan to one other portfolio company, all of our equity and debt investments constituted qualifying assets under the 1940 Act. While
4
our primary focus is to generate current income and capital appreciation from our debt and equity investments in middle market companies, we may invest up to 30% of the portfolio in opportunistic investments in order to seek to enhance returns to stockholders. Such investments may include investments in distressed debt, private equity, securities of public companies that are not thinly traded and structured finance vehicles such as collateralized loan obligation funds.
Prospective portfolio company characteristics
Our investment adviser generally selects portfolio companies with one or more of the following characteristics:
| a history of generating stable earnings and strong free cash flow; |
| well-constructed balance sheets, including an established tangible liquidation value; |
| reasonable debt-to-cash flow multiples; |
| industry leadership with competitive advantages and sustainable market shares in attractive sectors; and |
| capital structures that provide appropriate terms and reasonable covenants. |
Investment selection
In managing us, Saratoga Investment Advisors employs the same investment philosophy and portfolio management methodologies used by Saratoga Partners. Through this investment selection process, based on quantitative and qualitative analysis, Saratoga Investment Advisors seeks to identify portfolio companies with superior fundamental risk-reward profiles and strong, defensible business franchises with the goal of minimizing principal losses while maximizing risk-adjusted returns. Saratoga Investment Advisors investment process emphasizes the following:
| bottoms-up, company-specific research and analysis; |
| capital preservation, low volatility and minimization of downside risk; and |
| investing with experienced management teams that hold meaningful equity ownership in their businesses. |
Our investment advisers investment process generally includes the following steps:
| Initial screening. A brief analysis identifies the investment opportunity and reviews the merits of the transaction. The initial screening memorandum provides a brief description of the company, its industry, competitive position, capital structure, financials, equity sponsor and deal economics. If the deal is determined to be attractive by the senior members of the deal team, the opportunity is fully analyzed. |
| Comprehensive analysis. A comprehensive analysis includes: |
| Business and Industry analysisa review of the companys business position, competitive dynamics within its industry, cost and growth drivers and technological and geographic factors. Business and industry research often includes meetings with industry experts, consultants, other investors, customers and competitors. |
| Company analysisa review of the companys historical financial performance, future projections, cash flow characteristics, balance sheet strength, liquidation value, legal, financial and accounting risks, contingent liabilities, market share analysis and growth prospects. The Company considers the ability of each portfolio company to continue to make |
5
payments in an atmosphere of rising interest rates as a component of its overall diligence and monitoring process. In this regard, the Company regularly receives projections from its portfolio companies and models future performance for them in connection with its valuation process, taking into account changes in interest rates on the portfolio companies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurances that the portfolio companies will be able to meet their contractual obligations at any or all levels of increases in interest rates. |
| Structural/security analysisa thorough legal document analysis including but not limited to an assessment of financial and negative covenants, events of default, enforceability of liens and voting rights. |
| Approval of the investment committee. The investment is then presented to the investment committee for approval. The investment committee must unanimously approve all investments in excess of $1 million made by us. In addition, all sales of our investments must be approved by four out of five investment committee members. |
Investment structure
In general, our investment adviser intends to select investments with financial covenants and terms that reduce leverage over time, thereby enhancing credit quality. These methods include:
| maintenance leverage covenants requiring a decreasing ratio of debt to cash flow; |
| maintenance cash flow covenants requiring an increasing ratio of cash flow to the sum of interest expense and capital expenditures; and |
| debt incurrence prohibitions, limiting a companys ability to re-lever. |
In addition, limitations on asset sales and capital expenditures should prevent a company from changing the nature of its business or capitalization without our consent.
Our investment adviser seeks, where appropriate, to limit the downside potential of our investments by:
| requiring a total return on our investments (including both interest and potential equity appreciation) that compensates us for credit risk; |
| requiring companies to use a portion of their excess cash flow to repay debt; |
| selecting investments with covenants that incorporate call protection as part of the investment structure; and |
| selecting investments with affirmative and negative covenants, default penalties, lien protection, change of control provisions and board rights, including either observation or participation rights. |
Valuation process
We carry our investments at fair value, as approved in good faith using written policies and procedures adopted by our board of directors. Investments for which market quotations are readily available are recorded in our financial statements at such market quotations subject to any decision by our board of directors to approve a fair value determination to reflect significant events affecting the value of these investments. We value investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair value as approved in good faith by our board of directors based on input from Saratoga Investment Advisors, our audit committee and, on a selected basis, a third party independent valuation firm. Determinations of fair value may involve subjective judgments and estimates. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of our investments
6
include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, market yield trend analysis, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.
Our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO is carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for similar collateralized loan obligation fund subordinated notes or equity, when available. Specifically, we use Intex cash flow models, or an appropriate substitute, to form the basis for Saratoga CLOs valuation. The models use a set of assumptions including projected default rates, recovery rates, reinvestment rate and prepayment rates in order to arrive at estimated cash flows. The assumptions are based on available market data and projections provided by third parties as well as management estimates. We use the output from the Intex models (i.e., the estimated cash flows from our investment in Saratoga CLO) to perform a discounted cash flows analysis on expected future cash flows from our investment in Saratoga CLO to determine a valuation for the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO held by us.
We undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter when valuing investments for which market quotations are not readily available, as described below:
| each investment is initially valued by the responsible investment professionals of Saratoga Investment Advisors and preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with our senior management; and |
| an independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors independently values at least one quarter of our investments each quarter so that the valuation of each investment for which market quotes are not readily available is independently valued by an independent valuation firm at least annually. |
In addition, all our investments are subject to the following valuation process:
| the audit committee of our board of directors reviews each preliminary valuation and our investment adviser and independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee; and |
| our board of directors discusses the valuations and approves the fair value of each investment in good faith based on the input of our investment adviser, independent valuation firm (if applicable) and audit committee. |
Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The determination of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.
Ongoing relationships with and monitoring of portfolio companies
Saratoga Investment Advisors closely monitors each investment we make and, when appropriate, conducts a regular dialogue with both the management team and other debtholders and seeks specifically tailored financial reporting. In addition, in certain circumstances, senior investment professionals of Saratoga Investment Advisors may take board seats or board observation seats.
7
Risk Factors
Investing in us involves significant risks. The following is a summary of certain risks that you should carefully consider before investing in us. For a further discussion of these risk factors, please see Risk Factors beginning on page 22.
Risks Related to Our Business and Structure
| The current state of the economy and financial markets increases the likelihood of adverse effects on our financial position and results of operations. |
| Saratoga Investment Advisors has a limited history of managing a BDC or a RIC. |
| We may be obligated to pay Saratoga Investment Advisors incentive fees even if we incur a net loss or there is a decline in the value of our portfolio. |
| Under the terms of the Management Agreement, we may have to pay incentive fees to Saratoga Investment Advisors in connection with the sale of an investment that is sold at a price higher than the fair value of such investment on May 31, 2010, even if we incur a loss on the sale of such investment. |
| The way in which the base management and incentive fees under the Management Agreement is determined may encourage Saratoga Investment Advisors to take actions that may not be in the best interests of the holders of our securities. |
| The base management fee we pay to Saratoga Investment Advisors may cause it to increase our leverage contrary to our interest. |
| We employ leverage, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in our securities. |
| Saratoga Investment Advisors liability is limited under the Management Agreement and we will indemnify Saratoga Investments Advisors against certain liabilities, which may lead it to act in a riskier manner on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account. |
| Substantially all of our assets are subject to security interests under the Credit Facility, or claims of the SBA with respect to SBA-guaranteed debentures we may issue and if we default on our obligations thereunder, we may suffer adverse consequences, including Madison Capital Funding and/or the SBA foreclosing on our assets. |
| We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates, including potential effects on our cost of capital and net investment income. |
| There are significant potential conflicts of interest which could adversely impact our investment returns. |
| Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations, or changes in the interpretation thereof, and any failure by us to comply with laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business. |
| We face cyber-security risks. |
| If we are unable to maintain the availability of our electronic data systems and safeguard the security of our data, our ability to conduct business may be compromised, which could impair our liquidity, disrupt our business, damage our reputation and cause losses. |
| Regulations governing our operation as a BDC affect our ability to, and the way in which we, raise additional capital. |
| Pending legislation may allow us to incur additional leverage. |
8
| The agreement governing the Credit Facility contains various covenants that, among other things, limits our discretion in operating our business and provides for certain minimum financial covenants. |
| A failure on our part to maintain our qualification as a BDC would significantly reduce our operating flexibility. |
| We will be subject to corporate-level federal income tax if we fail to continue to qualify as a RIC. |
| Because we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our income to our stockholders in connection with our election to be treated as a RIC, we will continue to need additional capital to finance our growth. If additional funds are unavailable or not available on favorable terms, our ability to grow will be impaired. |
| We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash in respect of such income. |
| Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted. |
| We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities. |
| Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results. |
| We are a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, and therefore we are not limited with respect to the proportion of our assets that may be invested in securities of a single issuer. |
| Our financial condition and results of operation depend on our ability to manage future investments effectively. |
| We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results. |
| Substantially all of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as approved in good faith by our board of directors; such valuations are inherently uncertain and may be materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments. |
| If we make unsecured debt investments, we may lack adequate protection in the event our portfolio companies become distressed or insolvent and will likely experience a lower recovery than more senior debtholders in the event our portfolio companies default on their indebtedness. |
| If we invest in the securities and other obligations of distressed or bankrupt companies, such investments may be subject to significant risks, including lack of income, extraordinary expenses, uncertainty with respect to satisfaction of debt, lower-than expected investment values or income potentials and resale restrictions. |
| Second priority liens on collateral securing loans that we make to our portfolio companies may be subject to control by senior creditors with first priority liens. If there is a default, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full both the first priority creditors and us. |
| The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business. |
| The debt securities in which we invest are subject to credit risk and prepayment risk. |
| Our investment in Saratoga CLO constitutes a leveraged investment in a portfolio of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans and is subject to additional risks and volatility. |
| Our investments in Saratoga CLO are typically broadly syndicated loans that have a different risk profile than would direct investments made by us, including less information available and fewer rights regarding repayment compared to companies we invest in directly as well as complicated accounting and tax implications. |
9
| Failure by Saratoga CLO to satisfy certain financial covenants may entitle senior debtholders to additional payments, which may harm our operating results by reducing payments we would otherwise be entitled to receive from Saratoga CLO. |
| Available information about privately held companies is limited. |
| When we are a debt or minority equity investor in a portfolio company, we may not be in a position to control the entity, and its management may make decisions that could decrease the value of our investment. |
| Our portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies. |
| There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims. |
| Investments in equity securities involve a substantial degree of risk. |
| Our investments in foreign debt, including that of emerging market issuers, may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments. |
| We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions. |
| Our board of directors may change our investment objective, operating policies and strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse. |
| We have no prior experience managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA regulations, resulting from our lack of experience or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on our operations. |
| Our investments may be risky, and you could lose all or part of your investment. |
| Our independent auditors have not assessed our internal control over financial reporting. If our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, it could have a material adverse effect on our stock price and our ability to raise capital. |
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
| Investing in our common stock may involve an above average degree of risk. |
| We may continue to choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which case you may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash you receive. |
| The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly. |
| There is a risk that you may not receive distributions or that our distributions may not grow over time. |
| Provisions of our governing documents and the Maryland General Corporation Law could deter future takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. |
| Our common stock may trade at a discount to our net asset value per share. |
| Stockholders may incur dilution if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock. |
| The issuance of subscription rights, warrants or convertible debt that are exchangeable for our common stock will cause your economic interest and voting power in us to be diluted as a result of our offering of any such securities. |
| We may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds from this offering, which could harm our financial condition and operating results. |
10
Recent Developments
On December 21, 2016, we issued $74.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our 6.75% fixed-rate notes due 2023 (the 2023 Notes) for net proceeds of $72.1 million after deducting underwriting commissions of approximately $2.0 million and offering costs of approximately $0.5 million. The issuance included the exercise of substantially all of the underwriters option to purchase an additional $9.8 million aggregate principal amount of 2023 Notes within 30 days. Interest on the 2023 Notes is paid quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15, at a rate of 6.75% per year, beginning March 30, 2017. The 2023 Notes mature on December 20, 2023, and commencing December 21, 2019, may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option. The net proceeds from the offering were used to repay all of the outstanding indebtedness under our 7.50% unsecured notes due 2020 (the 2020 Notes), which amounts to $61.8 million, and for general corporate purposes in accordance with our investment objective and strategies. The 2020 Notes were redeemed in full on January 13, 2017.
On February 28, 2017, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.46 per share, payable on March 28, 2017, to common stockholders of record as of March 15, 2017.
Corporate History and Information
We commenced operations on March 23, 2007 as GSC Investment Corp. and completed an initial public offering (IPO) of shares of our common stock on March 28, 2007. From the date we commenced operations until July 30, 2010, we were managed and advised by GSCP (NJ), L.P., an entity affiliated with GSC Group, Inc. In connection with the consummation of a recapitalization transaction on July 30, 2010, we engaged Saratoga Investment Advisors to replace GSCP (NJ), L.P. as our investment adviser and changed our name to Saratoga Investment Corp.
The recapitalization transaction consisted of (i) the private sale of 986,842 shares of our common stock for $15 million in aggregate purchase price to Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates and (ii) the entry into a senior secured revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility) with Madison Capital Funding LLC (Madison Capital Funding). We used the net proceeds from the private sale of shares of our common stock and a portion of the funds available to us under the Credit Facility with Madison Capital Funding to pay the full amount of principal and accrued interest, including default interest, outstanding under our revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch. Specifically, in July 2009, we had exceeded permissible borrowing limits under the revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank, which resulted in an event of default under the revolving securitized credit facility. As a result of the event of default, Deutsche Bank had the right to accelerate repayment of the outstanding indebtedness under the revolving securitized credit facility and to foreclose and liquidate the collateral pledged under the revolving securitized credit facility. The revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank was terminated in connection with our payment of all amounts outstanding thereunder on July 30, 2010. In January 2011, we registered for public resale by Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates the 986,842 shares of our common stock issued to them in the recapitalization.
On March 28, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Corp SBIC, LP, received an SBIC license from the SBA.
Our corporate offices are located at 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022. Our telephone number is (212) 906-7800. We maintain a website on the Internet at www.saratogainvestmentcorp.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and you should not consider that information to be part of this prospectus.
11
We may offer, from time to time, up to $70,000,000 of our securities, on terms to be determined at the time of the offering. Our securities may be offered at prices and on terms to be disclosed in one or more prospectus supplements.
Our securities may be offered directly to one or more purchasers by us or through agents designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus supplement relating to the offering will disclose the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our securities by us, the purchase price, and any fee, commission or discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may not sell any of our securities directly or through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of our securities.
Set forth below is additional information regarding the offering of our securities:
Use of proceeds |
We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from the sale of our securities to make investments in middle-market companies in accordance with our investment objective and strategies described in this prospectus, and for general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to reduce any of our outstanding borrowings. Pending such use, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in high quality, short-term debt securities consistent with our business development company election and our election to be taxed as a RIC. See Use of Proceeds. |
Investment Advisory and Management Agreement |
Saratoga Investment Advisors serves as our investment adviser. Our investment adviser was formed in 2010 as a Delaware limited liability company and became our investment advisor in July 2010. Subject to the overall supervision of our board of directors, Saratoga Investment Advisors manages our day-to-day operations and provides investment advisory and management services to us. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors: |
| determines the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such changes; |
| identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments we make (including performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio companies); |
| closes and monitors the investments we make; and |
| determines the securities and other assets that we purchase, retain or sell. |
Pursuant to the Management Agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, we pay Saratoga Investment Advisors a fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of two componentsa base management fee and an incentive fee. |
12
The base management fee is paid quarterly in arrears, and equals 1.75% per annum of our gross assets (other than cash or cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) and calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter based on the average value of our gross assets (other than cash or cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) as of the end of such fiscal quarter and the end of the immediate prior fiscal quarter. Base management fees for any partial month or quarter are appropriately pro-rated. |
The incentive fee has the following two parts: |
The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. Pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence, managerial and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal quarter, minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the administration agreement, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock or debt security, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as market discount, debt instruments with payment-in-kind interest, preferred stock with payment-in-kind dividends and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets (defined as total assets less liabilities) at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, is compared to a hurdle rate of 1.875% per quarter, subject to a catch up. The base management fee is calculated prior to giving effect to the payment of any incentive fees. |
We pay Saratoga Investment Advisors an incentive fee with respect to our pre-incentive fee net investment income in each fiscal quarter as follows: (A) no incentive fee in any fiscal quarter in which our pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the hurdle rate; (B) 100.0% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.344% in any fiscal quarter is payable to Saratoga Investment Advisors; and (C) 20.0% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 2.344% in any fiscal quarter. We refer to the amount specified in clause (B) as the catch-up. The catch-up provision is intended to provide Saratoga Investment Advisors with an incentive fee of 20.0% on all of our pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our |
13
pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds 2.344% in any fiscal quarter. There is no accumulation of amounts from quarter to quarter on either the hurdle rate or the parameters set by the catch-up mechanism or any clawback of amounts previously paid to Saratoga Investment Advisers if subsequent quarters are below the quarterly hurdle or the catch-up parameters. Furthermore, there is no delay of payment to Saratoga Investment Advisers if prior quarters are below the quarterly hurdle or catch-up. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any period ending on or prior to December 31, 2010, Saratoga Investment Advisors was only entitled to 20.0% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeded 1.875% in any fiscal quarter without any catch-up provision. These calculations are appropriately pro-rated when such calculations are applicable for any period of less than three months. See Management Agreements. |
Administration Agreement |
Pursuant to a separate administration agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors, who also serves as our administrator, furnishes us with office facilities, equipment and clerical, book-keeping and record keeping services. Under the administration agreement, our administrator also performs, or oversees the performance of, our required administrative services, which include, among other things, being responsible for the financial records which we are required to maintain, preparing reports for our stockholders and reports required to be filed with the SEC. In addition, our administrator assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value, oversees the preparation and filing of our tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others. Payments under the administration agreement equal an amount based upon our allocable portion of our administrators overhead in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the cost of our officers and their respective staffs relating to the performance of services under this agreement (including travel expenses). Our allocable portion is based on the proportion that our total assets bears to the total assets administered or managed by our administrator. Under the administration agreement, our administrator also provides managerial assistance, on our behalf, to those portfolio companies who accept our offer of assistance. The administration agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days written notice to the other party. The amount payable by us under the administration agreement was capped at $1.0 million for the initial two year term that began on July 10, 2010, and for subsequent annual renewals of the agreement. On October 5, 2016, our board of directors approved the renewal of the administration agreement for an additional one-year term and determined to increase the cap on the payment or reimbursement of expenses by us thereunder to $1.5 million for the additional one-year term, effective November 1, 2016. See Management Agreements. |
14
Distributions |
Our distributions, if any, will be determined by our board of directors and paid out of assets legally available for distribution. Prior to January 2009, we paid quarterly distributions to our stockholders. However, in January 2009, we suspended the practice of paying quarterly distributions to our stockholders and only paid five dividend distributions (December 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) to our stockholders through December 2013, which distributions were made with a combination of cash and the issuance of shares of our common stock. On September 24, 2014, our board of directors adopted a new dividend policy pursuant to which we will begin to again pay a regular quarterly cash distributions to our shareholders. In this regard, most recently our board of directors declared a distribution in the amount of $0.45 per share for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2016. The distribution for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2016 has a payment date of February 9, 2017 to all stockholders of record at the close of business on January 31, 2016. As disclosed in the table under Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions, beginning on page 49 of this prospectus, our board of directors has continued to declare regular quarterly cash distribution, to our shareholders since adopting our new dividend policy. |
Taxation |
We elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. Accordingly, we generally will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or realized net capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To maintain our RIC tax treatment, we must meet specified source-of- income and asset diversification requirements and distribute annually at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which generated such taxable income. See Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations. |
Dividend reinvestment plan |
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically opt out of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends. Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of our common stock will be subject to the same federal, state and local tax consequences as stockholders who elect to receive their distributions in cash, and will need to pay any such taxes from other sources in light of the fact that their distributions will be reinvested in additional shares of the Companys common stock. See Dividend Reinvestment Plan for a description of the plan and information on how to opt out of the plan. |
15
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. Moreover, the information set forth below does not include any transaction costs and expenses that investors will incur in connection with each offering of our securities pursuant to this prospectus. As a result, investors are urged to read the Fees and Expenses table contained in any corresponding prospectus supplement to fully understanding the actual transaction costs and expenses they will incur in connection with each such offering. Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by you, us or Saratoga Investment Corp., or that we will pay fees or expenses, stockholders will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in Saratoga Investment Corp.
Stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering price): |
| |||||
Sales load paid |
% | (1) | ||||
Offering expenses borne by us |
% | (2) | ||||
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses |
None | (3) | ||||
|
|
|||||
Total stockholder transaction expenses paid |
% | |||||
Annual estimated expenses (as a percentage of average net assets attributable to common stock): |
||||||
Management fees |
3.4% | (4) | ||||
Incentive fees payable under the Management Agreement |
2.1% | (5) | ||||
Interest payments on borrowed funds |
6.0% | (6) | ||||
Other expenses |
3.0% | (7) | ||||
|
|
|||||
Total annual expenses |
14.5% | (8) |
(1) | In the event that the shares of common stock to which this prospectus relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will disclose the applicable sales load. |
(2) | The prospectus supplement corresponding to each offering will disclose the applicable offering expenses and total stockholder transaction expenses. |
(3) | The expenses associated with the administration of our dividend reinvestment plan are included in Other expenses. The participants in the dividend reinvestment plan will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to open market purchases, if any, made by the administrator under the plan. For more details about the plan, see Dividend Reinvestment Plan. |
(4) | Our base management fee under the Management Agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors is based on our gross assets, which is defined as our total assets, including those acquired using borrowings for investment purposes, but excluding cash and cash equivalents. See Investment Advisory and Management Agreement. The fact that our base management fee is payable based upon our gross assets, rather than our net assets (i.e., total assets after deduction of any liabilities, including borrowings) means that our base management fee as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock will increase when we utilize leverage. |
(5) | The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or hurdle, and a catch up feature. For this purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence, managerial and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued by us during the fiscal quarter, minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the administration agreement described below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). |
16
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Management Agreement) and equals 20% of our incentive fee capital gains, which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from May 31, 2010 through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee. Under the Management Agreement, the capital gains portion of the incentive fee is based on realized gains and realized and unrealized losses from May 31, 2010. Therefore, realized and unrealized losses incurred prior to such time will not be taken into account when calculating the capital gains portion of the incentive fee, and Saratoga Investment Advisors will be entitled to 20% of incentive fee capital gains that arise after May 31, 2010. In addition, the cost basis for computing realized gains and losses on investments held by us as of May 31, 2010 will equal the fair value of such investments as of such date. We estimate this as zero for purposes of this table as these fees are hard to predict, as they are based on capital gains and losses. See Investment Advisory and Management Agreement.
(6) | We may borrow funds from time to time to make investments to the extent we determine that the economic situation is conducive to doing so. The 6.0% figure in the table includes all expected borrowing costs in connection with the secured revolving credit facility we have with Madison Capital Funding LLC. The costs associated with our outstanding borrowings are indirectly borne by our stockholders. We do not expect to issue any preferred stock during the next twelve months and, therefore, have not included the cost of issuing and servicing preferred stock in the table. In addition, all of the commitment fees, interest expense, amortized financing costs of our Credit Facility, SBA debentures, and the 2023 Notes, and the fees and expenses of issuing and servicing any other borrowings or leverage that we expect to incur during the next twelve months are included in the table and expense example presentation below. |
(7) | Other expenses are based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year and include our overhead expenses, including payments under our administration agreement based on our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by Saratoga Investment Advisors in performing its obligations under the administration agreement. See Administration Agreement. |
(8) | This figure includes all of the fees and expenses of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Saratoga Investment Corp SBIC, LP and Saratoga Investment Funding LLC. Furthermore, this table reflects all of the fees and expenses borne by us with respect to our investment in Saratoga CLO. |
Example
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total cumulative expenses over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have assumed that we would have no additional leverage and our annual operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above. In the event that shares to which this prospectus relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will restate this example to reflect the applicable sales load and offering expenses.
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | |||||||||||||
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment, assuming a 5% annual return on portfolio |
$ | 160 | $ | 505 | $ | 886 | $ | 2,016 |
This example and the expenses in the table above should not be considered a representation of our future expenses, and actual expenses (including the cost of debt, if any, and other expenses) may be greater or less than those shown.
The foregoing table is to assist you in understanding the various costs and expenses that an investor in our common stock will bear directly or indirectly. While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual
17
return, our performance will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. The example assumes that the 5% annual return is generated entirely through the realization of capital gains on our assets and, as a result, triggers the payment of an incentive fee on such capital gains under the Management Agreement. The pre-incentive fee net investment income under the Management Agreement, which, assuming a 5% annual return, would either not be payable or have an insignificant impact on the expense amounts shown above, is not included in the example. If we achieve sufficient returns on our investments, including through the realization of capital gains, to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses, and returns to our investors, would be higher.
While the example assumes reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of shares of our common stock, determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to a participant by either (i) the greater of (x) the net asset value of our common stock or (y) 95% of the market price per share of our common stock at the close of trading on the payment date fixed by our board of directors in the event that we use newly issued shares to satisfy the share requirements of the dividend reinvestment plan or (ii) the average purchase price, including any brokerage charges or other charges, of all shares of common stock purchased by the administrator of the dividend reinvestment plan in the event that shares are purchased in the open market to satisfy the share requirements of the dividend reinvestment plan, which may be at, above or below net asset value. See Dividend Reinvestment Plan for additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
18
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The following selected financial and other data reflects the consolidated financial condition and the consolidated statement of operations of Saratoga as of and for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015, February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013, and February 29, 2012. The selected financial and other data have been derived from our consolidated financial statements which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, whose report thereon is included in this registration statement. The financial information as of and for the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and 2015 was derived from our unaudited financial statements and related notes. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for the interim periods, have been included. The data should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included in this prospectus. The historical data is not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.
Nine Months Ended November 30, 2016 |
Nine Months Ended November 30, 2015 |
Year Ended February 29, 2016 |
Year Ended February 28, 2015 |
Year Ended February 28, 2014(5) |
Year Ended February 28, 2013(5) |
Year Ended February 29, 2012(5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share numbers) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and related portfolio income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 22,057 | $ | 19,980 | $ | 26,876 | $ | 24,688 | $ | 20,187 | $ | 14,450 | $ | 11,262 | ||||||||||||||
Management fee and other income |
2,742 | 2,275 | 3,174 | 2,687 | 2,706 | 2,557 | 2,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total interest and related portfolio income |
24,799 | 22,255 | 30,050 | 27,375 | 22,893 | 17,007 | 13,512 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and debt financing expenses |
7,107 | 6,241 | 8,456 | 7,375 | 6,084 | 2,540 | 1,298 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Base management and incentive management |
5,981 | 5,527 | 6,761 | 6,705 | 4,266 | 4,710 | 3,339 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Administrator expenses |
992 | 850 | 1,175 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Administrative and other |
2,158 | 2,181 | 2,866 | 2,327 | 2,669 | 2,287 | 2,638 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Expense reimbursement |
| |
|
|
|
| | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses after reimbursements |
16,238 | 14,799 | 19,258 | 17,407 | 14,019 | 10,537 | 8,275 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income before income taxes |
8,561 | 7,456 | 10,792 | 9,968 | 8,874 | 6,470 | 5,237 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expenses, including excise tax expense (credit) |
| (123 | ) | 114 | 294 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 8,561 | $ | 7,579 | $ | 10,678 | $ | 9,674 | $ | 8,874 | $ | 6,470 | $ | 5,237 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Nine Months Ended November 30, 2016 |
Nine Months Ended November 30, 2015 |
Year Ended February 29, 2016 |
Year Ended February 28, 2015 |
Year Ended February 28, 2014(5) |
Year Ended February 28, 2013(5) |
Year Ended February 29, 2012(5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share numbers) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) |
$ | 12,300 | $ | 4,231 | $ | 226 | $ | 3,276 | $ | 1,271 | $ | 431 | $ | (12,186 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) |
(10,728 | ) | 239 | 741 | (1,943 | ) | (1,648 | ) | 7,143 | 19,760 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total net gain (loss) |
1,572 | 4,470 | 967 | 1,333 | (377 | ) | 7,574 | 7,574 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 10,133 | $ | 12,049 | $ | 11,645 | $ | 11,007 | $ | 8,497 | $ | 14,044 | $ | 12,811 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Per Share: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common sharebasic and diluted(2) |
$ | 1.77 | $ | 2.18 | $ | 2.09 | $ | 2.04 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 3.42 | $ | 3.73 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income per sharebasic and |
$ | 1.49 | $ | 1.37 | $ | 1.91 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.57 | $ | 1.52 | ||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) per sharebasic and diluted(2) |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.24 | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 1.85 | $ | 2.21 | |||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share(3) |
$ | 1.48 | $ | 1.96 | $ | 2.36 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 2.65 | $ | 4.25 | $ | 3.00 | ||||||||||||||
Dilutive impact of dividends paid in stock on net asset value per share(4) |
$ | (0.14) | $ | (0.33) | $ | (0.37) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (1.40 | ) | $ | (1.99 | ) | ||||||||||
Net asset value per share |
$ | 22.21 | $ | 22.59 | $ | 22.06 | $ | 22.70 | $ | 21.08 | $ | 22.71 | $ | 24.94 | ||||||||||||||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment assets at fair value |
$ | 277,570 | $ | 241,038 | $ | 283,996 | $ | 240,538 | $ | 205,845 | $ | 155,080 | $ | 95,360 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets |
305,533 | 271,743 | 295,047 | 263,560 | 215,168 | 172,321 | 124,291 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt outstanding |
169,821 | 136,065 | 160,749 | 136,900 | 98,300 | 60,300 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
127,680 | 127,273 | 125,150 | 122,599 | 113,428 | 107,438 | 96,689 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value per common share |
$ | 22.21 | $ | 22.59 | $ | 22.06 | $ | 22.70 | $ | 21.08 | $ | 22.71 | $ | 24.94 | ||||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding at end of period |
5,748,247 | 5,634,115 | 5,672,227 | 5,401,899 | 5,379,616 | 4,730,116 | 3,876,661 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments funded |
$ | 85,851 | $ | 57,429 | $ | 109,191 | $ | 104,872 | $ | 121,074 | $ | 71,596 | $ | 38,679 | ||||||||||||||
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales |
$ | 94,691 | $ | 62,677 | $ | 68,174 | $ | 73,257 | $ | 71,607 | $ | 21,488 | $ | 33,568 | ||||||||||||||
Number of investments at end of period |
53 | 54 | 60 | 64 | 60 | 47 | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average yield of income producing debt investmentsNon-control/ non-affiliate |
10.70 | % | 10.57 | % | 10.82 | % | 11.07 | % | 10.62 | % | 11.26 | % | 11.88 | % | ||||||||||||||
Weighted average yield on income producing debt investmentsControl |
12.23 | % | 18.90 | % | 16.40 | % | 25.22 | % | 18.55 | % | 27.11 | % | 20.17 | % |
20
(1) | See note 6 in consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere herein. |
(2) | For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, amounts are calculated using weighted average common shares outstanding of 5,735,443 and 5,533,094, respectively. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015, February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, calculated using weighted average common shares outstanding of 5,582,453, 5,385,049, 4,920,517, 4,110,484, and 3,434,345, respectively. |
(3) | Calculated using the shares outstanding at ex-dividend date. |
(4) | Dilutive effect of the issuance of shares of common stock below net asset value per share in connection with the satisfaction of the Companys annual RIC distribution requirement. See Price Range of Common Stock and DistributionsDividend Policy. |
(5) | During the year ended February 28, 2015, the Company identified errors related to the accounting for the capital gains portion of the incentive fee for the years ended February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, as well as the cumulative impact of these errors as of February 28, 2014. The Company assessed the materiality of these errors and concluded they were not material to any prior annual periods, but the cumulative impact of correcting them would be quantitatively material to the results of operations of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2015, if the entire adjustment was recorded in that period. The corrections for the errors are reflected in the selected financial and other data. |
21
Investing in our securities involves a number of significant risks. You should carefully consider these risks, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, before making an investment in our securities. The risks set forth below are the principal risks with respect to the Company generally and with respect to business development companies, they may not be the only risks we face. This section nonetheless describes the principal risk factors associated with investment in the Company specifically, as well as those factors generally associated with investment in a company with investment objectives, investment policies, capital structure or trading markets similar to the Companys. If any of the risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our securities could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business and Structure
Market volatility and the condition of the debt and equity capital markets could negatively impact our financial condition and stock price.
Beginning in 2007, global credit and other financial markets began to suffer substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption. These forces reached extraordinary levels in 2008, resulting in the bankruptcy of, the acquisition of, or government intervention in the affairs of several major domestic and international financial institutions. In particular, the financial services sector was negatively impacted by significant write-offs as the value of the assets held by financial firms declined, impairing their capital positions and abilities to lend and invest. We believe that such value declines were exacerbated by widespread forced liquidations as leveraged holders of financial assets, faced with declining prices, were compelled to sell to meet margin requirements and maintain compliance with applicable capital standards. Such forced liquidations also impaired or eliminated many investors and investment vehicles, leading to a decline in the supply of capital for investment and depressed pricing levels for many assets. These events significantly diminished overall confidence in the debt and equity markets, engendered unprecedented declines in the values of certain assets, and caused extreme economic uncertainty. If market conditions similar to these were to recur, our assets could experience a similar decline in value, among other negative impacts to the company.
Since 2009, the global credit and other financial market conditions have improved as stability has increased throughout the international financial system and many public market indices have experienced positive total returns. However, the global macroeconomic environment and recovery from the downturn has been challenging and inconsistent. Instability in the global credit markets, the impact of periodic uncertainty regarding the U.S. federal budget, the instability in the geopolitical environment in many parts of the world, sovereign debt conditions in Europe and other disruptions may continue to put pressure on economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad.
We may be obligated to pay Saratoga Investment Advisors incentive fees even if we incur a net loss, or there is a decline in the value of our portfolio.
Saratoga Investment Advisors is entitled to incentive fees for each fiscal quarter in an amount equal to a percentage of the excess of our investment income for that quarter (before deducting incentive compensation, but net of operating expenses and certain other items) above a threshold return for that quarter. Our pre-incentive fee net investment income, for incentive compensation purposes, excludes realized and unrealized capital gains or losses that we may incur in the fiscal quarter, even if such capital gains or losses result in a net gain or loss on our consolidated statements of operations for that quarter. Thus, we may be required to pay Saratoga Investment Advisors incentive fees for a fiscal quarter even if there is a decline in the value of our portfolio or we incur a net loss for that quarter.
22
Under the terms of the Management Agreement, we may have to pay incentive fees to Saratoga Investment Advisors in connection with the sale of an investment that is sold at a price higher than the fair value of such investment on May 31, 2010, even if we incur a loss on the sale of such investment.
Incentive fees on capital gains paid to Saratoga Investment Advisors under the Management Agreement equals 20.0% of our incentive fee capital gains, which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from May 31, 2010 through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee. Under the Management Agreement, the capital gains portion of the incentive fee is based on realized gains and realized and unrealized losses from May 31, 2010. Therefore, realized and unrealized losses incurred prior to such time will not be taken into account when calculating the capital gains portion of the incentive fee, and Saratoga Investment Advisors will be entitled to 20.0% of the incentive fee capital gains that arise after May 31, 2010. In addition, the cost basis for computing realized gains and losses on investments held by us as of May 31, 2010 will equal the fair value of such investments as of such date. See our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2010 that was filed with the SEC on July 15, 2010 for the fair value and other information related to our investments as of such date. As a result, we may be required to pay incentive fees to Saratoga Investment Advisors on the sale of an investment even if we incur a realized loss on such investment, so long as the investment is sold for an amount greater than its fair value as of May 31, 2010.
The way in which the base management and incentive fees under the Management Agreement is determined may encourage Saratoga Investment Advisors to take actions that may not be in our best interests.
The incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser may create an incentive for it to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during cyclical economic downturns. The way in which the incentive fee payable to our investment adviser is determined, which is calculated separately in two components as a percentage of the income (subject to a hurdle rate) and as a percentage of the realized gain on invested capital, may encourage our investment adviser to use leverage to increase the return on our investments or otherwise manipulate our income so as to recognize income in quarters where the hurdle rate is exceeded. Moreover, we pay Saratoga Investment Advisors a base management fee based on our total assets, including any investments made with borrowings, which may create an incentive for it to cause us to incur more leverage than is prudent, or not to repay our outstanding indebtedness when it may be advantageous for us to do so, in order to maximize its compensation. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor the holders of our securities.
The incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser also may create an incentive for our investment adviser to invest on our behalf in instruments that have a deferred interest feature. Under these investments, we would accrue the interest over the life of the investment but would not receive the cash income from the investment until the end of the investments term, if at all. Our net investment income used to calculate the income portion of our incentive fee, however, includes accrued interest. Thus, a portion of the incentive fee would be based on income that we have not yet received in cash and may never receive in cash if the portfolio company is unable to satisfy such interest payment obligation to us. Consequently, while we may make incentive fee payments on income accruals that we may not collect in the future and with respect to which we do not have a claw back right against our investment adviser per se, the amount of accrued income written off in any period will reduce the income in the period in which such write-off was taken and may thereby reduce such periods incentive fee payment.
In addition, Saratoga Investment Advisors receives a quarterly income incentive fee based, in part, on our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. This income incentive fee is subject to a fixed quarterly hurdle rate before providing an income incentive fee return to Saratoga Investment Advisors. This fixed hurdle rate was determined when then current interest rates were relatively low on a historical basis. Thus, if interest rates rise, it would become easier for our investment income
23
to exceed the hurdle rate and, as a result, more likely that Saratoga Investment Advisors will receive an income incentive fee than if interest rates on our investments remained constant or decreased.
Moreover, our investment adviser receives the incentive fee based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on our investments. Unlike the portion of the incentive fee based on income, there is no performance threshold applicable to the portion of the incentive fee based on net capital gains. As a result, our investment adviser may have a tendency to invest more in investments that are likely to result in capital gains as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during economic downturns.
Our board of directors will seek to ensure that Saratoga Investment Advisors is acting in our best interests and that any conflict of interest faced by Saratoga Investment Advisors in its capacity as our investment adviser does not negatively impact us.
The base management fee we pay to Saratoga Investment Advisors may induce it to influence our leverage, which may be contrary to our interest.
We pay Saratoga Investment Advisors a quarterly base management fee based on the value of our total assets (including any assets acquired with leverage). Accordingly, Saratoga Investment Advisors has an economic incentive to increase our leverage. Our board of directors monitors the conflicts presented by this compensation structure by approving the amount of leverage that we incur. If our leverage is increased, we will be exposed to increased risk of loss, bear the increase cost of issuing and servicing such senior indebtedness, and will be subject to any additional covenant restrictions imposed on us in an indenture or other instrument or by the applicable lender.
We employ leverage, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us.
Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and, therefore, increase the risks associated with investing in us. We borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks and other lenders that is secured by a lien on our assets. Holders of these senior securities have fixed dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of the holders of our securities. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique. Any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on our outstanding indebtedness would cause our net income to increase more than it would have had we not incurred leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not incurred leverage. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock distributions or scheduled debt payments, including with respect to the 2023 Notes. There can be no assurance that our leveraging strategy will be successful.
Our outstanding indebtedness imposes, and additional debt we may incur in the future will likely impose, financial and operating covenants that restrict our business activities, including limitations that could hinder our ability to finance additional loans and investments or to make the distributions required to maintain our status as a RIC. A failure to add new debt facilities or issue additional debt securities or other evidences of indebtedness in lieu of or in addition to existing indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
As of November 30, 2016, we had $112.7 million outstanding indebtedness guaranteed by the SBA and $61.8 million of outstanding 2020 Notes. This debt requires periodic payments of interest. The weighted average interest rate charged on our borrowings as of November 30, 2016 was 4.73% per annum (exclusive of deferred financing costs). We will need to generate sufficient cash flow to make these required interest payments. In order for us to cover our annual interest payments on indebtedness, we must achieve annual returns on our November 30, 2016 total assets of at least 2.6%.
24
As of November 30, there was no outstanding balance under the Credit Facility. As of November 30, we had issued $112.7 million SBA-guaranteed debentures and $61.8 million of the 2020 Notes. On December 21, 2016, we issued $74.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes. On January 13, 2017, we redeemed the $61.8 million of outstanding 2020 Notes using the proceeds from the issuance of the 2023 Notes, leaving $9.8 million in net proceeds from the 2023 Notes offering. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future, including, but not limited to, borrowings under the Credit Facility or the issuance of additional debt securities in one or more public or private offerings, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so. Our ability to service our debt depends largely on our financial performance and is subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. The amount of leverage that we employ at any particular time will depend on our managements and our Board of Directors assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing.
Illustration. The following table illustrates the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our common stock assuming various annual returns, net of expenses. The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual returns may be higher or lower than those appearing below:
Assumed Return on Our Portfolio(1)
(net of expenses)
10.0% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 5.0% | 10.0% | ||||||||||||||||
Corresponding net return to common stockholder |
30.0 | % | 18.1 | % | 6.2 | % | 5.7 | % | 17.5 | % |
(1) | Assumes $300.3 million in average total assets, $170.0 million in average debt outstanding, $126.4 million in average net assets and an average interest rate of 4.73%. Actual interest payments may be different. |
Saratoga Investment Advisors liability is limited under the Management Agreement and we will indemnify Saratoga Investments Advisors against certain liabilities, which may lead it to act in a riskier manner on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.
Saratoga Investment Advisors has not assumed any responsibility to us other than to render the services described in the Management Agreement. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors and its officers and employees are not liable to us for their acts under the Management Agreement absent willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard in the performance of their duties. We have agreed to indemnify, defend and protect Saratoga Investment Advisors and its officers and employees with respect to all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses resulting from acts of Saratoga Investment Advisors not arising out of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard in the performance of their duties under the Management Agreement. These protections may lead Saratoga Investment Advisors to act in a riskier manner when acting on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.
Substantially all of our assets are subject to security interests under our Credit Facility or claims of the SBA with respect to SBA-guaranteed debentures we may issue and if we default on our obligations thereunder, we may suffer adverse consequences, including the foreclosure on our assets.
Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral under the Credit Facility or are subject to a superior claim over the holders of our common stock or the 2023 Notes by the SBA pursuant to the SBA-guaranteed debentures. If we default on our obligations under the Credit Facility or the SBA-guaranteed debentures, Madison Capital Funding and/or the SBA may have the right to foreclose upon and sell, or otherwise transfer, the collateral subject to their security interests or superior claim. In such event, we may be forced to sell our investments to raise funds to repay our outstanding borrowings in order to avoid foreclosure and these forced sales may be at times and at prices we would not consider advantageous. Moreover, such deleveraging of our company could significantly impair our ability to effectively operate our business in the manner in which we have historically operated.
25
In addition, if Madison Capital Funding exercises its right to sell the assets pledged under the Credit Facility, such sales may be completed at distressed sale prices, thereby diminishing or potentially eliminating the amount of cash available to us after repayment of the amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility.
We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates including potential effects on our cost of capital and net investment income.
General interest rate fluctuations and changes in credit spreads on floating rate loans may have a substantial negative impact on our investments and investment opportunities and, accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our rate of return on invested capital. In addition, an increase in interest rates would make it more expensive to use debt to finance our investments. Decreases in credit spreads on debt that pays a floating rate of return would have an impact on the income generation of our floating rate assets. Trading prices for debt that pays a fixed rate of return tend to fall as interest rates rise. Trading prices tend to fluctuate more for fixed rate securities that have longer maturities. Although we have no policy governing the maturities of our investments, under current market conditions we expect that we will invest in a portfolio of debt generally having maturities of up to ten years. This means that we will be subject to greater risk (other things being equal) than an entity investing solely in shorter-term securities.
Because we may borrow to fund our investments, a portion of our net investment income may be dependent upon the difference between the interest rate at which we borrow funds and the interest rate at which we invest these funds. A portion of our investments will have fixed interest rates, while a portion of our borrowings will likely have floating interest rates. As a result, a significant change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds could increase, which would reduce our net investment income. We may hedge against such interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts, subject to applicable legal requirements, including without limitation, all necessary registrations (or exemptions from registration) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged borrowings. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There are significant potential conflicts of interest which could adversely impact our investment returns.
Our executive officers and directors, and the members of our investment adviser, serve or may serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or a related line of business as we do or of investment funds managed by our affiliates. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. For example, Christian L. Oberbeck, our chief executive officer and managing member of our investment adviser, is the managing partner of Saratoga Partners, a middle market private equity investment firm. In addition, the principals of our investment adviser may manage other funds which may from time to time have overlapping investment objectives with those of us and accordingly invest in, whether principally or secondarily, asset classes similar to those targeted by us. If this should occur, the principals of our investment adviser will face conflicts of interest in the allocation of investment opportunities to us and such other funds. Although our investment professionals will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, we and our common stockholders could be adversely affected in the event investment opportunities are allocated among us and other investment vehicles managed or sponsored by, or affiliated with, our executive officers, directors and investment adviser, and the members of our investment adviser.
26
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations, or changes in the interpretation thereof, and any failure by us to comply with laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business.
We are subject to regulation at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to time. Any change in these laws or regulations, or their interpretation, or any failure by us to comply with these laws or regulations may adversely affect our business.
We are dependent on information systems and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay dividends.
Our business is dependent on our and third parties communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities. Our financial, accounting, data processing, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control and adversely affect our business. There could be:
| sudden electrical or telecommunications outages; |
| natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes; |
| disease pandemics; |
| events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts; and |
| cyber-attacks. |
These events, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our business, results of operations or financial condition.
A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen information, misappropriation of assets, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our business relationships. Any such attack could result in significant losses, reputational damage, litigation, regulatory fines or penalties, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures and to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from operational and security risks. We face risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those provided to us by third-party service providers. We, our Adviser and its affiliates have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls to help mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber incident, may be ineffective and do not guarantee that a cyber incident will not occur or that our financial results, operations or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.
Third parties with which we do business (including those that provide services to us) may also be sources or targets of cybersecurity or other technological risks. We outsource certain functions and these relationships allow for the storage and processing of our information and assets, as well as certain investor, counterparty, employee and borrower information. While we engage in actions to reduce our exposure resulting from outsourcing,
27
ongoing threats may result in unauthorized access, loss, exposure or destruction of data, or other cybersecurity incidents, with increased costs and other consequences, including those described above. Privacy and information security laws and regulation changes, and compliance with those changes, may also result in cost increases due to system changes and the development of new administrative processes.
Regulations governing our operation as a BDC will affect our ability to raise additional capital.
Our business requires a substantial amount of additional capital. We may acquire additional capital from the issuance of senior securities or other indebtedness or the issuance of additional shares of our common stock. However, we may not be able to raise additional capital in the future on favorable terms or at all. We may issue debt securities or preferred securities, which we refer to collectively as senior securities, and we may borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act.
Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200.0% after such incurrence or issuance. Our ability to issue different types of securities is also limited. Compliance with these requirements may unfavorably limit our investment opportunities and reduce our ability in comparison to other companies to profit from favorable spreads between the rates at which we can borrow and the rates at which we can lend. As a business development company, therefore, we may need to issue equity more frequently than our privately owned competitors, which may lead to greater stockholder dilution. With respect to certain types of senior securities, we must make provisions to prohibit any dividend distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of certain of our securities, unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the dividend distribution or repurchase. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy the asset coverage test. If that happens, we may be required to liquidate a portion of our investments and repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous in order to make dividend distributions or repurchase certain of our securities.
We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock if our board of directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any commission or discount). If our common stock trades at a discount to net asset value, this restriction could adversely affect our ability to raise capital. We do not currently have stockholder approval of issuances below net asset value.
Pending legislation may allow us to incur additional leverage.
As a business development company, we are generally not permitted to incur indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings of at least 200% (i.e., the amount of debt may not exceed 50% of the value of our assets). We have agreed in the covenant in the indenture governing the 2023 Notes not to violate this section of the 1940 Act, whether or not we continue to be subject to such provision, but giving effect, in either case, to any exemptive relief granted to us by the SEC. Recent legislation, if passed, would modify this section of the 1940 Act and increase the amount of debt that business development companies may incur. As a result, we may be able to incur additional indebtedness in the future.
The agreement governing our Credit Facility contains various covenants that, among other things, limits our discretion in operating our business and provides for certain minimum financial covenants.
The agreement governing the Credit Facility contains customary default provisions such as the termination or departure of certain key persons of Saratoga Investment Advisors, a material adverse change in our business and the failure to maintain certain minimum loan quality and performance standards. An event of default under
28
the facility would result, among other things, in termination of the availability of further funds under the facility and an accelerated maturity date for all amounts outstanding under the facility, which would likely disrupt our business and, potentially, the portfolio companies whose loans we financed through the facility. This could reduce our revenues and, by delaying any cash payment allowed to us under the facility until the lender has been paid in full, reduce our liquidity and cash flow and impair our ability to grow our business and maintain our status as a RIC.
Each loan origination under the facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to borrow funds under the facility at any particular time or at all.
We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we fail to qualify as a RIC.
We intend to maintain our qualification as a RIC under the Code. As a RIC, we do not pay federal income taxes on our income (including realized gains) that is distributed to our stockholders, provided that we satisfy certain source of income, distribution and asset diversification requirements.
The source of income requirement is satisfied if we derive at least 90.0% of our annual gross income from interest, dividends, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale or other disposition of securities or options thereon or foreign currencies, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such securities or currencies, and net income from interests in qualified publicly traded partnerships, as defined in the Code.
The annual distribution requirement is satisfied if we distribute to our stockholders on an annual basis an amount equal to at least 90.0% of our ordinary net taxable income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, reduced by deductible expenses. We are subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and covenants under our borrowing agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to qualify as a RIC. In such case, if we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify as a RIC and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income tax.
The diversification requirements will be satisfied if we diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year: (i) at least 50.0% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other regulated investment companies, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5.0% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and (ii) no more than 25.0% of the value of our assets is invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other regulated investment companies, of one issuer or of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or in certain publicly traded partnerships.
Failure to meet these tests may result in our having to (i) dispose of certain investments quickly or (ii) raise additional capital to prevent the loss of our RIC qualification. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If we raise additional capital to satisfy the asset diversification requirements, it could take us time to invest such capital. During this period, we will invest the additional capital in temporary investments, such as cash and cash equivalents, which we expect will earn yields substantially lower than the interest income that we anticipate receiving in respect of investments in leveraged loans and mezzanine debt.
If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason, all of our taxable income will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates. The resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution to our common stockholders or payment of our outstanding indebtedness including the 2023 Notes. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
29
Because we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our income to our stockholders in connection with our election to be treated as a RIC, we will continue to need additional capital to finance our growth. If additional funds are unavailable or not available on favorable terms, our ability to grow will be impaired.
In order to qualify for the tax benefits available to RICs and to minimize corporate-level taxes, we intend to distribute to our stockholders between 90% and 100% of our annual taxable income, except that we may retain certain net capital gains for investment, and treat such amounts as deemed distributions to our stockholders. If we elect to treat any amounts as deemed distributions, we must pay income taxes at the corporate rate on such deemed distributions on behalf of our stockholders. As a result of these requirements, we will likely need to raise capital from other sources to grow our business. As a BDC, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets, less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to total senior securities, which includes all of our borrowings and any outstanding preferred stock, of at least 200%. These requirements limit the amount that we may borrow. Because we will continue to need capital to grow our investment portfolio, these limitations may prevent us from incurring debt and require us to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so.
While we expect to be able to borrow and to issue additional debt and equity securities, we cannot assure you that debt and equity financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. Also, as a BDC, we generally are not permitted to issue equity securities priced below net asset value without stockholder approval. If additional funds are not available to us, we could be forced to curtail or cease new investment activities, and our net asset value and share price could decline.
We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash in respect of such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not receive a corresponding payment in cash. For example, we may on occasion hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with payment-in-kind interest (PIK) or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or issued with warrants) and we must include in income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We may also have to include in income other amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as deferred loan origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan or are paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock. In addition, we may be required to accrue for federal income tax purposes amounts attributable to our investment in Saratoga CLO, a collateralized loan obligation fund, that may differ from the distributions paid in respect of our investment in the subordinated notes of such collateralized loan obligation fund because of the factors set forth above or because distributions on the subordinated notes are contractually required to be diverted for reinvestment or to pay down outstanding indebtedness.
Because any original issue discount or other amounts accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our stockholders in order to satisfy the annual distribution requirement, even though we will not have received any corresponding cash amount. As a result, we may have difficulty meeting the annual distribution requirement necessary to obtain and maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code. We may have to sell some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax.
Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.
Because we have elected to be treated as a BDC, we are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with certain of our affiliates without the prior approval of our independent directors and, in
30
some cases, the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5.0% or more of our outstanding voting securities is our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any securities (other than our securities) from or to such affiliate, absent the prior approval of our independent directors. The 1940 Act also prohibits certain joint transactions with certain of our affiliates, which could include investments in the same portfolio company, without prior approval of our independent directors and, in some cases, the SEC. If a person acquires more than 25.0% of our voting securities, we are prohibited from buying or selling any security (other than any security of which we are the issuer) from or to such person or certain of that persons affiliates, or entering into prohibited joint transactions with such person, absent the prior approval of the SEC. Similar restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our officers, directors or investment adviser or their affiliates. As a result of these restrictions, we may be prohibited from buying or selling any security (other than any security of which we are the issuer) from or to any portfolio company of a private equity fund managed by our investment adviser without the prior approval of the SEC, which may limit the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us.
We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.
A number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make in private middle market companies. We compete with other BDCs, public and private funds (including SBICs), commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies, insurance companies, high-yield investors, hedge funds, and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments that could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC. As a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to identify and make investments that meet our investment objective.
We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer and we believe that some of our competitors may make loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than the rates we offer.
We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors pricing, terms and structure. If we match our competitors pricing, terms and structure, we may experience decreased net interest income and increased risk of credit loss. As a result of operating in such a competitive environment, we may make investments that are on better terms to our portfolio companies than we originally anticipated, which may impact our return on these investments.
Economic recessions or downturns could impair the ability of our portfolio companies to repay loans and harm our operating results.
Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our debt investments during these periods. Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during these periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of collateral securing some of our debt investments and the value of our equity investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us from adding to our investment portfolio, cause us to receive a reduced level of interest income from our portfolio companies and/or reduce the fair market value of our investments. Any of the foregoing events could adversely affect our distributable income and have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
31
We are a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, and therefore we are not limited with respect to the proportion of our assets that may be invested in securities of a single issuer.
We are classified as a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, which means that we are not limited by the 1940 Act with respect to the proportion of our assets that we may invest in securities of a single issuer. Although we seek to maintain a diversified portfolio in accordance with our business strategies, to the extent that we assume large positions in the securities of a small number of issuers, our net asset value may fluctuate to a greater extent than that of a diversified investment company as a result of changes in the financial condition or the markets assessment of the issuer. We may also be more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence than a diversified investment company. Beyond our RIC asset diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies.
Our financial condition and results of operations depend on our ability to manage future investments effectively.
Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our ability to acquire suitable investments and monitor and administer those investments, which depends, in turn, on Saratoga Investment Advisors ability to identify, invest in and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria.
Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of Saratoga Investment Advisors structuring of the investment process and its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient service to us. Our executive officers and the officers and employees of Saratoga Investment Advisors have substantial responsibilities in connection with their roles at Saratoga Partners as well as responsibilities under the Management Agreement. They may also be called upon to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. These demands on their time, which will increase as the number of investments grow, may distract them or slow the rate of investment. In order to grow, Saratoga Investment Advisors may need to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. However, we cannot assure you that any such employees will contribute to the work of Saratoga Investment Advisors. Any failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including the interest rate payable on the debt investments we make, the default rate on such investments, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses changes in our portfolio composition, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods. In addition, any of these factors could negatively impact our ability to achieve our investment objectives, which may cause the net asset value of our common stock to decline.
Substantially all of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as approved in good faith by our board of directors; such valuations are inherently uncertain and may be materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.
Substantially all of our portfolio is, and we expect will continue to be, comprised of investments that are not publicly traded. The value of investments that are not publicly traded may not be readily determinable. We value these investments quarterly at fair value as approved in good faith by our board of directors. Where appropriate, Saratoga Investment Advisors may utilize the services of an independent valuation firm to aid it in determining fair value. The types of factors that may be considered in valuing our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, market yield trend analysis, comparison to publicly traded
32
companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.
If we make unsecured debt investments, we may lack adequate protection in the event our portfolio companies become distressed or insolvent and will likely experience a lower recovery than more senior debtholders in the event our portfolio companies default on their indebtedness.
We make unsecured debt investments in portfolio companies. Unsecured debt investments are unsecured and junior to other indebtedness of the portfolio company. As a consequence, the holder of an unsecured debt investment may lack adequate protection in the event the portfolio company becomes distressed or insolvent and will likely experience a lower recovery than more senior debtholders in the event the portfolio company defaults on its indebtedness. In addition, unsecured debt investments of middle-market companies are often highly illiquid and in adverse market conditions may experience steep declines in valuation even if they are fully performing.
If we invest in the securities and other obligations of distressed or bankrupt companies, such investments may be subject to significant risks, including lack of income, extraordinary expenses, uncertainty with respect to satisfaction of debt, lower-than expected investment values or income potentials and resale restrictions.
We are authorized to invest in the securities and other obligations of distressed or bankrupt companies. At times, distressed debt obligations may not produce income and may require us to bear certain extraordinary expenses (including legal, accounting, valuation and transaction expenses) in order to protect and recover our investment. Therefore, to the extent we invest in distressed debt, our ability to achieve current income may be diminished which may affect our ability to make distributions on our common stock or make interest and principal payments of the 2023 Notes.
We also will be subject to significant uncertainty as to when and in what manner and for what value the distressed debt we invest in will eventually be satisfied (e.g., through a liquidation of the obligors assets, an exchange offer or plan of reorganization involving the distressed debt securities or a payment of some amount in satisfaction of the obligation). In addition, even if an exchange offer is made or plan of reorganization is adopted with respect to distressed debt held by us, there can be no assurance that the securities or other assets received by us in connection with such exchange offer or plan of reorganization will not have a lower value or income potential than may have been anticipated when the investment was made.
Moreover, any securities received by us upon completion of an exchange offer or plan of reorganization may be restricted as to resale. As a result of our participation in negotiations with respect to any exchange offer or plan of reorganization with respect to an issuer of distressed debt, we may be restricted from disposing of such securities if we are in possession of material non-public information relating to the issuer.
Second priority liens on collateral securing loans that we make to our portfolio companies may be subject to control by senior creditors with first priority liens. If there is a default, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full both the first priority creditors and us.
Certain loans that we make to portfolio companies will be secured on a second priority basis by the same collateral securing senior secured debt of such companies. The first priority liens on the collateral will secure the portfolio companys obligations under any outstanding senior debt and may secure certain other future debt that may be permitted to be incurred by the company under the agreements governing the loans. The holders of obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral will generally control the liquidation of and be entitled to receive proceeds from any realization of the collateral to repay their obligations in full before us. In
33
addition, the value of the collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by the second priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral. If such proceeds are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the loan obligations secured by the second priority liens, then we, to the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the companys remaining assets, if any.
The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing the loans we make to our portfolio companies with senior debt outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more intercreditor agreements that we enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an intercreditor agreement, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions that may be taken with respect to the collateral will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first priority liens: the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against the collateral; the ability to control the conduct of such proceedings; the approval of amendments to collateral documents; releases of liens on the collateral; and waivers of past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if our rights are adversely affected.
The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.
We primarily make investments in private companies. A portion of these securities may be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale, transfer, pledge or other disposition or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a business entity to the extent that we or our investment adviser has or could be deemed to have material non-public information regarding such business entity.
The debt securities in which we invest are subject to credit risk and prepayment risk.
An issuer of a debt security may be unable to make interest payments and repay principal. We could lose money if the issuer of a debt obligation is, or is perceived to be, unable or unwilling to make timely principal and/or interest payments, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The downgrade of a security by rating agencies may further decrease its value.
Certain debt instruments may contain call or redemption provisions which would allow the issuer thereof to prepay principal prior to the debt instruments stated maturity. This is known as prepayment risk. Prepayment risk is greater during a falling interest rate environment as issuers can reduce their cost of capital by refinancing higher interest debt instruments with lower interest debt instruments. An issuer may also elect to refinance their debt instruments with lower interest debt instruments if the credit standing of the issuer improves. To the extent debt securities in our portfolio are called or redeemed, we may receive less than we paid for such security and we may be forced to reinvest in lower yielding securities or debt securities of issuers of lower credit quality.
Our investment in Saratoga CLO constitutes a leveraged investment in a portfolio of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans and is subject to additional risks and volatility.
At November 30, 2016, our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO, a collateralized loan obligation fund, had a fair value of $11.0 million and constituted 4.0% of our portfolio. This investment constitutes a first loss position in a portfolio that, as of November 30, 2016, was composed of $297.5 million in aggregate principal amount of primarily senior secured first lien term loans and $16.0 million in uninvested cash. A first loss position means that we will suffer the first economic losses if the value of Saratoga CLO decreases. First loss positions typically carry a higher risk and earn a higher yield. Interest payments generated from this
34
portfolio will be used to pay the administrative expenses of Saratoga CLO and interest on the debt issued by Saratoga CLO before paying a return on the subordinated notes. Principal payments will be similarly applied to pay administrative expenses of Saratoga CLO and for reinvestment or repayment of Saratoga CLO debt before paying a return on, or repayment of, the subordinated notes. In addition, 80.0% of our fixed management fee and 100.0% our incentive management fee for acting as the collateral manager of Saratoga CLO is subordinated to the payment of interest and principal on Saratoga CLO debt. Any losses on the portfolio will accordingly reduce the cash flow available to pay these management fees and provide a return on, or repayment of, our investment. Depending on the amount and timing of such losses, we may experience smaller than expected returns and, potentially, the loss of our entire investment.
As the manager of the portfolio of Saratoga CLO we will have some ability to direct the composition of the portfolio, but our discretion is limited by the terms of the debt issued by Saratoga CLO which may limit our ability to make investments that we feel are in the best interests of the subordinated notes, and the availability of suitable investments. The performance of Saratoga CLOs portfolio is also subject to many of the same risks sets forth in this prospectus with respect to portfolio investments in leveraged loans.
In the event that a bankruptcy court orders the substantive consolidation of us with Saratoga CLO, the creditors of Saratoga CLO, including the holders of $282.4 million aggregate principal amount of debt, as of November 30, 2016 issued by Saratoga CLO, would have claims against the consolidated bankruptcy estate, which would include our assets.
We believe that we have observed and will observe certain formalities and operating procedures that are generally recognized requirements for maintaining our separate existence and that our assets and liabilities can be readily identified as distinct from those of Saratoga CLO. However, we cannot assure you that a bankruptcy court would agree in the event that we or Saratoga CLO became a debtor in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding. If a bankruptcy court concludes that substantive consolidation of us with Saratoga CLO is warranted, the creditors of Saratoga CLO, including the holders of $282.4 million aggregate principal amount of debt, as of November 30, 2016 issued by Saratoga CLO, would have claims against the consolidated bankruptcy estate. Substantive consolidation means that our assets are placed in a single bankruptcy estate with those of Saratoga CLO, rather than kept separate, and that the creditors of Saratoga CLO have a claim against that single estate (including our assets), as opposed to retaining their claims against only Saratoga CLO.
Our investments in Saratoga CLO are typically broadly syndicated loans that have a different risk profile than would direct investments made by us, including less information available and fewer rights regarding repayment compared to companies we invest in directly as well as complicated accounting and tax implications.
Due to our investments in the Saratoga CLO being primarily broadly syndicated loans, there may be less information available to us on those companies as compared to most investments that we make directly. For example, we will typically have fewer rights relating to how such companies manage their cash flow to repay debt, the inclusion of protective covenants, default penalties, lien protection, change of control provisions and board observation rights in deal terms, and our general ability to oversee the companys operations. Our investment in Saratoga CLO is also subject to the risk of leverage associated with the debt issued by Saratoga CLO and the repayment priority of senior debt holders in Saratoga CLO.
The accounting and tax implications of such investments are complicated. In particular, reported earnings from the equity tranche investment of Saratoga CLO are recorded under GAAP based upon an effective yield calculation. Current taxable earnings on these investments, however, will generally not be determinable until after the end of the fiscal year of Saratoga CLO that ends within the Companys fiscal year, even though the investment is generating cash flow. In general, the tax treatment of investment in Saratoga CLO may result in higher distributable earnings in the early years and a capital loss at maturity, while for reporting purposes the totality of cash flows are reflected in a constant yield to maturity.
35
The senior loan portfolio of Saratoga CLO is concentrated in a limited number of industries or borrowers, which may subject Saratoga CLO, and in turn us, to a risk of significant loss if there is a downturn in a particular industry in which Saratoga CLO is concentrated.
Saratoga CLO has senior loan portfolios that are concentrated in a limited number of industries or borrowers. A downturn in any particular industry or borrower in which Saratoga CLO is heavily invested may subject Saratoga CLO, and in turn us, to a risk of significant loss and could significantly impact the aggregate returns we realize. If an industry in which Saratoga CLO is heavily invested suffers from adverse business or economic conditions, a material portion of our investment in Saratoga CLO could be affected adversely, which, in turn, could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. For example, as of November 30, 2016, Saratoga CLOs investments in the business services industry represented approximately 14.2% of the fair value of Saratoga CLOs portfolio. Companies in the business services industry are subject to general economic downturns and business cycles, and will often suffer reduced revenues and rate pressures during periods of economic uncertainty. In addition, investments in the healthcare & pharmaceuticals industry represented approximately 10.6% of the fair value of Saratoga CLOs portfolio. Changes in healthcare or other laws and regulations applicable to the businesses of some of the companies in which Saratoga CLO invests may occur that could increase their compliance and other costs of doing business, require significant systems enhancements, or render their products or services less profitable or obsolete, any of which could have a material adverse effect on their results of operations. There has also been an increased political and regulatory focus on healthcare laws in recent years, and new legislation could have a material effect on the business and operations of companies in which Saratoga CLO invests.
The application of the risk retention rules to CLOs may have broader effects on the CLO and loan markets in general, potentially resulting in fewer or less desirable investment opportunities for Saratoga CLO.
Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act added a provision to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requiring the seller, sponsor or securitizer of a securitization vehicle to retain no less than five percent of the credit risk in assets it sells into a securitization and prohibits such securitizer from directly or indirectly hedging or otherwise transferring the retained credit risk. The responsible federal agencies adopted final rules implementing these restrictions on October 22, 2014. These rules will become effective with respect to CLOs two years after publication in the Federal Register. Under the final rules, the asset manager of a CLO would be considered the sponsor of a securitization vehicle and would be required to retain five percent of the credit risk in the CLO, which may be retained horizontally in the equity tranche of the CLO or vertically as a five percent interest in each tranche of the securities issued by the CLO. Although the final rules contain an exemption from such requirements for the asset manager of a CLO if, among other things, the originator or lead arranger of all of the loans acquired by the CLO retain such risk at the asset level and, at origination of such asset, takes a loan tranche of at least 20% of the aggregate principal balance, it is possible that the originators and lead arrangers of loans in this market will not agree to assume this risk or provide such retention at origination of the asset in a manner that would provide meaningful relief from the risk retention requirements for CLO managers.
We believe that the U.S. risk retention requirements imposed for CLO managers under Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act has created some uncertainty in the market in regard to future CLO issuance. Given that certain CLO managers may require capital provider partners to satisfy this requirement beginning on December 24, 2016, we believe that this may create additional opportunities (and additional risks) for us in the future.
Failure by Saratoga CLO to satisfy certain financial covenants may entitle senior debtholders to additional payments, which may harm our operating results by reducing payments we would otherwise be entitled to receive from Saratoga CLO.
The failure by Saratoga CLO to satisfy certain financial covenants, specifically those with respect to adequate collateralization and/or interest coverage tests, could lead to a reduction in its payments to us. In the event that Saratoga CLO failed these certain tests, senior debt holders may be entitled to additional payments that
36
would, in turn, reduce the payments we would otherwise be entitled to receive. Separately, we may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with Saratoga CLO or any other investment we may make. If any of these occur, it could materially and adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.
Available information about privately held companies is limited.
We invest primarily in privately-held companies. Generally, little public information exists about these companies, and we are required to rely on the ability of our investment advisers investment professionals to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from investing in these companies. These companies and their financial information are not subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rules that govern public companies. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments.
When we are a debt or minority equity investor in a portfolio company, we may not be in a position to control the entity, and its management may make decisions that could decrease the value of our investment.
We make both debt and minority equity investments; therefore, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree, and the stockholders and management of such company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.
Our portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.
Our portfolio companies usually will have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt, or issue other equity securities that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments. By their terms, such instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to receive payment of dividends, interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of our investments. These debt instruments will usually prohibit the portfolio companies from paying interest on or repaying our investments in the event and during the continuance of a default under such debt. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying such holders, the portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debtor ranking equally with our investments, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other holders in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company.
There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.
If one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though we may have structured our interest as senior debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. In addition, lenders can be subject to lender liability claims for actions taken by them where they become too involved in the borrowers business or exercise control over the borrower. It is possible that we could become subject to a lenders liability claim, including as a result of actions taken if we actually render significant managerial assistance.
Investments in equity securities involve a substantial degree of risk.
We purchase common stock and other equity securities. Although equity securities have historically generated higher average total returns than fixed-income securities over the long-term, equity securities also have experienced significantly more volatility in those returns and in recent years have significantly underperformed
37
relative to fixed-income securities. The equity securities we acquire may fail to appreciate and may decline in value or become worthless and our ability to recover our investment will depend on our portfolio companys success. Investments in equity securities involve a number of significant risks, including:
| any equity investment we make in a portfolio company could be subject to further dilution as a result of the issuance of additional equity interests and to serious risks as a junior security that will be subordinate to all indebtedness or senior securities in the event that the issuer is unable to meet its obligations or becomes subject to a bankruptcy process; |
| to the extent that the portfolio company requires additional capital and is unable to obtain it, we may not recover our investment in equity securities; and |
| in some cases, equity securities in which we invest will not pay current dividends, and our ability to realize a return on our investment, as well as to recover our investment, will be dependent on the success of our portfolio companies. Even if the portfolio companies are successful, our ability to realize the value of our investment may be dependent on the occurrence of a liquidity event, such as a public offering or the sale of the portfolio company. It is likely to take a significant amount of time before a liquidity event occurs or we can sell our equity investments. In addition, the equity securities we receive or invest in may be subject to restrictions on resale during periods in which it could be advantageous to sell. |
There are special risks associated with investing in preferred securities, including:
| preferred securities may include provisions that permit the issuer, at its discretion, to defer distributions for a stated period without any adverse consequences to the issuer. If we own a preferred security that is deferring its distributions, we may be required to report income for tax purposes even though we have not received any cash payments in respect of such income; |
| preferred securities are subordinated with respect to corporate income and liquidation payments, and are therefore subject to greater risk than debt; |
| preferred securities may be substantially less liquid than many other securities, such as common securities or U.S. government securities; and |
| preferred security holders generally have no voting rights with respect to the issuing company, subject to limited exceptions. |
Our investments in foreign debt, including that of emerging market issuers, may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.
Although there are limitations on our ability to invest in foreign debt, we may, from time to time, invest in debt of foreign companies, including the debt of emerging market issuers. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility. Investments in the debt of emerging market issuers may subject us to additional risks such as inflation, wage and price controls, and the imposition of trade barriers. Furthermore, economic conditions in emerging market countries are, to some extent, influenced by economic and securities market conditions in other emerging market countries. Although economic conditions are different in each country, investors reaction to developments in one country can have effects on the debt of issuers in other countries.
Although most of our investments will be U.S. dollar-denominated, our investments that are denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term
38
opportunities for investment and capital appreciation, and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we cannot assure you that we will fully hedge against these risks or that such strategies will be effective. As a result, a change in currency exchange rates may adversely affect our profitability.
We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.
We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Use of these hedging instruments may expose us to counter-party credit risk. Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is generally anticipated at an acceptable price.
The success of our hedging transactions will depend on our ability to correctly predict movements in currencies and interest rates. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities is likely to fluctuate as a result of factors not entirely related to currency fluctuations. To the extent we engage in hedging transactions, we also face the risk that counterparties to the derivative instruments we hold may default, which may expose us to unexpected losses from positions where we believed that our risk had been appropriately hedged.
Our board of directors may change our investment objective, operating policies and strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse.
Our board of directors has the authority to modify or waive our current investment objective, operating policies and strategies without prior notice and without stockholder approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies and strategies would have on our business, financial condition, and value of our common stock. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay dividends and cause you to lose all or part of your investment.
We have limited experience in managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA regulations, resulting from our lack of experience or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on our operations.
On March 28, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC, LP, received a license from the SBA to operate as an SBIC under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 and is regulated by the SBA.
The SBA places certain limitations on the financing terms of investments by SBICs in portfolio companies and prohibits SBICs from providing funds for certain purposes or to businesses in a few prohibited industries. Compliance with SBIC requirements may cause our SBIC subsidiary to forego attractive investment opportunities that are not permitted under SBA regulations.
Further, SBA regulations require that an SBIC be periodically examined and audited by the SBA to determine its compliance with the relevant SBA regulations. The SBA prohibits, without prior SBA approval, a
39
change of control of an SBIC or transfers that would result in any person (or a group of persons acting in concert) owning 10% or more of a class of capital stock of an SBIC. If our SBIC subsidiary fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit its use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit it from making new investments. In addition, the SBA can revoke or suspend a license for willful or repeated violation of, or willful or repeated failure to observe, any provision of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 or any rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. These actions by the SBA would, in turn, negatively affect us because our SBIC subsidiary is our wholly-owned subsidiary. We do not have any prior experience managing an SBIC. Our lack of experience in complying with SBA regulations may hinder our ability to take advantage of our SBIC subsidiarys access to SBA-guaranteed debentures.
Any failure to comply with SBA regulations could have an adverse effect on our operations.
Our investments may be risky, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Substantially all of our debt investments hold a non-investment grade rating by one or more rating agencies (which non-investment grade debt is commonly referred to as high yield and junk debt) or, where not rated by any rating agency, would be below investment grade or junk, if rated. A below investment grade or junk rating means that, in the rating agencys view, there is an increased risk that the obligor on such debt will be unable to pay interest and repay principal on its debt in full. We also invest in debt that defers or pays PIK interest. To the extent interest payments associated with such debt are deferred, such debt will be subject to greater fluctuations in value based on changes in interest rates, such debt could produce taxable income without a corresponding cash payment to us, and since we generally do not receive any cash prior to maturity of the debt, the investment will be of greater risk.
In addition, private middle market companies in which we invest are exposed to a number of significant risks, including:
| limited financial resources and an inability to meet their obligations, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any guarantees we may have obtained in connection with our investment; |
| shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns; |
| dependence on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of which could have a material adverse impact on the company and, in turn, on us; |
| less predictable operating results and, possibly, substantial additional capital requirements to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position; and |
| difficulty accessing the capital markets to meet future capital needs. |
In addition, our executive officers, directors and our investment adviser may, in the ordinary course of business, be named as defendants in litigation arising from our investments in the portfolio companies.
Our independent auditors have not assessed our internal control over financial reporting. If our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, it could have a material adverse effect on our stock price and our ability to raise capital.
Because we are a non-accelerated filer within the meaning of Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our independent auditors are not required to assess our internal control over financial reporting or to provide a report thereon. Although our management determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at August 31, 2016 (the last date that such determination was required to be made by us), there can be no assurance that our independent auditors would agree with our managements conclusion. Furthermore, if our
40
market capitalization, excluding affiliated stockholders, at August 31 of any fiscal year is greater than $75 million, then we will be required to obtain independent auditor certification on the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting for that fiscal year. If our internal control over financial reporting is determined in the future to not be effective, whether by our management or by our independent auditors, there could be an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our consolidated financial statements, which could materially adversely affect our stock price and our ability to raise capital necessary to operate our business. In addition, we may be required to incur costs in improving our internal control system and hiring additional personnel.
Our portfolio may continue to be concentrated in a limited number of industries, which may subject us to a risk of significant loss if there is a downturn in a particular industry in which a number of our investments are concentrated.
Our portfolio may continue to be concentrated in a limited number of industries. A downturn in any particular industry in which we are invested could significantly impact the aggregate returns we realize.
As of November 30, 2016, our investments in the business services industry represented approximately 52.7% of the fair value of our portfolio and our investments in the healthcare industry represented approximately 10.1% of the fair value of our portfolio. In addition, we may from time to time invest a relatively significant percentage of our portfolio in industries we do not necessarily target. If an industry in which we have significant investments suffers from adverse business or economic conditions, as these industries have to varying degrees, a material portion of our investment portfolio could be affected adversely, which, in turn, could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Investing in our common stock may involve an above average degree of risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies may be highly speculative and aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our common stock may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.
We may continue to choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which case you may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash you receive.
We have in the past, and may continue to, distribute taxable dividends that are payable to our stockholders in part through the issuance of shares of our common stock. For example, on October 30, 2013, our board of directors declared a dividend of $2.65 per share to shareholders payable in cash or shares of our common stock. Under certain applicable provisions of the Code and the Treasury regulations, distributions payable in cash or in shares of stock at the election of stockholders are treated as taxable dividends. The Internal Revenue Service has issued private rulings indicating that this rule will apply even where the total amount of cash that may be distributed is limited to no more than 20.0% of the total distribution. Under these rulings, if too many stockholders elect to receive their distributions in cash, each such stockholder would receive a pro rata share of the total cash to be distributed and would receive the remainder of their distribution in shares of stock. If we decide to make any distributions consistent with these rulings that are payable in part in our stock, taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend (whether received in cash, our stock, or a combination thereof) as ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for United States federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount
41
included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in stock. In addition, if a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of our stock.
On September 24, 2014, we announced the recommencement of quarterly dividends to our stockholders. We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) that provides for reinvestment of our dividend distributions on behalf of our stockholders unless a stockholder elects to receive cash. As a result, if our board of directors authorizes, and we declare, a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not opted out of the DRIP by the dividend record date will have their cash dividends automatically reinvested into additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash dividends. We have the option to satisfy the share requirements of the DRIP through the issuance of new shares of common stock or through open market purchases of common stock by the DRIP plan administrator.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
The market price and liquidity of the market for our common stock may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include:
| significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of BDCs or other companies in our sector, which are not necessarily related to the operating performance of these companies; |
| changes in regulatory policies, accounting pronouncements or tax rules, particularly with respect to RICs, BDCs or SBICs; |
| loss of RIC qualification; |
| changes in the value of our portfolio of investments; |
| any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels expected by investors or securities analysts; |
| departure of any of Saratoga Investment Advisors key personnel; |
| operating performance of companies comparable to us; |
| general economic trends and other external factors; or |
| loss of a major funding source. |
Our business and operation could be negatively affected if we become subject to any securities litigation or shareholder activism, which could cause us to incur significant expense, hinder execution of investment strategy and impact our stock price.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a companys securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Shareholder activism, which could take many forms or arise in a variety of situations, has been increasing in the BDC space recently. While we are currently not subject to any securities litigation or shareholder activism, due to the potential volatility of our stock price and for a variety of other reasons, we may in the future become the target of securities litigation or shareholder activism. Securities litigation and shareholder activism, including potential proxy contests, could result in substantial costs and divert managements and our board of directors attention and resources from our business. Additionally, such securities litigation and shareholder activism could give rise to perceived uncertainties as to our future, adversely affect our relationships with service providers and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel. Also, we may be required to incur significant legal fees and other expenses related to
42
any securities litigation and activist shareholder matters. Further, our stock price could be subject to significant fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the events, risks and uncertainties of any securities litigation and shareholder activism.
There is a risk that you may not receive distributions or that our distributions may not grow over time.
As a BDC for 1940 Act purposes and a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we intend to make distributions out of assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders once such distributions are authorized by our board of directors and declared by us. We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash distributions or periodically increase our dividend rate. In addition, due to the asset coverage test that is applicable to us as a BDC, and provisions contained in the agreements governing our borrowings, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions. Further, if we invest a greater amount of assets in equity securities that do not pay current dividends, it could reduce the amount available for distribution.
Provisions of our governing documents and the Maryland General Corporation Law could deter future takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.
We are governed by our charter and bylaws, which we refer to as our governing documents.
Our governing documents and the Maryland General Corporation Law contain provisions that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a future transaction or change in control of us that might involve a premium price for our stockholders or otherwise be in their best interest.
Our charter provides for the classification of our board of directors into three classes of directors, serving staggered three-year terms, which may render a change of control of us or removal of our incumbent management more difficult. Furthermore, any and all vacancies on our board of directors will be filled generally only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term until a successor is elected and qualifies.
Our board of directors is authorized to create and issue new series of shares, to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of stock into one or more classes or series, including preferred stock and, without stockholder approval, to amend our charter to increase or decrease the number of shares of stock that we have authority to issue, which could have the effect of diluting a stockholders ownership interest. Prior to the issuance of shares of stock of each class or series, including any reclassified series, our board of directors is required by our governing documents to set the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each class or series of shares of stock.
Our governing documents also provide that our board of directors has the exclusive power to adopt, alter or repeal any provision of our bylaws, and to make new bylaws. The Maryland General Corporation Law also contains certain provisions that may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of us, such as:
| The Maryland Business Combination Act, which, subject to certain limitations, prohibits certain business combinations between us and an interested stockholder (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the common stock or an affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder and, thereafter, imposes special minimum price provisions and special stockholder voting requirements on these combinations; and |
| The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, which provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation (defined as shares of common stock which, when aggregated with other shares of common |
43
stock controlled by the stockholder, entitles the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a control share acquisition (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of control shares) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares of common stock. |
In addition, the provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act will not apply, however, if our board of directors adopts a resolution that any business combination between us and any other person will be exempt from the provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act. Although our board of directors has adopted such a resolution, there can be no assurance that this resolution will not be altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time. If the resolution is altered or repealed, the provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us.
As permitted by Maryland law, our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our common stock. Although our bylaws include such a provision, such a provision may also be amended or eliminated by our board of directors at any time in the future, subject to obtaining confirmation from the SEC that it does not object to us being subject to the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act.
Our common stock may trade at a discount to our net asset value per share.
Common stock of BDCs, as closed-end investment companies, frequently trade at a discount to net asset value. Our common stock has traded at a discount to our net asset value since shortly after our initial public offering. The risk that our common stock may continue to trade at a discount to our net asset value is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share may decline.
Stockholders may incur dilution if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock.
The 1940 Act prohibits us from selling shares of our common stock at a price below the current net asset value per share of such stock, with certain exceptions. One such exception is prior stockholder approval of issuances below net asset value provided that our board of directors makes certain determinations. We do not currently have stockholder approval of issuances below net asset value.
If we were to sell shares of our common stock below net asset value per share, such sales would result in an immediate dilution to the net asset value per share. This dilution would occur as a result of the sale of shares at a price below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock and a proportionately greater decrease in a stockholders interest in our earnings and assets and voting interest in us than the increase in our assets resulting from such issuance.
Because the number of shares of common stock that could be so issued and the timing of any issuance is not currently known, the actual dilutive effect cannot be predicted.
The issuance of subscription rights, warrants or convertible debt that are exchangeable for our common stock, will cause your economic interest and voting power in us to be diluted as a result of our offering of any such securities.
Stockholders who do not fully exercise rights, warrants or convertible debt issued to them in any offering of subscription rights, warrants or convertible debt to purchase our common stock should expect that they will, at the completion of the offering, own a smaller proportional economic interest and have diminished voting power in us than would otherwise be the case if they fully exercised their rights, warrants or convertible debt. We cannot state precisely the amount of any such dilution in share ownership or voting power because we do not know what proportion of the common stock would be purchased as a result of any such offering.
44
In addition, if the subscription price, warrant price or convertible debt price is less than our net asset value per share of common stock at the time of such offering, then our stockholders would experience an immediate dilution of the aggregate net asset value of their shares as a result of the offering. The amount of any such decrease in net asset value is not predictable because it is not known at this time what the subscription price, warrant price, convertible debt price or net asset value per share will be on the expiration date of such offering or what proportion of our common stock will be purchased as a result of any such offering. The risk of dilution is greater if there are multiple rights offerings. However, our board of directors will make a good faith determination that any offering of subscription rights, warrants or convertible debt would result in a net benefit to existing stockholders.
Finally, our common stockholders will bear will all costs and expenses incurred by us in connection with any proposed offering of subscription rights, warrants or convertible debt that are exchangeable for our common stock, whether or not such offering is actually completed by us.
We may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds from this offering, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.
Delays in investing the net proceeds raised in this offering may cause our performance to be worse than that of other fully invested business development companies or other lenders or investors pursuing comparable investment strategies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify any investments that meet our investment objective or that any investment that we make will produce a positive return. We may be unable to invest the net proceeds of this offering on acceptable terms within the time period that we anticipate or at all, which could harm our financial condition and operating results. We anticipate that, depending on market conditions and the amount of the capital, it may take us a substantial period of time to invest substantially all of the net proceeds from this offering in investments meeting our investment objective. During this period, we will invest the capital primarily in cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment. These securities may earn yields substantially lower than the income that we anticipate receiving once we are fully invested in accordance with our investment objective.
45
We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from the sale of our securities to make investments in middle-market companies in accordance with our investment objective and strategies described in this prospectus, and for general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to reduce any of our outstanding borrowings.
We anticipate that substantially all of the net proceeds from any offering of our securities will be used as described above within six to twelve months. Pending such use, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in high quality, short-term debt securities consistent with our business development company election and our election to be taxed as a RIC. See RegulationBusiness Development Company RegulationsTemporary Investments. Our ability to achieve our investment objective may be limited to the extent that the net proceeds from an offering, pending full investment, are held in interest-bearing deposits or other short-term instruments. See Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our Business and StructureWe may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds from an offering of our securities on acceptable terms within an attractive timeframe for additional information regarding this matter. The supplement to this prospectus relating to an offering will more fully identify the use of proceeds from such an offering.
46
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
For the nine months ended November 30, 2016, and the fiscal years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015, 2014 and 2013, February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011 and 2010, the ratios of earnings to fixed charges of the Company, computed as set forth below, were as follows:
Nine months ended November 30, 2016 |
Year ended February 29, 2016 |
Year ended February 28, 2015 |
Year ended February 28, 2014 |
Year ended February 28, 2013 |
Year ended February 29, 2012 |
Year ended February 28, 2011 |
Year ended February 28, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings to Fixed Charges |
2.43 | 2.39 | 2.53 | 2.40 | 6.53 | 10.87 | 7.41 | (1.55 | ) |
For purposes of computing the ratios of earnings to fixed charges, earnings represent net increase in net assets resulting from operations plus (or minus) income tax provision (benefit) including excise tax expense plus fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest and credit facility fees and amortization of deferred financing fees.
47
NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this prospectus contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking information due to the factors discussed in the section entitled Risk Factors.
The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us or are within our control. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:
| our future operating results; |
| our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies; |
| the impact of investments that we expect to make; |
| our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties; |
| the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest; |
| the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives; |
| our expected financings and investments; |
| our regulatory structure and tax treatment, including our ability to operate as a business development company, a regulated investment company and a small business investment company; |
| the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; |
| the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies; and |
| the ability of our investment adviser to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and effectively administer our investments. |
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made in this prospectus relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this prospectus.
You should understand that, under Sections 27A(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Act and Section 21E(b)(2)B of the Exchange Act, the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 do not apply to statements made in connection with any offering of securities pursuant to this prospectus. Any forward-looking statements contained in any reports that the Company may file under the Exchange Act will be excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 21E of the Exchange Act.
48
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol SAR. Prior to July 30, 2010, our common stock traded on the NYSE under the symbol GNV. The following table lists the high and low closing sales prices for the Companys common stock and such closing sales prices percentage of premium or discount to NAV for the last four completed fiscal years and the current fiscal year to date. On March 9, 2017, the last reported closing sale price of our common stock was $23.27 per share which represents a discount of approximately 0.0% to the NAV reported as of November 30, 2016.
Price Range | ||||||||||||||||||||
NAV(1) | High | Low | Percentage of High Sales Price as a Premium (Discount) to NAV(2) |
Percentage of Low Sales Price as a Premium (Discount) to NAV(2) |
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year ending February 28, 2018 |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter (through March 9, 2017) |
* | $ | 23.45 | $ | 22.87 | * | * | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Year ended February 28, 2017 |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 22.11 | $ | 16.84 | $ | 14.03 | (23.8 | )% | (36.5 | )% | ||||||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 23.39 | $ | 18.15 | $ | 16.37 | (18.9 | )% | (26.9 | )% | ||||||||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 22.21 | $ | 20.24 | $ | 17.20 | (8.9 | )% | (22.6 | )% | ||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
|
* |
|
$ |
23.30 |
|
$ |
18.12 |
|
* | |
* |
| |||||||
Fiscal Year ended February 29, 2016 |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 22.75 | $ | 19.95 | $ | 15.28 | (12.3 | )% | (32.8 | )% | ||||||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 22.42 | $ | 17.68 | $ | 16.83 | (21.1 | )% | (24.9 | )% | ||||||||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 22.59 | $ | 16.65 | $ | 14.92 | (26.3 | )% | (34.0 | )% | ||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 22.06 | $ | 15.93 | $ | 13.50 | (27.8 | )% | (38.8 | )% | ||||||||||
Fiscal Year ended February 28, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 21.41 | $ | 15.91 | $ | 15.05 | (25.7 | )% | (29.7 | )% | ||||||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 22.00 | $ | 16.26 | $ | 15.15 | (26.1 | )% | (31.1 | )% | ||||||||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 22.45 | $ | 16.32 | $ | 15.00 | (27.3 | )% | (33.2 | )% | ||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 22.70 | $ | 15.84 | $ | 14.44 | (30.2 | )% | (36.4 | )% | ||||||||||
Year ended February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 23.48 | $ | 19.08 | $ | 16.35 | (18.7 | )% | (30.4 | )% | ||||||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 23.55 | $ | 18.70 | $ | 17.40 | (20.6 | )% | (26.1 | )% | ||||||||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 20.39 | $ | 19.55 | $ | 15.40 | (4.1 | )% | (24.5 | )% | ||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 21.08 | $ | 16.56 | $ | 15.25 | (21.4 | )% | (27.7 | )% | ||||||||||
Year ended February 28, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 25.74 | $ | 18.29 | $ | 15.15 | (28.9 | )% | (41.1 | )% | ||||||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 26.96 | $ | 17.20 | $ | 16.50 | (36.2 | )% | (38.8 | )% | ||||||||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 21.52 | $ | 19.97 | $ | 15.17 | (7.2 | )% | (29.5 | )% | ||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 22.71 | $ | 18.50 | $ | 15.07 | (18.5 | )% | (33.6 | )% | ||||||||||
Year ended February 28, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 27.89 | $ | 18.26 | $ | 16.69 | (34.5 | )% | (40.2 | )% | ||||||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 27.33 | $ | 17.26 | $ | 13.58 | (36.8 | )% | (50.3 | )% | ||||||||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 24.17 | $ | 13.82 | $ | 12.35 | (42.8 | )% | (48.9 | )% | ||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 24.94 | $ | 16.15 | $ | 12.07 | (35.2 | )% | (51.6 | )% |
* | Net asset value has not yet been calculated for this period. |
(1) | Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset value per share on the date of the high and low sales prices. The net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at the end of each period. |
(2) | Calculated as the respective high or low sales price less net asset value, divided by net asset value. |
49
Holders
The last reported price for our common stock on March 9, 2017 was $23.27 per share. As of February 24, 2017, there were 21 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividend Policy
The following table summarizes our dividends or distributions declared during fiscal 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017:
Date Declared |
Record Date | Payment Date | Amount per Share |
|||||||||
May 22, 2008 |
May 30, 2008 | June 13, 2008 | $ | 3.90 | ||||||||
August 19, 2008 |
August 29, 2008 | September 15, 2008 | $ | 3.90 | ||||||||
December 8, 2008 |
December 18, 2008 | December 29, 2008 | $ | 2.50 | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2009 |
$ | 10.30 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
November 13, 2009 |
November 25, 2009 | December 31, 2009 | $ | 18.25 | (1) | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2010 |
$ | 18.25 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
November 12, 2010 |
November 19, 2010 | December 29, 2010 | $ | 4.40 | (1) | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2011 |
$ | 4.40 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
November 15, 2011 |
November 25, 2011 | December 30, 2011 | $ | 3.00 | (1) | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2012 |
$ | 3.00 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
November 9, 2012 |
November 20, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | $ | 4.25 | (1) | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2013 |
$ | 4.25 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
October 30, 2013 |
November 13, 2013 | December 27, 2013 | $ | 2.65 | (1) | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2014 |
$ | 2.65 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
September 24, 2014 |
November 3, 2014 | November 28, 2014 | $ | 0.18 | (1) | |||||||
September 24, 2014 |
February 2, 2015 | February 27, 2015 | $ | 0.22 | (1) | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2015 |
$ | 0.40 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
April 9, 2015 |
May 4, 2015 | May 29, 2015 | $ | 0.27 | (1) | |||||||
May 14, 2015 |
May 26, 2015 | June 5, 2015 | $ | 1.00 | (1) | |||||||
July 8, 2015 |
August 3, 2015 | August 31, 2015 | $ | 0.33 | (1) | |||||||
October 7, 2015 |
November 2, 2015 | November 30, 2015 | $ | 0.36 | (1) | |||||||
January 12, 2015 |
February 1, 2016 | February 29, 2016 | $ | 0.40 | (1) | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2016 |
$ | 2.36 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
March 31, 2016 |
April 5, 2016 | April 27, 2016 | $ | 0.41 | (1) | |||||||
July 7, 2016 |
July 29, 2016 | August 9, 2016 | $ | 0.43 | (1) | |||||||
August 8, 2016 |
August 24, 2016 | September 5, 2016 | $ | 0.20 | (1) | |||||||
October 5, 2016 |
October 31, 2016 | November 9, 2016 | $ | 0.44 | (1) | |||||||
January 12, 2017 |
January 31, 2017 | February 9, 2017 | $ | 0.45 | ||||||||
February 28, 2017 |
March 15, 2017 | March 28, 2017 | $ | 0.46 | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Dividends Declared for Fiscal 2017 |
$ | 2.39 | ||||||||||
|
|
(1) | This dividend was paid by combination of shares of common stock and cash. Please see the discussion immediately following this table for more detail about the composition of this dividend. |
Our distributions, if any, will be determined by our board of directors and paid out of assets legally available for distribution. Any such distributions will be taxable to our stockholders, including to those stockholders who receive additional shares of our common stock pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. The reinvested dividends under our dividend reinvestment plan increase our gross assets, which will result in higher
50
management fees, and potentially income incentive fees and capital gains incentive fees payable to Saratoga Investment Advisors. Prior to January 2009, we paid quarterly dividends to our stockholders. However, in January 2009, we suspended the practice of paying quarterly dividends to our stockholders and made five dividend distributions (in December 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) to our stockholders in the form of a combination of cash and the issuance of shares of our common stock as discussed more fully below. On September 24, 2014, our board of directors adopted a new dividend policy pursuant to which we will begin to again pay a regular quarterly cash dividend to our shareholders. In this regard, as noted in the table above, our board of directors has declared a regular quarterly cash dividends to our shareholders since adopting our new dividend policy.
We are prohibited from making distributions that cause us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act, subject to certain exceptions, or that violate our debt covenants.
Prior to the adoption of our new dividend policy described above, our board of directors believed that using our capital resources to build and diversify our portfolio served our stockholders interests best by better positioning us to generate current income and capital appreciation on an increasing scale. Therefore, our board of directors determined to pay a 20.0% cash and 80.0% stock dividend with respect to a significant portion of our taxable income for our 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 fiscal years in accordance with an IRS revenue procedure or certain IRS private letter rulings. For more detailed information about these dividends, please see the discussion below.
In order to maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must for each fiscal year distribute an amount equal to at least 90.0% of our ordinary net taxable income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, reduced by deductible expenses. In addition, we will be subject to federal excise taxes to the extent we do not distribute during the calendar year at least (1) 98.0% of our ordinary income for the calendar year, (2) 98.2% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year and (3) any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years that were not distributed during such years and on which we paid no federal income tax. For the 2013 calendar year, the Company made distributions sufficient such that we did not incur any federal excise taxes. We may elect to withhold from distribution a portion of our ordinary income for the 2014 calendar year and/or portion of the capital gains in excess of capital losses realized during the one year period ending October 31, 2014, if any, and, if we do so, we would expect to incur federal excise taxes as a result.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically opt out of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends.
Pursuant to a revenue procedure (Revenue Procedure 2010-12), or the Revenue Procedure, issued by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, the IRS indicated that it would treat distributions from certain publicly traded RICs (including BDCs) that were paid part in cash and part in stock as dividends that would satisfy the RICs annual distribution requirements and qualify for the dividends paid deduction for federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify for such treatment, the Revenue Procedure required that at least 10.0% of the total distribution be payable in cash and that each stockholder have a right to elect to receive its entire distribution in cash. If too many stockholders elected to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash must receive a proportionate share of the cash to be distributed (although no stockholder electing to receive cash may receive less than 10.0% of such stockholders distribution in cash). This Revenue Procedure applied to distributions declared on or before December 31, 2012 with respect to taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2011.
Although this Revenue Procedure is no longer available and did not apply to our distributions for our fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, the revenue procedure was based upon certain applicable provisions of the Code and the Treasury regulations pursuant to which distributions payable in cash or in shares of stock at the election of stockholders are treated as taxable dividends. Consistent with these provisions, the IRS has issued private letter rulings concluding that a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC subject to a limitation on the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders, which limitation must be at least 20.0% of the aggregate declared distribution.
51
On October 30, 2013, our board of directors declared a dividend of $2.65 per share payable on December 27, 2013, to common stockholders of record on November 13, 2013. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $2.5 million or $0.53 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $2.5 million in cash and 649,500 shares of common stock, or 13.7% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 20.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.439 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 11, 13, and 16, 2013.
On November 9, 2012, our board of directors declared a dividend of $4.25 per share payable on December 31, 2012, to common stockholders of record on November 20, 2012. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $3.3 million or $0.85 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $3.3 million in cash and 853,455 shares of common stock, or 22.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 20.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.444 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 14, 17 and 19, 2012.
On November 15, 2011, our board of directors declared a dividend of $3.00 per share payable on December 30, 2011, to common stockholders of record on November 25, 2011. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to $2.0 million or $0.60 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $2.0 million in cash and 599,584 shares of common stock, or 18.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 20.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $13.12 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 20, 21 and 22, 2011.
On November 12, 2010, we declared a dividend of $4.40 per share which was paid on December 29, 2010. Stockholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to $1.2 million or $0.44 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $1.2 million in cash and 596,235 shares of common stock, or 22.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 10.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $17.8049 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 20, 21 and 22, 2010.
52
On November 13, 2009, we declared a dividend of $18.25 per share payable on December 31, 2009. Stockholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all stockholders was limited to $2.1 million or $0.25 per share.
Based on stockholder elections, the dividend consisted of $2.1 million in cash and 8,648,725 shares of common stock, or 104.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 13.7% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to stockholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $1.5099 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 24 and 28, 2009.
53
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) that provides that, unless you elect to receive your dividends or other distributions in cash, they will be automatically reinvested by the Plan Administrator, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC, in additional shares of our common stock. If you elect to receive your dividends or other distributions in cash, you will receive them in cash paid by check mailed directly to you by the Plan Administrator. The reinvestment of our distributions does not relieve stockholders of any tax that may be payable on such distributions. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, stockholders will be treated as receiving the amount of the distributions made by us, which amount generally will be either equal to the amount of the cash distribution the stockholder would have received if the stockholder had elected to receive cash or, for shares issued by us, the fair market value of the shares issued to the stockholder.
No action is required on the part of a registered stockholder to have their cash dividend reinvested in shares of our common stock. When the share price of our common stock is trading above net asset value, we intend to primarily use newly issued shares to implement the plan. However, we reserve the right to purchase shares in the open market in connection with our implementation of the plan even if the share price of our common stock is trading below net asset value. Unless you or your brokerage firm decides to opt out of the Plan, the number of shares of common stock you will receive will be determined as follows:
(1) If we use newly issued shares under the Plan, we will issue the new shares at a price equal to 95% of the average of the market prices of our common stock at the close of trading on the ten trading days immediately preceding and ending on the date fixed by our board of directors for the payment of the dividend.
(2) If we use shares purchased in the open market under the Plan, the Plan Administrator will receive the dividend or distribution in cash and will purchase common stock in the open market, on the New York Stock Exchange or elsewhere, for the participants accounts. Shares purchased in the open market will be allocated to a participant based on the average purchase price, excluding any brokerage charges or other charges, of all shares purchased with respect to the dividend.
You may withdraw from the Plan at any time by giving written notice to the Plan Administrator, or by telephone in accordance with such reasonable requirements as we and the Plan Administrator may agree upon. If you withdraw or the Plan is terminated, you will receive a certificate for each whole share in your account under the Plan and you will receive a cash payment for any fraction of a share in your account. If you wish, the Plan Administrator will sell your shares and send you the proceeds, minus brokerage commissions.
The Plan Administrator maintains all common stockholders accounts in the Plan and gives written confirmation of all transactions in the accounts, including information you may need for tax records. Common stock in your account will be held by the Plan Administrator in non-certificated form. The Plan Administrator will forward to each participant any proxy solicitation material and will vote any shares so held only in accordance with proxies returned to us. Any proxy you receive will include all common stock you have received under the Plan.
There is no brokerage charge for reinvestment of your dividends or distributions in common stock.
Automatically reinvesting dividends and distributions does not mean that you do not have to pay income taxes due upon the reinvestment of such dividends and distributions. See Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.
If you hold your common stock with a brokerage firm that does not participate in the Plan, you will not be able to participate in the Plan and any dividend reinvestment may be effected on different terms than those described above. Consult your financial advisory for more information.
54
Neither us nor the Plan Administrator nor its nominee or nominees shall be liable for any act done in good faith, or for any good faith omission to act, including without limitation, any claims of liability arising out of failure to terminate a participants account upon the participants death prior to receipt of notice in writing of such death, and with respect to the price at which shares are purchased or sold for the participants account.
The Plan Administrators fees under the Plan will be borne by us. There is no direct service charge to participants in the Plan; however, we reserve the right to amend or terminate the Plan, including amending the Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants, if in the judgment of the board of directors the change is warranted. Any amendment to the Plan, except amendments necessary or appropriate to comply with applicable law or the rules and policies of the SEC or any other regulatory authority, require us to provide at least 30 days written notice to each participant. Additional information about the Plan may be obtained from American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC, 59 Maiden Lane, New York, New York 10038.
55
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this prospectus contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking information due to the factors discussed under Risk Factors and Note about Forward-Looking Statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
OVERVIEW
We are a Maryland corporation that has elected to be treated as a Business Development Company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). Our investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation from our investments. We invest primarily in leveraged loans and mezzanine debt issued by private U.S. middle market companies, which we define as companies having EBITDA of between $2 million and $50 million, both through direct lending and through participation in loan syndicates. We may also invest up to 30.0% of the portfolio in opportunistic investments in order to seek to enhance returns to stockholders. Such investments may include investments in distressed debt, which may include securities of companies in bankruptcy, foreign debt, private equity, securities of public companies that are not thinly traded and structured finance vehicles such as collateralized loan obligation funds. On January 22, 2008, we entered into a collateral management agreement with Saratoga CLO, pursuant to which we act as its collateral manager. In addition, we purchased for $30.0 million all of the outstanding subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO. The Saratoga CLO was initially refinanced in October 2013 and its reinvestment period ended in October 2016. On November 15, 2016, we completed the second refinancing of the Saratoga CLO. The Saratoga CLO refinancing, among other things, extended its reinvestment period to October 2018, and extended its legal maturity date to October 2025. Following the refinancing, the Saratoga CLO portfolio remained at the same size and with a similar capital structure of approximately $300 million in aggregate principal amount of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. In addition to refinancing its liabilities, we also purchased $4.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the Class F notes tranche of the Saratoga CLO at par, with a coupon of 8.5%.
Although we have no current intention to do so, to the extent we invest in private equity funds, we will limit our investments in entities that are excluded from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act, which includes private equity funds, to no more than 15% of its net assets.
We have elected and qualified to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).
Corporate History and Recent Developments
We commenced operations, at the time known as GSC Investment Corp., on March 23, 2007 and completed an initial public offering of shares of common stock on March 28, 2007. Prior to July 30, 2010, we were externally managed and advised by GSCP (NJ), L.P., an entity affiliated with GSC Group, Inc. In connection with the consummation of a recapitalization transaction on July 30, 2010, as described below we engaged Saratoga Investment Advisors (SIA) to replace GSCP (NJ), L.P. as our investment adviser and changed our name to Saratoga Investment Corp.
As a result of the event of default under a revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank we previously had in place, in December 2008 we engaged the investment banking firm of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company to evaluate strategic transaction opportunities and consider alternatives for us. On April 14, 2010, GSC Investment Corp. entered into a stock purchase agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its
56
affiliates and an assignment, assumption and novation agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, pursuant to which GSC Investment Corp. assumed certain rights and obligations of Saratoga Investment Advisors under a debt commitment letter Saratoga Investment Advisors received from Madison Capital Funding LLC, which indicated Madison Capital Fundings willingness to provide GSC Investment Corp. with a $40.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, subject to the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions. In addition, GSC Investment Corp. and GSCP (NJ), L.P. entered into a termination and release agreement, to be effective as of the closing of the transaction contemplated by the stock purchase agreement, pursuant to which GSCP (NJ), L.P., among other things, agreed to waive any and all accrued and unpaid deferred incentive management fees up to and as of the closing of the transaction contemplated by the stock purchase agreement but continued to be entitled to receive the base management fees earned through the date of the closing of the transaction contemplated by the stock purchase agreement.
The Saratoga CLO remains effectively 100% owned and managed by Saratoga Investment Corp. We receive a base management fee of 0.10% and a subordinated management fee of 0.40% of the fee basis amount at the beginning of the collection period, paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee equal to 20.0% of excess cash flow to the extent the Saratoga CLO subordinated notes receive an internal rate of return paid in cash equal to or greater than 12.0%.
On July 30, 2010, the transactions contemplated by the stock purchase agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates were completed, the private sale of 986,842 shares of our common stock for $15.0 million in aggregate purchase price to Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates closed, the Company entered into the Credit Facility, and the Company began doing business as Saratoga Investment Corp.
We used the net proceeds from the private sale transaction and a portion of the funds available to us under the Credit Facility to pay the full amount of principal and accrued interest, including default interest, outstanding under our revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank. The revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank was terminated in connection with our payment of all amounts outstanding thereunder on July 30, 2010.
On August 12, 2010, we effected a one-for-ten reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock. As a result of the reverse stock split, every ten shares of our common stock were converted into one share of our common stock. Any fractional shares received as a result of the reverse stock split were redeemed for cash. The total cash payment in lieu of shares was $230. Immediately after the reverse stock split, we had 2,680,842 shares of our common stock outstanding.
In January 2011, we registered for public resale of the 986,842 shares of our common stock issued to Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates.
On March 28, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC, LP (SBIC LP), received an SBIC license from the Small Business Administration (SBA).
In May 2013, we issued $48.3 million in aggregate principal amount of our 7.50% unsecured notes due 2020 (the 2020 Notes) for net proceeds of $46.1 million after deducting underwriting commissions of $1.9 million and offering costs of $0.3 million. The proceeds included the underwriters full exercise of their overallotment option. Interest on these 2020 Notes is paid quarterly in arrears on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15, at a rate of 7.50% per year, beginning August 15, 2013. The 2020 Notes mature on May 31, 2020 and since May 31, 2016, may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option. The 2020 Notes were listed on the NYSE under the trading symbol SAQ with a par value of $25.00 per share. The 2020 Notes were redeemed in full on January 13, 2017.
On April 2, 2015, the SBA issued a green light letter inviting us to continue the application process to obtain a license to form and operate its second SBIC subsidiary. On September 27, 2016, the SBA informed us
57
that as part of their continued review of our application for a second license, and in order to ensure that they were reviewing the most current information available, we would need to update all previously submitted materials and invited us to reapply. As a result of this request, with which we are in the process of complying, the existing green light letter that the SBA issued to us has expired. If approved in the future, a second SBIC license would provide us an incremental source of long-term capital by permitting us to issue up to $150.0 million of additional SBA-guaranteed debentures in addition to the $150.0 million already approved under the first license.
On May 29, 2015, we entered into a Debt Distribution Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. through which we may offer for sale, from time to time, up to $20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Notes through an At-the-Market (ATM) offering. As of November 30, 2016, the Company sold 539,725 bonds with a principal of $13,493,125 at an average price of $25.31 for aggregate net proceeds of $13,385,766 (net of transaction costs).
On December 21, 2016, we issued $74.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our 6.75% fixed-rate notes due 2023 (the 2023 Notes) for net proceeds of $72.1 million after deducting underwriting commissions of approximately $2.0 million and offering costs of approximately $0.5 million. The issuance included the exercise of substantially all of the underwriters option to purchase an additional $9.8 million aggregate principal amount of 2023 Notes within 30 days. Interest on the 2023 Notes is paid quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15, at a rate of 6.75% per year, beginning March 30, 2017. The 2023 Notes mature on December 20, 2023, and commencing December 21, 2019, may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option. The net proceeds from the offering were used to repay all of the outstanding indebtedness under the 2020 Notes, which amounts to $61.8 million, and for general corporate purposes in accordance with our investment objective and strategies. The 2020 Notes were redeemed in full on January 13, 2017.
Critical Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions affecting amounts reported in the Companys consolidated financial statements. We have identified investment valuation, revenue recognition and the recognition of capital gains incentive fee expense as our most critical accounting estimates. We continuously evaluate our estimates, including those related to the matters described below. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A discussion of our critical accounting policies follows.
Investment Valuation
The Company accounts for its investments at fair value in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. ASC 820 requires the Company to assume that its investments are to be sold at the balance sheet date in the principal market to independent market participants, or in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market, which may be a hypothetical market. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are fair valued at such market quotations obtained from independent third party pricing services and market makers subject to any decision by our board of directors to approve a fair value determination to reflect significant events affecting the value of these investments.
58
We value investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair value as approved, in good faith, by our board of directors based on input from Saratoga Investment Advisers, the audit committee of our board of directors and a third party independent valuation firm. Determinations of fair value may involve subjective judgments and estimates. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments, market yield trend analysis, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.
We undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter when valuing investments for which market quotations are not readily available, as described below:
| Each investment is initially valued by the responsible investment professionals of Saratoga Investment Advisors and preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with our senior management; and |
| An independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors reviews a selection of these preliminary valuations each quarter so that the valuation of each investment for which market quotes are not readily available is reviewed by the independent valuation firm at least once each fiscal year. |
In addition, all our investments are subject to the following valuation process:
| The audit committee of our board of directors reviews and approves each preliminary valuation and Saratoga Investment Advisors and an independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee; and |
| Our board of directors discusses the valuations and approves the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of Saratoga Investment Advisors, independent valuation firm (to the extent applicable) and the audit committee of our board of directors. |
Our investment in Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (Saratoga CLO) is carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for equity interests in collateralized loan obligation funds similar to Saratoga CLO, when available, as determined by SIA and recommended to our board of directors. Specifically, we use Intex cash flow models, or an appropriate substitute, to form the basis for the valuation of our investment in Saratoga CLO. The models use a set of assumptions including projected default rates, recovery rates, reinvestment rate and prepayment rates in order to arrive at estimated valuations. The assumptions are based on available market data and projections provided by third parties as well as management estimates. We use the output from the Intex models (i.e., the estimated cash flows) to perform a discounted cash flow analysis on expected future cash flows to determine a valuation for our investment in Saratoga CLO.
Revenue Recognition
Income Recognition
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company stops accruing interest on its investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Discounts and premiums on investments purchased are accreted/amortized over the life of the respective investment using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on investments.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. Accrued interest is generally reserved when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest
59
payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as a reduction in principal depending upon managements judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in managements judgment, are likely to remain current, although we may make exceptions to this general rule if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection.
Interest income on our investment in Saratoga CLO is recorded using the effective interest method in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 325-40, Investments-Other, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, based on the anticipated yield and the estimated cash flows over the projected life of the investment. Yields are revised when there are changes in actual or estimated cash flows due to changes in prepayments and/or re-investments, credit losses or asset pricing. Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an adjustment to the estimated yield over the remaining life of the investment from the date the estimated yield was changed.
Payment-in-Kind Interest
The Company holds debt investments in its portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind (PIK) interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the investment balance that is generally due at maturity, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. We stop accruing PIK interest if we do not expect the issuer to be able to pay all principal and interest when due.
Capital Gains Incentive Fee
The Company records an expense accrual relating to the capital gains incentive fee payable by the Company to its investment adviser when the unrealized gains on its investments exceed all realized capital losses on its investments given the fact that a capital gains incentive fee would be owed to the investment adviser if the Company were to liquidate its investment portfolio at such time. The actual incentive fee payable to the Companys investment adviser related to capital gains will be determined and payable in arrears at the end of each fiscal year and will include only realized capital gains for the period.
Revenues
We generate revenue in the form of interest income and capital gains on the debt investments that we hold and capital gains, if any, on equity interests that we may acquire. We expect our debt investments, whether in the form of leveraged loans or mezzanine debt, to have terms of up to ten years, and to bear interest at either a fixed or floating rate. Interest on debt will be payable generally either quarterly or semi-annually. In some cases, our debt investments may provide for a portion of the interest to be PIK. To the extent interest is paid-in-kind, it will be payable through the increase of the principal amount of the obligation by the amount of interest due on the then-outstanding aggregate principal amount of such obligation. The principal amount of the debt and any accrued but unpaid interest will generally become due at the maturity date. In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, structuring or diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance or investment management services and possibly consulting fees. Any such fees will be generated in connection with our investments and recognized as earned. We may also invest in preferred equity securities that pay dividends on a current basis.
On January 22, 2008, we entered into a collateral management agreement with Saratoga CLO, pursuant to which we act as its collateral manager. The Saratoga CLO was initially refinanced in October 2013 and its reinvestment period ended in October 2016. On November 15, 2016, we completed the second refinancing of the Saratoga CLO. The Saratoga CLO refinancing, among other things, extended its reinvestment period to October 2018, and extended its legal maturity date to October 2025. Following the refinancing, the Saratoga CLO portfolio remained at the same size and with a similar capital structure of approximately $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. In addition to refinancing its
60
liabilities, we also purchased $4.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the Class F notes tranche of the Saratoga CLO at par, with a coupon of LIBOR plus 8.5%.
The Saratoga CLO remains effectively 100% owned and managed by Saratoga Investment Corp. Following the refinancing, we receive a base management fee of 0.10% and a subordinated management fee of 0.40% of the fee basis amount at the beginning of the collection period, paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee equal to 20.0% of excess cash flow to the extent the Saratoga CLO subordinated notes receive an internal rate of return paid in cash equal to or greater than 12.0%.
We recognize interest income on our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO using the effective interest method, based on the anticipated yield and the estimated cash flows over the projected life of the investment. Yields are revised when there are changes in actual or estimated cash flows due to changes in prepayments and/or re-investments, credit losses or asset pricing. Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an adjustment to the estimated yield over the remaining life of the investment from the date the estimated yield was changed.
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses include the payment of investment advisory and management fees, professional fees, directors and officers insurance, fees paid to independent directors and administrator expenses, including our allocable portion of our administrators overhead. Our investment advisory and management fees compensate our investment adviser for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing and monitoring our investments. We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including those relating to:
| organization; |
| calculating our net asset value (including the cost and expenses of any independent valuation firm); |
| expenses incurred by our investment adviser payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or other advisers, in monitoring our financial and legal affairs and in monitoring our investments and performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio companies; |
| expenses incurred by our investment adviser payable for travel and due diligence on our prospective portfolio companies; |
| interest payable on debt, if any, incurred to finance our investments; |
| offerings of our common stock and other securities; |
| investment advisory and management fees; |
| fees payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or other advisers, relating to, or associated with, evaluating and making investments; |
| transfer agent and custodial fees; |
| federal and state registration fees; |
| all costs of registration and listing our common stock on any securities exchange; |
| federal, state and local taxes; |
| independent directors fees and expenses; |
| costs of preparing and filing reports or other documents required by governmental bodies (including the SEC and the SBA); |
| costs of any reports, proxy statements or other notices to common stockholders including printing costs; |
61
| our fidelity bond, directors and officers errors and omissions liability insurance, and any other insurance premiums; |
| direct costs and expenses of administration, including printing, mailing, long distance telephone, copying, secretarial and other staff, independent auditors and outside legal costs; and |
| administration fees and all other expenses incurred by us or, if applicable, the administrator in connection with administering our business (including payments under the administration agreement based upon our allocable portion of the administrators overhead in performing its obligations under an administration agreement, including rent and the allocable portion of the cost of our officers and their respective staffs (including travel expenses)). |
Pursuant to the Management Agreement that we had with GSCP (NJ), L.P., our former investment adviser and administrator, we had agreed to pay GSCP (NJ), L.P. as investment adviser a quarterly base management fee of 1.75% of the average value of our total assets (other than cash or cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) at the end of the two most recently completed fiscal quarters and an incentive fee.
The incentive fee had two parts:
| A fee, payable quarterly in arrears, equal to 20.0% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the net assets at the end of the immediately preceding quarter, that exceeded a 1.875% quarterly hurdle rate measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. Under this provision, in any fiscal quarter, our investment adviser received no incentive fee unless our pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeded the hurdle rate of 1.875%. Amounts received as a return of capital were not included in calculating this portion of the incentive fee. Since the hurdle rate was based on net assets, a return of less than the hurdle rate on total assets could still have resulted in an incentive fee. |
| A fee, payable at the end of each fiscal year, equal to 20.0% of our net realized capital gains, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation, in each case on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of capital gains incentive fees paid to the investment adviser through such date. |
We deferred cash payment of any incentive fee otherwise earned by our former investment adviser if, during the then most recent four full fiscal quarters ending on or prior to the date such payment was to be made, the sum of (a) our aggregate distributions to our stockholders and (b) our change in net assets (defined as total assets less liabilities) (before taking into account any incentive fees payable during that period) was less than 7.5% of our net assets at the beginning of such period. These calculations were appropriately pro-rated for the first three fiscal quarters of operation and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the applicable period. Such incentive fee would become payable on the next date on which such test had been satisfied for the most recent four full fiscal quarters or upon certain terminations of the Management Agreement. We commenced deferring cash payment of incentive fees during the quarterly period ended August 31, 2007, and continued to defer such payments through the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010. As of July 30, 2010, the date on which GSCP (NJ), L.P. ceased to be our investment adviser and administrator, we owed GSCP (NJ), L.P. $2.9 million in fees for services previously provided to us; of which $0.3 million has been paid by us. GSCP (NJ), L.P. agreed to waive payment by us of the remaining $2.6 million in connection with the consummation of the stock purchase transaction with Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates described elsewhere in this Prospectus.
The terms of the Management Agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, our current investment adviser, are substantially similar to the terms of the Management Agreement we had entered into with GSCP (NJ), L.P., our former investment adviser, except for the following material distinctions in the fee terms:
| The capital gains portion of the incentive fee was reset with respect to gains and losses from May 31, 2010, and therefore losses and gains incurred prior to such time will not be taken into account when |
62
calculating the capital gains fee payable to Saratoga Investment Advisors and, as a result, Saratoga Investment Advisors will be entitled to 20.0% of net gains that arise after May 31, 2010. In addition, the cost basis for computing realized gains and losses on investments held by us as of May 31, 2010 equal the fair value of such investment as of such date. Under the Management Agreement with our former investment adviser, GSCP (NJ), L.P., the capital gains fee was calculated from March 21, 2007, and the gains were substantially outweighed by losses. |
| Under the catch up provision, 100.0% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income that exceeds 1.875% but is less than or equal to 2.344% in any fiscal quarter is payable to Saratoga Investment Advisors. This will enable Saratoga Investment Advisors to receive 20.0% of all net investment income as such amount approaches 2.344% in any quarter, and Saratoga Investment Advisors will receive 20.0% of any additional net investment income. Under the Management Agreement with our former investment adviser, GSCP (NJ), L.P. only received 20.0% of the excess net investment income over 1.875%. |
| We will no longer have deferral rights regarding incentive fees in the event that the distributions to stockholders and change in net assets is less than 7.5% for the preceding four fiscal quarters. |
To the extent that any of our leveraged loans are denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars, we may enter into currency hedging contracts to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. We may also enter into interest rate hedging agreements. Such hedging activities, which will be subject to compliance with applicable legal requirements, may include the use of interest rate caps, futures, options and forward contracts. Costs incurred in entering into or settling such contracts will be borne by us.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (ASU 2016-15), which is intended to reduce the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact ASU 2016-15 will have on the consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Amendments to the Leases (ASC Topic 842), which will require for all operating leases the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, in the statement of financial position. The lease cost will be allocated over the lease term on a straight-line basis. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the impact these changes will have on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial InstrumentsOverall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01). ASU 2016-01 retains many current requirements for the classification and measurement of financial instruments; however, it significantly revises an entitys accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. ASU 2016-01 also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted for public business entities. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard has on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that requires management to assess an entitys ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. The amendments provide a definition of the term substantial doubt and include
63
principles for considering the mitigating effect of managements plans. The amendments also require an evaluation every reporting period, including interim periods for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued), and certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated or not alleviated. The amendments in this update are effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016. Management does not believe these changes will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). Under the new guidance, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In May 2016, ASU 2016-12 amended ASU 2014-09 and deferred the effective period to December 15, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact these changes will have on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Portfolio and investment activity
Corporate Debt Portfolio Overview
At November 30, 2016 |
At February 29, 2016 |
At February 28, 2015 |
At February 28, 2014 |
|||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ($ in millions) | ($ in millions) | ($ in millions) | |||||||||||||
Number of investments(1) |
52 | 59 | 63 | 59 | ||||||||||||
Number of portfolio companies(1) |
30 | 34 | 34 | 37 | ||||||||||||
Average investment size(1) |
$ | 5.1 | $ | 4.6 | $ | 3.5 | $ | 3.2 | ||||||||
Weighted average maturity(1) |
3.4 yrs | 3.8yrs | 3.7yrs | 4.3yrs | ||||||||||||
Number of industries(1) |
11 | 11 | 14 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Average investment per portfolio company(1) |
$ | 8.9 | $ | 8.0 | $ | 6.6 | $ | 5.0 | ||||||||
Non-performing or delinquent |
$ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.3 | ||||||||
Fixed rate debt (% of interest bearing portfolio)(2) |
$ | 46.7(18.3) | % | $ | 97.9(40.0) | % | $ | 82.5(40.6) | % | $ | 70.6(40.1) | % | ||||
Weighted average current coupon(2) |
11.9 | % | 11.5 | % | 12.0 | % | 12.5 | % | ||||||||
Floating rate debt (% of interest bearing portfolio)(2) |
$ | 208.5(81.7) | % | $ | 146.8(60.0) | % | $ | 120.8(59.4) | % | $ | 105.4(59.9) | % | ||||
Weighted average current spread over LIBOR(2)(3) |
10.1 | % | 9.1 | % | 8.7 | % | 7.3 | % |
(1) | Excludes our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO. |
(2) | Excludes our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO and investments in equity interests. |
(3) | Calculation uses either 1-month or 3-month LIBOR, depending on the contractual turns, and after factoring in any existing LIBOR floors. |
During the three months ended November 30, 2016, we invested $30.1 million in new or existing portfolio companies and had $23.8 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments resulting in net investments of $6.3 million for the period. During the three months ended November 30, 2015, we invested $15.3 million in new or existing portfolio companies and had $27.9 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments resulting in net repayments of $12.6 million for the period.
During the nine months ended November 30, 2016, we invested $85.9 million in new or existing portfolio companies and had $94.7 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments resulting in net repayments of $8.8 million for the period. During the nine months ended November 30, 2015, we invested $57.4 million in new
64
or existing portfolio companies and had $62.7 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments resulting in net repayments of $5.3 million for the period.
During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2016, we invested $109.2 million in new or existing portfolio companies and had $68.2 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments resulting in net investments of $41.0 million for the year.
During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015, we invested $104.9 million in new or existing portfolio companies and had $73.3 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments resulting in net investments of $31.6 million for the year.
During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, we invested $121.1 million in new or existing portfolio companies and had $71.6 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments resulting in net investments of $49.5 million for the year.
Our portfolio composition at November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 at fair value was as follows:
Portfolio composition
At November 30, 2016 | At February 29, 2016 | At February 28, 2015 | At February 28, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Weighted Average Current Yield |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Weighted Average Current Yield |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Weighted Average Current Yield |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Weighted Average Current Yield |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
3.5 | % | 5.4 | % | 4.2 | % | 8.2 | % | 7.6 | % | 6.2 | % | 15.7 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
First lien term loans |
57.8 | 10.5 | 50.9 | 10.6 | 60.3 | 11.0 | 53.6 | 11.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
28.9 | 11.7 | 31.1 | 11.5 | 14.8 | 11.2 | 13.5 | 11.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured notes |
| | | | 1.8 | 13.7 | 2.7 | 15.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga CLO subordinated notes |
| | 4.5 | 16.4 | 7.1 | 25.2 | 9.5 | 18.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
5.5 | 12.2 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity interests |
4.3 | 0.7 | 9.3 | N/A | 8.4 | N/A | 5.0 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 10.8 | % | 100.0 | % | 11.1 | % | 100.0 | % | 11.8 | % | 100.0 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO represents a first loss position in a portfolio that, at November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 was composed of $297.5 million, $302.7 million, $296.9 million and $301.3 million, respectively, in aggregate principal amount of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. This investment is subject to unique risks. (See Risk FactorsOur investment in Saratoga CLO constitutes a leveraged investment in a portfolio of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans and is subject to additional risks and volatility). We do not consolidate the Saratoga CLO portfolio in our consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the metrics below do not include the underlying Saratoga CLO portfolio investments. However, at November 30, 2016 and February 29, 2016, $286.1 million or 98.7% and $283.3 million or 99.4%, respectively, of the Saratoga CLO portfolio investments in terms of market value had a CMR (as defined below) color rating of green or yellow and none and one Saratoga CLO portfolio investment was in default with a fair value of $0.8 million, respectively. At February 28, 2015, $291.6 million or 98.8% of the Saratoga CLO portfolio investments in terms of market value had a CMR (as defined below) color rating of green or yellow and two Saratoga CLO portfolio investments were in default with a fair value of $2.7 million. For more information relating to Saratoga CLO, see the audited financial statements for Saratoga CLO included elsewhere herein.
Saratoga Investment Advisors normally grades all of our investments using a credit and monitoring rating system (CMR). The CMR consists of a single component: a color rating. The color rating is based on several
65
criteria, including financial and operating strength, probability of default, and restructuring risk. The color ratings are characterized as follows: (Green)strong credit; (Yellow)satisfactory credit; (Red)payment default risk, in payment default and/or significant restructuring activity.
The CMR distribution of our investments at November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 was as follows:
Portfolio CMR distribution
At November 30, 2016 | At February 29, 2016 | At February 28, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Color Score |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Green |
$ | 246,130 | 88.7 | % | $ | 240,623 | 84.7 | % | $ | 191,606 | 79.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Yellow |
8,423 | 3.0 | 4,058 | 1.4 | 11,635 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Red |
8 | 0.0 | 8 | 0.0 | 101 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
N/A(1) |
23,009 | 8.3 | 39,307 | 13.9 | 37,196 | 15.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 277,570 | 100.0 | % | $ | 283,996 | 100.0 | % | $ | 240,538 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Comprised of our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO and equity interests. |
The CMR distribution of Saratoga CLO investments at November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 was as follows:
Portfolio CMR distribution
At November 30, 2016 | At February 29, 2016 | At February 28, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Color Score |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Green |
$ | 257,697 | 88.9 | % | $ | 251,570 | 88.3 | % | $ | 278,769 | 94.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Yellow |
28,425 | 9.8 | 31,752 | 11.1 | 12,875 | 4.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Red |
3,840 | 1.3 | 1,331 | 0.5 | 2,978 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
N/A(1) |
37 | 0.0 | 192 | 0.1 | 617 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 289,999 | 100.0 | % | $ | 284,845 | 100.0 | % | $ | 295,239 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Comprised of Saratoga CLOs equity interests. |
66
Portfolio composition by industry grouping at fair value
The following table shows our portfolio composition by industry grouping at fair value at November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015:
At November 30, 2016 | At February 29, 2016 | At February 28, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business Services |
$ | 146,250 | 52.7 | % | $ | 88,596 | 31.2 | % | $ | 52,128 | 21.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Consumer Services |
20,737 | 7.5 | 43,109 | 15.2 | 24,169 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Software as a Service |
| | 39,187 | 13.8 | 53,525 | 22.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Healthcare Services |
28,128 | 10.1 | 24,635 | 8.7 | 20,641 | 8.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Media |
18,522 | 6.7 | 16,574 | 5.8 | 15,026 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Aftermarket |
| | 14,707 | 5.2 | 10,980 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Structured Finance(1) |
15,266 | 5.5 | 12,828 | 4.5 | 17,031 | 7.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Education |
10,919 | 3.9 | 10,694 | 3.8 | 101 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Metals |
8,857 | 3.2 | 10,526 | 3.7 | 15,262 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Food and Beverage |
8,423 | 3.0 | 9,131 | 3.2 | 10,348 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Products |
787 | 0.3 | 7,642 | 2.7 | 9,239 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Building Products |
2,000 | 0.7 | 6,367 | 2.2 | 3,436 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Electronics |
| | | | 6,667 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Publishing |
| | | | 1,985 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aerospace and Defense |
1,020 | 0.4 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate |
16,661 | 6.0 | 9,537 | 3.4 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$277,570 | 100.0% | $ | 283,996 | 100.0 | % | $ | 240,538 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Comprised of our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO. |
67
The following table shows Saratoga CLOs portfolio composition by industry grouping at fair value at November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015:
At November 30, 2016 | At February 29, 2016 | At February 28, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services: Business |
$ | 41,241 | 14.2 | % | $ | 37,308 | 13.1 | % | $ | 42,751 | 14.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
30,765 | 10.6 | 28,339 | 9.9 | 35,341 | 11.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chemicals/Plastics |
23,271 | 8.0 | 24,714 | 8.7 | 25,758 | 8.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
14,664 | 5.1 | 18,898 | 6.6 | 22,026 | 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial Intermediaries |
7,760 | 2.7 | 13,559 | 4.8 | 10,806 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aerospace and Defense |
13,008 | 4.5 | 12,580 | 4.4 | 7,287 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Equipment |
9,921 | 3.4 | 11,777 | 4.1 | 15,290 | 5.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Conglomerate |
12,767 | 4.4 | 11,770 | 4.1 | 19,928 | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Telecommunications |
11,741 | 4.0 | 11,364 | 4.0 | 6,675 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate |
15,678 | 5.4 | 10,175 | 3.6 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
High Tech Industries |
16,703 | 5.8 | 9,451 | 3.3 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Electronics/Electric |
8,344 | 2.9 | 9,342 | 3.3 | 12,904 | 4.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
9,198 | 3.3 | 8,009 | 2.8 | 12,629 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Technology |
3,883 | 1.3 | 7,774 | 2.7 | 1,008 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Utilities |
2,894 | 1.0 | 6,975 | 2.4 | 6,281 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Food Services |
5,872 | 2.0 | 5,944 | 2.1 | 5,886 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Food Products |
3,150 | 1.1 | 5,694 | 2.0 | 5,856 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Automotive |
5,004 | 1.7 | 5,470 | 1.9 | 6,650 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lodging and Casinos |
4,352 | 1.5 | 4,958 | 1.8 | 5,826 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Media |
10,732 | 3.7 | 4,768 | 1.7 | 2,004 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Insurance |
2,988 | 1.0 | 4,712 | 1.7 | 5,425 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Containers/Glass Products |
1,993 | 0.7 | 4,168 | 1.5 | 4,313 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cable and Satellite Television |
1,617 | 0.6 | 3,557 | 1.2 | 2,646 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Publishing |
4,938 | 1.7 | 3,029 | 1.1 | 5,627 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Drugs |
2,936 | 1.0 | 2,873 | 1.0 | 10,091 | 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction & Building |
1,958 | 0.7 | 2,869 | 1.0 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Food/Drug Retailers |
3,835 | 1.3 | 2,737 | 1.0 | 5,861 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brokers/Dealers/Investment Houses |
2,470 | 0.9 | 2,618 | 0.9 | 4,832 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oil & Gas |
2,519 | 0.9 | 2,273 | 0.8 | 6,070 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hotel, Gaming and Leisure |
2,604 | 0.9 | 1,917 | 0.7 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Nonferrous Metals/Minerals |
1,207 | 0.4 | 1,505 | 0.5 | 1,835 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Broadcast Radio and Television |
283 | 0.1 | 1,258 | 0.4 | 467 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Beverage, Food & Tobacco |
3,005 | 1.0 | 984 | 0.3 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Environmental Industries |
801 | 0.3 | 732 | 0.3 | 250 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Services: Consumer |
655 | 0.2 | 496 | 0.2 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Building and Development |
248 | 0.1 | 248 | 0.1 | 485 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Telecommunications/Cellular |
| | | | 2,431 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital Equipment |
3,989 | 1.4 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Transportation |
1,005 | 0.3 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 289,999 | 100.0 | % | $ | 284,845 | 100.0 | % | $ | 295,239 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
Portfolio composition by geographic location at fair value
The following table shows our portfolio composition by geographic location at fair value at November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015. The geographic composition is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company.
At November 30, 2016 | At February 29, 2016 | At February 28, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southeast |
$ | 113,621 | 40.9 | % | $ | 108,661 | 38.3 | % | $ | 92,069 | 38.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Midwest |
55,526 | 20.0 | 57,553 | 20.3 | 55,767 | 23.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Northeast |
41,973 | 15.1 | 52,875 | 18.6 | 34,412 | 14.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Southwest |
24,843 | 9.0 | 25,535 | 9.0 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
West |
16,561 | 6.0 | 24,544 | 8.6 | 40,259 | 16.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other(1) |
15,266 | 5.5 | 12,828 | 4.5 | 17,031 | 7.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Northwest |
7,780 | 2.8 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
International |
2,000 | 0.7 | 2,000 | 0.7 | 1,000 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 277,570 | 100.0 | % | $ | 283,996 | 100.0 | % | $ | 240,538 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Comprised of our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO and, as of November 30, 2016, the Class F Notes of Saratoga CLO. |
Results of operations
Operating results for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and the fiscal years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended November 30, 2016 |
For the Nine Months Ended November 30, 2016 |
For the Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment income |
$ | 8,442 | $ | 24,799 | $ | 30,050 | $ | 27,375 | $ | 22,893 | ||||||||||
Total expenses |
5,023 | 16,238 | 19,372 | 17,701 | 14,019 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net investment income |
3,419 | 8,561 | 10,678 | 9,674 | 8,874 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gains |
260 | 12,300 | 226 | 3,276 | 1,271 | |||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(2,105 | ) | (10,728 | ) | 741 | (1,943 | ) | (1,648 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 1,574 | $ | 10,133 | $ | 11,645 | $ | 11,007 | $ | 8,497 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, we identified errors that impacted the year ended February 28, 2014. The corrections for the errors, which we have concluded are immaterial to all prior period consolidated financial statements, are reflected in the consolidated financial statements and selected financial data included in this Prospectus.
69
Investment income
The composition of our investment income for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and the fiscal years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended November 30, 2016 |
For the Nine Months Ended November 30, 2016 |
For the Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest from investments |
$ | 7,456 | $ | 22,040 | $ | 26,871 | $ | 24,684 | $ | 20,179 | ||||||||||
Management fee income |
375 | 1,124 | 1,495 | 1,520 | 1,775 | |||||||||||||||
Interest from cash and cash equivalents and other income |
611 | 1,635 | 1,684 | 1,171 | 939 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,442 | $ | 24,799 | $ | 30,050 | $ | 27,375 | $ | 22,893 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended November 30, 2016, total investment income of $8.4 million, increased $1.5 million, or 21.7% compared to $6.9 million for the three months ended November 30, 2015. Interest income from investments increased $1.3 million, or 19.7%, to $7.5 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016 from $6.2 million for the three months ended November 30, 2015. This reflects an increase of 15.2% in total investments to $277.6 million at November 30, 2016 from $241.0 million at November 30, 2015, with the weighted average current coupon increasing from 11.3% to 11.9%.
For the nine months ended November 30, 2016, total investment income of $24.8 million, increased $2.5 million, or 11.4% compared to $22.3 million for the nine months ended November 30, 2015. Interest income from investments increased $2.0 million, or 10.3%, to $22.0 million for the nine months ended November 30, 2016 from $20.0 million for the nine months ended November 30, 2015. This reflects an increase of 15.2% in total investments to $277.6 million at November 30, 2016 from $241.0 million at November 30, 2015, with the weighted average current coupon increasing from 11.3% to 11.9%.
For the fiscal year ended February 29, 2016, total investment income increased $2.7 million, or 9.8% compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015. Interest income from investments increased $2.2 million, or 8.9%, to $26.9 million for the year ended February 29, 2016 from $24.7 million for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015. This reflects an increase of 18.1% in total investments to $284.0 million at February 29, 2016 from $240.5 million at February 28, 2015, offset by the weighted average current coupon reducing from 12.0% to 11.5%.
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015, total investment income increased $4.5 million, or 19.6% compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. Interest income from investments increased $4.5 million, or 22.3%, to $24.7 million for the year ended February 28, 2015 from $20.2 million for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. This reflects an increase of 16.9% in total investments to $240.5 million at February 28, 2015 from $205.8 million at February 28, 2014, offset by the weighted average current coupon reducing from 12.5% to 12.0%.
For the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016, total PIK income was $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the fiscal years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, total PIK income was $1.0 million, $1.2 million, and $0.9 million, respectively.
The Saratoga CLO was refinanced in October 2013. As a result, proceeds from principal payments in the loan portfolio of Saratoga CLO must now be used to paydown its outstanding notes. Thus, the management fee income and investment income that we receive from Saratoga CLO has declined from historical periods, decreasing $0.03 million or 1.7% to $1.5 million and $0.3 million or 14.3% to $1.5 million, for the years ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, respectively.
70
Operating expenses
The composition of our operating expenses for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 are as follows:
Operating Expenses
For the Three Months Ended November 30, 2016 |
For the Nine Months Ended November 30, 2016 |
For the Year Ended |
||||||||||||||||||
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and debt financing expenses |
$ | 2,369 | $ | 7,107 | $ | 8,456 | $ | 7,375 | $ | 6,084 | ||||||||||
Base management fees |
1,220 | 3,650 | 4,529 | 4,157 | 3,327 | |||||||||||||||
Professional fees |
330 | 992 | 1,336 | 1,302 | 1,212 | |||||||||||||||
Incentive management fees |
342 | 992 | 2,232 | 2,548 | 939 | |||||||||||||||
Administrator expenses |
395 | 2,331 | 1,175 | 1,000 | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||
Insurance |
69 | 210 | 331 | 337 | 443 | |||||||||||||||
Directors fees and expenses |
66 | 192 | 204 | 210 | 204 | |||||||||||||||
Excise tax expense |
232 | 764 | 114 | 294 | | |||||||||||||||
General & administrative and other expenses |
| | 995 | 478 | 810 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total expenses |
$ | 5,023 | $ | 16,238 | $ | 19,372 | $ | 17,701 | $ | 14,019 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended November 30, 2016, total operating expenses increased $0.2 million, or 5.0% compared to the three months ended November 30, 2015. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016, total operating expenses increased $1.6 million, or 10.6% compared to the nine months ended November 30, 2015.
For the year ended February 29, 2016, total operating expenses increased $1.7 million, or 9.4% compared to the year ended February 28, 2015. For the year ended February 28, 2015, total operating expenses increased $3.7 million, or 26.3% compared to the year ended February 28, 2014.
For the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and the years ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the increase in interest and debt financing expenses is primarily attributable to an increase in outstanding debt as compared to the prior years, with increased levels of outstanding SBA debentures, as well as the notes payable being outstanding for the full year ended February 29, 2016, and additional notes being issued during this year. The Credit Facility decreased from $9.6 million outstanding at February 28, 2015 to $0.0 million at February 29, 2016, while our SBA debentures increased from $79.0 million at November 30, 2015 to $112.7 million at November 30, 2016 and from $79.0 million to $103.7 million from February 28, 2015 to February 29, 2016. The notes increased from $61.4 million outstanding to $61.8 million outstanding and from $48.3 million outstanding to $61.8 million outstanding for these same periods. For the three months ended November 30, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding indebtedness was 4.66% compared to 5.07% for the three months ended November 30, 2015. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding indebtedness was 4.73% compared to 4.99% for the nine months ended November 30, 2015. For the year ended February 29, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding indebtedness was 4.91% compared to 4.95% for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015 and 5.35% for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. This decrease was primarily driven by an increase in SBA debentures that carry a lower interest rate but now make up a higher proportion of our overall debt, increasing from 56.3% of overall debt as of November 30, 2015 to 64.6% as of November 30, 2016 and from 57.7% of overall debt as of February 28, 2015 to 62.7% as of February 29, 2016.
For the three months ended November 30, 2016, base management fees increased $0.1 million, or 11.8% compared to the three months ended November 30, 2015. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016, base
71
management fees increased $0.3 million, or 8.4% compared to the nine months ended November 30, 2015. The increase in base management fees results from the 11.8% increase in the average value of our total assets, less cash and cash equivalents, from $250.1 million as of November 30, 2015 to $279.6 million as of November 30, 2016. For the year ended February 29, 2016, base management fees increased $0.4 million, or 8.9% compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015. The increase in base management fees results from the increase in the average value of our total assets, less cash and cash equivalents, from $246.5 million as of February 28, 2015 to $266.3 million as of February 29, 2016. For the year ended February 28, 2015, base management fees increased $0.8 million, or 25.0% compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. The increase in base management fees results from the increase in the average value of our total assets, less cash and cash equivalents, from $209.2 million to $246.5 million as of February 28, 2014 and 2015, respectively.
For the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016, professional fees decreased $0.02 million, or 5.0%, and decreased $0.04 million, or 3.8%, respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended November 30, 2015. For the year ended February 29, 2016, professional fees increased $0.03 million, or 2.7% compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015. For the year ended February 28, 2015, professional fees increased $0.09 million, or 7.4% compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.
For the three months ended November 30, 2016, incentive management fees decreased $0.01 million, or 2.4%, compared to the three months ended November 30, 2015. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016, incentive management fees increased $0.2 million, or 7.9%, compared to the nine months ended November 30, 2015. For the year ended February 29, 2016, incentive management fees decreased $0.3 million, or 12.4% compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015. The first part of the incentive management fees increased this year, as higher total assets has led to increased net investment income above the hurdle rate pursuant to the Management Agreement. For the three months ended November 30, 2016, there was a reduction of $0.4 million in incentive management fees related to capital gains compared to a $0.2 million increase in expense as compared to the three months ended November 30, 2015, reflecting a $1.3 million net gain on investments for the three months ended November 30, 2015, as compared to a $1.8 million net loss on investments for the three months ended November 30, 2016. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016, the incentive management fees related to capital gains decreased from $0.5 million to $0.1 million compared to the nine months ended November 30, 2015, reflecting a $4.5 million net gain on investments for the nine months ended November 30, 2015, as compared to a $1.6 million net gain on investments for the nine months ended November 30, 2016. For the year ended February 29, 2016, incentive management fees in total were more than offset as the incentive management fees related to capital gains changed from a $0.3 million increase in expense to a $0.05 million decrease in expense compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015. For the year ended February 28, 2015, incentive management fees increased $1.6 million, or 171.4% compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. The increase in incentive management fees is primarily attributable to an increase in accrued incentive fees this year, as higher total assets has led to increased net investment income above the hurdle rate pursuant to the Management Agreement. In addition, for the year ended February 28, 2015, the incentive management fees related to capital gains changed from a $0.07 million reduction of expense to a $0.3 million increase in expense compared to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.
As discussed above, the increase in interest and debt financing expenses for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 is primarily attributable to an increase in the amount of outstanding debt as compared to the prior years. For the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 6.00%, 6.00%, 6.00%, 6.75% and 7.50%, respectively. For the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings of the SBA debentures was 3.08%, 3.12%, 3.12%, 2.93% and 3.03%, respectively.
72
Net realized gains/(losses) on sales of investments
For the three months ended November 30, 2016, the Company had $23.8 million of sales, repayments, exits or restructurings resulting in $0.3 million of net realized gains. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016, the Company had $94.7 million of sales, repayments, exits or restructurings resulting in $12.3 million of net realized gains. The most significant realized gains during the nine months ended November 30, 2016 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Nine Months ended November 30, 2016
Issuer |
Asset Type | Gross Proceeds |
Cost | Net Realized Gain |
||||||||||
Take 5 Oil Change, L.L.C. |
Common Stock | $ | 6,505 | $ | 481 | $ | 6,024 | |||||||
Legacy Cabinets, Inc. |
Common Stock Voting A-1 | 2,320 | 221 | 2,099 | ||||||||||
Legacy Cabinets, Inc. |
Common Stock Voting B-1 | 1,464 | 139 | 1,325 |
The $6.0 million of realized gain on our investment in Take 5 Oil Change, L.L.C. was due to the completion of a sales transaction with a strategic acquirer.
The $3.4 million of realized gains on our investments in Legacy Cabinets, Inc. were due to a period of steadily improving performance, leading up to our sale of shares in Legacy Cabinets, Inc.
For the fiscal year ended February 29, 2016, the Company had $68.2 million of sales, repayments, exits or restructurings resulting in $0.2 million of net realized gains. The most significant realized gains and losses during the year ended February 29, 2016 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Fiscal year ended February 29, 2016
Issuer |
Asset Type | Gross Proceeds |
Cost | Net Realized Gain/ (Loss) |
||||||||||
Network Communications, Inc. |
Common Stock | $ | 3,206 | $ | | $ | 3,206 | |||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc. |
Unsecured Note | | (2,054 | ) | (2,054 | ) | ||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc. |
First Lien Term Loan | | (1,172 | ) | (1,172 | ) | ||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc. |
Common Stock | | (567 | ) | (567 | ) |
The $3.2 million of realized gain on our investments in Network Communications, Inc. is due to the sale of the company to a third party and reflects the realization value pursuant to that transaction. The $3.8 million realized loss in our investments in Targus Holdings, Inc. was due to a restructuring that occurred during the quarter, resulting in the elimination of our former Unsecured Note and common equity, accompanied by a conversion of our prior first lien term loan in to a new equity.
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015, the Company had $73.3 million of sales, repayments, exits or restructurings resulting in $3.3 million of net realized gains. The most significant realized gains during the year ended February 28, 2015 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Fiscal year ended February 28, 2015
Issuer |
Asset Type | Gross Proceeds |
Cost | Net Realized Gain/ (Loss) |
||||||||||
Community Investors, Inc. |
Term Loan A Senior Facility | $ | 6,983 | $ | 6,886 | $ | 97 | |||||||
HOA Restaurant GP/Finance |
Senior Secured Notes | 4,225 | 3,938 | 287 | ||||||||||
USS Parent Holding Corp |
Non Voting Common Stock | 248 | 133 | 115 | ||||||||||
USS Parent Holding Corp |
Voting Common Stock | 5,650 | 3,026 | 2,624 |
73
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, the Company had $71.6 million of sales, repayments, exits or restructurings resulting in $1.3 million of net realized gains. The most significant realized gains during the year ended February 28, 2014 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Fiscal year ended February 28, 2014
Issuer |
Asset Type | Gross Proceeds |
Cost | Net Realized Gain/ (Loss) |
||||||||||
Penton Media, Inc. |
First Lien Term Loan | $ | 4,887 | $ | 4,681 | $ | 206 | |||||||
Sourcehov, LLC |
Second Lien Term Loan | 3,030 | 2,659 | 371 | ||||||||||
Worldwide Express Operations, LLC |
Warrants | 128 | | 128 |
Net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments
For the three months ended November 30, 2016, our investments had net unrealized depreciation of $2.1 million versus net unrealized appreciation of $0.8 million for the three months ended November 30, 2015. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016, our investments had net unrealized depreciation of $10.7 million versus net unrealized appreciation of $0.2 million for the nine months ended November 30, 2015. The most significant cumulative changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation for the nine months ended November 30, 2016, were the following (dollars in thousands):
Nine Months ended November 30, 2016
Issuer |
Asset Type | Cost | Fair Value |
Total Unrealized Depreciation |
YTD Change in Unrealized Depreciation |
|||||||||||||
Take 5 Oil Change, L.L.C. |
Common Stock | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | (5,755 | ) | ||||||||
Legacy Cabinets, Inc. |
Common Stock Voting A-1 | | | | (2,456 | ) | ||||||||||||
Legacy Cabinets, Inc. |
Common Stock Voting B-1 | | | | (1,550 | ) | ||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C. |
Common Stock | 9,217 | 357 | (8,860 | ) | (1,669 | ) |
The $5.8 million of change in unrealized depreciation in our investment in Take 5 Oil Change, L.L.C. was driven by the completion of a sales transaction with a strategic acquirer. In realizing this gain as a result of the sale, unrealized appreciation was adjusted to zero, which resulted in a $5.8 million change in unrealized depreciation for the period.
The $4.0 million of change in unrealized depreciation in our investments in Legacy Cabinets, Inc. were driven by the completion of a sales transaction. In realizing these gains as a result of the sale, unrealized appreciation was adjusted to zero, which resulted in a $4.0 million change in unrealized depreciation for the period.
The $1.7 million of change in unrealized depreciation in our investment in Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C. was driven by a decline in oil and gas end markets since year-end, negatively impacting the companys performance.
74
For the year ended February 29, 2016, our investments had net unrealized appreciation of $0.7 million versus net unrealized depreciation of $1.9 million for the year ended February 28, 2015. The most significant cumulative changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation for the year ended February 29, 2016, were the following (dollars in thousands):
Fiscal year ended February 29, 2016
Issuer |
Asset Type | Cost | Fair Value |
Total Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) |
YTD Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) |
|||||||||||||
Take 5 Oil Change, LLC |
Common Stock | $ | 481 | $ | 6,235 | $ | 5,754 | $ | 4,762 | |||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc. |
Unsecured Notes | | | | 2,054 | |||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, LLC |
Common Stock | 9,217 | 2,026 | (7,191 | ) | (4,735 | ) |
The $4.8 million of change in unrealized appreciation in our investment in Take 5 Oil Change, LLC was driven by a transaction with a strategic acquirer.
The $2.1 million of change in unrealized appreciation in our investment in Targus Holdings, Inc. was due to a restructuring that occurred during the quarter, resulting in the elimination of our former Unsecured Note. In realizing this loss as a result of the restructuring, unrealized depreciation was adjusted to zero which resulted in a $2.1 million change in unrealized appreciation for the year.
The $4.7 million change in unrealized depreciation in our investment in the Elyria Foundry Company, LLC was primarily due to a decline in oil and gas end markets since year-end, negatively impacting the Companys performance.
For the year ended February 28, 2015, our investments had net unrealized depreciation of $1.9 million versus net unrealized depreciation of $1.6 million for the year ended February 28, 2014. The most significant cumulative changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation for the year ended February 28, 2015, were the following (dollars in thousands):
Fiscal year ended February 28, 2015
Issuer |
Asset Type | Cost | Fair Value |
Total Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) |
YTD Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) |
|||||||||||||
Legacy Cabinets, Inc. |
CommonVoting A-1 | $ | 221 | $ | 1,493 | $ | 1,272 | $ | 941 | |||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc. |
Common | 567 | | (567 | ) | (730 | ) | |||||||||||
Saratoga CLO |
Other/Structured Finance Securities |
15,953 | 17,031 | 1,078 | (1,935 | ) |
75
For the year ended February 28, 2014, our investments had a decrease in net unrealized depreciation of $1.6 million versus an increase in net unrealized appreciation of $7.0 million for the year ended February 28, 2013. The most significant cumulative changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation for the year ended February 28, 2014, were the following (in thousands):
Fiscal year ended February 28, 2014
Issuer |
Asset Type | Cost | Fair Value |
Total Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) |
YTD Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) |
|||||||||||||
Saratoga CLO |
Other/Structured Finance Securities |
$ | 16,556 | $ | 19,570 | $ | 3,014 | $ | (3,558 | ) | ||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc. |
Common Stock | 567 | 730 | 163 | (2,595 | ) | ||||||||||||
USS Parent Holding Corp. |
Voting Common Stock | 3,026 | 5,028 | 2,002 | 2,162 | |||||||||||||
Group Dekko, Inc. |
Second Lien Term Loan | 6,902 | 6,741 | (161 | ) | (56 | ) | |||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, LLC |
Senior Secured Notes | 9,037 | 6,777 | (2,260 | ) | (2,259 | ) |
Changes in net assets resulting from operations
For the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and the fiscal years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, we recorded a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $1.6 million, $10.1 million, $11.6 million, $11.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively. Based on 5,727,933 weighted average common shares outstanding as of November 30, 2016, our per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $0.27 for the three months ended November 30, 2016. This compares to a per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $0.61 for the three months ended November 30, 2015 based on 5,632,011 weighted average common shares outstanding as of November 30, 2015. Based on 5,735,443 weighted average common shares outstanding as of November 30, 2016, our per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $1.77 for the nine months ended November 30, 2016. This compares to a per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $2.18 for the nine months ended November 30, 2015 based on 5,533,094 weighted average common shares outstanding as of November 30, 2015. Based on 5,582,453 weighted average common shares outstanding as of February 29, 2016, our per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $2.09 for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2016. This compares to a per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $2.04 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015 (based on 5,385,049 weighted average common shares outstanding as of February 28, 2015), and a per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $1.73 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014 (based on 4,920,517 weighted average common shares outstanding as of February 28, 2014).
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We intend to continue to generate cash primarily from cash flows from operations, including interest earned from our investments in debt in middle market companies, interest earned from the temporary investment of cash in U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less, future borrowings and future offerings of securities.
Although we expect to fund the growth of our investment portfolio through the net proceeds from SBA debenture drawdowns and future equity offerings, including our dividend reinvestment plan, and issuances of senior securities or future borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, we cannot assure you that our plans to raise capital will be successful. In this regard, because our common stock has historically traded at a price below our current net asset value per share and we are limited in our ability to sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share, we have been and may continue to be limited in our ability to raise equity capital.
76
In addition, we intend to distribute to our stockholders substantially all of our taxable income in order to satisfy the distribution requirement applicable to RICs under Subchapter M of the Code. In satisfying this distribution requirement, we have in the past relied on IRS issued private letter rulings concluding that a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC subject to a limitation on the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders, which limitation must be at least 20% of the aggregate declared distribution. We may rely on these IRS private letter rulings in future periods to satisfy our RIC distribution requirement.
Also, as a BDC, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets, less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any outstanding preferred stock, of at least 200%. This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow. Our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act, was 306.6% as of November 30, 2016, 302.5% as of February 29, 2016 and 311.7% as of February 28, 2015. To fund growth in our investment portfolio in the future, we anticipate needing to raise additional capital from various sources, including the equity markets and other debt-related markets, which may or may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.
Consequently, we may not have the funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional investments in our portfolio companies, to fund our unfunded commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. Also, the illiquidity of our portfolio investments may make it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired and, if we are required to sell these investments, we may realize significantly less than their recorded value.
Madison revolving credit facility
Below is a summary of the terms of the senior secured revolving credit facility we entered into with Madison Capital Funding (the Credit Facility) on June 30, 2010.
Availability. The Company can draw up to the lesser of (i) $40.0 million (the Facility Amount) and (ii) the product of the applicable advance rate (which varies from 50.0% to 75.0% depending on the type of loan asset) and the value, determined in accordance with the Credit Facility (the Adjusted Borrowing Value), of certain eligible loan assets pledged as security for the loan (the Borrowing Base), in each case less (a) the amount of any undrawn funding commitments the Company has under any loan asset and which are not covered by amounts in the Unfunded Exposure Account referred to below (the Unfunded Exposure Amount) and (b) outstanding borrowings. Each loan asset held by the Company as of the date on which the Credit Facility was closed was valued as of that date and each loan asset that the Company acquires after such date will be valued at the lowest of its fair value, its face value (excluding accrued interest) and the purchase price paid for such loan asset. Adjustments to the value of a loan asset will be made to reflect, among other things, changes in its fair value, a default by the obligor on the loan asset, insolvency of the obligor, acceleration of the loan asset, and certain modifications to the terms of the loan asset.
The Credit Facility contains limitations on the type of loan assets that are eligible to be included in the Borrowing Base and as to the concentration level of certain categories of loan assets in the Borrowing Base such as restrictions on geographic and industry concentrations, asset size and quality, payment frequency, status and terms, average life, and collateral interests. In addition, if an asset is to remain an eligible loan asset, the Company may not make changes to the payment, amortization, collateral and certain other terms of the loan assets without the consent of the administrative agent that will either result in subordination of the loan asset or be materially adverse to the lenders.
Collateral. The Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company (other than assets held by our SBIC subsidiary) and includes the subordinated notes (CLO Notes) issued by Saratoga CLO and the Companys rights under the CLO Management Agreement (as defined below).
77
Interest Rate and Fees. Under the Credit Facility, funds are borrowed from or through certain lenders at the greater of the prevailing LIBOR rate and 2.00%, plus an applicable margin of 5.50%. At the Companys option, funds may be borrowed based on an alternative base rate, which in no event will be less than 3.00%, and the applicable margin over such alternative base rate is 4.50%. In addition, the Company pays the lenders a commitment fee of 0.75% per year on the unused amount of the Credit Facility for the duration of the Revolving Period (defined below). Accrued interest and commitment fees are payable monthly. The Company was also obligated to pay certain other fees to the lenders in connection with the closing of the Credit Facility.
Revolving Period and Maturity Date. The Company may make and repay borrowings under the Credit Facility for a period of three years following the closing of the Credit Facility (the Revolving Period). The Revolving Period may be terminated at an earlier time by the Company or, upon the occurrence of an event of default, by action of the lenders or automatically. All borrowings and other amounts payable under the Credit Facility are due and payable in full five years after the end of the Revolving Period.
Collateral Tests. It is a condition precedent to any borrowing under the Credit Facility that the principal amount outstanding under the Credit Facility, after giving effect to the proposed borrowings, not exceed the lesser of the Borrowing Base or the Facility Amount (the Borrowing Base Test). In addition to satisfying the Borrowing Base Test, the following tests must also be satisfied (together with Borrowing Base Test, the Collateral Tests):
| Interest Coverage Ratio. The ratio (expressed as a percentage) of interest collections with respect to pledged loan assets, less certain fees and expenses relating to the Credit Facility, to accrued interest and commitment fees and any breakage costs payable to the lenders under the Credit Facility for the last 6 payment periods must equal at least 175.0%. |
| Overcollateralization Ratio. The ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the aggregate Adjusted Borrowing Value of eligible pledged loan assets plus the fair value of certain ineligible pledged loan assets and the CLO Notes (in each case, subject to certain adjustments) to outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility plus the Unfunded Exposure Amount must equal at least 200.0%. |
| Weighted Average FMV Test. The aggregate adjusted or weighted value of eligible pledged loan assets as a percentage of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of eligible pledged loan assets must be equal to or greater than 72.0% and 80.0% during the one-year periods prior to the first and second anniversary of the closing date, respectively, and 85.0% at all times thereafter. |
The Credit Facility also requires payment of outstanding borrowings or replacement of pledged loan assets upon the Companys breach of its representation and warranty that pledged loan assets included in the Borrowing Base are eligible loan assets. Such payments or replacements must equal the lower of the amount by which the Borrowing Base is overstated as a result of such breach or any deficiency under the Collateral Tests at the time of repayment or replacement. Compliance with the Collateral Tests is also a condition to the discretionary sale of pledged loan assets by the Company.
Priority of Payments. During the Revolving Period, the priority of payments provisions of the Credit Facility require, after payment of specified fees and expenses and any necessary funding of the Unfunded Exposure Account, that collections of principal from the loan assets and, to the extent that these are insufficient, collections of interest from the loan assets, be applied on each payment date to payment of outstanding borrowings if the Borrowing Base Test, the Overcollateralization Ratio and the Interest Coverage Ratio would not otherwise be met. Similarly, following termination of the Revolving Period, collections of interest are required to be applied, after payment of certain fees and expenses, to cure any deficiencies in the Borrowing Base Test, the Interest Coverage Ratio and the Overcollateralization Ratio as of the relevant payment date.
Reserve Account. The Credit Facility requires the Company to set aside an amount equal to the sum of accrued interest, commitment fees and administrative agent fees due and payable on the next succeeding three
78
payment dates (or corresponding to three payment periods). If for any monthly period during which fees and other payments accrue, the aggregate Adjusted Borrowing Value of eligible pledged loan assets which do not pay cash interest at least quarterly exceeds 15.0% of the aggregate Adjusted Borrowing Value of eligible pledged loan assets, the Company is required to set aside such interest and fees due and payable on the next succeeding six payment dates. Amounts in the reserve account can be applied solely to the payment of administrative agent fees, commitment fees, accrued and unpaid interest and any breakage costs payable to the lenders.
Unfunded Exposure Account. With respect to revolver or delayed draw loan assets, the Company is required to set aside in a designated account (the Unfunded Exposure Account) 100.0% of its outstanding and undrawn funding commitments with respect to such loan assets. The Unfunded Exposure Account is funded at the time the Company acquires a revolver or delayed draw loan asset and requests a related borrowing under the Credit Facility. The Unfunded Exposure Account is funded through a combination of proceeds of the requested borrowing and other Company funds, and if for any reason such amounts are insufficient, through application of the priority of payment provisions described above.
Operating Expenses. The priority of payments provision of the Credit Facility provides for the payment of certain operating expenses of the Company out of collections on principal and interest during the Revolving Period and out of collections on interest following the termination of the Revolving Period in accordance with the priority established in such provision. The operating expenses payable pursuant to the priority of payment provisions is limited to $350,000 for each monthly payment date or $2.5 million for the immediately preceding period of twelve consecutive monthly payment dates. This ceiling can be increased by the lesser of 5.0% or the percentage increase in the fair market value of all the Companys assets only on the first monthly payment date to occur after each one-year anniversary following the closing of the Credit Facility. Upon the occurrence of a Manager Event (described below), the consent of the administrative agent is required in order to pay operating expenses through the priority of payments provision.
Events of Default. The Credit Facility contains certain negative covenants, customary representations and warranties and affirmative covenants and events of default. The Credit Facility does not contain grace periods for breach by the Company of certain covenants, including, without limitation, preservation of existence, negative pledge, change of name or jurisdiction and separate legal entity status of the Company covenants and certain other customary covenants. Other events of default under the Credit Facility include, among other things, the following:
| an Interest Coverage Ratio of less than 150.0%; |
| an Overcollateralization Ratio of less than 175.0%; |
| the filing of certain ERISA or tax liens; |
| the occurrence of certain Manager Events such as: |
| failure by Saratoga Investment Advisors and its affiliates to maintain collectively, directly or indirectly, a cash equity investment in the Company in an amount equal to at least $5,000,000 at any time prior to the third anniversary of the closing date; |
| failure of the Management Agreement between Saratoga Investment Advisors and the Company to be in full force and effect; |
| indictment or conviction of Saratoga Investment Advisors or any key person for a felony offense, or any fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation of funds by Saratoga Investment Advisors or any key person and, in the case of key persons, without a reputable, experienced individual reasonably satisfactory to Madison Capital Funding appointed to replace such key person within 30 days; |
79
| resignation, termination, disability or death of a key person or failure of any key person to provide active participation in Saratoga Investment Advisors daily activities, all without a reputable, experienced individual reasonably satisfactory to Madison Capital Funding appointed within 30 days; or |
| occurrence of any event constituting cause under the Collateral Management Agreement between the Company and Saratoga CLO (the CLO Management Agreement), delivery of a notice under Section 12(c) of the CLO Management Agreement with respect to the removal of the Company as collateral manager or the Company ceases to act as collateral manager under the CLO Management Agreement. |
Conditions to Acquisitions and Pledges of Loan Assets. The Credit Facility imposes certain additional conditions to the acquisition and pledge of additional loan assets. Among other things, the Company may not acquire additional loan assets without the prior written consent of the administrative agent until such time that the administrative agent indicates in writing its satisfaction with Saratoga Investment Advisors policies, personnel and processes relating to the loan assets.
Fees and Expenses. The Company paid certain fees and reimbursed Madison Capital Funding for the aggregate amount of all documented, out-of-pocket costs and expenses, including the reasonable fees and expenses of lawyers, incurred by Madison Capital Funding in connection with the Credit Facility and the carrying out of any and all acts contemplated thereunder up to and as of the date of closing of the stock purchase transaction with Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates. These amounts totaled $2.0 million.
On February 24, 2012, we amended our senior secured revolving credit facility with Madison Capital Funding LLC to, among other things:
| expand the borrowing capacity under the credit facility from $40.0 million to $45.0 million; |
| extend the Revolving Period from July 30, 2013 to February 24, 2015; and |
| remove the condition that we may not acquire additional loan assets without the prior written consent of the administrative agent. |
On September 17, 2014, we entered into a second amendment to the Revolving Facility with Madison Capital Funding LLC to, among other things:
| extend the commitment termination date from February 24, 2015 to September 17, 2017; |
| extend the maturity date of the Revolving Facility from February 24, 2020 to September 17, 2022 (unless terminated sooner upon certain events); |
| reduce the applicable margin rate on base rate borrowings from 4.50% to 3.75%, and on LIBOR borrowings from 5.50% to 4.75%; and |
| reduce the floor on base rate borrowings from 3.00% to 2.25%; and on LIBOR borrowings from 2.00% to 1.25%. |
As of November 30, 2016 and February 29, 2016, we had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and $112.7 million and $103.7 million SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding, respectively (which are discussed below). As of February 28, 2015, we had $9.6 million outstanding under the Credit Facility and $79.0 million SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. Our borrowing base under the Credit Facility at November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 was $24.1 million, $21.8 million and $36.3 million, respectively.
Our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act, was 306.6%, 302.5% and 311.7% as of November 30, 2016 and for the years ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, respectively.
SBA-guaranteed debentures
In addition, we, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, sought and obtained a license from the SBA to operate an SBIC. In this regard, on March 28, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC, LP,
80
received a license from the SBA to operate as an SBIC under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.
The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities.
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that our SBIC subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of $150.0 million when it has at least $75.0 million in regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of February 29, 2016, our SBIC subsidiary had $75.0 million in regulatory capital and $103.7 million SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding.
We received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows us increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test by permitting us to borrow up to $150.0 million more than we would otherwise be able to absent the receipt of this exemptive relief.
On April 2, 2015, the SBA issued a green light letter inviting us to continue the application process to obtain a license to form and operate its second SBIC subsidiary. On September 27, 2016, the SBA informed us that as part of their continued review of our application for a second license, and in order to ensure that they were reviewing the most current information available, we would need to update all previously submitted materials and invited us to reapply. As a result of this request, with which we are in the process of complying, the existing green light letter that the SBA issued to us has expired. If approved in the future, a second SBIC license would provide us an incremental source of long-term capital by permitting us to issue up to $150.0 million of additional SBA-guaranteed debentures in addition to the $150.0 million already approved under the first license.
Unsecured notes
In May 2013, we issued $48.3 million in aggregate principal amount of our 2020 Notes for net proceeds of $46.1 million after deducting underwriting commissions of $1.9 million and offering costs of $0.3 million. The proceeds included the underwriters full exercise of their overallotment option. Interest on these 2020 Notes is paid quarterly in arrears on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15, at a rate of 7.50% per year, beginning August 15, 2013. The 2020 Notes mature on May 31, 2020 and since May 31, 2016 may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option. Pursuant to the Companys Notification of Redemption of Securities filed on December 14, 2016, the Company has redeemed in full its 2020 Notes. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the 2023 Notes offering, which commenced on December 21, 2016, to repay all the outstanding indebtedness under the 2020 Notes. In connection with the issuance of the 2020 Notes, we agreed to the following covenants for the period of time during which the 2020 Notes are outstanding:
The 2020 Notes were redeemed in full on January 13, 2017 and are no longer listed on the NYSE.
On May 29, 2015, we entered into a Debt Distribution Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. through which we may offer for sale, from time to time, up to $20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Notes through an ATM offering. As of November 30, 2016, the Company sold 539,725 2020 N with a principal of $13,493,125 at an average price of $25.31 for aggregate net proceeds of $13,385,766 (net of transaction costs).
81
On December 21, 2016, we issued $74.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our 2023 Notes for net proceeds of $72.1 million after deducting underwriting commissions of approximately $2.0 million and offering costs of approximately $0.5 million. The issuance included the exercise of substantially all of the underwriters option to purchase an additional $9.8 million aggregate principal amount of 2023 Notes within 30 days. Interest on the 2023 Notes is paid quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15, at a rate of 6.75% per year, beginning March 30, 2017. The 2023 Notes mature on December 20, 2023, and commencing December 21, 2019, may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option. The net proceeds from the offering were used to repay all of the outstanding indebtedness under the 2020 Notes, which amounts to $61.8 million, and for general corporate purposes in accordance with our investment objective and strategies. The 2020 Notes were redeemed in full on January 13, 2017.
In connection with the issuance of the 2023 Notes, we agreed to the following covenants for the period of time during which the notes are outstanding:
| we will not violate (whether or not we are subject to) Section 18(a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act or any successor provisions, but giving effect to any exemptive relief granted to us by the SEC. Currently, these provisions generally prohibit us from making additional borrowings, including through the issuance of additional debt or the sale of additional debt securities, unless our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowings. |
| if, at any time, we are not subject to the reporting requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, to file any periodic reports with the SEC, we agree to furnish to holders of the 2023 Notes and the Trustee, for the period of time during which the 2023 Notes are outstanding, our audited annual consolidated financial statements, within 90 days of our fiscal year end, and unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, within 45 days of our fiscal quarter end (other than our fourth fiscal quarter). All such financial statements will be prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with applicable United States generally accepted accounting principles. |
At November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the fair value of investments, cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts were as follows:
At November 30, 2016 |
At February 29, 2016 |
At February 28, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Percentage of Total |
Fair Value | Percent of Total |
Fair Value | Percent of Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 5,770 | 1.9 | % | $ | 2,440 | 0.8 | % | $ | 1,888 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts |
17,521 | 5.8 | 4,595 | 1.6 | 18,175 | 7.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
9,627 | 3.2 | 11,868 | 4.1 | 18,302 | 7.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
First lien term loans |
160,460 | 53.3 | 144,643 | 49.7 | 145,207 | 55.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
80,195 | 26.7 | 88,178 | 30.3 | 35,603 | 13.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured notes |
| | | | 4,230 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
15,266 | 5.1 | 12,828 | 4.4 | 17,031 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity Interest |
12,022 | 4.0 | 26,479 | 9.1 | 20,165 | 7.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 300,861 | 100.0 | % | $ | 291,031 | 100.0 | % | $ | 260,601 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 24, 2014, we announced the approval of an open market share repurchase plan that allows it to repurchase up to 200,000 shares of our common stock at prices below our NAV as reported in its then most recently published consolidated financial statements, which was subsequently increased to 400,000 shares of our common stock. On October 5, 2016, our board of directors extended the open market share repurchase plan for
82
another year to October 15, 2017 and increased the number of shares we are permitted to repurchase at prices below our NAV, as reported in its then most recently published consolidated financial statements, to 600,000 shares of our common stock. As of November 30, 2016, we purchased 214,391 shares of common stock, at the average price of $16.84 for approximately $3.6 million pursuant to this repurchase plan.
On October 5, 2016, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.44 per share, which was paid on November 9, 2016, to common stockholders of record as of October 31, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 58,548 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $17.12 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on October 27, 28, 31 and November 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9, 2016.
On August 8, 2016, our board of directors declared a special dividend of $0.20 per share, which was paid on September 5, 2016, to common stockholders of record as of August 24, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.7 million in cash and 24,786 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.4% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $17.06 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on August 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31 and September 1 and 2, 2016.
On July 7, 2016, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.43 per share, which was paid on August 9, 2016, to common stockholders of record as of July 29, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 58,167 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $16.32 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on July 27, 28, 29 and August 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9, 2016.
On March 31, 2016, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.41 per share payable on April 27, 2016, to common stockholders of record on April 15, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 56,728 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.43 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on April 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26 and 27, 2016.
On January 12, 2016, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.40 per share payable on February 29, 2016, to common stockholders of record on February 1, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.4 million in cash and 66,764 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.2% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $13.11 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on February 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 29, 2016.
On October 7, 2015, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.36 per share payable on November 30, 2015, to common stockholders of record on November 2, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment
83
of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.1 million in cash and 61,029 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.1% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $14.53 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on November 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 27 and 30, 2015.
On July 8, 2015, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.33 per share payable on August 31, 2015, to common stockholders of record on August 3, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.1 million in cash and 47,861 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.9% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.28 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on August 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 31, 2015.
On May 14, 2015, our board of directors declared a special dividend of $1.00 per share payable on June 5, 2015, to common stockholders of record on May 26, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $3.4 million in cash and 126,230 newly issued shares of common stock, or 2.3% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $16.47 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on May 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 and June 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, 2015.
On April 9, 2015, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.27 per share payable on May 29, 2015, to common stockholders of record on May 4, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP). Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.9 million in cash and 33,766 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.6% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $16.78 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on May 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28 and 29, 2015.
On September 24, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.22 per share payable on February 27, 2015. Shareholders have the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.8 million in cash and 26,858 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.5% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $14.97 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on February 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27, 2015.
Also on September 24, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.18 per share payable on November 28, 2014. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock pursuant to our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.6 million in cash and 22,283 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.4% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $14.37 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on November 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26 and 28, 2014.
On October 30, 2013, our board of directors declared a dividend of $2.65 per share payable on December 27, 2013, to common stockholders of record on November 13, 2013. Shareholders had the option to
84
receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $2.5 million or $0.53 per share. This dividend was declared in reliance on certain private letter rulings issued by the IRS concluding that a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC subject to a limitation on the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders, which limitation must be at least 20.0% of the aggregate declared distribution.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $2.5 million in cash and 649,500 shares of common stock, or 13.7% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 20.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.439 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 11, 13, and 16, 2013.
On November 9, 2012, our board of directors declared a dividend of $4.25 per share payable on December 31, 2012, to common stockholders of record on November 20, 2012. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $3.3 million or $0.85 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $3.3 million in cash and 853,455 shares of common stock, or 22.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 20.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.444 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 14, 17 and 19, 2012.
On November 15, 2011, our board of directors declared a dividend of $3.00 per share payable on December 30, 2011, to common stockholders of record on November 25, 2011. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to $2.0 million or $0.60 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $2.0 million in cash and 599,584 shares of common stock, or 18.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 20.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $13.117067 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 20, 21 and 22, 2011.
On November 12, 2010, our board of directors declared a dividend of $4.40 per share to shareholders payable in cash or shares of our common stock, in accordance with the provisions of the IRS Revenue Procedure 2010-12, which allows a publicly-traded regulated investment company to satisfy its distribution requirements with a distribution paid partly in common stock provided that at least 10.0% of the distribution is payable in cash. The dividend was paid on December 29, 2010 to common shareholders of record on November 19, 2010.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $1.2 million in cash and 596,235 shares of common stock, or 22.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash
85
elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 10.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $17.8049 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 20, 21 and 22, 2010.
On November 13, 2009, our board of directors declared a dividend of $18.25 per share payable on December 31, 2009, to common stockholders of record on November 25, 2009. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to $2.1 million or $0.25 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $2.1 million in cash and 8,648,725 shares of common stock, or 104.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 13.7% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $1.5099 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 24 and 28, 2009.
We cannot provide any assurance that these measures will provide sufficient sources of liquidity to support our operations and growth.
Contractual obligations
The following table shows our payment obligations for repayment of debt and other contractual obligations at November 30, 2016:
Payment Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less Than 1 Year |
1 -3 Years |
3 -5 Years |
More Than 5 Years |
||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
$ | 174,453 | $ | | $ | | $ | 61,793 | $ | 112,660 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet arrangements
The Companys off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $3.0 million, $2.0 million and $11.2 million of unfunded commitments to provide debt financing to its portfolio companies or to fund limited partnership interests as of November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, respectively. Such commitments are generally up to the Companys discretion to approve, or the satisfaction of certain financial and nonfinancial covenants and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Companys consolidated statement of assets and liabilities and are not reflected in the Companys consolidated statements of assets and liabilities.
86
A summary of the composition of the unfunded commitments as of November 30, 2016, February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 is shown in the table below (dollars in thousands):
As of | ||||||||||||
November 30, 2016 |
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC |
$ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | ||||||
Identity Automation |
| 1,000 | | |||||||||
Bristol Hospice, LLC |
| | 7,500 | |||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
| | 2,400 | |||||||||
Knowland Technology Holdings, L.L.C. |
| | 300 | |||||||||
GreyHeller LLC |
2,000 | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 3,000 | $ | 2,000 | $ | 11,200 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
On July 8, 2015, our board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors, approved the annual continuation of our Management Agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC. Our board of directors also approved the renewal of the administration agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC for an additional one-year term and determined to increase the cap on the payment or reimbursement of expenses by us thereunder to $1.3 million for the additional one-year term. On October 5, 2016, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Administration Agreement for an additional one-year term and determined to raise the cap on the payment or reimbursement of expenses by the Company thereunder to $1.5 million for the additional one-year term, effective November 1, 2016.
Recent Developments
On February 28, 2017, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.46 per share, payable on March 28, 2017, to common stockholders of record as of March 15, 2017.
87
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Information about our senior securities is shown in the following table as of February 28/29 for the fiscal years indicated in the table, unless otherwise noted. Ernst & Young LLPs report on the table, as of February 29, 2016, is attached as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsFinancial condition, liquidity and capital resources for more detailed information regarding the senior securities.
Class and Year(1)(2) |
Total Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Treasury Securities(3) |
Asset Coverage per Unit(4) |
Involuntary Liquidating Preference per Share(5) |
Average Market Value per Share(6) |
||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Credit Facility with Madison Capital Funding |
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal year 2017 (as of November 30, 2016, unaudited)(7) |
$ | | $ | 3,066 | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2016 (as of February 29, 2016) |
$ | | $ | 3,025 | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2015 (as of February 28, 2015) |
$ | 9,600 | $ | 3,117 | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2014 (as of February 28, 2014) |
$ | | $ | 3,348 | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2013 (as of February 28, 2013) |
$ | 24,300 | $ | 5,421 | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2012 (as of February 29, 2012) |
$ | 20,000 | $ | 5,834 | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2011 (as of February 28, 2011) |
$ | 4,500 | $ | 20,077 | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2010 (as of February 28, 2010) |
$ | | $ | | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2009 (as of February 28, 2009) |
$ | | $ | | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2008 (as of February 29, 2008) |
$ | | $ | | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2007 (as of February 28, 2007) |
$ | | $ | | | | ||||||||||
7.50% Notes due 2020(9) |
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal year 2017 (as of November 30, 2016 unaudited)(7) |
$ | 61,793 | $ | 3,066 | | $ | 25.35 | (8) | ||||||||
Fiscal year 2016 (as of February 29, 2016) |
$ | 61,793 | $ | 3,025 | $ | 25.24 | (8) | |||||||||
Fiscal year 2015 (as of February 28, 2015) |
$ | 48,300 | $ | 3,117 | | $ | 25.46 | (8) | ||||||||
Fiscal year 2014 (as of February 28, 2014) |
$ | 48,300 | $ | 3,348 | | $ | 25.18 | (8) | ||||||||
Fiscal year 2013 (as of February 28, 2013) |
$ | | $ | | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2012 (as of February 29, 2012) |
$ | | $ | | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2011 (as of February 28, 2011) |
$ | | $ | | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2010 (as of February 28, 2010) |
$ | | $ | | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2009 (as of February 28, 2009) |
$ | | $ | | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2008 (as of February 29, 2008) |
$ | | $ | | | N/A | ||||||||||
Fiscal year 2007 (as of February 28, 2007) |
$ | | $ | | | |
(1) | We have excluded our SBA-guaranteed debentures from this table because the SEC has granted us exemptive relief that permits us to exclude such debentures from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage ratio we are required to maintain under the 1940 Act. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsFinancial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources. |
(2) | This table does not include the senior securities of our predecessor entity, GSC Investment Corp., relating to a revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank, in light of the fact that the Company was under different management during the time that such credit facility was outstanding. |
(3) | Total amount of senior securities outstanding at the end of the period presented. |
(4) | Asset coverage per unit is the ratio of our total assets, less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to the aggregate amount of senior securities representing indebtedness. Asset coverage per unit is expressed in terms of dollar amounts per $1,000 of indebtedness, calculated on a total basis. |
(5) | The amount to which such class of senior security would be entitled upon the involuntary liquidation of the issuer in preference to any security junior to it. The indicates information which the Securities and Exchange Commission expressly does not require to be disclosed for certain types of senior securities. |
(6) | Not applicable for credit facility because not registered for public trading. |
(7) | (Unaudited) Total amount outstanding as of February 27, 2017, including our Credit Facility, 2020 Notes, 2023 Notes, and SBA-guaranteed debentures, was $187.1 million. |
(8) | Based on the average daily trading price of the 2020 Notes on the NYSE. |
88
(9) | On January 13, 2017, the Company redeemed in full its 2020 Notes. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the 2023 Notes offering, which was completed in December 2016, to redeem the 2020 Notes in full. |
89
General
We are a specialty finance company that invests primarily in leveraged loans and mezzanine debt issued by private U.S. middle-market companies, which we define as companies having annual EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of between $2 million and $50 million, both through direct lending and through participation in loan syndicates. Our investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation from our investments. Our investment activities are externally managed and advised by Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, a New York-based investment firm affiliated with Saratoga Partners, a middle market private equity investment firm.
Our portfolio is comprised primarily of investments in leveraged loans (both first and second lien term loans) issued by middle market companies. Leveraged loans are generally senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated debt of the portfolio company. Leveraged loans also have the benefit of security interests on the assets of the portfolio company, which may rank ahead of, or be junior to, other security interests. Term loans are loans that do not allow the borrowers to repay all or a portion of the loans prior to maturity and then re-borrow such repaid amounts under the loan again. We also purchase mezzanine debt and make equity investments in middle market companies. Mezzanine debt is typically unsecured and subordinated to senior debt of the portfolio company.
While our primary focus is to generate current income and capital appreciation from our debt and equity investments in middle market companies, we may invest up to 30.0% of our portfolio in opportunistic investments in order to seek to enhance returns to stockholders. Such investments may include investments in distressed debt, including securities of companies in bankruptcy, foreign debt, private equity, securities of public companies that are not thinly traded and structured finance vehicles such as collateralized loan obligation funds. Although we have no current intention to do so, to the extent we invest in private equity funds, we will limit our investments in entities that are excluded from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act), which includes private equity funds, to no more than 15% of its net assets.
As of November 30, 2016, we had total assets of $305.5 million and investments in 30 portfolio companies and an additional investment in the subordinated notes of one collateralized loan obligation fund, Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (Saratoga CLO), which had a fair value of $11.0 million as of November 30, 2016. The overall portfolio composition as of November 30, 2016 consisted of 3.5% of syndicated loans, 57.8% of first lien term loans, 28.9% of second lien term loans, 5.5% of subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO and Class F notes tranche of the Saratoga CLO and 4.3% of common equity. As of November 30, 2016 the weighted average yield on all of our debt investments, including our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO and Class F notes tranche of the Saratoga CLO, was approximately 10.8%. As of November 30, 2016, approximately 100.0% of our first lien debt investments were fully collateralized in the sense that the portfolio companies in which we held such investments had an enterprise value or our investment had an asset coverage equal to or greater than the principal amount of the related debt investment. The Company uses enterprise value to assess the level of collateralization of its portfolio companies. The enterprise value of a portfolio company is determined by analyzing various factors, including EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), cash flows from operations less capital expenditures and other pertinent factors, such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio companys securities or other liquidation events. As a result, while we consider a portfolio company to be collateralized if its enterprise value exceeds the amount of our loan, we do not hold tangible assets as collateral in our portfolio companies that we would obtain in the event of a default. Our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO represents a first loss position in a portfolio that, at November 30, 2016, was composed of $297.5 million in aggregate principal amount of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. A first loss position means that we will suffer the first economic losses if losses are incurred on loans held by the Saratoga CLO. As a result, this investment is subject to unique risks. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk FactorsOur investment in Saratoga CLO constitutes a leveraged investment in a portfolio of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans and is subject to additional risks and volatility.
90
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act). As a BDC, we are required to comply with various regulatory requirements, including limitations on our use of debt. We finance our investments through borrowings. However, as a BDC, we are only generally allowed to borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200.0% after such borrowing. Pursuant to the 200.0% asset coverage ratio limitation, we are permitted to borrow one dollar to make investments for every dollar we have in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by preferred stock or debt securities issued by us or loans obtained by us so that for every one dollar of outstanding indebtedness we have two dollars of assets.
We have elected to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company (RIC), under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders if we meet certain source-of-income, distribution and asset diversification requirements.
In addition, we have a wholly-owned subsidiary that is licensed as a small business investment company (SBIC) and regulated by the Small Business Administration (SBA). See Item 1. BusinessSmall Business Investment Company Regulations. The SBIC license allows us, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. We received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the 200.0% asset coverage ratio we are required to maintain under the 1940 Act. This allows us increased flexibility under the 200.0% asset coverage test by permitting us to borrow up to $150.0 million more than we would otherwise be able to absent the receipt of this exemptive relief.
Corporate History and Information
We commenced operations, at the time known as GSC Investment Corp., on March 23, 2007 and completed an initial public offering of shares of common stock on March 28, 2007. Prior to July 30, 2010, we were externally managed and advised by GSCP (NJ), L.P., an entity affiliated with GSC Group, Inc. In connection with the consummation of a recapitalization transaction on July 30, 2010, we engaged Saratoga Investment Advisors (SIA) to replace GSCP (NJ), L.P. as our investment adviser and changed our name to Saratoga Investment Corp.
The recapitalization transaction consisted of (i) the private sale of 986,842 shares of our common stock for $15.0 million in aggregate purchase price to Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates and (ii) the entry into a $40.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility with Madison Capital Funding LLC (the Credit Facility). We used the net proceeds from the private sale of shares of our common stock and a portion of the funds available to us under the Credit Facility to pay the full amount of principal and accrued interest, including default interest, outstanding under our revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch. Specifically, in July 2009, we had exceeded permissible borrowing limits under the revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank, which resulted in an event of default under the revolving securitized credit facility. As a result of the event of default, Deutsche Bank had the right to accelerate repayment of the outstanding indebtedness under the revolving securitized credit facility and to foreclose and liquidate the collateral pledged under the revolving securitized credit facility. The revolving securitized credit facility with Deutsche Bank was terminated in connection with our payment of all amounts outstanding thereunder on July 30, 2010. In January 2011, we registered for public resale by Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates the 986,842 shares of our common stock issued to them in the recapitalization.
On March 28, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC, LP, received an SBIC license from the SBA.
91
Our corporate offices are located at 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022. Our telephone number is (212) 906-7800. We maintain a website on the Internet at www.saratogainvestmentcorp.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and you should not consider that information to be part of this prospectus.
Saratoga Investment Advisors
General
Our investment adviser was formed in 2010 as a Delaware limited liability company and became our investment adviser in July 2010. Our investment adviser is led by four principals, Christian L. Oberbeck, Michael J. Grisius, Thomas V. Inglesby, and Charles G. Phillips, with 28, 26, 29 and 19 years of experience in leveraged finance, respectively. Our investment adviser is affiliated with Saratoga Partners, a middle market private equity investment firm. Saratoga Partners was established in 1984 to be the middle market private investment arm of Dillon Read & Co. Inc. and has been independent of Dillon Read and its successor entity, SBC Warburg Dillon Read, since 1998. Saratoga Partners has a 29-year history of private investments in middle market companies and focuses on public and private equity, preferred stock, and senior and mezzanine debt investments.
Our Relationship with Saratoga Investment Advisors
We utilize the personnel, infrastructure, relationships and experience of Saratoga Investment Advisors to enhance the growth of our business. We currently have no employees and each of our executive officers is also an officer of Saratoga Investment Advisors.
We have entered into an investment advisory and management agreement (the Management Agreement) with Saratoga Investment Advisors. Pursuant to the 1940 Act, the initial term of the Management Agreement was for two years from its effective date of July 30, 2010, with automatic, one-year renewals, subject to approval by our board of directors, a majority of whom must be our independent directors. On October 5, 2016, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Management Agreement for an additional one-year term at an in-person meeting. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors implements our business strategy on a day-to-day basis and performs certain services for us under the direction of our board of directors. Saratoga Investment Advisors is responsible for, among other duties, performing all of our day-to-day functions, determining investment criteria, sourcing, analyzing and executing investments, asset sales, financings and performing asset management duties.
Saratoga Investment Advisors has formed an investment committee to advise and consult with its senior management team with respect to our investment policies, investment portfolio holdings, financing and leveraging strategies and investment guidelines. We believe that the collective experience of the investment committee members across a variety of fixed income asset classes will benefit us. The investment committee must unanimously approve all investments in excess of $1.0 million made by us. In addition, all sales of our investments must be approved by all four of our investment committee members. The current members of the investment committee are Messrs. Oberbeck, Grisius, Inglesby, and Phillips.
We pay Saratoga Investment Advisors a fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of two componentsa base management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 1.75% of our gross assets which includes assets purchased with borrowed funds but excludes cash and cash equivalents. As a result, Saratoga Investment Advisors will benefit as we incur debt or use leverage to purchase assets. Our board of directors will monitor the conflicts presented by this compensation structure by approving the amount of leverage that we may incur.
92
In addition to the base management fee, we pay Saratoga Investment Advisors an incentive fee which consists of two parts. First, we pay Saratoga Investment Advisors an incentive fee with respect to our pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:
| no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which our pre-incentive fee income does not exceed a fixed hurdle rate of 1.875% per quarter; and |
| 100.0% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.344% in any fiscal quarter is payable to the investment adviser. We refer to this portion of our pre-incentive fee net investment income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.344%) as the catch-up. The catch-up provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an incentive fee of 20.0% on all of our pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds 2.344% in any fiscal quarter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any period ending on or prior to December 31, 2010, our investment adviser was only entitled to 20.0% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeded 1.875% in any fiscal quarter without any catch-up provision; and |
| 20.0% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 2.344% in any fiscal quarter is payable to the investment adviser (once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved, 20.0% of all pre-incentive fee net investment income thereafter is allocated to the investment adviser). |
There is no accumulation of amounts from quarter to quarter on either the hurdle rate or the parameters set by the catch-up mechanism or any clawback of amounts previously paid to Saratoga Investment Advisers if subsequent quarters are below the quarterly hurdle or the catch-up parameters. Furthermore, there is no delay of payment to Saratoga Investment Advisers if prior quarters are below the quarterly hurdle or catch-up.
Pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend income and other income (including any other fees, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence, managerial and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) earned during the calendar quarter, minus our operating expenses for the quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Management Agreement) and equals 20.0% of our incentive fee capital gains, which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from May 31, 2010 through the end of the fiscal year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee. Importantly, the capital gains portion of the incentive fee is based on realized gains and realized and unrealized losses from May 31, 2010. Therefore, realized and unrealized losses incurred prior to such time will not be taken into account when calculating the capital gains portion of the incentive fee, and Saratoga Investment Advisors will be entitled to 20.0% of incentive fee capital gains that arise after May 31, 2010. In addition, for the purpose of the incentive fee capital gains calculations, the cost basis for computing realized gains and losses on investments held by us as of May 31, 2010 will equal the fair value of such investments as of such date.
We have also entered into a separate administration agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors pursuant to which Saratoga Investment Advisors furnishes us with office facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services. The administration agreement had an initial term of two years from its effective date of July 30, 2010, with automatic one-year renewals, subject to approval by our board of directors, a majority of whom must be our independent directors. From the date of its initial approval and for subsequent annual renewals, the amount payable by us under the administration agreement was capped at $1.0 million for each annual term of the agreement. On October 5, 2016, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Administration Agreement for an additional one-year term and determined to increase the cap on the payment or
93
reimbursement of expenses by us thereunder to $1.5 million for the additional one-year term, effective November 1, 2016. Under the administration agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors also performs, or oversees the performance of our required administrative services, which include, among other things, being responsible for the financial records which we are required to maintain, preparing reports for our stockholders and reports required to be filed with the SEC. Payments under the administration agreement will be equal to an amount based upon the allocable portion of Saratoga Investment Advisors overhead in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and the allocable portion of the cost of our officers and their respective staffs relating to the performance of services under the administration agreement.
Investments
Our portfolio is comprised primarily of investments in leveraged loans (both first and second lien term loans) issued by middle market companies. Investments in middle market companies are generally less liquid than equivalent investments in companies with larger capitalizations. These investments are sourced in both the primary and secondary markets through a network of relationships with commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies and financial sponsors. The leveraged loans that we purchase are generally used to finance buyouts, acquisitions, growth, recapitalizations and other types of transactions. Leveraged loans are generally senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated debt of the portfolio company. Leveraged loans also have the benefit of security interests on the assets of the portfolio company, which may rank ahead of, or be junior to, other security interests. For a discussion of the risks pertaining to our secured investments, see Part I, Item 1A. Risk FactorsOur investments may be risky, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
As part of our long-term strategy, we also purchase mezzanine debt and make equity investments in middle market companies. Mezzanine debt is typically unsecured and subordinated to senior debt of the portfolio company. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk FactorsIf we make unsecured debt investments, we may lack adequate protection in the event our portfolio companies become distressed or insolvent and will likely experience a lower recovery than more senior debtholders in the event our portfolio companies defaults on their indebtedness.
Substantially all of the debt investments held in our portfolio hold a non-investment grade rating by one or more rating agencies or, if not rated, would be rated below investment grade if rated, which are often referred to as junk. As of November 30, 2016, 70.0% of our debt portfolio at fair value consisted of debt securities for which issuers were not required to make principal payments until the maturity of such debt securities, which could result in a substantial loss to us if such issuers are unable to refinance or repay their debt at maturity. In addition, 81.7% of our debt investments at November 30, 2016, had variable interest rates that reset periodically based on benchmarks such as LIBOR and the prime rate. As a result, significant increases in such benchmarks in the future may make it more difficult for these borrowers to service their obligations under the debt investments that we hold.
As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we have to invest at least 70.0% of our total assets in assets of the type listed in section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, including securities of U.S. operating companies whose securities are not listed on a national securities exchange (i.e., New York Stock Exchange, NYSE MKT and The NASDAQ Stock Market), U.S. operating companies with listed securities that have market capitalizations of less than $250.0 million, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less, which we refer to as qualifying assets.
While our primary focus is to generate current income and capital appreciation from our debt and equity investments in middle market companies, we may invest up to 30.0% of the portfolio in opportunistic investments in order to seek to enhance returns to stockholders. Such investments may include investments in distressed debt, private equity, securities of public companies that are not thinly traded and structured finance vehicles such as collateralized loan obligation funds.
94
Leveraged loans
Our leveraged loan portfolio is comprised primarily of first lien and second lien term loans. First lien term loans are secured by a first priority perfected security interest on all or substantially all of the assets of the borrower and typically include a first priority pledge of the capital stock of the borrower. First lien term loans hold a first priority with regard to right of payment. Generally, first lien term loans offer floating rate interest payments, have a stated maturity of five to seven years, and have a fixed amortization schedule. First lien term loans generally have restrictive financial and negative covenants. Second lien term loans are secured by a second priority perfected security interest on all or substantially all of the assets of the borrower and typically include a second priority pledge of the capital stock of the borrower. Second lien term loans hold a second priority with regard to right of payment. Second lien term loans offer either floating rate or fixed rate interest payments, generally have a stated maturity of five to eight years, and may or may not have a fixed amortization schedule. Second lien term loans that do not have fixed amortization schedules require payment of the principal amount of the loan upon the maturity date of the loan. Second lien term loans have less restrictive financial and negative covenants than those that govern first lien term loans.
Mezzanine debt
Mezzanine debt usually ranks subordinate in priority of payment to senior debt and is often unsecured. However, mezzanine debt ranks senior to common and preferred equity in a borrowers capital structure. Mezzanine debt typically has fixed rate interest payments and a stated maturity of six to eight years and does not have fixed amortization schedules.
In some cases, our debt investments may provide for a portion of the interest payable to be paid-in-kind interest (PIK). To the extent interest is paid-in-kind, it will be payable through the increase of the principal amount of the obligation by the amount of interest due on the then-outstanding aggregate principal amount of such obligation.
Equity Investments
Equity investments may consist of preferred equity that is expected to pay dividends on a current basis or preferred equity that does not pay current dividends. Preferred equity generally has a preference over common equity as to distributions on liquidation and dividends. In some cases, we may acquire common equity. In general, our equity investments are not control-oriented investments and we expect that in many cases we will acquire equity securities as part of a group of private equity investors in which we are not the lead investor.
Opportunistic Investments
Opportunistic investments may include investments in distressed debt, which may include securities of companies in bankruptcy, debt and equity securities of public companies that are not thinly traded, emerging market debt, structured finance vehicles such as collateralized loan obligation funds and debt of middle market companies located outside the United States.
On January 22, 2008, GSC Group, Inc., as asset manager, with Lehman Brothers raising the financing, entered into a collateral management agreement with Saratoga CLO. Saratoga CLO was structured with five tranches of debt, plus residual notes. Saratoga CLOs five tranches of debt was purchased by a wide variety of CLO debt market participants. In addition, we purchased for $30.0 million all of the outstanding subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO.
Pursuant to its terms, the investment period for Saratoga CLO ended in January 2013, and certain restrictions in such terms prevented portfolio reinvestment. As a result, the Company determined that it was in its best interest to refinance Saratoga CLO given the fee income it receives for managing Saratoga CLO. The
95
Company did not originate any of the loan assets included in the formation of Saratoga CLO, nor has it done so since the subsequent refinancing transaction. Moreover, the Company does not expect to originate any of the loans in the Saratoga CLO portfolio prospectively. The Company has from time to time co-invested in loans with the Saratoga CLO. The Company currently has no co-investments between it and Saratoga CLO.
With respect to our advisory services to Saratoga CLO, and in particular the underwriting standards used when determining which investments qualify for inclusion in the Saratoga CLO, they are substantially similar to the process employed in selecting the Companys investments. All of the credit metrics for a Saratoga CLO investment are reviewed and documented in the same manner as they would be for an investment for the Company, with some minor differences. For example, the Saratoga CLO investment process also includes the Standard & Poors and Moodys review of the loan investment and the assigned corporate ratings, in addition to the Standard & Poors recovery rate analysis, which typically does not apply to a prospective investment of the Company. Lastly, a Saratoga CLO investment also considers the likely secondary liquidity of the loan in considering the investment, whereas the Companys investments are generally illiquid.
Saratoga CLO was initially refinanced in October 2013 and its reinvestment period ended in October 2016. On November 15, 2016, we completed the second refinancing of the Saratoga CLO. The Saratoga CLO refinancing, among other things, extended its reinvestment period to October 2018, and extended its legal maturity date to October 2025. Following the refinancing, the Saratoga CLO portfolio remained at the same size and with a similar capital structure of approximately $300 million in aggregate principal amount of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. In addition to refinancing its liabilities, we also purchased $4.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the Class F notes tranche of the Saratoga CLO at par, with a coupon of 8.5%. The Class F tranche is the eighth tranche in the capital structure of Saratoga CLO and is subordinated to the other debt classes of Saratoga CLO. The Class F tranche is only senior to the subordinated notes, which is effectively the equity position in Saratoga CLO. As a result, the other tranches of debt in Saratoga CLO rank ahead of the $4.5 million Class F tranche and ahead of the aggregate principal amount of our position in the subordinated notes, which as of November 30, 2016 had a fair value of $4.3 million, with respect to priority of payments in the event of a default or a liquidation. After the reinvestment period ends in October 2018, the Company will consider refinancing the Saratoga CLO, subject to market conditions. A refinancing transaction entails finding existing and new investors that are willing to provide debt financing to Saratoga CLO on terms that are acceptable to it and in an amount sufficient to allow it to repay all of its existing debt holders. If Saratoga CLO is unable to refinance its indebtedness by October 2018, then Saratoga CLO will be required to use investment repayments by portfolio companies received thereafter to repay its outstanding indebtedness and ultimately liquidate Saratoga CLO.
The terms of the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO entitles the Company to the residual net interest income in Saratoga CLO, which are paid on a quarterly basis after payment of all expenses, assuming that the Saratoga CLO remains in compliance with its various debt and rating agency compliance tests. The Companys investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO can be sold or transferred at any time. The Company has held 100% of the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO since the inception of Saratoga CLO.
Generally, the interests of the holders of the various classes of securities issued by the Saratoga CLO are aligned with the interests of the Company as holder of the subordinated notes. The investors in the various debt tranches of the securities issued by the Saratoga CLO are interested in the regular payment of interest income from the Saratoga CLO and the overcollateralization of the underlying loan assets relative to the Saratoga CLO debt issued. On the other hand, the subordinated note holders might prefer purchasing higher yielding riskier assets that could increase returns while the returns of the holders of the debt securities remain unchanged.
With respect to the collateral management agreement that the Company has entered into with Saratoga CLO, while the agreement is similar to the investment advisory and management agreement between the Company and Saratoga Investment Advisors in that it is an asset management agreement, there are material differences between the two. For example, pursuant to Section 15 of the 1940 Act, the Management Agreement
96
with Saratoga Investment Advisors has an initial term of two years, with annual renewals to be approved by the Companys Board of Directors. The contract can be terminated by the Companys Board of Directors or stockholders with 60 days notice, with no penalty for termination. The collateral management agreement that the Company has entered into with Saratoga CLO, on the other hand, has no renewal requirement, and can be terminated without cause with the approval of two-thirds of each of the class of CLO securities, excluding votes from interested noteholders. Furthermore, the Saratoga CLO collateral management agreement cannot be terminated with cause without the approval of a majority of all of the CLO security holders voting collectively, excluding votes from interested noteholders. If the Saratoga CLO collateral management agreement is terminated, the manager remains in place until a new manager is appointed by the issuer at the direction of a majority of the noteholders, and so long as such replacement is not rejected within 20 days by the most senior class of the Saratoga CLO securities. We receive a senior collateral management fee of 0.10% and a subordinate collateral management fee of 0.40% of the outstanding principal amount of Saratoga CLOs assets, paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee equal to 20.0% of excess cash flow to the extent the Saratoga CLO subordinated notes receive an internal rate of return paid in cash equal to or greater than 12.0%.
The securities issued by the Saratoga CLO do not have any external credit enhancement features that would minimize the potential losses to the subordinated notes. Saratoga CLO recognized a loss of approximately $2.8 million in October 2013 upon the refinancing as a result of the legal and accounting costs associated with the refinancing and the divestiture of certain Saratoga CLO loans not eligible for the refinanced Saratoga CLO. The cost of the refinancing was effectively borne by the Company as the holder of the subordinated notes in Saratoga CLO. The indenture for the Saratoga CLO does not contemplate the issuance of additional securities while the existing Saratoga CLO securities remain outstanding. The indenture could be amended to allow the issuance of additional securities, which would require consents of the holders of the Saratoga CLO debt securities and the approval of the rating agencies. The Saratoga CLO could issue additional securities pursuant to a refinancing of the existing securities. The costs of any such future refinancing would effectively be borne by us as the holder of the subordinated notes in Saratoga CLO.
The Company does not believe that any representations or warranties made by the Company as manager of Saratoga CLO or investor in the subordinated notes could materially affect the Company. However, because the Company acts as the collateral manager to Saratoga CLO, it may be subject to claims by third-party investors in Saratoga CLO for alleged or actual negligent acts, errors or omissions or breach of fiduciary duties committed in the scope of performing its services as the collateral manager.
As of November 30, 2016, the Saratoga CLO portfolio consisted of $297.5 million in aggregate principal amount of primarily senior secured first lien term loans 98.4% of the Saratoga CLO portfolio consisted of such loans at November 30, 2016, to 181 borrowers with an average exposure to each borrower of $1.6 million. The weighted average maturity of the portfolio is 4.3 years. In addition, Saratoga CLO held $16.0 million in cash at November 30, 2016. Our investment in Saratoga CLO falls into our 30% bucket of non-qualifying assets under the 1940 Act and currently has a cost basis of approximately $10.9 million, which is net of all principal payments made by Saratoga CLO on the Companys initial $30 million investment in Saratoga CLO.
Prospective portfolio company characteristics
Our investment adviser generally selects portfolio companies with one or more of the following characteristics:
| a history of generating stable earnings and strong free cash flow; |
| well-constructed balance sheets, supported by sustainable enterprise values; |
| reasonable debt-to-cash flow multiples; |
| industry leadership with competitive advantages and sustainable market shares and growth prospects in attractive and healthy sectors; and |
| capital structures that provide appropriate terms and reasonable covenants. |
97
Investment selection
In managing us, Saratoga Investment Advisors employs the same investment philosophy and portfolio management methodologies used by Saratoga Partners. Through this investment selection process, based on quantitative and qualitative analysis, Saratoga Investment Advisors seeks to identify portfolio companies with superior fundamental risk-reward profiles and strong, defensible business franchises with the goal of minimizing principal losses while maximizing risk-adjusted returns. Saratoga Investment Advisors investment process emphasizes the following:
| bottoms-up, company-specific research and analysis; |
| capital preservation, low volatility and minimization of downside risk; and |
| investing with experienced management teams that hold meaningful equity ownership in their businesses. |
Our investment advisers investment process generally includes the following steps:
| Initial screening. A brief analysis identifies the investment opportunity and reviews the merits of the transaction. The initial screening memorandum provides a brief description of the company, its industry, competitive position, capital structure, financials, equity sponsor and deal economics. If the deal is determined to be attractive by the senior members of the deal team, the opportunity is fully analyzed. |
| Full analysis. A full analysis includes: |
| Business and Industry analysisa review of the companys business position, competitive dynamics within its industry, cost and growth drivers and technological and geographic factors. Business and industry research often includes meetings with industry experts, consultants, other investors, customers and competitors. |
| Company analysisa review of the companys historical financial performance, future projections, cash flow characteristics, balance sheet strength, liquidation value, legal, financial and accounting risks, contingent liabilities, market share analysis and growth prospects. |
| Structural/security analysisa thorough legal document analysis including but not limited to an assessment of financial and negative covenants, events of default, enforceability of liens and voting rights. |
| Approval of the investment committee. The investment is then presented to the investment committee for approval. The investment committee must unanimously approve all investments in excess of $1 million made by us. In addition, all sales of our investments must be approved by all four of our investment committee members. The members of our investment committee are Christian L. Oberbeck, Michael J. Grisius, Thomas V. Inglesby, and Charles G. Phillips. |
Investment structure
In general, our Investment Adviser intends to select investments with financial covenants and terms that reduce leverage over time, thereby enhancing credit quality. These methods include:
| maintenance leverage covenants requiring a decreasing ratio of debt to cash flow; |
| maintenance cash flow covenants requiring an increasing ratio of cash flow to the sum of interest expense and capital expenditures; and |
| debt incurrence prohibitions, limiting a companys ability to re-lever. |
98
In addition, limitations on asset sales and capital expenditures should prevent a company from changing the nature of its business or capitalization without our consent.
Our investment adviser seeks, where appropriate, to limit the downside potential of our investments by:
| requiring a total return on our investments (including both interest and potential equity appreciation) that compensates us for credit risk; |
| requiring companies to use a portion of their excess cash flow to repay debt; |
| selecting investments with covenants that incorporate call protection as part of the investment structure; and |
| selecting investments with affirmative and negative covenants, default penalties, lien protection, change of control provisions and board rights, including either observation or participation rights. |
Valuation process
We account for our investments at fair value in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), as approved in good faith using written policies and procedures adopted by our board of directors. Investments for which market quotations are readily available are recorded in our consolidated financial statements at such market quotations subject to any decision by our board of directors to approve a fair value determination to reflect significant events affecting the value of these investments. We value investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair value as approved in good faith by our board of directors based on input from Saratoga Investment Advisors, our audit committee and an independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors. Determinations of fair value may involve subjective judgments and estimates. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, market yield trend analysis, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.
Our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO is carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for similar collateralized loan obligation fund subordinated notes or equity, when available. Specifically, we use Intex cash flow models, or an appropriate substitute, to form the basis for Saratoga CLOs valuation. The Intex cash flow models use a set of assumptions including projected default rates, recovery rates, reinvestment rate and prepayment rates in order to arrive at estimated cash flows. The assumptions are based on available market data and projections provided by third parties as well as management estimates. We use the output from the Intex models (i.e., the estimated cash flows from our investment in Saratoga CLO) to perform a discounted cash flow analysis on expected future cash flows from our investment in Saratoga CLO to determine a valuation for the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO held by us.
We undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter when valuing investments for which market quotations are not readily available, as described below:
| each investment is initially valued by the responsible investment professionals of Saratoga Investment Advisors and preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with our senior management; and |
| an independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors independently values at least one quarter of our investments each quarter so that the valuation of each investment for which market quotes are not readily available is independently valued by an independent valuation firm at least annually. |
99
In addition, all our investments are subject to the following valuation process:
| the audit committee of our board of directors reviews each preliminary valuation and our investment adviser and independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee; and |
| our board of directors discusses the valuations and approves the fair value of each investment in good faith based on the input of our investment adviser, independent valuation firm (to the extent applicable) and the audit committee of our board of directors. |
Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The determination of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.
Ongoing relationships with and monitoring of portfolio companies
Saratoga Investment Advisors will closely monitor each investment we make and, when appropriate, will conduct a regular dialogue with both the management team and other debtholders and seek specifically tailored financial reporting. In addition, in certain circumstances, senior investment professionals of Saratoga Investment Advisors may take board seats or board observation seats.
Distributions
Our distributions, if any, will be determined by our board of directors and paid out of assets legally available for distribution. Any such distributions generally will be taxable to our stockholders, including to those stockholders who receive additional shares of our common stock pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. Prior to January 2009, we paid quarterly dividends to our stockholders. However, in January 2009, we suspended the practice of paying quarterly dividends to our stockholders and thereafter paid five annual dividend distributions (December 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) to our stockholders since such time, which distributions were made with a combination of cash and the issuance of shares of our common stock as discussed more fully below.
On September 24, 2014, we announced the recommencement of quarterly dividends to our stockholders, and have subsequently made distributions under this new policy. We have adopted a DRIP that provides for reinvestment of our dividend distributions on behalf of our stockholders unless a stockholder elects to receive cash. As a result, if our board of directors authorizes, and we declare, a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not opted out of the DRIP by the dividend record date will have their cash dividends automatically reinvested into additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash dividends. We have the option to satisfy the share requirements of the DRIP through the issuance of new shares of common stock or through open market purchases of common stock by the DRIP plan administrator.
In order to maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must for each fiscal year distribute an amount equal to at least 90.0% of our ordinary net taxable income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, reduced by deductible expenses. In addition, we will be subject to federal excise taxes to the extent we do not distribute during the calendar year at least (1) 98.0% of our ordinary income for the calendar year, (2) 98.2% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year and (3) any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years that were not distributed during such years and on which we paid no federal income tax. For the 2015 calendar year, we made distributions sufficient such that we did not incur any federal excise taxes. We may elect to withhold from distribution a portion of our ordinary income for the 2016 calendar year and/or portion of the capital gains in
100
excess of capital losses realized during the one year period ending October 31, 2016, if any, and, if we do so, we would expect to incur federal excise taxes as a result.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically opt out of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends.
We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in cash or shares of our common stock at the election of each stockholder. Under certain applicable provisions of the Code and the Treasury regulations, distributions payable in cash or in shares of stock at the election of stockholders are treated as taxable dividends. The Internal Revenue Service has issued private rulings indicating that this rule will apply even where the total amount of cash that may be distributed is limited to no more than 20.0% of the total distribution. Under these rulings, if too many stockholders elect to receive their distributions in cash, each such stockholder would receive a pro rata share of the total cash to be distributed and would receive the remainder of their distribution in shares of stock. If we decide to make any distributions consistent with these rulings that are payable in part in our stock, taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend (whether received in cash, our stock, or a combination thereof) as ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in stock. In addition, if a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of our stock.
Competition
Our primary competitors in providing financing to private middle market companies include public and private investment funds (including private equity funds, mezzanine funds, BDCs and SBICs), commercial and investment banks and commercial financing companies. Additionally, alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, frequently invest in middle-market companies. As a result, competition for investment opportunities at middle-market companies can be intense. However, we continue to believe that there has been an overall reduction in the amount of debt capital available on average since the downturn in the credit markets, which began in mid-2007, and that this has resulted in a somewhat less competitive environment for making new investments. While many middle-market companies were previously able to raise senior debt financing through traditional large financial institutions, we believe this approach to financing is more difficult as implementation of U.S. and international financial reforms, such as Basel 3, limits the capacity of large financial institutions to hold non-investment grade leveraged loans on their balance sheets. We believe that many of these financial institutions have de-emphasized their service and product offerings to middle-market companies in particular.
Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial and marketing resources than us. For example, some competitors may have access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which may allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC. We use the industry information available to the investment professionals of Saratoga Investment Advisors to assess investment risks and determine appropriate pricing for our investments in portfolio companies. In addition, we believe that the investment professionals of our investment adviser enable us to learn about, and compete effectively for, financing opportunities with attractive leveraged companies in the industries in which we seek to invest.
101
For additional information concerning the competitive risks we face, please see Part I, Item 1A, Risk FactorsWe operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.
Staffing
We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees in the future. Services necessary for our business are provided by individuals who are employees of Saratoga Investment Advisors, pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement and the administration agreement. For a discussion of the Management Agreement, see BusinessInvestment Advisory and Management Agreement below. We reimburse Saratoga Investment Advisors for our allocable portion of expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the cost of our officers and their respective staffs, subject to certain limitations. For a discussion of the administration agreement, see BusinessAdministration Agreement below.
Derivatives
We may utilize hedging techniques such as interest rate swaps to mitigate potential interest rate risk on our indebtedness. Such interest rate swaps would principally be used to protect us against higher costs on our indebtedness resulting from increases in both short-term and long-term interest rates.
We also may use various hedging and other risk management strategies to seek to manage various risks, including changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Such hedging strategies would be utilized to seek to protect the value of our portfolio investments, for example, against possible adverse changes in the market value of securities held in our portfolio.
102
The following table sets forth certain information as of November 30, 2016 for each portfolio company in which we had a debt or equity investment. Other than these investments, our only relationships with our portfolio companies are the managerial assistance we may separately provide to our portfolio companies, which services would be ancillary to our investments, and the board observer or participation rights we may receive.
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Non-control/Non-affiliated investments - 205.4% (b) |
||||||||||||||||||||
CAMP International Systems (d) |
Aerospace and Defense | Second Lien Term Loan (L+7.25%), 8.25% Cash, 8/18/2024 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,171 | 1,020,000 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Aerospace and Defense | 995,171 | 1,020,000 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Polar Holding Company, Ltd. (a), (d), (i) |
Building Products | First Lien Term Loan (L+9.00%), 10.00% Cash, 9/30/2016 | $ | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Building Products | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Apex Holdings Software Technologies, LLC |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+8.00%), 9.00% Cash, 9/21/2021 | $ | 18,000,000 | 17,848,031 | 17,842,500 | 14.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC (g) |
Business Services | Common Stock | 100,000 | 100,000 | 251,000 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+8.25%), 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 | $ | 2,279,278 | 2,257,229 | 2,279,278 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC (j), (k) |
Business Services | Delayed Draw Term Loan A (L+8.25%), 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 | $ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
BMC Software, Inc. (d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+4.00%), 5.00% Cash, 9/10/2020 | $ | 5,626,667 | 5,594,987 | 5,493,315 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Courion Corporation |
Business Services | Second Lien Term Loan (L+10.00%), 11.00% Cash, 6/1/2021 | $ | 15,000,000 | 14,872,231 | 13,932,000 | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Dispensing Dynamics International (d) |
Business Services | Senior Secured Note 12.50% Cash, 1/1/2018 | $ | 12,000,000 | 12,015,235 | 11,640,000 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Easy Ice, LLC (d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+8.75%), 9.50% Cash, 1/15/2020 | $ | 16,000,000 | 15,876,901 | 16,080,000 | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, L.L.C. |
Business Services | Senior Secured Note (L+8.50%), 10.00% Cash, 1/23/2020 | $ | 3,300,000 | 3,277,195 | 3,318,810 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, L.L.C. (g) |
Business Services | Warrant Membership Interests, Expires 12/28/2022 | 49,318 | 400,000 | 476,541 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Erwin, Inc. |
Business Services | Second Lien Term Loan (L+11.50%), 13.50% (11.50% Cash/1.00% PIK), 8/28/2021 | $ | 13,077,419 | 12,957,650 | 13,077,419 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||
GreyHeller LLC |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+11.00%), 12.00% Cash, 11/16/2021 | $ | 7,000,000 | 6,930,320 | 6,930,000 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
GreyHeller LLC (j), (k) |
Business Services | Delayed Draw Term Loan B (L+11.00%), 12.00% Cash, 11/16/2021 | $ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
GreyHeller LLC (g) |
Business Services | Common Stock | 850,000 | 850,000 | 850,000 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc. (Help/Systems, LLC) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+5.25%), 6.25% Cash, 10/8/2021 | $ | 4,962,500 | 4,878,301 | 4,921,311 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc. (Help/Systems, LLC) |
Business Services | Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.50%), 10.50% Cash, 10/8/2022 | $ | 3,000,000 | 2,919,579 | 2,820,000 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems |
Business Services | Convertible Promissory Note 13.50% (6.75% Cash/6.75% PIK), 8/18/2018 | 611,517 | 611,521 | 611,521 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems (g) |
Business Services | Common Stock Class A Units | 232,616 | 232,616 | 549,258 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+9.25%), 12.00% (9.25% Cash/1.75% PIK) 12/18/2020 | $ | 10,248,887 | 10,172,877 | 10,248,887 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Knowland Technology Holdings, L.L.C. |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+8.75%), 9.75% Cash, 11/29/2017 | $ | 17,777,730 | 17,664,387 | 17,777,730 | 13.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Microsystems Company |
Business Services | Second Lien Term Loan (L+10.00%), 11.00% Cash, 7/1/2022 | $ | 8,000,000 | 7,924,524 | 7,920,000 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., LLC (d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan, 14.00% (12.00% Cash/2.00% PIK), 3/6/2018 | $ | 8,877,910 | 8,826,316 | 8,877,910 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., LLC (d), (g) |
Business Services | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests, Expires 5/31/2025 | 343 | | 352,260 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Business Services | 146,209,900 | 146,249,740 | 114.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc. (d), (g) |
Consumer Products | Common Stock | 210,456 | 1,791,242 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc. (d) |
Consumer Products | Second Lien Term Loan A-2 15.00% PIK, 12/31/2019 | $ | 228,909 | 228,909 | 228,909 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc. (d) |
Consumer Products | Second Lien Term Loan B 15.00% PIK, 12/31/2019 | $ | 686,726 | 686,726 | 558,171 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Products | 2,706,877 | 787,080 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
My Alarm Center, LLC |
Consumer Services | Second Lien Term Loan (L+11.00%), 12.00% Cash, 7/9/2019 | $ | 9,375,000 | 9,357,973 | 9,345,938 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc. (d) |
Consumer Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+5.25%), 6.50% Cash, 7/1/2019 | $ | 1,488,754 | 1,483,515 | 1,487,266 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc. (d) |
Consumer Services | Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.25%), 10.25% Cash, 7/1/2020 | $ | 10,000,000 | 9,968,634 | 9,904,000 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Services | 20,810,122 | 20,737,204 | 16.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., L.L.C. (d), (g) |
Education | Class A Common Stock | 544,761 | 30,241 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., L.L.C. (d) |
Education | First Lien Term Loan 1.00% Cash, 3/31/2018 | $ | 2,321,073 | 1,193,790 | 8,087 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Teachers of Tomorrow, LLC (g), (h) |
Education | Common Stock | 750 | 750,000 | 910,545 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Teachers of Tomorrow, LLC |
Education | Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.75%), 10.75% Cash, 6/2/2021 | $ | 10,000,000 | 9,914,485 | 10,000,000 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Education | 11,888,516 | 10,918,632 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TM Restaurant Group L.L.C. |
Food and Beverage | First Lien Term Loan (L+8.50%), 9.75% Cash, 7/16/2017 | $ | 9,358,694 | 9,313,879 | 8,422,825 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Food and Beverage | 9,313,879 | 8,422,825 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, Inc. |
Healthcare Services | First Lien Term Loan B (L+10.00%), 11.00% Cash, 7/24/2019 | $ | 11,250,000 | 11,114,850 | 10,871,661 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, Inc. (g), (h) |
Healthcare Services | Limited Partner Interests | 999 | 999,000 | 725,936 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, Inc. (d), (g) |
Healthcare Services | Common Stock | 5,081 | 508,077 | 678,931 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, Inc. |
Healthcare Services | Second Lien Term Loan 11.25% Cash, 9/26/2019 | $ | 4,200,000 | 4,151,963 | 4,154,220 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Ohio Medical, LLC (g) |
Healthcare Services | Common Stock | 5,000 | 500,000 | 329,096 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Ohio Medical, LLC |
Healthcare Services | Senior Subordinated Note 12.00%, 7/15/2021 | $ | 7,300,000 | 7,235,173 | 7,234,300 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Zest Holdings, LLC (d) |
Healthcare Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+4.75%), 5.75% Cash, 8/16/2020 | $ | 4,136,911 | 4,081,904 | 4,134,015 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Healthcare Services | 28,590,967 | 28,128,159 | 22.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 5/16/2019 | $ | 8,581,357 | 8,485,902 | 8,581,357 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | Delayed Draw First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 5/16/2019 | $ | 4,800,000 | 4,748,026 | 4,800,000 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC (g) |
Media | Class A Series, Expires 1/16/2025 | 4,264 | 61,647 | 282,106 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC (g) |
Media | Class A Warrant, Expires 1/16/2025 | 30,320 | 438,353 | 1,616,966 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC (g) |
Media | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests (Common), Expires 5/16/2024 | 57,872 | | 2,791,745 | 2.2 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC (g) |
Media | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests (Preferred), Expires 5/16/2024 | 8,139 | | 449,761 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Media | 13,733,928 | 18,521,935 | 14.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C. (d), (g) |
Metals | Common Stock | 35,000 | 9,217,564 | 357,350 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C. (d) |
Metals | Revolver (L+8.50%), 10.00% Cash, 3/31/2017 | $ | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Metals | 17,717,564 | 8,857,350 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Mercury Network, LLC |
Real Estate | First Lien Term Loan 10.5% Cash, 8/24/2021 | $ | 15,791,286 | 15,649,233 | 15,871,821 | 12.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Mercury Network, LLC (g) |
Real Estate | Common Stock | 413,043 | 413,043 | 789,031 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Real Estate | 16,062,276 | 16,660,852 | 13.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Sub Total Non-control/Non-affiliated investments |
270,029,200 | 262,303,777 | 205.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Control investments - 12.0% (b) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (a), (d), (e), (f) |
Structured Finance Securities | Other/Structured Finance Securities 13.26%, 10/17/2025 | $ | 30,000,000 | 10,948,369 | 10,986,945 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. Class F Note (a), (d), (f) |
Structured Finance Securities | Other/Structured Finance Securities (L+8.50%), 9.22%, 10/20/2025 | $ | 4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | 4,279,050 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub Total Control investments |
15,448,369 | 15,265,995 | 12.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 217.4% (b) |
$ | 285,477,569 | $ | 277,569,772 | 217.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Principal | Cost | Fair Value | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts - 18.2% |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Bank Money Market (l) |
$ | 23,291,512 | $ | 23,291,512 | $ | 23,291,512 | 18.2 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
$ | 23,291,512 | $ | 23,291,512 | $ | 23,291,512 | 18.2 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Represents a non-qualifying investment as defined under Section 55 (a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Non-qualifying assets represent 6.2% of the Companys portfolio at fair value. As a BDC, the Company can only invest 30% of its portfolio in non-qualifying assets. |
(b) | Percentages are based on net assets of $127,679,730 as of November 30, 2016. |
(c) | Because there is no readily available market value for these investments, the fair value of these investments is approved in good faith by our board of directors (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(d) | These securities are pledged as collateral under a senior secured revolving credit facility (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(e) | This investment does not have a stated interest rate that is payable thereon. As a result, the 13.26% interest rate in the table above represents the effective interest rate currently earned on the investment cost and is based on the current cash interest and other income generated by the investment. |
(f) | As defined in the Investment Company Act, we Control this portfolio company because we own more than 25% of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the period in which the issuer was both an Affiliate and a portfolio company that we Control are as follows: |
Company |
Purchases | Redemptions | Sales (Cost) |
Interest Income |
Management Fee Income |
Net Realized Gains/ (Losses) |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,569,492 | $ | 1,123,559 | $ | | $ | 241,347 | ||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. Class F Note |
$ | 4,500,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 18,433 | $ | | $ | | $ | (220,950 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) | Non-income producing at November 30, 2016. |
(h) | Includes securities issued by an affiliate of the Company. |
(i) | Non-U.S. company. The principal place of business for Polar Holding Company, Ltd. is Canada. |
(j) | The investment has an unfunded commitment as of November 30, 2016 (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(k) | The entire commitment was unfunded at November 30, 2016. As such, no interest is being earned on this investment. |
(l) | Included within cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of November 30, 2016. |
105
Set forth is a brief description of each portfolio company in which the fair value of our investment represents greater than 5% of our total assets as of November 30, 2016.
MN Acquisition, LLC
Mercury Network is a SaaS-based appraisal vendor management platform that helps lenders and appraisal management companies manage their entire appraisal workflow in compliance with appraisal independence standards.
Apex Holdings Software Technologies, LLC
Apex provides multi-tenant payroll and HR software to small- to medium-sized companies across a variety of industries, including manufacturing, healthcare, retail and restaurants.
Easy Ice, LLC
For a fixed monthly fee, Easy Ice rents an ice machine to its customers, services the machines as needed and provides bags of back-up ice during breakdowns or emergencies; this differs from a lease in that there is no specified term (the subscription is month-to-month) and the customers do not have an option to buy their machines. Easy Ice prices its monthly subscriptions to be competitive with a lease and differentiates itself with the added guarantee of ice delivery should the machine break down.
HMN Holdco, LLC
Health Media Network, LLC is a Connecticut-based point-of-care media company that delivers educational and health content for physicians, patients, and caregivers in physician waiting rooms at health facilities, hospitals, and other group practices. The Company also provides in-office brochure distribution, poster/wallboard display networks, mobile marketing, and custom publishing services for advertisers.
Knowland Technology Holdings, LLC
The Knowland Group is the leading advanced data and profiling company in the hospitality industry. The Company has created the industrys most extensive database of events, organizations that hold these events, and the key contacts who book them. Using this data, Knowland has developed and continues to enhance a suite of sophisticated products that cater to its hotel clients. These products allow hotels to maximize revenue from their meeting and conference space.
106
Saratoga Investment Advisors serves as our investment adviser. Our investment adviser was formed in 2010 as a Delaware limited liability company and became our investment adviser in July 2010. Subject to the overall supervision of our board of directors, Saratoga Investment Advisors manages our day-to-day operations and provides investment advisory and management services to us. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors:
| determines the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such changes; |
| identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments we make (including performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio companies); |
| closes and monitors the investments we make; and |
| determines the securities and other assets that we purchase, retain or sell. |
Saratoga Investment Advisors services under the Management Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities.
Management Fee and Incentive Fee
Pursuant to the Management Agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, we pay Saratoga Investment Advisors a fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of two componentsa base management fee and an incentive fee.
The base management fee is paid quarterly in arrears, and equals 1.75% per annum of our gross assets (other than cash or cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) and calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter based on the average value of our gross assets (other than cash or cash equivalents, but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) as of the end of such fiscal quarter and the end of the immediate prior fiscal quarter.
The incentive fee has the following two parts:
The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. Pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence, managerial and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal quarter, minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the administration agreement, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock or debt security, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as market discount, debt instruments with payment-in-kind interest, preferred stock with payment-in-kind dividends and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses, unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation, or realized gains or losses resulting from the extinguishment of our own debt. Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets (defined as total assets less liabilities) at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, is compared to a hurdle rate of 1.875% per quarter, subject to a catch up provision. The base management fee is calculated prior to giving effect to the payment of any incentive fees.
We pay Saratoga Investment Advisors an incentive fee with respect to our pre-incentive fee net investment income in each fiscal quarter as follows: (A) no incentive fee in any fiscal quarter in which our pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the hurdle rate; (B) 100% of our pre-incentive fee net investment
107
income with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.344% in any fiscal quarter is payable to Saratoga Investment Advisors; and (C) 20% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 2.344% in any fiscal quarter. We refer to the amount specified in clause (B) as the catch-up. The catch-up provision is intended to provide Saratoga Investment Advisors with an incentive fee of 20% on all of our pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds 2.344% in any fiscal quarter. There is no accumulation of amounts from quarter to quarter on either the hurdle rate or the parameters set by the catch-up mechanism or any clawback of amounts previously paid to Saratoga Investment Advisers if subsequent quarters are below the quarterly hurdle or the catch-up parameters. Furthermore, there is no delay of payment to Saratoga Investment Advisers if prior quarters are below the quarterly hurdle or catch-up. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any period ending on or prior to December 31, 2010, Saratoga Investment Advisors was only entitled to 20% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeded 1.875% in any fiscal quarter without any catch-up provision. These calculations are appropriately pro-rated when such calculations are applicable for any period of less than three months.
The following is a graphical representation of the calculation of the income-related portion of the incentive fee subsequent to any period ending after December 31, 2010:
Quarterly Incentive Fee Based on Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
(expressed as a percentage of the value of net assets)
Percentage of Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income allocated to income-related portion of incentive fee
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or, upon termination of the Management Agreement), and is calculated at the end of each applicable fiscal year by subtracting (1) the sum of our cumulative aggregate realized capital losses and aggregate unrealized capital depreciation on our investments from (2) our cumulative aggregate realized capital gains on our investments, in each case calculated from May 31, 2010. If such amount is positive at the end of such year, then the capital gains fee for such year is equal to 20% of such amount, less the cumulative aggregate amount of capital gains fees paid in all prior years. If such amount is negative, then there is no capital gains fee for such year. Realized gains or losses resulting from the extinguishment of our own debt do not impact the capital gains fee payable to Saratoga Investment Advisors under the Management Agreement.
Under the Management Agreement, the capital gains portion of the incentive fee is based on realized gains and realized and unrealized losses from May 31, 2010. Therefore, realized and unrealized losses incurred prior to such time will not be taken into account when calculating the capital gains portion of the incentive fee, and Saratoga Investment Advisors will be entitled to 20% of net capital gains that arise after May 31, 2010. In addition, the cost basis for computing our realized gains and losses on investments held by us as of May 31, 2010 equals the fair value of such investments as of such date.
108
Examples of Quarterly Incentive Fee Calculation
Example 1: Income Related Portion of Incentive Fee(1):
Assumptions
| Hurdle rate(2) = 1.875% |
| Management fee(3) = 0.4375% |
| Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(4) = 0.33% |
Alternative 1
Additional Assumptions
| Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 1.25% |
| Pre-incentive fee net investment income (investment income (management fee + other expenses)) = 0.4825% |
Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed hurdle rate, therefore there is no incentive fee.
Alternative 2
Additional Assumptions
| Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 3.0% |
| Pre-incentive fee net investment income (investment income (management fee + other expenses)) = 2.2325% |
Pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds hurdle rate, but does not fully satisfy the catch-up provision, therefore the income related portion of the incentive fee is 0.3575%.
Incentive Fee | = | (100% × (pre-incentive fee net investment income 1.875%) | ||
= | 100%(2.2325% 1.875%) | |||
= | 100%(0.3575%) | |||
= | 0.3575% |
(1) | The hypothetical amount of pre-incentive fee net investment income shown is based on a percentage of total net assets. |
(2) | Represents hurdle rate. |
(3) | Represents 1.75% annualized management fee. For the purposes of this example, we have assumed that we have not incurred any indebtedness and that we maintain no cash or cash equivalents. |
(4) | The catch-up provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an incentive fee of 20% on all pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our net investment income exceeds 2.344% in any fiscal quarter. |
Alternative 3
Additional Assumptions
| Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 3.5% |
| Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (investment income (management fee + other expenses) = 2.7325% |
109
Pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds the hurdle rate, and fully satisfies the catch-up provision, therefore the income related portion of the incentive fee is 0.5467%.
Incentive fee | = | 100% × pre-incentive fee net investment income (subject to catch-up)(4) | ||
Incentive fee | = | 100% × catch-up+ (20% × (Pre-incentive fee net investment income 2.344%)) | ||
Catch up | = | 2.344% 1.875% | ||
= | 0.469% | |||
Incentive fee | = | (100% × 0.469%)+(20% ×(2.7325% 2.344%)) | ||
= | 0.469% + (20% × 0.3885%) | |||
= | 0.469% + 0.0777% | |||
= | 0.5467% |
Example 2: Capital Gains Portion of Incentive Fee:
Alternative 1:
Assumptions(1)
(1) | The examples assume that Investment A and Investment B were acquired by us subsequent to May 31, 2010. If Investment A and B were acquired by us prior to May 31, 2010, then the cost basis for computing our realized gains and losses on such investments would equal the fair value of such investments as of May 31, 2010. |
| Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (Investment A), and $30 million investment made in Company B (Investment B) |
| Year 2: Investment A is sold for $50 million and fair market value (FMV) of Investment B determined to be $32 million |
| Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million |
| Year 4: Investment B sold for $31 million |
The capital gains portion of the incentive fee, if any, calculated under the cumulative method would be:
| Year 1: None |
| Year 2: $6 million (20% multiplied by $30 million realized capital gains on sale of Investment A) |
| Year 3: None; $5 million (20% multiplied by ($30 million realized cumulative capital gains less $5 million cumulative capital depreciation)) less $6 million (capital gains incentive fee paid in Year 2) |
| Year 4: $200,000; $6.2 million (20% multiplied by $31 million cumulative realized capital gains) less $6 million (capital gains incentive fee paid in Year 2) |
Alternative 2
Assumptions(1)
| Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (Investment A), $30 million investment made in Company B (Investment B) and $25 million investment made in Company C (Investment C) |
| Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million, FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million and FMV of Investment C determined to be $25 million |
| Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $27 million and Investment C sold for $30 million |
| Year 4: FMV of Investment B determined to be $35 million |
| Year 5: Investment B sold for $20 million |
110
The capital gains portion of the incentive fee, if any, calculated under the cumulative method would be:
| Year 1: None |
| Year 2: $5 million (20% multiplied by $25 million ($30 million realized capital gains on Investment A less $5 million unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B)) |
| Year 3: $1.4 million ($6.4 million (20% multiplied by $32 million ($35 million cumulative realized capital gains less $3 million unrealized capital depreciation)) less $5 million (capital gains incentive fee paid in Year 2)) |
| Year 4: None |
| Year 5: None ($5 million (20% multiplied by $25 million (cumulative realized capital gains of $35 million less realized capital losses of $10 million)) less $6.4 million (cumulative capital gains incentive fee paid in Year 2 and Year 3)) |
Board Approval of the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement
The Management Agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors was approved by our board of directors at an in-person meeting of the directors, including a majority of our independent directors, and was approved by our stockholders at the special meeting of stockholders held on July 30, 2010.
In approving this agreement, the directors considered, among other things, (i) the nature, extent and quality of the advisory and other services to be provided to us by Saratoga Investment Advisors; (ii) our investment performance and the investment performance of Saratoga Investment Advisors; (iii) the expected costs of the services to be provided by Saratoga Investment Advisors (including management fees, advisory fees and expense ratios) and the profits expected to be realized by Saratoga Investment Advisors; (iv) the limited potential for economies of scale in investment management associated with managing us; and (v) Saratoga Investment Advisors estimated pro forma profitability with respect to managing us. On July 7, 2016, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Management Agreement for an additional one-year term at an in-person meeting.
Payment of our expenses
The Management Agreement provides that all investment professionals of Saratoga Investment Advisors and its staff, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services required to be provided by Saratoga Investment Advisors, and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, will be provided and paid for by Saratoga Investment Advisors and not by us.
We bear all costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including those relating to:
| organization; |
| calculating our net asset value (including the cost and expenses of any independent valuation firm); |
| expenses incurred by Saratoga Investment Advisors payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or other advisors, in monitoring financial and legal affairs for us and in monitoring our investments and performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio companies; |
| interest payable on debt, if any, incurred to finance our investments; |
| offerings of our common stock and other securities; |
| investment advisory and management fees; |
| fees payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or other advisors, relating to, or associated with, evaluating and making investments; |
111
| transfer agent and custodial fees; |
| federal and state registration fees; |
| all costs of registration and listing our common stock on any securities exchange; |
| federal, state and local taxes; |
| independent directors fees and expenses; |
| costs of preparing and filing reports or other documents required by governmental bodies (including the SEC and the SBA); |
| costs of any reports, proxy statements or other notices to common stockholders including printing costs; |
| our fidelity bond, directors and officers errors and omissions liability insurance, and any other insurance premiums; |
| direct costs and expenses of administration, including printing, mailing, long distance telephone, copying, secretarial and other staff, independent auditors and outside legal costs; and |
| administration fees and all other expenses incurred by us or, if applicable, the administrator in connection with administering our business (including payments under the administration agreement based upon our allocable portion of the administrators overhead in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and the allocable portion of the cost of our officers and their respective staffs (including travel expenses)). |
Duration and Termination
The Management Agreement will remain in effect continuously, unless terminated under the termination provisions of the agreement. The Management Agreement provides that it may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, upon 60 days written notice, by the vote of stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding voting securities, or by the vote of our directors or by Saratoga Investment Advisors.
The Management Agreement will, unless terminated as described above, continue in effect from year to year so long as it is approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the board of directors, or by the vote of stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding voting securities and (ii) the vote of a majority of our directors who are not parties to the Management Agreement or interested persons (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of any party to such agreement, in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act.
Indemnification
Under the Management Agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates are not liable to us for any action taken or omitted to be taken by Saratoga Investment Advisors in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser to us, except to the extent specified in Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act concerning loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty (as the same is finally determined by judicial proceedings) with respect to the receipt of compensation for services and except to the extent such action or omission constitutes gross negligence, willful misfeasance, bad faith or reckless disregard of its duties and obligations under the agreement.
We also provide indemnification to Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates for damages, liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by them in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser to us. However, we would not provide indemnification against any liability to us or our security holders to which Saratoga Investment Advisors or such affiliates would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of any such persons duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations under the agreement.
112
Organization of the Investment Adviser
Saratoga Investment Advisors is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The principal executive offices of Saratoga Investment Advisors are located at 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022.
Administration Agreement
Pursuant to a separate administration agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors, who also serves as our administrator, furnishes us with office facilities, equipment and clerical, book-keeping and record keeping services. Under the administration agreement, our administrator also performs, or oversees the performance of, our required administrative services, which include, among other things, being responsible for the financial records which we are required to maintain, preparing reports for our stockholders and reports required to be filed with the SEC. In addition, our administrator assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value, oversees the preparation and filing of our tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others. Payments under the administration agreement equal an amount based upon our allocable portion of our administrators overhead in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the cost of our officers and their respective staffs relating to the performance of services under this agreement (including travel expenses). Our allocable portion is based on the proportion that our total assets bears to the total assets administered or managed by our administrator. Under the administration agreement, our administrator also provides managerial assistance, on our behalf, to those portfolio companies who accept our offer of assistance. The administration agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days written notice to the other party. The amount payable by us under the administration agreement was initially capped at $1.0 million for each annual term of the agreement. On October 5, 2016, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Administration Agreement for an additional one-year term and determined to increase the cap on the payment or reimbursement of expenses by us thereunder to $1.5 million for the additional one-year term, effective November 1, 2016.
Indemnification
Under the administration agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates are not liable to us for any action taken or omitted to be taken by Saratoga Investment Advisors in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the agreement.
We also provide indemnification to Saratoga Investment Advisors and certain of its affiliates for damages, liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by them in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the agreement or otherwise as an administrator to us. However, we do not provide indemnification against any liability to us or our security holders to which Saratoga Investment Advisors or such affiliates would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of any such persons duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations under the agreement.
License Agreement
We entered into a trademark license agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, pursuant to which Saratoga Investment Advisors grants us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name Saratoga. Under this agreement, we have a right to use the Saratoga name, for so long as Saratoga Investment Advisors or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, we have no legal right to the Saratoga name. Saratoga Investment Advisors has the right to terminate the license agreement if it is no longer acting as our investment adviser. In the event the Management Agreement is terminated, we would be required to change our name to eliminate the use of the name Saratoga.
113
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors elects our officers who serve at its discretion. Our Board of Directors has five members, two of whom are interested persons as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act and five of whom are not interested persons, whom we refer to as our independent directors.
Director and Executive Officer Information
As of March 10, 2017, our executive officers, directors and key employees and their positions are as set forth below. The address for each executive officer and director is c/o Saratoga Investment Corp., 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022.
Name |
Age |
Position |
Director Since |
Expiration of Term |
||||||||
Interested Directors |
||||||||||||
Christian L. Oberbeck |
56 | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | 2010 | 2018 | ||||||||
Michael J. Grisius |
52 | President and Director | 2011 | 2017 | ||||||||
Independent Directors |
||||||||||||
Steven M. Looney |
66 | Director | 2007 | 2019 | ||||||||
Charles S. Whitman III |
74 | Director | 2007 | 2019 | ||||||||
G. Cabell Williams |
62 | Director | 2007 | 2017 | ||||||||
Name |
Age |
Position |
||||||||||
Executive Officers |
||||||||||||
Christian L. Oberbeck |
56 | Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||
Michael J. Grisius |
52 | President | ||||||||||
Henri J. Steenkamp |
40 | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer |
Biographical information regarding our Board and our executive officers is set forth below. We have divided the directors into two groupsindependent directors and interested directors. Interested directors are interested persons of Saratoga Investment Corp., as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. We do not currently have any other executive officers who are not also directors.
Biographical Information
Independent Directors
Steven M. LooneyMr. Looney, as the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, presides over the executive sessions of the non-employee and independent directors of the Company. Mr. Looney is a Managing Director of Peale Davies & Co. Inc., a consulting firm with particular expertise in financial process and IT outsourcing, and is a CPA and an attorney. Mr. Looney also serves as a consultant and director to numerous companies in the healthcare, manufacturing and technology services industries, including WH Industries Inc. Between 2000 and 2005, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PCCI, Inc., a private IT staffing and outsourcing firm. Between 1992 and 2000, Mr. Looney worked at WH Industries as Chief Financial and Administrative Officer. Mr. Looney also serves as a director of Excellent Education for Everyone, a nonprofit organization. Mr. Looney graduated summa cum laude from the University of Washington with a B.A. degree in Accounting and received a J.D. from the University of Washington School of Law where he was a member of the law review. Mr. Looneys qualifications as director include his experience as a Managing Director of Peale Davies & Co. Inc. and as Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of WH Industries, as well as his financial, accounting and legal expertise.
114
Charles S. Whitman IIIMr. Whitman is senior counsel (retired) at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP. Mr. Whitman was a partner in Davis Polks Corporate Department for 28 years, representing clients in a broad range of corporate finance matters, including shelf registrations, securities compliance for financial institutions, foreign asset privatizations, and mergers and acquisitions. From 1971 to 1973, Mr. Whitman served as Executive Assistant to three successive Chairmen of the SEC. Mr. Whitman graduated from Harvard College and graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School with a LL.B. Mr. Whitman also received an LL.M. from Cambridge University in England. Mr. Whitmans qualifications as director include his 28 years of experience representing clients, including AT&T, Exxon Mobil, General Motors and BP, in securities matters as a partner in Davis Polks corporate department.
G. Cabell WilliamsMr. Williams has served as the Managing General Partner of Williams and Gallagher, a private equity partnership located in Chevy Chase, Maryland since 2004. Mr. Williams is also a Senior Manager, Director of Farragut Capital Partners which is a Chevy Chase, Maryland based Mezzanine Fund. Since 2011, Mr. Williams has also served as a partner of Farragut Capital Partners, an investment firm based in Fairfax, VA. In 2004, Mr. Williams concluded a 23 year career at Allied Capital Corporation, a business development company based in Washington, DC, which was acquired by Ares Capital Corporation in 2010. While at Allied, Mr. Williams held a variety of positions, including President, COO and finally Managing Director following Allieds merger with its affiliates in 1998. From 1991 to 2004, Mr. Williams either led or co-managed the firms Private Equity Group. For the nine years prior to 1999, Mr. Williams led Allieds Mezzanine investment activities. For 15 years, Mr. Williams served on Allieds Investment Committee where he was responsible for reviewing and approving all of the firms investments. Prior to 1991, Mr. Williams ran Allieds Minority Small Business Investment Company. He also founded Allied Capital Commercial Corporation, a real estate investment vehicle. Mr. Williams has served on the Board of various public and private companies. Mr. Williams attended The Landon School, and graduated from Mercersburg Academy and Rollins College, receiving a B.S. in Business Administration from the latter. Mr. Williams qualifications as director include his over 25 years of experience managing investment activities at Allied Capital, where he served in a variety of positions, including President, COO and Managing Director.
Interested Directors
Christian L. OberbeckMr. Oberbeck has over 28 years of experience in leveraged finance, from private equity to distressed debt and has been involved in originating, structuring, negotiating, consummating, managing and monitoring investments in these businesses. Mr. Oberbeck is the Managing Partner of Saratoga Partners, a middle market private equity investment firm, and has served on its investment committee since 1995. Mr. Oberbeck is also the Managing Member of Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, the Companys investment adviser, and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Oberbeck also served as our President until February 2014.
Prior to assuming management responsibility for Saratoga Partners in 2008, Mr. Oberbeck has co-managed Saratoga Partners since 1995, when he joined Dillon Read and Saratoga Partners from Castle Harlan, Inc., a corporate buyout firm, which he had joined at its founding in 1987 and was a Managing Director, leading successful investments in manufacturing and financial services companies. Prior to joining that, he worked in the Corporate Development Group of Arthur Young and in corporate finance at Blyth Eastman Paine Webber. Mr. Oberbeck has been a director of numerous middle market companies.
Mr. Oberbeck graduated from Brown University in 1982 with a BS in Physics and a BA in Mathematics. In 1985, he earned an MBA from Columbia University. Mr. Oberbecks qualifications as a director include his extensive experience in the investment and finance industry, as well as his intimate knowledge of the Companys operations, gained through his service as an executive officer.
Michael J. GrisiusMr. Grisius has over 25 years of experience in leveraged finance, investment management and financial services. He has originated, structured, negotiated, consummated, managed and monitored numerous successful investments in mezzanine debt, private equity, senior debt, structured products
115
and commercial real estate debt. Mr. Grisius is Chief Investment Officer and a Managing Director of Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, the Companys investment adviser and was appointed President of the Company in February 2013. Mr. Grisius joined Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC in July 2011.
Prior to joining Saratoga Investment Advisors, Mr. Grisius served as Managing Director at Allied Capital Corporation, where he was an investment professional for 16 years. At Allied Capital Corporation, Mr. Grisius held several senior positions including co-head of Mezzanine Finance and member of its Management Committee and its Investment Committee. In 2008, Mr. Grisius was appointed co-chairman of the Allied Capital Corporations Investment Committee. He also had responsibility for structuring and managing Unitranche Fund, LLC. During his tenure at Allied, Mr. Grisius built and led teams that made investments in subordinated debt, control equity and real estate mortgage debt. Mr. Grisius has served on the board of directors of numerous middle market companies. Prior to joining Allied Capital Corp., Mr. Grisius worked in leveraged finance at Chemical Bank from 1989 to 1992 and held senior accountant and consultant positions with KPMG LLP from 1985 to 1988.
Mr. Grisius graduated with a BS from Georgetown University in 1985 and earned an MBA from Cornell Universitys Johnson Graduate School of Management in 1990. Mr. Grisius qualifications as a director include his broad experience in leverage finance, investment management, private equity and financial services.
Executive Officers
For information regarding Mr. Oberbeck, the Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Grisius, our President, see Interested directors above.
Henri J. Steenkamp. Mr. Steenkamp, 40 years old, served as the Chief Financial Officer of MF Global Holdings Ltd., a broker in commodities and derivatives, from April 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Steenkamp held the position of Chief Accounting Officer and Global Controller at MF Global for four years. He joined MF Global, then Man Financial, in 2006 as Vice President of External Reporting and Accounting Policy. After MF Global filed for bankruptcy protection in October 2011, he continued to serve as Chief Financial Officer through January 2013. Before joining MF Global, Mr. Steenkamp spent eight years with PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), including four years in Transaction Services in its New York office, managing a variety of capital-raising transactions on a global basis. His focus was also on the SEC registration and public company filing process, including technical accounting. He spent four years with PwC in South Africa, where he served as an auditor primarily for SEC registrants and assisted South African companies as they went public in the U.S. Mr. Steenkamp is a chartered accountant and holds an honors degree in Finance.
Board Leadership and the Boards Role in the Oversight of Risk Management
Our board of directors monitors and performs an oversight role with respect to the business and affairs of the Company, including with respect to investment practices and performance, compliance with regulatory requirements and the services, expenses and performance of service providers to the Company. Among other things, our board of directors approves the appointment of our investment adviser, administrator and officers; reviews and monitors the services and activities performed by our investment adviser, administrator and officers; and approves the engagement, and reviews the performance of, our independent public accounting firm.
Under our bylaws, the Board may designate a chairman to preside over the meetings of the Board and meetings of the stockholders and to perform such other duties as may be assigned to him by the Board. The Company does not have a fixed policy as to whether the chairman of the Board should be an independent director and believes that its flexibility to select its chairman and reorganize its leadership structure from time to time is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Mr. Oberbeck, who is an interested person of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, serves as our chief executive officer and chairman of the Board. The Board believes that Mr. Oberbeck, as chief
116
executive officer of the Company and as a principal of Saratoga Investment Advisors, is the director with the most knowledge of our business strategy and is best situated to serve as chairman of the Board. The Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that Mr. Steven M. Looney, as the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, shall preside over the executive sessions of the non-employee and independent directors of the Company. A stockholder or interested party that desires to communicate directly with the Board of Directors or one or more of its members concerning the affairs of the Company may direct the communication in written correspondence by letter to: Saratoga Investment Corp., attention Mr. Steven M. Looney, Chairman of the Audit Committee, 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022. We believe that our board leadership structure must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and that our existing board leadership structure is appropriate. However, we continually re-examine our corporate governance policies on an ongoing basis to ensure that they continue to meet our needs.
The Board, directly and through the audit committee and other committees of the Board, takes an active role in the oversight of the Companys policies with respect to the assessment and management of enterprise risk. Among other things, the Board has policies in place for identifying the senior executive responsible for key risks as well as the Board committees with oversight responsibility for particular key risks. In a number of cases, oversight is conducted by the full Board. Our Board also performs its risk oversight responsibilities with the assistance of the chief compliance officer. The chief compliance officer is designated to oversee compliance with the federal securities laws.
We believe that our Board and its committees role in risk oversight complements our Boards leadership structure because it allows our independent directors, through three fully independent board committees, auditor and independent valuation providers, our chief compliance officer, and otherwise, to exercise oversight of risk without any conflict that might discourage critical review. We believe that our board leadership structure and the Boards approach to risk oversight must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and that the Boards role in risk oversight is appropriate. However, we continually re-examine the manner in which the Board administers its oversight function on an ongoing basis to ensure that it continues to meet our needs.
Director Independence
In accordance with rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), the Board annually determines the independence of each director. No director is considered independent unless the Board has determined that he or she has no material relationship with the Company. The Company monitors the status of its directors and officers through the activities of the Companys Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and through a questionnaire to be completed by each director no less frequently than annually, with updates periodically if information provided in the most recent questionnaire has changed.
In order to evaluate the materiality of any such relationship, the Board uses the definition of director independence set forth in the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Section 303A.00 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual provides that business development companies, or BDCs, such as the Company, are required to comply with all of the provisions of Section 303A applicable to domestic issuers other than Sections 303A.02, the section that defines director independence. Section 303A.00 provides that a director of a BDC shall be considered to be independent if he or she is not an interested person of the Company, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act defines an interested person to include, among other things, any person who has, or within the last two years had, a material business or professional relationship with the Company.
The Board has determined that each of the directors is independent and has no relationship with the Company, except as a director and stockholder of the Company, with the exception of Messrs. Oberbeck and Grisius, who are interested persons of the Company due to their positions as officers of the Company and/or officers of Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, our external investment adviser.
117
Corporate Governance
We maintain a corporate governance webpage at the Corporate Governance link under the Investor Relations link at http://saratogainvestmentcorp.com.
Our Corporate Governance Procedures, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethics and Board committee charters are available at our corporate governance webpage at http://saratogainvestmentcorp.com and are also available to any stockholder who requests them by writing to our Interim Secretary, Henri J. Steenkamp, at Saratoga Investment Corp., 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022.
Annual Evaluation
Our directors perform an evaluation, at least annually, of the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. This evaluation includes an annual questionnaire and Board and Board committee discussion.
Board Meetings and Committees
Our Board met six times during fiscal year 2016. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which the director served that were held while the director was a member. The Boards standing committees are set forth below. We require each director to make a diligent effort to attend all Board and committee meetings, as well as each Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All of the five directors attended the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person.
Communications with Directors
Stockholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of the Board by mail. To communicate with the Board, any individual directors or any group or committee of directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board or any such individual directors or group or committee of directors by either name or title. All such correspondence should be sent to Saratoga Investment Corp., 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022, Attention: Secretary. Any communication to report potential issues regarding accounting, internal controls and other auditing matters will be directed to the Audit Committee. Appropriate personnel of the Company will review and sort through communications before forwarding them to the addressee(s).
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own 10.0% or more of our voting stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and 10.0% or more holders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of those forms furnished to us, or written representations that no such forms were required, we believe that our directors, executive officers and 10.0% or more beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during the year ended August 31, 2016.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to which applies to, among others, our executive officers, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as well as every officer, director and employee of the Company. Requests for copies should be sent in writing to Saratoga Investment Corp., 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022. The Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is also available on our website at http://saratogainvestmentcorp.com.
If we make any substantive amendment to, or grant a waiver from, a provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website at http://saratogainvestmentcorp.com.
118
Committees of the Board of Directors
Audit Committee
The current members of the audit committee are Steven M. Looney (Chairman), Charles S. Whitman III and G. Cabell Williams. The Board has determined that Mr. Looney is an audit committee financial expert as defined under Item 407 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that each of Messrs. Whitman and Williams are financially literate as required by NYSE corporate governance standards. All of these members are independent directors. The audit committee is responsible for approving our independent accountants, reviewing with our independent accountants the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by our independent accountants, reviewing the independence of our independent accountants and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. The audit committee is also responsible for aiding our board of directors in determining the fair value of debt and equity investments that are not publicly traded or for which current market values are not readily available; where appropriate, the board of directors and audit committee may utilize the services of an independent valuation firm to assist them in determining the fair value of these investments. Finally, the audit committee also reviews our financial statements and the disclosure thereof and the adequacy of our disclosure controls and procedures.
Authority
The audit committee is authorized (without seeking Board approval) to retain special legal, accounting or other advisors and may request any officer or employee of the Company or the Companys outside counsel or independent auditor to meet with any members of, or advisors to, the audit committee. The audit committee has available appropriate funding from the Company as determined by the audit committee for payment of: (i) compensation to any accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company, (ii) compensation to any advisers employed by the audit committee, and (iii) ordinary administrative expenses of the audit committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties. The audit committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees or the chairman of the audit committee when it deems appropriate and in the best interests of the Company.
Procedures
The audit committee meets as often as it determines is appropriate to carry out its responsibilities under its charter, but not less frequently than quarterly. The chairman of the audit committee, in consultation with the other committee members, determines the frequency and length of the committee meetings and sets meeting agendas consistent with its charter. The audit committee meets separately, periodically, with management, with internal auditors or other personnel responsible for the internal audit function and with the independent auditor. The audit committee met nine times during fiscal year 2016.
A charter of the audit committee is available in print to any stockholder who requests it and it is also available on the Companys website at www.saratogainvestmentcorp.com.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The current members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are Charles S. Whitman III (Chairman), G. Cabell Williams and Steven M. Looney. All of these members are independent directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become board members, and recommending to the Board director nominees for election at the next annual or special meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected or to fill any vacancies or newly created directorships that may occur between such meetings, recommending directors for appointment to Board committees, making recommendations to the Board as to determinations of director independence, overseeing the evaluation of the Board, overseeing and setting compensation for the Companys directors.
119
In making its recommendations for Board and committee membership, the nominating and corporate governance committee reviews candidates qualifications for membership on the Board or a committee of the Board (including making a specific determination as to the independence of each candidate) based on the criteria approved by the Board (and taking into account the enhanced independence, financial literacy and financial expertise standards required under law or the New York Stock Exchange rules for audit committee membership purposes). In evaluating current directors for re-nomination to the Board or re-appointment to any Board committees, the nominating and corporate governance committee assesses the performance of such directors, periodically reviews the composition of the Board and its committees in light of the current challenges and needs of the Board, the Company and each committee, and determines whether it may be appropriate to add or remove individuals after considering issues of judgment, diversity, age, skills, background and experience, considers rotation of committee members and committee chairmen and considers any other factors that are set forth in the Companys corporate governance procedures or are deemed appropriate by the nominating and corporate governance committee or the Board. The nominating and corporate governance committee considers issues of judgment, diversity, age, skills, background and experience in evaluating candidates for membership on the Board.
The nominating and corporate governance committee does not have a formal policy on the consideration of director candidates recommended by stockholders. The board of directors believes that it is more appropriate to give the nominating and corporate governance committee flexibility in evaluating stockholder recommendations. In the event that a director nominee is recommended by a stockholder, the nominating and corporate governance committee will give due consideration to the director nominee and will use the same criteria used for evaluating board director nominees, in addition to considering the information relating to the director nominee provided by the stockholder.
Authority
The nominating and corporate governance committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm assisting the nominating and corporate governance committee in identifying director candidates, including sole authority to approve all such search firms fees and other retention terms. In addition, the nominating and corporate governance committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant assisting the nominating and corporate governance committee in the evaluation of director compensation, including sole authority to approve all such compensation consultants fees and other retention terms. The nominating and corporate governance committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees or the chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee when it deems appropriate and in the best interests of the Company.
Procedures
The nominating and corporate governance committee meets as often as it determines is appropriate to carry out its responsibilities under its charter. The chair of the committee, in consultation with the other committee members, determines the frequency and length of the committee meetings and shall set meeting agendas consistent with its charter. The nominating and corporate governance committee met once during fiscal year 2016.
A charter of the nominating and corporate governance committee is available in print to any stockholder who requests it, and it is also available on the Companys website at www.saratogainvestmentcorp.com.
Compensation Committee
The current members of the compensation committee are G. Cabell Williams (Chairman), Steven M. Looney and Charles S. Whitman III. All of these members are independent directors. The compensation committee is responsible for overseeing the Companys compensation policies generally and making recommendations to the Board with respect to incentive compensation and equity-based plans of the Company that are subject to Board approval, evaluating executive officer performance and reviewing the Companys
120
management succession plan, overseeing and setting compensation for the Companys directors and, as applicable, its executive officers and, as applicable, preparing the report on executive officer compensation that SEC rules require to be included in the Companys annual proxy statement. Currently, none of our executive officers are compensated by the Company and as such the compensation committee is not required to produce a report on executive officer compensation for inclusion in our annual proxy statement.
The compensation committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant assisting the compensation committee, including sole authority to approve all such compensation consultants fees and other retention terms. The compensation committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees or the chairman of the compensation committee when it deems appropriate and in the best interests of the Company.
Procedures
The compensation committee shall meet as often as it determines is appropriate to carry out its responsibilities under its charter. The chairman of the compensation committee, in consultation with the other committee members, shall determine the frequency and length of the committee meetings and shall set meeting agendas consistent with its charter. No executive officer should attend that portion of any meeting where such executives performance (or, as applicable, compensation) is discussed, unless specifically invited by the compensation committee. The compensation committee met once during fiscal year 2016.
A charter of the compensation committee is available in print to any stockholder who requests it and is also available on the Companys website at www.saratogainvestmentcorp.com.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During fiscal year 2016, none of the Companys executive officers served on the board of directors (or a compensation committee thereof or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entities that had one or more executive officers serve on the compensation committee or on the board of directors. No current or past executive officers or employees of the Company or its affiliates serve on the compensation committee.
Executive Compensation
Currently, none of our executive officers are compensated by us. We currently have no employees, and each of our executive officers is also an employee of Saratoga Investment Advisors. Services necessary for our business are provided by individuals who are employees of Saratoga Investment Advisors, pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement and the administration agreement.
Director Compensation
Our independent directors receive an annual fee of $40,000. They also receive $2,500 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting and receive $1,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each committee meeting. In addition, the chairman of the audit committee receives an annual fee of $5,000 and the chairman of each other committee receives an annual fee of $2,000 for their additional services in these capacities. In addition, we have purchased directors and officers liability insurance on behalf of our directors and officers. Independent directors have the option to receive their directors fees in the form of our common stock issued at a price per share equal to the greater of net asset value or the market price at the time of payment. No compensation is paid to directors who are interested persons.
121
The following table sets forth information concerning total compensation earned by or paid to each of our directors during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2016:
Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash |
Total | ||||||
Interested Directors |
||||||||
Christian L. Oberbeck(1) |
| | ||||||
Michael J. Grisius(1) |
| | ||||||
Independent Directors |
| | ||||||
Steven M. Looney |
$ | 71,000 | $ | 71,000 | ||||
Charles S. Whitman III |
$ | 68,000 | $ | 68,000 | ||||
G. Cabell Williams |
$ | 68,000 | $ | 68,000 |
(1) | No compensation was paid to directors who are interested persons of us as defined in the 1940 Act. |
122
The day-to-day management of our portfolio is the responsibility of Saratoga Investment Advisors and overseen by its investment committee.
Investment Committee
The members of Saratoga Investment Advisors investment committee include Christian L. Oberbeck, Michael J. Grisius, Thomas V. Inglesby and Charles G. Phillips. See the section of the prospectus entitled Management for biographies of Messrs. Oberbeck and Grisius. For biographical information for Messrs. Inglesby and Phillips, see Investment Professionals below.
Investment Professionals
Our investment advisers investment personnel, in addition to our investment advisers investment committee, are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of our portfolio.
The members of our investment advisers investment committee and its investment personnel are not be employed by us, and receive no compensation from us in connection with their activities. However, they receive compensation from our investment adviser that includes an annual base salary, an annual individual performance bonus, contributions to 401(k) plans, and, in certain circumstances, a portion of the incentive fee or carried interest earned in connection with their services.
Below are the biographies for the members of our investment advisers investment committee whose biographies are not included elsewhere in this prospectus and the other investment professionals of our investment adviser.
Thomas V. InglesbyMr. Inglesby has over 25 years of investment experience including private equity and leveraged finance. Mr. Inglesby is a managing director at Saratoga Investment Advisors and is responsible for originating, structuring, negotiating, consummating, managing and monitoring middle market investments.
Prior to joining Saratoga Investment Advisors, Mr. Inglesby was a senior managing director at GSC Group, Inc. From September 2008 through July 2010, Mr. Inglesby was a senior managing director in the Recovery Investment Group at GSC Group, serving on the investment committee as an internal advisor on matters relating to GSC Groups ongoing restructuring. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Inglesby served as the Head of the U.S. Corporate Debt Group of GSC Group. During this period, GSC Group raised and managed $5.6 billion in capital across 12 corporate credit investment funds. From 1997 to 2002, he served as a managing director at GSC Group focused on middle market buyouts. Prior to joining GSC Group in 1997, Mr. Inglesby served as a managing director with Harbour Group from 1994 to 1997, where he focused on acquisitions of manufacturing companies in fragmented industries. From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Inglesby served as a managing director at the South Street Funds, a startup distressed debt investment fund founded by former partners at Goldman Sachs. From 1986 to 1990, Mr. Inglesby served as a vice president in the Merchant Banking Department at PaineWebber.
In September 2010, GSC Group filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
Mr. Inglesby received a J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law, an M.B.A. from the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, and a B.S. in Accounting with General Honors from the University of Maryland.
Charles G. Phillips IVMr. Phillips has over 13 years of investment experience including private equity and leveraged finance. Mr. Phillips is a managing director at Saratoga Investment Advisors and Saratoga Partners
123
and has been involved in originating, structuring, negotiating, consummating, managing and monitoring middle market investments. Mr. Phillips has extensive experience investing in middle-market manufacturing and service companies. He also has extensive experience in dealing with public financings and sales through his work with several portfolio companies of Saratoga Partners. Prior corporate finance experience includes mergers and acquisitions and capital markets experience in a variety of industries, including packaged foods, consumer products, cable television, energy and education. Mr. Phillips joined Saratoga Partners in 1997 after graduating from Harvard Business School. Prior to that, from 1993 to 1995, Mr. Phillips worked in Dillon Reads corporate finance department, where he was involved in mergers and acquisitions and advisory assignments in a variety of industries. Prior experience includes McCown De Leeuw & Co., a corporate buyout firm. Mr. Phillips has served as a director of a number of Saratoga Partners portfolio companies.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with Related Persons
We have entered into a Management Agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC. We have also entered into a license agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, pursuant to which Saratoga Investment Advisors has agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name Saratoga. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the administration agreement, Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC provides us with the office facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations. Mr. Oberbeck, our chief executive officer, is the primary investor in and controls Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
The Audit Committee of our Board is required to review and approve any transactions with related persons (as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K).
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth, as of March 9, 2017, the beneficial ownership of each current director, the nominees for director, the Companys executive officers, each person known to us to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and the executive officers and directors as a group.
The percentage ownership is based on 5,794,600 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 9, 2017. Shares of common stock that are subject to warrants or other convertible securities currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days thereof, are deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding these options or convertible securities, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. To our knowledge, unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned. Unless otherwise indicated by footnote, the address for each listed individual is Saratoga Investment Corp., 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022.
124
Name of Beneficial Owners |
Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
Percent of Class |
||||||
Interested Directors |
||||||||
Christian L. Oberbeck |
1,712,599 | (1) | 29.6 | % | ||||
Michael J. Grisius |
143,709 | 2.5 | % | |||||
Executive Officer |
||||||||
Henri J. Steenkamp |
5,641 | * | ||||||
Independent Directors |
||||||||
Steven M. Looney |
2,508 | * | ||||||
Charles S. Whitman III |
2,347 | * | ||||||
G. Cabell Williams |
39,363 | * | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group |
1,906,167 | 32.9 | % | |||||
Owners of 5% or more of our common stock |
||||||||
Black Diamond Capital Management, L.L.C.(2) |
642,922 | 11.1 | % | |||||
Elizabeth Oberbeck(3) |
744,183 | 12.8 | % | |||||
Thomas V. Inglesby(4) |
342,937 | 5.9 | % |
* | Less than 1% |
Mr. Oberbeck and Mr. Inglesby are affiliates who make up 35.6% of the ownership of SAR.
(1) | Includes 550,263 shares of common stock directly held by Mr. Oberbeck, 197,759 shares of common stock held by Saratoga Investment Advisors, which Mr. Oberbeck controls, and 220,394 shares of common stock held by CLO Partners LLC, an entity wholly owned by Mr. Oberbeck and 744,183 shares of common stock directly held by Elizabeth Oberbeck. See footnote 3 below. |
(2) | Based on information included in Amendment No. 6 to Schedule 13G filed by Black Diamond Capital Management, L.L.C. with the SEC on February 13, 2017. The address of Black Diamond Capital Management, L.L.C. is One Sound Shore Drive, Suite 200, Greenwich, CT 06830. |
(3) | Based on information included in Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13D filed jointly by Christian L. Oberbeck, Elizabeth Oberbeck, Saratoga Investment Advisors and CLO Partners LLC on November 4, 2014. Pursuant to an Agreement Relating to Shares of Common Stock of Saratoga Investment Corp. (the Transfer Agreement), Christian L. Oberbeck transferred 744,183 shares of common stock beneficially owned by him to Elizabeth Oberbeck. Elizabeth Oberbeck has full ownership rights with respect to the shares, including without limitation, the right to (A) receive any cash and/or stock dividends and distributions paid on or with respect to the shares and (B) sell the shares in accordance with the provisions of the Transfer Agreement and receive all proceeds therefrom. However, pursuant to the terms of the Transfer Agreement, Christian L. Oberbeck has retained the right to vote the shares, except that Elizabeth Oberbeck has retained the right to vote the shares on all matters submitted to shareholders with respect to any matter that could give rise to dissenters or other rights of an objecting shareholder under Maryland General Corporation Law. The Transfer Agreement also contains a right of first refusal that requires Elizabeth Oberbeck to offer Christian L. Oberbeck the opportunity to purchase any shares of Common Stock owned by her prior to her intended sale of the shares. Any such purchases may be made either directly by Mr. Oberbeck or through entities affiliated with him. |
(4) | Based on information included in Schedule 13D filing Thomas V. Inglesby with the SEC on January 6, 2014. |
125
Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each of our directors as of March 9, 2017. We are not part of a family of investment companies as that term is defined in the 1940 Act.
Name of Director |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities Beneficially Owned(1)(2) |
|||
Interested Directors |
||||
Christian L. Oberbeck |
Over $1,000,000 | |||
Michael J. Grisius |
Over $1,000,000 | |||
Independent Directors |
||||
Steven M. Looney |
$50,001-$100,000 | |||
Charles S. Whitman |
$50,001-$100,000 | |||
G. Cabell Williams |
$500,001-$1,000,000 |
(1) | The dollar ranges are as follows: None, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000, $100,001-$500,000, $500,001-$1,000,000 or over $1,000,000. |
(2) | The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned in us is based on the closing price for our common stock of $23.27 on March 9, 2017 on the New York Stock Exchange. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) of the Exchange Act. |
126
Business Development Company Regulations
We have elected to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. As with other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, a BDC must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between BDCs and their affiliates (including any investment advisers or sub-advisers), principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters, and requires that a majority of the directors be persons other than interested persons, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a BDC, unless approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities. A majority of the outstanding voting securities of a company is defined under the 1940 Act as the lesser of: (i) 67% or more of such companys stock present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding stock of such company is present and represented by proxy or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding stock of such company.
Qualifying Assets
Under the 1940 Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the companys total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are the following:
(1) | Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which: |
(a) is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;
(b) is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the BDC) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
(c) satisfies either of the following:
(i) does not have any class of securities listed on a national securities exchange;
(ii) has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million;
(iii) is controlled by a BDC or a group of companies including a BDC and the BDC has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible portfolio company;
(iv) is a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2 million; or
(v) meets such other criteria as may established by the SEC.
(2) | Securities of any eligible portfolio company which we control. |
(3) | Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements. |
(4) | Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own at least 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company. |
127
(5) | Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of options, warrants or rights relating to such securities. |
(6) | Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. Government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment. |
Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies
As a BDC we offer, and must provide upon request, managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. This assistance could involve, among other things, monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies, participating in board and management meetings, consulting with and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and financial guidance. Pursuant to a separate administration agreement, our investment adviser provides such managerial assistance on our behalf to portfolio companies that request this assistance, recognizing that our involvement with each investment will vary based on factors including the size of the company, the nature of our investment, the companys overall stage of development and our relative position in the capital structure. We may receive fees for these services.
In addition, a BDC must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2) or (3) above under Qualifying assets. BDCs generally must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities significant managerial assistance, except in circumstances where either (i) the BDC controls such issuer of securities or (ii) the BDC purchases such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together and one of the other persons in the group makes available such managerial assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the BDC, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.
Temporary investments
As a BDC, pending investment in other types of qualifying assets, as described above, our investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. Government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets. Typically, we will invest in U.S. Treasury Bills or in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. Government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements. However, if more than 25% of our total assets constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, we would not meet the asset diversification requirements in order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, we do not intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in excess of this limit. Our investment adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.
Indebtedness and senior securities
As a BDC, we are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of shares of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while any indebtedness and senior securities
128
remain outstanding, we must generally make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or stock unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes without regard to asset coverage.
Common stock
We are generally not able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock if our board of directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and that of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount). We may also make rights offerings to our stockholders at prices per share less than the net asset value per share, subject to applicable requirements of the 1940 Act.
Code of ethics
As a BDC, we and Saratoga Investment Advisors have each adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain personal securities transactions. Personnel subject to each code may invest in securities for their personal investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such investments are made in accordance with the codes requirements.
Proxy voting policies and procedures
SEC registered investment advisers that have the authority to vote (client) proxies (which authority may be implied from a general grant of investment discretion) are required to adopt policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the adviser votes proxies in the best interests of its clients. Registered investment advisers also must maintain certain records on proxy voting. In most cases, we will invest in securities that do not generally entitle us to voting rights in our portfolio companies. When we do have voting rights, we will delegate the exercise of such rights to our investment adviser.
Saratoga Investment Advisors has particular proxy voting policies and procedures in place. In determining how to vote, officers of Saratoga Investment Advisors will consult with each other, taking into account our interests and the interests of our investors, as well as any potential conflicts of interest. Saratoga Investment Advisors will consult with legal counsel to identify potential conflicts of interest. Where a potential conflict of interest exists, Saratoga Investment Advisors may, if it so elects, resolve it by following the recommendation of a disinterested third party, by seeking the direction of our independent directors or, in extreme cases, by abstaining from voting. While Saratoga Investment Advisors may retain an outside service to provide voting recommendations and to assist in analyzing votes, it will not delegate its voting authority to any third party.
An officer of Saratoga Investment Advisors will keep a written record of how all such proxies are voted. It will retain records of (1) proxy voting policies and procedures, (2) all proxy statements received (or it may rely on proxy statements filed on the SECs EDGAR system in lieu thereof), (3) all votes cast, (4) investor requests for voting information, and (5) any specific documents prepared or received in connection with a decision on a proxy vote. If it uses an outside service, Saratoga Investment Advisors may rely on such service to maintain copies of proxy statements and records, so long as such service will provide a copy of such documents promptly upon request.
Saratoga Investment Advisors proxy voting policies are not exhaustive and are designed to be responsive to the wide range of issues that may be subject to a proxy vote. In general, Saratoga Investment Advisors will vote
129
our proxies in accordance with these guidelines unless: (1) it has determined otherwise due to the specific and unusual facts and circumstances with respect to a particular vote, (2) the subject matter of the vote is not covered by these guidelines, (3) a material conflict of interest is present, or (4) it finds it necessary to vote contrary to its general guidelines to maximize stockholder value or our best interests.
In reviewing proxy issues, Saratoga Investment Advisors generally will use the following guidelines:
Elections of Directors: In general, Saratoga Investment Advisors will vote in favor of the management-proposed slate of directors. If there is a proxy fight for seats on a portfolio companys board of directors, or Saratoga Investment Advisors determines that there are other compelling reasons for withholding our vote, it will determine the appropriate vote on the matter. It may withhold votes for directors that fail to act on key issues, such as failure to: (1) implement proposals to declassify a board, (2) implement a majority vote requirement, (3) submit a rights plan to a stockholder vote or (4) act on tender offers where a majority of stockholders have tendered their shares. Finally, Saratoga Investment Advisors may withhold votes for directors of non-U.S. issuers where there is insufficient information about the nominees disclosed in the proxy statement.
Appointment of Auditors: We believe that a portfolio company remains in the best position to choose its independent auditors and Saratoga Investment Advisors will generally support managements recommendation in this regard.
Changes in Capital Structure: Changes in a portfolio companys organizational documents may be required by state or federal regulation. In general, Saratoga Investment Advisors will cast our votes in accordance with the management on such proposals. However, Saratoga Investment Advisors will consider carefully any proposal regarding a change in corporate structure that is not required by state or federal regulation.
Corporate Restructurings, Mergers and Acquisitions: We believe proxy votes dealing with corporate reorganizations are an extension of the investment decision. Accordingly, Saratoga Investment Advisors will analyze such proposals on a case-by-case basis and vote in accordance with its perception of our interests.
Proposals Affecting Stockholder Rights: We will generally vote in favor of proposals that give stockholders a greater voice in the affairs of a portfolio company and oppose any measure that seeks to limit such rights. However, when analyzing such proposals, Saratoga Investment Advisors will balance the financial impact of the proposal against any impairment of stockholder rights as well as of our investment in the portfolio company.
Corporate Governance: We recognize the importance of good corporate governance. Accordingly, Saratoga Investment Advisors will generally favor proposals that promote transparency and accountability within a portfolio company.
Anti-Takeover Measures: Saratoga Investment Advisors will evaluate, on a case-by-case basis, any proposals regarding anti-takeover measures to determine the likely effect on stockholder value dilution.
Share Splits: Saratoga Investment Advisors will generally vote with management on share split matters.
Limited Liability of Directors: Saratoga Investment Advisors will generally vote with management on matters that could adversely affect the limited liability of directors.
Social and Corporate Responsibility: Saratoga Investment Advisors will review proposals related to social, political and environmental issues to determine whether they may adversely affect stockholder value. It may abstain from voting on such proposals where they do not have a readily determinable financial impact on stockholder value.
130
Privacy principles
We are committed to protecting the privacy of our stockholders. The following explains the privacy policies of Saratoga Investment Corp., Saratoga Investment Advisors and their affiliated companies.
We will safeguard, according to strict standards of security and confidentiality, all information we receive about our stockholders. The only information we collect from stockholders is the holders name, address, number of shares and social security number. This information is used only so that we can send annual reports and other information about us to the stockholder, and send the stockholder proxy statements or other information required by law.
We do not share this information with any non-affiliated third party except as described below.
| Authorized Employees of Saratoga Investment Advisors. It is our policy that only authorized employees of Saratoga Investment Advisors who need to know a stockholders personal information will have access to it. |
| Service Providers. We may disclose your personal information to companies that provide services on our behalf, such as recordkeeping, processing a stockholders trades, and mailing a stockholder information. These companies are required to protect our stockholders information and use it solely for the purpose for which they received it. |
| Courts and Government Officials. If required by law, we may disclose a stockholders personal information in accordance with a court order or at the request of government regulators. Only that information required by law, subpoena, or court order will be disclosed. |
Compliance with applicable laws
As a BDC, we will be subject to periodic examination by the SEC for compliance with the 1940 Act.
We are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect us against larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a BDC, we are prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to us or our stockholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such persons office.
We and Saratoga Investment Advisors are each required to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws, review these policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation, and designate a chief compliance officer to be responsible for administering the policies and procedures.
Co-investment
We may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our board of directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC. Thus, based on current SEC interpretations, co-investment transactions involving a BDC like us and an entity that is advised by Saratoga Investment Advisors or an affiliated adviser generally could not be effected without SEC relief. The staff of the SEC has, however, granted no-action relief to third parties permitting for purchases of a single class of privately-placed securities provided that the adviser negotiates no term other than price and certain other conditions are met. As a result, currently we only expect to co-invest on a concurrent basis with affiliates of Saratoga Investment Advisors when each of us will own the same securities of the issuer and when no term is negotiated other than price. Any such investment would be made, subject to compliance with existing regulatory guidance, applicable regulations and our allocation procedures.
We may in the future submit an exemptive application to the SEC to permit greater flexibility to negotiate the terms of co-investments because we believe that it will be advantageous for us to co-invest with affiliates of
131
Saratoga Investment Advisors where such investment is consistent with the investment objective, investment positions, investment policies, investment strategies, investment restrictions, regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors applicable to us. However, there is no assurance that any application for exemptive relief, if made, would be granted by the SEC.
Small Business Investment Company Regulations
On March 28, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC, LP, received an SBIC license from the SBA.
The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the satisfaction of certain customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed at the time of issuance at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities.
SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses. Under present SBA regulations, eligible small businesses include businesses that have a tangible net worth not exceeding $18 million and have average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $6 million for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, an SBIC must devote 25% of its investment activity to smaller concerns as defined by the SBA. A smaller concern is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6 million and has average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $2 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the number of employees and gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans to small businesses, invest in the equity securities of such businesses and provide them with consulting and advisory services.
SBA regulations currently limit the amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures that an SBIC may issue to $150 million when it has at least $75 million in regulatory capital. Affiliated SBICs are permitted to issue up to a combined maximum amount of $225 million in SBA-guaranteed debentures when they have at least $112.5 million in combined regulatory capital. As of June 4, 2014, our SBIC subsidiary had $32 million in regulatory capital and $64 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their capital stock. SBA regulations also include restrictions on a change of control or transfer of an SBIC and require that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations. In addition, our SBIC subsidiary may also be limited in its ability to make distributions to us if it does not have sufficient capital, in accordance with SBA regulations.
Our SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that our SBIC subsidiary will receive SBA guaranteed debenture funding, which is dependent upon our SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies. The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to our SBIC subsidiarys assets over our stockholders in the event we liquidate our SBIC subsidiary or the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by our SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default.
132
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is a general summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to us and to an investment in shares of our common stock which is based on the provisions of the Code and the Treasury regulations in effect as they directly govern our U.S. federal income tax treatment and the U.S. federal income taxation of our stockholders. These provisions are subject to differing interpretations and change by legislative or administrative action, and any change may be retroactive. The discussion does not purport to deal with all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to us, or which may be important to particular stockholders in light of their individual investment circumstances or to some types of stockholders subject to special tax rules, such as financial institutions, broker-dealers, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, partnerships or other pass-through entities, persons holding our common shares in connection with a hedging, straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction, persons engaged in a trade or business in the United States or persons who have ceased to be U.S. citizens or to be taxed as resident aliens. This discussion assumes that the stockholders hold their common shares as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, assets held for investment). No attempt is made to present a detailed explanation of all U.S. federal income tax aspects affecting us and our stockholders, and the discussion set forth herein does not constitute tax advice. This summary also does not discuss any aspects of U.S. estate or gift tax or foreign, state or local tax. It does not discuss the special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws that could result if we invested in tax-exempt securities or certain other investment assets. No ruling has been or will be sought from the Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, regarding any matter discussed herein. Tax counsel has not rendered any legal opinion regarding any tax consequences relating to us or our stockholders. Stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors to determine the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences to them of investing in our shares.
This summary does not discuss the consequences of an investment in shares of our preferred stock, debt securities or warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock, debt or securities. The tax consequences of such an investment will be discussed in a relevant prospectus supplement.
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. stockholder (or in this section, a stockholder) is a holder or a beneficial holder of shares which is for U.S. federal income tax purposes (1) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S., (2) a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (3) an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source, or (4) a trust if (a) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the trusts administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (b) the trust has in effect a valid election to be treated as a domestic trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If a partnership or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds the shares, the tax treatment of the partnership and each partner generally will depend on the activities of the partnership and the activities of the partner. Partnerships acquiring shares, and partners in such partnerships, should consult their own tax advisors. Prospective investors that are not U.S. stockholders should refer to Non-U.S. Stockholders below.
Tax matters are complicated and prospective investors in our shares are urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal income tax and state, local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in our shares, including the potential application of U.S. withholding taxes.
Taxation of the Company
Election to Be Taxed as a RIC
As a BDC, we elected and qualified to be treated as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we timely distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In addition,
133
we must timely distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, which is generally our net ordinary income plus the excess of realized net short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses (the Annual Distribution Requirement). Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations governing SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to enable us to maintain our status as a RIC. We may have to request a waiver of the SBAs restrictions for our SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such a waiver.
Taxation as a RIC
As a RIC, if we satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, we will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the portion of our investment company taxable income and net capital gain, defined as net long-term capital gains in excess of net short-term capital losses, we distribute to stockholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates on any net income or net capital gain not distributed to our stockholders.
We will be subject to a nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax of 4% on undistributed income if it does not distribute at least 98% of its net ordinary income for any calendar year and 98.2% of its capital gain net income for each one-year period ending on October 31 of such calender year and any income realized, but not distributed, in preceding years and on which we did not pay federal income tax. Depending on the level of investment company taxable income (ICTI) earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to carry forward ICTI in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next tax year. Any such carryover ICTI must be distributed before the end of that next tax year through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which generated such ICTI. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions for excise tax purposes, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned.
In order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:
| qualify to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year; |
| derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities, and net income derived from interests in qualified publicly traded partnerships (partnerships that are traded on an established securities market or tradable on a secondary market, other than partnerships that derive 90% of their income from interest, dividends and other permitted RIC income) (the 90% Income Test); and |
| diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year: |
| at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and |
| no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of one issuer or of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or in the securities of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships (the Diversification Tests). |
We may invest in partnerships, including qualified publicly traded partnerships, which may result in our being subject to state, local or foreign income and franchise or withholding liabilities.
134
Any underwriting fees paid by us are not deductible. We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with PIK interest or, in certain cases, with increasing interest rates or issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. Because any original issue discount accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our stockholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received any corresponding cash amount.
Although we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, we are not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding unless certain asset coverage tests are met. See Regulation Senior Securities. Moreover, our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of our portfolio and/or (2) other requirements relating to our qualification as a RIC, including the Diversification Tests. If we dispose of assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or the excise tax requirement, we may make such dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.
Some of the income and fees that we may recognize will not satisfy the 90% Income Test. In order to ensure that such income and fees do not disqualify us as a RIC for a failure to satisfy the 90% Income Test, we may be required to recognize such income and fees indirectly through one or more entities treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such corporations will be required to pay U.S. corporate income tax on their earnings, which ultimately will reduce our return on such income and fees.
Failure to Qualify as a RIC
If we were unable to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC, we would be subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We would not be able to deduct distributions to stockholders, nor would they be required to be made. Distributions, including distributions of net long-term capital gain, would generally be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary dividend income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the dividends received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholders tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for a period greater than two taxable years, to qualify as a RIC in a subsequent year we may be subject to regular corporate tax on any net built-in gains with respect to certain of our assets ( i.e., the excess of the aggregate gains, including items of income, over aggregate losses that would have been realized with respect to such assets if we had been liquidated) that we elect to recognize on requalification or when recognized over the next ten years.
Company Investments
Certain of our investment practices are subject to special and complex U.S. federal income tax provisions that may, among other things, (1) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of certain losses or deductions, including the dividends received deduction, (2) convert lower taxed long-term capital gains and qualified dividend income into higher taxed short-term capital gains or ordinary income, (3) convert ordinary loss or a deduction into capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited), (4) cause us to recognize income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash, (5) adversely affect the time as to when a purchase or sale of stock or securities is deemed to occur, (6) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial transactions and (7) produce income that will not qualify as good income for purposes of the 90% annual gross income requirement described above. We will monitor our transactions and may make certain tax elections and may be required to borrow money or dispose of securities to mitigate the effect of these rules and prevent disqualification as a RIC.
135
Investments we make in securities issued at a discount or providing for deferred interest or payment of interest in kind are subject to special tax rules that will affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to stockholders. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with PIK interest or, in certain cases, with increasing interest rates or issued with warrants), we will generally be required to accrue daily as income a portion of the discount and to distribute such income each year to avoid U.S. federal income and excise taxes. Since in certain circumstances we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty making distributions in the amounts necessary to satisfy the requirements for maintaining RIC status and for avoiding U.S. federal income and excise taxes. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investment originations to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify as a RIC and thereby be subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax.
Gain or loss realized by us from warrants acquired by us as well as any loss attributable to the lapse of such warrants generally will be treated as capital gain or loss. Such gain or loss generally will be long term or short term, depending on how long we held a particular warrant.
In the event we invest in foreign securities, we may be subject to withholding and other foreign taxes with respect to those securities. In that case, our yield on those securities would be decreased. We do not expect to satisfy the requirements necessary to pass through to our stockholders their share of the foreign taxes paid by us.
If we purchase shares in a passive foreign investment company (a PFIC), we may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a portion of any excess distribution or gain from the disposition of such shares even if such income is distributed as a taxable dividend by us to our stockholders. Additional charges in the nature of interest may be imposed on us in respect of deferred taxes arising from such distributions or gains. If we invest in a PFIC and elect to treat the PFIC as a qualified electing fund under the Code (a QEF), in lieu of the foregoing requirements, we will be required to include in income each year a portion of the ordinary earnings and net capital gain of the QEF, even if such income is not distributed to us. Alternatively, we can elect to mark-to-market at the end of each taxable year our shares in a PFIC; in this case, we will recognize as ordinary income any increase in the value of such shares, and as ordinary loss any decrease in such value to the extent it does not exceed prior increases included in income. Under either election, we may be required to recognize in a year income in excess of our distributions from PFICs and our proceeds from dispositions of PFIC stock during that year, and such income will nevertheless be subject to the Annual Distribution Requirement and will be taken into account for purposes of the 4% excise tax. In addition, under recently proposed regulations, income required to be included as a result of a QEF election would not be qualifying income for purposes of 90% Income Test unless we receive a distribution of such income from the PFIC in the same taxable year to which the inclusion relates. See Taxation of the Company above.
The remainder of this discussion assumes that we qualify as a RIC and have satisfied the Annual Distribution Requirement.
Taxation of U.S. Stockholders
Distributions we pay to you from our net ordinary income or from an excess of realized net short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses (together referred to hereinafter as ordinary income dividends) are generally taxable to you as ordinary income to the extent of our earnings and profits. Due to our expected investments, in general, distributions will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporate stockholders and will not qualify for the reduced rates of tax for qualified dividend income allowed to individuals. Distributions made to you from an excess of realized net long-term capital gains over realized net short-term capital losses (capital gain dividends), including capital gain dividends credited to you but retained by us, are taxable to you as long-term capital gains if they have been properly designated by us, regardless of the length of time you have owned our shares. Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will first reduce the
136
adjusted tax basis of your shares and, after the adjusted tax basis is reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to you (assuming the shares are held as a capital asset). The current maximum U.S. federal tax rate on long-term capital gains of individuals is generally 20 percent. For non-corporate taxpayers, ordinary income dividends will currently be taxed at a maximum rate of 39.6 percent, while capital gain dividends generally will be currently taxed at a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 20 percent. For corporate taxpayers, both ordinary income dividends and capital gain dividends are currently taxed at a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 35 percent. In addition, individuals with income in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 in the case of married individuals filing jointly) and certain estates and trusts are subject to an additional 3.8% tax on their net investment income, which generally includes net income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, and rents, and net capital gains (other than certain amounts earned from trades or businesses). Present law also taxes both long-term and short-term capital gains of corporations at the rates applicable to ordinary income. Non-corporate stockholders with net capital losses for a year (i.e., net capital losses in excess of net capital gains) generally may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses against their ordinary income each year; any net capital losses of a non-corporate stockholder in excess of $3,000 generally may be carried forward and used in subsequent years, subject to certain limitations, as provided in the Code. Corporate stockholders generally may not deduct any net capital losses for a year, but may carryback such losses for three years or carry forward such losses for five years.
In the event that we retain any net capital gains, we may designate the retained amounts as undistributed capital gains in a notice to our stockholders. If a designation is made, stockholders would include in income, as long-term capital gains, their proportionate share of the undistributed amounts, but would be allowed a credit or refund, as the case may be, for their proportionate share of the corporate tax paid by us. In addition, the tax basis of shares owned by a stockholder would be increased by an amount equal to the difference between (i) the amount included in the stockholders income as long-term capital gains and (ii) the stockholders proportionate share of the corporate tax paid by us.
We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in cash or shares of our common stock at the election of each stockholder. Under certain applicable provisions of the Code and the Treasury regulations, distributions payable in cash or in shares of stock at the election of stockholders are treated as taxable dividends. The Internal Revenue Service has issued private rulings indicating that this rule will apply even where the total amount of cash that may be distributed is limited to no more than 20% of the total distribution. Under these rulings, if too many stockholders elect to receive their distributions in cash, each such stockholder would receive a pro rata share of the total cash to be distributed and would receive the remainder of their distribution in shares of stock. If we decide to make any distributions consistent with these rulings that are payable in part in our stock, taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend (whether received in cash, our stock, or a combination thereof) as ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale. In addition, if a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of our stock.
If an investor purchases shares of our common stock shortly before the record date of a distribution, the price of the shares will include the value of the distribution and the investor will be subject to tax on the distribution even though economically it may represent a return of his, her or its investment.
We (or the applicable withholding agent) will send to each of our U.S. stockholders after the end of each calendar year, a notice reporting the amounts includible in such U.S. stockholders taxable income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital gain. In addition, the federal tax status of each years distributions generally will be reported to the IRS (including the amount of dividends, if any, eligible for the 20% maximum rate). Dividends paid by us generally will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction or the preferential
137
tax rate applicable to Qualifying Dividends because our income generally will not consist of dividends. Distributions may also be subject to additional state, local and foreign taxes depending on a U.S. stockholders particular situation.
As a RIC, we will be subject to alternative minimum tax, also referred to as AMT, but any items that are treated differently for AMT purposes must be apportioned between us and our U.S. stockholders and this may affect the U.S. stockholders AMT liabilities. Although regulations explaining the precise method of apportionment have not yet been issued, such items will generally be apportioned in the same proportion that dividends paid to each U.S. stockholder bear to our taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction), unless a different method for particular item is warranted under the circumstances.
Dividends and other taxable distributions are taxable to you even though they are reinvested in additional shares of our common stock. If we pay you a dividend in January which was declared in the previous October, November or December to stockholders of record on a specified date in one of these months, then the dividend will be treated for tax purposes as being paid by us and received by you on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
A stockholder will generally recognize gain or loss on the sale or exchange of our common shares in an amount equal to the difference between the stockholders adjusted basis in the shares sold or exchanged and the amount realized on their disposition. Generally, gain recognized by a stockholder on the sale or other disposition of our common shares will result in capital gain or loss to you, and will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for more than one year at the time of sale. Any loss upon the sale or exchange of our shares held for six months or less will be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of any capital gain dividends received (including amounts credited as an undistributed capital gain dividend) by you. A loss realized on a sale or exchange of our shares will be disallowed if other substantially identical shares are acquired (whether through the automatic reinvestment of dividends or otherwise) within a 61-day period beginning 30 days before and ending 30 days after the date that the shares are disposed of. In this case, the basis of the shares acquired will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss.
Stockholders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state, local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in our shares.
Backup Withholding. We are required in certain circumstances to backup withhold on taxable dividends or distributions and certain other payments paid to non-corporate stockholders who do not furnish us with their correct taxpayer identification number (in the case of individuals, their social security number) and certain certifications, or who are otherwise subject to backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld from payments made to you may be refunded or credited against your U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.
Reportable Transactions Reporting. If a U.S. stockholder recognizes a loss with respect to shares of our common stock of $2 million or more for an individual stockholder or $10 million or more for a corporate stockholder, the stockholder must file with the IRS a disclosure statement on Form 8886. Direct stockholders of portfolio securities are in many cases exempted from this reporting requirement, but under current guidance, stockholders of a RIC are not exempted. The fact that a loss is reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayers treatment of the loss is proper. U.S. stockholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their specific circumstances.
Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders
The following discussion only applies to non-U.S. stockholders. A non-U.S. stockholder is a holder that is not a U.S. stockholder for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Whether an investment in the shares is appropriate for a non-U.S. stockholder will depend upon that persons particular circumstances. An investment in the shares by a non-U.S. stockholder may have adverse tax consequences. Non-U.S. stockholders should consult their tax advisors before investing in our shares.
138
Distributions of ordinary income dividends to non-U.S. stockholders, subject to the discussion below, will generally be subject to withholding of federal tax at a 30% rate (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. However, properly reported dividends received by a non-U.S. stockholder are generally exempt from U.S. federal withholding tax when they (1) are paid in respect of our qualified net interest income (generally, our U.S. source interest income, other than certain contingent interest and interest from obligations of a corporation or partnership in which we are at least a 10% stockholder, reduced by expenses that are allocable to such income), or (2) are paid in connection with our qualified short-term capital gains (generally, the excess of our net short-term capital gain over our long-term capital loss for such taxable year). Depending on the circumstances, we may report all, some or none of our potentially eligible dividends as such qualified net interest income or as qualified short-term capital gains, or treat such dividends, in whole or in part, as ineligible for this exemption from withholding. In order to qualify for this exemption from withholding, a non-U.S. stockholder must comply with applicable certification requirements relating to its non-U.S. status (including, in general, furnishing an IRS Form W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E, or an acceptable substitute or successor form). In the case of shares held through an intermediary, the intermediary could withhold even if we report the payment as qualified net interest income or qualified short-term capital gain. Non-U.S. stockholders should contact their intermediaries with respect to the application of these rules to their accounts.
Different tax consequences may result if the non-U.S. stockholder is engaged in a trade or business in the United States or, in the case of an individual, is present in the United States for 183 days or more during a taxable year and certain other conditions are met.
Actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains to a non-U.S. stockholder, and gains recognized by a non-U.S. stockholder upon the sale of our common stock, generally will not be subject to federal withholding tax and will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless the distributions or gains, as the case may be, are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. stockholder or, in the case of an individual, such individual is present in the United States for 183 days or more during a taxable year and certain other conditions are met.
If we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed rather than actual distributions (which we may do in the future), a non-U.S. stockholder will be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax credit or tax refund equal to the stockholders allocable share of the tax we pay on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed. In order to obtain the refund, the non-U.S. stockholder must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file a U.S. federal income tax return even if the non-U.S. stockholder is not otherwise required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number or file a U.S. federal income tax return. For a corporate non-U.S. stockholder, distributions (both actual and deemed), and gains realized upon the sale of our common stock that are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate (or at a lower rate if provided for by an applicable tax treaty). Accordingly, investment in the shares may not be appropriate for certain non-U.S. stockholders.
Backup Withholding. A non-U.S. stockholder who is a non-resident alien individual, and who is otherwise subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax, may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding of federal income tax on dividends unless the non-U.S. stockholder provides us or the dividend paying agent with an IRS Form W-8BEN, Form W-8BEN-E or an acceptable substitute form or otherwise meets documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a non-U.S. stockholder or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld from payments made to you may be refunded or credited against your U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.
Non-U.S. persons should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state, local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in our shares.
139
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
Legislation commonly referred to as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA, generally imposes a 30% withholding tax on payments of certain types of income to foreign financial institutions that fail to enter into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury to report certain required information with respect to accounts held by U.S. persons (or held by foreign entities that have U.S. persons as substantial owners). The types of income subject to the tax include U.S. source interest and dividends, and the gross proceeds from the sale of any property that could produce U.S.-source interest or dividends received after December 31, 2016. The information required to be reported includes the identity and taxpayer identification number of each account holder that is a U.S. person and transaction activity within the holders account. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, this legislation also imposes a 30% withholding on payments to foreign entities that are not financial institutions unless the foreign entity certifies that it does not have a greater than 10% U.S. owner or provides the withholding agent with identifying information on each greater than 10% U.S. owner. Depending on the status of a Non-U.S. Holder and the status of the intermediaries through which they hold their shares, Non-U.S. Holders could be subject to this 30% withholding tax with respect to distributions on their shares and proceeds from the sale of their shares. Under certain circumstances, a Non-U.S. Holder might be eligible for refunds or credits of such taxes.
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE
The NAV per share of our outstanding shares of common stock is determined quarterly by dividing the value of total assets minus liabilities by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding at the date as of which the determination is made.
We carry our investments at fair value, as approved in good faith using written policies and procedures adopted by our board of directors. In calculating the value of our total assets, investments for which market quotations are readily available are recorded in our financial statements at such market quotations subject to any decision by our board of directors to approve a fair value determination to reflect significant events affecting the value of these investments. We value investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair value as approved in good faith by our board of directors based on input from Saratoga Investment Advisors, our audit committee and, on a selected basis, a third party independent valuation firm. Determinations of fair value may involve subjective judgments and estimates. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, market yield trend analysis, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.
Our investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO is carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for similar collateralized loan obligation fund subordinated notes or equity, when available. Specifically, we use Intex cash flow models, or an appropriate substitute, to form the basis for Saratoga CLOs valuation. The models use a set of assumptions including projected default rates, recovery rates, reinvestment rate and prepayment rates in order to arrive at estimated cash flows. The assumptions are based on available market data and projections provided by third parties as well as management estimates. We use the output from the Intex models (i.e., the estimated cash flows from our investment in Saratoga CLO) to perform a discounted cash flows analysis on expected future cash flows from our investment in Saratoga CLO to determine a valuation for the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO held by us.
We undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter when valuing investments for which market quotations are not readily available, as described below:
| each investment is initially valued by the responsible investment professionals of Saratoga Investment Advisors and preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with our senior management; and |
140
| an independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors independently values at least one quarter of our investments each quarter so that the valuation of each investment for which market quotes are not readily available is independently valued by an independent valuation firm at least annually. |
In addition, all our investments are subject to the following valuation process:
| the audit committee of our board of directors reviews each preliminary valuation and our investment adviser and independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee; and |
| our board of directors discusses the valuations and approves the fair value of each investment in good faith based on the input of our investment adviser, independent valuation firm (if applicable) and audit committee. |
Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates.
The determination of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (the FASB), issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). In conjunction with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 105 issued by the FASB in June 2009, FAS 157 has been codified in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United Sates, or GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
ASC 820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values into the following hierarchy:
Level 1 : Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, accessible by the Company at the measurement date.
Level 2 : Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other observable inputs other than quoted prices.
Level 3 : Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
In all cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls will be determined based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to each investment.
The changes to generally accepted accounting principles from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, framework for measuring fair value and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies to fair value measurements already required or permitted by other standards. In accordance with ASC 820, the fair value of our investments is defined as the price that we would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market in which that investment is transacted.
141
Ongoing relationships with and monitoring of portfolio companies
Saratoga Investment Advisors closely monitors each investment we make and, when appropriate, conducts a regular dialogue with both the management team and other debtholders and seeks specifically tailored financial reporting. In addition, in certain circumstances, senior investment professionals of Saratoga Investment Advisors may take board seats or board observation seats.
Determinations in Connection with Offerings
In connection with any offering of shares of our common stock, our board of directors or one of its committees will be required to make the determination that we are not selling shares of our common stock at a price below the then current NAV of our common stock or, if our shareholders have granted us the authority to sell shares of our common stock at a price below the then current NAV per share, at a level consistent with such explicit authority, at the time at which the sale is made. Our board of directors or the applicable committee will consider the following factors, among others, in making such determination:
| the NAV of our common stock most recently disclosed by us in the most recent periodic report that we filed with the SEC; |
| our managements assessment of whether any material change in the NAV of our common stock has occurred (including through the realization of gains on the sale of our portfolio securities) during the period beginning on the date of the most recently disclosed NAV of our common stock in our most recent periodic report that we filed with the SEC and ending two days prior to the date of the sale of our common stock; and |
| the magnitude of the difference between the NAV of our common stock most recently disclosed by us in our most recent periodic report that we filed with the SEC and our managements assessment of any material change in the NAV of our common stock since that determination, and the offering price of the shares of our common stock in the proposed offering. |
The processes and procedures set forth above are part of our compliance policies and procedures. In addition, we will make a record of any such determinations made and such documentation will be maintained in a manner consistent with the Companys other 1940 Act related materials.
142
SALES OF COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
We are not generally able to sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share (i) in connection with a rights offering to our existing stockholders, (ii) with the approval of our common stockholders, or (iii) under such other circumstances as the SEC may permit. For example, we may sell our common stock at a price below the then current net asset value of our common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve our policy and practice of making such sales. We do not have stockholder approval and do not currently intend to seek stockholder approval to allow us to issue common stock at a price below net asset value per share.
Any offering of common stock below its net asset value per share will be designed to raise capital for investment in accordance with our investment objective. In making a determination that an offering of common stock below its net asset value per share is in our and our stockholders best interests, our board of directors will consider a variety of factors including:
| the effect that an offering below net asset value per share would have on our stockholders, including the potential dilution to the net asset value per share of our common stock our stockholders would experience as a result of the offering; |
| the amount per share by which the offering price per share and the net proceeds per share are less than our most recently determined net asset value per share; |
| the relationship of recent market prices of par common stock to net asset value per share and the potential impact of the offering on the market price per share of our common stock; |
| whether the estimated offering price would closely approximate the market value of shares of our common stock; |
| the potential market impact of being able to raise capital during the current financial market difficulties; |
| the nature of any new investors anticipated to acquire shares of our common stock in the offering; |
| the anticipated rate of return on and quality, type and availability of investments; and |
| the leverage available to us. |
Our board of directors will also consider the fact that sales of shares of common stock at a discount will benefit our investment adviser as the investment adviser will earn additional investment management fees on the proceeds of such offerings, as it would from the offering of any other of our securities or from the offering of common stock at a premium to net asset value per share.
Sales by us of our common stock at a discount from net asset value per share pose potential risks for our existing stockholders whether or not they participate in the offering, as well as for new investors who participate in the offering. Any sale of common stock at a price below net asset value per share would result in an immediate dilution to existing common stockholders who do not participate in such sale on at least a pro-rata basis. See Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our Common StockStockholders may incur dilution if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock.
The following three headings and accompanying tables explain and provide hypothetical examples on the impact of an offering of our common stock at a price less than net asset value per share on three different types of investors:
| existing stockholders who do not purchase any shares in the offering; |
143
| existing stockholders who purchase a relatively small amount of shares in the offering or a relatively large amount of shares in the offering; and |
| new investors who become stockholders by purchasing shares in the offering. |
Impact On Existing Stockholders Who Do Not Participate in the Offering
Our current stockholders who do not participate in an offering below net asset value per share or who do not buy additional shares in the secondary market at the same or lower price as we obtain in the offering (after expenses and commissions) face the greatest potential risks. These stockholders will experience an immediate dilution in the net asset value of the shares of common stock they hold and their net asset value per share. These stockholders will also experience a disproportionately greater decrease in their participation in our earnings and assets and in their voting power than the increase we will experience in our assets, potential earning power and voting interests due to such offering. These stockholders may also experience a decline in the market price of their shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or potential increases and decreases in net asset value per share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering and level of discounts increases. Further, if current stockholders do not purchase any shares to maintain their percentage interest, regardless of whether such offering is above or below the then current net asset value, their voting power will be diluted.
The following table illustrates the level of NAV dilution that would be experienced by a nonparticipating stockholder in three different hypothetical offerings of different sizes and levels of discount from NAV per share, all within the ranges provided in the Stockholder Proposal, although it is not possible to predict the level of market price decline that may occur. Actual sales prices and discounts may differ from the presentation below.
The examples assume that Company XYZ has 5,500,000 shares of common stock outstanding, $273,000,000 in total assets and $150,000,000 in total liabilities. The current NAV and NAV per share are thus $123,000,000 and $22.36. The table illustrates the dilutive effect on nonparticipating Stockholder A of (1) the issuance of 550,000 shares (10% of the outstanding shares) at an offering price of $20.12 per share to investors (a 10% discount from NAV); (2) the issuance of 1,100,000 shares (20% of the outstanding shares) at an offering price of $19.01 per share to investors (a 15% discount from NAV); (3) the issuance of 2,200,000 shares (40% of the outstanding shares) at an offering price of $19.01 per share to investors (a 15% discount from NAV); and (4) the issuance of 5,500,000 (100% of the outstanding shares) at an offering price of $19.01 per share to investors (a 15% discount from NAV).
Example 1 10% Offering at 10% Discount |
Example 2 20% Offering at 15% Discount |
Example 3 40% Offering at 15% Discount |
Example 4 100% Offering at 15% Discount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior to Sale Below NAV |
Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offering Price |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per Share to Public |
| $ | 20.12 | | 19.01 | | $ | 19.01 | | $ | 19.01 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer(1) |
| $ | 18.71 | | 17.68 | | $ | 17.68 | | $ | 17.68 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease to NAV |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Shares Outstanding |
5,500,000 | 6,050,000 | 10.00 | % | 6,600,000 | 20.00 | % | 7,700,000 | 40.00 | % | 11,000,000 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
NAV per Share |
22.36 | $ | 22.03 | -1.48 | % | $ | 21.58 | -3.49 | % | $ | 21.03 | -5.97 | % | 20.02 | -10.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dilution to Stockholder |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares Held by Stockholder A |
11,000 | 11,000 | | 11,000 | | 11,000 | | 11,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage Held by Stockholder A |
0.20 | % | 0.18 | % | -9.09 | % | 0.17 | % | -16.67 | % | 0.14 | % | -28.57 | % | 0.10 | % | -50.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Asset Values |
144
Example 1 10% Offering at 10% Discount |
Example 2 20% Offering at 15% Discount |
Example 3 40% Offering at 15% Discount |
Example 4 100% Offering at 15% Discount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior to Sale Below NAV |
Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A |
$ | 245,960 | $ | 242,320 | -1.48 | % | 237,376 | -3.49 | % | $ | 231,276 | -5.97 | % | $ | 220,233 | -10.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $22.36 per Share) |
$ | | $ | 245,960 | | $ | 245,960 | | $ | 245,960 | | $ | 245,960 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Dilution to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total Investment) |
| $ | -3,640 | | -8,584 | | -14,684 | | $ | -25,727 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Amounts |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A |
| $ | 22.03 | | 21.58 | | $ | 21.03 | | $ | 20.02 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $22.36 per Share on Shares Held Prior to Sale) |
$ | | $ | 22.36 | | 22.36 | | $ | 22.36 | | $ | 22.36 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dilution per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less Investment per Share) |
| $ | -0.33 | | $ | -0.78 | | $ | -1.33 | | $ | -2.34 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage Dilution to Stockholder A (Dilution per Share Divided by Investment per Share) |
| | -1.5 | % | | -3.5 | % | | -6.0 | % | | -10.50 | % |
(1) | Assumes 7% issuance discount. |
Impact on Existing Stockholders Who Do Participate in the Offering
Our existing stockholders who participate in an offering below net asset value per share or who buy additional shares in the secondary market at the same or lower price as we obtain in the offering (after expenses and commissions) will experience the same types of net asset value dilution as the nonparticipating stockholders, albeit at a lower level, to the extent they purchase less than the same percentage of the discounted offering as their interest in our shares immediately prior to the offering. The level of net asset value dilution to such stockholders will decrease as the number of shares such stockholders purchase increases. Existing stockholders who buy more than their proportionate percentage will experience net asset value dilution but will, in contrast to existing stockholders who purchase less than their proportionate share of the offering, experience an increase (often called accretion) in net asset value per share over their investment per share and will also experience a disproportionately greater increase in their participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than our increase in assets, potential earning power and voting interests due to the offering. The level of accretion will increase as the excess number of shares purchased by such stockholder increases. Even a stockholder who over-participates will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make additional discounted offerings in which such stockholder does not participate, in which case such a stockholder will experience net asset value dilution as described above in any subsequent offerings. These stockholders may also experience a decline in the market price of their shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or potential decreases in net asset value per share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering and the level of discount to net asset value increases.
145
The following chart illustrates the level of dilution and accretion in the hypothetical 20% offering at a 15% discount from the prior chart (Example 3) for a stockholder that acquires shares equal to (1) 50% of its proportionate share of the offering (i.e., 1,100) shares, which is 0.1% of an offering of 1,100,000 shares rather than its 0.2% proportionate share) and (2) 150% of such percentage (i.e., 3,300 shares, which is 0.3% of an offering of 1,100,000 shares rather than its 0.2% proportionate share). The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any discounted offering is made will include a chart for this example based on the actual number of shares in such offering and the actual discount from the most recently determined NAV per share.
50% Participation | 150% Participation | |||||||||||||||||||
Prior to Sale Below NAV |
Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | ||||||||||||||||
Offering Price |
||||||||||||||||||||
Price per Share to Public |
| $ | 19.01 | | % | $ | 19.01 | | % | |||||||||||
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer(1) |
| $ | 17.68 | | % | $ | 17.68 | | % | |||||||||||
Increase in Shares and Decrease to NAV |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Shares Outstanding |
5,500,000 | 6,600,000 | 20 | % | 6,600,000 | 20 | % | |||||||||||||
NAV per share |
$ | 22.36 | $ | 21.58 | -3.49 | % | $ | 21.58 | -3.49 | % | ||||||||||
Dilution/Accretion to Participating Stockholder A |
||||||||||||||||||||
Share Dilution/Accretion |
||||||||||||||||||||
Shares Held by Stockholder A |
11,000 | 12,100 | 10 | % | 14,300 | 30 | % | |||||||||||||
Percentage Outstanding Held by Stockholder A |
0.2 | % | 0.18 | % | -8.33 | % | 0.21 | % | 8.33 | % | ||||||||||
NAV Dilution/Accretion |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A |
$ | 245,960 | $ | 261,118 | 6.16 | % | $ | 308,594 | 25.47 | % | ||||||||||
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $22.36 per Share on Shares Held Prior to Sale) |
| $ | 265,408 | | $ | 304,304 | | |||||||||||||
Total Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total Investment) |
$ | | $ | -4,290 | -1.64 | % | $ | 4,290 | 1.39 | % | ||||||||||
NAV Dilution/Accretion per Share |
||||||||||||||||||||
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A |
$ | | $ | 21.58 | -3.49 | % | $ | 21.58 | -3.49 | % | ||||||||||
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $22.36 per Share on Shares Held Prior to Sale) |
$ | | $ | 21.93 | | % | $ | 21.28 | | % | ||||||||||
NAV Dilution/Accretion per Share Experienced by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less Investment per Share) |
| $ | -0.35 | | % | $ | 0.30 | | % | |||||||||||
Percentage NAV Dilution/Accretion Experienced by Stockholder A (NAV Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided by Investment per Share) |
| | -1.60 | % | | 1.41 | % |
(1) | Assumes 7% issuance discount. |
Impact on New Investors
Investors who are not currently stockholders, but who participate in an offering below NAV and whose investment per share is greater than the resulting NAV per share due to selling compensation and expenses paid by us will experience an immediate decrease, albeit small, in the NAV of their shares and their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their shares (Example 1 below). On the other hand, investors who are not currently stockholders, but who participate in an offering below NAV per share and whose investment per share is also less than the resulting NAV per share will experience an immediate increase in the NAV of their shares and their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their shares (Examples 2 and 3 below). These latter investors will experience a disproportionately greater participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than our increase in assets, potential earning power and voting interests. These investors will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make additional discounted offerings in which such new stockholder does not participate, in which case such new stockholder will experience dilution as described above in any subsequent offerings. These investors may also experience a decline in the market price of their shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or potential decreases in NAV per share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering and level of discount to NAV increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of dilution or accretion for new investors that would be experienced by a new investor in the same hypothetical discounted offerings as described in the first chart above. The
146
illustration is for a new investor who purchases the same percentage (0.20%) of the shares in the offering as Stockholder A in the prior examples held immediately prior to the offering. The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any discounted offering is made will include a chart for these examples based on the actual number of shares in such offering and the actual discount from the most recently determined NAV per share.
Prior to Sale Below NAV |
Example 1 10% Offering at 10% Discount |
Example 2 20% Offering at 15% Discount |
Example 3 40% Offering at 15% Discount |
Example 4 100% Offering at 15% Discount |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | Following Sale |
% Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offering Price |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per Share to |
| $ | 20.12 | | $ | 19.01 | | % | $ | 19.01 | | % | $ | 19.01 | | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer |
| $ | 18.71 | | $ | 17.68 | | % | $ | 17.68 | | % | $ | 17.68 | | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in Shares and Decrease to NAV |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Shares Outstanding |
5,500,000 | 6,050,000 | 10 | % | 6,600,000 | 20 | % | 7,700,000 | 40 | % | 11,000,000 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
NAV per Share |
$ | 22.36 | $ | 22.03 | -1.48 | % | $ | 21.58 | -3.49 | % | $ | 21.03 | -5.99 | % | $ | 20.02 | -10.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Dilution/Accretion to New Investor A |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share Dilution |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares held by Investor A |
| 1,100 | | % | 2,200 | | % | 4,400 | | % | 11,000 | | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage Outstanding Held by Investor A |
| % | 0.02 | % | | % | 0.03 | % | | % | 0.06 | | % | 0.10 | | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NAV Dilution |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total NAV Held by Investor A |
| $ | 22,030 | | % | $ | 47,476 | | % | $ | 92,532 | | % | $ | 220,220 | | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment by Investor A (At Price to Public) |
| $ | 18,710 | | % | $ | 38,896 | | % | $ | 77,792 | | % | $ | 194,480 | | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Total NAV Less Total Investment) |
| $ | 3,720 | 17.74 | % | $ | 8,580 | 22.06 | % | $ | 14,740 | 18.95 | % | $ | 25,740 | 13.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
NAV Dilution per Share |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAV per Share Held by Investor A |
| $ | 22.03 | | % | $ | 21.58 | | % | $ | 21.03 | | % | $ | 20.02 | | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment per Share Held by Investor A |
| $ | 18.71 | | % | $ | 17.68 | | % | $ | 17.68 | | % | $ | 17.68 | | % | |||||||||||||||||||
NAV Dilution/Accretion per Share Experienced by Investor A (NAV per Share Less Investment per Share) |
| $ | 3.32 | | % | $ | 3.90 | | % | $ | 3.35 | | % | $ | 2.34 | | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Percentage NAV Dilution/Accretion Experienced by Investor A (NAV Dilution/ Accretion per Share Divided by Investment per Share) |
| | 17.74 | % | | 22.06 | % | | 18.95 | % | | 13.24 | % |
147
DESCRIPTION OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
The following description is based on relevant portions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws, which we collectively refer to as our governing documents.
As of the date of this prospectus, our authorized stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of capital stock, $0.001 par value per share, all of which are designated as shares of common stock. Our common stock trades under the symbol SAR on the New York Stock Exchange. There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase our common stock. No shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans. Under Maryland law, our stockholders generally are not personally liable for our debts or obligations.
Under our governing documents, our board of directors is authorized to create new classes or series of shares of stock and to authorize the issuance of shares of stock without obtaining stockholder approval. Our charter provides that the board of directors, without any action by our stockholders, may amend the charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue.
Common Stock
Each share of our common stock has equal rights as to earnings, assets, dividends and voting and all of our outstanding shares of common stock are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. Distributions may be paid to the holders of our common stock if, as and when authorized by our board of directors and declared by us out of funds legally available therefor. Shares of our common stock have no preemptive, exchange, conversion or redemption rights.
In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each share of common stock would be entitled to share ratably in all of our assets that are legally available for distribution after we pay all debts and other liabilities and subject to any preferential rights of holders of shares of our preferred stock, if any are outstanding at such time. Each share of our common stock entitles its holder to cast one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election and removal of directors.
The following table sets forth information regarding our authorized shares of stock under our charter and shares of stock outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.
Title of Class |
Shares Authorized | Amount Held by Us or for Our Account |
Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Amount Held by Us or for Our Account |
|||||||||
Common Stock |
100,000,000 | | 5,794,600 |
Preferred Stock
Our governing documents authorize our board of directors to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock, including preferred stock. Prior to the issuance of shares of stock of each class or series, the board of directors is required by our governing documents to set the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each class or series of shares of stock. Thus, the board of directors could authorize the issuance of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or otherwise be in their best interest. In addition, as a business development company, any issuance of preferred stock must comply with the requirements of the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act requires, among other things, that (1) immediately after issuance and before any dividend or other distribution is made with respect to our common stock and before any purchase of common stock is made, the aggregate
148
dividend or distribution on, or purchase price of, such shares of preferred stock together with all other indebtedness and senior securities must not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total assets after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution or purchase price, as the case may be, and (2) the holders of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the directors if dividends on such preferred stock is in arrears by two years or more. Certain matters under the 1940 Act require the separate vote of the holders of any issued and outstanding shares of preferred stock. We believe that the availability for issuance of preferred stock will provide us with increased flexibility in structuring future financings and acquisitions.
Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and Advance of Expenses
The Maryland General Corporation Law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. Our governing documents contain a provision which eliminates directors and officers liability to the maximum extent permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which, our charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made or threatened to be made a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made or are threatened to be made a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad faith or (2) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly received unless, in either case, a court orders indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the corporations receipt of (a) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the corporation and (b) a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
Our charter authorizes us to obligate ourselves, and our bylaws do obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify and to pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to (1) any present or former director or officer or (2) any individual who, while a director or officer and at our request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner, manager, member or trustee, from and against any claim or liability to which that person may become subject for which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in such capacity. Our charter and bylaws also permit indemnification and the advancement of expenses to any person who served a predecessor to Saratoga Investment Corp. in any of the capacities described above and any of our employees or agents or any employees or agents of such predecessor.
As a business development company, and in accordance with the 1940 Act, we will not indemnify any person for any liability to which such person would be subject by reason of such persons willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
149
In addition to the indemnification provided for in our bylaws, we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our current directors and officers and we intend to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our future directors and officers. The indemnification agreements attempt to provide these directors and officers the maximum indemnification permitted under Maryland law and the 1940 Act. The agreements provide, among other things, for the advancement of expenses and indemnification for liabilities incurred which such person may incur by reason of his or her status as a present or former director or officer in any action or proceeding arising out of the performance of such persons services as a present or former director or officer.
Provisions of Our Governing Documents and the Maryland General Corporation Law
Our governing documents and the Maryland General Corporation Law contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a potential acquiror to acquire us by means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are expected to discourage certain coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to negotiate first with our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of these provisions outweigh the potential disadvantages of discouraging any such acquisition proposals because, among other things, the negotiation of such proposals may improve their terms.
Classified Board of Directors
Our board of directors is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. Directors of each class are elected to serve for three-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, and each year one class of directors is elected by the stockholders. A classified board may render a change in control of us or removal of our incumbent management more difficult. We believe, however, that the longer time required to elect a majority of a classified board of directors will help to ensure the continuity and stability of our management and policies.
Number of Directors; Vacancies; Removal
Our governing documents provide that the number of directors will be set only by our board of directors in accordance with our bylaws. Our bylaws provide that a majority of our entire board of directors may at any time increase or decrease the number of directors. However, unless our bylaws are amended, the number of directors may never be less than three nor more than eleven. Our charter provides that, except as may be provided by the board of directors in setting the terms of any class or series of shares of stock, so long as we have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act and at least three independent directors, any and all vacancies on the board of directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies, subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. If there are no directors then in office, vacancies may be filled by stockholders at a special meeting called for such purpose. Our charter provides that a director may be removed only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of directors.
Election of Directors
Our charter and bylaws provide that the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote in the election of directors will be required to elect each director. Pursuant to our charter and bylaws, our board of directors may amend the bylaws to alter the vote required to elect directors.
Action by Stockholders
All of our outstanding shares of common stock will generally be able to vote on any matter that is a proper subject for action by the stockholders of a Maryland corporation, including in respect of the election or removal of
150
directors as well as other extraordinary matters. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law, stockholder action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of stockholders or by written or electronically-transmitted unanimous consent in lieu of a meeting. These provisions, combined with the requirements of our governing documents regarding the calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting of stockholder discussed below, may have the effect of delaying consideration of a stockholder proposal until the next annual meeting.
Advance Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and Stockholder Proposals
Our bylaws provide that, with respect to an annual meeting of our stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to the board of directors and the proposal of business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by or at the direction of the board of directors, (3) by any stockholder who is a stockholder of record both at the time of giving notice by the stockholder and at the time of the annual meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice procedures of the bylaws. With respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the meeting. Nominations of individuals for election to the board of directors at a special meeting may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by or at the direction of the board of directors, (3) provided that the board of directors has determined that directors will be elected at the meeting, by a stockholder who is a stockholder of record both at the time of giving notice by the stockholder and at the time of the special meeting and who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of our bylaws or (4) by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting in circumstances in which a special meeting of stockholders is called for the purpose of electing directors when no directors remain in office.
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give us advance notice of nominations and other business is to afford our board of directors a meaningful opportunity to consider the qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of any other proposed business and, to the extent deemed necessary or desirable by our board of directors, to inform stockholders and make recommendations about such qualifications or business, as well as to provide a more orderly procedure for conducting meetings of stockholders. Although our bylaws do not give our board of directors any power to disapprove stockholder nominations for the election of directors or proposals recommending certain action, they may have the effect of precluding a contest for the election of directors or the consideration of stockholder proposals if proper procedures are not followed and of discouraging or deterring a third party from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of directors or to approve its own proposal without regard to whether consideration of such nominees or proposals might be harmful or beneficial to us and our stockholders.
Calling of Special Meetings of Stockholders
Our bylaws provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called by our board of directors and certain of our officers. Additionally, our bylaws provide that, subject to the satisfaction of certain procedural and informational requirements by the stockholders requesting the meeting, a special meeting of our stockholders will be called by our secretary upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at such meeting, except that, if no directors remain in office, a special meeting of our stockholders shall be called to elect directors by the secretary upon the written request of holders entitled to cast at least 10% of the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of directors.
Amendment of Governing Documents
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve or amend its charter unless the corporations board of directors declares the dissolution or amendment to be advisable and the dissolution or amendment is approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. A Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Our charter
151
generally provides for approval of amendments to our charter by the stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, our charter also provides that certain charter amendments and proposals for our liquidation, dissolution or conversion, whether by merger or otherwise, from a closed-end company to an open-end company require the approval of the stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds percent of the votes entitled to be cast on such matter. If such amendment or proposal is approved by at least two-thirds of our continuing directors (in addition to approval by our board of directors), such amendment or proposal may be approved by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such a matter. The continuing directors are, as defined in our charter, our current directors as well as those directors whose nomination for election by the stockholders or whose election by the directors to fill vacancies is approved by a majority of the continuing directors then on the board of directors.
Our governing documents provide that the board of directors has the exclusive power to adopt, alter or repeal any provision of our bylaws and to make new bylaws.
Approval of Extraordinary Actions
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business, unless the corporations board of directors declares action or transaction to be advisable and the action or transaction is approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. A Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.
Except for a merger that would result in our conversion to an open-end company, which requires the approval described above, our charter provides that we may merge, sell all or substantially all of our assets, engage in a consolidation or share exchange or engage in similar transactions, if such transaction is declared advisable by our board of directors and approved by a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.
No Appraisal Rights
Except with respect to appraisal rights arising in connection with the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act discussed below, as permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our governing documents provide that our stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal rights unless a majority of our board of directors determines that such rights will apply with respect to all or any classes or series of stock, to one or more transactions occurring after the date of such determination in connection with which holders of such shares would otherwise be entitled to exercise appraisal rights.
Control Share Acquisitions
The Control Share Acquisition Act provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquiror, by officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquiror or in respect of which the acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
| one-tenth or more but less than one-third; |
| one-third or more but less than a majority; or |
| a majority or more of all voting power. |
152
The requisite stockholder approval must be obtained each time an acquiror crosses one of the thresholds of voting power set forth above. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition may compel the board of directors of the corporation to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including an undertaking to pay the expenses of the meeting. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any stockholder meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement as required by the statute, then the corporation may repurchase for fair value any or all of the control shares, except those for which voting rights have previously been approved. The right of the corporation to repurchase control shares is subject to certain conditions and limitations, including, as provided in our bylaws, compliance with the 1940 Act, which will prohibit any such repurchase other than in limited circumstances. Fair value is determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting rights of the shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a stockholder meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for purposes of appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid by the acquiror in the control share acquisition.
The Control Share Acquisition Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation.
Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our common stock. Such provision could also be amended or eliminated at any time in the future. However, we will amend our bylaws to be subject to the Control Share Acquisition Act only if the board of directors determines that it would be in our best interests and if the SEC does not object to our determination that our being subject to the Control Share Acquisition Act does not conflict with the 1940 Act.
Business Combinations
Under Maryland law, business combinations between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
| any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the corporations stock; or |
| an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of the corporation. |
A person is not an interested stockholder under this statute if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which he otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the board.
153
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
| 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and |
| two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder. |
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporations stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares.
The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the board of directors before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Our board of directors has adopted a resolution exempting from the provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act any business combination between us and any other person. If our board of directors adopts resolutions causing us to be subject to the provisions of the Business Combination Act, these provisions may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Conflict with 1940 Act
Our bylaws provide that, if and to the extent that any provision of the Maryland General Corporation Law, including the Control Share Acquisition Act or the Business Combination Act (if we amend our bylaws to be subject to such Acts), or any provision of our charter or bylaws conflicts with any provision of the 1940 Act, the applicable provision of the 1940 Act will control.
DESCRIPTION OF OUR SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS
We may issue subscription rights to purchase common stock. Subscription rights may be issued independently or together with any other offered security and may or may not be transferable by the person purchasing or receiving the subscription rights. In connection with any subscription rights offering to our stockholders, we may enter into a standby underwriting or other arrangement with one or more underwriters or other persons pursuant to which such underwriters or other persons would purchase any offered securities remaining unsubscribed for after such subscription rights offering. We will not offer transferable subscription rights to our stockholders at a price equivalent to less than the then current net asset value per share of common stock, excluding underwriting commissions, unless we first file a post-effective amendment that is declared effective by the SEC with respect to such issuance and the common stock to be purchased in connection with the rights represents no more than one-third of our outstanding common stock at the time such rights are issued (i.e., the right to purchase one new share for a minimum of every three rights held). In connection with a subscription rights offering to our stockholders, we would distribute certificates evidencing the subscription rights and a prospectus supplement to our stockholders on the record date that we set for receiving subscription rights in such subscription rights offering. Our common stockholders will indirectly bear the expenses of such subscription rights offerings, regardless of whether our common stockholders exercise any subscription rights.
The applicable prospectus supplement would describe the following terms of subscription rights in respect of which this prospectus is being delivered:
| the title of such subscription rights; |
| the exercise price or a formula for the determination of the exercise price for such subscription rights; |
154
| the number or a formula for the determination of the number of such subscription rights issued to each stockholder; |
| the extent to which such subscription rights are transferable; |
| if applicable, a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to the issuance or exercise of such subscription rights; |
| the date on which the right to exercise such subscription rights would commence, and the date on which such rights shall expire (subject to any extension); |
| the extent to which such subscription rights include an over-subscription privilege with respect to unsubscribed securities; |
| if applicable, the material terms of any standby underwriting or other purchase arrangement that we may enter into in connection with the subscription rights offering; and |
| any other terms of such subscription rights, including terms, procedures and limitations relating to the exchange and exercise of such subscription rights. |
Exercise of Subscription Rights
Each subscription right would entitle the holder of the subscription right to purchase for cash such amount of shares of common stock or other securities at such exercise price as shall in each case be set forth in, or be determinable as set forth in, the prospectus supplement relating to the subscription rights offered thereby or another report filed with the SEC. Subscription rights may be exercised at any time up to the close of business on the expiration date for such subscription rights set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. After the close of business on the expiration date, all unexercised subscription rights would become void. We have not previously completed such an offering of subscription rights.
Subscription rights may be exercised as set forth in the prospectus supplement relating to the subscription rights offered thereby. Upon receipt of payment and the subscription rights certificate properly completed and duly executed at the corporate trust office of the subscription rights agent or any other office indicated in the prospectus supplement, we will forward, as soon as practicable, the shares of common stock or other securities purchasable upon such exercise. We may determine to offer any unsubscribed offered securities directly to stockholders, persons other than stockholders, to or through agents, underwriters or dealers or through a combination of such methods, including pursuant to standby underwriting or other arrangements, as set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement.
155
DESCRIPTION OF OUR DEBT SECURITIES
We may issue debt securities in one or more series. The specific terms of each series of debt securities will be described in the particular prospectus supplement relating to that series. The prospectus supplement may or may not modify the general terms found in this prospectus and will be filed with the SEC. For a complete description of the terms of a particular series of debt securities, you should read both this prospectus and the prospectus supplement relating to that particular series.
As required by federal law for all bonds and notes of companies that are publicly offered, the debt securities are governed by a document called an indenture. An indenture is a contract between us and the financial institution acting as trustee on your behalf, and is subject to and governed by the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. The trustee has two main roles. First, the trustee can enforce your rights against us if we default. There are some limitations on the extent to which the trustee acts on your behalf, described in the second paragraph under Events of DefaultRemedies if an Event of Default Occurs. Second, the trustee performs certain administrative duties for us with respect to our debt securities.
All the material terms of the indenture and the supplemental indenture, as well as an explanation of your rights as a holder of debt securities, are described in this prospectus and in the prospectus supplement accompanying this prospectus. Because this section is a summary, however, it does not describe every aspect of the debt securities and the indenture. We urge you to read the indenture because it, and not this description, defines your rights as a holder of debt securities. We have filed a form of the indenture with the SEC. See Available Information for information on how to obtain a copy of the indenture. We will file a supplemental indenture with the SEC in connection with any debt offering, at which time the supplemental indenture would be publicly available.
The prospectus supplement, which will accompany this prospectus, will describe the particular series of debt securities being offered by including:
| the designation or title of the series of debt securities; |
| the total principal amount of the series of debt securities; |
| the percentage of the principal amount at which the series of debt securities will be offered; |
| the date or dates on which principal will be payable; |
| the rate or rates (which may be either fixed or variable) and/or the method of determining such rate or rates of interest, if any; |
| the date or dates from which any interest will accrue, or the method of determining such date or dates, and the date or dates on which any interest will be payable; |
| whether any interest may be paid by issuing additional securities of the same series in lieu of cash (and the terms upon which any such interest may be paid by issuing additional securities); |
| the terms for redemption, extension or early repayment, if any; |
| the currencies in which the series of debt securities are issued and payable; |
| whether the amount of payments of principal, premium or interest, if any, on a series of debt securities will be determined with reference to an index, formula or other method (which could be based on one or more currencies, commodities, equity indices or other indices) and how these amounts will be determined; |
| the place or places, if any, other than or in addition to the Borough of Manhattan in the City of New York, of payment, transfer, conversion and/or exchange of the debt securities; |
| the denominations in which the offered debt securities will be issued (if other than $1,000 and any integral multiple thereof); |
156
| the provision for any sinking fund; |
| any restrictive covenants; |
| any Events of Default (as defined in Events of Default below); |
| whether the series of debt securities are issuable in certificated form; |
| any provisions for defeasance or covenant defeasance; |
| any special federal income tax implications, including, if applicable, federal income tax considerations relating to original issue discount; |
| whether and under what circumstances we will pay additional amounts in respect of any tax, assessment or governmental charge and, if so, whether we will have the option to redeem the debt securities rather than pay the additional amounts (and the terms of this option); |
| any provisions for convertibility or exchangeability of the debt securities into or for any other securities; |
| whether the debt securities are subject to subordination and the terms of such subordination; |
| whether the debt securities are secured and the terms of any security interest; |
| the listing, if any, on a securities exchange; and |
| any other terms. |
The debt securities may be secured or unsecured obligations. Unless the prospectus supplement states otherwise, principal (and premium, if any) and interest, if any, will be paid by us in immediately available funds.
We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance after giving effect to any exemptive relief granted to us by the SEC. In addition, while any indebtedness and senior securities remain outstanding, we must make provisions to prohibit the distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. For a discussion of the risks associated with leverage, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our Business and StructureRegulations governing our operation as a BDC will affect our ability to raise additional capital.
General
The indenture provides that any debt securities proposed to be sold under this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement (offered debt securities) and any debt securities issuable upon the exercise of warrants or upon conversion or exchange of other offered securities (underlying debt securities) may be issued under the indenture in one or more series.
For purposes of this prospectus, any reference to the payment of principal of, or premium or interest, if any, on, debt securities will include additional amounts if required by the terms of the debt securities.
The indenture does not limit the amount of debt securities that may be issued thereunder from time to time. Debt securities issued under the indenture, when a single trustee is acting for all debt securities issued under the indenture, are called the indenture securities. The indenture also provides that there may be more than one trustee thereunder, each with respect to one or more different series of indenture securities. See Resignation of Trustee below. At a time when two or more trustees are acting under the indenture, each with respect to only certain series, the term indenture securities means the one or more series of debt securities with respect to which each respective trustee is acting. In the event that there is more than one trustee under the indenture, the
157
powers and trust obligations of each trustee described in this prospectus will extend only to the one or more series of indenture securities for which it is trustee. If two or more trustees are acting under the indenture, then the indenture securities for which each trustee is acting would be treated as if issued under separate indentures.
The indenture does not contain any provisions that give you protection in the event we issue a large amount of debt or we are acquired by another entity.
We refer you to the prospectus supplement for information with respect to any deletions from, modifications of or additions to the Events of Default or our covenants that are described below, including any addition of a covenant or other provision providing event risk protection or similar protection.
We have the ability to issue indenture securities with terms different from those of indenture securities previously issued and, without the consent of the holders thereof, to reopen a previous issue of a series of indenture securities and issue additional indenture securities of that series unless the reopening was restricted when that series was created.
Conversion and Exchange
If any debt securities are convertible into or exchangeable for other securities, the prospectus supplement will explain the terms and conditions of the conversion or exchange, including the conversion price or exchange ratio (or the calculation method), the conversion or exchange period (or how the period will be determined), if conversion or exchange will be mandatory or at the option of the holder or us, provisions for adjusting the conversion price or the exchange ratio and provisions affecting conversion or exchange in the event of the redemption of the underlying debt securities. These terms may also include provisions under which the number or amount of other securities to be received by the holders of the debt securities upon conversion or exchange would be calculated according to the market price of the other securities as of a time stated in the prospectus supplement.
Issuance of Securities in Registered Form
We may issue the debt securities in registered form, in which case we may issue them either in book-entry form only or in certificated form. Debt securities issued in book-entry form will be represented by global securities. We expect that we will usually issue debt securities in book-entry only form represented by global securities.
Book-Entry Holders
We will issue registered debt securities in book-entry form only, unless we specify otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement. This means debt securities will be represented by one or more global securities registered in the name of a depositary that will hold them on behalf of financial institutions that participate in the depositarys book-entry system. These participating institutions, in turn, hold beneficial interests in the debt securities held by the depositary or its nominee. These institutions may hold these interests on behalf of themselves or customers.
Under the indenture, only the person in whose name a debt security is registered is recognized as the holder of that debt security. Consequently, for debt securities issued in book-entry form, we will recognize only the depositary as the holder of the debt securities and we will make all payments on the debt securities to the depositary. The depositary will then pass along the payments it receives to its participants, which in turn will pass the payments along to their customers who are the beneficial owners. The depositary and its participants do so under agreements they have made with one another or with their customers; they are not obligated to do so under the terms of the debt securities.
158
As a result, investors will not own debt securities directly. Instead, they will own beneficial interests in a global security, through a bank, broker or other financial institution that participates in the depositarys book-entry system or holds an interest through a participant. As long as the debt securities are represented by one or more global securities, investors will be indirect holders, and not holders, of the debt securities.
Street Name Holders
In the future, we may issue debt securities in certificated form or terminate a global security. In these cases, investors may choose to hold their debt securities in their own names or in street name. Debt securities held in street name are registered in the name of a bank, broker or other financial institution chosen by the investor, and the investor would hold a beneficial interest in those debt securities through the account he or she maintains at that institution.
For debt securities held in street name, we will recognize only the intermediary banks, brokers and other financial institutions in whose names the debt securities are registered as the holders of those debt securities, and we will make all payments on those debt securities to them. These institutions will pass along the payments they receive to their customers who are the beneficial owners, but only because they agree to do so in their customer agreements or because they are legally required to do so. Investors who hold debt securities in street name will be indirect holders, and not holders, of the debt securities.
Legal Holders
Our obligations, as well as the obligations of the applicable trustee and those of any third parties employed by us or the applicable trustee, run only to the legal holders of the debt securities. We do not have obligations to investors who hold beneficial interests in global securities, in street name or by any other indirect means. This will be the case whether an investor chooses to be an indirect holder of a debt security or has no choice because we are issuing the debt securities only in book-entry form.
For example, once we make a payment or give a notice to the holder, we have no further responsibility for the payment or notice even if that holder is required, under agreements with depositary participants or customers or by law, to pass it along to the indirect holders but does not do so. Similarly, if we want to obtain the approval of the holders for any purpose (for example, to amend an indenture or to relieve us of the consequences of a default or of our obligation to comply with a particular provision of an indenture), we would seek the approval only from the holders, and not the indirect holders, of the debt securities. Whether and how the holders contact the indirect holders is up to the holders.
When we refer to you in this Description of Our Debt Securities, we mean those who invest in the debt securities being offered by this prospectus, whether they are the holders or only indirect holders of those debt securities. When we refer to your debt securities, we mean the debt securities in which you hold a direct or indirect interest.
Special Considerations for Indirect Holders
If you hold debt securities through a bank, broker or other financial institution, either in book-entry form or in street name, we urge you to check with that institution to find out:
| how it handles securities payments and notices; |
| whether it imposes fees or charges; |
| how it would handle a request for the holders consent, if ever required; |
| whether and how you can instruct it to send you debt securities registered in your own name so you can be a holder, if that is permitted in the future for a particular series of debt securities; |
159
| how it would exercise rights under the debt securities if there were a default or other event triggering the need for holders to act to protect their interests; and |
| if the debt securities are in book-entry form, how the depositarys rules and procedures will affect these matters. |
Global Securities
As noted above, we usually will issue debt securities as registered securities in book-entry form only. A global security represents one or any other number of individual debt securities. Generally, all debt securities represented by the same global securities will have the same terms.
Each debt security issued in book-entry form will be represented by a global security that we deposit with and register in the name of a financial institution or its nominee that we select. The financial institution that we select for this purpose is called the depositary. Unless we specify otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, known as DTC, will be the depositary for all debt securities issued in book-entry form.
A global security may not be transferred to or registered in the name of anyone other than the depositary or its nominee, unless special termination situations arise. We describe those situations below under Termination of a Global Security. As a result of these arrangements, the depositary, or its nominee, will be the sole registered owner and holder of all debt securities represented by a global security, and investors will be permitted to own only beneficial interests in a global security. Beneficial interests must be held by means of an account with a broker, bank or other financial institution that in turn has an account with the depositary or with another institution that has an account with the depositary. Thus, an investor whose security is represented by a global security will not be a holder of the debt security, but only an indirect holder of a beneficial interest in the global security.
Special Considerations for Global Securities
As an indirect holder, an investors rights relating to a global security will be governed by the account rules of the investors financial institution and of the depositary, as well as general laws relating to securities transfers. The depositary that holds the global security will be considered the holder of the debt securities represented by the global security.
If debt securities are issued only in the form of a global security, an investor should be aware of the following:
| an investor cannot cause the debt securities to be registered in his or her name and cannot obtain certificates for his or her interest in the debt securities, except in the special situations we describe below; |
| an investor will be an indirect holder and must look to his or her own bank or broker for payments on the debt securities and protection of his or her legal rights relating to the debt securities, as we describe under Issuance of Securities in Registered Form above; |
| an investor may not be able to sell interests in the debt securities to some insurance companies and other institutions that are required by law to own their securities in non-book-entry form; |
| an investor may not be able to pledge his or her interest in a global security in circumstances where certificates representing the debt securities must be delivered to the lender or other beneficiary of the pledge in order for the pledge to be effective; |
| the depositarys policies, which may change from time to time, will govern payments, transfers, exchanges and other matters relating to an investors interest in a global security. We and the trustee have no responsibility for any aspect of the depositarys actions or for its records of ownership interests in a global security. We and the trustee also do not supervise the depositary in any way; |
160
| if we redeem less than all the debt securities of a particular series being redeemed, DTCs practice is to determine by lot the amount to be redeemed from each of its participants holding that series; |
| an investor is required to give notice of exercise of any option to elect repayment of its debt securities, through its participant, to the applicable trustee and to deliver the related debt securities by causing its participant to transfer its interest in those debt securities, on DTCs records, to the applicable trustee; |
| DTC requires that those who purchase and sell interests in a global security deposited in its book-entry system use immediately available funds; your broker or bank may also require you to use immediately available funds when purchasing or selling interests in a global security; and |
| financial institutions that participate in the depositarys book-entry system, and through which an investor holds its interest in a global security, may also have their own policies affecting payments, notices and other matters relating to the debt securities; there may be more than one financial intermediary in the chain of ownership for an investor; we do not monitor and are not responsible for the actions of any of those intermediaries. |
Termination of a Global Security
If a global security is terminated for any reason, interests in it will be exchanged for certificates in non-book-entry form (certificated securities). After that exchange, the choice of whether to hold the certificated debt securities directly or in street name will be up to the investor. Investors must consult their own banks or brokers to find out how to have their interests in a global security transferred on termination to their own names, so that they will be holders. We have described the rights of legal holders and street name investors under Issuance of Securities in Registered Form above.
The prospectus supplement may list situations for terminating a global security that would apply only to the particular series of debt securities covered by the prospectus supplement. If a global security is terminated, only the depositary, and not we or the applicable trustee, is responsible for deciding the investors in whose names the debt securities represented by the global security will be registered and, therefore, who will be the holders of those debt securities.
Payment and Paying Agents
We will pay interest to the person listed in the applicable trustees records as the owner of the debt security at the close of business on a particular day in advance of each due date for interest, even if that person no longer owns the debt security on the interest due date. That day, usually about two weeks in advance of the interest due date, is called the record date. Because we will pay all the interest for an interest period to the holders on the record date, holders buying and selling debt securities must work out between themselves the appropriate purchase price. The most common manner is to adjust the sales price of the debt securities to prorate interest fairly between buyer and seller based on their respective ownership periods within the particular interest period. This prorated interest amount is called accrued interest.
Payments on Global Securities
We will make payments on a global security in accordance with the applicable policies of the depositary as in effect from time to time. Under those policies, we will make payments directly to the depositary, or its nominee, and not to any indirect holders who own beneficial interests in the global security. An indirect holders right to those payments will be governed by the rules and practices of the depositary and its participants, as described under Special Considerations for Global Securities.
Payments on Certificated Securities
We will make payments on a certificated debt security as follows. We will pay interest that is due on an interest payment date to the holder of debt securities as shown on the trustees records as of the close of business
161
on the regular record date at our office and/or at other offices that may be specified in the prospectus supplement. We will make all payments of principal and premium, if any, by check at the office of the applicable trustee and/or at other offices that may be specified in the prospectus supplement or in a notice to holders against surrender of the debt security.
Alternatively, at our option, we may pay any cash interest that becomes due on the debt security by mailing a check to the holder at his, her or its address shown on the trustees records as of the close of business on the regular record date or by transfer to an account at a bank in the United States, in either case, on the due date.
Payment When Offices Are Closed
If any payment is due on a debt security on a day that is not a business day, we will make the payment on the next day that is a business day. Payments made on the next business day in this situation will be treated under the indenture as if they were made on the original due date, except as otherwise indicated in the attached prospectus supplement. Such payment will not result in a default under any debt security or the indenture, and no interest will accrue on the payment amount from the original due date to the next day that is a business day.
Book-entry and other indirect holders should consult their banks or brokers for information on how they will receive payments on their debt securities.
Events of Default
You will have rights if an Event of Default occurs in respect of the debt securities of your series and is not cured, as described later in this subsection.
The term Event of Default in respect of the debt securities of your series means any of the following:
| we do not pay the principal of (or premium, if any, on) a debt security of the series when due; |
| we do not pay interest on a debt security of the series when due, and such default is not cured within 30 days; |
| we do not deposit any sinking fund payment in respect of debt securities of the series within two business days of its due date; |
| we remain in breach of a covenant in respect of debt securities of the series for 60 days after we receive a written notice of default stating we are in breach (the notice must be sent by either the trustee or holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of the series); |
| we file for bankruptcy or certain other events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization occur and remain undischarged or unstayed for a period of 60 days; |
| the series of debt securities has an asset coverage, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act, of less than 100 per centum on the last business day of each of twenty-four consecutive calendar months, after giving effect to any exemptive relief granted to the Company by the SEC; or |
| any other Event of Default in respect of debt securities of the series described in the prospectus supplement occurs. |
An Event of Default for a particular series of debt securities does not necessarily constitute an Event of Default for any other series of debt securities issued under the same or any other indenture. The trustee may withhold notice to the holders of debt securities of any default, except in the payment of principal, premium, interest, or sinking or purchase fund installment, if it in good faith considers the withholding of notice to be in the interest of the holders.
162
Remedies if an Event of Default Occurs
If an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of the affected series may (and the trustee shall at the request of such holders) declare the entire principal amount of all the debt securities of that series to be due and immediately payable. This is called a declaration of acceleration of maturity. A declaration of acceleration of maturity may be canceled by the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of the affected series if (1) we have deposited with the trustee all amounts due and owing with respect to the securities (other than principal that has become due solely by reason of such acceleration) and certain other amounts, and (2) any other Events of Default have been cured or waived.
The trustee is not required to take any action under the indenture at the request of any holders unless the holders offer the trustee protection from expenses and liability reasonably satisfactory to it (called an indemnity). If indemnity reasonably satisfactory to it is provided, the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of the relevant series may direct the time, method and place of conducting any lawsuit or other formal legal action seeking any remedy available to the trustee. The trustee may refuse to follow those directions in certain circumstances. No delay or omission in exercising any right or remedy will be treated as a waiver of that right, remedy or Event of Default.
Before you are allowed to bypass your trustee and bring your own lawsuit or other formal legal action or take other steps to enforce your rights or protect your interests relating to the debt securities, the following must occur:
| you must give the trustee written notice that an Event of Default with respect to the relevant series of debt securities has occurred and remains uncured; |
| the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of all outstanding debt securities of the relevant series must make a written request that the trustee take action because of the default and must offer the trustee indemnity, security or both reasonably satisfactory to it against the costs, expenses and other liabilities of taking that action; |
| the trustee must not have taken action for 60 days after receipt of the above notice and offer of indemnity and/or security; and |
| the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of that series must not have given the trustee a direction inconsistent with the above notice during that 60-day period. |
However, you are entitled at any time to bring a lawsuit for the payment of money due on your debt securities on or after the due date.
Book-entry and other indirect holders should consult their banks or brokers for information on how to give notice or direction to or make a request of the trustee and how to declare or cancel an acceleration of maturity.
Each year, we will furnish to each trustee a written statement of certain of our officers certifying that to their knowledge we are in compliance with the indenture and the debt securities, or else specifying any default.
Waiver of Default
Holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of the affected series may waive any past defaults other than
| the payment of principal, any premium or interest; or |
| in respect of a covenant that cannot be modified or amended without the consent of each holder. |
163
Merger or Consolidation
Under the terms of the indenture, we are generally permitted to consolidate or merge with another corporation. We are also permitted to sell all or substantially all of our assets to another corporation. However, we may not take any of these actions unless all the following conditions are met:
| where we merge out of existence or sell substantially all our assets, the resulting corporation or transferee must agree to be legally responsible for our obligations under the debt securities; |
| the merger or sale of assets must not cause a default on the debt securities and we must not already be in default (unless the merger or sale would cure the default). For purposes of this no-default test, a default would include an Event of Default that has occurred and has not been cured, as described under Events of Default above. A default for this purpose would also include any event that would be an Event of Default if the requirements for giving us a notice of default or our default having to exist for a specific period of time were disregarded; |
| we must deliver certain certificates and documents to the trustee; and |
| we must satisfy any other requirements specified in the prospectus supplement relating to a particular series of debt securities. |
Modification or Waiver
There are three types of changes we can make to the indenture and the debt securities issued thereunder.
Changes Requiring Your Approval
First, there are changes that we cannot make to your debt securities without your specific approval. The following is a list of those types of changes:
| change the stated maturity of the principal of or interest on a debt security or the terms of any sinking fund with respect to any security; |
| reduce any amounts due on a debt security; |
| reduce the amount of principal payable upon acceleration of the maturity of an original issue discount or indexed security following a default or upon the redemption thereof or the amount thereof provable in a bankruptcy proceeding; |
| adversely affect any right of repayment at the holders option; |
| change the place or currency of payment on a debt security (except as otherwise described in the prospectus or prospectus supplement); |
| impair your right to sue for payment; |
| adversely affect any right to convert or exchange a debt security in accordance with its terms; |
| modify the subordination provisions in the indenture in a manner that is adverse to outstanding holders of the debt securities; |
| reduce the percentage of holders of debt securities whose consent is needed to modify or amend the indenture; |
| reduce the percentage of holders of debt securities whose consent is needed to waive compliance with certain provisions of the indenture or to waive certain defaults; |
| modify any other aspect of the provisions of the indenture dealing with supplemental indentures with the consent of holders, waiver of past defaults, changes to the quorum or voting requirements or the waiver of certain covenants; and |
| change any obligation we have to pay additional amounts. |
164
Changes Not Requiring Approval
The second type of change does not require any vote by the holders of the debt securities. This type is limited to clarifications, establishment of the form or terms of new securities of any series as permitted by the indenture and certain other changes that would not adversely affect holders of the outstanding debt securities in any material respect. We also do not need any approval to make any change that affects only debt securities to be issued under the indenture after the change takes effect.
Changes Requiring Majority Approval
Any other change to the indenture and the debt securities would require the following approval:
| if the change affects only one series of debt securities, it must be approved by the holders of a majority in principal amount of that series; and |
| if the change affects more than one series of debt securities issued under the same indenture, it must be approved by the holders of a majority in principal amount of all of the series affected by the change, with all affected series voting together as one class for this purpose. |
In each case, the required approval must be given by written consent.
The holders of a majority in principal amount of a series of debt securities issued under the indenture, voting together as one class for this purpose, may waive our compliance with some of our covenants applicable to that series of debt securities. However, we cannot obtain a waiver of a payment default or of any of the matters covered by the bullet points included above under Changes Requiring Your Approval.
Further Details Concerning Voting
When taking a vote, we will use the following rules to decide how much principal to attribute to a debt security:
| for original issue discount securities, we will use the principal amount that would be due and payable on the voting date if the maturity of these debt securities were accelerated to that date because of a default; |
| for debt securities whose principal amount is not known (for example, because it is based on an index), we will use the principal face amount at original issuance or a special rule for that debt security described in the prospectus supplement; and |
| for debt securities denominated in one or more foreign currencies, we will use the U.S. dollar equivalent. |
Debt securities will not be considered outstanding, and therefore not eligible to vote, if we have deposited or set aside in trust money for their payment or redemption or if we, any other obligor, or any affiliate of us or any obligor own such debt securities. Debt securities will also not be eligible to vote if they have been fully defeased as described later under DefeasanceFull Defeasance.
We will generally be entitled to set any day as a record date for the purpose of determining the holders of outstanding indenture securities that are entitled to vote or take other action under the indenture. However, the record date may not be more than 30 days before the date of the first solicitation of holders to vote on or take such action. If we set a record date for a vote or other action to be taken by holders of one or more series, that vote or action may be taken only by persons who are holders of outstanding indenture securities of those series on the record date and must be taken within eleven months following the record date.
Book-entry and other indirect holders should consult their banks or brokers for information on how approval may be granted or denied if we seek to change the indenture or the debt securities or request a waiver.
165
Defeasance
The following provisions will be applicable to each series of debt securities unless we state in the applicable prospectus supplement that the provisions of covenant defeasance and full defeasance will not be applicable to that series.
Covenant Defeasance
Under current U.S. federal tax law and the indenture, we can make the deposit described below and be released from some of the restrictive covenants in the indenture under which the particular series was issued. This is called covenant defeasance. In that event, you would lose the protection of those restrictive covenants but would gain the protection of having money and government securities set aside in trust to repay your debt securities. If we achieved covenant defeasance and your debt securities were subordinated as described under Indenture ProvisionsSubordination below, such subordination would not prevent the trustee under the indenture from applying the funds available to it from the deposit described in the first bullet below to the payment of amounts due in respect of such debt securities for the benefit of the subordinated debt holders. In order to achieve covenant defeasance, we must do the following:
| we must deposit in trust for the benefit of all holders of a series of debt securities a combination of cash (in such currency in which such securities are then specified as payable at stated maturity) or government obligations applicable to such securities (determined on the basis of the currency in which such securities are then specified as payable at stated maturity) that will generate enough cash to make interest, principal and any other payments on the debt securities on their various due dates and any mandatory sinking fund payments or analogous payments; |
| we must deliver to the trustee a legal opinion of our counsel confirming that, under current U.S. federal income tax law, we may make the above deposit without causing you to be taxed on the debt securities any differently than if we did not make the deposit; |
| we must deliver to the trustee a legal opinion of our counsel stating that the above deposit does not require registration by us under the 1940 Act, as amended, and a legal opinion and officers certificate stating that all conditions precedent to covenant defeasance have been complied with; |
| defeasance must not result in a breach or violation of, or result in a default under, of the indenture or any of our other material agreements or instruments; |
| no default or event of default with respect to such debt securities shall have occurred and be continuing and no defaults or events of default related to bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization shall occur during the next 90 days; and |
| satisfy the conditions for covenant defeasance contained in any supplemental indentures. |
If we accomplish covenant defeasance, you can still look to us for repayment of the debt securities if there were a shortfall in the trust deposit or the trustee is prevented from making payment. For example, if one of the remaining Events of Default occurred (such as our bankruptcy) and the debt securities became immediately due and payable, there might be such a shortfall. However, there is no assurance that we would have sufficient funds to make payment of the shortfall.
Full Defeasance
If there is a change in U.S. federal tax law or we obtain an IRS ruling, as described in the second bullet below, we can legally release ourselves from all payment and other obligations on the debt securities of a particular series (called full defeasance) if we put in place the following other arrangements for you to be repaid:
| we must deposit in trust for the benefit of all holders of a series of debt securities a combination of cash (in such currency in which such securities are then specified as payable at stated maturity) or |
166
government obligations applicable to such securities (determined on the basis of the currency in which such securities are then specified as payable at stated maturity) that will generate enough cash to make interest, principal and any other payments on the debt securities on their various due dates and any mandatory sinking fund payments or analogous payments; |
| we must deliver to the trustee a legal opinion confirming that there has been a change in current U.S. federal tax law or an IRS ruling that allows us to make the above deposit without causing you to be taxed on the debt securities any differently than if we did not make the deposit. Under current U.S. federal tax law, the deposit and our legal release from the debt securities would be treated as though we paid you your share of the cash and notes or bonds at the time the cash and notes or bonds were deposited in trust in exchange for your debt securities and you would recognize gain or loss on the debt securities at the time of the deposit; |
| we must deliver to the trustee a legal opinion of our counsel stating that the above deposit does not require registration by us under the 1940 Act, as amended, and a legal opinion and officers certificate stating that all conditions precedent to defeasance have been complied with; |
| defeasance must not result in a breach or violation of, or constitute a default under, of the indenture or any of our other material agreements or instruments; |
| no default or event of default with respect to such debt securities shall have occurred and be continuing and no defaults or events of default related to bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization shall occur during the next 90 days; and |
| satisfy the conditions for full defeasance contained in any supplemental indentures. |
If we ever did accomplish full defeasance, as described above, you would have to rely solely on the trust deposit for repayment of the debt securities. You could not look to us for repayment in the unlikely event of any shortfall. Conversely, the trust deposit would most likely be protected from claims of our lenders and other creditors if we ever became bankrupt or insolvent. If your debt securities were subordinated as described later under Indenture ProvisionsSubordination, such subordination would not prevent the trustee under the indenture from applying the funds available to it from the deposit referred to in the first bullet of the preceding paragraph to the payment of amounts due in respect of such debt securities for the benefit of the subordinated debt holders.
Form, Exchange and Transfer of Certificated Registered Securities
If registered debt securities cease to be issued in book-entry form, they will be issued:
| only in fully registered certificated form; |
| without interest coupons; and |
| unless we indicate otherwise in the prospectus supplement, in denominations of $1,000 and amounts that are multiples of $1,000. |
Holders may exchange their certificated securities for debt securities of smaller denominations or combined into fewer debt securities of larger denominations, as long as the total principal amount is not changed and as long as the denomination is greater than the minimum denomination for such securities.
Holders may exchange or transfer their certificated securities at the office of the trustee. We have appointed the trustee to act as our agent for registering debt securities in the names of holders transferring debt securities. We may appoint another entity to perform these functions or perform them ourselves.
Holders will not be required to pay a service charge to transfer or exchange their certificated securities, but they may be required to pay any tax or other governmental charge associated with the transfer or exchange. The transfer or exchange will be made only if our transfer agent is satisfied with the holders proof of legal ownership.
167
If we have designated additional transfer agents for your debt security, they will be named in the prospectus supplement. We may appoint additional transfer agents or cancel the appointment of any particular transfer agent. We may also approve a change in the office through which any transfer agent acts.
If any certificated securities of a particular series are redeemable and we redeem less than all the debt securities of that series, we may block the transfer or exchange of those debt securities during the period beginning 15 days before the day we mail the notice of redemption and ending on the day of that mailing, in order to freeze the list of holders to prepare the mailing. We may also refuse to register transfers or exchanges of any certificated securities selected for redemption, except that we will continue to permit transfers and exchanges of the unredeemed portion of any debt security that will be partially redeemed.
If a registered debt security is issued in book-entry form, only the depositary will be entitled to transfer and exchange the debt security as described in this subsection, since it will be the sole holder of the debt security.
Resignation of Trustee
Each trustee may resign or be removed with respect to one or more series of indenture securities provided that a successor trustee is appointed to act with respect to these series and has accepted such appointment. In the event that two or more persons are acting as trustee with respect to different series of indenture securities under the indenture, each of the trustees will be a trustee of a trust separate and apart from the trust administered by any other trustee.
Indenture ProvisionsSubordination
Upon any distribution of our assets upon our dissolution, winding up, liquidation or reorganization, the payment of the principal of (and premium, if any) and interest, if any, on any indenture securities denominated as subordinated debt securities is to be subordinated to the extent provided in the indenture in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all Senior Indebtedness (as defined below), but our obligation to you to make payment of the principal of (and premium, if any) and interest, if any, on such subordinated debt securities will not otherwise be affected. In addition, no payment on account of principal (or premium, if any), sinking fund or interest, if any, may be made on such subordinated debt securities at any time unless full payment of all amounts due in respect of the principal (and premium, if any), sinking fund and interest on Senior Indebtedness has been made or duly provided for in money or moneys worth.
In the event that, notwithstanding the foregoing, any payment by us is received by the trustee in respect of subordinated debt securities or by the holders of any of such subordinated debt securities, upon our dissolution, winding up, liquidation or reorganization before all Senior Indebtedness is paid in full, the payment or distribution received by the trustee in respect of such subordinated debt securities or by the holders of any of such subordinated debt securities must be paid over to the holders of the Senior Indebtedness or on their behalf for application to the payment of all the Senior Indebtedness remaining unpaid until all the Senior Indebtedness has been paid in full, after giving effect to any concurrent payment or distribution to the holders of the Senior Indebtedness. Subject to the payment in full of all Senior Indebtedness upon this distribution by us, the holders of such subordinated debt securities will be subrogated to the rights of the holders of the Senior Indebtedness to the extent of payments made to the holders of the Senior Indebtedness out of the distributive share of such subordinated debt securities.
By reason of this subordination, in the event of a distribution of our assets upon our insolvency, certain of our senior creditors may recover more, ratably, than holders of any subordinated debt securities or the holders of any indenture securities that are not Senior Indebtedness. The indenture provides that these subordination provisions will not apply to money and securities held in trust under the defeasance provisions of the indenture.
168
Senior Indebtedness is defined in the indenture as the principal of (and premium, if any) and unpaid interest on:
| our indebtedness (including indebtedness of others guaranteed by us), whenever created, incurred, assumed or guaranteed, for money borrowed, that we have designated as Senior Indebtedness for purposes of the indenture and in accordance with the terms of the indenture (including any indenture securities designated as Senior Indebtedness), and |
| renewals, extensions, modifications and refinancings of any of this indebtedness. |
If this prospectus is being delivered in connection with the offering of a series of indenture securities denominated as subordinated debt securities, the accompanying prospectus supplement will set forth the approximate amount of our Senior Indebtedness and of our other Indebtedness outstanding as of a recent date.
Secured Indebtedness and Ranking
Certain of our indebtedness, including certain series of indenture securities, may be secured. The prospectus supplement for each series of indenture securities will describe the terms of any security interest for such series and will indicate the approximate amount of our secured indebtedness as of a recent date. Any unsecured indenture securities will effectively rank junior to any secured indebtedness, including any secured indenture securities, that we incur in the future to the extent of the value of the assets securing such future secured indebtedness. The debt securities, whether secured or unsecured, of the Company will rank structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by our subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities (i.e., the holders of the debt securities will not have access to the assets of the Companys subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities until after all of these entities creditors have been paid and the remaining assets have been distributed up to the Company as the equity holder of these entities). In this regard, any notes that we may issue will be strictly the obligation of the Company, and not of Saratoga CLO, or any subsidiary we may form in the future.
In the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation, reorganization or other winding up, any of our assets that secure secured debt will be available to pay obligations on unsecured debt securities only after all indebtedness under such secured debt has been repaid in full from such assets. We advise you that there may not be sufficient assets remaining to pay amounts due on any or all unsecured debt securities then outstanding after fulfillment of this obligation. As a result, the holders of unsecured indenture securities may recover less, ratably, than holders of any of our secured indebtedness.
The Trustee under the Indenture
U.S. Bank National Association serves as the trustee under the indenture.
Certain Considerations Relating to Foreign Currencies
Debt securities denominated or payable in foreign currencies may entail significant risks. These risks include the possibility of significant fluctuations in the foreign currency markets, the imposition or modification of foreign exchange controls and potential illiquidity in the secondary market. These risks will vary depending upon the currency or currencies involved and will be more fully described in the applicable prospectus supplement.
169
The following is a general description of the terms of the warrants we may issue from time to time. Particular terms of any warrants we offer will be described in the prospectus supplement relating to such warrants and will be subject to compliance with the 1940 Act.
As described further below, subject to receiving shareholder approval to issue warrants at a future annual meeting of stockholders, we may issue warrants to purchase shares of our common stock or debt securities. Such warrants may be issued independently or together with shares of common stock or debt securities and may be attached or separate from such securities. We will issue each series of warrants under a separate warrant agreement to be entered into between us and a warrant agent. The warrant agent will act solely as our agent and will not assume any obligation or relationship of agency for or with holders or beneficial owners of warrants.
A prospectus supplement will describe the particular terms of any series of warrants we may issue, including the following:
| the title and aggregate number of such warrants; |
| the price or prices at which such warrants will be issued; |
| the currency or currencies, including composite currencies, in which the price of such warrants may be payable; |
| if applicable, the designation and terms of the securities with which the warrants are issued and the number of warrants issued with each such security or each principal amount of such security; |
| in the case of warrants to purchase debt securities, the principal amount of debt securities purchasable upon exercise of one warrant and the price at which and the currency or currencies, including composite currencies, in which this principal amount of debt securities may be purchased upon such exercise; |
| in the case of warrants to purchase common stock, the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise of one warrant and the price at which and the currency or currencies, including composite currencies, in which these shares may be purchased upon such exercise; |
| the date on which the right to exercise such warrants shall commence and the date on which such right will expire (subject to any extension); |
| whether such warrants will be issued in registered form or bearer form; |
| if applicable, the minimum or maximum amount of such warrants that may be exercised at any one time; |
| if applicable, the date on and after which such warrants and the related securities will be separately transferable; |
| the terms of any rights to redeem, or call such warrants; |
| information with respect to book-entry procedures, if any; |
| the terms of the securities issuable upon exercise of the warrants; |
| if applicable, a discussion of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations; and |
| any other terms of such warrants, including terms, procedures and limitations relating to the exchange and exercise of such warrants. |
We and the warrant agent may amend or supplement the warrant agreement for a series of warrants without the consent of the holders of the warrants issued thereunder to effect changes that are not inconsistent with the provisions of the warrants and that do not materially and adversely affect the interests of the holders of the warrants.
170
Each warrant will entitle the holder to purchase for cash such common stock at the exercise price or such principal amount of debt securities as shall in each case be set forth in, or be determinable as set forth in, the prospectus supplement relating to the warrants offered thereby. Warrants may be exercised as set forth in the prospectus supplement beginning on the date specified therein and continuing until the close of business on the expiration date set forth in the prospectus supplement. After the close of business on the expiration date, unexercised warrants will become void.
Upon receipt of payment and a warrant certificate properly completed and duly executed at the corporate trust office of the warrant agent or any other office indicated in the prospectus supplement, we will, as soon as practicable, forward the securities purchasable upon such exercise. If less than all of the warrants represented by such warrant certificate are exercised, a new warrant certificate will be issued for the remaining warrants. If we so indicate in the applicable prospectus supplement, holders of the warrants may surrender securities as all or part of the exercise price for warrants.
Prior to exercising their warrants, holders of warrants will not have any of the rights of holders of the securities purchasable upon such exercise, including, in the case of warrants to purchase debt securities, the right to receive principal, premium, if any, or interest payments, on the debt securities purchasable upon exercise or to enforce covenants in the applicable indenture or, in the case of warrants to purchase common stock, the right to receive dividends or other distributions, if any, or payments upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up or to exercise any voting rights.
Under the 1940 Act, we may generally only offer warrants provided that (i) the warrants expire by their terms within ten years, (ii) the exercise or conversion price is not less than the current market value at the date of issuance, (iii) our stockholders authorize the proposal to issue such warrants, and our board of directors approves such issuance on the basis that the issuance is in the best interests of us and our stockholders and (iv) if the warrants are accompanied by other securities, the warrants are not separately transferable unless no class of such warrants and the securities accompanying them has been publicly distributed. The 1940 Act also provides that the amount of our voting securities that would result from the exercise of all outstanding warrants, as well as options and rights, at the time of issuance may not exceed 25% of our outstanding voting securities.
We may in the future seek the approval of our stockholders to approve a proposal to authorize us to issue securities to subscribe to, convert to, or purchase shares of our common stock in one or more offerings. Such authorization will have no expiration. If we do not receive such stockholder approval, we will not issue any warrants.
171
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, up to $70,000,000 of our common stock, debt securities or warrants to purchase common stock or debt securities, in one or more underwritten public offerings, at-the-market offerings, negotiated transactions, block trades, best efforts offerings or a combination of these methods. We may sell the securities through underwriters or dealers, directly to one or more purchasers through agents or through a combination of any such methods of sale. Any underwriter or agent involved in the offer and sale of the securities will be named in the applicable prospectus supplement. A prospectus supplement or supplements will also describe the terms of the offering of the securities, including: the purchase price of the securities and the proceeds we will receive from the sale; any over-allotment options under which underwriters may purchase additional securities from us; any agency fees or underwriting discounts and other items constituting agents or underwriters compensation; the public offering price; any discounts or concessions allowed or re-allowed or paid to dealers; and any securities exchange or market on which the securities may be listed. Only underwriters named in the prospectus supplement will be underwriters of the securities offered by the prospectus supplement.
The distribution of our securities may be effected from time to time in one or more transactions at a fixed price or prices, which may be changed, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices, or at negotiated prices, provided, however, that the offering price per share of our common stock, less any underwriting commissions and discounts or agency fees paid by us, must generally equal or exceed the net asset value per share of our common stock. We may under certain circumstances consider selling our securities at prices below our net asset value per share consistent with the terms of our stockholder approval to sell our shares of common stock at a price below our net asset value per share. Any offering of shares of our common stock at a price below our then current net asset value per share that requires shareholder approval must occur, if at all, within one year after receiving such shareholder approval. We do not currently have stockholder approval of issuances below net asset value.
In connection with the sale of our securities, underwriters or agents may receive compensation from us or from purchasers of our securities, for whom they may act as agents, in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions. Our common stockholders will bear, directly or indirectly, such expenses, as well as any other fees and the expenses incurred by us in connection with any offering of our securities, including debt securities.
Underwriters may sell our securities to or through dealers and such dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the underwriters and/or commissions from the purchasers for whom they may act as agents. Underwriters, dealers and agents that participate in the distribution of our securities may be deemed to be underwriters under the Securities Act, and any discounts and commissions they receive from us and any profit realized by them on the resale of our securities may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act. Any such underwriter or agent will be identified and any such compensation received from us will be described in the applicable prospectus supplement.
We may enter into derivative transactions with third parties, or sell securities not covered by this prospectus to third parties in privately negotiated transactions. If the applicable prospectus supplement indicates, in connection with those derivatives, the third parties may sell securities covered by this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement, including in short sale transactions. If so, the third party may use securities pledged by us or borrowed from us or others to settle those sales or to close out any related open borrowings of stock, and may use securities received from us in settlement of those derivatives to close out any related open borrowings of stock. The third parties in such sale transactions will be underwriters and, if not identified in this prospectus, will be identified in the applicable prospectus supplement (or a post-effective amendment).
Any underwriter may engage in over-allotment, stabilizing transactions, short-covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act. Over-allotment involves sales in excess of the offering size, which create a short position. Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum price. Syndicate-covering or other
172
short-covering transactions involve purchases of the securities, either through exercise of the over-allotment option or in the open market after the distribution is completed, to cover short positions. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a dealer when the securities originally sold by the dealer are purchased in a stabilizing or covering transaction to cover short positions. Those activities may cause the price of the securities to be higher than it would otherwise be. If commenced, the underwriters may discontinue any of the activities at any time.
Any underwriters that are qualified market makers on the NYSE may engage in passive market making transactions in our common stock on the NYSE in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act, during the business day prior to the pricing of the offering, before the commencement of offers or sales of our common stock. Passive market makers must comply with applicable volume and price limitations and must be identified as passive market makers. In general, a passive market maker must display its bid at a price not in excess of the highest independent bid for such security; if all independent bids are lowered below the passive market makers bid, however, the passive market makers bid must then be lowered when certain purchase limits are exceeded. Passive market making may stabilize the market price of the securities at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
We may sell securities directly or through agents we designate from time to time. We will name any agent involved in the offering and sale of securities and we will describe any commissions we will pay the agent in the prospectus supplement. Unless the prospectus supplement states otherwise, our agent will act on a best-efforts basis for the period of its appointment.
Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, each class or series of securities will be a new issue with no trading market, other than our common stock, which is traded on the NYSE. We may elect to list any other class or series of securities on any exchanges, but we are not obligated to do so. We cannot guarantee the liquidity of the trading markets for any securities.
Under agreements into which we may enter, underwriters, dealers and agents who participate in the distribution of our securities may be entitled to indemnification by us against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Underwriters, dealers and agents may engage in transactions with, or perform services for, us in the ordinary course of business.
If so indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, we will authorize underwriters or other persons acting as our agents to solicit offers by certain institutions to purchase our securities from us pursuant to contracts providing for payment and delivery on a future date. Institutions with which such contracts may be made include commercial and savings banks, insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies, educational and charitable institutions and others, but in all cases such institutions must be approved by us. The obligations of any purchaser under any such contract will be subject to the condition that the purchase of our securities shall not at the time of delivery be prohibited under the laws of the jurisdiction to which such purchaser is subject. The underwriters and such other agents will not have any responsibility in respect of the validity or performance of such contracts. Such contracts will be subject only to those conditions set forth in the prospectus supplement, and the prospectus supplement will set forth the commission payable for solicitation of such contracts.
In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states, if applicable, our securities offered hereby will be sold in such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in certain states, our securities may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.
The maximum commission or discount to be received by any member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. will not be greater than 10% for the sale of any securities being registered.
173
BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since we generally acquire and dispose of our investments in privately negotiated transactions, we infrequently use brokers in the normal course of our business. Subject to policies established by our Board of Directors, we generally do not execute transactions through any particular broker or dealer, but seek to obtain the best net results for us, taking into account such factors as price (including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of execution, operational facilities of the firm and the firms risk and skill in positioning blocks of securities. While we generally seek reasonably competitive trade execution costs, we do not necessarily pay the lowest spread or commission available. Subject to applicable legal requirements, we may select a broker based partly upon brokerage or research services provided to us. In return for such services, we may pay a higher commission than other brokers would charge if we determine in good faith that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services provided, and our management and employees are authorized to pay such commission under these circumstances.
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AND DIVIDEND PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Our investment securities are held under a custody agreement with U.S. Bank National Association. The address of the custodian is U.S. Bank National Association, Corporate Trust Services, One Federal Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02110. The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, acts as our transfer agent, dividend paying and reinvestment agent for our common stock. The principal business address of the transfer agent is 59 Maiden Lane, New York, New York 10038. U.S. Bank National Association, our trustee under an indenture and the second supplemental indenture thereto relating to the 2023 Notes, is the paying agent, registrar and transfer agent relating to the 2023 Notes. The principal business address of our trustee is 214 N. Tyron Street, 12th Floor, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202.
Certain legal matters regarding the securities offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for us by Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, Washington, D.C.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our consolidated financial statements as of February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 and the three years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015, and February 28, 2014 and the related senior securities table, as set forth in their reports. We have included our consolidated financial statements and our senior securities table in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement in reliance on Ernst & Young LLPs report, given on their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. Ernst & Young LLPs principal business address is 5 Times Square, New York, New York 10036.
As a public company, we file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current periodic reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information, as well as the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part and the related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of these reports, proxy and information
174
statements and other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public Reference Section, Washington, D.C. 20549-0102. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by us with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
We are committed to protecting your privacy. This privacy notice explains the privacy policies of Saratoga Investment Corp. and its affiliated companies. This notice supersedes any other privacy notice you may have received from Saratoga Investment Corp.
We will safeguard, according to strict standards of security and confidentiality, all information we receive about you. The only information we collect from you is your name, address, number of shares you hold and your social security number. This information is used only so that we can send you annual reports and other information about us, and send you proxy statements or other information required by law.
We do not share this information with any non-affiliated third party except as described below:
| Authorized Employees of Our Investment Adviser. It is our policy that only authorized employees of our investment adviser who need to know your personal information will have access to it. |
| Service Providers. We may disclose your personal information to companies that provide services on our behalf, such as recordkeeping, processing your trades, and mailing you information. These companies are required to protect your information and use it solely for the purpose for which they received it. |
| Courts and Government Officials. If required by law, we may disclose your personal information in accordance with a court order or at the request of government regulators. Only that information required by law, subpoena, or court order will be disclosed. |
175
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of November 30, 2016 (unaudited) and February 29, 2016 |
F-4 | |||
F-12 | ||||
F-13 |
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements |
||||
F-57 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 |
F-58 | |||
F-59 | ||||
Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 |
F-60 | |||
F-68 | ||||
F-69 | ||||
F-70 |
F-1
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities
As of | ||||||||
November 30, 2016 | February 29, 2016 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments at fair value |
||||||||
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (amortized cost of $270,029,200 and $268,145,090, respectively) |
$ | 262,303,777 | $ | 271,168,186 | ||||
Control investments (cost of $15,448,369 and $13,030,751, respectively) |
15,265,995 | 12,827,980 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total investments at fair value (amortized cost of $285,477,569 and $281,175,841, respectively) |
277,569,772 | 283,996,166 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
5,770,230 | 2,440,277 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
17,521,282 | 4,594,506 | ||||||
Interest receivable (net of reserve of $0 and $728,519, respectively) |
3,984,752 | 3,195,919 | ||||||
Due from affiliate |
46,078 | | ||||||
Management fee receivable |
170,975 | 170,016 | ||||||
Other assets |
184,761 | 350,368 | ||||||
Receivable from unsettled trades |
284,903 | 300,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 305,532,753 | $ | 295,047,252 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Deferred debt financing costs, revolving credit facility |
(456,594 | ) | (515,906 | ) | ||||
SBA debentures payable |
112,660,000 | 103,660,000 | ||||||
Deferred debt financing costs, SBA debentures payable |
(2,622,206 | ) | (2,493,303 | ) | ||||
Notes payable |
61,793,125 | 61,793,125 | ||||||
Deferred debt financing costs, notes payable |
(1,553,545 | ) | (1,694,586 | ) | ||||
Dividend payable |
| 875,599 | ||||||
Base management and incentive fees payable |
5,932,447 | 5,593,956 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
672,791 | 855,873 | ||||||
Interest and debt fees payable |
1,098,309 | 1,552,069 | ||||||
Payable for repurchases of common stock |
| 20,957 | ||||||
Directors fees payable |
51,000 | 31,500 | ||||||
Due to manager |
277,696 | 218,093 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 177,853,023 | $ | 169,897,377 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 7) |
||||||||
NET ASSETS |
||||||||
Common stock, par value $.001, 100,000,000 common shares authorized, 5,748,247 and 5,672,227 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
$ | 5,748 | $ | 5,672 | ||||
Capital in excess of par value |
189,583,336 | 188,714,329 | ||||||
Distribution in excess of net investment income |
(26,128,907 | ) | (26,217,902 | ) | ||||
Accumulated net realized loss from investments and derivatives |
(27,872,650 | ) | (40,172,549 | ) | ||||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and derivatives |
(7,907,797 | ) | 2,820,325 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total net assets |
127,679,730 | 125,149,875 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and net assets |
$ | 305,532,753 | $ | 295,047,252 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE |
$ | 22.21 | $ | 22.06 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
For the three months ended November 30 |
For the nine months ended November 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
||||||||||||||||
Interest from investments |
||||||||||||||||
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments |
$ | 6,787,898 | $ | 5,435,083 | $ | 19,969,849 | $ | 16,961,744 | ||||||||
Payment-in-kind interest income from Non-control/Non-affiliate investments |
169,332 | 41,322 | 482,687 | 995,465 | ||||||||||||
Control investments |
498,599 | 750,605 | 1,587,925 | 2,020,301 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total interest income |
7,455,829 | 6,227,010 | 22,040,461 | 19,977,510 | ||||||||||||
Interest from cash and cash equivalents |
6,239 | 1,307 | 16,426 | 2,774 | ||||||||||||
Management fee income |
375,218 | 369,388 | 1,123,559 | 1,121,286 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
605,009 | 338,219 | 1,618,238 | 1,153,838 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total investment income |
8,442,295 | 6,935,924 | 24,798,684 | 22,255,408 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and debt financing expenses |
2,369,108 | 2,129,105 | 7,106,869 | 6,240,946 | ||||||||||||
Base management fees |
1,219,916 | 1,091,405 | 3,649,867 | 3,366,739 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees |
330,197 | 347,639 | 991,723 | 1,030,616 | ||||||||||||
Administrator expenses |
341,667 | 325,000 | 991,667 | 850,000 | ||||||||||||
Incentive management fees |
394,509 | 404,218 | 2,331,241 | 2,160,772 | ||||||||||||
Insurance |
68,985 | 85,262 | 210,301 | 259,895 | ||||||||||||
Directors fees and expenses |
66,000 | 51,000 | 192,422 | 153,000 | ||||||||||||
General & administrative |
224,579 | 351,875 | 741,743 | 738,244 | ||||||||||||
Excise tax expense (credit) |
| | | (123,338 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expense |
8,460 | | 21,647 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total expenses |
5,023,421 | 4,785,504 | 16,237,480 | 14,676,874 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INVESTMENT INCOME |
3,418,874 | 2,150,420 | 8,561,204 | 7,578,534 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS: |
||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain from investments |
260,244 | 447,813 | 12,299,899 | 4,231,006 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(2,105,342 | ) | 823,093 | (10,728,122 | ) | 239,354 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net gain (loss) on investments |
(1,845,098 | ) | 1,270,906 | 1,571,777 | 4,470,360 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | 1,573,776 | $ | 3,421,326 | $ | 10,132,981 | $ | 12,048,894 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGEBASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 1.77 | $ | 2.18 | ||||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDINGBASIC AND DILUTED |
5,727,933 | 5,632,011 | 5,735,443 | 5,533,094 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
November 30, 2016
(unaudited)
Company |
Industry | Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) |
% of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Non-control/Non-affiliated investments205.4%(b) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
CAMP International Systems(d) |
Aerospace and Defense |
|
Second Lien Term Loan (L+7.25%), 8.25% Cash, 8/18/2024 |
|
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | 995,171 | $ | 1,020,000 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Aerospace and Defense | 995,171 | 1,020,000 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Polar Holding Company, Ltd.(a),(d),(i) |
Building Products |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+9.00%), 10.00% Cash, 9/30/2016 |
|
$ | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Building Products | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Apex Holdings Software Technologies, LLC |
Business Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+8.00%), 9.00% Cash, 9/21/2021 |
|
$ | 18,000,000 | 17,848,031 | 17,842,500 | 14.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC(g) |
Business Services |
Common Stock | 100,000 | 100,000 | 251,000 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC |
Business Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+8.25%), 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 |
|
$ | 2,279,278 | 2,257,229 | 2,279,278 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC(j),(k) |
Business Services |
|
Delayed Draw Term Loan A (L+8.25%), 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 |
|
$ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
BMC Software, Inc.(d) |
Business Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+4.00%), 5.00% Cash, 9/10/2020 |
|
$ | 5,626,667 | 5,594,987 | 5,493,315 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Courion Corporation |
Business Services |
|
Second Lien Term Loan (L+10.00%), 11.00% Cash, 6/1/2021 |
|
$ | 15,000,000 | 14,872,231 | 13,932,000 | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Dispensing Dynamics International(d) |
Business Services |
|
Senior Secured Note 12.50% Cash, 1/1/2018 |
|
$ | 12,000,000 | 12,015,235 | 11,640,000 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Easy Ice, LLC(d) |
Business Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+8.75%), 9.50% Cash, 1/15/2020 |
|
$ | 16,000,000 | 15,876,901 | 16,080,000 | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, L.L.C. |
Business Services |
|
Senior Secured Note (L+8.50%), 10.00% Cash, 1/23/2020 |
|
$ | 3,300,000 | 3,277,195 | 3,318,810 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, |
Business Services |
|
Warrant Membership Interests, Expires 12/28/2022 |
|
49,318 | 400,000 | 476,541 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Erwin, Inc. |
Business Services |
|
Second Lien Term Loan (L+11.50%), 13.50% (11.50% Cash/1.00% PIK), 8/28/2021 |
|
$ | 13,077,419 | 12,957,650 | 13,077,419 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||
GreyHeller LLC |
Business Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+11.00%), 12.00% Cash, 11/16/2021 |
|
$ | 7,000,000 | 6,930,320 | 6,930,000 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
GreyHeller LLC(j),(k) |
Business Services |
|
Delayed Draw Term Loan B (L+11.00%), 12.00% Cash, 11/16/2021 |
|
$ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
GreyHeller LLC(g) |
Business Services |
Common Stock | 850,000 | 850,000 | 850,000 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.(Help/Systems, LLC) |
Business Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+5.25%), 6.25% Cash, 10/8/2021 |
|
$ | 4,962,500 | 4,878,301 | 4,921,311 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.(Help/Systems, LLC) |
Business Services |
|
Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.50%), 10.50% Cash, 10/8/2022 |
|
$ | 3,000,000 | 2,919,579 | 2,820,000 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems |
Business Services |
|
Convertible Promissory Note 13.50% (6.75% Cash/6.75% PIK), 8/18/2018 |
|
611,517 | 611,521 | 611,521 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems(g) |
Business Services |
Common Stock Class A Units | 232,616 | 232,616 | 549,258 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems |
Business Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+9.25%), 12.00% (9.25% Cash/1.75% PIK) 12/18/2020 |
|
$ | 10,248,887 | 10,172,877 | 10,248,887 | 8.0 | % |
F-4
Company |
Industry | Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) |
% of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Knowland Technology Holdings, L.L.C. |
Business Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+8.75%), 9.75% Cash, 11/29/2017 |
|
$ | 17,777,730 | 17,664,387 | 17,777,730 | 13.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Microsystems Company |
Business Services |
|
Second Lien Term Loan (L+10.00%), 11.00% Cash, 7/1/2022 |
|
$ | 8,000,000 | 7,924,524 | 7,920,000 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., LLC(d) |
Business Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan, 14.00% (12.00% Cash/2.00% PIK), 3/6/2018 |
|
$ | 8,877,910 | 8,826,316 | 8,877,910 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., LLC(d),(g) |
Business Services |
|
Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests, Expires 5/31/2025 |
|
343 | | 352,260 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Business Services | 146,209,900 | 146,249,740 | 114.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d),(g) |
Consumer Products |
Common Stock | 210,456 | 1,791,242 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Products |
|
Second Lien Term Loan A-2 15.00% PIK, 12/31/2019 |
|
$ | 228,909 | 228,909 | 228,909 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Products |
|
Second Lien Term Loan B 15.00% PIK, 12/31/2019 |
|
$ | 686,726 | 686,726 | 558,171 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Products | 2,706,877 | 787,080 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
My Alarm Center, LLC |
Consumer Services |
|
Second Lien Term Loan (L+11.00%), 12.00% Cash, 7/9/2019 |
|
$ | 9,375,000 | 9,357,973 | 9,345,938 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+5.25%), 6.50% Cash, 7/1/2019 |
|
$ | 1,488,754 | 1,483,515 | 1,487,266 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Services |
|
Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.25%), 10.25% Cash, 7/1/2020 |
|
$ | 10,000,000 | 9,968,634 | 9,904,000 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Services | 20,810,122 | 20,737,204 | 16.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., L.L.C.(d),(g) |
Education | Class A Common Stock | 544,761 | 30,241 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., |
Education | |
First Lien Term Loan 1.00% Cash, 3/31/2018 |
|
$ | 2,321,073 | 1,193,790 | 8,087 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Teachers of Tomorrow, |
Education | Common Stock | 750 | 750,000 | 910,545 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Teachers of Tomorrow, LLC |
Education | |
Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.75%), 10.75% Cash, 6/2/2021 |
|
$ | 10,000,000 | 9,914,485 | 10,000,000 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Education | 11,888,516 | 10,918,632 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
TM Restaurant Group L.L.C. |
Food and Beverage |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+8.50%), 9.75% Cash, 7/16/2017 |
|
$ | 9,358,694 | 9,313,879 | 8,422,825 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Food and Beverage | 9,313,879 | 8,422,825 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, Inc. |
Healthcare Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan B (L+10.00%), 11.00% Cash, 7/24/2019 |
|
$ | 11,250,000 | 11,114,850 | 10,871,661 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, Inc.(g),(h) |
Healthcare Services |
Limited Partner Interests | 999 | 999,000 | 725,936 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, Inc.(d),(g) |
Healthcare Services |
Common Stock | 5,081 | 508,077 | 678,931 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, Inc. |
Healthcare Services |
|
Second Lien Term Loan 11.25% Cash, 9/26/2019 |
|
$ | 4,200,000 | 4,151,963 | 4,154,220 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Ohio Medical, LLC(g) |
Healthcare Services |
Common Stock | 5,000 | 500,000 | 329,096 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ohio Medical, LLC |
Healthcare Services |
|
Senior Subordinated Note 12.00%, 7/15/2021 |
|
$ | 7,300,000 | 7,235,173 | 7,234,300 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Zest Holdings, LLC(d) |
Healthcare Services |
|
First Lien Term Loan (L+4.75%), 5.75% Cash, 8/16/2020 |
|
$ | 4,136,911 | 4,081,904 | 4,134,015 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Healthcare Services | 28,590,967 | 28,128,159 | 22.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | |
First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 5/16/2019 |
|
$ | 8,581,357 | 8,485,902 | 8,581,357 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | |
Delayed Draw First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 5/16/2019 |
|
$ | 4,800,000 | 4,748,026 | 4,800,000 | 3.7 | % |
F-5
Company |
Industry | Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) |
% of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | |
Class A Series, Expires 1/16/2025 |
|
4,264 | 61,647 | 282,106 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | |
Class A Warrant, Expires 1/16/2025 |
|
30,320 | 438,353 | 1,616,966 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | |
Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests (Common), Expires 5/16/2024 |
|
57,872 | | 2,791,745 | 2.2 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | |
Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests (Preferred), Expires 5/16/2024 |
|
8,139 | | 449,761 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Media | 13,733,928 | 18,521,935 | 14.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C.(d),(g) |
Metals | Common Stock | 35,000 | 9,217,564 | 357,350 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C.(d) |
Metals | |
Revolver (L+8.50%), 10.00% Cash, 3/31/2017 |
|
$ | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Metals | 17,717,564 | 8,857,350 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Mercury Network, LLC |
Real Estate |
|
First Lien Term Loan 10.5% Cash, 8/24/2021 |
|
$ | 15,791,286 | 15,649,233 | 15,871,821 | 12.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Mercury Network, LLC(g) |
Real Estate |
Common Stock | 413,043 | 413,043 | 789,031 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Real Estate | 16,062,276 | 16,660,852 | 13.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Sub Total Non-control/Non-affiliated investments |
|
270,029,200 | 262,303,777 | 205.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Control investments12.0%(b) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.(a),(d),(e),(f) |
Structured Finance Securities |
|
Other/Structured Finance Securities 13.26%, 10/17/2025 |
|
$ | 30,000,000 | 10,948,369 | 10,986,945 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. Class F |
Structured Finance Securities |
|
Other/Structured Finance Securities (L+8.50%), 9.22%, 10/20/2025 |
|
$ | 4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | 4,279,050 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Sub Total Control investments |
15,448,369 | 15,265,995 | 12.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS217.4%(b) |
$ | 285,477,569 | $ | 277,569,772 | 217.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Principal | Cost | Fair Value | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts18.2% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Bank Money Market(l) |
|
$ | 23,291,512 | $ | 23,291,512 | $ | 23,291,512 | 18.2 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
|
$ | 23,291,512 | $ | 23,291,512 | $ | 23,291,512 | 18.2 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Represents a non-qualifying investment as defined under Section 55 (a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Non-qualifying assets represent 6.2% of the Companys portfolio at fair value. As a BDC, the Company can only invest 30% of its portfolio in non-qualifying assets. |
(b) | Percentages are based on net assets of $127,679,730 as of November 30, 2016. |
(c) | Because there is no readily available market value for these investments, the fair value of these investments is approved in good faith by our board of directors (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(d) | These securities are pledged as collateral under a senior secured revolving credit facility (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(e) | This investment does not have a stated interest rate that is payable thereon. As a result, the 13.26% interest rate in the table above represents the effective interest rate currently earned on the investment cost and is based on the current cash interest and other income generated by the investment. |
F-6
(f) | As defined in the Investment Company Act, we Control this portfolio company because we own more than 25% of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the period in which the issuer was both an Affiliate and a portfolio company that we Control are as follows: |
Sales (Cost) |
Interest Income |
Management Fee Income |
Net Realized Gains/(Losses) |
Net Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
Purchases | Redemptions | Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,569,492 | $ | 1,123,559 | $ | | $ | 241,347 | ||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. Class F Note |
$ | 4,500,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 18,433 | $ | | $ | | $ | (220,950 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) | Non-income producing at November 30, 2016. |
(h) | Includes securities issued by an affiliate of the Company. |
(i) | Non-U.S. company. The principal place of business for Polar Holding Company, Ltd. is Canada. |
(j) | The investment has an unfunded commitment as of November 30, 2016 (see Note 7). |
(k) | The entire commitment was unfunded at November 30, 2016. As such, no interest is being earned on this investment. |
(l) | Included within cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of November 30, 2016. |
F-7
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
February 29, 2016
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Non-control/Non-affiliated investments216.6%(b) |
||||||||||||||||||||
National Truck Protection Co., Inc.(d),(g) |
Automotive Aftermarket | Common Stock | 1,116 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,695,303 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||
National Truck Protection Co., Inc.(d) |
Automotive Aftermarket | First Lien Term Loan 15.50% Cash, 9/13/2018 | $ | 6,776,770 | 6,776,770 | 6,776,770 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Take 5 Oil Change, L.L.C.(d),(g) |
Automotive Aftermarket | Common Stock | 7,128 | 480,535 | 6,235,209 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Automotive Aftermarket | 8,257,305 | 14,707,282 | 11.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Legacy Cabinets |
Building Products |
Common Stock Voting A-1 | 2,535 | 220,900 | 2,676,909 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Legacy Cabinets |
Building Products |
Common Stock Voting B-1 | 1,600 | 139,424 | 1,689,568 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Polar Holding Company, |
Building Products |
First Lien Term Loan (L+9.00%), 10.00% Cash, 9/30/2016 | $ | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Building Products | 2,360,324 | 6,366,477 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC(g) |
Business Services |
Common Stock | 100,000 | 100,000 | 169,850 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC |
Business Services |
First Lien Term Loan (L+8.25%), 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 | $ | 2,406,342 | 2,376,045 | 2,382,844 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC(j),(k) |
Business Services |
Delayed Draw Term Loan A (L+8.25%), 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 | $ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
BMC Software, Inc.(d) |
Business Services |
Syndicated Loan (L+4.00%), 5.00% Cash, 9/10/2020 | $ | 5,671,667 | 5,633,920 | 4,520,318 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Courion Corporation |
Business Services |
Second Lien Term Loan (L+10.00%), 11.00% Cash, 6/1/2021 | $ | 15,000,000 | 14,856,720 | 14,850,000 | 11.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Dispensing Dynamics |
Business Services |
Senior Secured Note 12.50% Cash, 1/1/2018 | $ | 12,000,000 | 12,025,101 | 10,950,000 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Easy Ice, LLC(d) |
Business Services |
First Lien Term Loan (L+8.75%), 9.50% Cash, 1/15/2020 | $ | 14,000,000 | 13,873,485 | 13,806,098 | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, L.L.C. |
Business Services |
Senior Secured Note (L+8.50%), 10.00% Cash, 1/23/2020 | $ | 8,400,000 | 8,305,033 | 8,568,000 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, L.L.C.(g) |
Business Services |
Warrant Membership Interests, Expires 12/28/2022 | 49,318 | 400,000 | 577,020 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Erwin, Inc. |
Business Services |
Second Lien Term Loan (L+11.50%), 13.50% (12.50% Cash/1.00% PIK), 8/28/2021 | $ | 13,000,000 | 12,870,023 | 12,870,000 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Finalsite Holdings, Inc. |
Business Services |
Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.00%), 10.25% Cash, 5/21/2020 | $ | 7,500,000 | 7,440,729 | 7,500,000 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.(Help/Systems, LLC) |
Business Services |
First Lien Term Loan (L+5.25%), 6.25% Cash, 10/8/2021 | $ | 5,000,000 | 4,904,573 | 4,895,000 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.(Help/Systems, LLC) |
Business Services |
Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.50%), 10.50% Cash, 10/8/2022 | $ | 3,000,000 | 2,912,784 | 2,910,000 | 2.3 | % |
F-8
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Identity Automation |
Business Services |
Common Stock Class A Units | 232,616 | 232,616 | 427,409 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems |
Business Services |
First Lien Term Loan (L+9.25%), 10.25% Cash, 12/18/2020 | $ | 6,900,000 | 6,842,573 | 6,900,000 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems(j),(k) |
Business Services |
Delayed Draw Term Loan 10.25% Cash, 12/18/2020 | $ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Knowland Technology Holdings, L.L.C. |
Business Services |
First Lien Term Loan 8.00% Cash, 11/29/2017 | $ | 5,259,171 | 5,224,422 | 5,259,171 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., |
Business Services |
First Lien Term Loan, 14.00% (12.00% Cash/2.00% PIK), 3/6/2018 | $ | 9,035,515 | 8,952,442 | 9,035,515 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., |
Business Services |
Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests, Expires 5/31/2025 | 343 | | 354,819 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Business Services | 106,950,466 | 105,976,044 | 84.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Advanced Air & Heat of Florida, LLC |
Consumer Products | First Lien Term Loan 9.50% Cash, 7/17/2020 | $ | 6,800,000 | 6,733,661 | 6,800,000 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d),(g) |
Consumer Products | Common Stock | 210,456 | 1,791,242 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Products | Second Lien Term Loan A-2 15.00% PIK, 12/31/2019 | $ | 210,456 | 210,456 | 210,456 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Products | Second Lien Term Loan B 15.00% PIK, 12/31/2019 | $ | 631,369 | 631,369 | 631,369 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Products | 9,366,728 | 7,641,825 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Expedited Travel L.L.C.(g) |
Consumer Services | Common Stock | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,647,767 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Expedited Travel L.L.C. |
Consumer Services | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 10/10/2019 | $ | 11,475,490 | 11,401,380 | 11,647,623 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||||
My Alarm Center, LLC |
Consumer Services | Second Lien Term Loan (L+11.00%), 12.00% Cash, 7/9/2019 | $ | 7,500,000 | 7,500,000 | 7,450,500 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, |
Consumer Services | First Lien Term Loan (L+5.25%), 6.50% Cash, 7/1/2019 | $ | 1,572,921 | 1,562,787 | 1,556,248 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, |
Consumer Services | Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.00%), 10.25% Cash, 7/1/2020 | $ | 10,000,000 | 9,962,104 | 9,827,000 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Prime Security Services, LLC |
Consumer Services | Second Lien Term Loan (L+8.75%), 9.75% Cash, 7/1/2022 | $ | 12,000,000 | 11,829,030 | 10,980,000 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Services | 43,255,301 | 43,109,138 | 34.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., L.L.C.(d),(g) |
Education | Class A Common Stock | 544,761 | 30,241 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., L.L.C.(d) |
Education | First Lien Term Loan 1.00% Cash, 3/31/2016 | $ | 2,321,073 | 1,193,790 | 8,087 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Teachers of Tomorrow, LLC(g),(h) |
Education | Common Stock | 750 | 750,000 | 785,475 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Teachers of Tomorrow, LLC |
Education | Second Lien Term Loan (L+9.75%), 10.75% Cash, 6/2/2021 | $ | 10,000,000 | 9,902,816 | 9,900,000 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Education | 11,876,847 | 10,693,562 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TM Restaurant Group L.L.C. |
Food and Beverage | First Lien Term Loan (L+8.50%), 9.75% Cash, 7/16/2017 | $ | 9,622,319 | 9,527,041 | 9,131,048 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Food and Beverage | 9,527,041 | 9,131,048 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Bristol Hospice, LLC |
Healthcare Services | Senior Secured Note 11.00% (10.00% Cash/1.00% PIK), 11/29/2018 | $ | 5,404,747 | 5,339,820 | 5,404,747 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, Inc. |
Healthcare Services | First Lien Term Loan B (L+10.00%), 11.00% Cash, 7/24/2019 | $ | 11,550,000 | 11,377,810 | 11,459,418 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, |
Healthcare Services | Limited Partner Interests | 999 | 999,000 | 810,642 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, Inc.(d),(g) |
Healthcare Services | Common Stock | 5,000 | 500,000 | 334,000 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, Inc. |
Healthcare Services | Second Lien Term Loan 11.25% Cash, 9/26/2019 | $ | 4,200,000 | 4,141,519 | 3,822,000 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Ohio Medical, LLC(g) |
Healthcare Services | Common Stock | 5,000 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Ohio Medical, LLC |
Healthcare Services | Senior Subordinated Note 12.00%, 7/15/2021 | $ | 7,300,000 | 7,228,452 | 7,227,000 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Smile Brands Group Inc.(d) |
Healthcare Services | Syndicated Loan (L+7.75%), 10.50% (9.00% Cash/1.50% PIK), 8/16/2019 | $ | 4,420,900 | 4,362,266 | 3,216,647 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Zest Holdings, LLC(d) |
Healthcare Services | Syndicated Loan (L+4.25%), 5.25% Cash, 8/16/2020 | $ | 4,207,821 | 4,142,093 | 4,130,692 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Healthcare Services | 38,590,960 | 36,905,146 | 29.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 5/16/2019 | $ | 8,937,982 | 8,812,479 | 8,937,983 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 5/16/2019 | $ | 1,600,000 | 1,572,821 | 1,600,000 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | Class A Series, Expires 1/16/2025 | 4,264 | 61,647 | 314,683 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | Class A Warrant, Expires 1/16/2025 | 30,320 | 438,353 | 1,889,542 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests (Common), Expires 5/16/2024 | 57,872 | | 3,309,121 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests, Expires 5/16/2024 | 8,139 | | 523,012 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Media | 10,885,300 | 16,574,341 | 13.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, |
Metals | Common Stock | 35,000 | 9,217,564 | 2,026,150 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, |
Metals | Revolver 10.00% Cash, 3/31/2017 | $ | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Metals | 17,717,564 | 10,526,150 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Mercury Network, LLC |
Real Estate | First Lien Term Loan (L+9.25%), 10.25% Cash, 4/24/2020 | $ | 9,025,000 | 8,944,211 | 9,025,000 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Mercury Network, LLC(g) |
Real Estate | Common Stock | 413,043 | 413,043 | 512,173 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Total Real Estate | 9,357,254 | 9,537,173 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub Total Non-control/Nonaffiliated investments |
268,145,090 | 271,168,186 | 216.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Control investments10.3%(b) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.(a),(d),(e),(f) |
Structured Finance Securities |
Other/Structured Finance Securities 16.14%, 10/17/2023 | $ | 30,000,000 | 13,030,751 | 12,827,980 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub Total Control investments |
13,030,751 | 12,827,980 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS226.9%(b) |
$ | 281,175,841 | $ | 283,996,166 | 226.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
Principal | Cost | Fair Value | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts5.6% |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Bank Money Market(l) |
$ | 7,034,783 | $ | 7,034,783 | $ | 7,034,783 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
$ | 7,034,783 | $ | 7,034,783 | $ | 7,034,783 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Represents a non-qualifying investment as defined under Section 55 (a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Non-qualifying assets represent 5.2% of the Companys portfolio at fair value. As a BDC, the Company can only invest 30% of its portfolio in non-qualifying assets. |
(b) | Percentages are based on net assets of $125,149,875 as of February 29, 2016. |
(c) | Because there is no readily available market value for these investments, the fair value of these investments is approved in good faith by our board of directors (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(d) | These securities are pledged as collateral under a senior secured revolving credit facility (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(e) | This investment does not have a stated interest rate that is payable thereon. As a result, the 16.14% interest rate in the table above represents the effective interest rate currently earned on the investment cost and is based on the current cash interest and other income generated by the investment. |
(f) | As defined in the Investment Company Act, we Control this portfolio company because we own more than 25% of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the period in which the issuer was both an Affiliate and a portfolio company that we Control are as follows: |
Interest | Management | Net Realized | Net Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
Purchases | Redemptions | Sales (Cost) | Income | Fee Income | Gains/(Losses) | Depreciation | |||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,665,648 | $ | 1,494,779 | $ | | $ | (1,280,916 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) | Non-income producing at February 29, 2016. |
(h) | Includes securities issued by an affiliate of the Company. |
(i) | Non-U.S. company. The principal place of business for Polar Holding Company, Ltd. is Canada. |
(j) | The investment has an unfunded commitment as of February 29, 2016 (see Note 7). |
(k) | The entire commitment was unfunded at February 29, 2016. As such, no interest is being earned on this investment. |
(l) | Included within cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of February 29, 2016. |
F-11
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
(unaudited)
For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 |
For the nine months ended November 30, 2015 |
|||||||
INCREASE FROM OPERATIONS: |
||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 8,561,204 | $ | 7,578,534 | ||||
Net realized gain from investments |
12,299,899 | 4,231,006 | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(10,728,122 | ) | 239,354 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
10,132,981 | 12,048,894 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
DECREASE FROM SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTIONS: |
||||||||
Distributions declared |
(8,472,209 | ) | (10,767,093 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in net assets from shareholder distributions |
(8,472,209 | ) | (10,767,093 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
||||||||
Stock dividend distribution |
4,125,696 | 3,778,630 | ||||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(3,256,613 | ) | (38,981 | ) | ||||
Offering costs |
| (346,826 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions |
869,083 | 3,392,823 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total increase in net assets |
2,529,855 | 4,674,624 | ||||||
Net assets at beginning of period |
125,149,875 | 122,598,742 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net assets at end of period |
$ | 127,679,730 | $ | 127,273,366 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net asset value per common share |
$ | 22.21 | $ | 22.59 | ||||
Common shares outstanding at end of period |
5,748,247 | 5,634,115 | ||||||
Distribution in excess of net investment income |
$ | (26,128,907 | ) | $ | (27,094,304 | ) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-12
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 |
For the nine months ended November 30, 2015 |
|||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | 10,132,981 | $ | 12,048,894 | ||||
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Payment-in-kind interest income |
(433,609 | ) | (900,398 | ) | ||||
Net accretion of discount on investments |
(408,557 | ) | (377,279 | ) | ||||
Amortization of deferred debt financing costs |
775,707 | 669,831 | ||||||
Net realized gain from investments |
(12,299,899 | ) | (4,231,006 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments |
10,728,122 | (239,354 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales and repayments of investments |
94,691,232 | 62,676,779 | ||||||
Purchase of investments |
(85,850,895 | ) | (57,428,806 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in operating assets: |
||||||||
Interest receivable |
(788,833 | ) | (504,339 | ) | ||||
Due from affiliate |
(46,078 | ) | | |||||
Management fee receivable |
(959 | ) | 1,657 | |||||
Other assets |
106,195 | (163,557 | ) | |||||
Receivable from unsettled trades |
15,097 | | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: |
||||||||
Base management and incentive fees payable |
338,491 | (178,074 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(183,082 | ) | (176,414 | ) | ||||
Interest and debt fees payable |
(453,760 | ) | (555,104 | ) | ||||
Payable for repurchases of common stock |
(20,957 | ) | | |||||
Directors fees payable |
19,500 | (10,500 | ) | |||||
Due to manager |
59,603 | (3,958 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
16,380,299 | 10,628,372 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Borrowings on debt |
9,000,000 | 10,600,000 | ||||||
Paydowns on debt |
| (20,200,000 | ) | |||||
Issuance of notes |
| 13,074,525 | ||||||
Payments of deferred debt financing costs |
(644,845 | ) | (458,753 | ) | ||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(3,256,613 | ) | (38,981 | ) | ||||
Payments of cash dividends |
(5,222,112 | ) | (6,503,846 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(123,570 | ) | (3,527,055 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESERVE ACCOUNTS |
16,256,729 | 7,101,317 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESERVE ACCOUNTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
7,034,783 | 20,063,372 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESERVE ACCOUNTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 23,291,512 | $ | 27,164,689 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental information: |
||||||||
Interest paid during the period |
$ | 6,784,922 | $ | 6,126,220 | ||||
Supplemental non-cash information: |
||||||||
Payment-in-kind interest income |
$ | 433,609 | $ | 900,398 | ||||
Net accretion of discount on investments |
$ | 408,557 | $ | 377,279 | ||||
Amortization of deferred debt financing costs |
$ | 775,707 | $ | 669,831 | ||||
Stock dividend distribution |
$ | 4,125,696 | $ | 3,778,630 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-13
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
November 30, 2016
(unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Saratoga Investment Corp. (the Company, we, our and us) is a non-diversified closed-end management investment company incorporated in Maryland that has elected to be treated and is regulated as a business development company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Company commenced operations on March 23, 2007 as GSC Investment Corp. and completed the initial public offering (IPO) on March 28, 2007. The Company has elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (RIC) under subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). The Company expects to continue to qualify and to elect to be treated, for tax purposes, as a RIC. The Companys investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation from its investments.
GSC Investment, LLC (the LLC) was organized in May 2006 as a Maryland limited liability company. As of February 28, 2007, the LLC had not yet commenced its operations and investment activities.
On March 21, 2007, the Company was incorporated and concurrently therewith the LLC was merged with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving entity, in accordance with the procedure for such merger in the LLCs limited liability company agreement and Maryland law. In connection with such merger, each outstanding limited liability company interest of the LLC was converted into a share of common stock of the Company.
On July 30, 2010, the Company changed its name from GSC Investment Corp. to Saratoga Investment Corp. in connection with the consummation of a recapitalization transaction.
The Company is externally managed and advised by the investment adviser, Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC (the Manager), pursuant to a management agreement (the Management Agreement). Prior to July 30, 2010, the Company was managed and advised by GSCP (NJ), L.P.
The Company has established wholly-owned subsidiaries, SIA Avionte, Inc., SIA GH, Inc., SIA Mercury, Inc., SIA TT, Inc., and SIA Vector, Inc., which are structured as Delaware entities, or tax blockers, to hold equity or equity-like investments in portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs (or other forms of pass through entities). Tax blockers are consolidated for accounting purposes, but are not consolidated for income tax purposes and may incur income tax expense as a result of their ownership of portfolio companies.
On March 28, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC, LP (SBIC LP), received a Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) license from the Small Business Administration (SBA).
On April 2, 2015, the SBA issued a green light letter inviting the Company to continue the application process to obtain a license to form and operate its second SBIC subsidiary. On September 27, 2016, the SBA informed us that as part of their continued review of our application for a second license, and in order to ensure that they were reviewing the most current information available, we would need to update all previously submitted materials and invited us to reapply. As a result of this request, with which we are in the process of complying, the existing green light letter that the SBA issued to us will expire. If approved in the future, a second SBIC license would provide us an incremental source of long-term capital by permitting us to issue up to $150.0 million of additional SBA-guaranteed debentures in addition to the $150.0 million already approved under the first license.
F-14
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP), are stated in U.S. Dollars and include the accounts of the Company and its special purpose financing subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Funding, LLC (previously known as GSC Investment Funding LLC). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All references made to the Company, we, and us herein include Saratoga Investment Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries, except as stated otherwise.
The Company and SBIC LP are both considered to be investment companies for financial reporting purposes and have applied the guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 946, Financial ServicesInvestment Companies (ASC Topic 946). There have been no changes to the Company or SBIC LPs status as investment companies during the nine months ended November 30, 2016.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and income, gains (losses) and expenses during the period reported. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term, liquid investments in a money market fund. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value. Per section 12(d)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, the Company may not invest in another registered investment company such as a money market fund if such investment would cause the Company to exceed any of the following limitations:
| we were to own more than 3.0% of the total outstanding voting stock of the money market fund; |
| we were to hold securities in the money market fund having an aggregate value in excess of 5.0% of the value of our total assets; or |
| we were to hold securities in money market funds and other registered investment companies and BDCs having an aggregate value in excess of 10.0% of the value of our total assets. |
As of November 30, 2016, the Company did not exceed any of these limitations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Reserve Accounts
Cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts include amounts held in designated bank accounts, in the form of cash and short-term liquid investments in money market funds, representing payments received on secured investments or other reserved amounts associated with our $45.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility with Madison Capital Funding LLC. The Company is required to use these amounts to pay interest expense, reduce borrowings, or pay other amounts in accordance with the terms of the senior secured revolving credit facility.
In addition, cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts also include amounts held in designated bank accounts, in the form of cash and short-term liquid investments in money market funds, within our wholly-owned subsidiary, SBIC LP.
F-15
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18). ASU 2016-18 requires that the statements of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-18 as of November 30, 2016. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2016-18 did not materially impact the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. Prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts reported within the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows:
November 30, 2016 |
November 30, 2015 |
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 5,770,230 | $ | 6,019,448 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
17,521,282 | 21,145,241 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cash and cash equivalents, and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
$ | 23,291,512 | $ | 27,164,689 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Investment Classification
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, Control Investments are defined as investments in companies in which we own more than 25.0% of the voting securities or maintain greater than 50.0% of the board representation. Under the 1940 Act, Affiliated Investments are defined as those non-control investments in companies in which we own between 5.0% and 25.0% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, Non-affiliated Investments are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliated Investments.
Investment Valuation
The Company accounts for its investments at fair value in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. ASC 820 requires the Company to assume that its investments are to be sold at the balance sheet date in the principal market to independent market participants, or in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market, which may be a hypothetical market. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are fair valued at such market quotations obtained from independent third party pricing services and market makers subject to any decision by our board of directors to approve a fair value determination to reflect significant events affecting the value of these investments. We value investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair value as approved, in good faith, by our board of directors based on input from our Manager, the audit committee of our board of directors and a third party independent valuation firm. Determinations of fair value may involve subjective judgments and estimates. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make
F-16
payments, market yield trend analysis, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.
We undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter when valuing investments for which market quotations are not readily available, as described below:
| Each investment is initially valued by the responsible investment professionals of our Manager and preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with the senior management of our Manager; and |
| An independent valuation firm, engaged by our board of directors, reviews a selection of these preliminary valuations each quarter so that the valuation of each investment for which market quotes are not readily available is reviewed by the independent valuation firm at least once each fiscal year. |
In addition, all our investments are subject to the following valuation process:
| The audit committee of our board of directors reviews and approves each preliminary valuation and our Manager and independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee; and |
| Our board of directors discusses the valuations and approves the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of our Manager, independent valuation firm (to the extent applicable) and the audit committee of our board of directors. |
Our investment in Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (Saratoga CLO) is carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for equity interests in collateralized loan obligation funds similar to Saratoga CLO, when available, as determined by our Manager and recommended to our board of directors. Specifically, we use Intex cash flow models, or an appropriate substitute, to form the basis for the valuation of our investment in Saratoga CLO. The models use a set of assumptions including projected default rates, recovery rates, reinvestment rates and prepayment rates in order to arrive at estimated valuations. The assumptions are based on available market data and projections provided by third parties as well as management estimates. We use the output from the Intex models (i.e., the estimated cash flows) to perform a discounted cash flow analysis on expected future cash flows to determine a valuation for our investment in Saratoga CLO. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The determination of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). ASC 815 requires recognizing all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company values derivative contracts at the closing fair value provided by the counterparty. Changes in the values of derivative contracts are included in the consolidated statements of operations.
Investment Transactions and Income Recognition
Purchases and sales of investments and the related realized gains or losses are recorded on a trade-date basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company stops accruing interest on its
F-17
investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Discounts and premiums on investments purchased are accreted/amortized over the life of the respective investment using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on investments.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. Accrued interest is generally reserved when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as a reduction in principal depending upon managements judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in managements judgment, are likely to remain current, although we may make exceptions to this general rule if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection.
Interest income on our investment in Saratoga CLO is recorded using the effective interest method in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 325-40, Investments-Other, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, (ASC 325-40), based on the anticipated yield and the estimated cash flows over the projected life of the investment. Yields are revised when there are changes in actual or estimated cash flows due to changes in prepayments and/or re-investments, credit losses or asset pricing. Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an adjustment to the estimated yield over the remaining life of the investment from the date the estimated yield was changed.
Other Income
Other income includes dividends received, origination fees, structuring fees and advisory fees, and is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations when earned.
Payment-in-Kind Interest
The Company holds debt investments in its portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind (PIK) interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the investment balance that is generally due at maturity, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. We stop accruing PIK interest if we do not expect the issuer to be able to pay all principal and interest when due.
Deferred Debt Financing Costs
Financing costs incurred in connection with our credit facility and notes are deferred and amortized using the straight line method over the life of the respective facility and debt securities. Financing costs incurred in connection with our SBA debentures are deferred and amortized using the effective yield method over the life of the debentures.
ASU 2015-03, InterestImputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (ASU 2015-03) requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 as of February 28, 2015, by reclassifying deferred debt financing costs from within total assets to within total liabilities as a contra-liability. Prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may enter into contracts or agreements that contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of these provisions against the Company. Based on its history and experience, management feels that the likelihood of such an event is remote. Therefore, the Company has not accrued any liabilities in connection with such indemnifications.
F-18
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may directly or indirectly be a defendant or plaintiff in legal actions with respect to bankruptcy, insolvency or other types of proceedings. Such lawsuits may involve claims that could adversely affect the value of certain financial instruments owned by the Company.
Income Taxes
The Company has filed an election to be treated, for tax purposes, as a RIC under the Code and, among other things, intends to make the requisite distributions to its stockholders which will relieve the Company from federal income taxes. Therefore, no provision has been recorded for federal income taxes.
In order to qualify as a RIC, among other requirements, the Company is required to timely distribute to its stockholders at least 90.0% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each fiscal tax year. The Company will be subject to a nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax of 4.0% on undistributed income if it does not distribute at least 98.0% of its ordinary income in any calendar year and 98.2% of its capital gain net income for each one-year period ending on October 31.
Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4.0% excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions for excise tax purposes, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned.
In accordance with certain applicable U.S. Treasury regulations and private letter rulings issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC subject to a limitation on the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders, which limitation must be at least 20.0% of the aggregate declared distribution. If too many stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash will receive a pro rata amount of cash (with the balance of the distribution paid in stock). In no event will any stockholder, electing to receive cash, receive less than 20.0% of his or her entire distribution in cash. If these and certain other requirements are met, for U.S federal income tax purposes, the amount of the dividend paid in stock will be equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead of stock.
ASC 740, Income Taxes, (ASC 740), provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Companys tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions deemed to meet a more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current period. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense on the consolidated statements of operations. During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2016, the Company did not incur any interest or penalties. Although we file federal and state tax returns, our major tax jurisdiction is federal. The 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 federal tax years for the Company remain subject to examination by the IRS. As of November 30, 2016 and February 29, 2016, there were no uncertain tax positions. The Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next 12 months.
Dividends
Dividends to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the board of directors. Net realized capital gains, if any, are generally distributed at least annually, although we may decide to retain such capital gains for reinvestment.
F-19
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) that provides for reinvestment of our dividend distributions on behalf of our stockholders unless a stockholder elects to receive cash. As a result, if our board of directors authorizes, and we declare a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not opted out of the DRIP by the dividend record date will have their cash dividends automatically reinvested into additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash dividends. We have the option to satisfy the share requirements of the DRIP through the issuance of new shares of common stock or through open market purchases of common stock by the DRIP plan administrator.
Capital Gains Incentive Fee
The Company records an expense accrual on the consolidated statements of operations, relating to the capital gains incentive fee payable on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, by the Company to its investment adviser when the net realized and unrealized gain on its investments exceed all net realized and unrealized capital losses on its investments given the fact that a capital gains incentive fee would be owed to the investment adviser if the Company were to liquidate its investment portfolio at such time. The actual incentive fee payable to the Companys investment adviser related to capital gains will be determined and payable in arrears at the end of each fiscal year and will include only realized capital gains, net of realized and unrealized losses for the period.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (ASU 2016-15), which is intended to reduce the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact ASU 2016-15 will have on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Amendments to the Leases (ASC Topic 842), which will require for all operating leases the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, in the statement of financial position. The lease cost will be allocated over the lease term on a straight-line basis. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the impact these changes will have on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial InstrumentsOverall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01). ASU 2016-01 retains many current requirements for the classification and measurement of financial instruments; however, it significantly revises an entitys accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. ASU 2016-01 also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted for public business entities. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard has on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that requires management to assess an entitys ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. The amendments provide a definition of the term substantial doubt and include principles for considering the mitigating effect of managements plans. The amendments also require an evaluation every reporting period, including interim periods for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued), and certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated or not alleviated. The amendments in this update are effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016. Management does not believe these changes will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
F-20
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). Under the new guidance, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In May 2016, ASU 2016-12 amended ASU 2014-09 and deferred the effective period to December 15, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact these changes will have on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Risk Management
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company manages a variety of risks, including market risk and credit risk. Market risk is the risk of potential adverse changes to the value of investments because of changes in market conditions such as interest rate movements and volatility in investment prices.
Credit risk is the risk of default or non-performance by portfolio companies, equivalent to the investments carrying amount.
The Company is also exposed to credit risk related to maintaining all of its cash and cash equivalents, including those in reserve accounts, at a major financial institution and credit risk related to any of its derivative counterparties.
The Company has investments in lower rated and comparable quality unrated high yield bonds and bank loans. Investments in high yield investments are accompanied by a greater degree of credit risk. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer is significantly greater for holders of high yield securities, because such investments are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.
Note 3. Investments
As noted above, the Company values all investments in accordance with ASC 820. ASC 820 requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value. As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
ASC 820 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability of inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide disclosures on fair value measurements according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the observability of the inputs used to determine fair values. Investments carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
| Level 1Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. |
| Level 2Valuations based on inputs other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable. |
| Level 3Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The inputs used in the determination of fair value may require significant management |
F-21
judgment or estimation. Such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by a disclaimer would result in classification as a Level 3 asset, assuming no additional corroborating evidence. |
In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, the Company continues to employ the valuation policy approved by the board of directors that is consistent with ASC 820 and the 1940 Act (see Note 2). Consistent with our valuation policy, we evaluate the source of inputs, including any markets in which our investments are trading, in determining fair value.
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of November 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands), according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | | $ | | $ | 9,627 | $ | 9,627 | ||||||||
First lien term loans |
| | 160,460 | 160,460 | ||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
| | 80,195 | 80,195 | ||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
| | 15,266 | 15,266 | ||||||||||||
Equity interests |
| | 12,022 | 12,022 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | | $ | 277,570 | $ | 277,570 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of February 29, 2016 (dollars in thousands), according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | | $ | | $ | 11,868 | $ | 11,868 | ||||||||
First lien term loans |
| | 144,643 | 144,643 | ||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
| | 88,178 | 88,178 | ||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
| | 12,828 | 12,828 | ||||||||||||
Equity interests |
| | 26,479 | 26,479 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | | $ | 283,996 | $ | 283,996 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the nine months ended November 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Syndicated loans |
First lien term loans |
Second lien term loans |
Structured finance securities |
Common stock/ equities |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of February 29, 2016 |
$ | 11,868 | $ | 144,643 | $ | 88,178 | $ | 12,828 | $ | 26,479 | $ | 283,996 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
2,221 | (174 | ) | 290 | 20 | (13,085 | ) | (10,728 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Purchases and other adjustments to cost |
56 | 69,671 | 10,996 | 4,500 | 1,470 | 86,693 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and repayments |
(4,571 | ) | (54,033 | ) | (19,500 | ) | (2,082 | ) | (14,505 | ) | (94,691 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain from investments |
53 | 353 | 231 | | 11,663 | 12,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance as of November 30, 2016 |
$ | 9,627 | $ | 160,460 | $ | 80,195 | $ | 15,266 | $ | 12,022 | $ | 277,570 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
Syndicated loans |
First lien term loans |
Second lien term loans |
Structured finance securities |
Common stock/ equities |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gains (losses): |
$ | 1,075 | $ | 204 | $ | (500 | ) | $ | 20 | $ | (1,981 | ) | $ | (1,182 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and other adjustments to cost include purchases of new investments at cost, effects of refinancing/restructuring, accretion/amortization of income from discount/premium on debt securities, and PIK.
Sales and repayments represent net proceeds received from investments sold, and principal paydowns received, during the period.
Transfers and restructurings, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which they occur.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the nine months ended November 30, 2015 (dollars in thousands):
Syndicated loans |
First lien term loans |
Second lien term loans |
Unsecured notes |
Structured finance securities |
Common stock/ equities |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of February 28, 2015 |
$ | 18,302 | $ | 145,207 | $ | 35,603 | $ | 4,230 | $ | 17,031 | $ | 20,165 | $ | 240,538 | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(1,442 | ) | (1,271 | ) | (67 | ) | 656 | 1,030 | 1,333 | 239 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchases and other adjustments to cost |
30 | 30,254 | 27,341 | 669 | | 413 | 58,707 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and repayments |
(2,370 | ) | (28,657 | ) | (19,502 | ) | (5,917 | ) | (2,285 | ) | (3,946 | ) | (62,677 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net realized gain from investments |
18 | 106 | 186 | 261 | | 3,660 | 4,231 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restructures in |
| | | 101 | | | 101 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restructures out |
| | | | | (101 | ) | (101 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance as of November 30, 2015 |
$ | 14,538 | $ | 145,639 | $ | 43,561 | $ | | $ | 15,776 | $ | 21,524 | $ | 241,038 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gains (losses): |
$ | (1,458 | ) | $ | (1,270 | ) | $ | (187 | ) | $ | 92 | $ | 1,030 | $ | 1,577 | $ | (216 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and other adjustments to cost include purchases of new investments at cost, effects of refinancing/restructuring, accretion/amortization of income from discount/premium on debt securities, and PIK.
F-23
Sales and repayments represent net proceeds received from investments sold, and principal paydowns received, during the period.
Transfers and restructurings, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which they occur.
The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of assets as of November 30, 2016 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Fair Value | Valuation Technique |
Unobservable Input |
Range | |||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | 9,627 | Market Comparables | Third-Party Bid (%) | 97.6% - 99.9% | |||||
First lien term loans |
160,460 | Market Comparables | Market Yield (%) | 6.4% - 16.4% | ||||||
EBITDA Multiples (x) | 1.0x - 6.8x | |||||||||
Third-Party Bid (%) | 96.0% - 99.9% | |||||||||
Second lien term loans |
80,195 | Market Comparables | Market Yield (%) | 8.3% - 15.0% | ||||||
Third-Party Bid (%) | 94.0% - 102.0% | |||||||||
Structured finance securities |
15,266 | Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate (%) | 10.5% - 15.0% | ||||||
Equity interests |
12,022 | Market Comparables | EBITDA Multiples (x) | 2.9x - 11.9x |
The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of assets as of February 29, 2016 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Fair Value | Valuation Technique |
Unobservable Input |
Range | |||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | 11,868 | Market Comparables | Third-Party Bid (%) | 72.5% - 98.2% | |||||
First lien term loans |
144,643 | Market Comparables | Market Yield (%) | 6.8% - 15.5% | ||||||
EBITDA Multiples (x) | 1.0x | |||||||||
Revenue Multiples (x) Third-Party Bid (%) |
91.3% - 98.9% | |||||||||
Second lien term loans |
88,178 | Market Comparables | Market Yield (%) | 0.0% - 15.0% | ||||||
Third-Party Bid (%) | 91.5% - 98.6% | |||||||||
Structured finance securities |
12,828 | Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate (%) | 20.0% | ||||||
Equity interests |
26,479 | Market Comparables | EBITDA Multiples (x) Revenue Multiples (x) |
6.8x - 16.4x |
For investments utilizing a market comparables valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the market yield, in isolation, would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement, and a significant increase (decrease) in any of the EBITDA or revenue valuation multiples, in isolation, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. For investments utilizing a discounted cash flow valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the discount rate, in isolation, would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. For investments utilizing a market quote in deriving a value, a significant increase (decrease) in the market quote, in isolation, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
F-24
The composition of our investments as of November 30, 2016, at amortized cost and fair value was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Investments at Amortized Cost |
Amortized Cost Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | 9,677 | 3.4 | % | $ | 9,627 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||
First lien term loans |
162,236 | 56.8 | 160,460 | 57.8 | ||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
81,213 | 28.5 | 80,195 | 28.9 | ||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
15,448 | 5.4 | 15,266 | 5.5 | ||||||||||||
Equity interests |
16,904 | 5.9 | 12,022 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 285,478 | 100.0 | % | $ | 277,570 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of our investments as of February 29, 2016, at amortized cost and fair value was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Investments at Amortized Cost |
Amortized Cost Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | 14,138 | 5.0 | % | $ | 11,868 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||
First lien term loans |
146,246 | 52.0 | 144,643 | 50.9 | ||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
89,486 | 31.9 | 88,178 | 31.1 | ||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
13,031 | 4.6 | 12,828 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||
Equity interests |
18,275 | 6.5 | 26,479 | 9.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 281,176 | 100.0 | % | $ | 283,996 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For loans and debt securities for which market quotations are not available, we determine their fair value based on third party indicative broker quotes, where available, or the assumptions that a hypothetical market participant would use to value the security in a current hypothetical sale using a market yield valuation methodology. In applying the market yield valuation methodology, we determine the fair value based on such factors as market participant assumptions including synthetic credit ratings, estimated remaining life, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. If, in our judgment, the market yield methodology is not sufficient or appropriate, we may use additional methodologies such as an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
For equity securities of portfolio companies and partnership interests, we determine the fair value based on the market approach with value then attributed to equity or equity like securities using the enterprise value waterfall valuation methodology. Under the enterprise value waterfall valuation methodology, we determine the enterprise fair value of the portfolio company and then waterfall the enterprise value over the portfolio companys securities in order of their preference relative to one another. To estimate the enterprise value of the portfolio company, we weigh some or all of the traditional market valuation methods and factors based on the individual circumstances of the portfolio company in order to estimate the enterprise value. The methodologies for performing investments may be based on, among other things: valuations of comparable public companies, recent sales of private and public comparable companies, discounting the forecasted cash flows of the portfolio company, third party valuations of the portfolio company, considering offers from third parties to buy the company, estimating the value to potential strategic buyers and considering the value of recent investments in the equity securities of the portfolio company. For non-performing investments, we may estimate the liquidation or collateral value of the portfolio companys assets and liabilities. We also take into account historical and anticipated financial results.
Our investment in Saratoga CLO is carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected
F-25
performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for equity interests in collateralized loan obligation funds similar to Saratoga CLO, when available, as determined by our Manager and recommended to our board of directors. Specifically, we use Intex cash flow models, or an appropriate substitute, to form the basis for the valuation of our investment in Saratoga CLO. The models use a set of assumptions including projected default rates, recovery rates, reinvestment rate and prepayment rates in order to arrive at estimated valuations. The assumptions are based on available market data and projections provided by third parties as well as management estimates. For the quarter ended November 30, 2013, in connection with the refinancing of the Saratoga CLO liabilities, we ran Intex models based on assumptions about the refinanced Saratoga CLOs structure, including capital structure, cost of liabilities and reinvestment period. We use the output from the Intex models (i.e., the estimated cash flows) to perform a discounted cash flow analysis on expected future cash flows to determine a valuation for our investment in Saratoga CLO at November 30, 2016. The significant inputs for the valuation model include:
| Default rates: 2.0% |
| Recovery rates: 35-70% |
| Prepayment rate: 20.0% |
| Reinvestment rate / price: L+375bps / $99.50 |
Note 4. Investment in Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (Saratoga CLO)
On January 22, 2008, we invested $30.0 million in all of the outstanding subordinated notes of GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd., a collateralized loan obligation fund managed by us that invests primarily in senior secured loans. Additionally, we entered into a collateral management agreement with GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd. pursuant to which we act as collateral manager to it. The Saratoga CLO was initially refinanced in October 2013 and its reinvestment period ended in October 2016. On November 15, 2016, we completed the second refinancing of the Saratoga CLO. The Saratoga CLO refinancing, among other things, extended its reinvestment period to October 2018, and extended its legal maturity date to October 2025. Following the refinancing, the Saratoga CLO portfolio remained at the same size and with a similar capital structure of approximately $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. In addition to refinancing its liabilities, we also purchased $4.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the Class F notes tranche of the Saratoga CLO at par, with a coupon of LIBOR plus 8.5%.
The Saratoga CLO remains 100% owned and managed by Saratoga Investment Corp. Following the refinancing, we receive a base management fee of 0.10% and a subordinated management fee of 0.40% of the fee basis amount at the beginning of the collection period, paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee equal to 20.0% of excess cash flow to the extent the Saratoga CLO subordinated notes receive an internal rate of return paid in cash equal to or greater than 12.0%. For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we accrued $0.4 million and $0.4 million in management fee income, respectively, and $0.5 million and $0.8 million in interest income, respectively, from Saratoga CLO. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we accrued $1.1 million and $1.1 million in management fee income, respectively, and $1.6 million and $2.0 million in interest income, respectively, from Saratoga CLO. We did not accrue any amounts related to the incentive management fee from Saratoga CLO as the 12.0% hurdle rate has not yet been achieved.
At November 30, 2016, the Company determined that the fair value of its investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO was $11.0 million. The Company determines the fair value of its investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO based on the present value of the projected future cash flows of the subordinated notes over the life of Saratoga CLO. At November 30, 2016, Saratoga CLO had investments with a principal balance of $297.5 million and a weighted average spread over LIBOR of 4.31%, and had debt with a principal balance of $282.4 million with a weighted average spread over LIBOR of 2.35%. As a result, Saratoga CLO earns a spread between the interest income it receives on its investments and the interest expense it pays
F-26
on its debt and other operating expenses, which is distributed quarterly to the Company as the holder of its subordinated notes. At November 30, 2016, the present value of the projected future cash flows of the subordinated notes was approximately $11.0 million, using an 15.0% discount rate. Saratoga Investment Corp. invested $32.8 million into the CLO since January 2008, and to date has since received distributions of $48.5 million and management fees of $16.1 million.
Below is certain financial information from the separate financial statements of Saratoga CLO as of November 30, 2016 (unaudited) and February 29, 2016 and for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015 (unaudited).
F-27
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
As of | ||||||||
November 30, 2016 | February 29, 2016 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments |
||||||||
Fair Value Loans (amortized cost of $294,551,697 and $300,112,538, respectively) |
$ | 289,961,397 | $ | 284,652,926 | ||||
Fair Value Other/Structured finance securities (amortized cost of $3,531,218 and $3,531,218, respectively) |
37,455 | 191,863 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total investments at fair value (amortized cost of $298,082,915 and $303,643,756, respectively) |
289,998,852 | 284,844,789 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
16,002,200 | 2,349,633 | ||||||
Receivable from open trades |
2,500 | 2,691,831 | ||||||
Interest receivable |
1,734,794 | 1,698,562 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 307,738,346 | $ | 291,584,815 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Interest payable |
$ | 883,263 | $ | 626,040 | ||||
Payable from open trades |
11,925,775 | 7,123,854 | ||||||
Due to affiliate |
46,078 | | ||||||
Accrued base management fee |
65,471 | 85,008 | ||||||
Accrued subordinated management fee |
105,504 | 85,008 | ||||||
Class A-1 NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
170,000,000 | 170,000,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class A-1 Notes - SIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
| (1,319,258 | ) | |||||
Class A-2 NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
20,000,000 | 20,000,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class A-2 NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
| (136,750 | ) | |||||
Class B NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
44,800,000 | 44,800,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class B NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
| (888,328 | ) | |||||
Class C NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
16,000,000 | 16,000,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class C NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
(79,605 | ) | (553,078 | ) | ||||
Class D NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
14,000,000 | 14,000,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class D NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
(369,566 | ) | (717,938 | ) | ||||
Class E NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
13,100,000 | 13,100,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class E NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
| (1,353,521 | ) | |||||
Class F NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class F NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
| (492,300 | ) | |||||
Deferred debt financing costs, SIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. Notes |
(973,665 | ) | (1,716,554 | ) | ||||
Subordinated Notes |
30,000,000 | 30,000,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 324,003,255 | $ | 313,142,183 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
NET ASSETS |
||||||||
Ordinary equity, par value $1.00, 250 ordinary shares authorized, 250 and 250 issued and outstanding, respectively |
$ | 250 | $ | 250 | ||||
Accumulated loss |
(21,557,623 | ) | (5,803,406 | ) | ||||
Net gain (loss) |
5,292,464 | (15,754,212 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total net assets |
(16,264,909 | ) | (21,557,368 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and net assets |
$ | 307,738,346 | $ | 291,584,815 | ||||
|
|
|
|
F-28
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.
Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
For the three months ended November 30 |
For the nine months ended November 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
||||||||||||||||
Interest from investments |
$ | 4,006,052 | $ | 3,559,889 | $ | 11,823,053 | $ | 10,711,063 | ||||||||
Interest from cash and cash equivalents |
3,095 | 158 | 5,804 | 663 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
82,239 | 14,064 | 515,376 | 248,057 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total investment income |
4,091,386 | 3,574,111 | 12,344,233 | 10,959,783 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
2,457,705 | 2,912,974 | 9,347,508 | 8,772,617 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees |
39,694 | 66,203 | 79,120 | 178,602 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous fee expense |
25,974 | 9,758 | 48,365 | 20,446 | ||||||||||||
Base management fee |
167,592 | 184,694 | 541,763 | 560,643 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated management fee |
207,625 | 184,694 | 581,796 | 560,643 | ||||||||||||
Trustee expenses |
30,871 | 26,528 | 95,398 | 94,549 | ||||||||||||
Amortization expense |
302,635 | 237,966 | 782,561 | 717,892 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
6,641,915 | | 6,641,915 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total expenses |
9,874,011 | 3,622,817 | 18,118,426 | 10,905,392 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS) |
(5,782,625 | ) | (48,706 | ) | (5,774,193 | ) | 54,391 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS: |
||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
130,337 | 217,472 | 351,753 | 349,117 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
926,507 | (6,609,496 | ) | 10,714,904 | (10,319,542 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net gain (loss) on investments |
1,056,844 | (6,392,024 | ) | 11,066,657 | (9,970,425 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | (4,725,781 | ) | $ | (6,440,730 | ) | $ | 5,292,464 | $ | (9,916,034 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1 Ltd.
Schedule of Investments
November 30, 2016
(unaudited)
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal / Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
A-1 Preferred Shares | Equity | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6,692 | $ | 669,214 | $ | 13,384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
A-2 Preferred Shares | Equity | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 18,975 | 1,897,538 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Millennium Holdco, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Common Stock | Equity | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 14,813 | 964,466 | 24,071 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 Hour Holdings III, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 5/28/2021 | $ | 488,750 | 485,341 | 473,477 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ABB Con-Cise Optical Group, LLC |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 5/28/2021 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,998,314 | 2,012,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acosta Holdco, Inc. |
Media | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 9/26/2021 | $ | 1,960,150 | 1,948,749 | 1,853,577 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Aspen Dental Management, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan Initial | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 4/29/2022 | $ | 1,488,710 | 1,484,608 | 1,497,092 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc. |
Services: Business | Delayed Draw Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 7/25/2021 | $ | 2,452,462 | 2,449,784 | 2,432,033 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Aegis Toxicology Science Corporation |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term B Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 2/24/2021 | $ | 2,469,866 | 2,336,816 | 2,290,801 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Agrofresh, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 7/30/2021 | $ | 1,975,000 | 1,966,724 | 1,866,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Akorn, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 4/16/2021 | $ | 398,056 | 396,882 | 401,042 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Albertsons LLC |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B-4 | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 8/25/2021 | $ | 2,896,193 | 2,886,672 | 2,897,641 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alere Inc. (fka IM US Holdings, LLC) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/20/2022 | $ | 920,276 | 918,381 | 909,923 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alion Science and Technology Corporation |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 8/19/2021 | $ | 2,962,500 | 2,950,476 | 2,899,547 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alliance Healthcare Services, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/3/2019 | $ | 987,141 | 983,080 | 962,462 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Anchor Glass T/L (11/16) |
Containers/Glass Products | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 11/22/2023 | $ | 500,000 | 497,511 | 502,190 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APCO Holdings, Inc. |
Automotive | Term Loan | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 1/31/2022 | $ | 1,966,351 | 1,916,134 | 1,917,192 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
American Beacon Advisors, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 4/30/2022 | $ | 241,440 | 240,465 | 240,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | U.S. Term F Loan | Loan | 2.50 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.25 | % | 2/24/2021 | $ | 3,126,374 | 3,126,374 | 3,149,822 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Astoria Energy T/L B |
Utilities | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 12/24/2021 | $ | 1,500,000 | 1,493,873 | 1,473,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Asurion, LLC (fka Asurion Corporation) |
Insurance | Incremental Tranche B-1 Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5/24/2019 | $ | 531,422 | 527,619 | 533,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Asurion, LLC (fka Asurion Corporation) |
Insurance | Term Loan B4 (First Lien) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 8/4/2022 | $ | 2,440,625 | 2,430,001 | 2,454,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Auction.com, LLC |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 5/13/2019 | $ | 2,725,552 | 2,725,288 | 2,725,552 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Avantor Performance Materials Holdings, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 6/21/2022 | $ | 2,791,407 | 2,767,475 | 2,807,681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Bass Pro Group, LLC |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 6/5/2020 | $ | 1,477,500 | 1,477,457 | 1,465,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Belmond Interfin Ltd. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3/19/2021 | $ | 2,487,500 | 2,490,779 | 2,478,172 |
F-30
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal / Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. |
Food/Drug Retailers | New 2013 (November) Replacement Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 9/26/2019 | $ | 2,432,199 | 2,434,086 | 2,434,996 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Blackboard T/L B4 |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B4 | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 6/30/2021 | $ | 3,000,000 | 2,975,510 | 2,975,640 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BMC Software |
Technology | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 9/10/2020 | $ | 1,964,646 | 1,919,231 | 1,917,495 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BMC Software T/L US |
Technology | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 9/10/2020 | $ | 678,000 | 666,468 | 661,335 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Brickman Group Holdings, Inc. |
Brokers/Dealers/Investment Houses | Initial Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 12/18/2020 | $ | 1,464,943 | 1,454,843 | 1,464,254 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BWAY Holding Company |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 8/14/2020 | $ | 942,307 | 935,335 | 944,267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Camp International Holding Company |
Aerospace and Defense | 2013 Replacement Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 5/31/2019 | $ | 1,930,150 | 1,930,627 | 1,928,954 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Candy Intermediate Holdings, Inc. |
Beverage, Food & Tobacco | Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 6/15/2023 | $ | 498,750 | 496,429 | 498,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Automotive L.P. |
Conglomerate | Tranche B-1 Term Loan Facility | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4/10/2019 | $ | 1,491,216 | 1,493,090 | 1,501,282 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalent Pharma Solutions, Inc |
Drugs | Initial Term B Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 5/20/2021 | $ | 488,752 | 487,090 | 489,885 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cengage Learning Acquisitions, Inc. |
Publishing | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 6/7/2023 | $ | 1,496,250 | 1,495,685 | 1,433,033 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC |
Cable and Satellite Television | Term F Loan | Loan | 2.25 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.00 | % | 12/31/2020 | $ | 1,613,703 | 1,609,776 | 1,616,624 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term G Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 12/31/2019 | $ | 1,014,862 | 992,398 | 959,683 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term H Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 1/27/2021 | $ | 1,867,318 | 1,822,085 | 1,763,458 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CITGO Petroleum Corporation |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 7/29/2021 | $ | 1,969,899 | 1,950,189 | 1,964,974 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Communications Sales & Leasing, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 10/24/2022 | $ | 1,975,000 | 1,964,807 | 1,984,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Aerospace Manufacturing, LLC |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 8/11/2022 | $ | 1,437,500 | 1,431,231 | 1,322,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Concordia Healthcare Corporation |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 10/21/2021 | $ | 1,985,000 | 1,892,204 | 1,660,175 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CPI Acquisition Inc. |
Technology | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 8/17/2022 | $ | 1,436,782 | 1,418,072 | 1,303,879 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CPI International Acquisition, Inc. (f/k/a Catalyst Holdings, Inc.) |
Electronics/Electric | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 11/17/2017 | $ | 2,552,242 | 2,551,083 | 2,533,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Crosby US Acquisition Corporation |
Industrial Equipment | Initial Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 11/23/2020 | $ | 729,375 | 728,747 | 616,322 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CT Technologies Intermediate Hldgs, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 12/1/2021 | $ | 1,473,844 | 1,462,088 | 1,414,890 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Culligan International Company-T/L |
Conglomerate | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 11/17/2023 | $ | 2,005,000 | 2,004,975 | 2,006,263 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Culligan International Company |
Conglomerate | Dollar Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.50 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 12/19/2017 | $ | 3,757,779 | 3,716,494 | 3,738,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Culligan International Company |
Conglomerate | Dollar Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 8.00 | % | 1.50 | % | 0.00 | % | 9.50 | % | 6/19/2018 | $ | 783,162 | 762,650 | 780,225 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulus Media Holdings Inc. |
Broadcast Radio and Television | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 12/23/2020 | $ | 470,093 | 467,173 | 283,231 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DAE Aviation (StandardAero) |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 7/7/2022 | $ | 1,980,000 | 1,971,835 | 1,980,495 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DCS Business Services, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries | Term B Loan | Loan | 7.25 | % | 1.50 | % | 0.00 | % | 8.75 | % | 3/19/2018 | $ | 2,109,675 | 2,102,627 | 2,109,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Delta 2 (Lux) S.a.r.l. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan B-3 | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 7/30/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 996,370 | 1,005,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deluxe Entertainment Service Group, Inc. |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (Incremental) | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 2/28/2020 | $ | 1,000,000 | 970,592 | 971,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deluxe Entertainment Service Group, Inc. |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 5.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 2/28/2020 | $ | 1,880,622 | 1,881,696 | 1,837,518 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Diebold, Inc. |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 11/6/2023 | $ | 400,000 | 396,246 | 403,668 |
F-31
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal / Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DJO Finance, LLC |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/8/2020 | $ | 493,750 | 492,061 | 472,766 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DPX Holdings B.V. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan 2015 Incr Dollar | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 3/11/2021 | $ | 2,932,500 | 2,927,036 | 2,936,166 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Drew Marine Group, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 11/19/2020 | $ | 2,956,135 | 2,927,349 | 2,882,232 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DTZ U.S. Borrower, LLC |
Construction & Building | Term Loan B Add-on | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 11/4/2021 | $ | 1,967,538 | 1,959,096 | 1,957,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Edelman Financial Group, Inc. |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 12/19/2022 | $ | 1,488,750 | 1,462,163 | 1,489,986 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan A | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 7/2/2020 | $ | 501,970 | 487,866 | 115,453 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B (2.00% Cash/6.50% PIK) | Loan | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 8.50 | % | 7/2/2020 | $ | 938,381 | 916,819 | 35,968 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Emerald Performance Materials, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 8/1/2021 | $ | 480,909 | 479,214 | 482,712 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Emerald Performance Materials, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 6.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.75 | % | 8/1/2022 | $ | 500,000 | 498,071 | 497,710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Emerald 2 Limited |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B1A | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5/14/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 993,485 | 925,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Endo International plc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 9/26/2022 | $ | 992,500 | 990,394 | 984,749 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EnergySolutions, LLC |
Environmental Industries | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.75 | % | 5/29/2020 | $ | 795,000 | 784,985 | 800,963 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Engility Corporation |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan B-1 | Loan | 4.25 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.95 | % | 8/12/2020 | $ | 250,000 | 248,811 | 251,770 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Evergreen Acqco 1 LP |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | New Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 7/9/2019 | $ | 957,600 | 956,486 | 886,383 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EWT Holdings III Corp. (fka WTG Holdings III Corp.) |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 1/15/2021 | $ | 1,952,349 | 1,948,532 | 1,954,789 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EWT Holdings III Corp. |
Capital Equipment | Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 1/15/2021 | $ | 995,000 | 986,153 | 996,662 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Extreme Reach, Inc. |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.25 | % | 2/7/2020 | $ | 2,943,750 | 2,914,312 | 2,969,508 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal-Mogul Corporation |
Automotive | Tranche C Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 4/15/2021 | $ | 2,932,500 | 2,922,802 | 2,841,270 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
First Data Corporation |
Financial Intermediaries | First Data T/L Ext (2021) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.70 | % | 3/24/2021 | $ | 1,909,673 | 1,821,389 | 1,917,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
First Eagle Investment Management |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 12/1/2022 | $ | 1,488,750 | 1,462,691 | 1,493,871 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fitness International, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 7/1/2020 | $ | 1,934,146 | 1,908,664 | 1,934,146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FMG Resources (August 2006) Pty LTD (FMG America Finance, Inc.) |
Nonferrous Metals/Minerals | Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 6/28/2019 | $ | 1,207,069 | 1,208,510 | 1,207,371 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Garda World Security Corporation |
Services: Business | Term B Delayed Draw Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 11/6/2020 | $ | 197,592 | 196,978 | 194,012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Garda World Security Corporation |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 11/6/2020 | $ | 772,408 | 770,060 | 758,411 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gardner Denver, Inc. |
High Tech Industries | Initial Dollar Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 7/30/2020 | $ | 2,432,330 | 2,427,218 | 2,363,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gates Global LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 7/5/2021 | $ | 482,906 | 478,077 | 480,139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Amended Tranche B Term Loan | Loan | 2.50 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.25 | % | 3/4/2019 | $ | 2,123,160 | 2,119,206 | 2,025,856 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Tel*Link Corporation |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5/26/2020 | $ | 2,675,183 | 2,668,213 | 2,635,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The |
Chemicals/Plastics | Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 4/30/2019 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,978,530 | 2,013,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Grosvenor Capital Management Holdings, LP |
Brokers/Dealers/Investment Houses | Initial Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 1/4/2021 | $ | 1,014,560 | 1,011,388 | 1,006,109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
GTCR Valor Companies, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 5/17/2023 | $ | 1,496,250 | 1,438,257 | 1,442,954 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (fka Clarke American Corp.) |
Publishing | Tranche B-4 Term Loan | Loan | 5.99 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.99 | % | 8/2/2019 | $ | 2,452,292 | 2,359,268 | 2,439,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Headwaters Incorporated |
Building & Development | Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3/24/2022 | $ | 246,875 | 245,872 | 247,904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc. |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 10/8/2021 | $ | 1,488,750 | 1,435,008 | 1,476,349 |
F-32
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal / Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hemisphere Media Holdings, LLC |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 7/30/2020 | $ | 2,500,000 | 2,511,306 | 2,493,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hercules Achievement Holdings, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 12/10/2021 | $ | 247,481 | 245,345 | 249,585 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hoffmaster Group, Inc. |
Containers/Glass Products | Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 11/10/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 1,003,750 | 999,380 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hostess Brand, LLC |
Beverage, Food & Tobacco | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 8/3/2022 | $ | 1,490,000 | 1,486,283 | 1,497,823 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntsman International LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.70 | % | 4/19/2019 | $ | 2,809,046 | 2,793,042 | 2,813,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/30/2021 | $ | 487,465 | 485,699 | 486,490 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyperion Refinance T/L |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 4/29/2022 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,982,160 | 1,982,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Imagine! Print Solutions, Inc. |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 3/30/2022 | $ | 497,500 | 490,794 | 500,923 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Infor (US), Inc. (fka Lawson Software Inc.) |
Services: Business | Tranche B-5 Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 6/3/2020 | $ | 2,134,125 | 2,122,744 | 2,129,686 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Insight Global |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10/29/2021 | $ | 3,459,111 | 3,442,956 | 3,473,536 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Informatica Corporation |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 8/5/2022 | $ | 495,000 | 493,929 | 483,556 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Crew Group, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term B-1 Loan Retired 03/05/2014 | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3/5/2021 | $ | 948,188 | 948,188 | 606,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Jazz Acquisition, Inc |
Aerospace and Defense | First Lien 6/14 | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 6/19/2021 | $ | 489,091 | 488,214 | 453,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
J.Jill Group, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 5/9/2022 | $ | 987,505 | 983,403 | 965,286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan F-1 | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 11/4/2020 | $ | 2,434,098 | 2,409,562 | 2,390,284 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Koosharem, LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 6.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.50 | % | 5/15/2020 | $ | 2,942,588 | 2,923,892 | 2,648,329 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kraton Polymers, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Initial) | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 1/6/2022 | $ | 2,500,000 | 2,277,562 | 2,513,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Lannett Company, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.38 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.38 | % | 11/25/2022 | $ | 1,925,000 | 1,865,075 | 1,872,063 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Learfield Communications Initial T/L (A-L Parent) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Initial Term Loan (A-L Parent) | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 11/17/2023 | $ | 500,000 | 497,500 | 501,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
LPL Holdings |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan B (2022) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 11/21/2022 | $ | 1,985,000 | 1,967,639 | 1,999,054 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC |
Publishing | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5/4/2022 | $ | 997,500 | 993,085 | 987,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mauser Holdings, Inc. |
Containers/Glass Products | Term Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 7/31/2021 | $ | 490,000 | 488,278 | 491,838 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 1/30/2023 | $ | 1,684,412 | 1,678,497 | 1,696,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Micro Holding Corporation |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 7/8/2021 | $ | 985,413 | 981,373 | 988,803 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Microsemi Corporation |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 1/17/2023 | $ | 892,985 | 868,970 | 897,950 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Midas Intermediate Holdco II, LLC |
Automotive | Term Loan (Initial) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 8/18/2021 | $ | 245,000 | 244,071 | 245,919 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Milk Specialties Company |
Beverage, Food & Tobacco | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 8/16/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,342 | 1,008,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
MSC Software Corporation |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5/29/2020 | $ | 1,974,949 | 1,934,256 | 1,970,012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
MWI Holdings, Inc. |
Capital Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 5.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 6/29/2020 | $ | 2,992,500 | 2,986,899 | 2,992,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
National Veterinary Associates, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 8/14/2021 | $ | 980,038 | 977,191 | 981,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
National Vision, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 5.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.75 | % | 3/11/2022 | $ | 250,000 | 249,780 | 238,437 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
New Media Holdings II T/L (NEW) |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan | Loan | 6.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.25 | % | 6/4/2020 | $ | 2,674,923 | 2,662,001 | 2,644,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
New Millennium Holdco, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 6.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.50 | % | 12/21/2020 | $ | 1,935,123 | 1,771,899 | 1,154,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NorthStar Asset Management Group, Inc. |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.88 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.63 | % | 1/30/2023 | $ | 1,990,000 | 1,926,727 | 1,988,348 |
F-33
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal / Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Novelis, Inc. |
Conglomerate | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 6/2/2022 | $ | 4,735,095 | 4,715,782 | 4,740,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Novetta Solutions |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan (200MM) | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10/16/2022 | $ | 1,985,000 | 1,967,682 | 1,890,712 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Novetta Solutions |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan (2nd Lien) | Loan | 8.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 9.50 | % | 9/29/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,986 | 930,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NPC International, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 12/28/2018 | $ | 477,298 | 477,298 | 477,598 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NVA Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Consumer | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 8/14/2021 | $ | 157,841 | 157,485 | 158,236 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NXT Capital T/L (11/16) |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 11/23/2022 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Om Group |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 10/28/2021 | $ | 994,987 | 903,045 | 991,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ON Semiconductor Corporation |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.95 | % | 3/31/2023 | $ | 500,000 | 499,320 | 502,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Onex Carestream Finance LP |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan (First Lien 2013) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 6/7/2019 | $ | 3,668,306 | 3,659,647 | 3,232,695 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
OnexYork Acquisition Co |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 490,000 | 487,264 | 452,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
OpenLink International, LLC |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 6.50 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.75 | % | 7/29/2019 | $ | 2,921,492 | 2,920,807 | 2,947,055 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. (Wok Acquisition Corp.) |
Food/Drug Retailers | Term Borrowing | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/24/2019 | $ | 1,421,386 | 1,417,039 | 1,400,065 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
P2 Upstream Acquisition Co. (P2 Upstream Canada BC ULC) |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 10/30/2020 | $ | 972,500 | 969,216 | 914,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Petsmart, Inc. (Argos Merger Sub, Inc.) |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3/11/2022 | $ | 985,000 | 980,220 | 987,728 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
PGX Holdings, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 9/29/2020 | $ | 911,429 | 905,316 | 911,046 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Planet Fitness Holdings LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 3/31/2021 | $ | 2,398,337 | 2,390,948 | 2,392,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Polycom Term Loan (9/16) |
Telecommunications | Term Loan | Loan | 6.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.50 | % | 9/27/2023 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,972,500 | 1,966,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 7/1/2019 | $ | 3,392,467 | 3,396,014 | 3,389,651 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Presidio, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 2/2/2022 | $ | 2,385,390 | 2,331,907 | 2,398,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Security Services (Protection One) |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 7/1/2021 | $ | 1,985,025 | 1,977,124 | 1,996,876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ranpak Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 931,264 | 928,935 | 923,115 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ranpak Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 7.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 8.25 | % | 10/3/2022 | $ | 500,000 | 498,073 | 470,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redtop Acquisitions Limited |
Electronics/Electric | Initial Dollar Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 12/3/2020 | $ | 486,259 | 484,109 | 485,044 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Regal Cinemas Corporation |
Services: Consumer | Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.50 | % | 4/1/2022 | $ | 495,009 | 493,772 | 496,868 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Now Group, Inc |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 3/18/2021 | $ | 2,042,890 | 2,034,414 | 1,981,603 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rexnord LLC/RBS Global, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 8/21/2020 | $ | 1,540,540 | 1,541,627 | 1,544,607 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reynolds Group Holdings Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Incremental U.S. Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 2/6/2023 | $ | 1,765,548 | 1,765,548 | 1,773,458 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rovi Solutions Corporation / Rovi Guides, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Tranche B-3 Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 7/2/2021 | $ | 1,466,250 | 1,461,232 | 1,469,549 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Adhesives and Sealants |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 6/20/2022 | $ | 493,750 | 491,669 | 496,219 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Adhesives and Sealants |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 7.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 8.50 | % | 6/19/2023 | $ | 500,000 | 496,621 | 493,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
RPI Finance Trust |
Financial Intermediaries | Term B-4 Term Loan | Loan | 2.50 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.20 | % | 10/14/2022 | $ | 2,561,167 | 2,561,167 | 2,581,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Russell Investment Management T/L B |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.75 | % | 6/1/2023 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,879,384 | 2,006,232 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sable International Finance Ltd |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 4.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 12/2/2022 | $ | 825,000 | 809,615 | 831,922 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sable International Finance Ltd |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B2 | Loan | 4.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 12/2/2022 | $ | 675,000 | 662,412 | 680,663 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SBP Holdings LP |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 3/27/2021 | $ | 975,000 | 971,747 | 819,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Scientific Games International, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan B2 | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 982,500 | 973,672 | 990,684 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SCS Holdings (Sirius Computer) |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 10/31/2022 | $ | 1,977,528 | 1,942,888 | 1,987,416 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Seadrill Operating LP |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 2/21/2021 | $ | 979,849 | 921,734 | 554,428 |
F-34
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal / Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shearers Foods LLC |
Food Services | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.94 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.94 | % | 6/30/2021 | $ | 980,000 | 978,146 | 980,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sitel Worldwide |
Telecommunications | Term Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 9/18/2021 | $ | 1,980,000 | 1,963,403 | 1,968,239 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sonneborn, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 12/10/2020 | $ | 208,512 | 208,136 | 208,860 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sonneborn, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Initial US Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 12/10/2020 | $ | 1,181,569 | 1,179,439 | 1,183,542 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sophia, L.P. |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan (Closing Date) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 9/30/2022 | $ | 1,965,897 | 1,957,501 | 1,967,136 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SourceHOV LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 6.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.75 | % | 10/31/2019 | $ | 1,862,500 | 1,826,426 | 1,642,259 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SRAM, LLC |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4/10/2020 | $ | 2,772,070 | 2,765,804 | 2,723,559 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Steak n Shake Operations, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 3/19/2021 | $ | 925,673 | 919,596 | 918,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SuperMedia Inc. (fka Idearc Inc.) |
Publishing | Loan | Loan | 8.60 | % | 3.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 11.60 | % | 12/30/2016 | $ | 200,478 | 200,472 | 77,685 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Survey Sampling International |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 12/16/2020 | $ | 2,728,677 | 2,713,545 | 2,715,033 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sybil Finance BV |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 8/3/2022 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,154 | 1,008,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Syniverse Holdings, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Initial Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4/23/2019 | $ | 468,977 | 466,744 | 416,386 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TaxACT, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 1/3/2023 | $ | 1,350,000 | 1,313,620 | 1,353,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tectum Holdings, Inc. |
Transportation | Delayed Draw Term Loan (Initial) | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 8/24/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,340 | 1,005,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TGI Fridays, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 7/15/2020 | $ | 1,651,816 | 1,648,636 | 1,629,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Townsquare Media, Inc. |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 4/1/2022 | $ | 932,522 | 928,849 | 932,522 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TPF II Power LLC and TPF II Covert Midco LLC |
Utilities | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 10/2/2021 | $ | 1,413,873 | 1,362,183 | 1,420,235 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TransDigm, Inc. |
Aerospace and Defense | Tranche C Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 2/28/2020 | $ | 4,244,222 | 4,249,544 | 4,249,952 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Travel Leaders Group, LLC |
Hotel, Gaming and Leisure | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 12/7/2020 | $ | 2,629,084 | 2,615,196 | 2,603,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Trugreen Limited Partnership |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 4/13/2023 | $ | 498,750 | 491,925 | 502,491 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Twin River Management Group, Inc. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 7/10/2020 | $ | 864,021 | 865,348 | 868,886 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Univar Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 7/1/2022 | $ | 2,970,000 | 2,957,757 | 2,979,296 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Univision Communications Inc. |
Telecommunications | Replacement First-Lien Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3/1/2020 | $ | 2,893,389 | 2,883,224 | 2,892,347 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. |
Drugs | Series D2 Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 2/13/2019 | $ | 2,468,721 | 2,460,512 | 2,445,588 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Verint Systems Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.50 | % | 9/6/2019 | $ | 1,008,871 | 1,006,624 | 1,014,551 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vistra Operations (Tex Operations) Exit T/L B |
Services: Business | Exit Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 8/4/2023 | $ | 814,286 | 814,286 | 821,069 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vistra Operations (Tex Operations) Exit T/L C |
Services: Business | Exit Term Loan C | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 8/4/2023 | $ | 185,714 | 185,714 | 187,261 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vizient Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 2/13/2023 | $ | 879,853 | 856,015 | 887,552 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vouvray US Finance |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 6/27/2021 | $ | 488,750 | 487,038 | 489,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Inventory Service |
Services: Business | U.S. Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 12/20/2018 | $ | 1,731,518 | 1,741,101 | 1,294,309 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Western Digital Corporation |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B (USD) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 5/1/2023 | $ | 1,596,000 | 1,585,323 | 1,613,955 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Windstream Services, LLC |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B6 | Loan | 4.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 3/29/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,071 | 1,001,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Xerox Business Services T/L B (Conduent) |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 11/22/2023 | $ | 500,000 | 487,536 | 500,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ZEP, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 6/27/2022 | $ | 2,962,500 | 2,950,232 | 2,973,609 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Zest Holdings 1st Lien T/L (2014 Replacement) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 8/17/2020 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,127 | 1,002,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 298,082,915 | $ | 289,998,852 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
F-35
Principal | Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Bank Money Market(a) |
|
$ | 16,002,200 | $ | 16,002,200 | $ | 16,002,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ | 16,002,200 | $ | 16,002,200 | $ | 16,002,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Included within cash and cash equivalents in Saratoga CLOs Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of November 30, 2016. |
F-36
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1 Ltd.
Schedule of Investments
February 29, 2016
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
A-1 Preferred Shares | Equity | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6,692 | $ | 669,214 | $ | 1,673 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
A-2 Preferred Shares | Equity | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 18,975 | 1,897,538 | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Millennium Holdco, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Common Stock | Equity | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 14,813 | 964,466 | 190,095 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 Hour Holdings III, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 5/28/2021 | $ | 492,500 | 488,586 | 455,154 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acosta Holdco, Inc. |
Media | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 9/26/2021 | $ | 1,972,936 | 1,959,834 | 1,855,389 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Aspen Dental Management, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan Initial | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 4/29/2022 | $ | 497,500 | 495,228 | 495,221 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc. |
Services: Business | Delayed Draw Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 7/25/2021 | $ | 2,471,231 | 2,468,039 | 2,342,826 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Agrofresh, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 7/30/2021 | $ | 1,990,000 | 1,980,704 | 1,935,275 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Aegis Toxicology Science Corporation |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term B Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 2/24/2021 | $ | 985,000 | 985,000 | 797,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Akorn, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 4/16/2021 | $ | 398,056 | 396,681 | 396,066 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Albertsons LLC |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B-4 | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 8/25/2021 | $ | 3,384,425 | 3,367,410 | 3,302,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alere Inc. (fka IM US Holdings, LLC) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/20/2022 | $ | 927,265 | 925,091 | 925,365 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alion Science and Technology Corporation |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 8/19/2021 | $ | 2,985,000 | 2,971,074 | 2,824,555 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alliance Healthcare Services, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/3/2019 | $ | 994,856 | 990,161 | 906,981 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alliant Holdings I, LLC |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 8/12/2022 | $ | 995,000 | 992,679 | 960,921 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alvogen Pharma US, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 4/4/2022 | $ | 480,447 | 478,240 | 456,425 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
American Beacon Advisors, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 4/30/2022 | $ | 248,749 | 247,612 | 244,190 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | LC-2 Facility | Loan | 3.50 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.12 | % | 7/26/2016 | $ | 9,447 | 9,445 | 9,305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | LC-3 Facility | Loan | 3.50 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.12 | % | 7/26/2016 | $ | 5,244 | 5,244 | 5,166 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | U.S. Term F Loan | Loan | 2.50 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.25 | % | 2/24/2021 | $ | 3,150,423 | 3,150,423 | 3,126,133 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Asurion, LLC (fka Asurion Corporation) |
Insurance | Incremental Tranche B-1 Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5/24/2019 | $ | 2,596,480 | 2,573,245 | 2,441,237 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Asurion, LLC (fka Asurion Corporation) |
Insurance | Term Loan B4 (First Lien) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 8/4/2022 | $ | 2,478,125 | 2,466,303 | 2,270,582 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Auction.com, LLC |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 5/13/2019 | $ | 2,522,992 | 2,522,722 | 2,491,455 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Avantor Performance Materials Holdings, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 6/24/2017 | $ | 2,156,953 | 2,153,896 | 2,135,384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Bass Pro Group, LLC |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 6/5/2020 | $ | 1,488,750 | 1,485,895 | 1,397,564 |
F-37
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belmond Interfin Ltd. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3/19/2021 | $ | 491,249 | 489,361 | 477,127 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Berry Plastics Corporation |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term E Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 1/6/2021 | $ | 1,314,499 | 1,305,069 | 1,291,903 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. |
Food/Drug Retailers | New 2013 (November) Replacement Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 9/26/2019 | $ | 1,476,196 | 1,475,409 | 1,401,161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Coat Systems |
Technology | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 5/20/2022 | $ | 997,500 | 995,159 | 945,131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BMC Software |
Technology | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 9/10/2020 | $ | 1,979,798 | 1,926,080 | 1,571,821 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Brickman Group Holdings, Inc. |
Brokers/Dealers/Investment Houses | Initial Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 12/18/2020 | $ | 1,476,212 | 1,464,327 | 1,426,390 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Brock Holdings III, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.50 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 3/16/2017 | $ | 1,917,168 | 1,924,101 | 1,802,138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term B-2 Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 8/13/2021 | $ | 1,861,667 | 1,853,426 | 1,845,843 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BWAY Holding Company |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 8/14/2020 | $ | 985,000 | 976,335 | 930,826 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Caesars Entertainment Corp. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term B-7 Loan | Loan | 8.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 3.50 | % | 13.25 | % | 3/1/2017 | $ | 995,000 | 991,037 | 814,656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Camp International Holding Company |
Aerospace and Defense | 2013 Replacement Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 5/31/2019 | $ | 1,940,113 | 1,940,984 | 1,806,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Automotive L.P. |
Conglomerate | Tranche B-1 Term Loan Facility | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4/10/2019 | $ | 2,051,828 | 2,055,060 | 2,044,564 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalent Pharma Solutions, Inc |
Drugs | Initial Term B Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 5/20/2021 | $ | 492,501 | 490,549 | 487,271 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cengage Learning Acquisitions, Inc. |
Publishing | Term Loan | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 3/31/2020 | $ | 2,647,871 | 2,670,807 | 2,539,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC |
Cable and Satellite Television | Term F Loan | Loan | 2.25 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.00 | % | 12/31/2020 | $ | 2,628,783 | 2,621,343 | 2,566,823 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term G Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 12/31/2019 | $ | 1,022,569 | 994,876 | 974,212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term H Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 1/27/2021 | $ | 1,881,500 | 1,828,566 | 1,785,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cinedigm Digital Funding I, LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 2/28/2018 | $ | 298,828 | 297,362 | 295,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CITGO Petroleum Corporation |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 7/29/2021 | $ | 1,984,975 | 1,962,423 | 1,865,876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Communications Sales & Leasing, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 10/24/2022 | $ | 1,990,000 | 1,978,594 | 1,847,596 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CommScope, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 12/29/2022 | $ | 498,750 | 497,568 | 494,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Aerospace Manufacturing, LLC |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 8/11/2022 | $ | 1,437,500 | 1,430,556 | 1,329,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Concordia Healthcare Corp |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 10/21/2021 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,894,483 | 1,920,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CPI Acquisition Inc. |
Technology | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 8/17/2022 | $ | 1,436,782 | 1,415,977 | 1,396,667 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CPI International Acquisition, Inc. (f/k/a Catalyst Holdings, Inc.) |
Electronics/Electric | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 11/17/2017 | $ | 1,564,182 | 1,564,182 | 1,501,615 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Crosby US Acquisition Corp. |
Industrial Equipment | Initial Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 11/23/2020 | $ | 735,000 | 734,245 | 536,550 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CT Technologies Intermediate Hldgs, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 12/1/2021 | $ | 1,485,038 | 1,471,665 | 1,433,061 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Culligan International Company |
Conglomerate | Dollar Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.50 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 12/19/2017 | $ | 771,625 | 742,910 | 721,469 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Culligan International Company |
Conglomerate | Dollar Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 8.00 | % | 1.50 | % | 0.00 | % | 9.50 | % | 6/19/2018 | $ | 783,162 | 754,065 | 734,214 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulus Media Holdings Inc. |
Broadcast Radio and Television | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 12/23/2020 | $ | 470,093 | 466,690 | 304,973 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DAE Aviation (StandardAero) |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 7/7/2022 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,985,759 | 1,970,063 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DCS Business Services, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries | Term B Loan | Loan | 7.25 | % | 1.50 | % | 0.00 | % | 8.75 | % | 3/19/2018 | $ | 2,409,739 | 2,397,948 | 2,409,739 |
F-38
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dell International LLC |
Technology | Term Loan B2 | Loan | 3.25 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4/29/2020 | $ | 2,904,989 | 2,892,348 | 2,889,854 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Delta 2 (Lux) S.a.r.l. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan B-3 | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 7/30/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,870 | 925,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deluxe Entertainment Service Group, Inc. |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 5.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 2/28/2020 | $ | 1,882,983 | 1,884,279 | 1,751,174 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Diamond Resorts International |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 5/7/2021 | $ | 926,971 | 923,222 | 897,614 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Diamond Resorts International |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan (Add-On) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 5/7/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 980,687 | 968,330 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DJO Finance, LLC |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/8/2020 | $ | 497,500 | 495,435 | 478,222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DPX Holdings B.V. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan 2015 Incr Dollar | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 3/11/2021 | $ | 2,955,000 | 2,948,456 | 2,799,863 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Drew Marine Group, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 11/19/2020 | $ | 2,472,161 | 2,445,601 | 2,299,110 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DTZ U.S. Borrower, LLC |
Construction & Building | Term Loan B Add-on | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 11/4/2021 | $ | 2,985,000 | 2,970,317 | 2,869,331 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Edelman Financial Group, Inc. |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 12/19/2022 | $ | 1,500,000 | 1,470,617 | 1,459,695 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan A | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 7/2/2020 | $ | 501,970 | 485,313 | 160,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B (2.00% Cash/6.50% PIK) | Loan | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 8.50 | % | 7/2/2020 | $ | 893,447 | 867,647 | 56,582 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Emerald Performance Materials, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 8/1/2021 | $ | 484,659 | 482,690 | 473,148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Emerald Performance Materials, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 6.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.75 | % | 8/1/2022 | $ | 500,000 | 497,844 | 468,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Emerald 2 Limited |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B1A | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5/14/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 991,762 | 866,670 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Endo International plc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 9/26/2022 | $ | 1,000,000 | 997,602 | 987,780 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EnergySolutions, LLC |
Environmental Industries | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.75 | % | 5/29/2020 | $ | 937,857 | 923,660 | 731,528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Evergreen Acqco 1 LP |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | New Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 7/9/2019 | $ | 965,081 | 963,406 | 719,951 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EWT Holdings III Corp. (fka WTG Holdings III Corp.) |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 1/15/2021 | $ | 1,967,406 | 1,962,950 | 1,908,383 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal-Mogul Corporation |
Automotive | Tranche C Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 4/15/2021 | $ | 2,955,000 | 2,943,580 | 2,345,530 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
First Data Corporation |
Financial Intermediaries | First Data Corp T/L (2018 New Dollar) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.12 | % | 3/23/2018 | $ | 2,790,451 | 2,748,229 | 2,752,780 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
First Data Corporation |
Financial Intermediaries | First Data T/L Ext (2021) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.62 | % | 3/24/2021 | $ | 2,111,028 | 2,034,284 | 2,077,779 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
First Eagle Investment Management |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 12/1/2022 | $ | 1,500,000 | 1,470,946 | 1,412,504 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fitness International, LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 7/1/2020 | $ | 1,976,234 | 1,945,935 | 1,850,249 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FMG Resources (August 2006) Pty LTD (FMG America Finance, Inc.) |
Nonferrous Metals/Minerals | Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/28/2019 | $ | 1,962,387 | 1,962,515 | 1,504,738 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Garda World Security Corporation |
Services: Business | Term B Delayed Draw Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 11/6/2020 | $ | 199,120 | 198,391 | 187,344 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Garda World Security Corporation |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 11/6/2020 | $ | 778,380 | 775,586 | 732,346 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gardner Denver, Inc. |
High Tech Industries | Initial Dollar Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 7/30/2020 | $ | 2,451,137 | 2,445,005 | 2,016,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gates Global LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 7/5/2021 | $ | 493,750 | 488,813 | 433,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Generac Power Systems, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan B | Loan | 2.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.50 | % | 5/31/2020 | $ | 693,858 | 684,537 | 676,511 |
F-39
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Amended Tranche B Term Loan | Loan | 2.50 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.25 | % | 3/4/2019 | $ | 4,131,271 | 4,121,165 | 4,012,497 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Tel*Link Corporation |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5/26/2020 | $ | 2,725,318 | 2,717,647 | 2,237,023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The |
Chemicals/Plastics | Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 4/30/2019 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,974,077 | 2,005,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Grosvenor Capital Management Holdings, LP |
Brokers/Dealers/Investment Houses | Initial Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 1/4/2021 | $ | 1,264,036 | 1,259,418 | 1,191,354 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
GTCR Valor Companies, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 6/1/2021 | $ | 1,974,982 | 1,941,456 | 1,959,340 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (fka Clarke American Corp.) |
Publishing | Tranche B-4 Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 8/2/2019 | $ | 475,000 | 473,378 | 421,561 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
HCA Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Tranche B-4 Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.37 | % | 5/1/2018 | $ | 2,119,664 | 2,053,127 | 2,116,294 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Headwaters Incorporated |
Building & Development | Term Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 3/24/2022 | $ | 248,750 | 247,628 | 248,285 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hercules Achievement Holdings, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 12/10/2021 | $ | 249,370 | 246,940 | 244,929 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hertz Corporation, The |
Automotive | Tranche B-1 Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 3/12/2018 | $ | 2,910,000 | 2,933,230 | 2,879,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hoffmaster Group, Inc. |
Containers/Glass Products | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 5/8/2020 | $ | 1,970,000 | 1,955,325 | 1,915,825 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hostess Brand, LLC |
Beverage, Food & Tobacco | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 8/3/2022 | $ | 997,500 | 995,241 | 983,784 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntsman International LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.62 | % | 4/19/2019 | $ | 3,840,541 | 3,814,577 | 3,727,245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/30/2021 | $ | 491,196 | 489,277 | 465,757 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Infor (US), Inc. (fka Lawson Software Inc.) |
Services: Business | Tranche B-5 Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 6/3/2020 | $ | 2,188,296 | 2,174,333 | 2,015,049 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Insight Global |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10/29/2021 | $ | 1,979,592 | 1,971,967 | 1,961,439 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Informatica Corporation |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 8/5/2022 | $ | 498,750 | 497,554 | 468,411 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Crew Group, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term B-1 Loan Retired 03/05/2014 | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3/5/2021 | $ | 955,481 | 955,481 | 639,379 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Jazz Acquisition, Inc |
Aerospace and Defense | First Lien 6/14 | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 6/19/2021 | $ | 492,727 | 491,745 | 434,832 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
J.Jill Group, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 5/9/2022 | $ | 995,000 | 990,362 | 925,350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Dollar Term D-1 Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 5/4/2018 | $ | 2,452,586 | 2,436,004 | 2,392,645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Koosharem, LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 6.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.50 | % | 5/15/2020 | $ | 2,965,050 | 2,942,458 | 2,683,370 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kraton Polymers, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Initial) | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 1/6/2022 | $ | 2,500,000 | 2,252,500 | 2,250,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
LPL Holdings |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan B (2022) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 11/21/2022 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,980,543 | 1,900,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mauser Holdings, Inc. |
Containers/Glass Products | Term Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 7/31/2021 | $ | 493,750 | 491,750 | 475,234 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term B Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 1/28/2020 | $ | 486,250 | 486,250 | 479,792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B-2 | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 1/28/2020 | $ | 1,212,794 | 1,208,220 | 1,201,042 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Micro Holding Corp. |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 7/8/2021 | $ | 992,447 | 987,851 | 950,268 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Microsemi Corporation |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 1/15/2023 | $ | 2,183,824 | 2,119,162 | 2,180,177 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Midas Intermediate Holdco II, LLC |
Automotive | Term Loan (Initial) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 8/18/2021 | $ | 246,875 | 245,802 | 244,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
MPH Acquisition Holdings, LLC |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 3/31/2021 | $ | 376,136 | 375,400 | 366,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
MSC Software Corporation |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5/29/2020 | $ | 985,000 | 977,601 | 886,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
National Veterinary Associates, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 8/14/2021 | $ | 987,526 | 984,296 | 959,549 |
F-40
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Vision, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 5.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.75 | % | 3/11/2022 | $ | 250,000 | 249,729 | 218,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Neptune Finco (CSC Holdings) |
Cable and Satellite Television | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 10/7/2022 | $ | 1,000,000 | 985,784 | 989,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
New Millennium Holdco |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 6.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.50 | % | 12/21/2020 | $ | 2,007,042 | 1,811,375 | 1,822,655 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Nortek, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan B | Loan | 2.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.50 | % | 10/30/2020 | $ | 985,022 | 974,747 | 939,464 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc. |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.88 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.63 | % | 1/30/2023 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,930,000 | 1,950,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Novelis, Inc. |
Conglomerate | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 6/2/2022 | $ | 4,771,058 | 4,749,389 | 4,440,090 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Novetta Solutions |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan (200MM) | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10/16/2022 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,980,636 | 1,940,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Novetta Solutions |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan (2nd Lien) | Loan | 8.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 9.50 | % | 9/29/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,269 | 950,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NPC International, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 12/28/2018 | $ | 481,250 | 481,250 | 472,829 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NRG Energy, Inc. |
Utilities | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 2.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 2.75 | % | 7/2/2018 | $ | 3,821,925 | 3,808,282 | 3,751,449 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Numericable |
Broadcast Radio and Television | Term Loan B-5 | Loan | 3.81 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.56 | % | 7/31/2022 | $ | 997,500 | 995,164 | 953,171 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NuSil Technology LLC. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 4/7/2017 | $ | 789,045 | 789,045 | 774,645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Onex Carestream Finance LP |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan (First Lien 2013) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 6/7/2019 | $ | 3,832,558 | 3,821,232 | 3,244,912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
OnexYork Acquisition Co |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 493,749 | 490,644 | 459,435 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
OpenLink International, LLC |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 10/30/2017 | $ | 2,944,496 | 2,943,282 | 2,811,994 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. (Wok Acquisition Corp.) |
Food/Drug Retailers | Term Borrowing | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 6/24/2019 | $ | 1,432,750 | 1,427,110 | 1,336,039 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
P2 Upstream Acquisition Co. (P2 Upstream Canada BC ULC) |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 10/30/2020 | $ | 980,000 | 976,133 | 774,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Penn Products Terminal, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 4/13/2022 | $ | 248,125 | 246,994 | 218,350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
PetCo Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B-1 | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 1/15/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 980,217 | 978,590 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
PetCo Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B-2 | Loan | 5.00 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.62 | % | 1/15/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 980,216 | 978,960 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Petsmart, Inc. (Argos Merger Sub, Inc.) |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 3/11/2022 | $ | 992,500 | 987,862 | 961,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
PGX Holdings, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 9/29/2020 | $ | 954,643 | 947,123 | 941,917 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (Jaguar Holdings, LLC) |
Conglomerate | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 8/18/2022 | $ | 1,920,848 | 1,911,850 | 1,872,346 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Phillips-Medisize Corporation |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 6/16/2021 | $ | 492,500 | 490,535 | 458,025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Physio-Control International, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 6/6/2022 | $ | 498,750 | 496,371 | 498,127 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC |
Food Products | New Term Loan G | Loan | 2.25 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.00 | % | 4/29/2020 | $ | 2,581,332 | 2,577,286 | 2,553,737 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Planet Fitness Holdings LLC |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies |
Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 3/31/2021 | $ | 2,417,118 | 2,410,079 | 2,368,776 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 7/1/2019 | $ | 724,167 | 721,080 | 716,020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Presidio, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 2/2/2022 | $ | 1,902,292 | 1,846,615 | 1,816,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Security Services (Protection One) |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 7/1/2021 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,985,640 | 1,924,178 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ranpak Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 938,354 | 936,008 | 886,745 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ranpak Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 7.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 8.25 | % | 10/3/2022 | $ | 500,000 | 497,866 | 400,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redtop Acquisitions Limited |
Electronics/Electric | Initial Dollar Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 12/3/2020 | $ | 490,000 | 487,461 | 482,444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Regal Cinemas Corporation |
Services: Consumer | Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 4/1/2022 | $ | 497,500 | 496,320 | 496,256 |
F-41
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Now Group, Inc |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 3/18/2021 | $ | 2,058,445 | 2,048,627 | 1,996,692 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rexnord LLC/RBS Global, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 8/21/2020 | $ | 1,630,123 | 1,631,387 | 1,557,647 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reynolds Group Holdings Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Incremental U.S. Term Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 12/1/2018 | $ | 1,910,551 | 1,910,551 | 1,902,946 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Riverbed Technology, Inc. |
Technology | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 2/25/2022 | $ | 992,500 | 988,224 | 970,873 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rocket Software, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 2/8/2018 | $ | 1,901,835 | 1,889,759 | 1,889,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rovi Solutions Corporation / Rovi Guides, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Tranche B-3 Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 7/2/2021 | $ | 1,477,500 | 1,471,640 | 1,422,094 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Adhesives and Sealants |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 6/20/2022 | $ | 497,500 | 495,187 | 479,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Adhesives and Sealants |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 7.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 8.50 | % | 6/19/2023 | $ | 500,000 | 496,388 | 478,335 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
RPI Finance Trust |
Financial Intermediaries | Term B-4 Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.50 | % | 11/9/2020 | $ | 5,155,193 | 5,155,193 | 5,132,665 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sable International Finance Ltd |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 4.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 12/2/2022 | $ | 825,000 | 808,500 | 800,770 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sable International Finance Ltd |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B2 | Loan | 4.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 12/2/2022 | $ | 675,000 | 661,500 | 655,175 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SBP Holdings LP |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 3/27/2021 | $ | 982,500 | 978,645 | 707,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Scientific Games International, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan B2 | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 990,000 | 981,872 | 904,613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SCS Holdings (Sirius Computer) |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10/30/2022 | $ | 1,977,528 | 1,939,305 | 1,937,978 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Seadrill Operating LP |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 2/21/2021 | $ | 987,406 | 919,799 | 407,305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sensus USA Inc. (fka Sensus Metering Systems) |
Utilities | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 5/9/2017 | $ | 1,905,121 | 1,902,477 | 1,826,534 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ServiceMaster Company, The |
Conglomerate | Tranche B Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 7/1/2021 | $ | 1,975,000 | 1,959,254 | 1,956,889 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shearers Foods LLC |
Food Services | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.94 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.94 | % | 6/30/2021 | $ | 987,500 | 985,421 | 952,938 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sitel Worldwide |
Telecommunications | Term Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 9/18/2021 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,976,131 | 1,931,160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sonneborn, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 12/10/2020 | $ | 222,750 | 222,282 | 220,801 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sonneborn, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Initial US Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 12/10/2020 | $ | 1,262,250 | 1,259,600 | 1,251,205 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sophia, L.P. |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan (Closing Date) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 9/30/2022 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,985,507 | 1,911,469 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SourceHOV LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan B (First Lien) | Loan | 6.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.75 | % | 10/31/2019 | $ | 1,937,500 | 1,891,680 | 1,541,281 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SRAM, LLC |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4/10/2020 | $ | 2,904,577 | 2,896,630 | 2,207,479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Staples, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) | Term Loan 1/16 | Loan | 4.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 4/23/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,308 | 992,130 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Steak n Shake Operations, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 3/19/2021 | $ | 965,341 | 957,952 | 946,034 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SuperMedia Inc. (fka Idearc Inc.) |
Publishing | Loan | Loan | 8.60 | % | 3.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 11.60 | % | 12/30/2016 | $ | 222,900 | 220,105 | 67,520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Survey Sampling International |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 12/16/2020 | $ | 992,500 | 990,554 | 970,169 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sybil Finance BV |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 3/20/2020 | $ | 1,272,143 | 1,270,803 | 1,253,061 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Syniverse Holdings, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Initial Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4/23/2019 | $ | 479,913 | 476,927 | 311,944 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TaxACT, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 1/3/2023 | $ | 1,860,000 | 1,805,035 | 1,804,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TGI Fridays, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 7/15/2020 | $ | 1,651,816 | 1,647,936 | 1,636,669 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Townsquare Media, Inc. |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 4/1/2022 | $ | 932,522 | 928,333 | 915,624 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TPF II Power LLC and TPF II Covert Midco LLC |
Utilities | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.50 | % | 10/2/2021 | $ | 1,491,826 | 1,433,943 | 1,396,722 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TransDigm, Inc. |
Aerospace and Defense | Tranche C Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 2/28/2020 | $ | 4,277,294 | 4,283,815 | 4,148,975 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Travel Leaders Group, LLC |
Hotel, Gaming and Leisure | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 12/7/2020 | $ | 1,946,300 | 1,939,729 | 1,917,107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tricorbraun, Inc. (fka Kranson Industries, Inc.) |
Containers/Glass Products | Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 5/3/2018 | $ | 1,836,625 | 1,831,636 | 1,776,935 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Truven Health Analytics Inc. (fka Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc.) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | New Tranche B Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.50 | % | 6/6/2019 | $ | 482,603 | 476,598 | 480,494 |
F-42
Issuer Name |
Industry |
Asset Name |
Asset Type |
Spread | LIBOR Floor |
PIK | Current Rate (All In) |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Twin River Management Group, Inc. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.25 | % | 7/10/2020 | $ | 886,192 | 887,853 | 875,673 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Security Associates Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Delayed Draw Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 7/28/2017 | $ | 156,888 | 156,328 | 155,973 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Security Associates Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 7/28/2017 | $ | 921,426 | 918,393 | 916,054 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Univar Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 7/1/2022 | $ | 2,992,500 | 2,978,573 | 2,840,810 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Univision Communications Inc. |
Telecommunications | Replacement First-Lien Term Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3/1/2020 | $ | 2,916,556 | 2,903,859 | 2,832,705 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. |
Drugs | Series D2 Term Loan B | Loan | 2.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.50 | % | 2/13/2019 | $ | 2,545,588 | 2,539,315 | 2,385,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verint Systems Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 2.75 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.50 | % | 9/6/2019 | $ | 1,014,058 | 1,011,203 | 1,005,692 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertafore, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 3.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.25 | % | 10/3/2019 | $ | 2,484,603 | 2,484,603 | 2,452,775 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vizient Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 2/13/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 970,144 | 993,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vouvray US Finance |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.75 | % | 6/27/2021 | $ | 492,500 | 490,508 | 478,134 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Inventory Service |
Services: Business | U.S. Term Loan (First Lien) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 12/20/2018 | $ | 1,736,392 | 1,749,291 | 1,475,934 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
West Corporation |
Telecommunications | Term B-10 Loan | Loan | 2.50 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.00 | % | 3.25 | % | 6/30/2018 | $ | 2,534,892 | 2,558,782 | 2,490,861 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ZEP Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.75 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 6/27/2022 | $ | 2,985,000 | 2,971,139 | 2,932,763 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 303,643,756 | $ | 284,844,789 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Bank Money Market(a) |
|
$ | 2,349,633 | $ | 2,349,633 | $ | 2,349,633 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ | 2,349,633 | $ | 2,349,633 | $ | 2,349,633 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Included within cash and cash equivalents in Saratoga CLOs Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of February 29, 2016. |
F-43
Note 5. Agreements and Related Party Transactions
On July 30, 2010, the Company entered into the Management Agreement with our Manager. The initial term of the Management Agreement was two years, with automatic, one-year renewals at the end of each year, subject to certain approvals by our board of directors and/or the Companys stockholders. On July 7, 2016, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Management Agreement for an additional one-year term. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, our Manager implements our business strategy on a day-to-day basis and performs certain services for us, subject to oversight by our board of directors. Our Manager is responsible for, among other duties, determining investment criteria, sourcing, analyzing and executing investments transactions, asset sales, financings and performing asset management duties. Under the Management Agreement, we have agreed to pay our Manager a management fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of a base management fee and an incentive fee.
The base management fee of 1.75% is calculated based on the average value of our gross assets (other than cash or cash equivalents, but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) at the end of the two most recently completed fiscal quarters.
The incentive fee consists of the following two parts:
The first, payable quarterly in arrears, equals 20.0% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets at the end of the immediately preceding quarter, that exceeds a 1.875% quarterly hurdle rate measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter, subject to a catch-up provision. Under this provision, in any fiscal quarter, our Manager receives no incentive fee unless our pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds the hurdle rate of 1.875%. Our Manager will receive 100.0% of pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.344% in any fiscal quarter; and 20.0% of the amount of the our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 2.344% in any fiscal quarter. There is no accumulation of amounts on the hurdle rate from quarter to quarter, and accordingly there is no claw back of amounts previously paid if subsequent quarters are below the quarterly hurdle rate, and there is no delay of payment if prior quarters are below the quarterly hurdle rate.
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Management Agreement) and equals 20.0% of our incentive fee capital gains, which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from May 31, 2010 through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee. Importantly, the capital gains portion of the incentive fee is based on realized gains and realized and unrealized losses from May 31, 2010. Therefore, realized and unrealized losses incurred prior to such time will not be taken into account when calculating the capital gains portion of the incentive fee, and our Manager will be entitled to 20.0% of incentive fee capital gains that arise after May 31, 2010. In addition, for the purpose of the incentive fee capital gains calculations, the cost basis for computing realized gains and losses on investments held by us as of May 31, 2010 will equal the fair value of such investments as of such date.
For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the Company incurred $1.2 million and $1.1 million in base management fees, respectively. For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the Company incurred $0.8 million and $0.2 million in incentive fees related to pre-incentive fee net investment income, respectively. For the three months ended November 30, 2016, there was a reduction of $0.4 million in incentive fees related to capital gains. For the three months ended November 30, 2015, we accrued $0.2 million in incentive fees related to capital gains. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the Company incurred $3.6 million and $3.4 million in base management fees, respectively. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the Company incurred $2.2 million and $1.7 million in incentive fees related to pre-incentive fee net investment income, respectively. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we accrued $0.1 million and $0.5 million in incentive fees related to capital gains, respectively. The accrual is calculated using both realized and
F-44
unrealized capital gains for the period. The actual incentive fee related to capital gains will be determined and payable in arrears at the end of the fiscal year and will include only realized capital gains for the period. As of November 30, 2016, the base management fees accrual was $1.2 million and the incentive fees accrual was $4.7 million and is included in base management and incentive fees payable in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. As of February 29, 2016, the base management fees accrual was $1.2 million and the incentive fees accrual was $4.4 million and is included in base management and incentive fees payable in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities.
On July 30, 2010, the Company entered into a separate administration agreement (the Administration Agreement) with our Manager, pursuant to which our Manager, as our administrator, has agreed to furnish us with the facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations and provide managerial assistance on our behalf to those portfolio companies to which we are required to provide such assistance. The initial term of the Administration Agreement was two years, with automatic, one-year renewals at the end of each year subject to certain approvals by our board of directors and/or our stockholders. The amount of expenses payable or reimbursable thereunder by the Company was capped at $1.0 million for the initial two year term of the Administration Agreement and subsequent renewals. On July 8, 2015, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Administration Agreement for an additional one-year term and determined to increase the cap on the payment or reimbursement of expenses by the Company thereunder, which had not been increased since the inception of the agreement, to $1.3 million. On July 7, 2016, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Administration Agreement for an additional one-year term. On October 5, 2016, our board of directors determined to increase the cap on the payment or reimbursement of expenses by the Company under the Administration Agreement, from $1.3 million to $1.5 million, effective November 1, 2016.
For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recognized $0.3 million and $0.3 million, in administrator expenses for the periods, respectively, pertaining to bookkeeping, record keeping and other administrative services provided to us in addition to our allocable portion of rent and other overhead related expenses. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recognized $1.0 million and $0.9 million, in administrator expenses for the periods, respectively, pertaining to bookkeeping, record keeping and other administrative services provided to us in addition to our allocable portion of rent and other overhead related expenses. As of November 30, 2016, $0.3 million of administrator expenses and other expenses payable to the Manager were accrued and included in due to manager in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. As of February 29, 2016, $0.2 million of administrator expenses and other expenses payable to the Manager were accrued and included in due to manager in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the Company neither bought nor sold any investments from the Saratoga CLO.
Note 6. Borrowings
Credit Facility
As a BDC, we are only allowed to employ leverage to the extent that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200.0% after giving effect to such leverage. The amount of leverage that we employ at any time depends on our assessment of the market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing.
On April 11, 2007, we entered into a $100.0 million revolving securitized credit facility (the Revolving Facility). On May 1, 2007, we entered into a $25.7 million term securitized credit facility (the Term Facility and, together with the Revolving Facility, the Facilities), which was fully drawn at closing. In December 2007, we consolidated the Facilities by using a draw under the Revolving Facility to repay the Term Facility. In response to the market wide decline in financial asset prices, which negatively affected the value of our portfolio, we terminated the revolving period of the Revolving Facility effective January 14, 2009 and commenced a two-year amortization period during which all principal proceeds from the collateral were used to repay outstanding borrowings. A significant percentage of our total assets had been pledged under the Revolving Facility to secure our obligations thereunder. Under the Revolving Facility, funds were borrowed from or through certain lenders and interest was
F-45
payable monthly at the greater of the commercial paper rate and our lenders prime rate plus 4.00% plus a default rate of 2.00% or, if the commercial paper market was unavailable, the greater of the prevailing LIBOR rates and our lenders prime rate plus 6.00% plus a default rate of 3.00%.
In March 2009, we amended the Revolving Facility to increase the portion of the portfolio that could be invested in CCC rated investments in return for an increased interest rate and expedited amortization. As a result of these transactions, we expected to have additional cushion under our borrowing base under the Revolving Facility that would allow us to better manage our capital in times of declining asset prices and market dislocation.
On July 30, 2009, we exceeded the permissible borrowing limit under the Revolving Facility for 30 consecutive days, resulting in an event of default under the Revolving Facility. As a result of this event of default, our lender had the right to accelerate repayment of the outstanding indebtedness under the Revolving Facility and to foreclose and liquidate the collateral pledged thereunder. Acceleration of the outstanding indebtedness and/or liquidation of the collateral could have had a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and operations.
On July 30, 2010, we used the net proceeds from (i) the stock purchase transaction and (ii) a portion of the funds available to us under the $45.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility) with Madison Capital Funding LLC, in each case, to pay the full amount of principal and accrued interest, including default interest, outstanding under the Revolving Facility. As a result, the Revolving Facility was terminated in connection therewith. Substantially all of our total assets, other than those held by SBIC LP, have been pledged under the Credit Facility to secure our obligations thereunder.
On February 24, 2012, we amended our senior secured revolving credit facility with Madison Capital Funding LLC to, among other things:
| expand the borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility from $40.0 million to $45.0 million; |
| extend the period during which we may make and repay borrowings under the Credit Facility from July 30, 2013 to February 24, 2015 (the Revolving Period). The Revolving Period may, upon the occurrence of an event of default, by action of the lenders or automatically, be terminated. All borrowings and other amounts payable under the Credit Facility are due and payable five years after the end of the Revolving Period; and |
| remove the condition that we may not acquire additional loan assets without the prior written consent of Madison Capital Funding LLC. |
On September 17, 2014, we entered into a second amendment to the Credit Facility with Madison Capital Funding LLC to, among other things:
| extend the commitment termination date from February 24, 2015 to September 17, 2017; |
| extend the maturity date of the Credit Facility from February 24, 2020 to September 17, 2022 (unless terminated sooner upon certain events); |
| reduce the applicable margin rate on base rate borrowings from 4.50% to 3.75%, and on LIBOR borrowings from 5.50% to 4.75%; and |
| reduce the floor on base rate borrowings from 3.00% to 2.25%; and on LIBOR borrowings from 2.00% to 1.25%. |
As of November 30, 2016 and February 29, 2016, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and the Company was in compliance with all of the limitations and requirements of the Credit Facility. Financing costs of $2.7 million related to the Credit Facility have been capitalized and are being amortized over
F-46
the term of the facility. For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recorded $0.1 million and $0.1 million of interest expense, respectively. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recorded $0.3 million and $0.6 million of interest expense, respectively. For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recorded $0.02 million and $0.02 million of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Credit Facility and Revolving Facility, respectively. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recorded $0.1 million and $0.1 million of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Credit Facility and Revolving Facility, respectively. During the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility. The interest rates during the three and nine months ended November 30, 2015 on the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility were 6.00%. During the three and nine months ended November 30, 2015, the average dollar amount of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was $0.9 million and $5.8 million, respectively.
The Credit Facility contains limitations as to how borrowed funds may be used, such as restrictions on industry concentrations, asset size, weighted average life, currency denomination and collateral interests. The Credit Facility also includes certain requirements relating to portfolio performance, the violation of which could result in the limit of further advances and, in some cases, result in an event of default, allowing the lenders to accelerate repayment of amounts owed thereunder. The Credit Facility has an eight year term, consisting of a three year period (the Revolving Period), under which the Company may make and repay borrowings, and a final maturity five years from the end of the Revolving Period. Availability on the Credit Facility will be subject to a borrowing base calculation, based on, among other things, applicable advance rates (which vary from 50.0% to 75.0% of par or fair value depending on the type of loan asset) and the value of certain eligible loan assets included as part of the Borrowing Base. Funds may be borrowed at the greater of the prevailing LIBOR rate and 2.00%, plus an applicable margin of 5.50%. At the Companys option, funds may be borrowed based on an alternative base rate, which in no event will be less than 3.00%, and the applicable margin over such alternative base rate is 4.50%. In addition, the Company will pay the lenders a commitment fee of 0.75% per year on the unused amount of the Credit Facility for the duration of the Revolving Period.
Our borrowing base under the Credit Facility was $24.1 million subject to the Credit Facility cap of $45.0 million at November 30, 2016. For purposes of determining the borrowing base, most assets are assigned the values set forth in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, the November 30, 2016 borrowing base relies upon the valuations set forth in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC on October 12, 2016. The valuations presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will not be incorporated into the borrowing base until after this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is filed with the SEC.
SBA Debentures
SBIC LP is able to borrow funds from the SBA against regulatory capital (which approximates equity capital) that is paid in and is subject to customary regulatory requirements including but not limited to an examination by the SBA. As of November 30, 2016, we have funded SBIC LP with $75.0 million of equity capital, and have $112.7 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. SBA debentures are non-recourse to us, have a 10-year maturity, and may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA debentures is fixed at the time of issuance, often referred to as pooling, at a market-driven spread over 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes. SBA current regulations limit the amount that SBIC LP may borrow to a maximum of $150.0 million, which is up to twice its potential regulatory capital.
SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses. Under present SBA regulations, eligible small businesses include businesses that have a tangible net worth not exceeding $19.5 million and have average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $6.5 million for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, an SBIC must devote 25.0% of its investment activity to smaller
F-47
concerns as defined by the SBA. A smaller concern is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6.0 million and has average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $2.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the number of employees and gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans to small businesses, invest in the equity securities of such businesses and provide them with consulting and advisory services.
SBIC LP is subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that SBIC LP will receive SBA-guaranteed debenture funding, which is dependent upon SBIC LP continuing to be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies. The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to SBIC LPs assets over our stockholders and debtholders in the event we liquidate SBIC LP or the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by SBIC LP upon an event of default.
The Company received exemptive relief from the SEC to permit it to exclude the debt of SBIC LP guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200.0% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows the Company increased flexibility under the 200.0% asset coverage test by permitting it to borrow up to $150.0 million more than it would otherwise be able to absent the receipt of this exemptive relief.
As of November 30, 2016 and February 29, 2016, there was $112.7 million and $103.7 million outstanding of SBA debentures, respectively. The carrying amount of the amount outstanding of SBA debentures approximates its fair value, which is based on a waterfall analysis showing adequate collateral coverage. $4.1 million of financing costs related to the SBA debentures have been capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the commitment and drawdown.
For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recorded $0.9 million and $0.6 million of interest expense related to the SBA debentures, respectively. For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recorded $0.1 million and $0.1 million of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the SBA debentures, respectively. The weighted average interest rate during the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015 on the outstanding borrowings of the SBA debentures was 3.08% and 3.25%, respectively.
For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recorded $2.5 million and $1.9 million of interest expense related to the SBA debentures, respectively. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we recorded $0.4 million and $0.3 million of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the SBA debentures, respectively. The weighted average interest rate during the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015 on the outstanding borrowings of the SBA debentures was 3.12% and 3.21%, respectively. During the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016, the average dollar amount of SBA debentures outstanding was $110.7 million and $106.0 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended November 30, 2015, the average dollar amount of SBA debentures outstanding was $79.0 million.
In December 2015, the 2016 omnibus spending bill approved by Congress and signed into law by the President increased the amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures that affiliated SBIC funds can have outstanding from $225.0 million to $350.0 million, subject to SBA approval. SBA regulations currently limit the amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures that an SBIC may issue to $150.0 million when it has at least $75.0 million in regulatory capital. Affiliated SBICs are permitted to issue up to a combined maximum amount of $350.0 million in SBA-guaranteed debentures when they have at least $175.0 million in combined regulatory capital.
On April 2, 2015, the SBA issued a green light letter inviting the Company to continue the application process to obtain a license to form and operate its second SBIC subsidiary. On September 27, 2016, the SBA informed us that as part of their continued review of our application for a second license, and in order to ensure
F-48
that they were reviewing the most current information available, we would need to update all previously submitted materials and invited us to reapply. As a result of this request, with which we are in the process of complying, the existing green light letter that the SBA issued to us will expire. If approved in the future, a second SBIC license would provide us an incremental source of long-term capital by permitting us to issue up to $150.0 million of additional SBA-guaranteed debentures in addition to the $150.0 million already approved under the first license.
Notes
On May 10, 2013, the Company issued $42.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.50% fixed-rate notes due 2020 (the 2020 Notes). The 2020 Notes will mature on May 31, 2020, and since May 31, 2016, may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at the Companys option. Interest will be payable quarterly beginning August 15, 2013.
On May 17, 2013, the Company closed an additional $6.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Notes, pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional 2020 Notes. On May 29, 2015, the Company entered into a Debt Distribution Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. through which the Company may offer for sale, from time to time, up to $20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Notes through an At-the-Market (ATM) offering. As of November 30, 2016, the Company sold 539,725 bonds with a principal of $13,493,125 at an average price of $25.31 for aggregate net proceeds of $13,385,766 (net of transaction costs).
As of November 30, 2016, the carrying amount and fair value of the 2020 Notes was $61.8 million and $62.3 million, respectively. The fair value of the 2020 Notes, which are publicly traded, is based upon closing market quotes as of the measurement date and would be classified as a Level 1 liability within the fair value hierarchy. As of November 30, 2016, $2.7 million of financing costs related to the 2020 Notes (including underwriting commissions and net of issuance premiums) have been capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the 2020 Notes. For the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016, we recorded $1.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively, of interest expense and $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the 2020 Notes. For the three and nine months ended November 30, 2015, we recorded $1.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, of interest expense and $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the 2020 Notes. During the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016, the average dollar amount of 2020 Notes outstanding was $61.8 million. During the three and nine months ended November 30, 2015, the average dollar amount of 2020 Notes outstanding was $59.1 million and $53.9 million, respectively.
Note 7. Commitments and contingencies
Contractual obligations
The following table shows our payment obligations for repayment of debt and other contractual obligations at November 30, 2016:
Payment Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less Than 1 Year |
1 - 3 Years |
3 - 5 Years |
More Than 5 Years |
||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
$ | 174,453 | $ | | $ | | $ | 61,793 | $ | 112,660 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet arrangements
The Companys off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $3.0 million and $2.0 million of unfunded commitments to provide debt financing to its portfolio companies or to fund limited partnership interests as of
F-49
November 30, 2016 and February 29, 2016, respectively. Such commitments are generally up to the Companys discretion to approve, or the satisfaction of certain financial and nonfinancial covenants and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Companys consolidated statements of assets and liabilities and are not reflected in the Companys consolidated statements of assets and liabilities.
A summary of the composition of the unfunded commitments as of November 30, 2016 and February 29, 2016 is shown in the table below (dollars in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
November 30, 2016 |
February 29, 2016 |
|||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC |
$ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | ||||
GreyHeller LLC. |
2,000 | | ||||||
Identity Automation Systems |
| 1,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 3,000 | $ | 2,000 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Directors Fees
The independent directors receive an annual fee of $40,000. They also receive $2,500 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting and receive $1,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each committee meeting. In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $5,000 and the chairman of each other committee receives an annual fee of $2,000 for their additional services in these capacities. In addition, we have purchased directors and officers liability insurance on behalf of our directors and officers. Independent directors have the option to receive their directors fees in the form of our common stock issued at a price per share equal to the greater of net asset value or the market price at the time of payment. No compensation is paid to directors who are interested persons of the Company (as such term is defined in the 1940 Act). For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we incurred $0.07 million and $0.05 million for directors fees and expenses, respectively. For the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, we incurred $0.2 million and $0.2 million for directors fees and expenses, respectively. As of November 30, 2016 and February 29, 2016, $0.05 million and $0.03 million in directors fees and expenses were accrued and unpaid, respectively. As of November 30, 2016, we had not issued any common stock to our directors as compensation for their services.
Note 9. Stockholders Equity
On May 16, 2006, GSC Group, Inc. capitalized the LLC, by contributing $1,000 in exchange for 67 shares, constituting all of the issued and outstanding shares of the LLC.
On March 20, 2007, the Company issued 95,995.5 and 8,136.2 shares of common stock, priced at $150.00 per share, to GSC Group and certain individual employees of GSC Group, respectively, in exchange for the general partnership interest and a limited partnership interest in GSC Partners CDO III GP, LP, collectively valued at $15.6 million. At this time, the 6.7 shares owned by GSC Group in the LLC were exchanged for 6.7 shares of the Company.
On March 28, 2007, the Company completed its IPO of 725,000 shares of common stock, priced at $150.00 per share, before underwriting discounts and commissions. Total proceeds received from the IPO, net of $7.1 million in underwriters discount and commissions, and $1.0 million in offering costs, were $100.7 million.
On November 13, 2009, we declared a dividend of $18.25 per share payable on December 31, 2009. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a
F-50
combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to $2.1 million or $2.50 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $2.1 million in cash and 864,872.5 of newly issued shares of common stock.
On July 30, 2010, our Manager and its affiliates purchased 986,842 shares of common stock at $15.20 per share. Total proceeds received from this sale were $15.0 million.
On August 12, 2010, we effected a one-for-ten reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock. As a result of the reverse stock split, every ten shares of our common stock were converted into one share of our common stock. Any fractional shares received as a result of the reverse stock split were redeemed for cash. The total cash payment in lieu of shares was $230. Immediately after the reverse stock split, we had 2,680,842 shares of our common stock outstanding.
On November 12, 2010, we declared a dividend of $4.40 per share payable on December 29, 2010. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $1.2 million or $0.44 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.2 million in cash and 596,235 shares of common stock.
On November 15, 2011, we declared a dividend of $3.00 per share payable on December 30, 2011. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $2.0 million or $0.60 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $2.0 million in cash and 599,584 shares of common stock.
On November 9, 2012, the Company declared a dividend of $4.25 per share payable on December 31, 2012. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $3.3 million or $0.85 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $3.3 million in cash and 853,455 shares of common stock.
On October 30, 2013, the Company declared a dividend of $2.65 per share payable on December 27, 2013. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $2.5 million or $0.53 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $2.5 million in cash and 649,500 shares of common stock.
On September 24, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.18 per share payable on November 28, 2014. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock pursuant to the Companys DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.6 million in cash and 22,283 newly issued shares of common stock.
On September 24, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.22 per share payable on February 27, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.8 million in cash and 26,858 newly issued shares of common stock.
On April 9, 2015, the Company declared a dividend of $0.27 per share payable on May 29, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.9 million in cash and 33,766 newly issued shares of common stock.
F-51
On May 14, 2015, the Company declared a special dividend of $1.00 per share payable on June 5, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $3.4 million in cash and 126,230 newly issued shares of common stock.
On July 8, 2015, the Company declared a dividend of $0.33 per share payable on August 31, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.1 million in cash and 47,861 newly issued shares of common stock.
On October 7, 2015, the Company declared a dividend of $0.36 per share payable on November 30, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.1 million in cash and 61,029 newly issued shares of common stock.
On January 12, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.40 per share payable on February 29, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.4 million in cash and 66,765 newly issued shares of common stock.
On March 31, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.41 per share payable on April 27, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 56,728 newly issued shares of common stock.
On July 7, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.43 per share payable on August 9, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 58,167 newly issued shares of common stock.
On August 8, 2016, the Company declared a special dividend of $0.20 per share payable on September 5, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.7 million in cash and 24,786 newly issued shares of common stock.
On October 5, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.44 per share payable on November 9, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 58,548 newly issued shares of common stock.
On September 24, 2014, the Company announced the approval of an open market share repurchase plan that allowed it to repurchase up to 200,000 shares of its common stock at prices below its NAV as reported in its then most recently published consolidated financial statements. On October 7, 2015, the Companys board of directors extended the open market share repurchase plan for another year and increased the number of shares the Company is permitted to repurchase at prices below its NAV, as reported in its then most recently published consolidated financial statements, to 400,000 shares of its common stock. On October 5, 2016, the Companys board of directors extended the open market share repurchase plan for another year to October 15, 2017 and increased the number of shares the Company is permitted to repurchase at prices below its NAV, as reported in its then most recently published consolidated financial statements, to 600,000 shares of its common stock. As of November 30, 2016, the Company purchased 214,391 shares of common stock, at the average price of $16.84 for approximately $3.6 million pursuant to this repurchase plan.
F-52
Note 10. Earnings Per Share
In accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 260, Earnings per Share (ASC 260), basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive common shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis.
The following information sets forth the computation of the weighted average basic and diluted net increase in net assets per share from operations for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015 (dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts):
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted |
November 30, 2016 |
November 30, 2015 |
November 30, 2016 |
November 30, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
$ | 1,574 | $ | 3,421 | $ | 10,133 | $ | 12,049 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
5,727,933 | 5,632,011 | 5,735,443 | 5,533,094 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average earnings per common share-basic and diluted |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 1.77 | $ | 2.18 |
Note 11. Dividend
On October 5, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.44 per share, which was paid on November 9, 2016, to common stockholders of record as of October 31, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant to our DRIP.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 58,548 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $17.12 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on October 27, 28, 31 and November 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9, 2016.
On August 8, 2016, the Company declared a special dividend of $0.20 per share, which was paid on September 5, 2016, to common stockholders of record as of August 24, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant to our DRIP.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.7 million in cash and 24,786 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.4% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $17.06 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on August 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31 and September 1 and 2, 2016.
On July 7, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.43 per share, which was paid on August 9, 2016, to common stockholders of record as of July 29, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant to our DRIP.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 58,167 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $16.32 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on July 27, 28, 29 and August 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9, 2016.
F-53
On March 31, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.41 per share, which was paid on April 27, 2016, to common stockholders of record as of April 15, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant to our DRIP.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 56,728 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.43 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on April 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26 and 27, 2016.
The following table summarizes dividends declared during the nine months ended November 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands except per share amounts):
Date Declared |
Record Date | Payment Date | Amount Per Share* |
Total Amount |
||||||||||||
October 5, 2016 |
October 31, 2016 | November 9, 2016 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 2,509 | ||||||||||
August 8, 2016 |
August 24, 2016 | September 5, 2016 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 1,151 | ||||||||||
July 7, 2016 |
July 29, 2016 | August 9, 2016 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 2,466 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2016 |
April 15, 2016 | April 27, 2016 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 2,346 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total dividends declared |
$ | 1.48 | $ | 8,472 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Amount per share is calculated based on the number of shares outstanding at the date of declaration. |
The following table summarizes dividends declared during the nine months ended November 30, 2015 (dollars in thousands except per share amounts):
Date Declared |
Record Date | Payment Date | Amount Per Share* |
Total Amount |
||||||||||||
October 7, 2015 |
November 2, 2015 | November 30, 2015 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 2,028 | ||||||||||
July 8, 2015 |
August 3, 2015 | August 31, 2015 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 1,844 | ||||||||||
May 14, 2015 |
May 26, 2015 | June 5, 2015 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 5,429 | ||||||||||
April 9, 2015 |
May 4, 2015 | May 29, 2015 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 1,466 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total dividends declared |
$ | 1.96 | $ | 10,767 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Amount per share is calculated based on the number of shares outstanding at the date of declaration. |
F-54
Note 12. Financial Highlights
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the nine months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015:
November 30, 2016 |
November 30, 2015 |
|||||||
Per share data: |
||||||||
Net asset value at beginning of period |
$ | 22.06 | $ | 22.70 | ||||
Net investment income(1) |
1.49 | 1.37 | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments |
0.28 | 0.81 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
1.77 | 2.18 | ||||||
Distributions declared from net investment income |
(1.48 | ) | (1.96 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total distributions to stockholders |
(1.48 | ) | (1.96 | ) | ||||
Dilution(4) |
(0.14 | ) | (0.33 | ) | ||||
Net asset value at end of period |
$ | 22.21 | $ | 22.59 | ||||
Net assets at end of period |
$ | 127,679,730 | $ | 127,273,366 | ||||
Shares outstanding at end of period |
5,748,247 | 5,634,115 | ||||||
Per share market value at end of period |
$ | 20.18 | $ | 15.63 | ||||
Total return based on market value(2) |
56.98 | % | 11.29 | % | ||||
Total return based on net asset value(3) |
11.37 | % | 11.67 | % | ||||
Ratio/Supplemental data: |
||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets(8) |
9.54 | % | 8.64 | % | ||||
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets(7) |
7.10 | % | 6.68 | % | ||||
Ratio of incentive management fees to average net assets(6) |
1.83 | % | 1.73 | % | ||||
Ratio of interest and debt financing expenses to average net assets(7) |
7.42 | % | 6.65 | % | ||||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets(8) |
16.35 | % | 15.06 | % | ||||
Portfolio turnover rate(5) |
31.25 | % | 23.05 | % |
(1) | Net investment income per share is calculated using the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common shares at the current market value on the first day and a sale at the current market value on the last day of the periods reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Companys DRIP. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions. Total investment returns covering less than a full period are not annualized. |
(3) | Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common shares at the current net asset value on the first day and a sale at the current net asset value on the last day of the periods reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Companys DRIP. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions. |
(4) | Represents the dilutive effect of issuing common stock below net asset value per share during the period in connection with the satisfaction of the Companys annual RIC distribution requirement. See Note 11, Dividend. |
(5) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated using the lesser of year-to-date sales or year-to-date purchases over the average of the invested assets at fair value. |
(6) | Ratios are not annualized. |
(7) | Ratios are annualized. |
(8) | Ratios are annualized. Incentive management fees included within the ratio are not annualized. |
F-55
Note 13. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the filing of this Form 10-Q and determined that there have been no events that have occurred that would require adjustments to the Companys disclosures in the consolidated financial statements except for the following:
On January 12, 2017, the Company declared a dividend of $0.45 per share payable for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2016 to all stockholders of record at the close of business on January 31, 2017, with a payment date on February 9, 2017. Shareholders will have the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock pursuant to the Companys DRIP.
On December 21, 2016, the Company issued $74.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.75% fixed-rate notes due 2023 (the 2023 Notes) for net proceeds of $72.1 million after deducting underwriting commissions of approximately $2.0 million and offering costs of approximately $0.5 million. The issuance included the exercise of substantially all of the underwriters option to purchase an additional $9.8 million aggregate principal amount of 2023 Notes within 30 days. Interest on the 2023 Notes is paid quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15, at a rate of 6.75% per year, beginning March 30, 2017. The 2023 Notes mature on December 20, 2023, and commencing December 21, 2019, may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option. The proceeds from the offering will be used to repay all of the outstanding indebtedness under the 2020 Notes, which amounts to $61.8 million.
F-56
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Saratoga Investment Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of Saratoga Investment Corp. (the Company), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the entitys internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entitys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of February 29, 2016, by correspondence with the custodian, debt agents and lenders. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Saratoga Investment Corp. at February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations, changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young
New York, New York
May 17, 2016
F-57
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities
As of | ||||||||
February 29, 2016 | February 28, 2015 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments at fair value |
||||||||
Non-control/non-affiliate investments (amortized cost of $268,145,090 and $222,505,383, respectively) |
$ | 271,168,186 | $ | 223,506,589 | ||||
Control investments (cost of $13,030,751 and $15,953,001, respectively) |
12,827,980 | 17,031,146 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total investments at fair value (amortized cost of $281,175,841 and $238,458,384, respectively) |
283,996,166 | 240,537,735 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
2,440,277 | 1,888,158 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
4,594,506 | 18,175,214 | ||||||
Interest receivable, (net of reserve of $728,519 and $309,498, respectively) |
3,195,919 | 2,469,398 | ||||||
Management fee receivable |
170,016 | 171,913 | ||||||
Other assets |
350,368 | 317,637 | ||||||
Receivable from unsettled trades |
300,000 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 295,047,252 | $ | 263,560,055 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | | $ | 9,600,000 | ||||
Deferred debt financing costs, revolving credit facility |
(515,906 | ) | (594,845 | ) | ||||
SBA debentures payable |
103,660,000 | 79,000,000 | ||||||
Deferred debt financing costs, SBA debentures payable |
(2,493,303 | ) | (2,340,894 | ) | ||||
Notes payable |
61,793,125 | 48,300,000 | ||||||
Deferred debt financing costs, notes payable |
(1,694,586 | ) | (1,847,564 | ) | ||||
Dividend payable |
875,599 | 402,200 | ||||||
Base management and incentive fees payable |
5,593,956 | 5,835,941 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
908,330 | 835,189 | ||||||
Interest and debt fees payable |
1,552,069 | 1,405,466 | ||||||
Due to manager |
218,093 | 365,820 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 169,897,377 | $ | 140,961,313 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 8) |
||||||||
NET ASSETS |
||||||||
Common stock, par value $.001, 100,000,000 common shares authorized, 5,672,227 and 5,401,899 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
$ | 5,672 | $ | 5,402 | ||||
Capital in excess of par value |
188,714,329 | 184,877,680 | ||||||
Distribution in excess of net investment income |
(26,217,902 | ) | (23,905,603 | ) | ||||
Accumulated net realized loss from investments and derivatives |
(40,172,549 | ) | (40,458,088 | ) | ||||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments and derivatives |
2,820,325 | 2,079,351 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total net assets |
125,149,875 | 122,598,742 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and net assets |
$ | 295,047,252 | $ | 263,560,055 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE |
$ | 22.06 | $ | 22.70 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-58
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the year ended February 29, 2016 |
For the year ended February 28, 2015 |
For the year ended February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
||||||||||||
Interest from investments |
||||||||||||
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments |
$ | 23,165,823 | $ | 20,790,324 | $ | 15,832,083 | ||||||
Payment-in-kind interest income from Non-control/Non-affiliate investments |
1,039,398 | 1,186,657 | 936,208 | |||||||||
Control investments |
2,665,648 | 2,707,230 | 3,410,868 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total interest income |
26,870,869 | 24,684,211 | 20,179,159 | |||||||||
Interest from cash and cash equivalents |
5,420 | 3,801 | 7,932 | |||||||||
Management fee income |
1,494,779 | 1,520,205 | 1,775,141 | |||||||||
Other income |
1,679,602 | 1,167,144 | 931,513 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total investment income |
30,050,670 | 27,375,361 | 22,893,745 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
EXPENSES |
||||||||||||
Interest and debt financing expenses |
8,456,467 | 7,375,022 | 6,083,891 | |||||||||
Base management fees |
4,528,589 | 4,156,955 | 3,326,879 | |||||||||
Professional fees |
1,336,214 | 1,301,713 | 1,211,836 | |||||||||
Administrator expenses |
1,175,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||
Incentive management fees |
2,232,188 | 2,547,773 | 938,694 | |||||||||
Insurance |
330,867 | 337,335 | 442,977 | |||||||||
Directors fees and expenses |
204,000 | 210,761 | 204,607 | |||||||||
General & administrative |
995,205 | 478,299 | 789,208 | |||||||||
Excise tax expense |
113,808 | 293,653 | | |||||||||
Other expense |
| | 21,207 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total expenses |
19,372,338 | 17,701,511 | 14,019,299 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET INVESTMENT INCOME |
10,678,332 | 9,673,850 | 8,874,446 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS: |
||||||||||||
Net realized gain from investments |
226,252 | 3,276,450 | 1,270,765 | |||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
740,974 | (1,942,936 | ) | (1,648,046 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net gain (loss) on investments |
967,226 | 1,333,514 | (377,281 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | 11,645,558 | $ | 11,007,364 | $ | 8,497,165 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGEBASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 2.09 | $ | 2.04 | $ | 1.73 | ||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDINGBASIC AND DILUTED |
5,582,453 | 5,385,049 | 4,920,517 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-59
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
February 29, 2016
Company |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) |
% of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Non-control/Non-affiliated investments216.6%(b) |
||||||||||||||||||||
National Truck Protection Co., Inc.(d),(g) |
Automotive Aftermarket | Common Stock | 1,116 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,695,303 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||
National Truck Protection Co., Inc.(d) |
Automotive Aftermarket | First Lien Term Loan 15.50% Cash, 9/13/2018 | $ | 6,776,770 | 6,776,770 | 6,776,770 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Take 5 Oil Change, L.L.C.(d),(g) |
Automotive Aftermarket | Common Stock | 7,128 | 480,535 | 6,235,209 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Automotive Aftermarket | 8,257,305 | 14,707,282 | 11.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Legacy Cabinets Holdings(d),(g) |
Building Products | Common Stock Voting A-1 | 2,535 | 220,900 | 2,676,909 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Legacy Cabinets Holdings(d),(g) |
Building Products | Common Stock Voting B-1 | 1,600 | 139,424 | 1,689,568 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Polar Holding Company, Ltd.(a),(i) |
Building Products | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 9/30/2016 | $ | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Building Products | 2,360,324 | 6,366,477 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
BMC Software, Inc.(d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan 5.00% Cash, 9/10/2020 | $ | 5,671,667 | 5,633,920 | 4,520,318 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Courion Corporation |
Business Services | Second Lien Term Loan 11.00% Cash, 6/1/2021 | $ | 15,000,000 | 14,856,720 | 14,850,000 | 11.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Dispensing Dynamics International(d) |
Business Services | Senior Secured Note 12.50% Cash, 1/1/2018 | $ | 12,000,000 | 12,025,101 | 10,950,000 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Easy Ice, LLC(d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan 9.50% Cash, 1/15/2020 | $ | 14,000,000 | 13,873,485 | 13,806,098 | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, L.L.C. |
Business Services | Senior Secured Note 10.00% Cash, 1/23/2020 | $ | 8,400,000 | 8,305,033 | 8,568,000 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, L.L.C.(g) |
Business Services | Warrant Membership Interests | 49,318 | 400,000 | 577,020 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.(Help/Systems, LLC)(d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan 6.25% Cash, 10/8/2021 | $ | 5,000,000 | 4,904,573 | 4,895,000 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.(Help/Systems, LLC)(d) |
Business Services | Second Lien Term Loan 10.50% Cash, 10/8/2022 | $ | 3,000,000 | 2,912,784 | 2,910,000 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Knowland Technology Holdings, L.L.C. |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan 8.00% Cash, 11/29/2017 | $ | 5,259,171 | 5,224,422 | 5,259,171 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||
PCF Number 4, Inc. |
Business Services | Second Lien Term Loan 13.50% (12.50% Cash/1.00% PIK), 8/28/2021 | $ | 13,000,000 | 12,870,023 | 12,870,000 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., LLC(d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan, 14.00% (12.00% Cash/2.00% PIK), 3/6/2018 | $ | 9,035,515 | 8,952,442 | 9,035,515 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., LLC(d),(g) |
Business Services | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests | 343 | | 354,819 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Business Services | 89,958,503 | 88,595,941 | 70.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Advanced Air & Heat of Florida, LLC |
Consumer Products | First Lien Term Loan 9.50% Cash, 7/17/2020 | $ | 6,800,000 | 6,733,661 | 6,800,000 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d),(g) |
Consumer Products | Common Stock | 210,456 | 1,791,242 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Products | Second Lien Term Loan A-2 15.00% Cash, 12/31/2019 | $ | 210,456 | 210,456 | 210,456 | 0.2 | % |
F-60
Company |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) |
% of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Products | Second Lien Term Loan B 15.00% Cash, 12/31/2019 | $ | 631,369 | 631,369 | 631,369 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Products | 9,366,728 | 7,641,825 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Expedited Travel |
Consumer Services | Common Stock | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,647,767 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Expedited Travel L.L.C. |
Consumer Services | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 10/10/2019 | $ | 11,475,490 | 11,401,380 | 11,647,623 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||||
My Alarm Center, LLC |
Consumer Services | Second Lien Term Loan 12.00% Cash, 7/9/2019 | $ | 7,500,000 | 7,500,000 | 7,450,500 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Services | First Lien Term Loan 6.50% Cash, 7/1/2019 | $ | 1,572,921 | 1,562,787 | 1,556,248 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Services | Second Lien Term Loan 10.25% Cash, 7/1/2020 | $ | 10,000,000 | 9,962,104 | 9,827,000 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Prime Security Services, LLC |
Consumer Services | Second Lien Term Loan 9.75% Cash, 7/1/2022 | $ | 12,000,000 | 11,829,030 | 10,980,000 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Services | 43,255,301 | 43,109,138 | 34.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., |
Education | Class A Common Stock | 544,761 | 30,241 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., L.L.C.(d) |
Education | First Lien Term Loan 1.00% Cash, 3/31/2016 | $ | 2,321,073 | 1,193,790 | 8,087 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Texas Teachers of Tomorrow, LLC(g),(h) |
Education | Common Stock | 750 | 750,000 | 785,475 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Texas Teachers of Tomorrow, LLC |
Education | Second Lien Term Loan 10.75% Cash, 6/2/2021 | $ | 10,000,000 | 9,902,816 | 9,900,000 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Education | 11,876,847 | 10,693,562 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TM Restaurant Group L.L.C. |
Food and Beverage | First Lien Term Loan 9.75% Cash, 7/16/2017 | $ | 9,622,319 | 9,527,041 | 9,131,048 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Food and Beverage | 9,527,041 | 9,131,048 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Bristol Hospice, LLC |
Healthcare Services | Senior Secured Note 11.00% (10.00% Cash/1.00% PIK), 11/29/2018 | $ | 5,404,747 | 5,339,820 | 5,404,747 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, |
Healthcare Services | Common Stock | 5,000 | 500,000 | 334,000 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, Inc. |
Healthcare Services | Second Lien Term Loan 11.25% Cash, 9/26/2019 | $ | 4,200,000 | 4,141,519 | 3,822,000 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Ohio Medical, LLC(g) |
Healthcare Services | Common Stock | 5,000 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Ohio Medical, LLC |
Healthcare Services | Senior Subordinated Note 12.00% , 7/15/2021 | $ | 7,300,000 | 7,228,452 | 7,227,000 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Smile Brands Group |
Healthcare Services | First Lien Term Loan 10.50% (9.00% Cash/1.50% PIK), 8/16/2019 | $ | 4,420,900 | 4,362,266 | 3,216,647 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Zest Holdings, LLC(d) |
Healthcare Services | First Lien Term Loan 5.25% Cash, 8/16/2020 | $ | 4,207,821 | 4,142,093 | 4,130,692 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Healthcare Services | 26,214,150 | 24,635,086 | 19.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 5/16/2019 | $ | 8,937,982 | 8,812,479 | 8,937,983 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 5/16/2019 | $ | 1,600,000 | 1,572,821 | 1,600,000 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | Class A Series | 4,264 | 61,647 | 314,683 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | Class A Warrant | 30,320 | 438,353 | 1,889,542 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests (Common) | 57,872 | | 3,309,121 | 2.6 | % |
F-61
Company |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) |
% of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests | 8,139 | | 523,012 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Media | 10,885,300 | 16,574,341 | 13.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C. |
Metals | Common Stock | 35,000 | 9,217,564 | 2,026,150 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C. |
Metals | Revolver 10.00% Cash, 3/31/2017 | $ | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Metals | 17,717,564 | 10,526,150 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC(g) |
Software as a Service | Common Stock | 100,000 | 100,000 | 169,850 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC |
Software as a Service | First Lien Term Loan 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 | $ | 2,406,342 | 2,376,045 | 2,382,844 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, |
Software as a Service | Delayed Draw Term Loan A 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 | $ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, Inc. |
Software as a Service | First Lien Term Loan B 11.00% Cash, 7/24/2019 | $ | 11,550,000 | 11,377,810 | 11,459,418 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, |
Software as a Service | Limited Partner Interests | 999 | 999,000 | 810,642 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Finalsite Holdings, Inc. |
Software as a Service | Second Lien Term Loan 10.25% Cash, 5/21/2020 | $ | 7,500,000 | 7,440,729 | 7,500,000 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Identity Automation |
Software as a Service | Common Stock Class A Units | 232,616 | 232,616 | 427,409 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems |
Software as a Service | First Lien Term Loan 10.25% Cash, 12/18/2020 | $ | 6,900,000 | 6,842,573 | 6,900,000 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems(j),(k) |
Software as a Service | Delayed Draw Term Loan 10.25% Cash, 12/18/2020 | $ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Mercury Network, LLC |
Software as a Service | First Lien Term Loan 9.75% Cash, 4/24/2020 | $ | 9,025,000 | 8,944,211 | 9,025,000 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Mercury Network, |
Software as a Service | Common Stock | 413,043 | 413,043 | 512,173 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Software as a Service | 38,726,027 | 39,187,336 | 31.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub Total Non-control/Non-affiliated investments |
268,145,090 | 271,168,186 | 216.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Control investments10.3%(b) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.(a),(d),(e),(f) |
Structured Finance Securities | Other/Structured Finance Securities 16.14%, 10/17/2023 | $ | 30,000,000 | 13,030,751 | 12,827,980 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub Total Control investments |
13,030,751 | 12,827,980 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS226.9%(b) |
$ | 281,175,841 | $ | 283,996,166 | 226.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) |
% of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents,
reserve |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Bank Money Market(l) |
$ | 7,034,783 | $ | 7,034,783 | $ | 7,034,783 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
$ | 7,034,783 | $ | 7,034,783 | $ | 7,034,783 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Represents a non-qualifying investment as defined under Section 55 (a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Non-qualifying assets represent 5.2% of the Companys portfolio at fair value. As a BDC, the Company can only invest 30% of its portfolio in non-qualifying assets. |
F-62
(b) | Percentages are based on net assets of $125,149,875 as of February 29, 2016. |
(c) | Because there is no readily available market value for these investments, the fair value of these investments is approved in good faith by our board of directors (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(d) | These securities are pledged as collateral under a senior secured revolving credit facility (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(e) | This investment does not have a stated interest rate that is payable thereon. As a result, the 16.14% interest rate in the table above represents the effective interest rate currently earned on the investment cost and is based on the current cash interest and other income generated by the investment. |
(f) | As defined in the Investment Company Act, we Control this portfolio company because we own more than 25% of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the period in which the issuer was both an Affiliate and a portfolio company that we Control are as follows: |
Company |
Purchases | Redemptions | Sales (Cost) | Interest Income |
Management Fee Income |
Net Realized Gains/(Losses) |
Net Unrealized Depreciation |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,665,648 | $ | 1,494,779 | $ | | $ | (202,771 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) | Non-income producing at February 29, 2016. |
(h) | Includes securities issued by an affiliate of the company. |
(i) | Non-U.S. company. The principal place of business for Polar Holding Company, Ltd. is Canada. |
(j) | The investment has an unfunded commitment as of February 29, 2016 (see Note 8). |
(k) | The entire commitment was unfunded at February 29, 2016. As such, no interest is being earned on this investment. |
(l) | Included within cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of February 29, 2016. |
F-63
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
February 28, 2015
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Non-control/Non-affiliated |
||||||||||||||||||||
National Truck Protection Co., |
Automotive Aftermarket | Common Stock | 1,116 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,769,432 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||
National Truck Protection Co., Inc.(d) |
Automotive Aftermarket | First Lien Term Loan 15.50% Cash, 9/13/2018 | $ | 7,737,848 | 7,737,848 | 7,737,848 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Take 5 Oil Change, |
Automotive Aftermarket | Common Stock | 7,128 | 480,535 | 1,472,502 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Automotive Aftermarket | 9,218,383 | 10,979,782 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Legacy Cabinets |
Building Products | Common Stock Voting A-1 | 2,535 | 220,900 | 1,493,470 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Legacy Cabinets |
Building Products | Common Stock Voting B-1 | 1,600 | 139,424 | 942,624 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Polar Holding Company, |
Building Products | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 8/13/2016 | $ | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Building Products | 1,360,324 | 3,436,094 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
BMC Software, Inc.(d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan 5.00% Cash, 9/10/2020 | $ | 5,731,667 | 5,686,622 | 5,478,327 | 4.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Dispensing Dynamics International(d) |
Business Services | Senior Secured Note 12.50% Cash, 1/1/2018 | $ | 7,000,000 | 6,910,112 | 7,350,000 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Easy Ice, LLC(d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan 9.50% Cash, 1/15/2020 | $ | 12,000,000 | 11,872,639 | 12,000,000 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, L.L.C. |
Business Services | Senior Secured Note 10.00% Cash, 1/23/2020 | $ | 8,400,000 | 8,260,787 | 8,400,000 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Emily Street Enterprises, |
Business Services | Warrant Membership Interests | 49,318 | 400,000 | 391,584 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.(Help/Systems, LLC)(d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan 5.50% Cash, 6/28/2019 | $ | 1,955,051 | 1,941,417 | 1,925,725 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.(Help/Systems, LLC)(d) |
Business Services | Second Lien Term Loan 9.50% Cash, 6/28/2020 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,975,767 | 1,965,000 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Knowland Technology Holdings, L.L.C. |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan 11.00% Cash, 11/29/2017 | $ | 5,259,171 | 5,205,142 | 5,259,171 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Knowland Technology Holdings, |
Business Services | Delayed Draw Term Loan 11.00% Cash, 11/29/2017 | $ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., LLC(d) |
Business Services | First Lien Term Loan, 14.00% (12.00% Cash/2.00% PIK), 3/6/2018 | $ | 9,436,991 | 9,312,095 | 9,295,437 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Vector Controls Holding Co., LLC(d),(g) |
Business Services | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests | 101 | | 62,341 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Business Services | 51,564,581 | 52,127,585 | 42.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Advanced Air & Heat of Florida, LLC |
Consumer Products | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 1/31/2019 | $ | 5,955,441 | 5,881,694 | 5,955,441 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Targus Group International, |
Consumer Products | First Lien Term Loan, 12.00% (11.00% Cash/1.00 PIK), 5/24/2016 | $ | 3,569,127 | 3,537,732 | 3,283,597 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d),(g) |
Consumer Products | Common Stock | 62,413 | 566,765 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d),(g) |
Consumer Products | Unsecured Note 10.00% PIK, 6/14/2019 | $ | 2,054,158 | 2,054,158 | | 0.0 | % |
F-64
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Targus Holdings, Inc.(d),(g) |
Consumer Products | Unsecured Note 16.00% PIK, 10/26/2018 | $ | 429,797 | 425,227 | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Products | 12,465,576 | 9,239,038 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
CFF Acquisition L.L.C.(d) |
Consumer Services | First Lien Term Loan 7.50% Cash, 7/31/2015 | $ | 716,179 | 714,270 | 716,179 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Expedited Travel L.L.C.(g) |
Consumer Services | Common Stock | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,069,157 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||
Expedited Travel L.L.C. |
Consumer Services | First Lien Term Loan 10.00% Cash, 10/10/2019 | $ | 13,750,000 | 13,609,579 | 13,750,000 | 11.2 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Services | First Lien Term Loan 6.25% Cash, 7/1/2019 | $ | 3,709,677 | 3,680,863 | 3,652,919 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc.(d) |
Consumer Services | Second Lien Term Loan 9.75% Cash, 7/1/2020 | $ | 5,000,000 | 4,937,212 | 4,981,000 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Consumer Services | 23,941,924 | 24,169,255 | 22.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., L.L.C.(d),(g) |
Education | Class A Common Stock | 544,761 | 30,241 | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
M/C Acquisition Corp., |
Education | First Lien Term Loan 1.00% Cash, 3/31/2015 | $ | 2,362,978 | 1,235,695 | 100,951 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Education | 1,265,936 | 100,951 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Group Dekko, Inc.(d) |
Electronics | Second Lien Term Loan 11.00% (10.00% Cash/1.00% PIK), 5/1/2016 | $ | 6,950,048 | 6,950,048 | 6,667,181 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Electronics | 6,950,048 | 6,667,181 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TB Corp.(d) |
Food and Beverage | First Lien Term Loan 5.76% Cash, 6/19/2018 | $ | 5,050,436 | 5,038,131 | 5,037,810 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||||
TB Corp.(d) |
Food and Beverage | Unsecured Note 13.50% (12.00% Cash/1.50% PIK), 12/20/2018 | $ | 2,546,121 | 2,512,732 | 2,546,121 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||||||
TM Restaurant Group L.L.C. |
Food and Beverage | First Lien Term Loan 7.75% Cash, 7/16/2017 | $ | 2,791,595 | 2,791,595 | 2,763,679 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Food and Beverage | 10,342,458 | 10,347,610 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Bristol Hospice, LLC |
Healthcare Services | Senior Secured Note 11.00% (10.00% Cash/1.00% PIK), 11/29/2018 | $ | 5,459,134 | 5,374,249 | 5,459,134 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Bristol Hospice, LLC(j),(l) |
Healthcare Services | Delayed Draw Term Loan 11.00% (10.00% Cash/1.00% PIK), 11/29/2018 | $ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, Inc.(d),(g) |
Healthcare Services | Common Stock | 5,000 | 500,000 | 294,500 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Roscoe Medical, Inc. |
Healthcare Services | Second Lien Term Loan 11.25% Cash, 9/26/2019 | $ | 4,200,000 | 4,129,704 | 3,990,000 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Smile Brands Group Inc.(d) |
Healthcare Services | First Lien Term Loan 7.50% Cash, 8/16/2019 | $ | 4,443,750 | 4,373,369 | 4,159,350 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Surgical Specialties Corporation (US), Inc.(d) |
Healthcare Services | First Lien Term Loan 7.25% Cash, 8/22/2018 | $ | 2,312,500 | 2,295,234 | 2,277,813 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Zest Holdings, LLC(d) |
Healthcare Services | First Lien Term Loan 5.25% Cash, 8/16/2020 | $ | 4,443,919 | 4,361,438 | 4,460,806 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Healthcare Services | 21,033,994 | 20,641,603 | 16.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | First Lien Term Loan 14.00% (12.00% Cash/2.00% PIK), 5/16/2019 | $ | 9,368,327 | 9,206,438 | 9,579,115 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
Media | First Lien Term Loan 12.00% Cash, 5/16/2020 | $ | 1,600,000 | 1,569,149 | 1,576,000 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(j),(k) |
Media | Deferred Draw Term Loan 12.00% Cash, 5/16/2020 | $ | | | (36,000 | ) | 0.0 | % |
F-65
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | Class A Series | 4,264 | 61,647 | 223,604 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | Class A Warrant | 30,320 | 438,353 | 1,247,365 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests (Common) | 57,872 | | 2,085,128 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC(g) |
Media | Warrants to Purchase Limited Liability Company Interests | 8,139 | | 350,464 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Media | 11,275,587 | 15,025,676 | 12.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C.(d),(g) |
Metals | Common Stock | 35,000 | 9,217,563 | 6,762,000 | 5.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Elyria Foundry Company, L.L.C.(d) |
Metals | Revolver 9.00% Cash, 12/31/2020 | $ | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Metals | 17,717,563 | 15,262,000 | 12.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Network Communications, Inc.(d),(g) |
Publishing | Common Stock | 380,572 | | 300,652 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Network Communications, Inc.(d) |
Publishing | Unsecured Notes 8.60% PIK, 1/14/2020 | $ | 2,732,976 | 2,374,260 | 1,684,118 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Publishing | 2,374,260 | 1,984,770 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC(g) |
Software as a Service | Common Stock | 100,000 | 100,000 | 163,000 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC |
Software as a Service | First Lien Term Loan 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 | $ | 3,000,000 | 2,951,759 | 3,000,000 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC(j),(l) |
Software as a Service | Delayed Draw Term Loan A 9.75% Cash, 1/8/2019 | $ | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, Inc. |
Software as a Service | First Lien Term Loan B 11.00% Cash, 7/24/2019 | $ | 11,850,000 | 11,634,939 | 11,850,000 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Censis Technologies, Inc.(g),(h) |
Software as a Service | Limited Partner Interests | 999 | 999,000 | 981,627 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Community Investors, Inc.(g) |
Software as a Service | Common Stock | 1,282 | 1,282 | 1,769 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Community Investors, Inc. |
Software as a Service | First Lien, Last Out Term Loan 11.78% Cash, 9/30/2019 | $ | 12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Community Investors, Inc. |
Software as a Service | First Lien Term Loan B 12.25% Cash, 12/31/2020 | $ | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Community Investors, Inc.(g) |
Software as a Service | Preferred Stock 10% | 63,463 | 149,138 | 87,579 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Community Investors, Inc. |
Software as a Service | Preferred Stock - A2 10% | 38,641 | 100,853 | 53,325 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Community Investors, Inc.(g) |
Software as a Service | Preferred Stock - A Shares 10% | 135,584 | 135,584 | 187,106 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Finalsite Holdings, Inc. |
Software as a Service | Second Lien Term Loan 10.25% Cash, 11/21/2019 | $ | 7,500,000 | 7,429,305 | 7,500,000 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems(g) |
Software as a Service | Common Stock Class A Units | 232,616 | 232,616 | 225,638 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Identity Automation Systems |
Software as a Service | First Lien Term Loan 10.25% Cash, 8/25/2019 | $ | 4,475,000 | 4,433,897 | 4,475,000 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Pen-Link, Ltd.(d) |
Software as a Service | Second Lien Term Loan 12.50% Cash, 5/26/2019 | $ | 10,500,000 | 10,326,376 | 10,500,000 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Software as a Service | 52,994,749 | 53,525,044 | 43.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
Company |
Industry |
Investment Interest Rate / Maturity |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value(c) | % of Net Assets |
||||||||||||||
Sub Total Non-control/Non-affiliated investments |
222,505,383 | 223,506,589 | 182.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Control investments13.9%(b) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.(a),(d),(e),(f) |
Structured Finance Securities | Other/Structured Finance Securities 14.32%, 10/17/2023 | $ | 30,000,000 | 15,953,001 | 17,031,146 | 13.9 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub Total Control investments |
15,953,001 | 17,031,146 | 13.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS196.2%(b) |
$ | 238,458,384 | $ | 240,537,735 | 196.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value (c) | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts16.4% |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Bank Money Market(m) |
$ | 20,063,372 | $ | 20,063,372 | $ | 20,063,372 | 16.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
$ | 20,063,372 | $ | 20,063,372 | $ | 20,063,372 | 16.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Represents a non-qualifyng investment as defined under Section 55 (a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Non-qualifying assets represent 7.5% of the Companys portfolio at fair value. As a BDC, the Company can only invest 30% of its portfolio in non-qualifying assets. |
(b) | Percentages are based on net assets of $122,598,742, as of February 28, 2015. |
(c) | Because there is no readily available market value for these investments, the fair value of these investments is approved in good faith by our board of directors. (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(d) | These securities are pledged as collateral under a senior secured revolving credit facility (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(e) | This investment does not have a stated interest rate that is payable thereon. As a result, the 14.32% interest rate in the table above represents the effective interest rate currently earned on the investment cost and is based on the current cash interest and other income generated by the investment. |
(f) | As defined in the Investment Company Act, we Control this portfolio company because we own more than 25% of the portfolio companys outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the period in which the issuer was both an Affiliate and a portfolio company that we Control are as follows: |
Company |
Purchases | Redemptions | Sales (Cost) |
Interest Income |
Management Fee Income |
Net Realized Gains/ (Losses) |
Net Unrealized Appreciation |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,707,230 | $ | 1,520,205 | $ | | $ | 1,078,145 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) | Non-income producing at February 28, 2015. |
(h) | Includes securities issued by an affiliate of the company. |
(i) | Non-U.S. company. The principal place of business for Polar Holding Company, Ltd. is Canada. |
(j) | The investment has an unfunded commitment as of February 28, 2015 (See Note 8). |
(k) | Includes an analysis of the value of any unfunded loan commitments. |
(l) | The entire commitment was unfunded at February 28, 2015. As such, no interest is being earned on this investment. |
(m) | Included within cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of February 28, 2015. |
F-67
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
For the year ended February 29, 2016 |
For the year ended February 28, 2015 |
For the year ended February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||
INCREASE FROM OPERATIONS: |
||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 10,678,332 | $ | 9,673,850 | $ | 8,874,446 | ||||||
Net realized gain from investments |
226,252 | 3,276,450 | 1,270,765 | |||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
740,974 | (1,942,936 | ) | (1,648,046 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
11,645,558 | 11,007,364 | 8,497,165 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
DECREASE FROM SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTIONS: |
|
|||||||||||
Distributions declared |
(13,045,149 | ) | (2,156,740 | ) | (12,534,807 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net decrease in net assets from shareholder distributions |
(13,045,149 | ) | (2,156,740 | ) | (12,534,807 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
||||||||||||
Stock dividend distribution |
4,665,447 | 320,189 | 10,027,697 | |||||||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(356,792 | ) | | | ||||||||
Offering costs |
(357,931 | ) | | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions |
3,950,724 | 320,189 | 10,027,697 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total increase in net assets |
2,551,133 | 9,170,813 | 5,990,055 | |||||||||
Net assets at beginning of period |
122,598,742 | 113,427,929 | 107,437,874 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net assets at end of period |
$ | 125,149,875 | $ | 122,598,742 | $ | 113,427,929 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net asset value per common share |
$ | 22.06 | $ | 22.70 | $ | 21.08 | ||||||
Common shares outstanding at end of period |
5,672,227 | 5,401,899 | 5,379,616 | |||||||||
Distribution in excess of net investment income |
$ | (26,217,902 | ) | $ | (23,905,603 | ) | $ | (31,123,667 | ) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-68
Saratoga Investment Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the year ended February 29, 2016 |
For the year ended February 28, 2015 |
For the year ended February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | 11,645,558 | $ | 11,007,364 | $ | 8,497,165 | ||||||
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS TO NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Paid-in-kind interest income |
(966,906 | ) | (1,204,458 | ) | (1,007,494 | ) | ||||||
Net accretion of discount on investments |
(507,180 | ) | (540,069 | ) | (666,849 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of deferred debt financing costs |
913,773 | 929,773 | 903,289 | |||||||||
Net realized gain from investments |
(226,252 | ) | (3,276,450 | ) | (1,270,765 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments |
(740,974 | ) | 1,942,936 | 1,648,046 | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale and redemption of investments |
68,174,143 | 73,257,332 | 71,606,736 | |||||||||
Purchase of investments |
(109,191,262 | ) | (104,872,326 | ) | (121,073,990 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in operating assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts |
13,580,708 | (14,882,101 | ) | 8,793,029 | ||||||||
Interest receivable |
(726,521 | ) | 102,455 | 317,505 | ||||||||
Management fee receivable |
1,897 | (21,807 | ) | 65,747 | ||||||||
Other assets |
(128,370 | ) | (34,930 | ) | 68,946 | |||||||
Receivable from unsettled trades |
(300,000 | ) | | 1,817,074 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Management and incentive fees payable |
(241,985 | ) | 482,890 | (405,158 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
73,141 | 10,621 | 389,530 | |||||||||
Interest and debt fees payable |
146,603 | 532,331 | 615,339 | |||||||||
Due to manager |
(147,727 | ) | (32,334 | ) | 175,641 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
(18,641,354 | ) | (36,598,773 | ) | (29,526,209 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||
Borrowings on debt |
35,260,000 | 52,300,000 | 18,000,000 | |||||||||
Paydowns on debt |
(20,200,000 | ) | (13,700,000 | ) | (28,300,000 | ) | ||||||
Issuance of notes |
13,493,125 | | 48,300,000 | |||||||||
Debt financing cost |
(1,096,556 | ) | (1,972,618 | ) | (2,821,806 | ) | ||||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(356,792 | ) | | | ||||||||
Payments of cash dividends |
(7,906,304 | ) | (1,434,349 | ) | (2,507,112 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
19,193,473 | 35,193,033 | 32,671,082 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
552,119 | (1,405,740 | ) | 3,144,873 | ||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
1,888,158 | 3,293,898 | 149,025 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 2,440,277 | $ | 1,888,158 | $ | 3,293,898 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||
Interest paid during the period |
$ | 7,396,091 | $ | 5,912,862 | $ | 4,565,262 | ||||||
Supplemental non-cash information: |
||||||||||||
Paid-in-kind interest income |
$ | 966,906 | $ | 1,204,458 | $ | 1,007,494 | ||||||
Net accretion of discount on investments |
$ | 507,180 | $ | 540,069 | $ | 666,849 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred debt financing costs |
$ | 913,773 | $ | 929,773 | $ | 903,289 | ||||||
Stock dividend distribution |
$ | 4,665,447 | $ | 320,189 | $ | 10,027,697 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-69
SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
February 29, 2016
Note 1. Organization
Saratoga Investment Corp. (the Company, we, our and us) is a non-diversified closed end management investment company incorporated in Maryland that has elected to be treated and is regulated as a business development company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Company commenced operations on March 23, 2007 as GSC Investment Corp. and completed the initial public offering (IPO) on March 28, 2007. The Company has elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (RIC) under subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). The Company expects to continue to qualify and to elect to be treated for tax purposes as a RIC. The Companys investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation from our investments.
GSC Investment, LLC (the LLC) was organized in May 2006 as a Maryland limited liability company. As of February 28, 2007, the LLC had not yet commenced its operations and investment activities.
On March 21, 2007, the Company was incorporated and concurrently therewith the LLC was merged with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving entity, in accordance with the procedure for such merger in the LLCs limited liability company agreement and Maryland law. In connection with such merger, each outstanding limited liability company interest of the LLC was converted into a share of common stock of the Company.
On July 30, 2010, the Company changed its name from GSC Investment Corp. to Saratoga Investment Corp..
The Company is externally managed and advised by the investment adviser, Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC (the Manager), pursuant to the Management Agreement. Prior to July 30, 2010, the Company was managed and advised by GSCP (NJ), L.P.
The Company has established wholly owned subsidiaries, SIA Avionte, Inc, SIA Mercury, Inc., SIA TT Inc., and SIA Vector Inc., which are structured as Delaware entities, or tax blockers, to hold equity or equity-like investments in portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs (or other forms of pass through entities). Tax blockers are consolidated for accounting purposes, but are not consolidated for income tax purposes and may incur income tax expense as a result of their ownership of portfolio companies.
On March 28, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC, LP (SBIC LP), received a Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) license from the Small Business Administration (SBA).
On April 2, 2015, the SBA issued a green light or go forth letter inviting the Company to continue the application process to obtain a license to form and operate its second SBIC subsidiary. If approved, a second SBIC license would provide us an incremental source of long-term capital by permitting us to issue up to $150.0 million of additional SBA-guaranteed debentures in addition to the $150.0 million already approved under the first license. Receipt of a green light letter from the SBA does not assure an applicant that the SBA will ultimately issue an SBIC license and the Company has received no assurance or indication from the SBA that it will receive an SBIC license, or of the timeframe in which it would receive a license, should one be granted.
F-70
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP), are stated in U.S. dollars and include the accounts of the Company and its special purpose financing subsidiary, Saratoga Investment Funding, LLC (previously known as GSC Investment Funding LLC). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All references made to the Company, we, and us herein include Saratoga Investment Corp. and its consolidated subsidiary, except as stated otherwise.
The Company and SBIC LP are both considered to be investment companies for financial reporting purposes and have applied the guidance in Topic 946, Financial ServicesInvestment Companies. There have been no changes to the Company or SBIC LPs status as investment companies during the year ended February 29, 2016.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and income, gains (losses) and expenses during the period reported. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Correction of Immaterial Errors Related to Prior Period
During the year ended February 28, 2015, the Company identified errors related to the accounting for the capital gains portion of the incentive fee for the years ended February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, as well as the cumulative impact of these errors as of February 28, 2014.
The Company assessed the materiality of these errors and concluded they were not material to any prior annual periods, but the cumulative impact of correcting them in the year ended February 28, 2015 would be quantitatively material to the results of operations of the Company for the year then ended February 28, 2015, if the entire adjustment was recorded in that period. Therefore, the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended February 28, 2014 have been corrected.
The effects of these prior period errors on the consolidated financial statements are as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Revised Consolidated Statement of Operations
Year Ended February 28, 2014 | ||||||||||||
As Previously Reported |
Adjustments | As Revised |
||||||||||
EXPENSES |
||||||||||||
Incentive management fees |
$ | 692 | $ | 247 | $ | 939 | ||||||
Total expenses |
13,772 | 247 | 14,019 | |||||||||
NET INVESTMENT INCOME |
9,121 | (247 | ) | 8,874 | ||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | 8,744 | $ | (247 | ) | $ | 8,497 | |||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGEBASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 1.78 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 1.73 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-71
Revised Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Year Ended February 28, 2014 | ||||||||||||
As Previously Reported |
Adjustments | As Revised |
||||||||||
INCREASE FROM OPERATIONS |
||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 9,121 | $ | (247 | ) | $ | 8,874 | |||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
8,744 | (247 | ) | 8,497 | ||||||||
Total increase in net assets |
6,237 | (247 | ) | 5,990 | ||||||||
Net assets at beginning of period |
108,687 | (1,249 | ) | 107,438 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net assets at end of period |
$ | 114,924 | $ | (1,496 | ) | $ | 113,428 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net asset value per common share |
$ | 21.36 | $ | (0.28 | ) | $ | 21.08 | |||||
Distribution in excess of net investment income |
$ | (29,628 | ) | $ | (1,496 | ) | $ | (31,124 | ) |
Revised Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended February 28, 2014 | ||||||||||||
As Previously Reported |
Adjustments | As Revised |
||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | 8,744 | $ | (247 | ) | $ | 8,497 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Management and incentive fees payable |
(652 | ) | 247 | (405 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term, liquid investments in a money market fund. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value. Per section 12(d)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, the Company may not invest in another registered investment company such as, a money market fund if such investment would cause the Company to exceed any of the following limitations:
| we were to own more than 3.0% of the total outstanding voting stock of the money market fund; |
| we were to hold securities in the money market fund having an aggregate value in excess of 5.0% of the value of our total assets; or |
| we were to hold securities in money market funds and other registered investment companies and BDCs having an aggregate value in excess of 10.0% of the value of our total assets. |
As of February 29, 2016, the Company did not exceed any of these limitations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Reserve Accounts
Cash and cash equivalents, reserve accounts include amounts held in designated bank accounts in the form of cash and short-term liquid investments in money market funds representing payments received on secured investments or other reserved amounts associated with our $45.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility with Madison Capital Funding LLC. The Company is required to use these amounts to pay interest expense, reduce borrowings, or pay other amounts in accordance with the terms of the senior secured revolving credit facility.
F-72
Investment Classification
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, Control Investments are defined as investments in companies in which we own more than 25.0% of the voting securities or maintain greater than 50.0% of the board representation. Under the 1940 Act, Affiliated Investments are defined as those non-control investments in companies in which we own between 5.0% and 25.0% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, Non-affiliated Investments are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliated Investments.
Investment Valuation
The Company accounts for its investments at fair value in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. ASC 820 requires the Company to assume that its investments are to be sold at the statement of assets and liabilities date in the principal market to independent market participants, or in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market, which may be a hypothetical market. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are fair valued at such market quotations obtained from independent third party pricing services and market makers subject to any decision by our board of directors to approve a fair value determination to reflect significant events affecting the value of these investments. We value investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair value as approved, in good faith, by our board of directors based on input from our Manager, the audit committee of our board of directors and a third party independent valuation firm. Determinations of fair value may involve subjective judgments and estimates. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments, market yield trend analysis, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.
We undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter when valuing investments for which market quotations are not readily available, as described below:
| Each investment is initially valued by the responsible investment professionals of our Manager and preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with the senior management of our Manager; and |
| An independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors reviews approximately one quarter of these preliminary valuations each quarter so that the valuation of each investment for which market quotes are not readily available is reviewed by the independent valuation firm at least annually. |
In addition, all our investments are subject to the following valuation process:
| The audit committee of our board of directors reviews each preliminary valuation and our Manager and independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee; and |
| Our board of directors discusses the valuations and approves the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of our Manager, independent valuation firm (to the extent applicable) and the audit committee of our board of directors. |
F-73
Our investment in Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (Saratoga CLO) is carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for equity interests in collateralized loan obligation funds similar to Saratoga CLO, when available, as determined by our Manager and recommended to our board of directors. Specifically, we use Intex cash flow models, or an appropriate substitute, to form the basis for the valuation of our investment in Saratoga CLO. The models use a set of assumptions including projected default rates, recovery rates, reinvestment rate and prepayment rates in order to arrive at estimated valuations. The assumptions are based on available market data and projections provided by third parties as well as management estimates. We use the output from the Intex models (i.e., the estimated cash flows) to perform a discounted cash flow analysis on expected future cash flows to determine a valuation for our investment in Saratoga CLO.
Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The determination of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). ASC 815 requires recognizing all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company values derivative contracts at the closing fair value provided by the counterparty. Changes in the values of derivative contracts are included in the consolidated statements of operations.
Investment Transactions and Income Recognition
Purchases and sales of investments and the related realized gains or losses are recorded on a trade-date basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company stops accruing interest on its investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Discounts and premiums on investments purchased are accreted/amortized over the life of the respective investment using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortizations of premium on investments.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. Accrued interest is generally reserved when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as a reduction in principal depending upon managements judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in managements judgment, are likely to remain current, although we may make exceptions to this general rule if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection.
Interest income on our investment in Saratoga CLO is recorded using the effective interest method in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 325-40, Investments-Other, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, (ASC 325-40), based on the anticipated yield and the estimated cash flows over the projected life of the investment. Yields are revised when there are changes in actual or estimated cash flows due to changes in prepayments and/or re-investments, credit losses or asset pricing. Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an adjustment to the estimated yield over the remaining life of the investment from the date the estimated yield was changed.
F-74
Other Income
Other income includes dividends received, origination fees, structuring fees and advisory fees, and is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations when earned.
Paid-in-Kind Interest
The Company holds debt investments in its portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind (PIK) interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the investment balance that is generally due at maturity, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. We stop accruing PIK interest if we do not expect the issuer to be able to pay all principal and interest when due.
Deferred Debt Financing Costs
Financing costs incurred in connection with our credit facility are deferred and amortized using the straight line method over the life of their respective facilities. Financing costs incurred in connection with our SBA debentures are deferred and amortized using the effective yield method over the life of the debentures.
In April 2015, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-03, InterestImputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (ASU 2015-03). The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, and early adoption is allowed, and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 as of February 28, 2015, by reclassifying deferred debt financing costs from within total assets to within total liabilities as a contra-liability. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2015-03 did not materially impact the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. Prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Contingencies
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may enter into contracts or agreements that contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of these provisions against the Company. Based on its history and experience, management feels that the likelihood of such an event is remote. Therefore, the Company has not accrued any liabilities in connection with such indemnifications.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may directly or indirectly be a defendant or plaintiff in legal actions with respect to bankruptcy, insolvency or other types of proceedings. Such lawsuits may involve claims that could adversely affect the value of certain financial instruments owned by the Company.
Income Taxes
The Company has filed an election to be treated for tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, among other things, intends to make the requisite distributions to its stockholders which will relieve the Company from federal income taxes. Therefore, no provision has been recorded for federal income taxes.
In order to qualify as a RIC, among other requirements, the Company is required to timely distribute to its stockholders at least 90.0% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each fiscal tax year. The Company will be subject to a nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax of 4.0% on undistributed income if it does not distribute at least 98.0% of its ordinary income in any calendar year and 98.2% of its capital gain net income for each one-year period ending on October 31.
F-75
Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4.0% excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions for excise tax purposes, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned.
In accordance with certain applicable Treasury regulations and private letter rulings issued by the Internal Revenue Service, a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC subject to a limitation on the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders, which limitation must be at least 20.0% of the aggregate declared distribution. If too many stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash will receive a pro rata amount of cash (with the balance of the distribution paid in stock). In no event will any stockholder, electing to receive cash, receive less than 20.0% of his or her entire distribution in cash. If these and certain other requirements are met, for U.S federal income tax purposes, the amount of the dividend paid in stock will be equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead of stock.
ASC 740, Income Taxes, (ASC 740), provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Companys tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions deemed to meet a more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current period. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations. During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2016, the Company did not incur any interest or penalties. Although we file federal and state tax returns, our major tax jurisdiction is federal. The 2013, 2014 and 2015 federal tax years for the Company remain subject to examination by the IRS. As of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, there were no uncertain tax positions. The Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next 12 months.
Dividends
Dividends to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the board of directors. Net realized capital gains, if any, are generally distributed at least annually, although we may decide to retain such capital gains for reinvestment.
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) that provides for reinvestment of our dividend distributions on behalf of our stockholders unless a stockholder elects to receive cash. As a result, if our board of directors authorizes, and we declare, a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not opted out of the DRIP by the dividend record date will have their cash dividends automatically reinvested into additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash dividends. We have the option to satisfy the share requirements of the DRIP through the issuance of new shares of common stock or through open market purchases of common stock by the DRIP plan administrator.
Capital Gains Incentive Fee
The Company records an expense accrual on the consolidated statements of operations, relating to the capital gains incentive fee payable on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, by the Company to its investment adviser when the net realized and unrealized gain on its investments exceed all net realized and unrealized capital losses on its investments given the fact that a capital gains incentive fee would be owed to the investment adviser if the Company were to liquidate its investment portfolio at such time. The actual incentive fee payable to the Companys investment adviser related to capital gains will be determined and payable in arrears at the end of each fiscal year and will include only realized capital gains net of realized and unrealized losses for the period.
F-76
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial InstrumentsOverall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01). ASU 2016-01 retains many current requirements for the classification and measurement of financial instruments; however, it significantly revises an entitys accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. ASU 2016-01 also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted for public business entities. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard has on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, InterestImputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (ASU 2015-15). ASU 2015-15 updates the accounting guidance included in ASU 2015-03, InterestImputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The updated accounting guidance provided by ASU 2015-15 was the result of the Emerging Issues Task Force meeting, held on June 18, 2015, at which the SEC staff stated that the SEC would not object to an entity deferring and presenting costs related to revolving debt arrangements as an asset. As the Company previously adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 and reclassified all deferred debt financing costs from within total assets to within total liabilities as a contra-liability effective as of February 28, 2015, it has chosen not to avail itself of the updated accounting treatment provided by ASU 2015-15 and continues to include all deferred financing costs as a contra-liability within total liabilities.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (ASU 2015-02). ASU 2015-02 significantly changes the consolidation analysis required under GAAP and ends the deferral granted to investment companies from applying the variable interest entity guidance. ASU 2015-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is permitted. Management does not believe these changes will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that requires management to assess an entitys ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. The amendments provide a definition of the term substantial doubt and include principles for considering the mitigating effect of managements plans. The amendments also require an evaluation every reporting period, including interim periods for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued), and certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated or not alleviated. The amendments in this update are effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016. Management does not believe these changes will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). Under the new guidance, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early application is not permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact these changes will have on the Companys consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
F-77
Risk Management
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company manages a variety of risks, including market risk and credit risk. Market risk is the risk of potential adverse changes to the value of investments because of changes in market conditions such as interest rate movements and volatility in investment prices.
Credit risk is the risk of default or non-performance by portfolio companies, equivalent to the investments carrying amount.
The Company is also exposed to credit risk related to maintaining all of its cash and cash equivalents, including those in reserve accounts, at a major financial institution and credit risk related to any of its derivative counterparties.
The Company has investments in lower rated and comparable quality unrated high yield bonds and bank loans. Investments in high yield investments are accompanied by a greater degree of credit risk. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer is significantly greater for holders of high yield securities, because such investments are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.
Note 3. Investments
As noted above, the Company values all investments in accordance with ASC 820. ASC 820 requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value. As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
ASC 820 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability of inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide disclosures on fair value measurements according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the observability of the inputs used to determine fair values. Investments carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
| Level 1Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. |
| Level 2Valuations based on inputs other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable. |
| Level 3Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The inputs used in the determination of fair value may require significant management judgment or estimation. Such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by disclaimer would result in classification as Level 3 asset, assuming no additional corroborating evidence. |
In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, the Company continues to employ the valuation policy approved by the board of directors that is consistent with ASC 820 and the 1940 Act (see Note 2). Consistent with our Companys valuation policy, we evaluate the source of inputs, including any markets in which our investments are trading, in determining fair value.
F-78
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of February 29, 2016 (dollars in thousands), according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | | $ | | $ | 11,868 | $ | 11,868 | ||||||||
First lien term loans |
| | 144,643 | 144,643 | ||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
| | 88,178 | 88,178 | ||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
| | 12,828 | 12,828 | ||||||||||||
Equity interest |
| | 26,479 | 26,479 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | | $ | 283,996 | $ | 283,996 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of February 28, 2015 (dollars in thousands), according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | | $ | | $ | 18,302 | $ | 18,302 | ||||||||
First lien term loans |
| | 145,207 | 145,207 | ||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
| | 35,603 | 35,603 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured notes |
| | 4,230 | 4,230 | ||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
| | 17,031 | 17,031 | ||||||||||||
Equity interest |
| | 20,165 | 20,165 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | | $ | 240,538 | $ | 240,538 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the year ended February 29, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Syndicated loans |
First lien term loans |
Second lien term loans |
Unsecured notes |
Structured finance securities |
Common stock/ equities |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of February 28, 2015 |
$ | 18,302 | $ | 145,207 | $ | 35,603 | $ | 4,230 | $ | 17,031 | $ | 20,165 | $ | 240,538 | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(1,914 | ) | (1,850 | ) | (1,163 | ) | 3,136 | (1,281 | ) | 3,813 | 741 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases and other adjustments to cost |
56 | 35,854 | 72,422 | 670 | | 1,663 | 110,665 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and redemptions |
(4,607 | ) | (31,280 | ) | (19,502 | ) | (5,917 | ) | (2,922 | ) | (3,946 | ) | (68,174 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investments |
31 | (865 | ) | 187 | (2,220 | ) | | 3,093 | 226 | |||||||||||||||||||
Transfers In |
| | 631 | 101 | | 1,691 | 2,423 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers Out |
| (2,423 | ) | | | | | (2,423 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance as of February 29, 2016 |
$ | 11,868 | $ | 144,643 | $ | 88,178 | $ | | $ | 12,828 | $ | 26,479 | $ | 283,996 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and other adjustments to cost include purchases of new investments at cost, effects of refinancing/restructuring, accretion/amortization of income from discount/premium on debt securities, and PIK.
Sales and redemptions represent net proceeds received from investments sold, and principal paydowns received, during the period.
F-79
Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which transfers occur.
The net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for the year ended February 29, 2016 on investments still held as of February 29, 2016 is ($2,798,986) and is included in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the consolidated statements of operations.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the year ended February 28, 2015 (dollars in thousands):
Syndicated loans |
First lien term loans |
Second lien term loans |
Unsecured notes |
Structured finance securities |
Common stock/ equities |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of February 28, 2014 |
$ | 32,390 | $ | 110,278 | $ | 27,804 | $ | 5,471 | $ | 19,570 | $ | 10,332 | $ | 205,845 | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(763 | ) | (206 | ) | (409 | ) | (1,458 | ) | (1,936 | ) | 2,829 | (1,943 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Purchases and other adjustments to cost |
56 | 83,456 | 18,667 | 217 | | 4,221 | 106,617 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and redemptions |
(13,461 | ) | (42,445 | ) | (10,522 | ) | | (603 | ) | (6,226 | ) | (73,257 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain from investments |
80 | 387 | 63 | | | 2,746 | 3,276 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers In |
| | | | | 6,263 | 6,263 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers Out |
| (6,263 | ) | | | | | (6,263 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance as of February 28, 2015 |
$ | 18,302 | $ | 145,207 | $ | 35,603 | $ | 4,230 | $ | 17,031 | $ | 20,165 | $ | 240,538 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and other adjustments to cost include purchases of new investments at cost, effects of refinancing/restructuring, accretion/amortization of income from discount/premium on debt securities, and PIK.
Sales and redemptions represent net proceeds received from investments sold, and principal paydowns received, during the period.
Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which transfers occur.
The net change in unrealized gain/(loss) for the year ended February 28, 2015 on investments still held as of February 28, 2015 is ($1,456,791) and is included in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the consolidated statements of operations.
The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of assets as of February 29, 2016 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Fair Value | Valuation Technique |
Unobservable Input |
Range | |||||||
Syndicated loans |
11,868 | Market Comparables | Third-Party Bid | 72.5% - 98.2% | ||||||
First lien term loans |
144,643 | Market Comparables | Market Yield (%) | 6.8% - 15.5% | ||||||
EBITDA Multiples (x) | 1.0x | |||||||||
Revenue Multiples Third-Party Bid | 91.3 - 98.9 | |||||||||
Second lien term loans |
88,178 | Market Comparables | Market Yield (%) | 0.0% - 15.0% | ||||||
Third-Party Bid | 91.5% - 98.6% | |||||||||
Structured finance securities |
12,828 | Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate (%) | 20.0% | ||||||
Equity interests |
26,479 | Market Comparables | EBITDA Multiples (x) Revenue Multiples | 6.8x - 16.4x |
F-80
The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of assets as of February 28, 2015 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Fair Value | Valuation Technique |
Unobservable Input |
Range | |||||||
Syndicated loans |
18,302 | Market Comparables | Third-Party Bid | 93.6% - 100.4% | ||||||
First lien term loans |
145,207 | Market Comparables | Market Yield (%) | 5.8% - 17.7% | ||||||
EBITDA Multiples (x) | 3.0x | |||||||||
Third-Party Bid | 79.3 - 105.0 | |||||||||
Second lien term loans |
35,603 | Market Comparables | Market Yield (%) | 8.5% - 15.0% | ||||||
Third-Party Bid | 98.3% - 98.3% | |||||||||
Unsecured notes |
4,230 | Market Comparables | Market Yield (%) | 13.2% - 20.3% | ||||||
Structured finance securities |
17,031 | Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate (%) | 12.0% | ||||||
Equity interests |
20,165 | Market Comparables | EBITDA Multiples (x) | 5.0x - 12.1x |
For investments utilizing a market comparables valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the market yield, in isolation, would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement, and a significant increase (decrease) in any of the EBITDA valuation multiples, in isolation, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. For investments utilizing a discounted cash flow valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the discount rate, in isolation, would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. For investments utilizing a market quote in deriving a value, a significant increase (decrease) in the market quote, in isolation, would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
The composition of our investments as of February 29, 2016, at amortized cost and fair value were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Investments at Amortized Cost |
Amortized Cost Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | 14,138 | 5.0 | % | $ | 11,868 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||
First lien term loans |
146,246 | 52.0 | 144,643 | 50.9 | ||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
89,486 | 31.9 | 88,178 | 31.1 | ||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
13,031 | 4.6 | 12,828 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||
Equity interest |
18,275 | 6.5 | 26,479 | 9.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 281,176 | 100.0 | % | $ | 283,996 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of our investments as of February 28, 2015, at amortized cost and fair value were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Investments at Amortized Cost |
Amortized Cost Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||
Syndicated loans |
$ | 18,658 | 7.8 | % | $ | 18,302 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||
First lien term loans |
144,959 | 60.8 | 145,207 | 60.3 | ||||||||||||
Second lien term loans |
35,748 | 15.0 | 35,603 | 14.8 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured notes |
7,366 | 3.1 | 4,230 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
Structured finance securities |
15,953 | 6.7 | 17,031 | 7.1 | ||||||||||||
Equity interest |
15,774 | 6.6 | 20,165 | 8.4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 238,458 | 100.0 | % | $ | 240,538 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For loans and debt securities for which market quotations are not available, we determine their fair value based on third party indicative broker quotes, where available, or the assumptions that a hypothetical market
F-81
participant would use to value the security in a current hypothetical sale using a market yield valuation methodology. In applying the market yield valuation methodology, we determine the fair value based on such factors as market participant assumptions including synthetic credit ratings, estimated remaining life, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. If, in our judgment, the market yield methodology is not sufficient or appropriate, we may use additional methodologies such as an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
For equity securities of portfolio companies and partnership interests, we determine the fair value based on the market approach with value then attributed to equity or equity like securities using the enterprise value waterfall valuation methodology. Under the enterprise value waterfall valuation methodology, we determine the enterprise fair value of the portfolio company and then waterfall the enterprise value over the portfolio companys securities in order of their preference relative to one another. To estimate the enterprise value of the portfolio company, we weigh some or all of the traditional market valuation methods and factors based on the individual circumstances of the portfolio company in order to estimate the enterprise value. The methodologies for performing investments may be based on, among other things: valuations of comparable public companies, recent sales of private and public comparable companies, discounting the forecasted cash flows of the portfolio company, third party valuations of the portfolio company, considering offers from third parties to buy the company, estimating the value to potential strategic buyers and considering the value of recent investments in the equity securities of the portfolio company. For non-performing investments, we may estimate the liquidation or collateral value of the portfolio companys assets and liabilities. We also take into account historical and anticipated financial results.
Our investment in Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (Saratoga CLO) is carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for equity interests in collateralized loan obligation funds similar to Saratoga CLO, when available, as determined by our Manager and recommended to our board of directors. Specifically, we use Intex cash flow models, or an appropriate substitute, to form the basis for the valuation of our investment in Saratoga CLO. The models use a set of assumptions including projected default rates, recovery rates, reinvestment rate and prepayment rates in order to arrive at estimated valuations. The assumptions are based on available market data and projections provided by third parties as well as management estimates. For the quarter ended November 30, 2013, in connection with the refinancing of the Saratoga CLO liabilities, we ran Intex models based on assumptions about the refinanced Saratoga CLOs structure, including capital structure, cost of liabilities and reinvestment period. We use the output from the Intex models (i.e., the estimated cash flows) to perform a discounted cash flows analysis on expected future cash flows to determine a valuation for our investment in Saratoga CLO at February 29, 2016. The significant inputs for the valuation model include:
| Default rates: 2.0% |
| Recovery rates: 35-70% |
| Prepayment rate: 20.0% |
| Reinvestment rate / price: L+375bps / $97.00 Year 1, $99.00 thereafter. |
Note 4. Investment in Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (Saratoga CLO)
On January 22, 2008, we invested $30 million in all of the outstanding subordinated notes of GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd., a collateralized loan obligation fund managed by us that invests primarily in senior secured loans. Additionally, we entered into a collateral management agreement with GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd. pursuant to which we act as collateral manager to it. The Saratoga CLO was refinanced in October 2013 and its reinvestment period ends in October 2016. The Saratoga CLO remains 100% owned and managed by Saratoga Investment Corp. We receive a base management fee of 0.25% and a subordinated management fee of 0.25% of the fee basis amount at the beginning of the collection period, paid quarterly to the
F-82
extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee equal to 20.0% of the remaining interest proceeds and principal proceeds, if any, after the subordinated notes have realized the incentive management fee target return of 12.0%, in accordance with the Priority of Payments after making the prior distributions on the relevant payment date. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, we accrued $1.5 million, $1.5 million, and $1.8 million in management fee income, respectively, and $2.7 million, $2.7 million, and $3.4 million in interest income, respectively, from Saratoga CLO. We did not accrue any amounts related to the incentive management fee as the 12.0% hurdle rate has not yet been achieved.
At February 29, 2016, the Company determined that the fair value of its investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO was $12.8 million. The Company determines the fair value of its investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO based on the present value of the projected future cash flows of the subordinated notes over the life of Saratoga CLO. At February 29, 2016, Saratoga CLO had investments with a principal balance of $302.7 million and a weighted average spread over LIBOR of 4.3%, and had debt with a principal balance of $282.4 million with a weighted average spread over LIBOR of 1.8%. As a result, Saratoga CLO earns a spread between the interest income it receives on its investments and the interest expense it pays on its debt and other operating expenses, which is distributed quarterly to the Company as the holder of its subordinated notes. At February 29, 2016, the total spread, or projected future cash flows of the subordinated notes, over the life of Saratoga CLO was $13.1 million, which had a present value of approximately $12.8 million, using a 20.0% discount rate.
At February 28, 2015, the Company determined that the fair value of its investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO was $17.0 million. The Company determines the fair value of its investment in the subordinated notes of Saratoga CLO based on the present value of the projected future cash flows of the subordinated notes over the life of Saratoga CLO. At February 28, 2015, Saratoga CLO had investments with a principal balance of $296.9 million and a weighted average spread over LIBOR of 4.3%, and had debt with a principal balance of $282.4 million with a weighted average spread over LIBOR of 1.8%. As a result, Saratoga CLO earns a spread between the interest income it receives on its investments and the interest expense it pays on its debt and other operating expenses, which is distributed quarterly to the Company as the holder of its subordinated notes. At February 28, 2015, the total spread, or projected future cash flows of the subordinated notes, over the life of Saratoga CLO was $17.3 million, which had a present value of approximately $17.0 million, using a 12.0% discount rate.
The separate audited financial statements of Saratoga CLO as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, pursuant to Rule 3-09 of SEC rules Regulation S-X, and for the twelve months ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014, are presented on page S-1.
Note 5. Income Taxes
The Company intends to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, as such, will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders.
The Company owns 100.0% of Saratoga CLO, an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. For financial reporting purposes, the Saratoga CLO is not included as part of the consolidated financial statements. For federal income tax purposes, the Company has requested and received approval from the Internal Revenue Service to treat the Saratoga CLO as a disregarded entity. As such, for federal income tax purposes and for purposes of meeting the RIC qualification and diversification tests, the results of operations of the Saratoga CLO are included with those of the Company.
To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required to meet certain income and asset diversification tests in addition to distributing at least 90.0% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code.
F-83
Because federal income tax regulations differ from U.S. GAAP, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary in nature. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes. As of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the Company reclassified for book purposes amounts arising from permanent book/tax differences primarily related to nondeductible excise tax, meals & entertainment, market discount, interest income with respect to the Saratoga CLO which is consolidated for tax purposes, and the tax character of distributions as follows (dollars in thousands):
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
|||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 55 | $ | (299 | ) | |||
Accumulated net realized gains on investments |
59 | 593 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital |
(114 | ) | (294 | ) |
For income tax purposes, distributions paid to shareholders are reported as ordinary income, return of capital, long term capital gains or a combination thereof. The tax character of distributions paid for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||
Ordinary Income |
$ | 13,045 | $ | 2,157 | $ | 12,535 | ||||||
Capital gains |
| | | |||||||||
Return of capital |
| | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 13,045 | $ | 2,157 | $ | 12,535 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
For federal income tax purposes, as of February 29, 2016, the aggregate net unrealized depreciation for all securities is $15.4 million. The aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes is $571.4 million.
For federal income tax purposes, as of February 28, 2015, the aggregate net unrealized depreciation for all securities is $3.6 million. The aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes is $522.4 million.
At February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the components of accumulated losses on a tax basis as detailed below differ from the amounts reflected per the Companys consolidated statements of assets and liabilities by temporary book/tax differences primarily arising from the consolidation of the Saratoga CLO for tax purposes, market discount and original issue discount income, interest income accrual on defaulted bonds, write-off of investments, and amortization of organizational expenditures (dollars in thousands).
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
|||||||
Post October loss deferred |
$ | | $ | (27,303 | ) | |||
Accumulated capital losses |
(58,929 | ) | (32,308 | ) | ||||
Other temporary differences |
(1,941 | ) | (2,684 | ) | ||||
Undistributed ordinary income |
8,103 | 10,578 | ||||||
Unrealized depreciation |
(15,428 | ) | (3,662 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total components of accumulated losses |
$ | (68,195 | ) | $ | (55,379 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
The Company has incurred capital losses of $19.3 million and $13.0 million, respectively, for the years ended February 28, 2011 and 2010. Such capital losses will be available to offset future capital gains if any and if unused, will expire on February 28, 2019 and 2018.
F-84
At February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the Company had a short term capital loss of $11.2 million and $0 million, respectively, and a long-term capital loss of $15.4 million and $0 million, respectively, available to offset future capital gains. Post RIC-modernization act losses are deemed to arise on the first day of the funds following fiscal year and there is no expiration for these losses.
The Company is subject to a nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax of 4% on undistributed income if it does not distribute at least 98% of its ordinary income in any calendar year and 98.2% of its capital gain net income for each one-year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year. Depending on the level of Investment Company Taxable Income (ICTI) earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to carry forward ICTI in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions for excise tax purposes, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned. Any such carryover ICTI must be distributed before the end of that next tax year through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which generated such ICTI. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2015, the Company did not distribute at least 98% of its ordinary income and 98.2% of its capital gains and subsequently paid $113,808 in federal excise taxes.
Management has analyzed the Companys tax positions taken on federal income tax returns for all open years (fiscal years 2013-2016), and has concluded that no provision for uncertain income tax positions is required in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
On December 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the Modernization Act) was enacted, and the provisions with the Modernization Act are effective for the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012. The Modernization Act is the first major piece of legislation affecting RICs since 1986 and it modernizes several of the federal income and excise tax provisions related to RICs. Some highlights of the enacted provisions are as follows:
New capital losses may now be carried forward indefinitely, and retain the character of the original loss. Under pre-enactment law, capital losses could be carried forward for eight years, and carried forward as short-term capital, irrespective of the character of the original loss.
The Modernization Act contains simplification provisions, which are aimed at preventing disqualification of a RIC for inadvertent failures of the asset diversification and/or qualifying income tests. Additionally, the Modernization Act exempts RICs from the preferential dividend rule, and repealed the 60-day designation requirement for certain types of pay-through income and gains.
Finally, the Modernization Act contains several provisions aimed at preserving the character of distributions made by a fiscal year RIC during the portion of its taxable year ending after October 31 or December 31, reducing the circumstances under which a RIC might be required to file amended Forms 1099 to restate previously reported distributions.
SIA-Avionte, Inc., SIA-Mercury, Inc., SIA-TT, Inc., and SIA-Vector, Inc., 100% owned by the Company, are each filing standalone C Corporate tax returns for federal and state purposes. As separately regarded entities for tax purposes, these entities are taxed at normal corporate rates. For tax purposes, any distributions by the entities to the parent company would generally need to be distributed to the Companys shareholders. Generally, such distributions of the entities income to the Companys shareholders will be considered as qualified dividends for tax purposes. The entities taxable net income will differ from U.S. GAAP net income because of deferred tax temporary differences adjustments. Deferred tax temporary differences may include differences for state taxes and joint venture interests.
F-85
Note 6. Agreements and Related Party Transactions
On July 30, 2010, the Company entered into the Management Agreement with our Manager. The initial term of the Management Agreement is two years, with automatic, one-year renewals at the end of each year subject to certain approvals by our board of directors and/or our stockholders. On July 8, 2015, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Management Agreement for an additional one-year term. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, our Manager implements our business strategy on a day-to-day basis and performs certain services for us, subject to oversight by our board of directors. Our Manager is responsible for, among other duties, determining investment criteria, sourcing, analyzing and executing investments transactions, asset sales, financings and performing asset management duties. Under the Management Agreement, we have agreed to pay our Manager a management fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of a base management fee and an incentive fee.
The base management fee of 1.75% is calculated based on the average value of our gross assets (other than cash or cash equivalents, but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) at the end of the two most recently completed fiscal quarters.
The incentive fee consists of the following two parts:
The first, payable quarterly in arrears, equals 20.0% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets at the end of the immediately preceding quarter, that exceeds a 1.875% quarterly (7.5% annualized) hurdle rate measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter, subject to a catch-up provision. Under this provision, in any fiscal quarter, our Manager receives no incentive fee unless our pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds the hurdle rate of 1.875%. Our Manager will receive 100.0% of pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.344% in any fiscal quarter (9.376% annualized); and 20.0% of the amount of the our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 2.344% in any fiscal quarter (9.376% annualized).
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Management Agreement) and equals 20.0% of our incentive fee capital gains, which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from May 31, 2010 through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee. Importantly, the capital gains portion of the incentive fee is based on realized gains and realized and unrealized losses from May 31, 2010. Therefore, realized and unrealized losses incurred prior to such time will not be taken into account when calculating the capital gains portion of the incentive fee, and our Manager will be entitled to 20.0% of incentive fee capital gains that arise after May 31, 2010. In addition, for the purpose of the incentive fee capital gains calculations, the cost basis for computing realized gains and losses on investments held by us as of May 31, 2010 will equal the fair value of such investments as of such date.
For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, the Company incurred $4.5 million, $4.2 million and $3.3 million in base management fees, respectively. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, the Company incurred $2.3 million, $2.2 million and $1.0 million in incentive fees related to pre-incentive fee net investment income. For the year ended February 29, 2016, there was a reduction of $0.05 million in incentive fees related to capital gains. For the year ended February 28, 2015, we accrued of $0.3 million in incentive fees related to capital gains. For the year ended February 28, 2014, there was a reduction of $0.1 million in incentive fees related to capital gains. The accrual is calculated using both realized and unrealized capital gains for the period. The actual incentive fee related to capital gains will be determined and payable in arrears at the end of the fiscal year and will include only realized capital gains for the period. As of February 29, 2016, the base management fees accrual was $1.2 million and the incentive fees accrual was $4.4 million and is included in base management and incentive fees payable in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. As of February 28, 2015, the base management
F-86
fees accrual was $1.0 million and the incentive fees accrual was $4.8 million and is included in base management and incentive fees payable in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities.
On July 30, 2010, the Company entered into a separate administration agreement (the Administration Agreement) with our Manager, pursuant to which our Manager, as our administrator, has agreed to furnish us with the facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations and provide managerial assistance on our behalf to those portfolio companies to which we are required to provide such assistance. The initial term of the Administration Agreement was two years, with automatic, one-year renewals at the end of each year subject to certain approvals by our board of directors and/or our stockholders. The amount of expenses payable or reimbursable thereunder by the Company was capped at $1.0 million for the initial two year term of the administration agreement and subsequent renewals. On July 8, 2015, our board of directors approved the renewal of the Administration Agreement for an additional one-year term and determined to increase the cap on the payment or reimbursement of expenses by the Company thereunder, which had not been increased since the inception of the agreement, to $1.3 million. In addition, our board of directors intends to review the new cap in the next three to six months to determine whether it should be further adjusted in light of differences between our projected and actual expenses and other similar factors.
For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, we recognized $1.2 million, $1.0 million and $1.0 million, in administrator expenses for the periods, respectively, pertaining to bookkeeping, record keeping and other administrative services provided to us in addition to our allocable portion of rent and other overhead related expenses. As of February 29, 2016, $0.2 million of administrator expenses were accrued and included in due to manager in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. As of February 28, 2015, $0.4 million of administrator expenses were accrued and included in due to manager in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014, the Company bought investments fair valued at $0.0 million, $0.0 million, and $0.3 million, respectively, from the Saratoga CLO and sold no investments to related parties.
Note 7. Borrowings
Credit Facility
As a BDC, we are only allowed to employ leverage to the extent that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200.0% after giving effect to such leverage. The amount of leverage that we employ at any time depends on our assessment of the market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing.
On April 11, 2007, we entered into a $100.0 million revolving securitized credit facility (the Revolving Facility). On May 1, 2007, we entered into a $25.7 million term securitized credit facility (the Term Facility and, together with the Revolving Facility, the Facilities), which was fully drawn at closing. In December 2007, we consolidated the Facilities by using a draw under the Revolving Facility to repay the Term Facility. In response to the market wide decline in financial asset prices, which negatively affected the value of our portfolio, we terminated the revolving period of the Revolving Facility effective January 14, 2009 and commenced a two-year amortization period during which all principal proceeds from the collateral was used to repay outstanding borrowings. A significant percentage of our total assets had been pledged under the Revolving Facility to secure our obligations thereunder. Under the Revolving Facility, funds were borrowed from or through certain lenders and interest was payable monthly at the greater of the commercial paper rate and our lenders prime rate plus 4.00% plus a default rate of 2.00% or, if the commercial paper market was unavailable, the greater of the prevailing LIBOR rates and our lenders prime rate plus 6.00% plus a default rate of 3.00%.
In March 2009, we amended the Revolving Facility to increase the portion of the portfolio that could be invested in CCC rated investments in return for an increased interest rate and expedited amortization. As a result of these transactions, we expected to have additional cushion under our borrowing base under the Revolving Facility that would allow us to better manage our capital in times of declining asset prices and market dislocation.
F-87
On July 30, 2009, we exceeded the permissible borrowing limit under the Revolving Facility for 30 consecutive days, resulting in an event of default under the Revolving Facility. As a result of this event of default, our lender had the right to accelerate repayment of the outstanding indebtedness under the Revolving Facility and to foreclose and liquidate the collateral pledged thereunder. Acceleration of the outstanding indebtedness and/or liquidation of the collateral could have had a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and operations.
On July 30, 2010, we used the net proceeds from (i) the stock purchase transaction and (ii) a portion of the funds available to us under the $45.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility) with Madison Capital Funding LLC, in each case, to pay the full amount of principal and accrued interest, including default interest, outstanding under the Revolving Facility. As a result, the Revolving Facility was terminated in connection therewith. Substantially all of our total assets, other than those held by SBIC LP, have been pledged under the Credit Facility to secure our obligations thereunder.
On February 24, 2012, we amended our senior secured revolving credit facility with Madison Capital Funding LLC to, among other things:
| expand the borrowing capacity under the credit facility from $40.0 million to $45.0 million; |
| extend the period during which we may make and repay borrowings under the credit facility from July 30, 2013 to February 24, 2015 (the Revolving Period). The Revolving Period may upon the occurrence of an event of default, by action of the lenders or automatically. All borrowings and other amounts payable under the credit facility are due and payable five years after the end of the Revolving Period; and |
| remove the condition that we may not acquire additional loan assets without the prior written consent of Madison Capital Funding LLC. |
On September 17, 2014, we entered into a second amendment to the Revolving Facility with Madison Capital Funding LLC to, among other things:
| extend the commitment termination date from February 24, 2015 to September 17, 2017; |
| extend the maturity date of the Revolving Facility from February 24, 2020 to September 17, 2022 (unless terminated sooner upon certain events); |
| reduce the applicable margin rate on base rate borrowings from 4.50% to 3.75%, and on LIBOR borrowings from 5.50% to 4.75%; and |
| reduce the floor on base rate borrowings from 3.00% to 2.25%; and on LIBOR borrowings from 2.00% to 1.25%. |
As of February 29, 2016, there was no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and the Company was in compliance with all of the limitations and requirements of the Credit Facility. As of February 28, 2015, there was $9.6 million outstanding under the Credit Facility and the Company was in compliance with all of the limitations and requirements of the Credit Facility. Financing costs of $2.7 million related to the Credit Facility have been capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the facility. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, we recorded $0.7 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million of interest expense, respectively. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, we recorded $0.1 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Credit Facility and Revolving Facility, respectively. The interest rates during the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 on the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility were 6.00%, 6.75% and 7.50%, respectively. During the years ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the average dollar amount of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was $4.4 million and $6.0 million, respectively.
F-88
The Credit Facility contains limitations as to how borrowed funds may be used, such as restrictions on industry concentrations, asset size, weighted average life, currency denomination and collateral interests. The Credit Facility also includes certain requirements relating to portfolio performance, the violation of which could result in the limit of further advances and, in some cases, result in an event of default, allowing the lenders to accelerate repayment of amounts owed thereunder. The Credit Facility has an eight year term, consisting of a three year period (the Revolving Period), under which the Company may make and repay borrowings, and a final maturity five years from the end of the Revolving Period. Availability on the Credit Facility will be subject to a borrowing base calculation, based on, among other things, applicable advance rates (which vary from 50.0% to 75.0% of par or fair value depending on the type of loan asset) and the value of certain eligible loan assets included as part of the Borrowing Base. Funds may be borrowed at the greater of the prevailing LIBOR rate and 2.00%, plus an applicable margin of 5.50%. At the Companys option, funds may be borrowed based on an alternative base rate, which in no event will be less than 3.00%, and the applicable margin over such alternative base rate is 4.50%. In addition, the Company will pay the lenders a commitment fee of 0.75% per year on the unused amount of the Credit Facility for the duration of the Revolving Period.
Our borrowing base under the Credit Facility was $21.8 million subject to the Credit Facility cap of $45.0 million at February 29, 2016. For purposes of determining the borrowing base, most assets are assigned the values set forth in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC. Accordingly, the February 29, 2016 borrowing base relies upon the valuations set forth in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2015. The valuations presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K will not be incorporated into the borrowing base until after this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the SEC.
SBA Debentures
SBIC LP is able to borrow funds from the SBA against regulatory capital (which approximates equity capital) that is paid in and is subject to customary regulatory requirements including but not limited to an examination by the SBA. As of February 29, 2016, we have funded SBIC LP with $75.0 million of equity capital, and have $103.7 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. SBA debentures are non-recourse to us, have a 10-year maturity, and may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA debentures is fixed at the time of issuance, often referred to as pooling, at a market-driven spread over 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes. SBA current regulations limit the amount that SBIC LP may borrow to a maximum of $150.0 million, which is up to twice its potential regulatory capital.
SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses. Under present SBA regulations, eligible small businesses include businesses that have a tangible net worth not exceeding $19.5 million and have average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $6.5 million for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, an SBIC must devote 25.0% of its investment activity to smaller concerns as defined by the SBA. A smaller concern is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6.0 million and has average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $2.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the number of employees and gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans to small businesses, invest in the equity securities of such businesses and provide them with consulting and advisory services.
SBIC LP is subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that SBIC LP will receive SBA guaranteed debenture funding, which is dependent upon SBIC LP continuing to be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies. The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to SBIC LPs assets over our stockholders and debtholders in the event we liquidate SBIC LP or the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by SBIC LP upon an event of default.
F-89
The Company received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission to permit it to exclude the debt of SBIC LP guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200.0% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows the Company increased flexibility under the 200.0% asset coverage test by permitting it to borrow up to $150.0 million more than it would otherwise be able to absent the receipt of this exemptive relief.
As of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, there was $103.7 million and $79.0 million outstanding of SBA debentures, respectively. The carrying amount of the amount outstanding of SBA debentures approximates its fair value, which is based on a waterfall analysis showing adequate collateral coverage, $3.6 million, of financing costs related to the SBA debentures, have been capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the commitment and drawdown. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 we recorded $2.6 million, $2.0 million and $1.3 million of interest expense related to the SBA debentures, respectively. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, we recorded $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the SBA debentures, respectively. The weighted average interest rate during the years ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 on the outstanding borrowings of the SBA debentures was 3.12% and 2.93%, respectively. During the years ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the average dollar amount of SBA debentures outstanding was $83.0 million and $67.9 million, respectively.
In December 2015, the 2016 omnibus spending bill approved by Congress and signed into law by the President increased the amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures that affiliated SBIC funds can have outstanding from $225.0 million to $350.0 million, subject to SBA approval. SBA regulations currently limit the amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures that an SBIC may issue to $150.0 million when it has at least $75.0 million in regulatory capital. Affiliated SBICs are permitted to issue up to a combined maximum amount of $350.0 million in SBA-guaranteed debentures when they have at least $175.0 million in combined regulatory capital.
On April 2, 2015, the SBA issued a green light or go forth letter inviting us to continue our application process to obtain a license to form and operate its second SBIC subsidiary. If approved, a second SBIC license would provide us an incremental source of long-term capital by permitting us to issue up to $150 million of additional SBA-guaranteed debentures in addition to the $150 million already approved under the first license. Receipt of a green light letter from the SBA does not assure an applicant that the SBA will ultimately issue an SBIC license and we have received no assurance or indication from the SBA that it will receive an SBIC license, or of the timeframe in which it would receive a license, should one be granted.
Notes
On May 10, 2013, the Company issued $42.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.50% fixed-rate notes due 2020 (the Notes). The Notes will mature on May 31, 2020, and may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at the Companys option on or after May 31, 2016. Interest will be payable quarterly beginning August 15, 2013.
On May 17, 2013, the Company closed an additional $6.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes, pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional Notes. On May 29, 2015, the Company entered into a Debt Distribution Agreement with Landenburg Thalmann & Co. through which the Company may offer for sale, from time to time, up to $20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes through an At-the-Market (ATM) offering. As of February 29, 2016, the Company sold 539,725 bonds with a principal of $13,493,125 at an average price of $25.31 for aggregate net proceeds of $13,385,766 (net of transaction costs).
As of February 29, 2016, the carrying amount and fair value of the Notes was $61.8 million and $60.2 million, respectively. The fair value of the Notes, which are publicly traded, is based upon closing market quotes as of the measurement date and would be classified as a level 1 liability within the fair value hierarchy. As
F-90
of February 29, 2016, $2.7 million of financing costs related to the Notes (including underwriting commissions and net of issuance premiums) have been capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the Notes. For the year ended February 29, 2016, we recorded $4.3 million of interest expense and $0.4 million of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Notes. As of February 28, 2015, the carrying amount and fair value of the Notes was $48.3 million and $49.8 million, respectively. As of February 28, 2015, $2.5 million of financing costs related to the Notes have been capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the Notes. For the years ended February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, we recorded $3.6 million and $2.9 million of interest expense, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Notes. During the years ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the average dollar amount of Notes outstanding was $55.7 million and $48.3 million, respectively.
Note 8. Commitments and contingencies
Contractual obligations
The following table shows our payment obligations for repayment of debt and other contractual obligations at February 29, 2016:
Payment Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less Than 1 Year |
1 - 3 Years |
3 - 5 Years |
More Than 5 Years |
||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
$ | 165,453 | $ | | $ | | $ | 61,793 | $ | 103,660 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet arrangements
The Companys off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $2.0 million and $11.2 million of unfunded commitments to provide debt financing to its portfolio companies or to fund limited partnership interests as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, respectively. Such commitments are generally up to the Companys discretion to approve, or the satisfaction of certain financial and nonfinancial covenants and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Companys consolidated statements of assets and liabilities and are not reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
A summary of the composition of the unfunded commitments as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 is shown in the table below (dollars in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
|||||||
Avionte Holdings, LLC |
$ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | ||||
Identity Automation |
1,000 | | ||||||
Bristol Hospice, LLC |
| 7,500 | ||||||
HMN Holdco, LLC |
| 2,400 | ||||||
Knowland Technology Holdings, L.L.C. |
| 300 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 2,000 | $ | 11,200 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Note 9. Directors Fees
The independent directors receive an annual fee of $40,000. They also receive $2,500 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting and receive $1,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each committee meeting. In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $5,000 and the
F-91
chairman of each other committee receives an annual fee of $2,000 for their additional services in these capacities. In addition, we have purchased directors and officers liability insurance on behalf of our directors and officers. Independent directors have the option to receive their directors fees in the form of our common stock issued at a price per share equal to the greater of net asset value or the market price at the time of payment. No compensation is paid to directors who are interested persons of the Company (as such term is defined in the 1940 Act). For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, we accrued $0.2 million, $0.2 million, and $0.2 million for directors fees expense, respectively. As of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, $0.03 million and $0.03 million in directors fees expense were unpaid and included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. As of February 29, 2016, we had not issued any common stock to our directors as compensation for their services.
Note 10. Stockholders Equity
On May 16, 2006, GSC Group, Inc. capitalized the LLC, by contributing $1,000 in exchange for 67 shares, constituting all of the issued and outstanding shares of the LLC.
On March 20, 2007, the Company issued 95,995.5 and 8,136.2 shares of common stock, priced at $150.00 per share, to GSC Group and certain individual employees of GSC Group, respectively, in exchange for the general partnership interest and a limited partnership interest in GSC Partners CDO III GP, LP, collectively valued at $15.6 million. At this time, the 6.7 shares owned by GSC Group in the LLC were exchanged for 6.7 shares of the Company.
On March 28, 2007, the Company completed its IPO of 725,000 shares of common stock, priced at $150.00 per share, before underwriting discounts and commissions. Total proceeds received from the IPO, net of $7.1 million in underwriters discount and commissions, and $1.0 million in offering costs, were $100.7 million.
On November 13, 2009, we declared a dividend of $18.25 per share payable on December 31, 2009. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to $2.1 million or $2.50 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $2.1 million in cash and 864,872.5 of newly issued shares of common stock.
On July 30, 2010, our Manager and its affiliates purchased 986,842 shares of common stock at $15.20 per share. Total proceeds received from this sale were $15.0 million.
On August 12, 2010, we effected a one-for-ten reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock. As a result of the reverse stock split, every ten shares of our common stock were converted into one share of our common stock. Any fractional shares received as a result of the reverse stock split were redeemed for cash. The total cash payment in lieu of shares was $230. Immediately after the reverse stock split, we had 2,680,842 shares of our common stock outstanding.
On November 12, 2010, we declared a dividend of $4.40 per share payable on December 29, 2010. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $1.2 million or $0.44 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.2 million in cash and 596,235 shares of common stock.
On November 15, 2011, we declared a dividend of $3.00 per share payable on December 30, 2011. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $2.0 million or $0.60 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $2.0 million in cash and 599,584 shares of common stock.
F-92
On November 9, 2012, the Company declared a dividend of $4.25 per share payable on December 31, 2012. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $3.3 million or $0.85 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $3.3 million in cash and 853,455 shares of common stock.
On October 30, 2013, the Company declared a dividend of $2.65 per share payable on December 27, 2013. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $2.5 million or $0.53 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $2.5 million in cash and 649,500 shares of common stock.
On September 24, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.18 per share payable on November 28, 2014. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock pursuant to the Companys DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.6 million in cash and 22,283 newly issued shares of common stock.
On September 24, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.22 per share payable on February 27, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.8 million in cash and 26,858 newly issued shares of common stock.
On September 24, 2014, the Company announced the approval of an open market share repurchase plan that allowed it to repurchase up to 200,000 shares of its common stock at prices below its NAV as reported in its then most recently published consolidated financial statements. As of February 29, 2016, the Company purchased 25,417 shares of common stock, at the average price of $14.03, for approximately $0.4 million pursuant to this repurchase plan. On October 7, 2015, the Companys board of directors extended the open market share repurchase plan for another year and increased the number of shares the Company is permitted to repurchase at prices below its NAV, as reported in its then most recently published consolidated financial statements, to 400,000 shares of its common stock.
On April 9, 2015, the Company declared a dividend of $0.27 per share payable on May 29, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.9 million in cash and 33,766 newly issued shares of common stock.
On May 14, 2015, the Company declared a special dividend of $1.00 per share payable on June 5, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $3.4 million in cash and 126,230 newly issued shares of common stock.
On July 8, 2015, the Company declared a dividend of $0.33 per share payable on August 31, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.1 million in cash and 47,861 newly issued shares of common stock.
On October 7, 2015, the Company declared a dividend of $0.36 per share payable on November 30, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.1 million in cash and 61,029 newly issued shares of common stock.
F-93
On January 12, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.40 per share payable on February 29, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.4 million in cash and 66,764 newly issued shares of common stock.
Note 11. Earnings Per Share
In accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 260, Earnings per Share (ASC 260), basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive common shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis.
The following information sets forth the computation of the weighted average basic and diluted net increase in net assets per share from operations for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 (dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts):
Basic and diluted |
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
February 28, 2014 |
|||||||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
$ | 11,645 | $ | 11,007 | $ | 8,497 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
5,582,453 | 5,385,049 | 4,920,517 | |||||||||
Weighted average earnings per common share-basic and diluted |
$ | 2.09 | $ | 2.04 | $ | 1.73 |
Note 12. Dividend
On January 12, 2016, the Companys board of directors declared a dividend of $0.40 per share payable on February 29, 2016, to all stockholders of record on February 1, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant the Companys DRIP.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.4 million in cash and 66,764 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.2% of the Companys outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $13.11 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on February 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 29, 2016.
On October 7, 2015, the Companys board of directors declared a dividend of $0.36 per share payable on November 30, 2015, to common stockholders of record on November 2, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant the Companys DRIP.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.1 million in cash and 61,029 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.1% of the Companys outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $14.53 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on November 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 27 and 30, 2015.
On July 8, 2015, the Companys board of directors declared a dividend of $0.33 per share payable on August 31, 2015, to common stockholders of record on August 3, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant the Companys DRIP.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.1 million in cash and 47,861 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.9% of the Companys outstanding common stock prior to the
F-94
dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.28 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on August 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 31, 2015.
On May 14, 2015, the Companys board of directors declared a special dividend of $1.00 per share payable on June 5, 2015, to common stockholders of record on May 26, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant the Companys DRIP.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $3.4 million in cash and 126,230 newly issued shares of common stock, or 2.3% of the Companys outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $16.47 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on May 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 and June 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, 2015.
On April 9, 2015, the Companys board of directors declared a dividend of $0.27 per share payable on May 29, 2015, to common stockholders of record on May 4, 2015. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant the Companys DRIP.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.9 million in cash and 33,766 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.6% of the Companys outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $16.78 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on May 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28 and 29, 2015.
On September 24, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.22 per share payable on February 27, 2015. Shareholders have the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock pursuant to the Companys DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.8 million in cash and 26,858 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.5% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $14.97 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on February 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27, 2015.
On September 24, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of $0.18 per share payable on November 28, 2014. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock pursuant to the Companys DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $0.6 million in cash and 22,283 newly issued shares of common stock, or 0.4% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $14.37 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on November 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26 and 28, 2014.
On October 30, 2013, the Company declared a dividend of $2.65 per share payable on December 27, 2013. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $2.5 million or $0.53 per share. This dividend was declared in reliance on certain private letter rulings issued by the IRS concluding that a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC subject to a limitation on the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders, which limitation must be at least 20.0% of the aggregate declared distribution.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $2.5 million in cash and 649,500 shares of common stock, or 13.7% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number
F-95
of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.439 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 11, 13, and 16, 2013.
On November 9, 2012, the Company declared a dividend of $4.25 per share payable on December 31, 2012. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $3.3 million or $0.85 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $3.3 million in cash and 853,455 shares of common stock, or 22.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 20.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.444 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 14, 17, and 19, 2012.
On November 15, 2011, the Company declared a dividend of $3.00 per share payable on December 30, 2011. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $2.0 million or $0.60 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $2.0 million in cash and 599,584 shares of common stock, or 18.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 20.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $13.1171 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 20, 21 and 22, 2011.
On November 12, 2010, the Company declared a dividend of $4.40 per share payable on December 23, 2010. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to approximately $1.2 million or $0.44 per share.
Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.2 million in cash and 596,235 shares of common stock, or 22.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The amount of cash elected to be received was greater than the cash limit of 10.0% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to shareholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $17.8049 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 20, 21 and 22, 2010. The consolidated financial statements for the period ended November 30, 2010 have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the increase in common stock as a result of the dividend in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-20-S50 regarding disclosure of a capital structure change after the interim balance sheet but before the release of the financial statements.
F-96
The following tables summarize dividends declared during the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015, February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012 (dollars in thousands except per share amounts):
Date Declared |
Record Date |
Payment Date |
Amount Per Share* |
Total Amount |
||||||||
January 12, 2016 |
February 1, 2016 | February 29, 2016 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 2,278 | ||||||
October 7, 2015 |
November 2, 2015 | November 30, 2015 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 2,028 | ||||||
July 8, 2015 |
August 3, 2015 | August 31, 2015 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 1,844 | ||||||
May 14, 2015 |
May 26, 2015 | June 5, 2015 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 5,429 | ||||||
April 9, 2015 |
May 4, 2015 | May 29, 2015 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 1,466 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total dividends declared |
$ | 2.36 | $ | 13,045 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Date Declared |
Record Date |
Payment Date |
Amount Per Share* |
Total Amount |
||||||||
September 24, 2014 |
October 30, 2014 | November 28, 2014 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 968 | ||||||
September 24, 2014 |
January 29, 2015 | February 27, 2015 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1,189 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total dividends declared |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 2,157 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Date Declared |
Record Date |
Payment Date |
Amount Per Share* |
Total Amount |
||||||||
October 30, 2013 |
November 13, 2013 | December 27, 2013 | $ | 2.65 | $ | 12,535 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total dividends declared |
$ | 2.65 | $ | 12,535 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Date Declared |
Record Date |
Payment Date |
Amount Per Share* |
Total Amount |
||||||||
November 9, 2012 |
November 20, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | $ | 4.25 | $ | 16,476 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total dividends declared |
$ | 4.25 | $ | 16,476 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Date Declared |
Record Date |
Payment Date |
Amount Per Share* |
Total Amount |
||||||||
November 15, 2011 |
November 25, 2011 | December 30, 2011 | $ | 3.00 | $ | 9,831 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total dividends declared |
$ | 3.00 | $ | 9,831 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Amount per share is calculated based on the number of shares outstanding at the date of declaration. |
F-97
Note 13. Financial Highlights
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015, February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012:
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
February 28, 2014 |
February 28, 2013 |
February 29, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Per share data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value at beginning of period |
$ | 22.70 | $ | 21.08 | $ | 22.71 | $ | 24.94 | $ | 26.20 | ||||||||||
Net investment income(1) |
1.91 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.57 | 1.52 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments and derivatives |
0.18 | 0.24 | (0.07 | ) | 1.85 | 2.21 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
2.09 | 2.04 | 1.73 | 3.42 | 3.73 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions declared from net investment income |
(2.36 | ) | (0.40 | ) | (2.65 | ) | (4.25 | ) | (3.00 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total distributions to stockholders |
(2.36 | ) | (0.40 | ) | (2.65 | ) | (4.25 | ) | (3.00 | ) | ||||||||||
Dilution(4) |
(0.37 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.71 | ) | (1.40 | ) | (1.99 | ) | ||||||||||
Net asset value at end of period |
$ | 22.06 | $ | 22.70 | $ | 21. 08 | $ | 22.71 | $ | 24.94 | ||||||||||
Net assets at end of period |
$ | 125,149,875 | $ | 122,598,742 | $ | 113,427,929 | $ | 107,437,874 | $ | 96,689,122 | ||||||||||
Shares outstanding at end of period |
5,672,227 | 5,401,899 | 5,379,616 | 4,730,116 | 3,876,661 | |||||||||||||||
Per share market value at end of period |
$ | 14.22 | $ | 15.76 | $ | 15.85 | $ | 17.02 | $ | 15.88 | ||||||||||
Total return based on market value(2) |
4.27 | % | 1.63 | % | 9.11 | % | 36.67 | % | 12.82 | % | ||||||||||
Total return based on net asset |
11.10 | % | 10.09 | % | 8.75 | % | 16.12 | % | 16.98 | % | ||||||||||
Ratio/Supplemental data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average, net assets |
8.52 | % | 8.11 | % | 7.97 | % | 6.26 | % | 5.64 | % | ||||||||||
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets |
6.93 | % | 6.52 | % | 6.28 | % | 5.22 | % | 5.66 | % | ||||||||||
Ratio of incentive management fees to average net assets |
1.78 | % | 2.14 | % | 0.84 | % | 2.52 | % | 1.85 | % | ||||||||||
Ratio of credit facility related expenses to average net assets |
6.75 | % | 6.19 | % | 5.46 | % | 2.46 | % | 1.40 | % | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets |
15.46 | % | 14.85 | % | 12.59 | % | 10.19 | % | 8.91 | % | ||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate(5) |
26.22 | % | 31.28 | % | 37.82 | % | 17.30 | % | 36.34 | % |
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, we identified errors that impacted the years ended February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012. The corrections for the errors, which we have concluded are immaterial to all prior period consolidated financial statements, are reflected in the consolidated financial statements and selected financial data included in this Form 10-K.
(1) | Net investment income per share is calculated using the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. |
F-98
(2) | Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common shares at the current market value on the first day and a sale at the current market value on the last day of the periods reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Companys dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions. Total investment returns covering less than a full period are not annualized. |
(3) | Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common shares at the current net asset value on the first day and a sale at the current net asset value on the last day of the periods reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Companys dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions. |
(4) | Represents the dilutive effect of issuing common stock below net asset value per share during the period in connection with the satisfaction of the Companys annual RIC distribution requirement. See Note 12, Dividend. |
(5) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated using the lesser of year-to-date sales or year-to-date purchases over the average of the invested assets at fair value. |
Note 14. Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
2016 | ||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands, except per share numbers) |
Qtr 4 | Qtr 3 | Qtr 2 | Qtr 1 | ||||||||||||
Interest and related portfolio income |
$ | 7,795 | $ | 6,936 | $ | 7,758 | $ | 7,561 | ||||||||
Net investment income |
3,100 | 2,150 | 3,657 | 1,771 | ||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(3,503 | ) | 1,271 | (2,415 | ) | 5,614 | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
(404 | ) | 3,421 | 1,243 | 7,385 | |||||||||||
Net investment income per common share at end of each quarter |
$ | 0.54 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.33 | ||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) per common share at end of each quarter |
$ | (0.62 | ) | $ | 0.23 | $ | (0.43 | ) | $ | 1.03 | ||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 1.27 | ||||||||
Net asset value per common share |
$ | 22.06 | $ | 22.59 | $ | 22.42 | $ | 22.75 |
2015 | ||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands, except per share numbers) |
Qtr 4 | Qtr 3 | Qtr 2 | Qtr 1 | ||||||||||||
Interest and related portfolio income |
$ | 7,451 | $ | 7,305 | $ | 6,475 | $ | 6,144 | ||||||||
Net investment income |
2,889 | 2,629 | 2,093 | 2,063 | ||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(184 | ) | 756 | 1,064 | (303 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
2,705 | 3,385 | 3,157 | 1,760 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income per common share at end of each quarter |
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) per common share at end of each quarter |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.20 | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.18 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Net asset value per common share |
$ | 22.70 | $ | 22.45 | $ | 22.00 | $ | 21.41 |
2014 | ||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands, except per share numbers) |
Qtr 4 | Qtr 3 | Qtr 2 | Qtr 1 | ||||||||||||
Interest and related portfolio income |
$ | 5,687 | $ | 5,801 | $ | 5,388 | $ | 6,018 | ||||||||
Net investment income |
1,525 | 2,407 | 2,629 | 2,313 | ||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
2,236 | (1,630 | ) | (2,313 | ) | 1,330 | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
3,761 | 777 | 316 | 3,644 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income per common share at end of each quarter |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.49 | ||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) per common share at end of each quarter |
$ | 0.42 | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | (0.49 | ) | $ | 0.28 | ||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | | $ | 2.65 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Net asset value per common share |
$ | 21.08 | $ | 20.39 | $ | 23.55 | $ | 23.48 |
F-99
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, we identified errors that impacted the years ended February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013, and February 29, 2012. The corrections for the errors, which we have concluded are immaterial to all prior period consolidated financial statements, are reflected in the consolidated financial statements and selected financial data included in this Form 10-K.
Note 15. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the filing of this Form 10-K and determined that there have been no events that have occurred that would require adjustments to the Companys disclosures in the consolidated financial statements except for the following:
On March 31, 2016, the Company declared a dividend of $0.41 per share payable on April 27, 2016, to common stockholders of record on April 15, 2016. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, or receive shares of common stock, pursuant our DRIP. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of approximately $1.5 million in cash and 56,728 newly issued shares of common stock, or 1.0% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of $15.43 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on April 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26 and 27, 2016.
On February 28, 2017, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.46 per share, payable on March 28, 2017, to common stockholders of record as of March 15, 2017.
F-100
INDEX TO OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.
S-2 | ||||
Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 |
S-3 | |||
S-4 | ||||
Schedules of Investments as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 |
S-5 | |||
S-21 | ||||
S-22 | ||||
S-23 |
IMPORTANT NOTE
In accordance with certain SEC rules, Saratoga Investment Corp. (the Company) is providing additional information regarding one of its portfolio companies, Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (Saratoga CLO). The Company owns 100% of the subordinated notes of the Saratoga CLO. The additional financial information regarding the Saratoga CLO does not directly impact the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
S-1
Report of Independent Auditors
The Collateral Manager and Directors,
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd., which comprise the statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, and the statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, and the related notes to the financial statements.
Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entitys preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entitys internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. at February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, and the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young
New York, New York
May 17, 2016
S-2
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
As of | ||||||||
February 29, 2016 | February 28, 2015 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments |
||||||||
Fair Value Loans (amortized cost of $300,112,538 and $295,193,588, respectively) |
$ | 284,652,926 | $ | 294,621,817 | ||||
Fair Value Other/Structured finance securities (amortized cost of $3,531,218 and $2,566,752, respectively) |
191,863 | 617,451 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total investments at fair value (amortized cost of $303,643,756 and $297,760,340, respectively) |
284,844,789 | 295,239,268 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
2,349,633 | 5,831,797 | ||||||
Receivable from open trades |
2,691,831 | 2,119,687 | ||||||
Interest receivable |
1,698,562 | 1,290,637 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 291,584,815 | $ | 304,481,389 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Interest payable |
$ | 626,040 | $ | 631,886 | ||||
Payable from open trades |
7,123,854 | 5,214,331 | ||||||
Accrued base management fee |
85,008 | 85,957 | ||||||
Accrued subordinated management fee |
85,008 | 85,957 | ||||||
Class A-1 NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
170,000,000 | 170,000,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class A-1 NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
(1,319,258 | ) | (1,495,802 | ) | ||||
Class A-2 NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
20,000,000 | 20,000,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class A-2 NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
(136,750 | ) | (155,050 | ) | ||||
Class B NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
44,800,000 | 44,800,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class B NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
(888,328 | ) | (1,007,205 | ) | ||||
Class C NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
16,000,000 | 16,000,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class C NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
(553,078 | ) | (627,091 | ) | ||||
Class D NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
14,000,000 | 14,000,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class D NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
(717,938 | ) | (814,013 | ) | ||||
Class E NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
13,100,000 | 13,100,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class E NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
(1,353,521 | ) | (1,534,650 | ) | ||||
Class F NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | ||||||
Discount on Class F NotesSIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. |
(492,300 | ) | (558,180 | ) | ||||
Deferred debt financing costs, SIC CLO 2013-1, Ltd. Notes |
(1,716,554 | ) | (1,941,595 | ) | ||||
Subordinated Notes |
30,000,000 | 30,000,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 313,142,183 | $ | 310,284,545 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 6) |
||||||||
NET ASSETS |
||||||||
Ordinary equity, par value $1.00, 250 ordinary shares authorized, 250 and 250 issued and outstanding, respectively |
$ | 250 | $ | 250 | ||||
Accumulated loss |
(5,803,406 | ) | (3,343,488 | ) | ||||
Net loss |
(15,754,212 | ) | (2,459,918 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total net assets |
(21,557,368 | ) | (5,803,156 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and net assets |
$ | 291,584,815 | $ | 304,481,389 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
S-3
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.
For the year ended February 29, 2016 |
For the year ended February 28, 2015 |
For the year ended February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
||||||||||||
Interest from investments |
$ | 14,372,377 | $ | 13,091,019 | $ | 15,486,413 | ||||||
Interest from cash and cash equivalents |
1,213 | 1,446 | 6,792 | |||||||||
Other income |
316,187 | 188,180 | 945,441 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total investment income |
14,689,777 | 13,280,645 | 16,438,646 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
EXPENSES |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
11,696,757 | 9,635,136 | 11,678,514 | |||||||||
Professional fees |
292,754 | 219,293 | 433,073 | |||||||||
Miscellaneous fee expense |
23,742 | 34,303 | 175,283 | |||||||||
Base management fee |
747,390 | 760,102 | 517,563 | |||||||||
Subordinated management fee |
747,390 | 760,102 | 1,257,578 | |||||||||
Trustee expenses |
121,299 | 123,999 | 83,221 | |||||||||
Amortization expense |
955,858 | 953,862 | 994,602 | |||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | 3,442,442 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total expenses |
14,585,190 | 12,486,797 | 18,582,276 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS) |
104,587 | 793,848 | (2,143,630 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS: |
||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
419,096 | 620,817 | (8,815,296 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(16,277,895 | ) | (3,874,583 | ) | 6,776,871 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net loss on investments |
(15,858,799 | ) | (3,253,766 | ) | (2,038,425 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | (15,754,212 | ) | $ | (2,459,918 | ) | $ | (4,182,055 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
S-4
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1 Ltd.
February 29, 2016
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
A-1 Preferred Shares | Equity | 0.00 | % | 6,692 | $ | 669,214 | $ | 1,673 | ||||||||||||||||
Education Management II LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
A-2 Preferred Shares | Equity | 0.00 | % | 18,975 | 1,897,538 | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||
New Millennium Holdco, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Common Stock | Equity | 0.00 | % | 14,813 | 964,466 | 190,095 | ||||||||||||||||||
24 Hour Holdings III LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 5/28/2021 | $ | 492,500 | 488,586 | 455,154 | ||||||||||||||||
Acosta Holdco Inc. |
Media | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 4.25 | % | 9/26/2021 | $ | 1,972,936 | 1,959,834 | 1,855,389 | ||||||||||||||||
Aspen Dental Management, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan Initial | Loan | 5.50 | % | 4/29/2022 | $ | 497,500 | 495,228 | 495,221 | ||||||||||||||||
Advantage Sales & Marketing Inc. |
Services: Business | Delayed Draw Term Loan |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 7/25/2021 | $ | 2,471,231 | 2,468,039 | 2,342,826 | ||||||||||||||||
AgroFresh |
Food Services | Term Loan | Loan | 5.75 | % | 7/30/2021 | $ | 1,990,000 | 1,980,704 | 1,935,275 | ||||||||||||||||
Aegis Toxicology Science Corporation |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term B Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 2/24/2021 | $ | 985,000 | 985,000 | 797,850 | ||||||||||||||||
Akorn, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 4/16/2021 | $ | 398,056 | 396,681 | 396,066 | ||||||||||||||||
Albertsons LLC |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan B-4 | Loan | 5.50 | % | 8/25/2021 | $ | 3,384,425 | 3,367,410 | 3,302,623 | ||||||||||||||||
Alere Inc. (fka IM US Holdings, LLC) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 6/20/2022 | $ | 927,265 | 925,091 | 925,365 | ||||||||||||||||
Alion Science T/L B (1st Lien) |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.50 | % | 8/19/2021 | $ | 2,985,000 | 2,971,074 | 2,824,555 | ||||||||||||||||
Alliance HealthCare |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 6/3/2019 | $ | 994,856 | 990,161 | 906,981 | ||||||||||||||||
Alliant Holdings T/L B (1st Lien) |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate |
Term Loan B (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 8/12/2022 | $ | 995,000 | 992,679 | 960,921 | ||||||||||||||||
Alvogen Pharma US, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 6.00 | % | 4/4/2022 | $ | 480,447 | 478,240 | 456,425 | ||||||||||||||||
American Beacon Advisors, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.50 | % | 4/30/2022 | $ | 248,749 | 247,612 | 244,190 | ||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | LC-2 Facility | Loan | 0.29 | % | 7/26/2016 | $ | 9,447 | 9,445 | 9,305 | ||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | LC-3 Facility | Loan | 0.29 | % | 7/26/2016 | $ | 5,244 | 5,244 | 5,166 | ||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | U.S. Term F Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 2/24/2021 | $ | 3,150,423 | 3,150,423 | 3,126,133 | ||||||||||||||||
Asurion, LLC (fka Asurion Corporation) |
Insurance | Incremental Tranche B-1 Term Loan |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 5/24/2019 | $ | 2,596,480 | 2,573,245 | 2,441,237 | ||||||||||||||||
Asurion, LLC (fka Asurion Corporation) |
Insurance | Term Loan B4 (First Lein) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 8/4/2022 | $ | 2,478,125 | 2,466,303 | 2,270,582 | ||||||||||||||||
Auction.com |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate |
Term Loan | Loan | 6.00 | % | 5/13/2019 | $ | 2,522,992 | 2,522,722 | 2,491,455 | ||||||||||||||||
Avantor Performance Materials Holdings, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 6/24/2017 | $ | 2,156,953 | 2,153,896 | 2,135,384 | ||||||||||||||||
Bass Pro Group, LLC |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 6/5/2020 | $ | 1,488,750 | 1,485,895 | 1,397,564 | ||||||||||||||||
Belmond Interfin Ltd. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 3/19/2021 | $ | 491,249 | 489,361 | 477,127 | ||||||||||||||||
Berry Plastics Corporation |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term E Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1/6/2021 | $ | 1,314,499 | 1,305,069 | 1,291,903 | ||||||||||||||||
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. |
Food/Drug Retailers |
New 2013 (November) Replacement Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 9/26/2019 | $ | 1,476,196 | 1,475,409 | 1,401,161 |
S-5
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Blue Coat Systems |
Technology | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 5/20/2022 | $ | 997,500 | 995,159 | 945,131 | ||||||||||||||||
BMC Software |
Technology | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 9/10/2020 | $ | 1,979,798 | 1,926,080 | 1,571,821 | ||||||||||||||||
Brickman Group Holdings, Inc. |
Brokers/Dealers/ Investment Houses |
Initial Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 12/18/2020 | $ | 1,476,212 | 1,464,327 | 1,426,390 | ||||||||||||||||
Brock Holdings III, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 3/16/2017 | $ | 1,917,168 | 1,924,101 | 1,802,138 | ||||||||||||||||
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term B-2 Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 8/13/2021 | $ | 1,861,667 | 1,853,426 | 1,845,843 | ||||||||||||||||
BWAY Holding Company |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 8/14/2020 | $ | 985,000 | 976,335 | 930,826 | ||||||||||||||||
Caesars Entertainment Corp. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term B-7 Loan | Loan | 13.25 | % | 3/1/2017 | $ | 995,000 | 991,037 | 814,656 | ||||||||||||||||
Camp International Holding Company |
Aerospace and Defense |
2013 Replacement Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 5/31/2019 | $ | 1,940,113 | 1,940,984 | 1,806,730 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital Automotive L.P. |
Conglomerate | Tranche B-1 Term Loan Facility |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 4/10/2019 | $ | 2,051,828 | 2,055,060 | 2,044,564 | ||||||||||||||||
Catalent Pharma Solutions, Inc |
Drugs | Initial Term B Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 5/20/2021 | $ | 492,501 | 490,549 | 487,271 | ||||||||||||||||
Cengage Learning Acquisitions, Inc. |
Publishing | Term Loan | Loan | 7.00 | % | 3/31/2020 | $ | 2,647,871 | 2,670,807 | 2,539,758 | ||||||||||||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC |
Cable and Satellite Television |
Term F Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 12/31/2020 | $ | 2,628,783 | 2,621,343 | 2,566,823 | ||||||||||||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term G Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 12/31/2019 | $ | 1,022,569 | 994,876 | 974,212 | ||||||||||||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term H Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1/27/2021 | $ | 1,881,500 | 1,828,566 | 1,785,920 | ||||||||||||||||
Cinedigm Digital Funding I, LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 2/28/2018 | $ | 298,828 | 297,362 | 295,840 | ||||||||||||||||
CITGO Petroleum Corporation |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 7/29/2021 | $ | 1,984,975 | 1,962,423 | 1,865,876 | ||||||||||||||||
Communications Sales & Leasing, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 10/24/2022 | $ | 1,990,000 | 1,978,594 | 1,847,596 | ||||||||||||||||
CommScope, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.75 | % | 12/29/2022 | $ | 498,750 | 497,568 | 494,176 | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Aerospace Manufacturing, LLC |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 8/11/2022 | $ | 1,437,500 | 1,430,556 | 1,329,688 | ||||||||||||||||
Concordia Healthcare Corp |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 5.25 | % | 10/21/2021 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,894,483 | 1,920,000 | ||||||||||||||||
CPI Acquisition Inc. |
Technology | Term Loan B (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.50 | % | 8/17/2022 | $ | 1,436,782 | 1,415,977 | 1,396,667 | ||||||||||||||||
CPI International Acquisition, Inc. (f/k/a Catalyst Holdings, Inc.) |
Electronics/Electric | Term B Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 11/17/2017 | $ | 1,564,182 | 1,564,182 | 1,501,615 | ||||||||||||||||
Crosby US Acquisition Corp. |
Industrial Equipment | Initial Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 11/23/2020 | $ | 735,000 | 734,245 | 536,550 | ||||||||||||||||
CT Technologies Intermediate Hldgs, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 12/1/2021 | $ | 1,485,038 | 1,471,665 | 1,433,061 | ||||||||||||||||
Culligan International Company |
Conglomerate | Dollar Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.25 | % | 12/19/2017 | $ | 771,625 | 742,910 | 721,469 | ||||||||||||||||
Culligan International Company |
Conglomerate | Dollar Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 9.50 | % | 6/19/2018 | $ | 783,162 | 754,065 | 734,214 | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulus Media Holdings Inc. |
Broadcast Radio and Television |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 12/23/2020 | $ | 470,093 | 466,690 | 304,973 | ||||||||||||||||
DAE Aviation (StandardAero) |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 7/7/2022 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,985,759 | 1,970,063 |
S-6
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
DCS Business Services, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries | Term B Loan | Loan | 8.75 | % | 3/19/2018 | $ | 2,409,739 | 2,397,948 | 2,409,739 | ||||||||||||||||
Dell International LLC |
Technology | Term Loan B2 | Loan | 4.00 | % | 4/29/2020 | $ | 2,904,989 | 2,892,348 | 2,889,854 | ||||||||||||||||
Delta 2 (Lux) S.a.r.l. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan B-3 | Loan | 4.75 | % | 7/30/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,870 | 925,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Deluxe Entertainment Service Group, Inc. |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.50 | % | 2/28/2020 | $ | 1,882,983 | 1,884,279 | 1,751,174 | ||||||||||||||||
Diamond Resorts International |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 5/7/2021 | $ | 926,971 | 923,222 | 897,614 | ||||||||||||||||
Diamond Resorts International |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan (Add-On) |
Loan | 5.50 | % | 5/7/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 980,687 | 968,330 | ||||||||||||||||
DJO Finance LLC |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 6/8/2020 | $ | 497,500 | 495,435 | 478,222 | ||||||||||||||||
DPX Holdings B.V. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan 2015 Incr Dollar |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 3/11/2021 | $ | 2,955,000 | 2,948,456 | 2,799,863 | ||||||||||||||||
Drew Marine Group Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 11/19/2020 | $ | 2,472,161 | 2,445,601 | 2,299,110 | ||||||||||||||||
DTZ U.S. Borrower LLC |
Construction & Building | Term Loan B Add-on |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 11/4/2021 | $ | 2,985,000 | 2,970,317 | 2,869,331 | ||||||||||||||||
Edelman Financial Group Inc. |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate |
Term Loan | Loan | 6.50 | % | 12/19/2022 | $ | 1,500,000 | 1,470,617 | 1,459,695 | ||||||||||||||||
Education Management LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan A | Loan | 5.50 | % | 7/2/2020 | $ | 501,970 | 485,313 | 160,630 | ||||||||||||||||
Education Management LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B (2.00% Cash/6.50% PIK) |
Loan | 8.50 | % | 7/2/2020 | $ | 893,447 | 867,647 | 56,582 | ||||||||||||||||
Emerald Performance Materials, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 8/1/2021 | $ | 484,659 | 482,690 | 473,148 | ||||||||||||||||
Emerald Performance Materials, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 7.75 | % | 8/1/2022 | $ | 500,000 | 497,844 | 468,750 | ||||||||||||||||
Emerald 2 Limited |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B1A | Loan | 5.00 | % | 5/14/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 991,762 | 866,670 | ||||||||||||||||
Endo International plc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 3.75 | % | 9/26/2022 | $ | 1,000,000 | 997,602 | 987,780 | ||||||||||||||||
EnergySolutions, LLC |
Environmental Industries |
Term Loan B | Loan | 6.75 | % | 5/29/2020 | $ | 937,857 | 923,660 | 731,528 | ||||||||||||||||
Evergreen Acqco 1 LP |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
New Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 7/9/2019 | $ | 965,081 | 963,406 | 719,951 | ||||||||||||||||
EWT Holdings III Corp. (fka WTG Holdings III Corp.) |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 1/15/2021 | $ | 1,967,406 | 1,962,950 | 1,908,383 | ||||||||||||||||
Federal-Mogul Corporation |
Automotive | Tranche C Term Loan |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 4/15/2021 | $ | 2,955,000 | 2,943,580 | 2,345,530 | ||||||||||||||||
First Data Corporation |
Financial Intermediaries | First Data Corp T/L (2018 New Dollar) |
Loan | 3.93 | % | 3/23/2018 | $ | 2,790,451 | 2,748,229 | 2,752,780 | ||||||||||||||||
First Data Corporation |
Financial Intermediaries | First Data T/L Ext (2021) |
Loan | 4.43 | % | 3/24/2021 | $ | 2,111,028 | 2,034,284 | 2,077,779 | ||||||||||||||||
First Eagle Investment Management |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 12/1/2022 | $ | 1,500,000 | 1,470,946 | 1,412,504 | ||||||||||||||||
Fitness International, LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 7/1/2020 | $ | 1,976,234 | 1,945,935 | 1,850,249 | ||||||||||||||||
FMG Resources (August 2006) Pty LTD (FMG America Finance, Inc.) |
Nonferrous Metals/ Minerals |
Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 6/28/2019 | $ | 1,962,387 | 1,962,515 | 1,504,738 | ||||||||||||||||
Garda World Security Corporation |
Services: Business | Term B Delayed Draw Loan |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 11/6/2020 | $ | 199,120 | 198,391 | 187,344 | ||||||||||||||||
Garda World Security Corporation |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 11/6/2020 | $ | 778,380 | 775,586 | 732,346 | ||||||||||||||||
Gardner Denver, Inc. |
High Tech Industries | Initial Dollar Term Loan |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 7/30/2020 | $ | 2,451,137 | 2,445,005 | 2,016,452 |
S-7
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Gates Global LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 7/5/2021 | $ | 493,750 | 488,813 | 433,883 | ||||||||||||||||
Generac Power Systems, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.50 | % | 5/31/2020 | $ | 693,858 | 684,537 | 676,511 | ||||||||||||||||
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Amended Tranche B Term Loan |
Loan | 3.25 | % | 3/4/2019 | $ | 4,131,271 | 4,121,165 | 4,012,497 | ||||||||||||||||
Global Tel*Link Corporation |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 5/26/2020 | $ | 2,725,318 | 2,717,647 | 2,237,023 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The |
Chemicals/Plastics | Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 3.75 | % | 4/30/2019 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,974,077 | 2,005,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Grosvenor Capital Management Holdings, LP |
Brokers/Dealers/ Investment Houses |
Initial Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1/4/2021 | $ | 1,264,036 | 1,259,418 | 1,191,354 | ||||||||||||||||
GTCR Valor Companies, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 6/1/2021 | $ | 1,974,982 | 1,941,456 | 1,959,340 | ||||||||||||||||
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (fka Clarke American Corp.) |
Publishing | Tranche B-4 Term Loan |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 8/2/2019 | $ | 475,000 | 473,378 | 421,561 | ||||||||||||||||
HCA Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Tranche B-4 Term Loan |
Loan | 3.36 | % | 5/1/2018 | $ | 2,119,664 | 2,053,127 | 2,116,294 | ||||||||||||||||
Headwaters Incorporated |
Building & Development |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 3/24/2022 | $ | 248,750 | 247,628 | 248,285 | ||||||||||||||||
Hercules Achievement Holdings, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 12/10/2021 | $ | 249,370 | 246,940 | 244,929 | ||||||||||||||||
Hertz Corporation, The |
Automotive | Tranche B-1 Term Loan |
Loan | 3.75 | % | 3/12/2018 | $ | 2,910,000 | 2,933,230 | 2,879,998 | ||||||||||||||||
Hoffmaster Group, Inc. |
Containers/Glass Products |
Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 5/8/2020 | $ | 1,970,000 | 1,955,325 | 1,915,825 | ||||||||||||||||
Hostess Brand, LLC |
Beverage, Food & Tobacco |
Term Loan B (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 8/3/2022 | $ | 997,500 | 995,241 | 983,784 | ||||||||||||||||
Huntsman International LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B (First Lien) |
Loan | 3.52 | % | 4/19/2019 | $ | 3,840,541 | 3,814,577 | 3,727,245 | ||||||||||||||||
Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 6/30/2021 | $ | 491,196 | 489,277 | 465,757 | ||||||||||||||||
Infor (US), Inc. (fka Lawson Software Inc.) |
Services: Business | Tranche B-5 Term Loan |
Loan | 3.75 | % | 6/3/2020 | $ | 2,188,296 | 2,174,333 | 2,015,049 | ||||||||||||||||
Insight Global |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 6.00 | % | 10/29/2021 | $ | 1,979,592 | 1,971,967 | 1,961,439 | ||||||||||||||||
Informatica Corporation |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 8/5/2022 | $ | 498,750 | 497,554 | 468,411 | ||||||||||||||||
J. Crew Group, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term B-1 Loan Retired 03/05/2014 |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 3/5/2021 | $ | 955,481 | 955,481 | 639,379 | ||||||||||||||||
Jazz Acquisition, Inc |
Aerospace and Defense | First Lien 6/14 | Loan | 4.50 | % | 6/19/2021 | $ | 492,727 | 491,745 | 434,832 | ||||||||||||||||
J.Jill Group, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 5/9/2022 | $ | 995,000 | 990,362 | 925,350 | ||||||||||||||||
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Dollar Term D-1 Loan |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 5/4/2018 | $ | 2,452,586 | 2,436,004 | 2,392,645 | ||||||||||||||||
Koosharem, LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 7.50 | % | 5/15/2020 | $ | 2,965,050 | 2,942,458 | 2,683,370 | ||||||||||||||||
Kraton Polymers, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Initial) | Loan | 6.00 | % | 1/6/2022 | $ | 2,500,000 | 2,252,500 | 2,250,000 | ||||||||||||||||
LPL Holdings |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate |
Term Loan B (2022) | Loan | 4.75 | % | 11/21/2022 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,980,543 | 1,900,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Mauser Holdings, Inc. |
Containers/Glass Products |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 7/31/2021 | $ | 493,750 | 491,750 | 475,234 | ||||||||||||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term B Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1/28/2020 | $ | 486,250 | 486,250 | 479,792 | ||||||||||||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan B-2 | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1/28/2020 | $ | 1,212,794 | 1,208,220 | 1,201,042 | ||||||||||||||||
Micro Holding Corp. |
High Tech Industries | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 7/8/2021 | $ | 992,447 | 987,851 | 950,268 | ||||||||||||||||
Microsemi Corporation |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.25 | % | 1/15/2023 | $ | 2,183,824 | 2,119,162 | 2,180,177 |
S-8
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Midas Intermediate Holdco II, LLC |
Automotive | Term Loan (Initial) | Loan | 4.50 | % | 8/18/2021 | $ | 246,875 | 245,802 | 244,098 | ||||||||||||||||
MPH Acquisition Holdings LLC |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 3/31/2021 | $ | 376,136 | 375,400 | 366,500 | ||||||||||||||||
MSC Software Corp. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 5/29/2020 | $ | 985,000 | 977,601 | 886,500 | ||||||||||||||||
National Veterinary Associates, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.75 | % | 8/14/2021 | $ | 987,526 | 984,296 | 959,549 | ||||||||||||||||
National Vision, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 6.75 | % | 3/11/2022 | $ | 250,000 | 249,729 | 218,750 | ||||||||||||||||
Neptune Finco (CSC Holdings) |
Cable and Satellite Television |
Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 10/7/2022 | $ | 1,000,000 | 985,784 | 989,750 | ||||||||||||||||
New Millennium Holdco |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 7.50 | % | 12/21/2020 | $ | 2,007,042 | 1,811,375 | 1,822,655 | ||||||||||||||||
Nortek, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.50 | % | 10/30/2020 | $ | 985,022 | 974,747 | 939,464 | ||||||||||||||||
NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc. |
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.63 | % | 1/30/2023 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,930,000 | 1,950,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Novelis, Inc. |
Conglomerate | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 6/2/2022 | $ | 4,771,058 | 4,749,389 | 4,440,090 | ||||||||||||||||
Novetta Solutions |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan (200MM) |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 10/16/2022 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,980,636 | 1,940,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Novetta Solutions |
Aerospace and Defense | Term Loan (2nd Lien) |
Loan | 9.50 | % | 9/29/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,269 | 950,000 | ||||||||||||||||
NPC International, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 4.75 | % | 12/28/2018 | $ | 481,250 | 481,250 | 472,829 | ||||||||||||||||
NRG Energy, Inc. |
Utilities | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 2.75 | % | 7/2/2018 | $ | 3,821,925 | 3,808,282 | 3,751,449 | ||||||||||||||||
Numericable |
Broadcast Radio and Television |
Term Loan B-5 | Loan | 4.56 | % | 7/31/2022 | $ | 997,500 | 995,164 | 953,171 | ||||||||||||||||
NuSil Technology LLC. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 4/7/2017 | $ | 789,045 | 789,045 | 774,645 | ||||||||||||||||
Onex Carestream Finance LP |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan (First Lien 2013) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 6/7/2019 | $ | 3,832,558 | 3,821,232 | 3,244,912 | ||||||||||||||||
OnexYork Acquisition Co |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.75 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 493,749 | 490,644 | 459,435 | ||||||||||||||||
OpenLink International LLC |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 6.25 | % | 10/30/2017 | $ | 2,944,496 | 2,943,282 | 2,811,994 | ||||||||||||||||
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. (Wok Acquisition Corp.) |
Food/Drug Retailers | Term Borrowing | Loan | 4.25 | % | 6/24/2019 | $ | 1,432,750 | 1,427,110 | 1,336,039 | ||||||||||||||||
P2 Upstream Acquisition Co. (P2 Upstream Canada BC ULC) |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 10/30/2020 | $ | 980,000 | 976,133 | 774,200 | ||||||||||||||||
Penn Products Terminal, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.75 | % | 4/13/2022 | $ | 248,125 | 246,994 | 218,350 | ||||||||||||||||
PetCo Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan B-1 | Loan | 5.75 | % | 1/15/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 980,217 | 978,590 | ||||||||||||||||
PetCo Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan B-2 | Loan | 5.62 | % | 1/15/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 980,216 | 978,960 | ||||||||||||||||
Petsmart, Inc. (Argos Merger Sub, Inc.) |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan B1 | Loan | 4.25 | % | 3/11/2022 | $ | 992,500 | 987,862 | 961,176 | ||||||||||||||||
PGX Holdings, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries | Term Loan | Loan | 5.75 | % | 9/29/2020 | $ | 954,643 | 947,123 | 941,917 | ||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (Jaguar Holdings, LLC) |
Conglomerate | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 8/18/2022 | $ | 1,920,848 | 1,911,850 | 1,872,346 | ||||||||||||||||
Phillips-Medisize Corporation |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 6/16/2021 | $ | 492,500 | 490,535 | 458,025 | ||||||||||||||||
Physio-Control International, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 6/6/2022 | $ | 498,750 | 496,371 | 498,127 | ||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC |
Food Products | New Term Loan G | Loan | 3.00 | % | 4/29/2020 | $ | 2,581,332 | 2,577,286 | 2,553,737 |
S-9
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Planet Fitness Holdings LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 3/31/2021 | $ | 2,417,118 | 2,410,079 | 2,368,776 | ||||||||||||||||
PrePaid Legal Services, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.50 | % | 7/1/2019 | $ | 724,167 | 721,080 | 716,020 | ||||||||||||||||
Presidio, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 2/2/2022 | $ | 1,902,292 | 1,846,615 | 1,816,688 | ||||||||||||||||
Prime Security Services (Protection One) |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 7/1/2021 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,985,640 | 1,924,178 | ||||||||||||||||
Ranpak Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 938,354 | 936,008 | 886,745 | ||||||||||||||||
Ranpak Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 8.25 | % | 10/3/2022 | $ | 500,000 | 497,866 | 400,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Redtop Acquisitions Limited |
Electronics/Electric | Initial Dollar Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 12/3/2020 | $ | 490,000 | 487,461 | 482,444 | ||||||||||||||||
Regal Cinemas Corporation |
Services: Consumer | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 4/1/2022 | $ | 497,500 | 496,320 | 496,256 | ||||||||||||||||
Research Now Group, Inc |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 3/18/2021 | $ | 2,058,445 | 2,048,627 | 1,996,692 | ||||||||||||||||
Rexnord LLC/RBS Global, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment |
Term B Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 8/21/2020 | $ | 1,630,123 | 1,631,387 | 1,557,647 | ||||||||||||||||
Reynolds Group Holdings Inc. |
Industrial Equipment |
Incremental U.S. Term Loan |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 12/1/2018 | $ | 1,910,551 | 1,910,551 | 1,902,946 | ||||||||||||||||
Riverbed Technology, Inc. |
Technology | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 2/25/2022 | $ | 992,500 | 988,224 | 970,873 | ||||||||||||||||
Rocket Software, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.75 | % | 2/8/2018 | $ | 1,901,835 | 1,889,759 | 1,889,150 | ||||||||||||||||
Rovi Solutions Corporation / Rovi Guides, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Tranche B-3 Term Loan |
Loan | 3.75 | % | 7/2/2021 | $ | 1,477,500 | 1,471,640 | 1,422,094 | ||||||||||||||||
Royal Adhesives and Sealants |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 6/20/2022 | $ | 497,500 | 495,187 | 479,675 | ||||||||||||||||
Royal Adhesives and Sealants |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 8.50 | % | 6/19/2023 | $ | 500,000 | 496,388 | 478,335 | ||||||||||||||||
RPI Finance Trust |
Financial Intermediaries |
Term B-4 Term Loan |
Loan | 3.50 | % | 11/9/2020 | $ | 5,155,193 | 5,155,193 | 5,132,665 | ||||||||||||||||
Sable International Finance Ltd |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B1 | Loan | 5.50 | % | 12/2/2022 | $ | 825,000 | 808,500 | 800,770 | ||||||||||||||||
Sable International Finance Ltd |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B2 | Loan | 5.50 | % | 12/2/2022 | $ | 675,000 | 661,500 | 655,175 | ||||||||||||||||
SBP Holdings LP |
Industrial Equipment |
Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 3/27/2021 | $ | 982,500 | 978,645 | 707,400 | ||||||||||||||||
Scientific Games International, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan B2 | Loan | 6.00 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 990,000 | 981,872 | 904,613 | ||||||||||||||||
SCS Holdings (Sirius Computer) |
High Tech Industries |
Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 10/30/2022 | $ | 1,977,528 | 1,939,305 | 1,937,978 | ||||||||||||||||
Seadrill Operating LP |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 2/21/2021 | $ | 987,406 | 919,799 | 407,305 | ||||||||||||||||
Sensus USA Inc. (fka Sensus Metering Systems) |
Utilities | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 5/9/2017 | $ | 1,905,121 | 1,902,477 | 1,826,534 | ||||||||||||||||
ServiceMaster Company, The |
Conglomerate | Tranche B Term Loan |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 7/1/2021 | $ | 1,975,000 | 1,959,254 | 1,956,889 | ||||||||||||||||
Shearers Foods LLC |
Food Services | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.94 | % | 6/30/2021 | $ | 987,500 | 985,421 | 952,938 | ||||||||||||||||
Sitel Worldwide |
Telecommunications | Term Loan | Loan | 6.50 | % | 9/18/2021 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,976,131 | 1,931,160 | ||||||||||||||||
Sonneborn, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 12/10/2020 | $ | 222,750 | 222,282 | 220,801 | ||||||||||||||||
Sonneborn, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Initial US Term Loan |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 12/10/2020 | $ | 1,262,250 | 1,259,600 | 1,251,205 |
S-10
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Sophia, L.P. |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan (Closing Date) |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 9/30/2022 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,985,507 | 1,911,469 | ||||||||||||||||
SourceHOV LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan B (First Lien) |
Loan | 7.75 | % | 10/31/2019 | $ | 1,937,500 | 1,891,680 | 1,541,281 | ||||||||||||||||
SRAM, LLC |
Industrial Equipment |
Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 4/10/2020 | $ | 2,904,577 | 2,896,630 | 2,207,479 | ||||||||||||||||
Staples, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan 1/16 | Loan | 4.75 | % | 4/23/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,308 | 992,130 | ||||||||||||||||
Steak n Shake Operations, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 3/19/2021 | $ | 965,341 | 957,952 | 946,034 | ||||||||||||||||
SuperMedia Inc. (fka Idearc Inc.) |
Publishing | Loan | Loan | 11.60 | % | 12/30/2016 | $ | 222,900 | 220,105 | 67,520 | ||||||||||||||||
Survey Sampling International |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 12/16/2020 | $ | 992,500 | 990,554 | 970,169 | ||||||||||||||||
Sybil Finance BV |
High Tech Industries |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 3/20/2020 | $ | 1,272,143 | 1,270,803 | 1,253,061 | ||||||||||||||||
Syniverse Holdings, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Initial Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 4/23/2019 | $ | 479,913 | 476,927 | 311,944 | ||||||||||||||||
TaxACT, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 7.00 | % | 1/3/2023 | $ | 1,860,000 | 1,805,035 | 1,804,200 | ||||||||||||||||
TGI Fridays, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.25 | % | 7/15/2020 | $ | 1,651,816 | 1,647,936 | 1,636,669 | ||||||||||||||||
Townsquare Media, Inc. |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 4/1/2022 | $ | 932,522 | 928,333 | 915,624 | ||||||||||||||||
TPF II Power LLC and TPF II Covert Midco LLC |
Utilities | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 10/2/2021 | $ | 1,491,826 | 1,433,943 | 1,396,722 | ||||||||||||||||
TransDigm, Inc. |
Aerospace and Defense |
Tranche C Term Loan |
Loan | 3.75 | % | 2/28/2020 | $ | 4,277,294 | 4,283,815 | 4,148,975 | ||||||||||||||||
Travel Leaders Group, LLC |
Hotel, Gaming and Leisure |
Term Loan B | Loan | 7.00 | % | 12/7/2020 | $ | 1,946,300 | 1,939,729 | 1,917,107 | ||||||||||||||||
Tricorbraun, Inc. (fka Kranson Industries, Inc.) |
Containers/Glass Products |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 5/3/2018 | $ | 1,836,625 | 1,831,636 | 1,776,935 | ||||||||||||||||
Truven Health Analytics Inc. (fka Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc.) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
New Tranche B Term Loan |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 6/6/2019 | $ | 482,603 | 476,598 | 480,494 | ||||||||||||||||
Twin River Management Group, Inc. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.25 | % | 7/10/2020 | $ | 886,192 | 887,853 | 875,673 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Security Associates Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Delayed Draw Loan | Loan | 6.25 | % | 7/28/2017 | $ | 156,888 | 156,328 | 155,973 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Security Associates Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 6.25 | % | 7/28/2017 | $ | 921,426 | 918,393 | 916,054 | ||||||||||||||||
Univar Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term B Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 7/1/2022 | $ | 2,992,500 | 2,978,573 | 2,840,810 | ||||||||||||||||
Univision Communications Inc. |
Telecommunications | Replacement First- Lien Term Loan |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 3/1/2020 | $ | 2,916,556 | 2,903,859 | 2,832,705 | ||||||||||||||||
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. |
Drugs | Series D2 Term Loan B |
Loan | 3.50 | % | 2/13/2019 | $ | 2,545,588 | 2,539,315 | 2,385,700 | ||||||||||||||||
Verint Systems Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 9/6/2019 | $ | 1,014,058 | 1,011,203 | 1,005,692 | ||||||||||||||||
Vertafore, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 4.25 | % | 10/3/2019 | $ | 2,484,603 | 2,484,603 | 2,452,775 | ||||||||||||||||
Vizient Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 6.25 | % | 2/13/2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | 970,144 | 993,750 | ||||||||||||||||
Vouvray US Finance |
Industrial Equipment |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 6/27/2021 | $ | 492,500 | 490,508 | 478,134 |
S-11
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Inventory Service |
Services: Business | |
U.S. Term Loan (First Lien) |
|
Loan | 5.75 | % | 12/20/2018 | $ | 1,736,392 | 1,749,291 | 1,475,934 | ||||||||||||||||||||
West Corporation |
Telecommunications | |
Term B-10 Loan |
|
Loan | 3.25 | % | 6/30/2018 | $ | 2,534,892 | 2,558,782 | 2,490,861 | ||||||||||||||||||||
ZEP Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | |
Term Loan B |
|
Loan | 5.50 | % | 6/27/2022 | $ | 2,985,000 | 2,971,139 | 2,932,763 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 303,643,756 | $ | 284,844,789 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||||||
U.S. Bank Money Market (a) |
$ | 2,349,633 | $ | 2,349,633 | $ | 2,349,633 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,349,633 | $ | 2,349,633 | $ | 2,349,633 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Included within cash and cash equivalents in Saratoga CLOs Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of February 29, 2016. |
S-12
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1 Ltd.
Schedule of Investments
February 28, 2015
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
Education Management II LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
A-1 Preferred Shares | Equity | 0.00 | % | 6,692 | $ | 669,214 | $ | 437,188 | ||||||||||||||||
Education Management II LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
A-2 Preferred Shares | Equity | 0.00 | % | 18,975 | 1,897,538 | 180,263 | ||||||||||||||||||
24 Hour Holdings III LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 5/28/2021 | $ | 497,500 | 493,004 | 492,276 | ||||||||||||||||
Acosta Holdco Inc. |
Media | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 9/27/2021 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,981,328 | 2,004,416 | ||||||||||||||||
Aderant North America, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.25 | % | 12/20/2018 | $ | 3,260,898 | 3,260,898 | 3,240,517 | ||||||||||||||||
Advantage Sales & Marketing Inc. |
Services: Business | Delayed Draw Term Loan |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 7/25/2021 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,993,940 | 1,984,287 | ||||||||||||||||
AECOM Technology Corporation |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.75 | % | 10/15/2021 | $ | 319,903 | 318,380 | 321,304 | ||||||||||||||||
Aegis Toxicology Science Corporation |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term B Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 2/24/2021 | $ | 995,000 | 995,000 | 997,488 | ||||||||||||||||
Akorn, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 4/16/2021 | $ | 498,750 | 496,691 | 500,411 | ||||||||||||||||
Albertsons LLC |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan B-4 | Loan | 5.50 | % | 8/25/2021 | $ | 3,410,000 | 3,389,632 | 3,437,723 | ||||||||||||||||
Alere Inc. (fka IM US Holdings, LLC) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Incremental B-1 Term Loan |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 6/30/2017 | $ | 1,529,610 | 1,529,610 | 1,529,610 | ||||||||||||||||
American Tire Distributors Inc |
Automotive | Term Loan | Loan | 5.75 | % | 6/1/2018 | $ | 496,487 | 496,486 | 497,108 | ||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | LC-2 Facility | Loan | 3.74 | % | 7/26/2016 | $ | 79,187 | 79,178 | 78,395 | ||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | LC-3 Facility | Loan | 3.74 | % | 7/26/2016 | $ | 43,961 | 43,961 | 43,521 | ||||||||||||||||
Aramark Corporation |
Food Products | U.S. Term F Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 2/24/2021 | $ | 3,182,489 | 3,182,489 | 3,168,581 | ||||||||||||||||
ARG IH Corp |
Food Services | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 11/15/2020 | $ | 495,000 | 494,038 | 495,312 | ||||||||||||||||
Asurion, LLC (fka Asurion Corporation) |
Insurance | Incremental Tranche B-1 Term Loan |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 5/24/2019 | $ | 5,412,086 | 5,370,590 | 5,424,642 | ||||||||||||||||
Auction.Com, LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan A-4 | Loan | 4.40 | % | 2/28/2017 | $ | 914,567 | 914,567 | 905,422 | ||||||||||||||||
Avantor Performance Materials Holdings, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 6/24/2017 | $ | 4,319,115 | 4,309,242 | 4,297,520 | ||||||||||||||||
Avast Software |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 3/20/2020 | $ | 1,925,000 | 1,923,275 | 1,937,031 | ||||||||||||||||
AZ Chem US Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 6/12/2021 | $ | 467,123 | 464,958 | 466,614 | ||||||||||||||||
Bass Pro Group, LLC |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
New Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 11/20/2019 | $ | 493,623 | 493,111 | 492,236 | ||||||||||||||||
Bayonne Energy Center |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 8/19/2021 | $ | 969,671 | 965,093 | 964,416 | ||||||||||||||||
Belmond Hotels |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 3/19/2021 | $ | 496,250 | 494,055 | 495,009 | ||||||||||||||||
Berry Plastics Corporation |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term E Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1/6/2021 | $ | 1,814,499 | 1,802,403 | 1,812,648 | ||||||||||||||||
Big Heart Pet Brands (fka Del Monte Corporation) |
Food/Drug Retailers | Initial Term Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 3/9/2020 | $ | 2,977,500 | 2,996,769 | 2,971,307 | ||||||||||||||||
Biomet, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Dollar Term B-2 Loan |
Loan | 3.65 | % | 7/25/2017 | $ | 1,840,718 | 1,840,718 | 1,838,601 |
S-13
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. |
Food/Drug Retailers |
New 2013 (November) Replacement Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 9/26/2019 | $ | 1,489,975 | 1,488,922 | 1,483,374 | ||||||||||||||||
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term B Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1/30/2019 | $ | 754,286 | 750,287 | 747,120 | ||||||||||||||||
Brickman Group Holdings, Inc. |
Brokers/Dealers/ Investment Houses |
Initial Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 12/18/2020 | $ | 1,491,237 | 1,478,800 | 1,478,935 | ||||||||||||||||
Brock Holdings III, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 3/16/2017 | $ | 1,938,503 | 1,952,391 | 1,904,580 | ||||||||||||||||
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term B-2 Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 8/13/2021 | $ | 1,945,000 | 1,935,814 | 1,942,219 | ||||||||||||||||
BWAY |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 8/14/2020 | $ | 995,000 | 985,881 | 998,423 | ||||||||||||||||
Caesars Entertainment Corp. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term B-7 Loan | Loan | 9.75 | % | 1/28/2018 | $ | 995,000 | 989,028 | 917,141 | ||||||||||||||||
Camp International Holding Company |
Aerospace and Defense |
2013 Replacement Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 5/31/2019 | $ | 1,960,046 | 1,965,495 | 1,969,846 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital Automotive L.P. |
Conglomerate | Tranche B-1 Term Loan Facility |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 4/10/2019 | $ | 2,079,313 | 2,083,783 | 2,084,511 | ||||||||||||||||
Catalent Pharma Solutions, Inc |
Drugs | Initial Term B Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 5/20/2021 | $ | 497,500 | 495,170 | 498,401 | ||||||||||||||||
Celanese US Holdings LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Dollar Term C-2 Commitment |
Loan | 2.49 | % | 10/31/2018 | $ | 2,154,560 | 2,180,598 | 2,157,533 | ||||||||||||||||
Cengage Learning |
Publishing | Term Loan | Loan | 7.00 | % | 3/31/2020 | $ | 2,731,869 | 2,761,735 | 2,733,235 | ||||||||||||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC |
Cable and Satellite Television |
Term F Loan | Loan | 3.00 | % | 12/31/2020 | $ | 2,655,745 | 2,646,932 | 2,646,344 | ||||||||||||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
2017 Term E Loan | Loan | 3.49 | % | 1/25/2017 | $ | 1,097,818 | 1,074,945 | 1,097,193 | ||||||||||||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
2021 Term D Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 1/27/2021 | $ | 2,926,052 | 2,844,886 | 2,935,210 | ||||||||||||||||
Cinedigm Digital Funding I, LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 2/28/2018 | $ | 562,001 | 557,872 | 561,298 | ||||||||||||||||
CITGO Petroleum |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 7/29/2021 | $ | 997,500 | 994,095 | 979,106 | ||||||||||||||||
ClubCorp Club Operations, Inc. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 7/24/2020 | $ | 500,000 | 496,250 | 500,315 | ||||||||||||||||
CPI International Acquisition, Inc. (f/k/a Catalyst Holdings, Inc.) |
Electronics/Electric | Term B Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 11/17/2017 | $ | 3,595,331 | 3,595,331 | 3,570,631 | ||||||||||||||||
Crosby US Acquisition Corp. |
Industrial Equipment | Initial Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 3.75 | % | 11/23/2020 | $ | 742,500 | 741,718 | 681,244 | ||||||||||||||||
Crown Castle Operating Company |
Telecommunications/ Cellular |
Extended Incremental Tranche B-2 Term Loan |
Loan | 3.00 | % | 1/31/2021 | $ | 2,435,594 | 2,433,546 | 2,430,723 | ||||||||||||||||
CT Technologies Intermediate Hldgs, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 12/1/2021 | $ | 1,500,000 | 1,485,423 | 1,505,625 | ||||||||||||||||
Culligan International Company |
Conglomerate | Dollar Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.25 | % | 12/19/2017 | $ | 779,642 | 736,275 | 765,998 | ||||||||||||||||
Culligan International Company |
Conglomerate | Dollar Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 9.50 | % | 6/19/2018 | $ | 783,162 | 739,367 | 727,033 | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulus Media Holdings Inc. |
Broadcast Radio and Television |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 12/23/2020 | $ | 470,093 | 466,100 | 466,863 | ||||||||||||||||
Custom Sensors |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 9/30/2021 | $ | 498,750 | 497,651 | 498,750 |
S-14
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. (fka DaVita Inc.) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Tranche B Term Loan |
Loan | 3.50 | % | 6/24/2021 | $ | 497,500 | 495,228 | 498,062 | ||||||||||||||||
DCS Business Services, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries |
Term B Loan | Loan | 7.25 | % | 3/19/2018 | $ | 3,460,027 | 3,436,485 | 3,413,835 | ||||||||||||||||
Dealertrack Technologies, Inc. |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term B Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 2/26/2021 | $ | 477,011 | 475,991 | 474,230 | ||||||||||||||||
Dell International LLC |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term B Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 4/29/2020 | $ | 2,969,962 | 2,957,576 | 2,980,684 | ||||||||||||||||
Delos Finance SARL |
Financial Intermediaries |
Term Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 3/6/2021 | $ | 500,000 | 497,835 | 499,790 | ||||||||||||||||
Delta 2 (Lux) S.a.r.l. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan B-3 | Loan | 4.75 | % | 7/30/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,314 | 995,630 | ||||||||||||||||
Deluxe Entertainment Service Group, Inc. |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.50 | % | 2/28/2020 | $ | 1,882,983 | 1,884,624 | 1,835,908 | ||||||||||||||||
Devix US, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 5/2/2021 | $ | 250,000 | 247,710 | 250,938 | ||||||||||||||||
Devix US, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 8.00 | % | 5/2/2022 | $ | 497,500 | 495,324 | 497,500 | ||||||||||||||||
Diamond Resorts International |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 5/9/2021 | $ | 995,000 | 990,370 | 999,975 | ||||||||||||||||
Dollar Tree |
Retail | Term Loan B (3950MM) |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 3/9/2022 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,000 | 1,007,500 | ||||||||||||||||
DPX Holdings B.V. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.25 | % | 3/11/2021 | $ | 2,985,000 | 2,978,605 | 2,962,075 | ||||||||||||||||
Drew Marine Group Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 11/19/2020 | $ | 1,489,975 | 1,495,721 | 1,473,213 | ||||||||||||||||
Education Management LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan A | Loan | 5.50 | % | 7/2/2020 | $ | 501,970 | 482,120 | 457,295 | ||||||||||||||||
Education Management LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B | Loan | |
8.50 (2.00 Cash/6.50 PIK |
% % % ) |
7/2/2020 | $ | 836,617 | 805,283 | 672,882 | |||||||||||||||
EIG Investors Corp. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 11/8/2019 | $ | 987,500 | 983,552 | 989,969 | ||||||||||||||||
Emerald Performance Materials, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 8/1/2021 | $ | 498,750 | 496,403 | 496,102 | ||||||||||||||||
Emerald Performance Materials, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 7.75 | % | 8/1/2022 | $ | 500,000 | 497,553 | 484,845 | ||||||||||||||||
EnergySolutions, LLC |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.75 | % | 5/29/2020 | $ | 937,857 | 921,126 | 942,546 | ||||||||||||||||
Enviromental Resources Management |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 5/14/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,000 | 985,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Evergreen Acqco 1 LP |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
New Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 7/9/2019 | $ | 975,056 | 972,887 | 955,555 | ||||||||||||||||
EWT Holdings III Corp. (fka WTG Holdings III Corp.) |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 1/15/2021 | $ | 1,987,481 | 1,982,274 | 1,972,575 | ||||||||||||||||
Federal-Mogul Corporation |
Automotive | Tranche C Term Loan |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 4/15/2021 | $ | 2,985,000 | 2,971,883 | 2,975,687 | ||||||||||||||||
First Data Corporation |
Financial Intermediaries |
2017 Second New Dollar Term Loan |
Loan | 3.74 | % | 3/23/2018 | $ | 2,790,451 | 2,729,399 | 2,785,568 | ||||||||||||||||
First Data Corporation |
Financial Intermediaries |
2018 Dollar Term Loan |
Loan | 4.24 | % | 3/24/2021 | $ | 2,111,028 | 2,021,476 | 2,115,777 | ||||||||||||||||
Fitness International, LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 7/1/2020 | $ | 1,492,500 | 1,482,322 | 1,421,606 | ||||||||||||||||
FMG Resources (August 2006) Pty LTD (FMG America Finance, Inc.) |
Nonferrous Metals/ Minerals |
Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 6/28/2019 | $ | 1,982,462 | 1,982,212 | 1,835,423 |
S-15
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
Four Seasons Holdings Inc. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 3.50 | % | 6/27/2020 | $ | 493,750 | 493,750 | 491,281 | ||||||||||||||||
Garda World Security Corporation |
Services: Business | Term B Delayed Draw Loan |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 11/6/2020 | $ | 201,157 | 200,308 | 199,146 | ||||||||||||||||
Garda World Security Corporation |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 11/6/2020 | $ | 786,343 | 783,060 | 778,479 | ||||||||||||||||
Gardner Denver, Inc. |
Oil & Gas | Initial Dollar Term Loan |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 7/30/2020 | $ | 2,476,212 | 2,467,608 | 2,377,164 | ||||||||||||||||
Gates Global LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 7/3/2021 | $ | 498,750 | 493,763 | 494,885 | ||||||||||||||||
Generac Power Systems, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan B | Loan | 3.25 | % | 5/29/2020 | $ | 802,956 | 789,932 | 797,182 | ||||||||||||||||
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Amended Tranche B Term Loan |
Loan | 3.25 | % | 3/4/2019 | $ | 4,724,136 | 4,709,712 | 4,649,353 | ||||||||||||||||
Global Tel*Link Corporation |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 5/26/2020 | $ | 2,755,515 | 2,747,025 | 2,719,914 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The |
Chemicals/Plastics | Loan (Second Lien) | Loan | 4.75 | % | 4/30/2019 | $ | 3,333,333 | 3,296,753 | 3,347,933 | ||||||||||||||||
Grosvenor Capital Management Holdings, LP |
Brokers/Dealers/ Investment Houses |
Initial Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1/4/2021 | $ | 3,395,892 | 3,381,240 | 3,353,443 | ||||||||||||||||
GTCR Valor Companies, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 6/1/2021 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,981,582 | 1,965,075 | ||||||||||||||||
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (fka Clarke American Corp.) |
Publishing | Tranche B-4 Term Loan |
Loan | 6.00 | % | 8/2/2019 | $ | 487,500 | 485,460 | 488,963 | ||||||||||||||||
HCA Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Tranche B-4 Term Loan |
Loan | 2.99 | % | 5/1/2018 | $ | 5,663,006 | 5,409,534 | 5,658,872 | ||||||||||||||||
Hertz Corporation, The |
Automotive | Tranche B-1 Term Loan |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 3/12/2018 | $ | 2,940,000 | 2,975,234 | 2,927,152 | ||||||||||||||||
Hoffmaster Group, Inc. |
Containers/Glass Products |
Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 5/8/2020 | $ | 1,990,000 | 1,972,040 | 1,999,950 | ||||||||||||||||
Huntsman International LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Extended Term B Loan |
Loan | 2.69 | % | 4/19/2017 | $ | 3,880,270 | 3,866,113 | 3,872,199 | ||||||||||||||||
Husky Injection |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 6/30/2021 | $ | 498,099 | 495,886 | 495,818 | ||||||||||||||||
Ikaria, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Initial Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 2/12/2021 | $ | 435,702 | 433,809 | 434,251 | ||||||||||||||||
Infor (US), Inc. (fka Lawson Software Inc.) |
Services: Business | Tranche B-5 Term Loan |
Loan | 3.75 | % | 6/3/2020 | $ | 2,211,036 | 2,194,068 | 2,190,650 | ||||||||||||||||
Insight Global |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 6.00 | % | 10/29/2021 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,990,539 | 1,993,760 | ||||||||||||||||
J. Crew Group, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term B-1 Loan Retired 03/05/2014 |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 3/5/2021 | $ | 965,206 | 965,206 | 906,493 | ||||||||||||||||
Jazz Acquisition, Inc |
Aerospace and Defense |
First Lien 6/14 | Loan | 4.50 | % | 6/19/2021 | $ | 497,576 | 496,332 | 492,913 | ||||||||||||||||
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Dollar Term D-1 Loan |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 5/4/2018 | $ | 2,477,613 | 2,453,687 | 2,477,167 | ||||||||||||||||
Koosharem, LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 7.50 | % | 5/15/2020 | $ | 2,995,000 | 2,968,450 | 2,961,306 | ||||||||||||||||
La Quinta Holdings, Inc. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 4/14/2021 | $ | 451,283 | 449,626 | 450,719 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 3 Financing, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.50 | % | 1/31/2022 | $ | 500,000 | 496,541 | 502,085 | ||||||||||||||||
Mauser Holdings, Inc. |
Containers/Glass Products |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 7/31/2021 | $ | 498,750 | 496,409 | 491,269 | ||||||||||||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term B Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 1/28/2020 | $ | 491,250 | 491,250 | 488,258 |
S-16
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan B-2 | Loan | 4.00 | % | 1/28/2020 | $ | 1,492,500 | 1,485,638 | 1,488,769 | ||||||||||||||||
Microsemi Corporation |
Electronics/Electric | Incremental Term Loan |
Loan | 3.50 | % | 2/19/2020 | $ | 2,393,981 | 2,389,500 | 2,381,509 | ||||||||||||||||
Microsemi Corporation |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 2/19/2020 | $ | 172,170 | 172,170 | 171,309 | ||||||||||||||||
Midas Intermediate Holdco II, LLC |
Automotive | Delayed Draw Term Loan |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 8/18/2021 | $ | 25,253 | 25,253 | 25,364 | ||||||||||||||||
Midas Intermediate Holdco II, LLC |
Automotive | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.75 | % | 8/18/2021 | $ | 224,122 | 223,063 | 225,103 | ||||||||||||||||
Millenium Laboratories, LLC |
Drugs | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 4/16/2021 | $ | 1,492,500 | 1,479,041 | 1,489,396 | ||||||||||||||||
Mitel US Holdings, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 1/31/2020 | $ | 196,558 | 195,710 | 196,411 | ||||||||||||||||
MPH Acquisition Holdings LLC |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 3/31/2021 | $ | 445,455 | 444,453 | 442,033 | ||||||||||||||||
MSC Software Corp. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 5/29/2020 | $ | 995,000 | 986,186 | 996,244 | ||||||||||||||||
National CineMedia, LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 2.95 | % | 11/26/2019 | $ | 1,086,207 | 1,058,933 | 1,067,198 | ||||||||||||||||
National Veterinary Associates, Inc |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.75 | % | 8/14/2021 | $ | 997,500 | 992,907 | 996,253 | ||||||||||||||||
National Vision, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 6.75 | % | 3/11/2022 | $ | 250,000 | 249,730 | 240,418 | ||||||||||||||||
Newsday, LLC |
Publishing | Term Loan | Loan | 3.69 | % | 10/12/2016 | $ | 2,215,385 | 2,214,305 | 2,201,538 | ||||||||||||||||
Nortek, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 10/30/2020 | $ | 995,000 | 992,803 | 986,921 | ||||||||||||||||
Novelis, Inc. |
Conglomerate | Initial Term Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 3/10/2017 | $ | 4,807,530 | 4,817,740 | 4,799,502 | ||||||||||||||||
NPC International, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 4.00 | % | 12/28/2018 | $ | 486,250 | 486,250 | 480,780 | ||||||||||||||||
NRG Energy, Inc. |
Utilities | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 2.75 | % | 7/2/2018 | $ | 3,861,225 | 3,842,164 | 3,850,761 | ||||||||||||||||
NuSil Technology LLC. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 4/7/2017 | $ | 797,986 | 797,986 | 791,004 | ||||||||||||||||
Ollies Bargain Outlet, Inc |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 9/30/2019 | $ | 977,052 | 972,882 | 962,396 | ||||||||||||||||
On Assignment, Inc. |
Services: Business | Initial Term B Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 5/15/2020 | $ | 1,311,364 | 1,303,451 | 1,301,528 | ||||||||||||||||
Onex Carestream Finance LP |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan (First Lien 2013) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 6/7/2019 | $ | 4,074,401 | 4,059,378 | 4,078,842 | ||||||||||||||||
OnexYork Acquisition Co |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Delayed Draw Term Loan |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | | | | ||||||||||||||||
OnexYork Acquisition Co |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 4.75 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 498,750 | 495,208 | 496,466 | ||||||||||||||||
OpenLink International LLC |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 6.25 | % | 10/28/2017 | $ | 970,000 | 970,000 | 957,875 | ||||||||||||||||
Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 4/15/2021 | $ | 1,494,994 | 1,492,711 | 1,494,755 | ||||||||||||||||
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. (Wok Acquisition Corp.) |
Food/Drug Retailers | Term Borrowing | Loan | 4.25 | % | 6/24/2019 | $ | 1,447,901 | 1,440,712 | 1,406,274 | ||||||||||||||||
P2 Upstream Acquisition Co. (P2 Upstream Canada BC ULC) |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 10/30/2020 | $ | 990,000 | 985,444 | 947,925 | ||||||||||||||||
Par Pharmaceutical |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B3 | Loan | 4.25 | % | 9/28/2019 | $ | 500,000 | 497,502 | 499,065 | ||||||||||||||||
PetCo Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. |
Retailers (Except Food and Drugs) |
New Loans | Loan | 4.00 | % | 11/24/2017 | $ | 1,469,388 | 1,468,520 | 1,467,066 | ||||||||||||||||
PetSmart |
Retail | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.00 | % | 3/11/2022 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,000 | 1,007,050 | ||||||||||||||||
PGX Holdings, Inc. |
Financial Intermediaries |
Term Loan | Loan | 6.25 | % | 9/29/2020 | $ | 993,750 | 984,482 | 993,750 |
S-17
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (Jaguar Holdings, LLC) |
Conglomerate | 2013 Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 12/5/2018 | $ | 1,940,400 | 1,918,409 | 1,935,898 | ||||||||||||||||
Phillips-Medisize Corporation |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 6/16/2021 | $ | 497,500 | 495,245 | 495,948 | ||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC |
Food Products | New Term Loan G | Loan | 3.00 | % | 4/29/2020 | $ | 2,581,332 | 2,576,466 | 2,565,560 | ||||||||||||||||
Planet Fitness Holdings LLC |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 3/31/2021 | $ | 1,488,750 | 1,482,052 | 1,488,750 | ||||||||||||||||
Polymer Group, Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Initial Loan | Loan | 5.25 | % | 12/19/2019 | $ | 495,000 | 492,860 | 495,619 | ||||||||||||||||
Presidio |
Services: Business | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.25 | % | 2/2/2022 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,940,655 | 1,973,760 | ||||||||||||||||
Prestige Brands, Inc. |
Drugs | Term B-1 Loan | Loan | 4.13 | % | 1/31/2019 | $ | 344,697 | 341,112 | 344,697 | ||||||||||||||||
Prestige Brands, Inc. |
Leisure Goods/ Activities/Movies |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 9/3/2021 | $ | 1,861,111 | 1,858,280 | 1,860,534 | ||||||||||||||||
QoL Meds, LLC |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 7/15/2020 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,985,909 | 1,990,013 | ||||||||||||||||
Quintiles Transnational Corp. |
Conglomerate | Term B-3 Loan | Loan | 3.75 | % | 6/8/2018 | $ | 3,627,678 | 3,600,425 | 3,628,802 | ||||||||||||||||
Ranpak Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 997,500 | 995,145 | 996,882 | ||||||||||||||||
Ranpak Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 8.25 | % | 9/30/2022 | $ | 500,000 | 497,672 | 496,250 | ||||||||||||||||
Redtop Acquisitions Limited |
Electronics/Electric | Initial Dollar Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 12/3/2020 | $ | 495,000 | 491,974 | 494,381 | ||||||||||||||||
Rexnord LLC/RBS Global, Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Term B Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 8/21/2020 | $ | 1,646,799 | 1,648,172 | 1,642,172 | ||||||||||||||||
Reynolds Group Holdings Inc. |
Industrial Equipment | Incremental U.S. Term Loan |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 12/1/2018 | $ | 1,960,200 | 1,960,200 | 1,965,767 | ||||||||||||||||
Riverbed Technology |
Technology | Term Loan B | Loan | 6.00 | % | 2/25/2022 | $ | 1,000,000 | 995,000 | 1,007,500 | ||||||||||||||||
Rocket Software, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.75 | % | 2/8/2018 | $ | 1,916,674 | 1,898,764 | 1,906,285 | ||||||||||||||||
Rovi Solutions Corporation / Rovi Guides, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Tranche B-3 Term Loan |
Loan | 3.75 | % | 7/2/2021 | $ | 1,492,500 | 1,485,607 | 1,479,441 | ||||||||||||||||
RPI Finance Trust |
Drugs | Term B-2 Term Loan |
Loan | 3.25 | % | 5/9/2018 | $ | 5,207,431 | 5,188,396 | 5,219,147 | ||||||||||||||||
SBP Holdings LP |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.00 | % | 3/27/2021 | $ | 992,500 | 988,065 | 863,475 | ||||||||||||||||
Scientific Games International, Inc. |
Electronics/Electric | Term Loan B2 | Loan | 6.00 | % | 10/1/2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | 990,433 | 998,040 | ||||||||||||||||
Scitor Corporation |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 2/15/2017 | $ | 463,977 | 462,387 | 461,077 | ||||||||||||||||
Seadrill |
Oil & Gas | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.00 | % | 2/21/2021 | $ | 997,481 | 917,590 | 806,294 | ||||||||||||||||
Sensata Technologies B.V./Sensata Technology Finance Company, LLC |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 5/13/2019 | $ | 1,509,445 | 1,509,445 | 1,511,603 | ||||||||||||||||
Sensus USA Inc. (fka Sensus Metering Systems) |
Utilities | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 5/9/2017 | $ | 1,925,067 | 1,920,548 | 1,925,067 | ||||||||||||||||
ServiceMaster Company, The |
Conglomerate | Tranche B Term Loan |
Loan | 4.25 | % | 7/1/2021 | $ | 1,995,000 | 1,976,650 | 1,994,641 | ||||||||||||||||
Shearers Foods LLC |
Food Services | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 6/30/2021 | $ | 997,500 | 995,166 | 996,253 | ||||||||||||||||
Sonneborn, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 5.50 | % | 12/10/2020 | $ | 225,000 | 224,471 | 225,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Sonneborn, LLC |
Chemicals/Plastics | Initial US Term Loan |
Loan | 5.50 | % | 12/10/2020 | $ | 1,275,000 | 1,272,004 | 1,275,000 |
S-18
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
Sophia, L.P. |
Electronics/Electric | Term B Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 7/19/2018 | $ | 886,138 | 877,732 | 884,756 | ||||||||||||||||
SourceHOV LLC |
Services: Business | Term Loan B (First Lien) |
Loan | 7.75 | % | 10/31/2019 | $ | 2,000,000 | 1,942,284 | 1,915,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Southwire Company, LLC (f.k.a Southwire Company) |
Building and Development |
Initial Term Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 2/10/2021 | $ | 496,250 | 495,181 | 485,084 | ||||||||||||||||
SRAM, LLC |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan (First Lien) |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 4/10/2020 | $ | 2,967,681 | 2,957,888 | 2,952,842 | ||||||||||||||||
Steak n Shake Operations, Inc. |
Food Services | Term Loan | Loan | 4.75 | % | 3/19/2021 | $ | 992,500 | 983,723 | 975,131 | ||||||||||||||||
STHI Holding |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.50 | % | 8/6/2021 | $ | 997,500 | 997,500 | 994,388 | ||||||||||||||||
SunGard Data Systems Inc. (Solar Capital Corp.) |
Conglomerate | Tranche C Term Loan |
Loan | 3.90 | % | 2/28/2017 | $ | 285,352 | 283,117 | 285,084 | ||||||||||||||||
SunGard Data Systems Inc. (Solar Capital Corp.) |
Conglomerate | Tranche E Term Loan |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 3/9/2020 | $ | 3,707,953 | 3,618,899 | 3,706,804 | ||||||||||||||||
SuperMedia Inc. (fka Idearc Inc.) |
Publishing | Loan | Loan | 11.60 | % | 12/30/2016 | $ | 238,660 | 232,462 | 203,756 | ||||||||||||||||
Syniverse Holdings, Inc. |
Telecommunications | Initial Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 4/23/2019 | $ | 479,913 | 476,105 | 473,314 | ||||||||||||||||
TGI Fridays |
Food Services | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.25 | % | 7/15/2020 | $ | 267,977 | 266,768 | 267,642 | ||||||||||||||||
TGI Fridays |
Food Services | Term Loan (Second Lien) |
Loan | 9.25 | % | 7/15/2021 | $ | 2,000,000 | 2,016,250 | 2,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||
TPF II Power LLC and TPF II Covert Midco LLC |
Utilities | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.50 | % | 10/2/2021 | $ | 500,000 | 496,689 | 504,790 | ||||||||||||||||
TransDigm, Inc. |
Aerospace and Defense |
Tranche C Term Loan |
Loan | 3.75 | % | 2/28/2020 | $ | 4,847,054 | 4,856,484 | 4,824,661 | ||||||||||||||||
TransFirst |
Financial Intermediaries |
Term Loan | Loan | 5.50 | % | 11/12/2021 | $ | 500,000 | 495,182 | 502,815 | ||||||||||||||||
TransUnion |
Financial Intermediaries |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 4/9/2021 | $ | 496,250 | 495,138 | 493,977 | ||||||||||||||||
Tricorbraun, Inc. (fka Kranson Industries, Inc.) |
Containers/Glass Products |
Term Loan | Loan | 4.00 | % | 5/3/2018 | $ | 1,850,000 | 1,843,008 | 1,822,250 | ||||||||||||||||
Truven Health Analytics Inc. (fka Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc.) |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
New Tranche B Term Loan |
Loan | 4.50 | % | 6/6/2019 | $ | 487,566 | 479,874 | 481,471 | ||||||||||||||||
Twin River Management Group, Inc. |
Lodging & Casinos | Term Loan B | Loan | 5.25 | % | 7/10/2020 | $ | 974,167 | 976,455 | 975,998 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Security Associates Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Delayed Draw Loan | Loan | 6.25 | % | 7/28/2017 | $ | 158,518 | 157,610 | 156,734 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Security Associates Holdings, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term B Loan | Loan | 6.25 | % | 7/28/2017 | $ | 931,046 | 926,144 | 920,572 | ||||||||||||||||
United Surgical Partners International, Inc. |
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals |
New Tranche B Term Loan |
Loan | 4.75 | % | 4/3/2019 | $ | 2,431,749 | 2,408,580 | 2,431,749 | ||||||||||||||||
Univar Inc. |
Chemicals/Plastics | Term B Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 6/30/2017 | $ | 3,844,964 | 3,844,749 | 3,813,935 | ||||||||||||||||
Univision Communications Inc. |
Telecommunications | Replacement First- Lien Term Loan |
Loan | 4.00 | % | 3/1/2020 | $ | 2,947,446 | 2,931,982 | 2,940,549 | ||||||||||||||||
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. |
Drugs | Series D2 Term Loan B |
Loan | 3.50 | % | 2/13/2019 | $ | 2,545,588 | 2,537,415 | 2,539,683 | ||||||||||||||||
Verint Systems Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan | Loan | 3.50 | % | 9/6/2019 | $ | 1,264,058 | 1,259,623 | 1,259,634 | ||||||||||||||||
Vertafore, Inc. |
Services: Business | Term Loan (2013) | Loan | 4.25 | % | 10/3/2019 | $ | 2,881,003 | 2,881,003 | 2,878,294 | ||||||||||||||||
Vouvray US Finance |
Industrial Equipment | Term Loan | Loan | 5.00 | % | 6/28/2021 | $ | 497,500 | 495,243 | 499,366 |
S-19
Issuer Name |
Industry | Asset Name | Asset Type |
Current Rate |
Maturity Date |
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Inventory Service |
Services: Business | |
U.S. Term Loan (First Lien) |
|
Loan | 5.75 | % | 12/20/2018 | $ | 1,832,876 | 1,851,978 | 1,796,218 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Waste Industries |
Environmental | Term Loan B | Loan | 4.25 | % | 2/27/2020 | $ | 250,000 | 249,375 | 250,520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Wendys International, Inc |
Food Services | Term B Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 5/15/2019 | $ | 673,630 | 668,099 | 670,545 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
West Corporation |
Telecommunications | Term B-10 Loan | Loan | 3.25 | % | 6/30/2018 | $ | 2,571,560 | 2,605,923 | 2,562,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 297,760,340 | $ | 295,239,268 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Principal/ Number of Shares |
Cost | Fair Value |
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||||||
U.S. Bank Money Market(a) |
$ | 5,831,797 | $ | 5,831,797 | $ | 5,831,797 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 5,831,797 | $ | 5,831,797 | $ | 5,831,797 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | Included within cash and cash equivalents in Saratoga CLOs Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of February 28, 2015. |
S-20
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
For the year ended February 29, 2016 |
For the year ended February 28, 2015 |
For the year ended February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||
INCREASE FROM OPERATIONS: |
||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$ | 104,587 | $ | 793,848 | $ | (2,143,630 | ) | |||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investments |
419,096 | 620,817 | (8,815,296 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(16,277,895 | ) | (3,874,583 | ) | 6,776,871 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net decrease in net assets from operations |
(15,754,212 | ) | (2,459,918 | ) | (4,182,055 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total decrease in net assets |
(15,754,212 | ) | (2,459,918 | ) | (4,182,055 | ) | ||||||
Net assets at beginning of period |
(5,803,156 | ) | (3,343,238 | ) | 838,817 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net assets at end of period |
$ | (21,557,368 | ) | $ | (5,803,156 | ) | $ | (3,343,238 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
S-21
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.
For the year ended February 29, 2016 |
For the year ended February 28, 2015 |
For the year ended February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | (15,754,212 | ) | $ | (2,459,918 | ) | $ | (4,182,055 | ) | |||
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED BY) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Paid-in-kind interest income |
(56,830 | ) | (167,097 | ) | (10,122 | ) | ||||||
Net accretion of discount on investments |
(280,310 | ) | (454,809 | ) | (568,674 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of deferred debt financing costs |
955,858 | 953,862 | 994,602 | |||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | 3,442,442 | |||||||||
Net realized (gain) loss from investments |
(419,096 | ) | (620,817 | ) | 8,815,296 | |||||||
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments |
16,277,895 | 3,874,583 | (6,776,871 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale and redemption of investments |
142,862,138 | 141,358,326 | 128,190,654 | |||||||||
Purchase of investments |
(147,989,317 | ) | (138,738,379 | ) | (55,721,381 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in operating assets: |
||||||||||||
Interest receivable |
(407,925 | ) | 160,315 | 134,033 | ||||||||
Receivable from open trades |
(572,144 | ) | (318,421 | ) | 3,330,272 | |||||||
Other assets |
| 91,336 | (91,336 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Interest payable |
(5,846 | ) | 9,410 | (43,645 | ) | |||||||
Payable from open trades |
1,909,523 | (4,230,669 | ) | (6,901,250 | ) | |||||||
Accrued base management fee |
(949 | ) | 10,904 | 31,882 | ||||||||
Accrued subordinated management fee |
(949 | ) | 10,904 | (97,629 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH (USED BY) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
(3,482,164 | ) | (520,470 | ) | 70,546,218 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||
Borrowings on debt |
| | 277,711,620 | |||||||||
Paydowns on debt |
| (1,666,666 | ) | (366,793,378 | ) | |||||||
Deferred debt financing costs |
| | (2,250,398 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET CASH USED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
| (1,666,666 | ) | (91,332,156 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(3,482,164 | ) | (2,187,136 | ) | (20,785,938 | ) | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
5,831,797 | 8,018,933 | 28,804,871 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 2,349,633 | $ | 5,831,797 | $ | 8,018,933 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||
Interest paid during the period |
$ | 11,702,603 | $ | 9,625,726 | $ | 11,722,159 | ||||||
Supplemental non-cash information: |
||||||||||||
Paid-in-kind interest income |
$ | 56,830 | $ | 167,097 | $ | 10,122 | ||||||
Net accretion of discount on investments |
$ | 280,310 | $ | 454,809 | $ | 568,674 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred debt financing costs |
$ | 955,858 | $ | 953,862 | $ | 994,602 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
S-22
SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP. CLO 2013-1, LTD.
1. Organization and Purpose
Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (the Issuer, we, our, us, CLO and Saratoga CLO), an exempted company with limited liability incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands was formed on November 28, 2007 and commenced operations on January 22, 2008. The Issuer was established to acquire or participate in U.S. dollar-denominated corporate debt obligations.
On January 22, 2008, the Issuer issued $400.0 million of notes, consisting of Class A Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes (collectively the Secured Notes), and Subordinated Notes. The notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated January 22, 2008 (the Indenture), with U.S. Bank National Association (the Trustee) servicing as the Trustee there under.
On October 17, 2013, in a refinancing transaction, the Issuer issued $284.9 million of notes (the 2013-1 CLO Notes), consisting of Class X Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, and Class F Deferrable Floating Rate Notes. The 2013-1 CLO Notes were issued pursuant to the Indenture with the same Trustee. Proceeds of the issuance of the 2013-1 CLO Notes were used, along with existing assets held by the Trustee, to redeem all of the Secured Notes issued in 2008. As of February 29, 2016, Saratoga Investment Corp. owned 100% of the Subordinated Notes of the CLO.
Pursuant to an investment management agreement (the Investment Management Agreement), Saratoga Investment Corp. (the Investment Manager), provides investment management services to the Issuer, and makes day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of the Issuer. The Investment Manager also performs certain administrative services on behalf of the Issuer under the Investment Management Agreement.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and are stated in U.S. dollars. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Issuer in the preparation of its financial statements.
The Issuer is considered to be an investment company for financial reporting purposes and has applied the guidance in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 946, Financial ServicesInvestment Companies. There has been no change to the Issuers status as an investment company during the year ended February 29, 2016.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Investment Manager to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, including the fair value of investments, and the amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates and such differences could be material.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Issuer defines cash and cash equivalents as highly liquid financial instruments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents may include investments in money market mutual funds,
S-23
which are carried at fair value. At February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, cash and cash equivalents amounted to $2.3 million and $5.8 million, respectively, and are swept on an overnight basis into a money market deposit account and invested in shares of JP Morgan Liquidity Institutional fund held at the Trustee.
Valuation of Investments
The Issuer accounts for its investments at fair value in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. ASC 820 requires the Issuer to assume that its investments are to be sold at the statement of assets and liabilities date in the principal market to independent market participants, or in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market, which may be a hypothetical market. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are fair valued at such market quotations obtained from independent third party pricing services and market makers subject to any decision by the Investment Manager to approve a fair value determination to reflect significant events affecting the value of these investments. The Investment Manager values investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair value. Determinations of fair value may involve significant judgments and estimates. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments, market yield trend analysis, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.
Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The determination of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that are ultimately realized upon the disposal of such investments.
Investment Transactions and Income Recognition
Purchases and sales of investments and the related realized gains or losses are recorded on a trade-date basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Issuer stops accruing interest on its investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Discounts and premiums on investments purchased are accreted/amortized over the life of the respective investment using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortizations of premium on investments.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. Accrued interest is generally reserved when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as a reduction in principal depending upon the Investment Managers judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in managements judgment, are likely to remain current, although we may make exceptions to this general rule if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection.
Paid-in-Kind Interest
The Issuer holds debt investments in its portfolio that contain a PIK interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the investment balance that is generally due at maturity,
S-24
is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. We stop accruing PIK interest if we do not expect the issuer to be able to pay all principal and interest when due.
Deferred Debt Financing Costs, net
In April 2015, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-03, InterestImputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (ASU 2015-03). The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, and early adoption is allowed, and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. Management has adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 as of February 28, 2015, by reclassifying deferred debt financing costs from within total assets to within total liabilities as a contra-liability. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2015-03 did not materially impact the Issuers financial position or results of operations. Prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Included in deferred debt financing costs of $1.7 million as of February 29, 2016 and $1.9 million as of February 28, 2015 are structuring fees of the investment bank, rating agency fees and legal fees associated with the issuance of the 2013-1 CLO Notes on October 17, 2013. Such costs have been capitalized and amortized using an effective yield method, over the life of the related notes.
Deferred debt financing costs of $1.6 million, incurred in connection with the issuance of the Secured Notes, were expensed when the Secured Notes were extinguished on October 17, 2013.
Management Fees
The Issuer is externally managed by the Investment Manager pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement. As compensation for the performance of its obligations under the Investment Management Agreement, the Investment Manager is entitled to receive from the Issuer a base management fee (the Base Management Fee), a subordinated management fee (the Subordinated Management Fee) and an incentive management fee (the Incentive Management Fee). The Base Management Fee is payable in arrears quarterly (subject to availability of funds and to the satisfaction of payment obligations on the debt obligations of the Issuer (the Priority of Payments) in an amount equal to 0.25% per annum of the fee basis amount at the beginning of the collection period. The Subordinated Management Fee is payable in arrears quarterly (subject to availability of funds and to the Priority of Payments) in an amount equal to 0.25% per annum of the fee basis amount at the beginning of the Collection Period. The Incentive Management Fee equals 20% of the remaining interest proceeds and principal proceeds, if any, after the Subordinated Notes have realized the incentive management fee target return of 12.0%, in accordance with the Priority of Payments after making the prior distributions on the relevant payment date. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014, no Incentive Management Fees have been paid.
Expenses
The Issuer bears its own organizational and offering expenses, all expenses related to its investment program and expenses incurred in connection with its operations including, but not limited to, external legal, administrative, trustee, accounting, tax and audit expenses, costs related to trading, acquiring, monitoring or disposing of investments of the Issuer, and interest and other borrowing expenses, expenses of preparing and distributing reports, financial statements, and litigation or other extraordinary expenses. The Issuer has retained the Trustee to provide trustee services. Additionally, the Trustee performs loan administration, debt covenant compliance calculations, and monitoring and reporting services. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014, the Issuer paid $0.1 million, $0.1 million, $0.1 million, respectively, for trustee services provided and is included in other expenses in the statements of operations.
S-25
Interest Expense
The Issuer has issued rated and unrated notes to finance its operations. Interest on debt is calculated by the Trustee for the Issuer. Interest is accrued and generally paid quarterly. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014, $5.6 million, $3.7 million and $5.7 million of payments to the Subordinated Notes were included in interest expense on the statements of operations, respectively.
Risk Management
In the ordinary course of its business, the Issuer manages a variety of risks, including market risk and credit risk. Market risk is the risk of potential adverse changes to the value of investments because of changes in market conditions such as interest rate movements and volatility in investment prices.
Credit risk is the risk of default or non-performance by portfolio companies, equivalent to the investments carrying amount.
The Issuer is also exposed to credit risk related to maintaining all of its cash and cash equivalents, including those in reserve accounts, at a major financial institution.
The Issuer has investments in lower rated and comparable quality unrated high yield bonds and bank loans. Investments in high yield investments are accompanied by a greater degree of credit risk. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer is significantly greater for holders of high yield securities, because such investments are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01). ASU 2016-01 retains many current requirements for the classification and measurement of financial instruments; however, it significantly revises an entitys accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. ASU 2016-01 also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted for public business entities. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard has on the Issuers financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, InterestImputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (ASU 2015-15). ASU 2015-15 updates the accounting guidance included in ASU 2015-03, InterestImputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The updated accounting guidance provided by ASU 2015-15 was the result of the Emerging Issues Task Force meeting, held on June 18, 2015, at which the SEC staff stated that the SEC would not object to an entity deferring and presenting costs related to revolving debt arrangements as an asset. As the Issuer previously adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 and reclassified all deferred debt financing costs from within total assets to within total liabilities as a contra-liability effective as of February 28, 2015, it has chosen not to avail itself of the updated accounting treatment provided by ASU 2015-15 and continues to include all deferred debt financing costs as a contra-liability within total liabilities.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (ASU 2015-02). ASU 2015-02 significantly changes the consolidation analysis required under GAAP and ends the deferral granted to investment companies from applying the variable interest entity guidance. ASU 2015-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is permitted. Management does not believe these changes will have a material impact on the Issuers financial statements and disclosures.
S-26
In August 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that requires management to assess an entitys ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. The amendments provide a definition of the term substantial doubt and include principles for considering the mitigating effect of managements plans. The amendments also require an evaluation every reporting period, including interim periods for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued), and certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated or not alleviated. The amendments in this update are effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016. Management does not believe these changes will have a material impact on the Issuers financial statements and disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). Under the new guidance, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early application is not permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact these changes will have on the Issuers financial statements and disclosures.
3. Fair Value Measurements
As noted above, the Issuer values all investments in accordance with ASC 820. ASC 820 requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value. As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
ASC 820 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability of inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Issuer is required to provide disclosures on fair value measurements according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the observability of the inputs used to determine fair values. Investments carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
| Level 1Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Issuer has the ability to access. |
| Level 2Valuations based on inputs other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable. |
| Level 3Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The inputs used in the determination of fair value may require significant management judgment or estimation. Such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by disclaimer would result in classification as a Level 3 asset, assuming no additional corroborating evidence. |
In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, the Issuer continues to employ the valuation policy that is consistent with ASC 820 and the 1940 Act.
S-27
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of February 29, 2016, according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Term loans |
$ | | $ | 239,255,853 | $ | 45,397,073 | $ | 284,652,926 | ||||||||
Equity interest |
| 190,095 | 1,768 | 191,863 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | 239,445,948 | $ | 45,398,841 | $ | 284,844,789 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of February 28, 2015, according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Term loans |
$ | | $ | 294,621,817 | $ | | $ | 294,621,817 | ||||||||
Equity interest |
| 617,451 | | 617,451 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | 295,239,268 | $ | | $ | 295,239,268 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers into or out of Level 1, 2 or 3 are recognized at the reporting date.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the year ended February 29, 2016:
Term Loans | Equity Interest | Total | ||||||||||
Balance as of February 28, 2015 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Net unrealized depreciation |
(2,839,083 | ) | (615,683 | ) | (3,454,766 | ) | ||||||
Purchases and other adjustments to cost |
19,713,411 | | 19,713,411 | |||||||||
Sales and redemptions |
(10,930,430 | ) | | (10,930,430 | ) | |||||||
Net realized gain from investments |
6,887 | | 6,887 | |||||||||
Net transfers in Level 3(1) |
39,446,288 | 617,451 | 40,063,739 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance as of February 29, 2016 |
$ | 45,397,073 | $ | 1,768 | $ | 45,398,841 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The Issuers investment in Level 3 investments were classified as such during the year ended February 29, 2016, as market quotes for these investments are only provided by one trading desk. |
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the year ended February 28, 2015:
Term Loans | ||||
Balance as of February 28, 2014 |
$ | 2,618,899 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation |
18,651 | |||
Purchases and other adjustments to cost |
3,840 | |||
Sales and redemptions |
(2,658,626 | ) | ||
Net realized gain from investments |
17,236 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance as of February 28, 2015 |
$ | | ||
|
|
Transfers into or out of Level 3 are recognized at the reporting date.
S-28
Purchases and other adjustments to cost include purchases of new investments at cost, effects of refinancing/restructuring, accretion/amortization of income from discount/premium on debt securities, and PIK.
Sales and redemptions represent net proceeds received from investments sold, and principal paydowns received, during the period.
The net unrealized depreciation on Level 3 investments held as of February 29, 2016 was $3.4 million, and is included in net unrealized depreciation on investments in the statements of operations. There were no Level 3 investments held as of February 28, 2015.
Significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Level 3 term loans and equity include market quotations available from multiple dealers. A significant increase (decrease) in the market quote, in isolation, would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of assets as of February 29, 2016 were as follows:
Fair Value | Valuation Technique |
Unobservable Input |
Range | |||||||
Term loans |
45,397,073 | Market Comparables | Third-Party Bid | 32.00% - 100.00% | ||||||
Equity interest |
1,768 | Market Comparables | Third-Party Bid | 0.01% - 12.83% |
4. Financing
On January 22, 2008, the Issuer issued $400.0 million of notes, consisting of Class A Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes (collectively the Secured Notes), and Subordinated Notes. The notes were issued pursuant to the Indenture.
The Secured Notes are limited recourse obligations of the Issuer. The Subordinated Notes are unsecured, limited recourse debt obligations of the Issuer.
On October 17, 2013, the Issuer issued $284.9 million of notes (the 2013-1 CLO Notes), consisting of Class X Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes, Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes, and Class F Deferrable Floating Rate Notes. The 2013-1 CLO Notes were issued pursuant to the Indenture with the same Trustee. Proceeds of the issuance of the 2013-1 CLO Notes were used along with existing assets held by the Trustee to redeem all of the Secured Notes issued in 2008. The Subordinated Notes were not included in the refinancing transaction.
The 2013-1 CLO Notes are limited recourse obligations of the Issuer. The Subordinated Notes are unsecured, limited recourse debt obligations of the Issuer.
The relative order of seniority of payment of each class of securities is, as follows: first, Class X Notes, second, Class A-1 Notes, third, Class A-2 Notes, fourth, Class B Notes, fifth, Class C Notes, sixth, Class D Notes, seventh, Class E Notes, eighth, Class F Notes, and ninth, the Subordinated Notes, with (a) each class of securities (other than the Subordinated Notes) in such list being senior to each other class of securities that follows such class of securities in such list and (b) each class of securities (other than the Class X Notes) in such list being subordinate to each other class of securities that precedes such class of securities in such list. The Subordinated Notes are subordinated to the 2013-1 CLO Notes and are entitled to periodic payments from interest proceeds available in accordance with the Priority of Payments.
S-29
The table below sets forth certain information for each outstanding class of notes issued, pursuant to the Indenture on October 17, 2013, at February 29, 2016:
Debt Security |
Interest Rate | Maturity | Principal Amount |
Amount Outstanding |
||||||||||||
Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 1.30% | October 20, 2023 | $ | 170,000,000 | $ | 170,000,000 | ||||||||||
Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 1.50% | October 20, 2023 | 20,000,000 | 20,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 2.00% | October 20, 2023 | 44,800,000 | 44,800,000 | ||||||||||||
Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 2.90% | October 20, 2023 | 16,000,000 | 16,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 3.50% | October 20, 2023 | 14,000,000 | 14,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 4.50% | October 20, 2023 | 13,100,000 | 13,100,000 | ||||||||||||
Class F Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 5.75% | October 20, 2023 | 4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated Notes |
N/A | October 20, 2023 | 30,000,000 | 30,000,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
$ | 312,400,000 | $ | 312,400,000 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth certain information for each outstanding class of notes issued, pursuant to the Indenture on October 17, 2013, at February 28, 2015:
Debt Security |
Interest Rate | Maturity | Principal Amount |
Amount Outstanding |
||||||||||||
Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 1.30% | October 20, 2023 | $ | 170,000,000 | $ | 170,000,000 | ||||||||||
Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 1.50% | October 20, 2023 | 20,000,000 | 20,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 2.00% | October 20, 2023 | 44,800,000 | 44,800,000 | ||||||||||||
Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 2.90% | October 20, 2023 | 16,000,000 | 16,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 3.50% | October 20, 2023 | 14,000,000 | 14,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 4.50% | October 20, 2023 | 13,100,000 | 13,100,000 | ||||||||||||
Class F Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 5.75% | October 20, 2023 | 4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated Notes |
N/A | October 20, 2023 | 30,000,000 | 30,000,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
$ | 312,400,000 | $ | 312,400,000 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
S-30
The following table shows each outstanding class of notes issued, pursuant to the Indenture, at fair value at February 29, 2016:
Debt Security |
February 29, 2016 | |||
Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
$ | 168,738,419 | ||
Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
19,899,837 | |||
Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes |
43,780,120 | |||
Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
14,987,621 | |||
Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
12,941,289 | |||
Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
10,358,170 | |||
Class F Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
3,027,150 | |||
Subordinated Notes |
12,827,980 | |||
|
|
|||
$ | 286,560,586 | |||
|
|
The following table shows each outstanding class of notes issued, pursuant to the Indenture, at fair value at February 28, 2015:
Debt Security |
February 28, 2015 | |||
Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
$ | 168,987,651 | ||
Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
19,973,973 | |||
Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes |
44,569,451 | |||
Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
15,898,369 | |||
Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
13,737,672 | |||
Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
12,404,616 | |||
Class F Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
4,234,225 | |||
Subordinated Notes |
17,031,146 | |||
|
|
|||
$ | 296,837,103 | |||
|
|
These notes are fair valued based on a discounted cash flow model, specifically using Intex cash flow models, to form the basis for the valuation and would be classified as level 3 liabilities within the fair value hierarchy.
The following table provides the weighted average interest rate for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014:
Weighted Average Interest Rate | ||||||||||||||||
Debt Security |
Interest Rate | February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||||
2013-1 CLO Notes |
||||||||||||||||
Class X Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 1.05% | N/A | 1.28% | 1.29% | ||||||||||||
Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 1.30% | 1.62% | 1.53% | 1.54% | ||||||||||||
Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 1.50% | 1.82% | 1.73% | 1.74% | ||||||||||||
Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 2.00% | 2.32% | 2.23% | 2.24% | ||||||||||||
Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 2.90% | 3.22% | 3.13% | 3.14% | ||||||||||||
Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 3.50% | 3.82% | 3.73% | 3.74% | ||||||||||||
Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 4.50% | 4.82% | 4.73% | 4.74% | ||||||||||||
Class F Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 5.75% | 6.07% | 5.98% | 5.99% | ||||||||||||
Subordinated Notes |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
S-31
Weighted Average Interest Rate | ||||||||||||||||
Debt Security |
Interest Rate | February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||||
Secured Notes |
||||||||||||||||
Class A Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 0.75% | N/A | N/A | 1.03% | ||||||||||||
Class B Floating Rate Senior Notes |
LIBOR + 2.50% | N/A | N/A | 2.78% | ||||||||||||
Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 3.75% | N/A | N/A | 4.03% | ||||||||||||
Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 4.70% | N/A | N/A | 4.98% | ||||||||||||
Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes |
LIBOR + 6.45% | N/A | N/A | 6.73% |
The Indenture provides that payments on the Subordinated Notes shall rank subordinate in priority of payment to payments due on all classes of 2013-1 CLO Notes and subordinate in priority of payment to the payment of fees and expenses. Distributions on the Subordinated Notes are limited to the assets of the Issuer remaining after payment of all of the liabilities of the Issuer that rank senior in priority of payment to the Subordinated Notes. To the extent that the proceeds from the collateral are not sufficient to make distributions on the Subordinated Notes the Issuer will have no further obligation in respect of the Subordinated Notes.
Interest proceeds and, after the 2013-1 CLO Notes have been paid in full, principal proceeds, in each case will be distributed to the holders of the Subordinated Notes in accordance with the Indenture.
Distributions, if any, on the Subordinated Notes will be payable quarterly on the 20th day of each January, April, July and October of each calendar year or, if any such day is not a business day, on the next succeeding business day (each, a Payment Date), commencing on the first Payment Date, and on January 21, 2020 (or if any such day is not a business day, the next succeeding business day) (the Stated Redemption Date) (if not redeemed prior to such date) sequentially in order of seniority. At the Stated Redemption Date, the Subordinated Notes will be redeemed after payment in full of all of the 2013-1 CLO Notes and the payment of all administrative and other fees and expenses. The failure to pay interest proceeds or principal proceeds to the holders of the Subordinated Notes will not be an event of default under the Indenture.
In May of 2009, the Issuer defaulted on its Class E overcollateralization ratio of 105.10%, at which point, $4.0 million of interest proceeds were used to repay the Class E Notes through November 2009. Interest on the Class C, Class D, and Class E Notes was deferred and repaid in January of 2010 upon the Issuers return to compliance. Distributions to the Subordinated Notes resumed in April of 2010.
As of February 29, 2016, the remaining unamortized discount on the Class A-1 Notes, Class A-2 Notes, Class B Notes, Class C Notes, Class D Notes, Class E Notes, and Class F Notes were $1.3 million, $0.1 million, $0.9 million, $0.6 million, $0.7 million, $1.4 million, and $0.5 million, respectively.
As of February 28, 2015, the remaining unamortized discount on the Class A-1 Notes, Class A-2 Notes, Class B Notes, Class C Notes, Class D Notes, Class E Notes, and Class F Notes were $1.5 million, $0.2 million, $1.0 million, $0.6 million, $0.8 million, $1.5 million, and $0.6 million, respectively.
5. Income Tax
Under the current laws, the Issuer is not subject to net income taxation in the United States or the Cayman Islands. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been made in the accompanying financial statements.
Pursuant to ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, the Issuer adopted the provisions of the FASB relating to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes which clarifies the accounting for income
S-32
taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet before being recognized in the financial statements and applies to all open tax years as of the effective date. The Investment Manager has analyzed such tax positions for uncertain tax positions for tax years that may be open (20132016). The Issuer identifies its major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal, state and foreign jurisdictions where the Issuer makes investments. As of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, there was no impact to the financial statements as a result of the Issuers accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The Issuer does not have any unrecognized tax benefits or liabilities for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014. Also, the Issuer recognizes interest and, if applicable, penalties for any uncertain tax positions, as a component of income tax expense. No interest or penalty expense was recorded by the Issuer for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of its business, the Issuer may enter into contracts or agreements that contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of these provisions against the Issuer. Based on its history and experience, the Investment Manager feels that the likelihood of such an event is remote.
In the ordinary course of business, the Issuer may directly or indirectly be a defendant or plaintiff in legal actions with respect to bankruptcy, insolvency or other types of proceedings. Such lawsuits may involve claims that could adversely affect the value of certain financial instruments owned by the Issuer. As of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the Issuer is not subject to any material legal proceedings.
The terms of Collateralized Debt Investments may require the Issuer to provide funding for any unfunded portion of a Collateralized Debt Investment at the request of the borrower. At February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, the Issuer had no unfunded commitments.
7. Related-Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business and as permitted per the terms of the Indenture, the Issuer may acquire or sell investments to or from related parties at the fair value at such time. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014, the Issuer bought no investments from related parties and sold investments fair valued at $0.0 million, $0.0 million, and $0.3 million, respectively, to the Investment Manager.
The Subordinated Notes are wholly owned by the Investment Manager. The Subordinated Notes do not have a stated coupon rate, but are entitled to residual cash flows from the CLOs investments after all of the other tranches of debt and certain other fees and expenses are paid. For the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014, $5.6 million, $3.7 million, and $5.7 million of payments to the Subordinated Notes were included in interest expense in the statements of operations, respectively.
8. Shareholders Capital
Capital contributions and distributions shall be made at such time and in such amounts as determined by the Investment Manager and the Indenture.
The majority holder of the Subordinated Notes has various control rights over the CLO, including the ability to call the CLO prior to its legal maturity, replace the Investment Manager under certain circumstances, and refinance any of the outstanding debt tranches. The voting structure of the Subordinated Notes may require either majority or unanimous approval depending upon the issue.
The authorized share capital of the Issuer consists of 50,000 ordinary shares, 250 of which are owned by Maples Finance Limited and are held under the terms of a declaration of trust.
S-33
As of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, net assets were $(21.6) million and $(5.8) million, respectively. These amounts include accumulated losses of $(5.8) million and $(3.3) million, respectively, which includes cumulative net investment income or loss, cumulative amounts of gains and losses realized from investment transactions, net unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments, as well as the cumulative effect of accounting mismatches between investments accounted for at fair value and amortized cost or accrual-basis assets and liabilities as discussed in Significant Accounting Policies, above. The Issuers investments continue to generate sufficient liquidity to satisfy its obligations on periodic payment dates as well as comply with all performance criteria as of the statements of assets and liabilities date.
9. Financial Highlights
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014:
February 29, 2016 |
February 28, 2015 |
February 28, 2014 |
||||||||||
Average subordinated notes capital balance(1) |
$ | 18,382,072 | $ | 25,077,372 | $ | 28,471,910 | ||||||
Ratio and supplemental data: |
||||||||||||
Total Return(2) |
(49.59 | )% | 5.34 | % | 4.65 | % | ||||||
Net investment income(3) |
0.57 | % | 3.17 | % | (7.53 | )% | ||||||
Total expenses(3) |
79.34 | % | 49.79 | % | 65.27 | % | ||||||
Base management fee(3) |
4.07 | % | 3.03 | % | 1.82 | % | ||||||
Subordinated management fee(3) |
4.07 | % | 3.03 | % | 4.42 | % |
(1) | Subordinated notes capital balance is calculated based on the sum of the subordinated notes outstanding amount and total net assets, net of ordinary equity. |
(2) | Total return is calculated based on a time-weighted rate of return methodology. Quarterly rates of return are compounded to derive the total return reflected above. Total return is calculated for the subordinated notes capital taken as a whole and assumes the purchase of the subordinated notes capital on the first day of the period and the sale of the last day of the period. |
(3) | Calculated based on the average subordinated notes capital balance. |
10. Subsequent Events
The Investment Manager has evaluated events or transactions that have occurred since February 29, 2016 through May 17, 2016, the date the financial statements were available for issuance. The Investment Manager has determined that there are no material events that would require the disclosure in the financial statements.
S-34
$70,000,000
SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP.
Prospectus
, 2017
PART COTHER INFORMATION
Item 25. | Financial Statements and Exhibits |
1. | Financial Statements |
Page | ||||
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of November 30, 2016 (unaudited) and February 29, 2016 |
F-4 | |||
F-12 | ||||
F-13 |
2. | Exhibits |
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC:
Exhibit |
Description | |
(a)(1) | Articles of Incorporation of Saratoga Investment Corp. (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2007). | |
(a)(2) | Articles of Amendment of Saratoga Investment Corp. (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 3, 2010). | |
(a)(3) | Articles of Amendment of Saratoga Investment Corp. (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 13, 2010). | |
(b) | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Saratoga Investment Corp. (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2008). | |
(c) | Not applicable. | |
(d)(1) | Specimen certificate of Saratoga Investment Corp.s common stock, par value $0.001 per share. (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-169135, filed on September 1, 2010). |
C-1
Exhibit |
Description | |
(d)(2) | Form of Indenture by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-186323, filed on April 30, 2013). | |
(d)(3) | Statement of Eligibility of Trustee on Form T-1.*** | |
(d)(4) | Form of Second Supplemental Indenture between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-214182, filed on December 12, 2016). | |
(d)(5) | Form of Global Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(8) hereto, and Exhibit A therein). | |
(d)(6) | Form of Warrant Certificate and Warrant Agreement*** | |
(d)(7) | Form of Subscription Certificate and Subscription Agreement*** | |
(d)(8) | Form of Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Registrants registration statement on Form N-2 Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 (File No. 333-196526) filed on December 5, 2014). | |
(e) | Dividend Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 24, 2014). | |
(f) | Not applicable. | |
(g) | Investment Advisory and Management Agreement dated July 30, 2010 between Saratoga Investment Corp. and Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-196526, filed on December 5, 2014). | |
(h)(1) | Form of Underwriting Agreement.*** | |
(i) | Not applicable. | |
(j) | Custodian Agreement dated March 21, 2007 between Saratoga Investment LLC and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2007). | |
(k)(1) | Administration Agreement dated July 30, 2010 between Saratoga Investment Corp. and Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2010). | |
(k)(2) | Trademark License Agreement dated July 30, 2010 between Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC and Saratoga Investment Corp. (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2010). | |
(k)(3) | Credit, Security and Management Agreement dated July 30, 2010 by and among Saratoga Investment Funding LLC, Saratoga Investment Corp., Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, Madison Capital Funding LLC and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2010). | |
(k)(4) | Amendment No. 1 to Credit, Security and Management Agreement dated February 24, 2012 by and among Saratoga Investment Funding LLC, Saratoga Investment Corp., Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, Madison Capital Funding LLC and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 29, 2012). |
C-2
Exhibit |
Description | |
(k)(5) | Form of Indemnification Agreement between Saratoga Investment Corp. and each officer and director of Saratoga Investment Corp. (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Registration Statement on Form N-2 filed on January 12, 2007). | |
(k)(6) | Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of November 15, 2016, among Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd., Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association. (incorporated by reference to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-216344, filed on February 28, 2017). | |
(k)(7) | Amended and Restated Collateral Management Agreement, dated October 17, 2013, by and between Saratoga Investment Corp. and Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-196526, filed on December 5, 2014). | |
(k)(8) | Amendment No. 2 to Credit, Security and Management Agreement dated September 17, 2014 by and among Saratoga Investment Funding LLC, Saratoga Investment Corp., Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, Madison Capital Funding LLC and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Saratoga Investment Corp.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2014). | |
(l) | Opinion and Consent of Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, counsel for Saratoga Investment Corp.** | |
(m) | Not applicable. | |
(n)(1) | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, relating to Saratoga Investment Corp. and Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd.** | |
(n)(2) | Report of Ernst & Young LLP regarding the senior securities table contained herein.** | |
(o) | Not applicable. | |
(p) | Not applicable. | |
(q) | Not applicable. | |
(r) | Code of Ethics of the Company adopted under Rule 17j-1 (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 7 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-138051, filed on March 22, 2007). | |
99.1 | Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges. (incorporated by reference to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-216344, filed on February 28, 2017). | |
99.2 | Form of prospectus supplement for common stock offerings (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-196526, filed on December 5, 2014). | |
99.3 | Form of prospectus supplement for preferred stock offerings (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-196526, filed on December 5, 2014). | |
99.4 | Form of prospectus supplement for subscription rights offering (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-196526, filed on December 5, 2014). | |
99.5 | Form of prospectus supplement for warrant offerings (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-196526, filed on December 5, 2014). | |
99.6 | Form of prospectus supplement for retail note offerings (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-196526, filed on December 5, 2014). |
C-3
Exhibit |
Description | |
99.7 | Form of prospectus supplement for institutional note offerings (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2, File No. 333-196526, filed on December 5, 2014). |
* | To be filed by pre-effective amendment, if applicable. |
** | Filed herewith. |
*** | To be filed by post-effective amendment, if applicable. |
Item 26. | Marketing Arrangements |
The information contained under the heading Plan of Distribution on this Registration Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 27. | Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution |
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee |
$ | 8,113 | ||
FINRA filing fee |
11,000 | |||
New York Stock Exchange listing fees |
29,600 | |||
Printing expenses(1) |
25,000 | |||
Accounting fees and expenses(1) |
80,000 | |||
Legal fees and expenses(1) |
150,000 | |||
Miscellaneous(1) |
10,000 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 313,713 | ||
|
|
(1) | The amounts set forth above, with the exception of the Securities and Exchange Commission fee, are in each case estimated. All expenses set forth above will be borne by the Registrant. |
Item 28. | Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control |
The Registrant has two subsidiaries, Saratoga Investment Funding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC LP, a Delaware limited partnership. The Registrant owns 100% of the outstanding equity interests of Saratoga Investment Funding LLC and Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC LP.
In addition, the Registrant may be deemed to control Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1 Ltd. one of the Registrants portfolio companies.
Item 29. | Number of Holders of Securities |
The following table sets forth the approximate number of record holders of the Companys common stock as of February 24, 2017.
Title of Class |
Number of Record Holders |
|||
Common Stock, $0.001 par value |
21 |
Item 30. | Indemnification |
Reference is made to Section 2-418 of the Maryland General Corporation Law, Article VII of the Registrants charter and Article XI of the Registrants Amended and Restated Bylaws.
C-4
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. The Registrants charter contains such a provision which eliminates directors and officers liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, subject to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act).
The Registrants charter authorizes the Registrant, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while serving as the Registrants director or officer and at the Registrants request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee, from and against any claim or liability to which that person may become subject or which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse their reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. The Registrants bylaws obligate the Registrant, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while serving as the Registrants director or officer and at the Registrants request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee and who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity from and against any claim or liability to which that person may become subject or which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse his or her reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. The charter and bylaws also permit the Registrant to indemnify and advance expenses to any person who served a predecessor of the Registrant in any of the capacities described above and any of the Registrants employees or agents or any employees or agents of the Registrants predecessor. In accordance with the 1940 Act, the Registrant will not indemnify any person for any liability to which such person would be subject by reason of such persons willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which the Registrants charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad faith or (2) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly received unless, in either case, a court orders indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer in advance of final disposition of a proceeding upon the corporations receipt of (a) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the corporation and (b) a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
Adviser and Administrator
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC (the investment adviser) and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling
C-5
persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from the Registrant for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of the investment advisers services under the investment advisory agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Registrant.
The administration agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from the Registrant for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLCs services under the administration agreement or otherwise as administrator for the Registrant.
The law also provides for comparable indemnification for corporate officers and agents. Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The Registrant has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors. The indemnification agreements are intended to provide the Registrants directors the maximum indemnification permitted under Maryland law and the 1940 Act. Each indemnification agreement provides that the Registrant shall indemnify the director who is a party to the agreement (an Indemnitee), including the advancement of legal expenses, if, by reason of his or her corporate status, the Indemnitee is, or is threatened to be, made a party to or a witness in any threatened, pending, or completed proceeding, other than a proceeding by or in the right of the Registrant.
Item 31. | Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser |
A description of any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature in which the Adviser, and each managing director, director or executive officer of the Adviser, is or has been during the past two fiscal years, engaged in for his or her own account or in the capacity of director, officer, employee, partner or trustee, is set forth in Part A of this Registration Statement in the sections entitled Management. Additional information regarding the Adviser and its officers and directors will be set forth in its Form ADV to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 32. | Location of Accounts and Records |
All accounts, books and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the rules thereunder are maintained at the offices of:
(1) | the Registrant, Saratoga Investment Corp., 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022; |
(2) | the Transfer Agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level, New York, New York 10038; |
(3) | the Custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, 214 N. Tryon Street, 12th Floor, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202; and |
(4) | the Adviser, Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022. |
C-6
Item 33. | Management Services |
Not Applicable.
Item 34. | Undertakings |
(1) | Registrant undertakes to suspend the offering of the securities covered hereby until it amends the prospectus contained herein if (a) subsequent to the effective date of this Registration Statement, its net asset value declines more than 10% from its net asset value as of the effective date of this Registration Statement, or (b) its net asset value increases to an amount greater than its net proceeds as stated in the prospectus contained herein. |
(2) | Not applicable. |
(3) | Registrant undertakes in the event that the securities being registered are to be offered to existing stockholders pursuant to warrants or rights, and any securities not taken by shareholders are to be reoffered to the public, to supplement the prospectus, after the expiration of the subscription period, to set forth the results of the subscription offer, the transactions by the underwriters during the subscription period, the amount of unsubscribed securities to be purchased by underwriters, and the terms of any subsequent underwriting thereof. Registrant further undertakes that if any public offering by the underwriters of the securities being registered is to be made on terms differing from those set forth on the cover page of the prospectus, the Registrant shall file a post-effective amendment to set forth the terms of such offering. |
(4) | Registrant undertakes: |
(a) | to file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement: |
(i) | to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; |
(ii) | to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement; and |
(iii) | to include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in this Registration Statement or any material change to such information in this Registration Statement. |
(b) | that, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of those securities at the time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof; |
(c) | to remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering; |
(d) | that, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, if the Registrant is subject to Rule 430C: Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 497(b), (c), (d) or (e) under the Securities Act of 1933 as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A under the Securities Act of 1933, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the Registration Statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use; and |
C-7
(e) | that for the purpose of determining liability of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of securities: |
the undersigned Registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned Registrant pursuant to this Registration Statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned Registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to the purchaser: |
(i) | any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned Registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 497 under the Securities Act of 1933; |
(ii) | the portion of any advertisement pursuant to Rule 482 under the Securities Act of 1933 relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned Registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned Registrant; and |
(iii) | any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned Registrant to the purchaser. |
(5) | The Registrant hereby undertakes to file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement under Section 8(a) of the Securities Act if the cumulative dilution to its net asset value (NAV) per share arising from an offering from the effective date of the current registration statement through and including any follow-on offering would exceed 15% based on the anticipated pricing of such follow-on offering. This limit would be measured separately for each offering pursuant to the current registration statement by calculating the percentage dilution or accretion to aggregate NAV from that offering and then summing the anticipated percentage dilution from each subsequent offering. If the Registrant files a new post-effective amendment, the threshold would reset. |
C-8
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant has duly caused this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in The City of New York, in the State of New York, on the 10th day of March, 2017.
SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP. | ||
By: /s/ Christian L. Oberbeck | ||
Name: | Christian L. Oberbeck | |
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
/s/ Christian L. Oberbeck | Chief Executive Officer and Director | March 10, 2017 | ||
Christian L. Oberbeck | (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
/s/ Henri J. Steenkamp | Chief Compliance Officer and | March 10, 2017 | ||
Henri J. Steenkamp | Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |||
* | President and Director | March 10, 2017 | ||
Michael J. Grisius |
||||
* | Director | March 10, 2017 | ||
Steven M. Looney |
||||
* | Director | March 10, 2017 | ||
Charles S. Whitman III |
||||
* | Director | March 10, 2017 | ||
G. Cabell Williams |
* | Signed by Henri J. Steenkamp pursuant to power of attorney granted on February 28, 2017. |
Exhibit (l)
[Letterhead of Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP]
March 10, 2017
Saratoga Investment Corp.
535 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Re: | Saratoga Investment Corp. |
Registration Statement on Form N-2
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as counsel to Saratoga Investment Corp., a Maryland corporation (the Company), in connection with the preparation and filing by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) of a registration statement on Form N-2 on March 10, 2017 (as amended from time to time, the Registration Statement) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), with respect to the offer, issuance and sale from time to time pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of up to $70,000,000 in aggregate offering amount of the following securities:
(i) | shares of the Companys common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the Common Stock); |
(ii) | shares of preferred stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (Preferred Stock and together with the Common Stock, the Shares); |
(iii) | subscription rights to purchase Common Stock (Subscription Rights); |
(iv) | debt securities (Debt Securities); and |
(v) | warrants representing rights to purchase Common Stock, Preferred Stock or Debt Securities (Warrants, and together with the Common Stock, the Preferred Stock, the Subscription Rights and the Debt Securities, the Securities). The Registration Statement provides that the Securities may be issued from time to time in amounts, at prices, and on terms to be set forth in one or more supplements (each, a Prospectus Supplement ) to the final prospectus included in the Registration Statement at the time it becomes effective (the Prospectus). |
The Debt Securities are to be issued in one or more series pursuant to an indenture, dated as of May 10, 2013 (the Base Indenture) entered into by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association as trustee (the Trustee) and any supplemental indenture (each, a Supplemental Indenture and, together with the Base Indenture, the Indenture), as may be agreed from time to time between the Company and the Trustee. The Warrants will be issued under one or more warrant agreements (each, a Warrant Agreement) to be entered into by and between the Company and the purchasers thereof or a warrant agent to be identified in the applicable Warrant Agreement (the Warrant Agent). The Subscription Rights are to be issued from time to time pursuant to one or more subscription rights agreements (each, a Subscription Rights Agreement) to be entered into by and between the Company and the purchasers thereof or a rights agent to be identified in the applicable Subscription Rights Agreement.
As counsel to the Company, we have participated in the preparation of the Registration Statement and have examined the originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction as being true copies, of such records, documents or other instruments as we in our judgment have deemed to be necessary or appropriate to enable us to render the opinions hereinafter expressed including, without limitation, the following:
(i) | The Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended by the Articles of Amendment thereto, certified as of a recent date by an officer of the Company (the Charter); |
(ii) | The Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, certified as of the date hereof by an officer of the Company (the Bylaws); |
(iii) | The Base Indenture; |
(iv) | A Certificate of Good Standing with respect to the Company issued by the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of the State of Maryland as of a recent date (the Certificate of Good Standing); and |
(v) | The resolutions of the board of directors of the Company (the Board) relating to, among other things, (a) the authorization and approval of the preparation and filing of the Registration Statement, and (b) the authorization of the issuance, offer and sale of the Securities pursuant to the Registration Statement, and (c) the authorization, execution, and delivery of the Base Indenture, certified as of the date hereof by an officer of the Company (collectively, the Resolutions). |
With respect to such examination and our opinions expressed herein, we have assumed, without any independent investigation or verification, (i) the genuineness of all signatures on all documents submitted to us for examination, (ii) the legal capacity of all natural persons, (iii) the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, (iv) the conformity to original documents of all documents submitted to us as conformed or reproduced copies and the authenticity of the originals of such copied documents, and (v) that all certificates issued by public officials have been properly issued. We also have assumed (i) without independent investigation or verification the accuracy and completeness of all corporate records made available to us by the Company, , (ii) that the Warrant Agreements and the Subscription Rights Agreements will be governed by the laws of the State of New York, and (iii) that the Indenture, the Warrant Agreements, and the Subscription Rights Agreements will be valid and legally binding obligations of the parties thereto (other than the Company).
As to certain matters of fact relevant to the opinions in this opinion letter, we have relied on a certificate of an officer of the Company. We also have relied on certificates of public officials (which we have assumed remain accurate as of the date of this opinion). We have not independently established the facts, or in the case of certificates of public officials, the other statements, so relied upon.
The opinions set forth below are limited to the effect of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the MGCL) and as to the Debt Securities, the Warrants, and the Subscription Rights constituting valid and legally binding obligations of the Company, the laws of the State of New York, in each case, as in effect on the date hereof, and we express no opinion as to the applicability or effect of any other laws of the State of Maryland or the laws of any other jurisdictions. Without limiting the preceding sentence, we express no opinion as to any federal or state securities or broker-dealer laws or regulations thereunder relating to the offer, issuance and sale of the Securities pursuant to the Registration Statement. Our opinions expressed in this opinion letter as to enforceability are subject to (a) bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, receivership, moratorium, fraudulent conveyance and other similar laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors generally and (b) general principles of equity (including without limitation the availability of specific performance or injunctive relief and the application of concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing), regardless of whether considered in a proceeding at law or in equity, and we express no opinion as to the enforceability of rights to indemnity and contribution to the extent it may be limited by federal or state securities laws or principles of public policy. This opinion letter has been prepared, and should be interpreted, in accordance with customary practice followed in the preparation of opinion letters by lawyers who regularly give, and such customary practice followed by lawyers who on behalf of their clients regularly advise opinion recipients regarding, opinion letters of this kind.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, and subject to the assumptions, limitations and other matters set forth in this opinion letter, we are of the opinion that:
1. | Assuming that (i) the issuance, offer and sale of the Shares from time to time and the final terms and conditions of such issuance, offer and sale, including those relating to the price and amount of the Shares to be issued, offered and sold, have been duly authorized and determined or otherwise established by proper action of the Board in accordance with the MGCL, the Charter, the Bylaws and the Resolutions, (ii) the Shares have been delivered to, and the agreed consideration has been fully paid at the time of such delivery |
2
by, the purchasers thereof, (iii) upon issuance of the Shares, the total number of shares of Common Stock, in the case that the Shares so issued are Common Stock, or Preferred Stock, in the case that the Shares so issued are Preferred Stock, issued and outstanding does not exceed the total number of shares of Common Stock, in the case that the Shares so issued are Common Stock, or Preferred Stock, in the case that the Shares so issued are Preferred Stock, that the Company is then authorized to issue under the Charter, (iv) the Certificate of Good Standing remains accurate, (v) in the case of shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants or shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Subscription Rights, the assumptions stated in paragraphs numbered (3) and (4) below are true and correct and (vi) prior to the issuance of a series of Preferred Stock, an appropriate articles supplementary relating to such series of Preferred Stock will have been duly authorized by the Company and filed with and accepted for record by the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of the State of Maryland, the Shares will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. |
2. | Assuming that (i) each Supplemental Indenture relating to the Debt Securities has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by each of the Company and the Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, (ii) the issuance, offer and sale of the Debt Securities from time to time and the final terms and conditions of the Debt Securities to be so issued, offered and sold, including those relating to price and amount of Debt Securities to be issued, offered and sold, (a) have been duly authorized and determined or otherwise established by proper action of the Board in accordance with the Charter and Bylaws, (b) are consistent with the terms thereof in the Indenture, (c) do not violate any applicable law, (d) do not violate or result in a default under or breach of any agreement, instrument or other document binding upon the Company, and (e) comply with all requirements or restrictions imposed by any court or governmental body having jurisdiction over the Company; (iii) the Debt Securities have been (a) duly executed and delivered by the Company and duly authenticated by the Trustee in accordance with the Indenture and (b) delivered to, and the agreed consideration therefor has been fully paid at the time of such delivery by, the purchasers thereof; (iv) the Debt Securities do not include any provision that is unenforceable against the Company; (v) at the time of issuance of the Debt Securities, after giving effect to such issuance of the Debt Securities, the Company will be in compliance with Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, giving effect to Section 61(a)(1) thereof; and (vi) in the case of Debt Securities issuable upon the exercise of warrants, the assumptions stated in paragraphs numbered (3) and (4) below are true and correct, the Debt Securities will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Company. |
3. | Assuming that (i) the Warrant Agreements have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the parties thereto, and that no terms included therein would affect the validity of the opinion expressed in this paragraph numbered (3), (ii) the issuance, offer and sale of Warrants from time to time and the final terms and conditions of the Warrants to be so issued, offered and sold, including those relating to price and amount of the Warrants to be issued, offered and sold, (a) have been duly authorized and determined or otherwise established by proper action of the Board in accordance with the Charter and Bylaws, (b) are consistent with the terms thereof in the applicable Warrant Agreement, (c) do not violate any applicable law, (d) do not violate or result in a default under or breach of any agreement, instrument or other document binding upon the Company, and (e) comply with all requirements or restrictions imposed by any court or governmental body having jurisdiction over the Company and (iii) the Warrants have been (a) duly executed and delivered by the Company and duly countersigned in accordance with the applicable Warrant Agreement, and (b) delivered to, and the agreed consideration therefor has been fully paid at the time of such delivery by, the purchasers thereof as contemplated by the Registration Statement, the Warrants will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Company. |
4. | Assuming that (i) the Subscription Rights Agreements have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the parties thereto, and that no terms included therein would affect the validity of the opinion expressed in this paragraph numbered (4), (ii) the issuance, offer and sale of the Subscription Rights from time to time and the final terms and conditions of the Subscription Rights to be so issued, offered and sold, including those relating to price and amount of Subscription Rights to be issued, offered and sold, (a) have been duly authorized and determined or otherwise established by proper action of the Board in accordance with the Charter and Bylaws, (b) are consistent with the terms thereof in the applicable Subscription Rights Agreement, (c) do not violate any applicable law, (d) do not violate or result in a default under or breach of any agreement, instrument or other document binding upon the Company, and (e) comply with all |
3
requirements or restrictions imposed by any court or governmental body having jurisdiction over the Company and (iii) the Subscription Rights have been (a) duly executed and delivered by the Company and duly countersigned in accordance with the applicable Subscription Rights Agreement, and (b) delivered to, and the agreed consideration therefor has been fully paid at the time of such delivery by, the purchasers thereof as contemplated by the Registration Statement, the Subscription Rights will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Company. |
The opinions expressed in this opinion letter (i) are strictly limited to the matters stated in this opinion letter, and without limiting the foregoing, no other opinions are to be implied and (ii) are only as of the date of this opinion letter, and we are under no obligation, and do not undertake, to advise the addressee of this opinion letter or any other person or entity either of any change of law or fact that occurs, or of any fact that comes to our attention, after the date of this opinion letter, even though such change or such fact may affect the legal analysis or a legal conclusion in this opinion letter.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion letter as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm in the Legal Matters section in the Registration Statement. We do not admit by giving this consent that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND (US) LLP
4
Exhibit (N)(1)
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the reference to our firm under the captions Selected Financial and Other Data, Senior Securities and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and to the use of our reports (a) dated May 17, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Saratoga Investment Corp. and the financial statements of Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1, Ltd. as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, and for the three years in the period ended February 29, 2016, and (b) dated March 10, 2017, with respect to the senior securities table of Saratoga Investment Corp. as of February 29, 2016, in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form N-2 No. 333-216344).
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York
March 10, 2017
Exhibit (N)(2)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders of Saratoga Investment Corp.
We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of Saratoga Investment Corp. (the Company), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for the years ended February 29, 2016, February 28, 2015 and 2014, in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form N-2 No. 333-216344) and have expressed an unqualified opinion thereon dated May 17, 2016. We have also audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of the Company, including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of February 28, 2014 and 2013, and February 29, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for the years ended February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012 and have issued unqualified opinions thereon (which are not included in this Registration Statement). The senior securities table as of February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015, 2014, 2013 and February 29, 2012 has been subjected to audit procedures performed in conjunction with the audits of the Companys consolidated financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our audit procedures included determining whether the information reconciles to the consolidated financial statements or the underlying accounting and other records, as applicable, and performing procedures to test the completeness and accuracy of this information. In forming our opinion on the information, we evaluated whether such information, including its form and content, is presented in conformity with Section 18 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated financial statements as a whole.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New York, NY
March 10, 2017